Impact case study database
Search and filter
Filter by
- Coventry University
- 32 - Art and Design: History, Practice and Theory
- Submitting institution
- Coventry University
- Unit of assessment
- 32 - Art and Design: History, Practice and Theory
- Summary impact type
- Societal
- Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
- No
1. Summary of the impact
Addressing United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities, Woodcock’s design and ongoing leadership of three European interdisciplinary research projects (totalling over €9m), has impacted on policy and implementation of new mobility strategies that encourage cleaner, safer and more inclusive transport. The research has led to: (1) implementation of cleaner and safer innovative transport solutions; (2) new processes and policies within cities to increase sustainable transport measures; (3) increased LA capacity in sustainable mobility planning; (4) improved inclusion and representation in sustainable transport planning and contribution to wider SUMP (sustainable urban mobility planning) uptake in Europe.
2. Underpinning research
Woodcock’s research is driven by her vision for safer, inclusive, affordable, accessible and sustainable transport systems. Integrated sustainability planning is a major focus for European cities under the SUMP initiative. Supporting Local Authorities (LAs) in this process is critical. They control multimillion-euro budgets (e.g. beneficiary Transport for West Midlands (TfWM) has operational and capital expenditure of £300m p.a.), with master plans mapping long-term city development and the health and wellbeing of citizens. Through interdisciplinary collaboration and leadership of over 20 European partners, Woodcock’s research has combined design thinking and organisational change to help LAs deal with global challenges, meet climate and inclusivity targets and improve the quality of active and public transport. Central to her research, has been the application of systems-thinking, empathy and user-centred design to understand people’s mobility needs and the development of resources (training materials, tools and processes) for stakeholders to apply this information to mobility planning, measurement and implementation (R1).
In FP7 METPEX (2012-2015) (G1), Woodcock recognised the need to 1) shift perceptions of public transport (R1), 2) widen definitions of hard to reach groups to include women, travellers with dependents, the elderly, young people, commuters, those on low incomes, with communication and mobility difficulties so their journeys could be recorded, 3) standardise data collection. METPEX developed a whole journey (from planning through to arrival at destination) multimodal measurement instrument to capture travel experiences (R2, R3) across 8 European cities, and derive and validate 25 Key Performance (Passenger-related) Indicators (R2).
H2020 CIVITAS SUITS ( Sustainable Urban Integrated Transport Systems: Transferable tools for small - medium Local Authorities) (2016-2020) (G2) built on METPEX, by increasing the capacity of small to medium cities to plan sustainable, inclusive, safe and integrated transport. Without one agency responsible for the whole journey experience (R2) and a plethora of new service providers, LAs need additional support to understand and plan appropriate, integrated, safe and inclusive transport innovations (such as e-bikes, drones) to reach environmental targets and make their cities healthier and attractive. Working with 9 EU cities, ranging in size from about 17k to 2.3M citizens (total population 5.4 million) SUITS developed a range of tools (R5), based on LAs requirements to support organisational change (Nienaber) (R4), citizen engagement, capacity building, collaboration, innovative financing and procurement, data collection and integration and inclusivity. SUITS outputs (R4-5) have had a significant and direct impact on LA organisation, planning, awards of new tenders and safer, more inclusive measures benefiting all citizens.
Following a thread in her work since 1999 and building on previous projects, TInnGO (Transport Innovation Gender Observatory) (2018-2021) (G3) addresses the need for a paradigm shift in the transport sector to remove gender and diversity gaps in transport education, employment and usage. TinnGO’s Pan-European website is a one-stop shop for tools, resources, data and information about gender and transport (R5). It incorporates an Open Innovation Platform ( www.tinngo.eu) for ten national design and research hubs to gather intersectional and gender disaggregated data, and uses citizen science and codesign to engage hard to reach groups and promote tools to improve workforce diversity. The Hubs thereby act as beacons of engagement to collect and increase awareness of women as employees, entrepreneurs and transport users, and facilitate the development of gender sensitive transport innovations (R5, R6).
3. References to the research
Publications:
(R1) Woodcock, A. (2013) ‘ The Role of Ergonomics in the Design of Future Cities. In Contemporary Ergonomics and Human Factors’: Proceedings of the international conference on Ergonomics & Human Factors 2013, Cambridge, UK, 15-18 April 2013 (p. 203). CRC Press. ISBN-13:978-113800042
(R2) Tovey, M., Woodcock, A., & Osmond, J. (Eds.). (2016) ‘ Designing Mobility and Transport Services: Developing Traveller Experience Tools’ (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315587295
(R3) Diana, M., Pirra, M., Castro, A., Duarte, A., Brangeon, V., Di Majo, C., Hrin,G. R and Woodcock, A. (2016) ‘ Development of an integrated set of indicators to measure the quality of the whole traveller experience’. Transportation Research Procedia, 14, 1164-1173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.187
(R4) Nienaber AM., Spundflasch S., Soares A., Woodcock A. (2020) Employees’ Vulnerability – The Challenge When Introducing New Technologies in Local Authorities. In: Krömker H. (eds) HCI in Mobility, Transport, and Automotive Systems. Driving Behavior, Urban and Smart Mobility. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 12213. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50537-0_22
(R5) SUITS Tools: are detailed on the SUITS project website https://www.suits-project.eu/tools/ and capacity building program: outputs are disseminated by the central European repositories ELTIS ( https://www.eltis.org/resources/tools/suits-capacity-building-toolbox) and CIVITAS ( https://civitas.eu/projects/suits)
(R6) Woodcock, A., Christensen, H.R. and Levin, L. (2020). TInnGO: Challenging Gender Inequality in Smart Mobility, Journal of Road and Traffic Engineering. DOI: 10.31075/PIS.66.02.0
Grants:
(G1) 2012-2015 METPEX A MEasurement Tool to determine the quality of the Passenger EXperience. EU FP7-TRANSPORT. Grant agreement ID: 314354; €3,542,972. PI Andree Woodcock. https://cordis.europa.eu/article/id/158532-innovative-tool-to-measure-passenger-experience-for-entire-public-transport-journeys
(G2) 2016-2021 Supporting Urban Integrated Transport Systems: Transferable tools for authorities. H2020-EU.3.4. Grant agreement ID: 690650; €4,111,361.26. PI Andree Woodcock. https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/690650
(G3) 2018-2021 Transport Innovation Gender Observatory. H2020-EU.3.4. Grant agreement ID: 824349. €3,979,502.50. PI Andree Woodcock. https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/824349
A clear impact strategy (G1-3) includes 3 EU conferences, policy notes and practitioner briefings, guidelines for European cities and web-based resources supporting the Pan-European SUMP (Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans) initiative. Multilingual outputs from all projects have been included in Pan European collections. Woodcock demonstrates sustained commitment to addressing mobility issues of excluded groups in Europe and building capacity to meet sustainability and equality targets, taking a more people centred and holistic approach to transport design. She is one of the few female leaders of transport research in Europe. The quality of the research is conveyed through its publication in key journals and conferences in the field, and through significant award of European Union research and innovation funding through the Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) and the Horizon 2020 programme.
4. Details of the impact
The research has led to the implementation of sustainable transport measures and changes in public transport policy in six European cities: Alba Iulia, Romania (S1), Kalamaria, Greece (S2), Turin, Italy (S3), Valencia, Spain (S4), Coventry (S5) and the West Midlands region, UK (S6). Benefits have been realised through (1) implementation of cleaner and safer public transport solutions; (2) new processes and policies within cities to increase sustainable transport measures; (3) increased LA capacity in sustainable mobility planning; (4) improved inclusion and representation in transport planning.
Implementation of cleaner and safer public transport solutions
Woodcock and Nienaber’s research has accelerated sustainable transport planning and the implementation of new technology to improve safety. In Kalamaria, the research has provided a process and tools (G2) to help implementation of solar-powered, smart pedestrian crossings near four schools leading to a reduction in accidents and increased awareness of speed and sustainability issues amongst drivers (S2). An intelligent parking scheme has also been agreed for the centre of Kalamaria (due end 2021) to reduce pollution and congestion:
“Initially 50 spaces were agreed, but the arguments we were able to present (through increased understanding brought about by the SUITS capacity building programme) along with our research findings helped us influence perceptions within the municipality and persuaded them to expand the plan to accommodate 150 spaces”. (S2)
New processes and policies within cities to increase sustainable transport measures
Application of innovative financing and procurement processes (G2; R5) has increased the capacity of cities to finance and implement sustainable transport measures (S1, S3, S5-6). In Alba Iulia, this enabled procurement of cleaner vehicles equipped to monitor pollutants:
“Alba Iulia will be one of the first cities in Romania with electric buses in 2022. Through an innovative public tender with the Ministry of Development, the city has procured 15 new buses installed with air quality monitors, enabling the monitoring of pollutants in the city” (S1).
Through innovative procurement (R5), Turin has implemented sustainable freight delivery, with incentives introduced for the acquisition of clean vehicles. As a result, freight operators have experienced a 20% increase in productivity, with a 90% reduction of common air pollutant emissions (S3). This increase in transport operator productivity has enabled the municipality to demonstrate to other operators and stakeholders the value of investing in technologies with zero emissions.
Implementation of the research (R4-5) through a new organisational change process has optimised trust and skill-sharing within, and between LAs, and influenced transport policy (S1, S3-7):
“The biggest impact was adopting Professors Woodcock and Nienaber’s approaches to organisational change and trust. Increasingly, we have adopted a ‘bottom-up approach’ where the management listen to employees and there is daily contact with citizens and the wider society and transport sector.” (S4)
The research (G1, G2) has directed the refresh of the Statutory Transport Plan for the West Midlands (S6) and helped shape Valencia’s people-centric and sustainable approach outlined in their new Mobility Regulation and associated documentation: ‘ Towards a (+) sustainable mobility in València. Policies and objectives in the area of mobility and public space of the City Council of València. ’ (S4).
Increased LA capacity in sustainable mobility planning
Application of Woodcock’s research (G1-3), has increased knowledge and developed capacity in citizen engagement, and the use of data informed approaches to planning, implementing and assessing sustainable mobility measures (S1, S2, S4-7):
“Employing a data driven approach and the METPEX measures developed by Professor Woodcock, has enabled an understanding of community diversity in Coventry in respect to public transport. Following SUITS guidelines, there has been wide consultation with vulnerable road users, which has led to a more effective implementation for the new e-Scooter and smart crossings schemes.” (S5)
The use of mobility data (R2, R3) has enabled cities to demonstrate progress against their sustainability plans, gain recognition, benefit from the award of new related projects (S1, S2, S6), and grow internal LA capacity (e.g. S2, S6):
“Professor Woodcock’s focus on intelligent mobility and the METPEX measurement instruments … have informed our approach to data usage and enabled the measurement of public satisfaction with transport safety and security and public transport. Adopting these principles, TfWM has established the Data Insight Service to collect a raft of data to inform transport decision-making (S6).
Improved inclusion and representation in transport planning.
New approaches to improve the inclusion of marginalised groups in transport planning have been embraced (G1-3). Woodcock’s inclusive and participatory approaches to strategy development and implementation have been embraced by the LAs is each of the 6 cities (S2-8):
“Two sets of lights have been installed in areas selected following consultation with people who are impaired” (S2).
Impact is clear in the city of Alba Iulia, where a change in thinking and policy is evident in the adoption of the’ European Charter for Equality of Women & Men in Local Life’ in November 2020 (S8). The charter aims to balance participation of women and men in political, social and public decision-making and was promoted and sustained by the Romanian Hub of the TInnGO project (R6, G3).
5. Sources to corroborate the impact
(S1) Testimony. Mayor of Alba Iulia Municipality, Alba lulia Municipality, Calea Motilor Str. 5A, Alba Lulia, Alba County, 510134
(S2) Testimony. Mayor of Kalamaria, Komninon 58, 55132 Kalamaria, Greece
(S3) Testimony. Official at the Municipality of Turin, Staff of the Deputy Mayor in charge of Mobility, City of Torino, Italy
(S4) Testimony. Mobility specialist at Las Naves, Greater València Metropolitan Area, Valencia
(S5) Testimony. Transport Innovation Manager, Coventry City Council, One Friargate, Coventry, CV1 2GN
(S6) Testimony. Head of Transport Innovation, Transport for West Midlands, 16 Summer Lane, Birmingham, B19 3SD
(S7) Testimony. Direzione Ingegneria, Roma Servizi per la Mobilità S.r.l. Italy
(S8) Press release on the TInnGO website (online as at 05.03.21) https://transportgenderobservatory.eu/2021/02/08/equal-is-the-new-normal-alba-iulia-municipality-has-officially-adopted-the-european-charter-for-equality-of-women-and-men-in-local-life/
- Submitting institution
- Coventry University
- Unit of assessment
- 32 - Art and Design: History, Practice and Theory
- Summary impact type
- Societal
- Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
- No
1. Summary of the impact
This case study draws on Anthony Luvera’s socially-engaged photographic research highlighting its influence on creative industry practice and attitudes to homelessness within various audiences at a national and international level. Impact on four key groups is identified:
Individuals with lived experience - enhanced quality of life through increased cultural participation
Public understanding of the lived experience of homelessness and issues with Council support - circa 220,000 attendees at physical exhibitions and dissemination through traditional and online media
Parliamentary/Local Authority (LA) - policy debate informed by the research
Practitioners (galleries/artists) - documented impact on practice with international reach, including Europe, the USA, and Argentina.
2. Underpinning research
This case study is derived from participatory, socially-engaged practice research undertaken by Anthony Luvera between 2013 and 2020 (and on behalf of Coventry University since 2014). Luvera embeds himself in the world of those with whom he collaborates. He builds relationships and trust, whilst developing photographic and digital skills, enabling the communication of experiences through photographs and other media. Luvera’s participatory methods challenge the ‘flying in and out’ mentality that can be associated with traditional approaches to the representation of social issues.
Assembly (R1)** was co-created with over 50 people with lived experience of homelessness in Brighton and Hove between 2013 and 2014. First exhibited in Phoenix Gallery Brighton (4 October to 2 November 2014), the exhibition comprised over 70 photographs, a 50-minute soundscape, performances by The Cascade Chorus (a community choir for people in recovery from addiction issues), and a public engagement programme at the Phoenix Gallery. Assembly continues to be exhibited internationally (e.g. the Goa International Photography Festival) and featured in various publications. It led to a collaboration between Luvera and a participant, Gerald Mclaverty, on the project Frequently Asked Questions ( FAQ) ( R2).
FAQ sought to present research about support and services available to people with lived experience of homelessness. In 2014, Luvera and Gerald Mclaverty sent email correspondence to council representatives in 44 cities and towns across the UK, written from Mclaverty’s experience of homelessness, requesting information about services provided in each locality. At the heart of FAQ, are questions that enquire about an individual’s right to access to basic living provisions such as shelter, personal safety, health, food, and communication. The dossier of replies and other materials received from the LAs, was first installed in the gallery space within the exhibition of Assembly at Phoenix Gallery, providing the central focus of public engagement events. In April 2017, Luvera and Mclaverty launched the next iteration of FAQ at the Tate Modern, followed by a new round of enquiries sent to 61 LAs. In January 2018, working with the Museum of Homelessness (MoH), and after extensive analysis, the findings were exhibited at Tate Liverpool, within its Tate Exchange space, for an exhibition entitled ‘ State of the Nation’ (R2). The work was installed as a 13-metre wall display, accompanied by an extensive public engagement programme in partnership with individuals, and organisations such as Liverpool Salon, Established Beyond, South Liverpool Homes, Social Policy Forum, The Whitechapel Centre, and University of Liverpool. Considering the introduction of the Homelessness Reduction Act 2017, Luvera and Mclaverty conducted further questioning of councils in 2019 to see if the Act had resulted in any discernible change in their behaviour or responses. Emails were sent to 110 LAs and comprehensive analysis of the new data undertaken. Further exhibitions of the 2014, 2017 and 2019 survey iterations, were held at The People’s Republic of Stokes Croft in Bristol from 27 November to 12 December 2019, and the ‘ Taking Place’ exhibition at The Gallery at Foyles in London from 11 January to 29 February 2020 (R2).
Luvera’s approach has been shared widely, for example through Photography for Whom? (R3) a biannual journal that seeks to present historic text alongside a commissioned piece of writing, to foster critical consideration of socially-engaged photography. Photography for Whom? is edited by Luvera, supported by GRAIN, and has a circulation of 800 journals to selected galleries, museums, libraries, and bookshops. The research was also shared with an **international audience through the workshop (Un)making Images Together: Photography and Collaboration in Riga, Latvia in 2019 (R4) that Luvera delivered alongside artist Vincen Beeckman.
3. References to the research
R1) Luvera, A. (2014) Assembly. Artefact. Submitted to REF2021. Including exhibition at Brighton Photo Fringe, Phoenix Gallery Brighton. http://www.asocialpractice.com/assembly/
and within the Portraits from an Island, curated by Anna Fox, at the Goa International Photography Festival in 2015 https://annafox.co.uk/publications/portraits-from-an-island/
R2) Luvera, A. (2014) FAQ. Artefact. Submitted to REF2021. Including exhibitions at People’s Republic of Stokes Croft, Bristol (2019) - https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-50458291); and at Tate Liverpool (2018) - https://www.tate.org.uk/whats-on/tate-liverpool/workshop/state-nation/frequently-asked-questions-anthony-luvera-and-gerald
R3) Luvera (ed) (1st edition June 2019) Photography for Whom? including Introduction by Luvera. Circulated to 800 libraries, galleries and bookshops - https://grainphotographyhub.co.uk/portfolio-type/photography-for-whom/
R4) Luvera, A., Beeckman, V. (2019) (Un)making Images Together: Photography and Collaboration, ISSP Workshop, Latvia 12-20 July 2019 https://issp.lv/en/education/summer-school/2019/workshops-2019/2-anthony-luvera-vincen-beeckman-un-making-images-together-photography-and-collaboration
The underpinning research is found within written contributions and practice research artefacts. The research has been supported with competitively awarded funding from the National Lottery: Big Lottery Fund, and Assembly was commissioned by Brighton Photo Fringe, supported by Arts Council England.
4. Details of the impact
1. Impact on Individuals with Lived Experience of Homelessness
Luvera has enhanced the quality of life of participants by developing and encouraging artistic and social skills through participatory research practices (R1, R2). Collaborator Gerald Mclaverty states:
“My own perceptions of homelessness have changed as a result of working with Anthony. It’s a soul-destroying position to be in, but my work on FAQ makes me feel I’m making a contribution. It gives me a purpose and a real sense of achievement. I have spoken at events at the Houses of Parliament and the Tate Modern…. The sense of achievement from being part of that work and those events is life-changing.” (S1)
Increased confidence has led to Gerald taking up a voluntary retail position, his first employment role in a significant period. Hugh Morley comments:
“There is no doubt in my mind that the advice, support and encouragement I have received from Anthony during our collaboration has improved my life. Anthony has brought out untapped potential in me and our work has given my life profound meaning.” (S1)
Hugh is currently working with Luvera on a photographic book entitled ‘ At Home in the Universe’, evidencing how the work has inspired and supported new forms of artistic expression in individuals who previously did not have access.
2. Impact on Public Understanding
The research has enhanced public understanding of the lived experience of homelessness. It has been exhibited to international audiences in world-renowned galleries. FAQ (R2) at the Tate Exchange attracted 5,012 people, 49% of the whole gallery figure that week, and a 10% lift over the same week in previous years (S2). Evaluation of the event (S3) demonstrates impact on public perceptions, through a ‘dwell time’ (time/display) of 2 minutes plus (national average: 1 minute) and indicative vox pop comments:
*“The shock of understanding what councils aren’t doing to help. 92% of councils haven’t even responded to questions about basic human needs…profound, touching, and upsetting.” (S3)
The show reached a wider audience through BBC Radio Merseyside, The Big Issue, and *Museums Journal (*45,000 readers and 223,000 monthly online views), as well as being archived on the Tate website (circa 2m hits/week).
Assembly and FAQ (R1, R2) reached circa 210,000 people, as well as a number of influential speakers through presentation at the Gallery at Foyles, London, (S4, S6). During the 2 month exhibition, curators Futurecity (S5), shared the work with 10,000 Mailer subscribers and 4,000 Instagram followers. Sharing with their 6,500 Twitter followers, saw 1,000 visits, 1.5% increase in followers, 192 mentions, and 151.6K impressions. The People’s Republic of Stokes Croft exhibition (S7) saw visitor numbers of circa 650 and coverage in The Independent and BBC online (S4).
As a result of the research, during 2020, Luvera worked with journalist Robert Wright on an article about homelessness and the coronavirus crisis: ‘ *The lockdown has transformed life for the homeless – but what happens now?*’ (Financial Times 24 June 2020). The inclusion of assisted self-portraits highlighted the challenges facing people experiencing homelessness in London, and those working for homelessness charities and grassroots organisations to provide services through the pandemic (S8).
3. Impact on Policymakers
Impact at UK government level, is evidenced through Luvera and Mclaverty’s presentation of FAQ to the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Ending Homelessness on 25 June 2019 hosted by Chair, Neil Coyle MP. Islington Borough Council (S6), confirmed policy debate within the Council was stimulated by the work (R1, R2), leading to enhanced communications between disparate Council groups:
“As a result of the Taking Place event, I am aware of support groups relating to homelessness, and groups advocating social/council housing. There is synergy within the objectives of both groups but to date, little collaboration. I will bring these two groups together to focus actions and make better use of Council resources.” (S6)
Dissemination of FAQ (R2) across Exeter City Council led to discussions between cabinet members, and a realisation that Council practices must be more coherent:
“Anthony’s work has significantly changed Council perceptions of the needs of those experiencing homelessness in the City….. Anthony’s work has made us acknowledge that a more coherent strategy for support provision is required.” (S6)
The MoH (S3) and People’s Republic of Stokes Croft indicate their campaign communication with LAs has been influenced with FAQ (R2) providing “ investigatory expertise” and a valuable dataset:
“…our communications with Bristol Council around homelessness have been enhanced. We now have real-world data to authenticate what we are saying.” (S7)
4. Impact on Practitioners and Galleries
Luvera’s research has altered practitioner approaches to commissioning, curating, and exhibiting work (S7). Research with individuals from marginalised backgrounds (R1, R2) has informed his contribution and oversight as Chair of the Education Committee for The Royal Photographic Society:
“A strategic decision was taken to place more emphasis on socially-engaged photography, reflecting Anthony’s impact on the Society.” (S7)
The Curator for Schools & Young People at The Photographer’s Gallery assisted Luvera on Assembly and FAQ (R1, R2) and now implements a successful socially-engaged approach herself, having received funding for a further 3 years of operation (circa £120k):
“The robustness of Anthony’s approach, combined with its inclusive working practices, directly influenced how I work and have been implemented at TPG through workshop delivery and outreach activities.” (S7)
Luvera has shared his work widely (R1, R2, R4) influencing artists in Argentina, Belgium, Latvia, Norway and USA: “It helped me ‘find my voice’ in terms of describing socially-engaged work in funding applications”. (S7)
Documented changes to practice are also evidenced through Luvera’s work with GRAIN, including ‘ Photography for Whom’ (R3) and the annual symposium ‘ The State of Photography’, (90+ attendees from across the UK). The Director of Projects at GRAIN (S9), provides excerpts from the new business plan evidencing policy change directly influenced by Luvera:
“We rewrote our business plan as part of our relationship with Arts Council England. Socially-engaged work is now at the core of the plan and I would be comfortable in saying that is primarily due to the work we have done with Anthony.…. the work is pioneering and important for our current times.” (S9)
5. Sources to corroborate the impact
S1: Interviews: ‘ Impact of Luvera Research on Individuals with Lived Experience of Homelessness’, The Innovation Partnership Ltd, February 2021.
S2: Testimonial letter of support from Head of Learning at Tate Liverpool, Royal Albert Dock Liverpool, Liverpool, L3 4BB.
S3: Testimonial letter of support from Co-founder of Museum of Homelessness, 6th Floor, St Matthews Church, Brixton Hill, London, SW2 1JF.
S4: Hemmings, A., Luvera, A. (2020) ‘ FAQ Final Evaluation Report’.
S5: Testimonial letter of support from Curator at Futurecity, PO Box 77520, London, NIP 3NJ
S6: Interviews: ‘ Impact of Luvera Research at a Local Authority Level’, The Innovation Partnership Ltd, February 2021.
S7: Interviews: ‘ Impact of Luvera Research on Practitioners (Galleries/Artists)’, The Innovation Partnership Ltd, February 2021.
S8: Newspaper article with assisted self-portraits by Luvera: ** ‘The lockdown has transformed life for the homeless – but what happens now?*’ Financial Times 24th June 2020.
S9: Testimonial letter of support from Director at GRAIN Photography Hub, GRAIN Projects.
- Submitting institution
- Coventry University
- Unit of assessment
- 32 - Art and Design: History, Practice and Theory
- Summary impact type
- Societal
- Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
- No
1. Summary of the impact
The game-based learning market is expected to reach $17 billion by 2023. Arnab developed a transdisciplinary game design model to enhance the ability of serious games to be replicated for educational purposes with international impact. The impact of the novel game design model on the practices of beneficiaries such as educational game designers, digital technology industry, and non-expert audiences, respectively, are: 1) impact on game production with an increased rigour in the design and development approach, 2) economic impact in the improved capacity and turnover of start-up, small, and medium businesses in Europe, and 3) impact on practitioners through the upskilling of educators in international, marginalised communities to co-design and co-create game-based learning resources.
2. Underpinning research
Replicating a serious game can be difficult because many games do not follow a standard or specific set of guidelines based upon scientific and pedagogic rigour. Professor Sylvester Arnab from Coventry University investigated how to develop a novel, transdisciplinary (research that infuses knowledge and practice from various fields) and holistic model for serious game design that could be adapted to a range of educational settings.
From 2010 to 2014, Arnab (G1) investigated how to develop a robust methodology for correlating pedagogical constructs with game mechanics through a control trial of 31 participants. Partnering with Herriot-Watt University, Arnab developed a model for Learning Mechanics-Game Mechanics (LM-GM) that was tested with the 31 participants and demonstrated that the LM-GM model was a more rigorous approach compared to other models (R1). In 2014, Arnab partnered with Technology University of Tampere to examine how flow theory (the concept of total absorption in an activity) could be used to analyse educational games quality (R3). An empirical study of 98 students playing ‘RealGame’ (a business simulation game) indicated that the proposed Flow Framework was a useful tool to evaluate the quality of educational games (R3). From 2011 to 2013, Arnab and Clarke used the research findings of G1, R1, R3, and R4 to design and evaluate a game-based intervention about sexual coercion in relationships called PR:EPARe (R2). A randomised control trial of 505 participants suggested that blending interactive game-based approaches in a traditional classroom setting was an effective way of encouraging students to engage with sensitive topics (R2).
From 2014 to 2016, informed by R1-4, Arnab and Clarke developed a transdisciplinary methodology for designing game-based intervention that merged the LM-GM Model with other frameworks used to design and develop PR:EPARe (R2). In 2015, in partnership with Prof. Margarida Romero (University Cote d’ Azure and Laval University), Arnab examined how to incorporate self-determination theory (motivational theory) into LM-GM, producing an adaptable model for mapping motivational constructs to LM-GM that could be used to inform game design (R5). From 2015 to the present, Arnab and Clarke used the research of R1 to R5 and G1, to investigate how to simplify the transdisciplinary model for non-game designers through the GameChangers Initiative (G3). Arnab and Clarke tested the simplified model with 122 Coventry University students. The students fed back that the game design approach enabled them to discover the importance of empathy and creativity through the process (G3).
In 2017, Arnab, Lameras and Clarke investigated how teachers could empathically and inclusively design, game-based learning resources for students in rural Malaysia (G4, R6). Arnab and partners from Universiti Malaysia Sarawak (UNIMAS) in Malaysia engaged with 600 teachers, educators and students to support the co-creation of over 20 game-based learning resources. This aligns with UNESCO’s emphasis upon teacher upskilling as a key instrument for addressing Sustainable Development Goal for equitable and inclusive quality education.
Arnab’s preceding research (R1-5) also led to the Beaconing project (2016-2019 G2, R6) that investigated ‘anytime anywhere’ learning with over 6,000 teachers and students in 10 European countries (including Poland and Romania). The project empowered teachers to co-produce their own gamified lesson plans using the resulting authoring tool. 87% of students (1,787 learners) that participated in the research, reported high engagement in the resources; and 84% affirmed that their learning performance had improved.
3. References to the research
References
R1. Arnab, S., Lim, T., Carvalho, M. B., Bellotti, F., de Freitas, S., Louchart, S., Suttie, N., Berta, R. and De Gloria, A. (2015) 'Mapping learning and game mechanics for serious games analysis'. British Journal of Educational Technology 46 (2), 391–411. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12113
R2. Arnab, S. and Clarke, S. (2017) 'Towards a trans-disciplinary methodology for a game-based intervention development process'. British Journal of Educational Technology 48 (2) 279-312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12377
R3: Kiili, K., Lainema, T,. de Freitas, S. and Arnab, S. (2014) 'Flow framework for analyzing the quality of educational games'. Entertainment Computing 5 (4), 367-377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2014.08.002
R4. Baalsrud Hauge, J. M., Stanescu, I. A., Arnab, S., Ger, P. M., Lim, T., Serrano-Laguna, A., Lameras, P., Hendrix, M., Kiili, K., Ninaus, M., de Freitas, S., Mazzetti, A., Dahlbom, A. and Degano, C. (2015) 'Learning Analytics Architecture to Scaffold Learning Experience through Technology-based Method'. International Journal of Serious Games 2 (1), 29-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17083/ijsg.v2i1.38
R5. Proulx, J-N., Romero, M. and Arnab, S. (2017) 'Learning Mechanics and Game Mechanics Under the Perspective of Self-Determination Theory to Foster Motivation in Digital Game Based Learning'. Simulation and Gaming 48 (1), 81-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878116674399
R6. Arnab, S. 2020, Game Science in Hybrid Learning Spaces. Digital Games, Simulation and Learning, no. 6. 1st edn. UK: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. ISBN 9781138239753
Grants
G1. Arnab S. (Principal Researcher (2010 to 2012), Scientific Coordinator (2012 to 2014)) (2010 to 2014) GALA - Games and Learning Allianc e. European Commission: FP7-ICT - Specific Programme: Cooperation - Information and communication technologies, grant number: 258169. Total grant amount: €7,592,571.00 (£6,309,806.13), funding to Coventry University: €255,900.00 (£212,665.70). Available from < https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/258169> [18 December 2020]
G2. Arnab, S. (PI) and Lameras, P. (CoI) (2016 to 2019) BEACONING - Breaking Educational Barriers with Contextualised, Pervasive and Gameful Learning. European Commission: Horizon 2020 Innovation Action, grant number: 687676. Total grant amount: €7,047,298.75 (£5,201,611.21), funding to Coventry University: €784,987.50 (£579,399.27). Available from < https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/687676> and < https://www.coventry.ac.uk/research/research-directories/current-projects/2018/beaconing/> [18 December 2020]
G3: Arnab, S. (PI) and Clarke, S. (Researcher) (2014 to present) GameChangers. HEFCE (now Research England): Catalyst Fund Call A: Small-scale, ‘experimental’ innovation in learning and teaching and match funding from Coventry University, grant number: PK44. Total grant amount: £66,588.10, funding from HEFCE: £33,294.00, match funding from Coventry University: £33,294.10. Available from < https://gamify.org.uk/> [18 December 2020].
G4: Arnab, S. (PI), Lameras, P. (CoI) and Clarke S. (CoI) (2017 to 2019) CreativeCulture - Creative and Participatory Transcultural Practices and Problem Solving Through Game Design and Computational Thinking. Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC): (UKRI-ODA) Newton Fund UK-SEA and Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia (MoHE), grant number: AH/P013937/1. Total grant amount: £172,000.00, funding from AHRC: £80,640.00, funding from MoHE: £91,360.00. Available from < https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=AH%2FP013937%2F1> and < http://creativeculture.my> [18 December 2020]
G5: Arnab, S. (PI) and Clarke, S. (Researcher) (2020 to 2021) CreativeCulture 4.0 - Transforming 21st century teaching and learning of STEM in Malaysia through creative play and gamification towards Education 4. Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC): Newton Fund Impact Scheme and MIGHT, Malaysia, grant number: AH/V004077/1. Total grant amount: £167,000.00, funding from AHRC: £74,809.00, funding from MIGHT: £92,191.00. Available from< https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=AH%2FV004077%2F1> and < http://creativeculture.my> [18 December 2020]
G6: Arnab, S. (PI), (2020 -2023) ACES - A Community-Centred Educational Model for developing Social Resilience: Playfulness towards an inclusive, safe and resilient society. Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC): (UKRI-ODA) Global Challenges Research Fund, grant number: ES/T004789/1. Total grant amount: £1,371,786.00, funding to Coventry University: £845,000.00. Available from < https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=ES%2FT004789%2F1> and < https://aces.gchangers.org/> [18 December 2020]
Awards and accolades
A1. Gamification Awards (2020) Gamification Award for Education and Learning 2019. Awarded to the GameChangers Project (G3). Available from < https://gamificationawards.org/blog/gamification-in-education-learning-award-winner/> [18 December 2020]
A2. Gamification Awards (2020) Gamification Award for Software 2019. Awarded to the Beaconing Project (G2). Available from < https://gamificationawards.org/blog/gamification-software-award-winner/>
The research references listed in this case study are from academic peer-reviewed articles, books, reports, and digital monographs. The grants listed in this case study were awarded through a competitive, peer-reviewed process.
4. Details of the impact
The international impact on the practices of beneficiaries such as educational game designers, digital technology industry, and non-expert audiences are: 1) impact on game production with an increased rigour in the design and development approach, 2) economic impact from the improved capacity and turnover of start-up, small, and medium businesses, and 3) impact on practitioners through the upskilling of teachers in international, marginalised communities to co-design and co-create game-based learning resources.
1. Impact on game production through increased scientific and pedagogical rigour of game design methodology
The LM-GM model (R1) was used by researchers internationally, to enhance the rigour of educational game design. In 2015 researchers from Ulster University and Worcester University (S1) adopted the LM-GM model (R1) to inform the design of ‘Circuit Warz’, a game for teaching electrical engineering principles to A-level and first-year undergraduate students. The use of the LM-GM model (R1) enabled the researchers to map the pedagogical elements of Circuit Warz with the game elements of the model, leading to the global release of Circuit Warz. Circuit Warz is now published for PC/VR platforms on gaming websites (including STEAM and Itch) with over 6,000 downloads worldwide to date. Circuit Warz won best overall game at the prestigious 4th International Game Competition at the European Conference of Game-Based Learning in Glasgow, Oct 2016 (S1), with the game being praised for good aesthetics and challenging learning puzzles. Circuit Warz has also been translated into Portuguese as a teaching aid for students at the Universidad Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC), Brazil (S1, S2). Researchers at UFSC used the LM-GM model to develop a new photovoltaic systems game that was tested with 18 students through 30 game sessions (S2). 94% of the students agreed or strongly agreed that the game had been useful for establishing their knowledge of photovoltaic systems.
1. Impact on economic growth and innovation by stimulating start-ups/SMEs in Europe
Arnab used the research outcomes of R1 to R5 to develop European-wide, industry standards for game applications through the Beaconing project (G2). The project led to seven European start-ups/SMEs expanding job creation, turnover, spin-off products, and recognition (S3, S4). Geomotion Games (Spain) was a one-person start-up, who since being involved with the project employed four additional people and significantly increased their turnover (from €7 thousand to €40 thousand in 2019). Informed by the research outcomes in Beaconing (R6), Geomotion has also released a spin-off product, PlayVisit, a geolocation game authoring tool (Monthly Recurring Revenue of €1,250) (S5). PlayVisit has been used by the municipal authority in La Ramblas, Barcelona, to develop a location-based retail experience that attracted 700 participants into the area, and expanded the customer base of participating retailers (S5, R6). In January 2020, the learning approach developed by the Beaconing project won the Gamification Award for Software 2019, demonstrating the recognition of its influence at an industrial level (A2).
1. Impact on practitioners through the upskilling of educators in the co-creation of game-based learning resources that are empathic to the needs of marginalised communities internationally
The game design methodology from R1, R2, R3, R6 and G3, has been adapted in Malaysia through the CreativeCulture project (G4, S6). The project provided over 600 teachers and students from rural schools in Borneo with access to game-based learning techniques and practices (R6, S6). Participating teachers developed over 20 game-based learning resources; co-produced practical game templates and guidelines; and created a set of playing cards for teaching game design (S6, S7, R6). The project also enabled educators at UNIMAS to embed Arnab’s game design methodology (R1-3, R6, G3) in the Masters Programme in Learning Sciences and establish the first Gamification Centre in Malaysia (S6). The Centre provides teachers with a space to practice game-based learning methods in schools in Borneo, to enable the techniques to be replicated in their own schools (S6). CreativeCulture generated press coverage in Malaysia, which in turn led to the Department of Education collaborating with Arnab and UNIMAS upon the CreativeCulture 4.0 project (G5). The project involves training 400 teachers in game-based learning methods by the end of 2021 (S6). The success of CreativeCulture led to the development of the ACES project (G6). The ACES project is rolling-out Arnab’s transdisciplinary, game-based learning approach across education settings in Malaysia, Vietnam and Indonesia, and help these countries to achieve Sustainable Development Goal 4: ‘Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all’. In January 2020, the GameChangers initiative (G3) and the adaptation of the project methodology in the CreativeCulture project (G6), was recognised for its international impact by winning the Gamification Award for Education and Learning 2019 (A1). Arnab’s game-based learning methodology (R1-6, G1-6) has also been included as a key resource for game-based learning by the EU School Education Gateway (S8).
5. Sources to corroborate the impact
S1. Reader, Ulster University (2020) Influence of the Learning Mechanics-Game Mechanics Model (LM-GM Model) on Circuit Warz Testimonial letter to Coventry University
S2. Coordinator of the Applied Research Laboratory, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) (2020) Influence of the Learning Mechanics-Game Mechanics Model (LM-GM Model) upon the development and application of Phototype testimonial letter to Coventry University
S3: BEACONING Project (2018 to 2019) Breaking Educational Barriers with Contextualised, Pervasive and Gameful Learning, Periodic Technical Report Part B. European Commission. SME impact in turnover and employees see p. 44.
S4. BEACONING Project (2019) Beaconing: Dissemination and exploitation of results (confidential report). European Commission. Impact summary see p. 18.
S5. Chief Executive Officer, Geomotion Games (2020) Influence of the Beaconing project on Geomotion Games testimonial letter to Coventry University
S6. Senior Lecturer and Associate Professor, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak (2020) Influence of the CreativeCulture project upon Teaching and Learning practices in rural Malaysian schools testimonial letter to Coventry University
S7. Evidence of teacher-created resources to showcase empowerment of teachers in innovative educational practices to corroborate S5.
S8: Evidence of how R1-6 and G1-6 have been included as a key resource for game-based learning by the EU School Education Gateway (available from < https://www.schooleducationgateway.eu> [18 December 2020]).
- Submitting institution
- Coventry University
- Unit of assessment
- 32 - Art and Design: History, Practice and Theory
- Summary impact type
- Societal
- Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
- No
1. Summary of the impact
Monopolies of large commercial publishing companies are impeding diversity in the publishing industry and the development of alternative publishing models. Adema, Hall, and Shaw’s research has generated impact by shaping Higher Education (HE) policy debate on open access (OA) publishing, and by changing practices within the academic and creative publishing industries by formulating new models of open scholar-led publishing and innovative forms of (hybrid) publishing. Beneficiaries include 1) HE policy makers (UKRI, Research England) looking to advance policy to support OA book publishing, 2) scholar-led and not-for-profit presses, benefitting from the collective networks, platforms, and support-infrastructure created (via the ROAC, COPIM, and ScholarLed initiatives), and 3) photographers and photography organisations (The Photographers’ Gallery, APHE), seeing extended engagement from the application of open publishing and exhibition models.
2. Underpinning research
Dr Janneke Adema, Professor Gary Hall, and Professor Jonathan Shaw’s research at Coventry University has supported scholars, presses, libraries, and cultural institutions to devise open, not-for-profit publishing models, and to experiment with innovative publication formats.
OA publishing is increasingly embraced by scholars and publishers and mandated by funders to improve access to research for scholars and the general public. However, Adema, Hall, and Shaw’s research (R1-5) indicates continued challenges:
Monopolies of large commercial publishing companies are impeding diversity in the publishing industry and the development of alternative publishing models (e.g., scholar-led and not-for-profit presses);
A focus on printed books and print-based formats (e.g., PDF) is limiting experimentation with digital and hybrid (print+digital) scholarly publication formats;
Policymaking around OA focuses on articles. Access to books remains restricted;
Globally, access to knowledge and to funding to pay publishing charges remains unequal.
In 2016, Adema, consulting for Jisc, conducted the first in-depth study of presses run by scholars (a.k.a scholar-led presses), given limited existing knowledge about this new publishing model and the missions, goals, needs, and future requirements of scholar-led presses (R1). R1 highlights that alternative, open, and experimental publishing models are essential to guarantee diversity in academic publishing and foster innovations (including around sustainable OA business models). The study recommended that HE funders should 1) further legitimise scholar-led publishing as a model; 2) support community building among scholar-led presses; and 3) stimulate knowledge sharing among this community. These recommendations were further modelled by Adema and Moore (previously Kings College London, now Coventry University) in R2 through an analysis of the Radical Open Access Collective, a membership advocacy network for scholar-led OA presses that further professionalised in response to R1’s recommendations and grew its membership from 23 to 70+.
In R4, Hall encouraged scholars to critically and creatively experiment with open and collaborative publishing practices, including setting up their own OA presses (following the model of Open Humanities Press (OHP) that Hall co-founded and described in R4). Adema and Hall’s research (R1 and R4) influenced the establishment of ScholarLed, a consortium of 5 established scholar-led presses, changing standard single-press models to more collective practices. Based on R1 the Knowledge Exchange group of national organisations supporting digital infrastructures for HE asked Adema to write a report (R3), as part of which she formulated recommendations and action plans for HE funders and stakeholders, together forming first steps towards a European roadmap for OA books.
Hall and Shaw’s research (R4-5) sought to change how knowledge is created, accessed, and shared through forms of experimental and hybrid publishing. Alternative forms of knowledge were presented by Hall and OHP’s ‘living’ digital book series, imagining books as a continuous process that can be updated and remixed online, challenging the tradition of the fixed, static, printed object (R4). Similarly, Shaw used hybrid and living approaches to develop new publishing models in photography (R5) and to remix and curate large archives (e.g., Europeana) to create an interactive photographic open book (R5). R5 outlined an ‘ open and hybrid publishing’ model, providing cultural institutions opportunities to transcend the ‘consumer’ model of books; instead the institutions themselves become active authors, editors, and publishers.
3. References to the research
R1. Adema, J. and Stone, G. (2017) Changing Publishing Ecologies. A Landscape Study of New University Presses and Academic-led Publishing. JISC, pp. 102. Available from < http://repository.jisc.ac.uk/6666/1/Changing-publishing-ecologies-report.pdf> [16 February 2021]
R2. Adema, J. and Moore, S. A. (2018) 'Collectivity and Collaboration: Imagining New Forms of Communality to Create Resilience in Scholar-led Publishing'. Insights 31 (3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.399
R3. Adema, J. (2019) Towards a Roadmap for Open Access Monographs: A Knowledge Exchange Report, pp. 44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2644997. French translation: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02430204
R4. Hall, G. (2016) Pirate Philosophy: For A Digital Posthumanities [online]. Massachusetts: MIT Press. Available from < http://mitpress.mit.edu/books/pirate-philosophy> [16 February 2021]
R5. Shaw, J. (2014) Open and Hybrid Publishing. Multi-component item (T-Other) submitted to REF 2021. This includes Photomediations: An Open Book [online] available from < http://www.photomediationsopenbook.net/> [16 February 2021]; and (2014) NEWFOTOSCAPES. Birmingham: Library of Birmingham. pp.213. ISBN: 978‐07093 02681.
Grants
G1. Adema, J. (Co-PI) and Hall, G. (Co-PI) (November 2019 to October 2022) Community-led Open Publications Infrastructures for Monographs (COPIM). Research England: Research England Development (RED) Fund. Total grant amount: £2,202,948.00. Available from < https://www.copim.ac.uk> and < https://www.coventry.ac.uk/research/research-directories/current-projects/2020/copim/> [16 February 2021]. Research England (2019) ‘Research England awards £2.2m to project to improve and increase open access publishing’. Research England Press Release [archived online content] 14 June 2019. Available from < https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20200923112548/https://re.ukri.org/news-opinions-events/news/re-awards-2-2m-to-project-to-improve-open-access-publishing/> <16 February 2021>.
G2. Adema, J. (Co-PI) and Hall, G. (Co-PI) (November 2019 to October 2022) Community-led Open Publications Infrastructures for Monographs (COPIM). The Arcadia Philanthropic Trust, grant awards number: 4192 . Total grant amount: £800,000.00. Available from < https://www.copim.ac.uk> and < https://www.coventry.ac.uk/research/research-directories/current-projects/2020/copim/> [18 December 2020]
G3. Shaw, J. – pilot lead for ‘Open and Hybrid Publishing Pilot’ within the Europeana Space: Best Practice Network: Spaces of Possibility for the Creative Reuse of Digital Cultural Content (ESpace) (PI Sarah Whatley) European Commission: ICT Policy Support Programme, Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme, grant number: 621037.
(January 2014 to December 2017) Total Europeana Space grant amount: €4,955,849.00 (£4,093,035.69). Available from < https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/621037> and < https://www.europeana-space.eu/> [17 December 2020]
The research references listed in this case study are from academic peer-reviewed articles, books, reports, and digital monographs. The grants listed in this case study were awarded through a competitive, peer-reviewed process.
4. Details of the impact
1. Shaping UK Higher Education OA policy debate
In 2016, Adema became a member of the Universities UK OA Monographs working group as a result of her research for R1 and at the recommendation of Jisc. This working group was established to support and monitor progress towards OA publishing for books. R1 and R3 were important to several of the working group’s policy reports (S1). In 2018, UKRI announced a review of its OA policies, to incorporate monographs, book chapters, and edited collections into its policy requirements. R1 and R3 and the work of the UUK OA Monograph Group informed UKRI’s draft OA policy position, outlined in its consultation document (S2). Specifically, as a UKRI Senior Policy Advisor confirms (S1), R1 informed UKRI’s recognition of the broad range of business models within humanities publishing and ‘the importance of maintaining and encouraging a diverse publishing ecology which includes commercial publishers and new university presses, as well as scholar-led initiatives’ (S1). They estimate the monographs element of the policy to impact around 500 books published yearly. S2 will also be submitted as evidence to inform the development of the OA policy for research outputs submitted to the UK-wide research assessment after REF 2021.
UKRI’s Senior Policy Advisor invited Adema, Hall, and the ScholarLed consortium to submit a business case (informed by R1) to the Research England Development Fund (G1). The Community-led Open Publications Infrastructures for Monographs (COPIM) project was awarded £3M in combined co-funding with the charitable organisation Arcadia (G2). The UKRI Consultation (S2) referenced COPIM, and as S1 indicates, its findings are already, and will continue to ‘ inform policy implementation for both the UKRI OA policy and the OA policy for the national research assessment exercise after REF 2021’.
1. Changing practices within the academic publishing industry by formulating new models of open scholar-led publishing
R4 describes Hall’s launch of Open Humanities Press (OHP). In 2015, Adema and Hall organised the Radical Open Access Conference, identifying and bringing together similar scholar-led presses, many set up inspired by OHP and Hall’s research, which helped Meson Press ‘ grow its reputation internationally’, where Mattering Press adapted Hall’s publishing model to ‘become a leading book publisher in the field of STS’ (S3-4). Following the conference, extending from Hall’s collective scholar-led publishing model (R4), the Radical Open Access Collective (ROAC) was formed, a membership organisation that enabled the now 70+ scholar-led projects to scale up from working individually, providing them with the collective voice, resources, and expertise to support their work (described in R2). The mutual reliance and cooperation the ROAC provides is demonstrated by its members, with Internet Policy Review’s Managing Editor stating: ‘Our experience [of the ROAC] has been excellent. [It] is pushing the agenda of uncompromising open access (…). We’re looking forward to collaborating more with the other members of the collective into the future’ (S5).
R1 resulted in significant conceptual impact in the OA publishing field, with presses increasingly starting to self-identify as academic- or scholar-led (S6), and funders acknowledging R1 as a key publishing model (S1-2). Adema and Hall were co-founders of the ScholarLed consortium of presses, which is further developing alternative business models and infrastructures for OA books through the COPIM project (G1-2).
1. Changing practices within the creative industries by formulating new models and forms of (hybrid) publishing
In R4 Hall describes OHP’s ‘Living Books about Life’ series, which repurposed existing OA content via openly editable wiki-books. This experiment impacted the publishing practices of authors and presses, resulting in 3 international adaptations (S7). R4 inspired Mattering Press to conduct experiments with publishing formats (S3), and Meson Press to conduct ‘alternative, open forms of peer reviews’ (S4). Shaw’s ‘open and hybrid publishing’ model (R5) has benefitted both photographers and photography organisations. The Photographer’s Gallery applied R5 to revision of their gallery space and to launch two interrelated projects: #FolioFriday and The Open Door programme. Through these initiatives the Gallery brought ‘approximately 8,000 individual visitors into direct conversations with photographers’ and helped ‘ support and amplify practice of over 400 photographers and photographic organisations’. Shaw’s research (R5) also influenced the development of their Unthinking Photography online publishing platform, which received a nomination by the International Center of Photography for an Infinity Award (2017) (S8). Shaw’s model also provided membership communities such as The Association for Photography in Higher Education (APHE) opportunities ‘ to see beyond the confines of the ‘consumer’ model of books’ and to ‘create an open and hybrid model for the co-production of content with the APHE community’ (S9). This led APHE to focus engagement and dissemination activities, nearly tripling their membership and growing their income by 150% (S9).
5. Sources to corroborate the impact
S1. Senior Policy Advisor, Research England (2021), Influence of the research of Dr Janneke Adema upon the development of the open access policy for UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) and the open access policy for the national research assessment after the REF 2021 testimonial Letter to Coventry University
S2. UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) (2020) UKRI Open Access Review: Consultation. 13 February 2020. UK Research and Innovation (UKRI), pp.48. Available from < https://www.ukri.org/files/funding/oa/open-access-review-consultation/> [18 December 2020]
R3 is referenced on p. 26 and G1-2 on pp. 34-35.
S3. Trustee and Editor, Mattering Press (2021) Influence of Professor Gary Hall’s Open Access Publishing Model upon the Development of Mattering Press Testimonial Letter to Coventry University
S4. Co-Founder, Meson Press (2020) Influence of Professor Gary Hall’s Open Access Publishing Model upon the Development of Meson Press Testimonial Letter to Coventry University
S5. Dubois, F. (2018) ‘OASPA Member Spotlight: The Internet Policy Review’ [interview by L. Williams] [online] available from < https://oaspa.org/oaspa-member-spotlight-the-internet-policy-review/> [18 December 2020]
S6. Academic and policy sources written by publishers and publishing intermediaries that reference R1 and academic-led publishing as a new publishing model.
S7. Three examples of the adaptation of: JISC and Open Humanities Press Living Books about Life Series [online] available from < http://www.livingbooksaboutlife.org> [18 December 2020].
Animal Studies: Living Bibliography The Living Bibliography of Animal Studies [online] available from < http://www.lbanimalstudies.org.uk/index.php?title=Main_Page> [18 December 2020]
Living Books Book about History Living Books about History [online] available from < https://www.livingbooksabouthistory.ch/en/> [18 December 2020]
En busca del quelite perdido En busca del quelite perdido [online] available from < https://enbuscadelqueliteperdido.net/historia-y-creditos/> [18 December 2020]
S8. Director, The Photographers’ Gallery (2020) The Influence of Jonathan Shaw’s Research upon the Publishing Practices of The Photographers' Gallery Testimonial Letter to Coventry University
S9. Former Secretary of the APHE Executive Committee, The Association for Photography in Higher Education (APHE) (2020) Influence of Jonathan Shaw’s Research upon the Membership of The Association for Photography in Higher Education (APHE) Testimonial Letter to Coventry University