Impact case study database
- Submitting institution
- The University of Sheffield
- Unit of assessment
- 21 - Sociology
- Summary impact type
- Societal
- Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
- No
1. Summary of the impact
Research into post-mortem practice after infant loss has filled a critical gap in training for health professionals on post-mortem consent and bereavement support and led to changes in the support services and clinical practices in three NHS trusts. It has empowered local and national charities to lead changes in creative bereavement support practices, thus fostering the development of support communities across the UK and creating a voice for bereaved parents. Extensive media coverage has also raised public awareness around the taboo subject of baby loss, and in 2019 it was awarded the ESRC Outstanding Societal Impact prize due to the substantial impact achieved.
2. Underpinning research
Rationale: The National Health Service (NHS) estimates that one in eight UK pregnancies will end in miscarriage. Furthermore, approximately 5,544 babies were recorded as stillborn or died within the neonatal period in the UK in 2016 (ONS 2018). Post-mortem can play a critical role in establishing cause of death in such cases. But, in evidence submitted to a parliamentary debate on baby loss in 2016, low consent rates for post-mortem were identified as a continued source of concern, an obstacle to the advancement of scientific knowledge, clinical governance and medical education. Our research addressed this gap, uncovering barriers to consent and exploring the pioneering development of Minimally Invasive post-mortem using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). By offering an in-depth sociological understanding of the role of MRI in post-mortem this research has led to changes in clinical practice, and informed the development of better support mechanisms for bereaved parents both locally and nationally.
Research: This impact case study draws on the research findings from two projects: a pilot project funded by the British Academy 2012-13 on fetal MRI and an ESRC responsive mode project focusing on Minimally Invasive Autopsy 2015-18. Both projects have been supported by three Postdoctoral RAs in sociology. The research was based on a pioneering use of go-along ethnography, conducting mobile observations and in-depth interviews with different types of professionals – from pathologists through to hospital chaplains, coroners and the police (R1). It also included interviews with bereaved parents and other family members.
Findings: The research established the key factors behind low consent rates and how these may be addressed, thus offering a significant contribution to knowledge in this field. The findings emphasized various critical issues for key beneficiary groups: bereaved parents, health professionals and members of the public.
Professionals found it hard to ask parents for post-mortem consent. While parents often felt discouraged from consenting, they also expressed feelings of regret about not opting for post-mortem. The need for better professional training, and opening training to a wider pool of professionals was therefore highlighted by the research.
Parents felt overwhelmed by information they received after their baby had died. They also articulated concerns over who would care for their baby during post-mortem (R2). This highlighted the need to change the content, type and timing of information given to parents.
While MRI post-mortem was not available to all parents in the study, most would like this to become more accessible in the future (R3, R4). Professionals endorsed this view, identifying this as an area in need of further development in NHS trusts across the UK.
The research concluded that professional practices around consent could be improved; access to MRI provision needs to be widened and the nature and value of hidden care practices made visible to parents considering post-mortem. These issues were central to Remembering Baby (R5), our collaborative art exhibition which toured the UK in 2017-18 and which led to significant impact.
3. References to the research
Reed, K., & Ellis, J. (2018). Movement, Materiality, and the Mortuary: Adopting Go-Along Ethnography in Research on Fetal and Neonatal Postmortem. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 48(2), 209–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241618769997
Reed, K., & Ellis, J. (2020). Uncovering Hidden Emotional Work: Professional Practice in Paediatric Post-Mortem. Sociology, 54(2), 312–328. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038519868638
Reed, K., Kochetkova, I., & Whitby, E. (2016). Visualising uncertainty: Examining women’s views on the role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in late pregnancy. Social Science & Medicine, 164, 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.07.012
Reed, K., Kochetkova, I., & Molyneux-Hodgson, S. (2016). ‘You’re looking for different parts in a jigsaw’: foetal MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) as an emerging technology in professional practice. Sociology of Health & Illness, 38(5), 736–752. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12398
Reed, K., Whitby, E., & Ellis, J. (2018). Remembering Baby. Bereavement Care, 37(3), 88–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/02682621.2018.1539299
4. Details of the impact
This research has provided parents with an important source of support and enhanced both professional practice and service delivery. It has also facilitated a change in public attitudes towards post-mortem.
Empowering people and communities: The research team created a model for creative bereavement support workshops which are being rolled out nationally by bereavement support charities (8 conducted so far with over 1,000 participants) (e.g. Lullaby Trust, Wings of Love project S1, S2). Bereavement support charities (e.g. Teardrop, Northumbria) have used the research to raise awareness in “ communities that often feel sidelined” in the North East, and to lobby local NHS Trusts for change in service delivery (S3). Other charities have used the research to raise public awareness, encouraging bereaved parents to seek organised support (e.g. Zephyrs, Nottingham S4). Online parent support communities have emerged as a result of our project exhibition Remembering Baby (S5). Testimonials and letters of support show the sheer significance of this research impact on bereaved parents: “you have brought light and broken the taboo. I think the world should see your work! Please keep going and bring a voice for us and our beautiful babies” (S5).
Professional development: The research team created a film Matter of Fact, based on qualitative interview transcripts with professionals. This film, which featured in our exhibition, is used to train staff in NHS trusts across the UK (e.g. APTs, Northumbria; Neonatal Nurses, Yorkshire & Humber and East Midlands), and has also been implemented as a bereavement support tool by charities (S1, S3). The film has been translated into Spanish and featured in various international events on Stillbirth, SIDs and Perinatal Post-mortem (S6, S7). Professional testimonials demonstrate how the film provides essential professional training: “Highly useful tool for families and healthcare professionals” and parent accounts highlight its emotional impact “ The word “post-mortem” used to scare me, now it doesn’t, as now I know my baby was treated with love, care, dignity and respect. Thank you” (S7, S5). Our pioneering multi-professional approach has led to innovative consent training for midwives (S7), an approach that has been showcased at elite national medical events such as the Royal College of Radiology annual conference. The research team have also created CPD opportunities for neglected professionals such as paramedics, fostering essential connections between hospital-based care and emergency services (S7).
Changing practice and service delivery: The research has had a direct impact on practice across Sheffield Teaching Hospitals (STH) and Sheffield Children’s Hospital (SCH). STH have developed a creative bereavement support group based on our original Festival of Social Science workshop Lasting Impressions which has significantly enhanced parent support mechanisms (S8). Information materials given to parents about post-mortem have been re-written to include professional care practices (S6, S9, S8). Midwives routinely use our Remembering Baby quilt during their family visits because “ it visually displays to parents that they are not alone and are not the only ones who have experienced loss” (S8). All parents across STH can now create a fabric square for a memorial quilt (S8). The research has fostered new dialogue across different NHS Trusts, leading to changes in clinical practice in hospitals beyond Sheffield. For example, Northumbria NHS Foundation trust are piloting the feasibility of a Minimally Invasive Post-mortem service (S3). Without this research professionals within and across NHS Trusts would continue to work in silos and bereaved parents wouldn’t receive the care currently being established (S1, S3, S6, S7 & S9).
Raising national public awareness and challenging taboos: The exhibition and project have received sustained media coverage, with reviews stating that this is “ pioneering work in breaking down the conversational silence” leading to a change in public attitudes to baby loss and post-mortem. There have been, to-date, over 20 media reviews and reports including: BBC main news site, BBC Radio 4 PM programme, BBC Radio Sheffield (2018 & 2019), BBC Radio Nottingham (2018), Sheffield Live, SANDS: Stillbirth and Neonatal Death Charity (2017 and 2018), and Yorkshire Post (S10). Furthermore, around 2000 people visited the Remembering Baby exhibition during 2017-18. 250 formal FSS ESRC evaluation forms, 213 visitor book entries, around 300 social media responses, 50 emails, 15 written testimonials, and two invited impact publications (e.g. CRUSE affiliated Journal of Bereavement Care) all capture the extent of this impact (S1, S5, S7, S10, R5).
As a result of the extent & quality of the impact that this research has achieved, Reed and her team were awarded the ESRC Outstanding Societal Impact Prize in July 2019 (S1).
5. Sources to corroborate the impact
The ESRC created a case study and film about the research impact changing practices and supporting parents for infant post-mortems (ESRC Outstanding Societal Impact Prize 2019). The film highlights the key research impacts and includes testimonials from one parent and from the National Charity for Sudden Infant Death, The Lullaby Trust.
Wings of Love, film and website. This demonstrates how our model of creative workshops has been adopted on a national basis by the Lullaby Trust.
Coordinator of Teardrop Support Group (affiliated with the National Stillbirth and Neonatal Death Charity SANDs and Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust). This letter of support demonstrates how impact has been achieved beyond the immediate geographical context of the research, shedding light on baby loss in neglected parts of the UK. It also shows how the research enabled different charities and NHS Foundation trusts to engage in shared dialogue about post-mortem, and facilitated change in NHS service around Minimally Invasive Autopsy.
Project manager Zephyr’s (Nottingham Hospital Charity's Bereavement Support Centre). This letter establishes how one Nottingham based charity used the Remembering Baby exhibition to open up a dialogue about baby-loss and encourage bereaved parents to seek formal support.
Parent testimonials and blogs: These testimonials were collected by members of the research team either at, or after, various events (e.g. the creative workshops and exhibition). Blogs and social media posts were also captured by the research team through the Remembering Baby Twitter and Instagram account. These demonstrate the deep and profound impact of the research and exhibition on parent experience both locally and nationally. They also illustrate the ways in which new baby loss communities were created as a result of the research.
Head of Histopathology (Sheffield Children’s Hospital Foundation Trust). This letter provides evidence of how the film Matter of Fact is being used to train health professionals. It also details the positive effects of the exhibition on bereaved parents and members of the public. It also shows how the research is leading to change in service delivery.
Professional written testimonials: These testimonials were collected by members of the research team either at, or after, various events (e.g. the creative workshops, exhibition and professional training events). They detail the impact of the exhibition and Matter of Fact film on professional development and training, locally nationally and internationally. Professional statements also show the impact of the research on different types of clinical practice, as well as on academic practice.
Psychological well-being Midwife (Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust). This letter demonstrates the impact of the Remembering Baby quilt on bereavement support practices. It also shows how our original ESRC FSS creative bereavement support group Lasting Impressions is being embedded within the NHS.
Bereavement Services Coordinator, Bereavement Services (Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust). This letter details the impact of the exhibition on bereaved parents, professionals and members of the public. It also shows how the research is leading to change in consent practices at STH.
Media coverage portfolio (includes synopsis of news features and statistics until end of 2017). This demonstrates the significant national impact of the research and exhibition on the opinions of the national public.
- Submitting institution
- The University of Sheffield
- Unit of assessment
- 21 - Sociology
- Summary impact type
- Societal
- Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
- No
1. Summary of the impact
Though repeatedly acknowledged as a public health issue, local and national policymakers have struggled to respond to the increased genetic risk associated with close relative (consanguineous) marriage among some UK ethnic minority populations. Salway’s research has impacted on health policy, practice, and investment across the UK. Salway’s innovative and influential programme of research including her four-stranded service model, has reframed and increased understanding amongst professionals, building their confidence to act. Salway’s research has challenged and reframed understanding amongst policymakers and public health practitioners, leading to changes in practice at the national, regional, and local levels across the UK. The research has improved community understanding of the impacts of consanguineous marriage, with more than 1,000 individuals in Sheffield alone benefiting from face-to-face conversations with public health officials. Online materials based on Salway’s research reached 4,594 users with learning resources being adapted for the NHS e-Learning for Health.
2. Underpinning research
Close relative (consanguineous) marriage can result in increased risk of genetic morbidity, particularly recessive conditions including severe metabolic and neurological disorders. Despite being recognised as a public health issue that has significant impact on families and services, local and national policymakers have struggled to respond to the issue. Salway’s innovative and influential programme of sociologically-informed research has improved understanding of the social and political factors that shape risk patterns, service access and experiences, and policy responses. The co-designed research with practitioners, policymakers, community organisations, and local people, has developed, evaluated, and supported the implementation of culturally appropriate and effective responses.
Research findings 1: unmet demand for genetic literacy and services
Between 2013 and 2016 Salway conducted a series of participatory research projects examining understanding and experiences among community members affected by this health issue. Findings demonstrated an appetite for better knowledge; low awareness of services; poor understanding of risk; previously inaccurate messages from healthcare professionals; suspicion of motives behind interventions; importance of lay, as well as professional, sources of information; and the dominance of word-of-mouth messaging as the preferred method of communication. Findings showed that local people wanted to co-design genetic literacy approaches, and that materials should include narrative, visual methods; non-stigmatising content; facts and figures from credible sources; acknowledgement of moral and religious concerns; and encouragement to access genetic services (unfamiliar and frightening to many). Evaluation findings confirmed public acceptability of developed materials and the importance of opportunities for face-to-face discussion to clarify complex information [R1, R2].
Research findings 2: partial professional understandings and patchy local responses
Salway's formative evaluation examined local services and professional understandings of consanguineous marriage and approaches to address genetic risk around England. Findings showed variable responses, mixed success, and some alienation of affected communities. The predominant focus from public health services was on educating community members. Services did not include more holistic approaches that aimed to also equip healthcare professionals and increase access to genetic services for affected families. Unrealistic policy expectations of short-term reductions in infant mortality, and problematic ‘invest to save’ justifications for service developments were highlighted. These resulted in activity not being sustained. Inadequate local approaches reflected the wider commissioning system that struggles to accommodate diverse needs and questions ethnic minority healthcare entitlement. The research provided important insights into inappropriate policy and practice approaches, obstacles to progress, as well as positive elements to be replicated [R3, R4].
Research findings 3: opportunity to develop a national policy framework
In 2018, Salway conducted a study with healthcare professionals and the public to explore their views on how to respond to this health need. She employed the Delphi method to build consensus in expert opinion in an iterative and structured way over three rounds. Following this consensus conference discussions resulted in a final set of 148 agreed statements, providing direction for both policymakers and healthcare professionals. These included principles of approach and specific expectations for services. The study produced important new insights into how a national response could be crafted. It highlighted the importance of responding to health needs that disproportionately affect ethnic minority groups without racialisation. Findings helped to frame the issue as a problem of fundamental inequitable access to healthcare. From this Salway developed a ‘four-stranded’ service model incorporating the four priorities: enhancements to clinical genetic services; training for healthcare professionals; increasing genetic literacy within communities; and equitable access to genetic technologies [R5, R6].
3. References to the research
University of Sheffield researchers in bold
Ali, P. A., Salway, S., Such, E., Dearden, A., & Willox, M. (2018). Enhancing health literacy through co-design: development of culturally appropriate materials on genetic risk and customary consanguineous marriage. Primary Health Care Research & Development, 20, e2. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1463423618000038
Salway, S., Ali, P., & Ahmed, S. (2014). Towards enhanced community genetic literacy among a minority ethnic community: a participatory action research project. The Lancet, 384, S7. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(14)62133-4
Salway, S., Ali, P., Ratcliffe, G., Such, E., Khan, N., Kingston, H., & Quarrell, O. (2016). Responding to the increased genetic risk associated with customary consanguineous marriage among minority ethnic populations: lessons from local innovations in England. Journal of Community Genetics, 7(3), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-016-0269-1
Salway, S., Mir, G., Turner, D., Ellison, G. T. H., Carter, L., & Gerrish, K. (2016). Obstacles to “race equality” in the English National Health Service: Insights from the healthcare commissioning arena. Social Science & Medicine, 152, 102–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.01.031
Salway, S., Yazici, E., Khan, N., Ali, P., Elmslie, F., Thompson, J., & Qureshi, N. (2019). How should health policy and practice respond to the increased genetic risk associated with close relative marriage? results of a UK Delphi consensus building exercise. BMJ Open, 9(7), e028928. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-028928
Salway, S. (2018). Working ‘with and against’ ethnic categories to understand and tackle health inequalities: illustrations from research and practice relating to infant mortality in England. European Journal of Public Health, 28(S1), cky047.036. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cky047.036
4. Details of the impact
Challenging and reframing understandings among practitioners and decision makers at national and local levels
Salway drew on research findings [R1- R4] in oral and written policy briefings to policymakers and healthcare professionals to effectively improve knowledge and reframe understanding away from a focus on marriage practices towards enhancing informed choice and service equity.
In 2018, Salway established a national Steering Group, with Public Health England, NHS England/Improvement (NHS/I), Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC), plus eight professional bodies. This was 'completely new and desperately needed' [GP with Special Interest (GPwSI) in Genetics and Primary Care Adviser, HEE Genomics Programme, S1]. Salway used the Steering Group to issue policy briefings to key professional networks (maternity, general practice, genomics). Salway was subsequently asked to present at the Maternity Transformation Programme (MTP) Inequalities Roundtable chaired by Chief Midwife, Jacqueline Dunkley-Bent in November 2019. Salway’s research is credited with “ challenging earlier approaches” [Principal Genetic Counsellor, S1] and generating new understanding of need and appropriate action [GPwSI in Genetics and Primary Care Adviser, HEE Genomics Programme, S1].
Learning events across England (September 2013-2020) drew on Salway's research findings [R3, R4] to inform course content. Over 470 healthcare professionals representing, amongst others, public health, midwifery, clinical genetics, and health visiting attended these events, which were held in every 'high need' area in England [Learning event feedback, S2]. Event evaluations demonstrate impact on knowledge and awareness. Events were “thought provoking, helping to shift attitudes around the issue and the role of professionals in addressing unmet need” [Director of Public Health, Rotherham, S3] and delivered important learning [S2]. Online materials were promoted reaching 4,594 users and learning resources are being adapted for the NHS e-Learning for Health “attesting to their recognised importance and quality” [GPwSI in Genetics and Primary Care Adviser, HEE Genomics Programme, S1].
Locally, Salway established and chaired the Sheffield multi-agency community genetics group 2013-2016 and remains a member, enabling sustained research-informed dialogue. The research “helped to significantly raise awareness and shift understanding of the issue among key professional stakeholders” [Director of Public Health, Sheffield, S3]. In 2019, Salway gave “invaluable” guidance to a BBC Newsnight feature shaping the first mainstream media coverage to highlight “the important issue of improving access to genetic services” [Producer, S4]. In Birmingham, this coverage created “ a more receptive atmosphere” amongst local politicians [Interim Assistant Director of Public Health, S4], prompting a presentation to the council’s Health Overview and Scrutiny Committee. Salway has briefed public health officials working in communities with England’s highest rates of consanguinity: Rotherham, Leicester, Bradford, West Midlands, and several London boroughs.
Directly influencing new policy, practice, and investment
In 2019, the national Steering Group was formally incorporated into the MTP Reducing Inequalities work plan. In 2020, Salway’s findings [R5, R6] “directly shaped the development of the first national policy proposal in this area” [Consultant Geneticist, S5]. Salway worked with clinical stakeholders to make a case for government funding. Her work was used to design a proposed new model to incorporate national, regional, and place-based solutions. “This represents a significant new national policy development since all prior action has been locally led and often not sustained” [Consultant Geneticist, S5]. The submitted proposal includes multi-million-pound investment which would flow to eight areas of highest need and includes newly developed specialist posts. This constitutes a significant policy innovation. “ Reducing genetic risk amongst ‘at risk’ populations is necessary to help achieve the ‘halve it’ aim and to reduce health inequalities […] Therefore, the work of Professor Salway and others aligns closely to the MTP’s strategic aims. The work is valuable because it identifies not only the issues but also clear, practical, evidence-based solutions […] The quality of the research enabled us to gain support for the proposal from senior colleagues, both internally and externally” [Programme Manager MTP, S6].
Salway’s research has been instrumental in informing the development of the Clinical Genomics Service specification through the incorporation of explicit attention to unmet ethnic minority needs . Without Salway’s work the Principal Genetic Counsellor, Manchester, states “the progress that has been made at local and national level…would not have been possible” [S1]. Salway was an invited expert in the West Yorkshire and Harrogate Local Maternity System Prevention Workstream (2020). Her Delphi research [R5] directly informed the development of the expert group recommendations and is now shaping action to enhance service access and increased genetic literacy at the community level. “The recommendations are now guiding local action, particularly in Bradford and Kirklees, two areas with high numbers of families at risk and in need of enhanced services. Further, Sarah has supported both these areas via the adaptation of evidence-based genetic literacy materials” [Programme Manager for Improving Population Health & Public Health Lead for Maternity, S7].
At a local level Salway’s research [R1-R4] directly shaped Sheffield’s new response to the issue. This included the creation of a novel Community Genetics Outreach Worker post and use of co-produced genetic literacy materials at community and health professional levels [Community Outreach Worker, S8; Director of Public Health Sheffield, S3].
Seven of the Local Authorities with the highest need have adopted the genetic literacy materials to support genetic literacy strategies [Programme Manager for Improving Population Health & Public Health Lead for Maternity, S7; S9].
Enhanced information and service access
Enhancing informed choice among even small numbers of individuals has huge benefits at family and health service level due to the high social, emotional, and financial costs associated with severe conditions. Families raising a disabled child face extreme economic pressure; it is estimated that it is three times more expensive to raise a child with disabilities than without. The emotional and social impact of unanticipated affected births can also be significant for parents and wider families. Therefore, access to accurate, sensitive, and trusted sources of information is essential. Salway’s research has impacted over 1,000 people in Sheffield via face-to-face conversations amongst practitioners and community members and through the 5,000 distributed genetic literacy leaflets [Director of Public Health Sheffield, S3]. The genetic literacy materials have been “ extremely important in engaging community members and helping them to understand the patterns of risk and gain confidence to discuss the issue” [Community Outreach Worker, S8]. Case studies developed by Sheffield City Council, documenting their outreach work, demonstrated that families were better informed and better supported to access genetic services [Director of Public Health Sheffield, S3].
Additionally, health and social care costs can be very high due to multiple hospital appointments, repeated hospital stays, care from multiple specialities and community teams, medication, home adaptations, and treatment. For a child with severe learning disabilities alone, the average care package cost per annum is estimated at £70k. Thus, a clear pathway of support and collaborative working amongst health and social care services is vital. Salway’s research played a crucial role in developing more joined-up working [Programme Manager MTP, S6] and creating and sustaining this work [Director of Public Health, S3; Community Outreach Worker, S8].
5. Sources to corroborate the impact
Testimonial Evidence from senior genetic service professionals.
Learning event feedback September 2013-October 2020.
Testimonials from local directors of public health.
Impact stemming from Newsnight feature including testimonial from the interim Assistant Director of Public Health, Birmingham.
Testimonial from consultant geneticist and ex-chair of the National Clinical Reference Group for Clinical Genetics.
Evidence related to the development of national proposal for new service investments including testimonial from the Maternity Transformation Programme Manager.
West Yorkshire and Harrogate Local Maternity System Public Health Recommendations July 2020 (Salway’s research referred to on p.25) and testimonial from programme manager.
Testimonials from patient and community perspectives.
Evidence showing the genetic material leaflets used by seven local authorities.
- Submitting institution
- The University of Sheffield
- Unit of assessment
- 21 - Sociology
- Summary impact type
- Societal
- Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
- No
1. Summary of the impact
This UK study revealed profound and previously undocumented links between children’s chances of entering public care and protection systems and their socioeconomic circumstances. These findings have directly influenced policy and practice discourses and driven changes in the development of responses to children in need of care and protection. The research stream led by Sheffield focused on practice and has been instrumental in changing national policy, the training of social workers, and the development of new services and practices in agencies and local authorities. In doing so it has placed recognition of the impact of socioeconomic circumstances at the heart of debates about child welfare interventions.
2. Underpinning research
Rationale: Unequal rates in outcomes in health and education are routinely understood as a product of socioeconomic circumstances. However, this same inequalities lens has not been applied to the rates of children entering care or in need of protection, despite these interventions being life changing for children. This research was the first UK study of its kind. Our findings identified previously unacknowledged inequalities in care and protection interventions, across the UK nations. By evidencing: (i) a significant relationship between socioeconomic circumstances and child welfare interventions; (ii) detailing variations across and within the UK nations, and (iii) offering new in-depth understandings of social work responses to family socioeconomic circumstances, this research led to substantial changes in policy and practice.
Research: The empirical base for this case study is the Nuffield funded Child Welfare Inequalities Project (CWIP). This interdisciplinary study involved seven UK universities and received over £600,000 in funding. Morris, Mason, and Webb (Sheffield) led the mixed methods case studies work stream and actively contributed to the other two work streams. Morris was part of the senior leadership team. The research involved:
An international evidence review of the relationship between child abuse, poverty and neglect ( R1) (led by the University of Huddersfield).
A quantitative work stream: linking Indicators of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) with rates of care and protection (led by the University of Huddersfield).
A mixed method work stream: six comparative case studies in England, Northern Ireland, and Scotland, examining unequal child welfare intervention rates through the lens of social work practice (led by the University of Sheffield).
Findings: Our research revealed that: (i) children in the most deprived parts of the UK are over 12 times more likely to be the subject of state intervention, compared with those in the least deprived parts; (ii) deprivation was the most significant driver of these unequal rates; (iii) social workers paid little attention to family’s socio-economic circumstances in their planning and decision-making.
The Sheffield contribution was essential in establishing that variations in professional practice could **not explain the unequal intervention rates observed in the linked data. This allowed robust validation of the quantitative finding of the link between wider socio-economic factors and care and protection interventions ( R2). Extending this analysis by exploring supply and demand, Webb’s and Bywaters revealed that the most deprived LAs had experienced the greatest reductions in children’s services funding ( R3).
Unequal intervention rates between the four nations were also revealed by the research. Northern Ireland (NI) for example, is the most deprived UK nation whilst ranking lowest in terms of intervention rates. Sheffield led case studies explored this counterintuitive finding and identified key factors influencing NI intervention rates ( R4). This produced further evidence of the complexity of the relationship between intervention rates and socioeconomic factors.
Alongside generating advances in mixed methods research ( R5) this research is underpinned by highly cited academic outputs that offer critical conceptual and theoretical developments ( R6). Overall, the CWIP evidenced for the first time that the chances of growing up in one’s birth family are significantly reduced by poverty, raising substantial moral and political questions for child welfare systems, policies, and practices.
3. References to the research
Bywaters, P., Bunting, L., Davidson, G., Hanratty, J., Mason, W., McCartan, C. and Steils, N. (2016). The relationship between poverty, child abuse and neglect: an evidence review. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation. Available at: https://www.jrf.org.uk/report/relationship-between-poverty-child-abuse-and-neglect-evidence-review.
Morris, K., Mason, W., Bywaters, P., Featherstone, B., Daniel, B., Brady, G., Bunting, L., Hooper, J., Mirza, N., Scourfield, J., & Webb, C. (2018). Social work, poverty, and child welfare interventions. Child & Family Social Work, 23(3), 364–372. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12423
Webb, C. J. R., & Bywaters, P. (2018). Austerity, rationing and inequity: trends in children’s and young peoples’ services expenditure in England between 2010 and 2015. Local Government Studies, 44(3), 391–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2018.1430028
Mason, W., Morris, K., Featherstone, B., Bunting, L., Davidson, G., McCartan, C., Bywaters, P., & Webb, C. (2020). Understanding out of Home Care Rates in Northern Ireland: A Thematic Analysis of Mixed Methods Case Studies. The British Journal of Social Work. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcaa075
Mason, W., Morris, K., Webb, C., Daniels, B., Featherstone, B., Bywaters, P., Mirza, N., Hooper, J., Brady, G., Bunting, L., & Scourfield, J. (2019). Toward Full Integration of Quantitative and Qualitative Methods in Case Study Research: Insights From Investigating Child Welfare Inequalities. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14(2), 164–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689819857972
Featherstone, B., Gupta, A., Morris, K. and White, S. (2018). Protecting Children: A Social Model. Bristol: Policy Press. https://policy.bristoluniversitypress.co.uk/protecting-children
4. Details of the impact
Given the contemporary social and political context it is extremely difficult to gain traction with findings that challenge entrenched priorities. As such, our strategy was: (i) to reframe the policy debate, by introducing child welfare as a matter of inequality; and (ii) to influence social work practice at national and local authority (LA) levels.
Changing understanding
Our media and public engagement strategy allowed extensive research dissemination and reach. The research attracted widespread media coverage, featuring on BBC prime time news and webpages, Radio Four, the Guardian and relevant professional publications (S1).
In Parliament, the research team presented evidence to the 2016/17 APPG Select Committee on Children. Morris’ evidence was quoted in their report, setting out the recommendations for policy changes (S2). Questions directly drawing on CWIP have been asked by MPs in the House of Commons (S3) and, for the first time, Ofsted (2017) included deprivation as a consideration in their assessment of Children’s Services (S4). These examples demonstrate a fundamental shift in understandings of the link between poverty and children’s services that are directly attributable to CWIP.
The national Care Crisis Review, coordinated by Family Rights Group, was established in 2017 in response to growing concern about the rising number of children in the care system. Findings from CWIP were heavily drawn on in the analysis of drivers for intervention rates and in the development of Inquiry outputs (S5), with Morris appointed to the Steering Group as an Advisor.
Internationally the research has also resulted in the formation of a child welfare anti-poverty network.
Policy change
Our impact strategy has placed child welfare inequality on national policy agendas across the UK. This policy shift is embodied through: (i) the positioning of child welfare inequalities in policy recommendations and statements; and (ii) the commissioning of related guidance and research by national UK governments.
Morris, alongside CWIP partners presented evidence to the Association of Directors of Children’s Services (2017/ 2018), significantly influencing their national policy statements and informing their analysis of the issues and changes required in child protection and care (S6).
In Northern Ireland, the Department of Health commissioned and produced a national Anti-Poverty Practice Framework for social work (S7) that brings poverty into the foreground of social work practice, responding directly to the CWIP case study findings.
In Scotland the Neglect Strategy has been amended in light of the CWIP findings, specifically the need to move away from holding parents responsible for material and environmental conditions (S8).
UK practice & service change
National organisations
The team has worked closely with the British Association of Social Workers (BASW) to support changes in social work policy and practice. BASW produced a podcast on CWIP, shared with their 20,000 membership. This has accompanied the joint production of practice guidance for BASW members (Sept 2019, S9) that draws directly from the case studies to encourage practice considerations of family socio-economic circumstances in case planning.
A CWIP app (CWIP App www.cwip-app.co.uk) was developed by Webb (Sheffield), enabling social workers to visualise and understand how LA data relate to core CWIP findings. The app was actively promoted by BASW. Adoption of the CWIP App has been high, being used by every local authority in England. Over 500 hours of active use have been logged (by 28-Sep-2020). This work was cited in evidence given to the Comprehensive Spending Review by Children England (S6).
The national DfE funded the ‘practice supervisors’ programme (which works with over 100 local authorities and national children’s services partners) commissioned a resource to address issues of poverty and deprivation, drawing directly on the case study findings. This resource forms part of an open access repository of practice resources (S9), used by over 200 social work supervisors in routine practice supervision across England.
Local authorities
The CWIP team led over 50 practice-focused sessions in LAs, with staff reporting routine practice changes to ‘poverty proof’ their approaches. The research has been extensively used in training social workers, and their practice managers (S10).
Morris and Featherstone led five workshops for local managers across England, including over 100 staff. As a result, Morris and Featherstone have worked directly with multiple LAs, changing policy and practice by training frontline managers and staff. For example, in Barnsley Morris and Featherstone have worked alongside senior managers and frontline staff to revise their neglect strategy and to poverty proof their practices (S10). This includes assessing socio economic conditions explicitly, the formation of a LA wide Poverty Task and Finish Group to drive forward practices that address the consequences of poverty.
Further studies
In Wales a national study has been commissioned (2018) by the government to replicate the English, Scottish and NI case studies, with Mason and Morris as advisors.
Internationally the research has resulted in comparable work in New Zealand and Norway.
5. Sources to corroborate the impact
Bundle of media clippings where CWIP has been reported.
Storing Up Trouble: A postcode lottery of children’s social care (p.32).
Correspondence with Emeritus Professor of Social Work, UEA), supported with excerpt from Hansard transcript.
The Annual Report of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills 2016/1 (p.70).
Testimony from Chief Executive, Family Rights Group.
ACDS Fair funding review: a review of relative needs and resources (p.3) plus a letter of support from ACDS President and evidence to the CSR from Children England.
Anti-Poverty Practice Framework for Social Work in Northern Ireland (CWIP cited from the outset) plus a supporting testimony from Chief Social Worker for Northern Ireland.
Email correspondence with Child Protection Lead Officer, East Lothian Council and Chair, Scottish Safeguarding Children Boards.
Director, Research in Practice testimony supported with email correspondence with Head of Policy and Research, British Association of Social Workers.
Testimony from Assistant Chief Officer, Children’s Services and North East Operations combined with mail correspondence with Head of Service, Children and Family Social Care, Barnsley Council; Senior Manager, Children’s Social Care East, Lancashire County Council; and the Barnsley Report.
- Submitting institution
- The University of Sheffield
- Unit of assessment
- 21 - Sociology
- Summary impact type
- Societal
- Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
- No
1. Summary of the impact
Through policy interventions at globally popular social media companies, Dr. Ysabel Gerrard’s research has made platforms safer for people with eating disorders. Social media companies have been heavily criticised for lax regulation of posts about eating disorders, but Gerrard’s research has directly led Instagram and Tumblr to improve their policies and better protect vulnerable users. This research has transformed how potentially harmful posts are advertised on social media and changed the rules on what people are allowed to do and say. Extensive international media coverage of the findings has raised public awareness of eating disorders, encouraging people to seek help and, ultimately, save lives.
2. Underpinning research
Rationale: Eating disorders are on the rise in the UK and internationally, particularly among young women. According to Beat, the UK’s eating disorder charity, anorexia is the psychiatric condition with the highest mortality rate ( R1). Before Gerrard’s research-led interventions, social media platforms were plagued with content posted by users to promote the worsening of eating disorders like anorexia: so-called ‘pro-ana’ posts. Social media companies write their own policies and remove content that breaks the rules, via content moderation. But their policy teams previously lacked the expertise to understand what happens in eating disorder communities and how they should decide which posts to remove. This resulted in years of public criticism of inaction. Gerrard’s research addressed this issue, filling gaps in policymakers’ knowledge about how, exactly, people break social media companies’ rules to enact harmful behaviours. Following extensive media coverage of Gerrard’s research, Instagram and Tumblr approached her to lead transformative changes to their content policies.
Research: This impact case study draws on findings from three publications ( R1, R2, R3). The underpinning research was conducted during Gerrard’s first year at the University of Sheffield, using digital methods such as covert online observations.
Findings: Gerrard’s research filled three main gaps in knowledge:
Hashtag moderation: Social media users often use hashtags (e.g. #proana) to expose their posts to people beyond their ‘friend’ networks. Gerrard revealed that Instagram and Tumblr failed to restrict access to all hashtags that promoted eating disorders, exposing vulnerable users to distressing content ( R3). This finding highlighted the need for Instagram and Tumblr to restrict users’ access to more potentially harmful hashtags.
Username moderation: Social media users generally choose a username, and while some people use their real name, others apply pseudonyms. Gerrard’s research discovered that Instagram and Tumblr did not restrict access to searches for usernames containing terms that promote eating disorders ( R3). This finding highlighted the need to develop new content moderation techniques that prevent users from choosing usernames that could be harmful.
Recommendation systems: Social media platforms often show new content to users by collecting data on their browsing habits and using this to show them other things they might be interested in. However, Gerrard’s research revealed that Instagram and Tumblr recommend troubling content that promotes eating disorders, including for ‘miracle’ diet products ( R1, R3, R4).
Gerrard also published her findings in a WIRED magazine article ( R1), in order to share the findings with technology industry workers from a broader range of companies.
3. References to the research
Gerrard, Y. and Gillespie, T. (2019, 21st February). When algorithms think you want to die. WIRED. Available at: https://www.wired.com/story/when-algorithms-think-you-want-to-die/.
McCosker, A., & Gerrard, Y. (2020). Hashtagging depression on Instagram: Towards a more inclusive mental health research methodology. New Media & Society, [published online ahead of print]. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820921349
**Gerrard, Y. (**2018). Beyond the hashtag: Circumventing content moderation on social media. New Media & Society, 20(12), 4492–4511. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818776611
Gerrard, Y. and Thornham, H. (2020). Content moderation: social media’s sexist assemblages. New Media and Society. 22(7): 1266-1286. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820912540.
4. Details of the impact
Gerrard’s research has led to wide-scale policy changes at two of the world’s most popular social media companies: Instagram and Tumblr (1 billion and ~400 million active users worldwide respectively, Statista, 2020). [Text removed for publication].
Her work also attracted the attention of the UK Government’s Centre for Data Ethics and Innovation ( S2) stating “ The research highlighted the need for Instagram and Tumblr to change how their recommendation systems work, to avoid suggesting dangerous content to vulnerable users”. Instagram and Tumblr have acted on all of the research recommendations.
Gerrard’s findings prompted multiple forms of impact for three beneficiaries: policymakers at Instagram and Tumblr, social media users who are suffering or recovering from an eating disorder, and members of the public. The significance of the impact is as follows:
Instagram: As a direct result of the media coverage Gerrard’s research ( R3) received, she was invited to become a member of Instagram and parent company Facebook’s Suicide and Self-Injury (SSI) Advisory Board, to contribute expertise to content policies about eating disorders ( S1).
[Text removed for publication]. Gerrard’s research brought to the Board:
First, the research and its subsequent publicity – which influenced a BBC investigation ( S5) – [Text removed for publication] led to users searching a “much greater” range of hashtags. This information has decreased the number of pro-eating disorder posts on Instagram: [Text removed for publication]. Thanks to Gerrard’s interventions, this means fewer people are posting dangerous content to Instagram and are instead using the platform’s resources to seek help.
Second, Gerrard’s research informed a new Instagram policy banning advertisements for weight loss products making ‘miraculous’ claims about their power to help people lose weight ( S6, S4). Gerrard was the only expert cited in Instagram’s press release, which said: “ We’ve sought guidance from external experts, including Dr Ysabel Gerrard in the UK, to make sure any steps to restrict and remove this content will have a positive impact on our community of over 1 billion people” ( S6). The Girlguiding charity was one of many organisations to highlight the value of the policy, saying “ every step like this helps build a world girls want to live in” ( S7).
Third, the research led Instagram to transform how it recommends content to users on its Explore page (which shows users new images they might be interested in seeing) ( R1, R2, R3). [Text removed for publication]. As a result, Gerrard worked with Instagram to tighten the criteria a post needs to meet before it can be recommended to people. This will decrease the chance that users will be exposed to posts promoting eating disorders. [Text removed for publication].
Tumblr: Tumblr has changed its content moderation policies in two key ways as a direct result of Gerrard’s research. First, after an invited visit to meet with Tumblr’s CEO and key policy figures, the company changed how it recommends eating disorder-related content to its users: [Text removed for publication]. Without this research, Tumblr would not have taken urgent steps to reduce the risk that graphic content might appear on a users’ feed.
Second, Gerrard authored Tumblr’s resources for Mental Health Awareness Month ( S9). Almost 400 million Tumblr users can access Gerrard’s post to learn about eating disorders and be signposted to health services. [Text removed for publication].
5. Sources to corroborate the impact
Letter, Associate Professor (Faculty of Law and member of Facebook’s Oversight Board), Queensland University of Technology. This letter explains the originality of the research findings and provides some metrics to demonstrate the scale of positive impact Gerrard had on Instagram in particular.
Research cited in a UK Government Centre for Data Ethics and Innovation report, ‘Online targeting: final report and recommendations’ https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/cdei-review-of-online-targeting/online-targeting-final-report-and-recommendations (February 2020).
Letter, Public Policy Associate, Facebook. This letter details the positive impact of Gerrard’s research on Facebook and Instagram’s content moderation policies, mainly how it has helped to prevent harmful imagery being recommended to the platforms’ users, and how the companies classify and control certain kinds of content.
Letter, Public Policy Manager (UK and Northern Europe), Instagram. This letter demonstrates how Gerrard’s research has helped to make Instagram a safer place for users, and explains how she will continue to work with the company to implement even more positive changes.
Research cited in a BBC Trending radio programme. ‘Do Instagram hashtags promote eating disorders?’: https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/w3csws7n (December 2018). This interview led the BBC to conduct its own investigation into harmful hashtags on Instagram, and as a direct result Instagram expanded its list of banned hashtags.
Media coverage portfolio. This demonstrates the significant international national impact of the research and impact on public opinion. The Guardian article ( p.1) includes the official Instagram press release, made by Emma Collins (Instagram Public Policy Manager).
Twitter post by the Girlguiding charity: https://twitter.com/Girlguiding/status/1174641536983871490. This message is one of many praising Instagram’s new policy on cosmetic surgery and weight loss-related advertisements, for which Gerrard was the only named expert contributor.
Letter, Director of Social Impact and Public Policy, Tumblr. This letter details the positive impact of Gerrard’s research on Tumblr’s content moderation policies, specifically commenting on how her interventions have helped to make the platform safer for vulnerable users.
Gerrard’s contribution to Tumblr’s Mental Health Awareness Month Post it Forward campaign, ‘Eating Disorders’: https://postitforward.tumblr.com/post/184849352618/far-too-often-we-equate-the-perception-of-others (May 2019). This is a post that Gerrard authored for Mental Health Awareness Month. In it, she signposts Tumblr’s userbase to eating disorder resources, provides information about the condition and shares users’ stories of recovery.