Skip to main

Impact case study database

The impact case study database allows you to browse and search for impact case studies submitted to the REF 2021. Use the search and filters below to find the impact case studies you are looking for.

Search and filter

Filter by

  • Leeds Beckett University
   None selected
  • 32 - Art and Design: History, Practice and Theory
   None selected
   None selected
   None selected
   None selected
   None selected
   None selected
Waiting for server
Download currently selected sections for currently selected case studies (spreadsheet) (generating)
Download currently selected case study PDFs (zip) (generating)
Download tags for the currently selected case studies (spreadsheet) (generating)
Currently displaying text from case study section
Showing impact case studies 1 to 3 of 3
Submitting institution
Leeds Beckett University
Unit of assessment
32 - Art and Design: History, Practice and Theory
Summary impact type
Societal
Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
No

1. Summary of the impact

Harold Offeh’s non-hierarchical approach to participatory arts and ‘call-and-response’ curation of Tate’s 2013 Summer School provoked what Tate Schools and Teachers Curator Leanne Turvey described as ‘ a massive wake-up call’, leading to changes in policy and practice in Tate’s Learning teams. According to Turvey, Offeh’s work ‘ transformed our team practice, from recruitment of staff, to how we programme, who we work with, how we can diversify what artists we share, which artists we work with… [and] the way we describe what our programme aims are…our goal is that all young people find themselves in everything they see at Tate.’

2. Underpinning research

Harold Offeh employs various practice-as-research methods – performance, video, photography, participatory and social engagement – to produce novel open-ended dialogues that emphasise process over product, in contrast to traditional forms of outcome-driven art.

Working with young people and adults in gallery contexts including Tate Modern (3.1; 3.2), Peckham Platform (3.3; 3.4) and Site Gallery (3.5), Offeh has developed innovative approaches to participatory and social art research, creating contexts of sociality and community as grounds for learning. In order to address complex issues – historical memory, identity, race, power and authority – Offeh designs sensitive, multi-faceted interventions such as re-enactments and workshops, creating an equal relationship between artist and participants. The aim is to engender constructive dialogue and develop critical reflection through collaboratively produced responses, prompting new thinking amongst participants about how to address societal challenges. Characterised by a call-and-response approach to dialogue – a form of communication rooted in African diaspora and other cultures – Offeh’s curatorial and artistic interventions prompt participants to take active roles and become creative producers and critical thinkers in their own right.

Through research and development undertaken for ‘Down at the Bamboo Club’ at Picture This in Bristol, Offeh identified re-enactment and curation as effective ways of achieving a non-hierarchical relationship between artist and participants in social art and participatory projects. (3.6) His use of curation and re-enactment (the ‘call’) is the basis of shared learning experiences in social art projects and their consequent collaborative outcomes (the ‘response’). Offeh’s foregrounding of collaboration, co-operation and participation in social art practice resulted in three separate commissions from the cultural organisation Peckham Platform. (3.3; 3.4) For example, for the social art research project ‘Futurama’, Offeh curated an exhibition of designed objects, video and images. This exhibition was the ‘call’: a departure point and catalyst for the participants’ ‘response’, leading to them collectively re-imagining and re-designing their local urban setting, creating street seating and lighting made in collaboration with the design team Glass Hill. Founding Director of Peckham Platform, Emily Druiff explains how Offeh ‘ brings a kind of bonding between a group through the methods that he’s using’. Indeed, Offeh’s work is seen by Peckham Platform as a ‘ benchmark’, an essential point of reference for all work they commission.

Similarly, for the exhibition and social art project ‘Cutting Shapes’ at Site Gallery (part of the AHRC Connected Communities Festival), Offeh curated an exhibition of video works complementing the project’s themes of youth, identity and internet cultures. This exhibition was ‘the call’, followed by a series of participatory events during which Offeh worked with participants on a series of ‘responses’. Thus, a non-hierarchical space for shared learning was created, with Offeh occupying the role of participant and host/lead artist simultaneously.

By occupying multiple positions – engaging with participants at various levels of immersion, from host artist to peer and participant – Offeh can observe from different perspectives the impact of the activity, which serves as a model for a society in which identity is not so rigidly defined by the roles and vocations of its citizens. This has a political dimension at time when many vocations and jobs are, at best, precarious signifiers of a person’s value.

3. References to the research

3.1 Offeh, H. (2012-13) Live Art Salon, Exhibition, live art performance and participatory art project commissioned by Tate Learning for Tate Modern, London, 9th March 2012 (Live performance).

3.2 Offeh, H. (2013) Call and Response Dinner, Exhibition, live event and participatory project commissioned by Tate Modern, London, 29th July 2013 (Live event).

3.3 Offeh, H. (2010) Futurama, Curated exhibition, social art project and street furniture designs commissioned by Peckham Platform through their community-led co-commissioning process, London, 17th September – 27th November 2010.

3.4 Offeh, H. (2016) Platform Press House, Exhibition, social art project, film, live art, sound art, publications, commissioned by Peckham Platform through their community-led co-commissioning process, London, 2nd June – 31st July 2016.

3.5 Offeh, H. (2015) Cutting Shapes, Curated exhibition, social art project, performances and films, commissioned by Site Gallery, Sheffield, as part of the AHRC Connected Communities Festival with support from the Paul Hamlyn Foundation, 16th June – 18th July 2015.

3.6 Offeh, H. (2008-20) Down at the Bamboo Club, Exhibition, film, participation, re-enactment and commissioning for Picture This, Bristol, in collaboration with The Georgian House, Wesley’s New Room and the Bristol Black Archives.

4. Details of the impact

Instigating change within Tate’s S&T programme through raising awareness

Having commissioned Offeh’s ‘Live Art Salon’ and ‘Call and Response Dinner’, Tate’s Schools and Teachers (S&T) team commissioned Offeh to curate their 2013 Summer School, a learning platform attended by 30 teachers and artist-educators. Offeh’s project was the catalyst which ‘… set in motion a series of changes’, in S&T, Curator Leanne Turvey stating that it raised awareness of the lack of diversity amongst S&T’s staff and audiences, who ‘ were unable to talk about anything around race at all’. (5.1) An S&T report states: ‘ Summer School 2013 highlighted a significant lack of take- up from BAME teachers, made all the more stark by the fact that many of the artists contributing to the school were black and all the participants white. This circumstance has reinforced our resolve to address the issue.’ (5.2)

Initiating new research and training within S&T

This new awareness prompted an internal review; S&T approached Professor Uvanney Maylor to conduct research with Tate Learning on three areas for improvement identified following Offeh’s project:

  • a need to attract more diverse candidates to the team.

  • a need to ensure we are inviting and attracting a more diverse range of teachers into the programme

  • the need to support and explore difficult conversations about race and cultural difference – both in the gallery and in the classroom.’ (5.2)

New practice-as-research on race and language has been undertaken at Tate and in 2016 a new Collaborative Doctoral Partnership was formed ‘… to improve access to and participation in programme activity by BAME teachers, [raising] awareness of race and cultural difference with teachers more widely.’ (5.2) Since Offeh’s project, S&T have undertaken additional training from specialists: Gendered Intelligence, Rape Crisis and Xtend UK.

New programming and resources to explore race and cultural difference

To address the third area, S&T began programming more practitioners concerned with relevant issues, including Evan Ifekoya and Professor Maylor’s ‘Art and Language’ Study Day for 30 teachers (2015) (5.3); and ‘Reconstructing the Black Image: An evening with Gordon de la Mothe’ (2016), to ‘ improve the experience of Black and minority ethnic students.’ (5.2) These events were supported by new online and print resources on race and language at Tate Modern and Britain. (5.4; 5.5)

New S&T Audience Action Plan

In 2014, to address the first and second areas, S&T developed an Audience Action Plan ‘ to increase BAME artists and teachers to access the programme,’ committing to undertake further, ‘ demographic research to ascertain BAME representation within the arts/learning at university level, trainee and qualified teachers’ and within gallery education; implement diversity training for the Schools and Teachers team; action a recruitment policy to research and attract applications from BAME candidates with a view to diversifying workforce; broaden diversity of artists commissioned and recruited to the programme’. (5.2) Thus, all S&T areas – communications, recruitment, staff retention – were reviewed to avoid unintended exclusion of individuals.

Staff recruitment changes

S&T reviewed all areas of recruitment practice, including: advertising, language, unconscious bias, staff support, retention and BAME staff experience. (5.2) Consequently, a Recruitment Working Group was formed and a new action plan devised to promote diversity across all areas of recruitment – this is now policy across all six teams in Tate’s Learning department. (5.1) A new Terms of Reference document (5.6) and a Commitments Document were created establishing principles for positive action – now part of the induction pack for all Learning staff. Its first section states: ‘ ACT NOW We will employ more BAME, non-binary, queer, trans** and disabled artists’. (5.7)

Changes to recruitment for workshop artists

S&T ‘ totally changed the way that we recruit new artists into the programme’ (5.9), [taking] positive action to encourage applications from black, ethnic minority, and disabled applicants as these groups are currently underrepresented in the cultural sector.’ (5.2) Since 2016, working with HR, the diversity manager, and Tate’s BAME network, S&T have used a nomination process to recruit workshop artists, ‘ to better welcome, support and include BAME and disabled artists when at Tate.’ (5.2) Due to increased recruitment of BAME and disabled artists, 150,000 teachers and students (5.9) now work directly with, or receive resources created by, a more diverse range of practitioners. Curator Amy McKelvie says this has enriched the experience of hundreds of thousands of teacher/student-visitors, expanding ideas of what art is and who can be an artist. (5.9)

Reflecting on the impact of Offeh’s 2013 Summer School on Tate’s S&T’s policies, Turvey said: ‘ it really has transformed our team practice, from recruitment of staff, to how we programme, who we work with, how we can diversify what artists we share, which artists we work with … he did have a real impact.’ (5.1) In 2019 Offeh’s contribution to society was recognised with a £60,000 Paul Hamlyn Visual Arts Award. (5.9)

5. Sources to corroborate the impact

5.1 Interview transcript: Turvey, L. (2020) Interview with Leanne Turvey, Schools and Teachers Programme Curator, Tate. Interviewed by Z. Worth for Leeds Beckett University, 29 March.

5.2 Internal Report: Tate Learning Schools and Teachers Team (2018) Narrative of development of a re-focusing of the Schools and Teachers programme to foster a more inclusive invitation to people from BAME backgrounds, London: Tate Britain & Tate Modern.

5.3 Details of Study Day: Tate Learning (2015) Art and Language, London: Tate Britain, 20 March, [Study Day convened by Evan Ifekoya and Professor Uvanney Maylor].

5.4 Student Resources: Ifekoya, E. (2015) Learning Resources, ‘B is for Black’ and ‘O is for Ori’, Tate Britain, London: Tate.

5.5 Teachers’ Resource: Ifekoya, E. (2016) Learning Resources, ‘Key Words’, Tate Britain, London: Tate.

5.6 Internal document: Tate Learning, (2017) Terms of Reference, London: Tate Britain & Tate Modern.

5.7 Staff induction document: Tate Learning, (2017) Commitments, London: Tate Britain & Tate Modern.

5.8 Interview transcript: McKelvie, A. (2020) Interview with Amy McKelvie, Schools and Teachers Programme Curator, Tate. Interviewed by Z. Worth for Leeds Beckett University, 12 June.

5.9 Paul Hamlyn Foundation announces Harold Offeh as £60,000 Visual Arts Award winner in 2019: https://www.phf.org.uk/artist/harold-offeh/

Submitting institution
Leeds Beckett University
Unit of assessment
32 - Art and Design: History, Practice and Theory
Summary impact type
Societal
Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
No

1. Summary of the impact

Hafeda’s social art practice generated benefits for diverse communities in London, Portugal, Brazil and Lebanon. ‘Shop of Possibilities’ (SoP), an art- and play-space commissioned by South London Gallery (SLG), improved the development of 484 children, providing training and employment. An independent report advising the Greater London Authority cites SoP as best-practice, informing its investment of £873,299. Hafeda’s work with Roma communities in Braga initiated a mediation group to improve community relations. Hafeda’s work ‘ inspired and instigated’ curator Amanda Abi Khalil’s commissioning of five social artworks in marginalised communities in Rio de Janeiro and for refugee children on the Syrian border.

2. Underpinning research

Mohamad Hafeda uses site-specific participatory art and architecture to negotiate sites of conflict, addressing issues of refuge, displacement, borders and spatial rights. Hafeda and Reem Charif are co-founders of Febrik, a two-person research vehicle for developing participatory art and design projects exploring the dynamics of urban space in relation to marginalised groups.

By using play methodologies and architectural strategies to intervene in contested urban spaces, Hafeda’s community participation projects instigate propositional thinking, helping people envision changes to their social and physical environment. For example, Febrik ‘s art and design workshops resulted in collaborative outputs – events, temporary art installations, permanent play structures – as well as proposing new urban design policies. This novel methodology evolved from site-specific projects in Palestinian refugee camps in the Middle East: Burj el Barajneh, Lebanon (2003-05); Nahr el Bared, Lebanon (2007-10, in partnership with the United Nations); and Talbyeh, Jordan (2008-11, Hafeda here employed as UN consultant). These demonstrated the potential for play and architectural intervention as tools for marginalised groups to contest ownership of space by transforming abandoned objects into play items, and were further developed in his practice-as-research after Hafeda joined LBU (2014). This research on collaboration and production was shared in the journal article ‘Bordering Practice: Negotiating Theory and Practice’ (2016); the monograph Negotiating Conflict in Lebanon: Bordering Practices in a Divided Beirut, (2019); and the co-authored publication ‘Creative Refuge’ (2014). (3.1; 3.2; 3.3) Hafeda’s research is recognised as an essential source for practitioners working with displaced and marginalised groups. Muna Budeiri, ICIP Deputy Director of The United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees HQ Amman, described ‘Creative Refuge’ as “ An enormous effort that expands our notions of what is possible in the restricted spatial and social context of a Palestine refugee camp. It is necessary work brimming with creativity of thought and expression.”

Hafeda’s social art commissions for SLG, SoP (2012-17) and Serpentine Galleries (3.4), applied these methods to projects with young people from Southwark and Westminster, building community cohesion and reclaiming public space. For the SLG commission, Hafeda and Charif remodelled a disused retail unit on Sceaux Gardens Estate into the SoP . Here, Hafeda’s principles of freedom and invention encouraged children and families to scavenge materials from the estate for free-play activities led by children, the adults facilitators rather than leaders. Febrik’s novel and rigorous exploration of the spatial dynamics of community groups was showcased in the exhibition ‘The Social Playground: Space of Protest’ at the Lebanese American University in Beirut, which assembled various models of play as a mechanism for protest, featuring projects in the Middle East and UK.(3.5)

In 2017 The Lebanese Association for Plastic Arts, Ashkal Alwan, commissioned Hafeda to produce ‘Sewing Borders’, (3.6) a film following Beirut residents as they undertake one of Hafeda’s projects, using sewing to annotate maps, prompting their consideration of Middle Eastern borders within an ongoing history of displacement. Typical of Hafeda’s works derived from participatory projects, the film extends the workshops into a visual language that resists the documentary approach.

3. References to the research

3.1 Hafeda, M. (2016) “Bordering Practice: Negotiating Theory and Practice”. In Architecture and Culture, vol. 4, no. 3. London: Taylor & Francis.

3.2 Hafeda, M (2019) Negotiating Conflict in Lebanon: Bordering Practices in a Divided Beirut. London: I.B. Tauris.

3.3 Hafeda, M., Charif, R. and Al Jabri, J. (2014) Creative Refuge. Washington DC: Tadween Publishing.

3.4 Hafeda, M. and Charif, R. (2016) Action of Street/Action of Room: A Directory of Public Actions. London: Serpentine Galleries.

3.5 Hafeda, M. and Charif, R. (2017) The Social Playground: Space of Protest, Exhibition at Lebanese American University. Beirut, Lebanon, March 2017.

3.6 Hafeda, M. (2017) Sewing Borders. The film was commissioned by Ashkal Alwan for Video Works 2017. Exhibitions include: Beirut Art Center part of Video Works (2017); a screening at the Mosaic Rooms, London (2017) where it was also the subject of a panel discussion between Laila Alodaat (Human Rights Lawyer), Dr. Camillo Boano (Architect), Michaela Crimmin (Curator) and Hafeda; Living Room UIT (Use It Together), ISCP New York (2019).

4. Details of the impact

Hafeda’s projects bestowed long-term benefits to diverse communities in London (2014-present), Portugal (2017-present), Brazil (2019-present) and Lebanon (2019-present), developing social and creative skills amongst 696 children, young people and adults, encouraging them to assert their rights and opinions about public space by building permanent social infrastructures. Hafeda’s work influenced decision-making of council authorities in London and Braga, Portugal; UK housing developers; South London Gallery and MK Gallery (UK); and curator Amanda Abi Khalil.

Informing estate planning and development in Southwark

The SoP galvanised SLG’s presence on Sceaux Gardens Estate. Originally temporary, SoP became permanent, with the Tenants and Residents Association insisting it was incorporated into Sceaux’s 2017 redevelopment. John McGrath explained: ‘ every time we have a meeting we always highlight the Shop of Possibilities because we don’t want it to go.’ The result was ‘Art Block’, a purpose-designed space based on SoP, with improved facilities for higher numbers of children and young people attracted by the provision. Dr Sim’s report observed: ‘ It is no small achievement (and a clear indicator of local endorsement) that the Shop of Possibilities has been incorporated into planned architectural developments on the estate.’(5.1) Hafeda was invited as guest of honour to launch Art Block in 2017.

Influencing surrounding communities

Sim’s observation that SoP’s ‘ influence stretches far beyond its immediate location’ echoes Jack James, SLG’s Children and Families Coordinator, who says it ‘ caused an expansion of the direct delivery the gallery was doing’. Instrumental in expanding off-site projects on 6 neighbouring estates (5.2), since 2016 the Freelands Foundation has supported SoP with £306,146 (5.3), the Art Block team playing ‘ a pivotal role in designing and defining the space’ at nearby Cezanne House in 2019.(5.1)

SoP was presented as best-practice for estate development in an independent report, shared with housing developers, London’s councils and the Greater London Authority, informing the investment of £873,299 for new programmes for the London Cultural Education Challenge (2015-18).(5.4) SoP also influenced MK Gallery’s Learning Team’s Learning Programme.(5.5)

Building confidence and skills in young people and children

Hafeda’s methods have had long-term benefits on participants’ confidence, wellbeing and social skills, as three independent reports, based on interviews with sessional workers, parents and children (5.1; 5.6), testify: “ The programme has benefited hundreds of children from vulnerable and disadvantaged backgrounds … supporting their social development and increasing confidence. It has also created training and paid employment opportunities for local young people between ages 16–25 … raising their ambitions and career goals whilst acting as positive role models for younger children.” (5.6). Hafeda’s work at Serpentine Galleries with struggling schoolchildren was a catalyst for improving confidence and creative skills. Alex Thorpe, Serpentine’s Education Curator, observed that Hafeda’s methods ‘ definitely [build] confidence. Confidence in articulating and sharing opinions and being confident to agree and disagree with people … giving them [the participants] some tools to think and reflect on their experiences.’(5.7)

New employment/training opportunities

SoP created employment for 20 sessional workers, 1 manager and 1 coordinator. Art Block employed 17 sessional workers, 1 manager, 1 coordinator and 3 trainees. According to James, estate residents ‘ gained employment, responsibility and income through this opportunity’ (5.2), many securing their first job since attending SoP as children. Dr Sim noted that SoP positively ‘ affected the aspirations and resilience’ of employees. (5.1)

Improving civic relations in Braga

When invited by Space Transcribers to mentor professionals on Santa Tecla housing estate in Braga, 2017, Hafeda used his innovative participatory methods to produce art events and a film, facilitating community discussions on social unity. Following Hafeda’s work with the Roma community, the community was ‘ incited… to take action over the future of their own social housing estate’, establishing ‘Gabinete de Mediação Roma’ in 2018, described by Fernando Ferreira, co-founder of Space Transcribers, as a ‘ resonance of Mohamad and [the] student’s project .. this mediation group continues to act as a bridge of communication and mediation between Santa Tecla’s residents and Braga’s City Council,’ moreover, ‘ This mediation process became essential for reducing the conflicts of communication transmitted during the entire regeneration process of the social housing estate.’(5.8)

Informing curatorial commissioning

Struck by Hafeda’s ‘ rare’ approach to socially engaged practice and his ability to give it a permanence through film, curator Amanda Abi Khalil selected ‘Sewing Borders’ for the exhibition ‘Living Room UIT (Use It Together)’ at ISCP, New York, 2019. The film changed how Khalil commissions social art: ‘ Mohamad’s video did influence and impact my practice as a curator, especially when it came to commissioning and the process of commissioning.’(5.9) Hafeda’s parlaying of social projects into further artworks was a key influence on Khalil’s commissioning for ‘A casa é sua’, at the Paço Imperial, Rio de Janeiro (2020): five social art projects Khalil commissioned, involving hundreds of children and adults from the Favela of Maré; an Arab community living in Rio de Janeiro; and refugees stranded between Lebanon and Syria.

5. Sources to corroborate the impact

5.1 External evaluation reports: Sim, N. (2015; 2019) Play Local evaluation report 2014-15 and SLG Open Plan External Evaluation. Reports supplied by South London Gallery.

5.2 Interview transcript and staffing numbers: James, J. (2020) Interview with Jack James, Children and Families Coordinator & Resident’s Programme Manager at South London Gallery. Interviewed by Z. Worth for Leeds Beckett University, 11 March.

5.3 Annual Reports: The Freelands Foundation Limited (2016, see pg.18-19; 2017, see pg.18; 2018 see pg.18) Annual Reports, [Online] Available at: https://freelandsfoundation.co.uk/about/annual-reports

5.4 Summary Report: A New Direction (2018 ) London Cultural Education Challenge Summary. [Online] Available at: https://www.anewdirection.org.uk/asset/3527

5.5 Research blog: MK Gallery (2015) ‘Behind the Scenes: Learning Team Research Visits’, MK Gallery Expansion, 12 November. Available at: https://mkgalleryexpansion.org/category/research/

5.6 Independent report: Bacon, N. & Bayram, C. (2016, see pgs. 50-51) The Cultural (Re)Generation: Building Creative Places for Young London. [Online] Available at: https://www.anewdirection.org.uk/asset/3226

5.7 Interview transcript: Thorpe, A. (2020) Interview with Alex Thorpe, Education Curator, Serpentine Galleries. Interviewed by Z. Worth for Leeds Beckett University, 16 March.

5.8 Testimonial: Ferreira, F. (2020) Testimonial from Fernando Ferreira, Co-Founder of Space Transcribers, 9 March.

5.9 Interview transcript: Khalil, A. (2020) Interview with Amanda Abi Khalil, Independent Curator. Interviewed by Z. Worth for Leeds Beckett University, 28 February.

Submitting institution
Leeds Beckett University
Unit of assessment
32 - Art and Design: History, Practice and Theory
Summary impact type
Cultural
Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
No

1. Summary of the impact

Gibbon’s research increased understanding among the public and arts professionals of how international arms trading is legitimised by cultural rituals such as music, hospitality, and etiquette. Her insights influenced a play about the arms industry, making significant material contributions to two campaigns that resulted in BAE Systems, Europe’s largest defence contractor, withdrawing sponsorship of the Great Exhibition of the North (GEON), and The National Festival of Making. Further acknowledged by artists Tatham and O’Sullivan in their installation at The Baltic, her research has raised international awareness of the ethics of corporate sponsorship of the arts.

2. Underpinning research

One of the world’s largest arms exporters, the UK sells weapons to countries listed as human rights abusers by the Foreign Office, enabling (for example) Bahrain’s violent suppression of pro-democracy protests, and Saudi Arabia’s airstrikes on Yemen. Through her practice-as-research methodologies, exhibitions, campaigns, and fieldwork at international arms fairs, Gibbon reveals how the arms trade, one of the world’s most secretive industries, is validated, normalised and justified. Consequently, Gibbon’s research has engendered a major expansion in the range of research into the international arms trade and how this information can be disseminated to the public.

Disguised as a security consultant, Gibbon visited 14 arms fairs in Europe and the Middle East from 2007-20. Once inside, she made drawings and collected complimentary gifts, capturing how arms deals are legitimised through polite rituals and corporate hospitality. She produced over 100 sketchbooks depicting the garb, gestures and manners used by the weapons industry to project a respectable image, revealing a culture otherwise hidden from public view: a string quartet playing Mozart in the shadow of a tank; a fashion show in front of a rack of missiles whilst hostesses serve champagne.(3.1) Among the thirty or so complimentary gifts collected from arms companies during fieldwork were stress-balls in the shape of bombs, grenades, and tanks; jellied sweet fighter jets; toffees in wrappers saying ‘welcome to hell’; and condoms with the slogan, ‘the ultimate protection’.(3.2)

This archive of sketchbooks and gifts provides new and novel insights into the disparity between the jaunty presentation of products at point-of-sale and their lethal purpose, showing how the cultural lingua franca of rituals like music, hospitality and etiquette are used to normalise the arms trade. Studies of the arms trade have predominantly been confined to the social sciences’ quantitative methods and rational analysis. However, etiquette isn’t easily quantifiable or rationalised; it’s aesthetic: performed, enacted, displayed.(3.3). Gibbon’s research applies practice-led fine art methodologies of drawing, performance and working with found objects to provide qualitatively derived insights into a secretive and problematic industry.

Beyond the fairs, arms companies’ sponsorship of cultural events distracts the public from their military role and monetising of death. Gibbon addressed this by co-founding the campaign group Art Not Arms (ANA) in 2018, petitioning against BAE Systems’ sponsorship of two arts festivals (GEON and The National Festival of Making), using campaigning as a critical art strategy allied with her visual artworks, similarly to artists such as Andrea Fraser, Hans Haacke and Micol Hebron. Both campaigns highlighted BAE System’s attempt to use arts sponsorship to detoxify its public image.

In 2018 Gibbon was awarded an Independent Social Research Foundation (ISRF) Early Career Fellowship, enabling her to disseminate her findings through an exhibition of sketchbooks, gifts, outfit, and photographs at the Bradford Peace Museum, one of the few museums in the world dedicated to peace and social reform, a unique venue for framing her research within a critical analysis of war. This research now comprises a book, and a book chapter. (3.1,3.2, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6).

3. References to the research

3.1 Gibbon, J. (2007-2020) Sketchbooks, [Pen and Ink]. Exhibitions include: Up in Arms Bethanien Gallery, Berlin (2019); And This Too, Platform Arts Gallery, Belfast (2017); Transcriptor: Illustration, Documentary and the Material, James Hockey Gallery, Farnham (2017); Visible Women, Leeds City Library (2016); Shock and Awe, Royal West Academy, Bristol (2014).

3.2 Gibbon, J. (2007-2020) Complimentary Gifts, [Collection of complimentary gifts from arms fairs]. Exhibitions include: Up in Arms, Bethanien Gallery, Berlin (2019); Kreig. Mach. Sinn, Ruhr Museum, Essen (2018 - 2019); And This Too, Platform Arts Gallery, Belfast (2017); Visible Women, Leeds City Library (2016); Shock and Awe, Royal West Academy, Bristol (2014).

3.3 Gibbon, J. and Sylvester, C. (2017) ‘Thinking Like an Artist-Researcher about War’ Millennium, Sage Publications, January 2017, 45 (2).

3.4 Gibbon, J. (2018) The Etiquette of the Arms Trade, Exhibition held at The Bradford Peace Museum, Bradford, 13th April - 28th June 2018.

3.5 Gibbon, J. (2018) The Etiquette of the Arms Trade, Nottingham: Beam Editions.

3.6 Gibbon, J. (2020) ‘This is Not a Bomb’, in Maltby, et al. (eds.) Spaces of War, Wars of Spaces, Bloomsbury, pp.187-204.

Grants

ISRF (2017-18) ISRF Early Career Fellowship Competition: £35,739.00

4. Details of the impact

Gibbon’s research highlights how weapons sales in the arms trade are normalised through cultural rituals and sponsorship of events. Her research informed a play on the arms trade and resulted in BAE Systems’ withdrawal as sponsor of two national cultural events.

Influencing public awareness of arms trade cultural sponsorship

Gibbon’s research enhances understanding of how weapons manufacturers appropriate cultural rituals to ‘artwash’ products. New insights from her exhibitions on arms fairs were shared with combined audiences of 2,114,442 (Source: Kantar), attracting international press coverage from Al Jazeera (2014), BBC Radio Four (2018), The Guardian (2014; 2018), Folket i Bilt (2019), Frieze (2019), and BBC World Service (2014, 2018), who introduced Gibbon as ‘ lifting the lid on the murky world of arms sales’. (5.1)

Exhibitions at Bradford Peace Museum (BPM) and Royal West Academy (2014) attracted high audience numbers.(5.2) Alison Bevan described the 8,046 visitors to Royal West Academy as the ‘ highest ever visitor numbers for the period’(5.3), resulting in an 8-month extension of the exhibition in an off-site gallery, attracting 899 visitors (5.2). The exhibition changed people’s understanding of the arms industry. For example, audiences ‘ did not know that the UK makes arms that are sold around the world and that are responsible for harming civilians’, and also thought that Gibbon’s ‘eye-opening exhibition unpicks the mystique of the arms trade’. (5.3)

Raising artists’ awareness of arms trade and reshaping arts production

Gibbon’s BPM exhibition was instrumental to the development of Common Wealth Theatre Company’s play I Have Met the Enemy, a scene depicting an arms fair was based on Gibbon’s drawings, which revealed a world previously inaccessible to the actors. Co-Director Evie Manning: ‘The exhibition's observations and depictions of the 'performance of respectability' has informed our play in such a way that we have built a significant opening scene around this idea and the characters, action and gestures that The Etiquette of the Arms Trade explored’. (5.4) Audiences of 980 people saw the play in Bradford and Newcastle. The play travelled to Cardiff (2019); and will tour Edinburgh and London in 2021 (delayed by COVID-19). Artists involved with GEON were previously unaware of the arms trade’s ‘art washing’ strategies. Artist Emily Hesse said that Gibbon’s work, ‘gives us an insight into something that we are not shown, this is a world which is hidden from us, and that’s how I really feel that her work was very beneficial to me at that time because it allowed me to see what was really going on behind the scenes in these arms fairs that I would have never otherwise seen.’ (5.5) Hesse documented this experience in an article for the book Black Birds Born from Invisible Stars (2018).

Influencing collective action

Gibbon’s research made a distinct and material contribution to the campaign that resulted in GEON dropping BAE Systems’ sponsorship in three ways. First, Gibbon co-founded ‘Art Not Arms’ and wrote the petition garnering 2,366 signatures and national press coverage. (5.6) Second, Gibbon’s drawings persuaded headliners the Commoners Choir to pull out of GEON, re-joining after BAE’s withdrawal. Choir leader Boff Whalley’s assertion that Gibbon’s work ‘alerted me to a side of the international trade in weapons that I hadn’t understood – that arms dealing is normalized with music, entertainment, and wine’, (5.7) is echoed by Hesse’s view that ‘the campaign did definitely make a lot of artists aware of it [the arms trade’s use of art washing]’. (5.5) Third, Gibbon’s research was used by artists Joanne Tatham and Tom O’Sullivan’s in their installation at BALTIC during GEON (seen by 166,851.(5.8)), which featured a history of anti-power stances, with Gibbon’s research an important reference. According to Tatham, the installation ‘included a description of Gibbon going undercover into arms fairs, her drawings revealing a world, which, with its string quartets and champagne seeks to create an impression that weapons are no different from any other object of exchange…[her] project provided both a resource for our own exhibition and demonstrated how the forms and approaches of contemporary art practice can enact political enquiry. (5.9).

Art Not Arms demonstrably influenced the cultural sector, highlighting arts organisations’ responsibility to check sponsors’ backgrounds. The BBC cited its impact on Turner Prize sponsorship, stating, ‘What has also become absolutely clear over the past 12 months is that arts organisations have to up their game when it comes to basic due diligence before accepting a sponsor’s money’ (5.10). Following Gibbon’s second Art Not Arms petition against BAE’s sponsorship of The National Festival of Making (23/04/2019), BAE was dropped after two days. (5.6)

An ARTnews article ‘The Year in Protest’ identified activism as a key influence on the art world, especially ‘protests and petitions that called attention to abuses of power, inequity, and privilege in the cultural sector’, citing Gibbon’s campaign as example of ‘[one of] the year’s notable art-world disruptions’. (5.10)

5. Sources to corroborate the impact

5.1 Interview Transcript: Gibbon, J. (2018) Interviewed by Celia Hatton with panel guests Giles Fraser and Milica Pesic for The BBC World Service, 28 April.

5.2 Exhibition Report: Bradford Peace Museum (2018-19) Exhibition Report for The Etiquette of the Arms Trade, the Bradford Peace Museum, Bradford.

5.3 Exhibition Report: Bottomley, S. & Cross, S. (2014) Exhibition Report for Shock and Awe: Contemporary Artists at War and Peace, Royal West of England Academy, Bristol.

5.4 Testimonial: Manning, E. (2019) Testimonial from Evie Manning, Co-Artistic Director of the Common Wealth Theatre Company, 1 March.

5.5 Interview transcript: Hesse, E. (2020) Interview with Emily Hesse, Independent Artist. Interviewed by Z. Worth for Leeds Beckett University, 27 July.

5.6 Art Not Arms Petitions: Art Not Arms (2018; 2019) Tell the Great Exhibition of the North to Refuse BAE sponsorship and Festival of Making: Drop BAE Sponsorship. Available at: https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/great-exhibition-of-the-north-to-refuse-bae-sponsorship and https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/festival-of-making-drop-bae-sponsorship-1 (Accessed: 18 March 2020).

5.7 Testimonial: Whalley, B. (2019) Testimonial from Boff Whalley, Leader of the Commoners Choir, 29 February.

5.8 Archive Information: Bouttell, S (2020) Correspondence and archive webpage from Sarah Bouttell, Producer (Documentation, Library & Archive) at Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art, 16 March.

5.9 Testimonial and Exhibition Newspaper Extract: Tatham, J. (2019) Testimonial from Joanne Tatham, Artist, 25 February; and O’Sullivan, T. & Tatham, J. (2018) Extract from A Successful Proposition for the Great North Exhibition: Broadsheet, 22 June 2018.

5.10 News Reports: Gompertz, W. (2019) ‘Turner Prize drops Stagecoach sponsorship over LGBT controversy’, BBC, 3 May. Available at: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-48142314 (Accessed: 18 March 2020). Selvin, C. (2018) ‘The Year in Protest: from the Met to Chapel Hill to Kochi and Beyond,’ Art News, 21 December. Available at: https://www.artnews.com/art-news/news/year-protest-met-chapel-hill-kochi-beyond-11583/ (Accessed: 18 March 2020).

Showing impact case studies 1 to 3 of 3

Filter by higher education institution

UK regions
Select one or more of the following higher education institutions and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No higher education institutions found.
Institutions

Filter by unit of assessment

Main panels
Select one or more of the following units of assessment and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No unit of assessments found.
Units of assessment

Filter by continued case study

Select one or more of the following states and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.

Filter by summary impact type

Select one or more of the following summary impact types and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.

Filter by impact UK location

UK Countries
Select one or more of the following UK locations and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No UK locations found.
Impact UK locations

Filter by impact global location

Continents
Select one or more of the following global locations and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No global locations found.
Impact global locations

Filter by underpinning research subject

Subject areas
Select one or more of the following underpinning research subjects and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No subjects found.
Underpinning research subjects