Skip to main

Impact case study database

The impact case study database allows you to browse and search for impact case studies submitted to the REF 2021. Use the search and filters below to find the impact case studies you are looking for.

Search and filter

Filter by

  • Teesside University
   None selected
  • 32 - Art and Design: History, Practice and Theory
   None selected
   None selected
   None selected
   None selected
   None selected
   None selected
Waiting for server
Download currently selected sections for currently selected case studies (spreadsheet) (generating)
Download currently selected case study PDFs (zip) (generating)
Download tags for the currently selected case studies (spreadsheet) (generating)
Currently displaying text from case study section
Showing impact case studies 1 to 4 of 4
Submitting institution
Teesside University
Unit of assessment
32 - Art and Design: History, Practice and Theory
Summary impact type
Cultural
Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
No

1. Summary of the impact

Research at the Centre for Culture and Creativity at Teesside University has introduced the public to new ways of interpreting commemoration of the 1916 Easter Rising and deepened understanding of how historical objects and events are used to create meaning and frame conversations in the present. Our research has empowered audiences, from local groups to the Irish diaspora, to share memories and exchange ideas, illuminating and challenging their assumptions about past events. Through partnerships with cultural institutions, community groups and the media, research on commemoration has provided an interpretative framework for historical memory which is inclusive of diverse traditions, creating space for greater public empathy and understanding.

2. Underpinning research

Higgins has published extensively on the significance of the 1916 Easter Rising and how its meaning has changed over time. The Rising has become an iconic event that is imbued with immense, if volatile, social and political power. As a result, Easter 1916 has been used through its commemorations to convey cultural and societal values and to underpin contemporary political and economic positions. In interpreting this process, Higgins’s work asserts that anniversaries of the Rising are best understood as discursive spaces. She has shown how the significance of Easter Week 1916 has lain more in its symbolic capital than in the literal reading of events. The meaning of the Rising, Higgins argues, is not stable but is instead an ongoing negotiation among a range of constituents, including historians, politicians, artists, intellectuals and other members of the public.

The initial focus of Higgins’s work was on the fiftieth anniversary of the Rising and demonstrated how, in 1966, the commemoration was used as a medium through which to showcase Irish modernity and as a platform for debates over the future direction of the Irish economy and society. [3.1] Higgins’s work also argues however that 1916 commemorations became vehicles through which legitimacy was both asserted and challenged. The memory of the Rising has been deployed to underscore the authority of the state but, as a revolutionary moment, it has also offered socialists, feminists and republicans a way of challenging that authority. Higgins’s research provides a way of understanding how representations of the past can carry heightened political currency by being given different emphasis and meaning by successive generations. In this way, the research reveals history to be an ongoing process of co-creation, emerging from communities and societies, reimagining and retelling stories of the past. Higgins has shown how the Easter Rising was being mythologised even as it unfolded and the Irish revolution, during which the Rising took place, was being commemorated before it had ended. Her work on these aspects of memory and commemoration highlights that the line between past and present is extremely porous [3.1, 3.2, 3.3].

Much of the choreography of commemorations of the Easter Rising was established during its first anniversary and Higgins’s work, in tracing patterns of remembrance across one hundred years, shows how rituals and material objects were used to sustain the idea that the integrity of the original event was being recaptured in annual observance [3.2]. However, her work also shows that each act of commemoration reshapes and re-imagines that which is being remembered and the material of the past has the potential to represent covert, illicit, defiant memories and offer receptacles of resistance to formalized social memory. Higgins argues that the success of the Easter Rising as a commemorative instrument lies not in its certainties but in its adaptability in the nation’s memory [3.2, 3.3]. The original event is perceived as a rupture in the imaginative horizon and its memory carries the weight of both great hope and extreme disillusionment. As a result, significant anniversaries of the Easter Rising are freighted with emotional and political expectation [3.2, 3.3].

Higgins’s work demonstrates the ways in which commemorations are multi-layered processes that enable communities to make sense of the present through engagement with history. Her research is animated by the view that the memory of the past is never settled. It reveals the dynamic interplay between past and present and how it can be used to challenge historical certainties and to open up spaces of creativity and critical engagement [3.1, 3.2].

3. References to the research

[3.1] Higgins R. 2016. The ‘incorruptible inheritors of 1916’: the battle for ownership of the fiftieth anniversary of the Easter Rising. Saothar: The Journal of Irish Labour History. Summer, 33-44. Selected for REF2021.

[3.2] Higgins R. 2016. ‘The Irish Republic was proclaimed by poster’: The politics of commemorating the Easter Rising. In Grayson R, McGarry F. eds. Remembering 1916. Cambridge University Press. 43-61. Selected for REF2021.

[3.3] Higgins R. 2017. Commemoration and the Irish Revolution. In Crowley J, O’Driscoll D, Murphy M, Borganovo J. eds. Atlas of the Irish Revolution. Cork University Press. 848-856.

4. Details of the impact

Higgins’s research has shaped understanding of historical memory by engaging the public in active processes of memory work, creating spaces of commemoration and opening up conversations about the relationship between the past and present. The research has provided an interpretative framework for subjects ranging from the Easter Rising to the history of everyday objects. By challenging historical certainties and listening to multiple voices, the research has made room for participants to question cultural and social assumptions and to develop avenues for greater understanding between the north and south of Ireland and within Irish communities abroad.

The EUR10,000,000 GPO Museum is a permanent visitor attraction located within the historic GPO (General Post Office) building on O’Connell Street, Dublin. It was opened in 2016 and seeks to provide a highly immersive and engaging exhibition that tells the story of the events of Easter Week in 1916. Research undertaken at Teesside University on Irish history and commemoration informed directly the shape and concept of the museum’s Commemoration Gallery. Employed as a historical consultant, Higgins wrote the content for the gallery’s full-wall panel which charts the history of Ireland, North and South, in the decades after the Rising. (This was the only section of the exhibition that had government input, from the Department of Foreign Affairs, which reviewed and commented on the narrative to ensure it was a balanced and fair account) [5.1]. For the then Head of Content at Martello Media Ltd (who led the content team for the GPO Witness History exhibition), Roisín’s input ‘contributed to us improving the quality of evidence, enhancing public understanding and potentially challenging cultural values and social assumptions…Roisín played an essential role in bringing together such an important, and sensitive, narrative’ [5.1]. At the museum’s opening in Dublin in 2016 the Irish Minister for Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht described it as one of the flagship projects in the Centenary Programme and ‘a fantastic addition to Dublin’s bustling tourism sector, enhancing the city’s heritage offering for locals and visitors alike’ [5.2]. The GPO Museum received over 180,000 visitors in its first year [5.1b]. It won both the Best Cultural Experience at the 2017 Irish Tourism Industry Awards and the 2017 European Museum Academy Luigi Micheletti Award in 2017 [5.3]. The judges for the Luigi Micheletti Award said: ‘the Centre is a perfect example of 20th century history in retrospect, dealing in an even-handed way with a very emotive subject, which would have been impossible even a decade ago. It is an extraordinary achievement, an historical challenge [which] has been transformed into a reconciliation centre which also poses questions for the future. Our warmest congratulations go to the whole team’ [5.3]. For the then Education Manager at the GPO Museum: ‘the judges made specific reference to the fact that the narrative did not stop after the Irish Civil War, but in fact examined the contested recent history of the north of Ireland. They stated that [the GPO Museum] is a centre of peace and reconciliation. Roisín’s valuable contribution was pivotal to this’ [5.1].

Research on Irish history and commemoration undertaken by Higgins has also shaped public discourse through a range of different media. Higgins, for instance, was commissioned in 2016 by the Arts Council of Ireland to write a reflective essay which responded to the multi-layered memory traces in the musical programme of the televised centenary concert, A Nation’s Voice and was invited to write the explanatory text for a section of the multi-media online exhibition 1916: Weaving Private and Public Narratives [5.4]. Higgins’s contribution explained the significance of material objects in both anchoring the memory of the Rising and also providing symbols of potential resistance. The exhibition was hosted by the Digital Repository of Ireland in association with the National Archives, National Library and National Museum of Ireland [5.5].

In recognition of the fact that her research on issues of memory and commemoration in Irish history ‘commands enormous respect’, Higgins participated in the Department of Foreign Affairs-funded Easter Rising Centenary programme for the diaspora [5.6]. She was invited to speak at events in Rome (Roma Tre, Jan. 2016); Boston (Boston College, March 2016) Atlanta (Georgia State University, (April 2016) and Melbourne (University of Melbourne and Victoria University, April 2016) and, one host noted, ‘made a vital contribution to the overall success’ of the programme [5.6]. During the Centenary period, Higgins gave fifteen public talks on remembering the Rising in venues ranging from Dungiven Parish Hall (March 2016); Coolock Civic Centre, Dublin (April 2016); and Moyle District Council Buildings, Ballycastle (August 2016). In Ballymena, Co. Antrim (August, 2016), a local political representative noted that the audience had gained a new understanding of how it was possible to question some aspects of the past without feeling that everything important would unravel, an important reflection in a divided society [5.7].

Higgins’s work on material objects as receptacles of memory led to her role as presenter on National Treasures, a television programme broadcast on RTÉ in 2018. Described as ‘an anti-capitalist Antiques’ Roadshow’, it told the history of Ireland through objects brought by members of the public to televised events across the country [5.8]. It was an example of history being co-created by a number of constituencies. Items selected by Higgins and her co-presenters formed an exhibition at the National Museum of Ireland, Country Life. One of the producers of the show noted that Higgins’s ‘knowledge, research and expertise informed the roadshow, exhibition, television series, digital archive and follow-on book, providing the historical merit and emotional triggers to generate wide audience engagement. … she contributed to a huge degree in the success of the project’ [5.9]. The National Treasures project had significant reach. The viewing figures for the television series received a 25% audience share (380,000 viewers) which then increased to 30% by end of the four episodes. The expected viewership for RTÉ in this slot (6.30pm on a Sunday) is 15%. The number of visitors to the Country Life Museum increased by 25% after the television programme was broadcast [5.10] and it was noted that ‘an all-island project exploring the contentious history was a huge challenge and Roisín was a key to surmounting that challenge’ [5.10]. One viewer tweeted how they had enjoyed the show’s concept and that it had put history in hands of the people [5.12]. Another expressed how National Treasures had provided a platform for discussing objects with contested histories [5.12].

Higgins’s research on Irish history and the Easter Rising has led to a more nuanced and deeper public understanding and engagement with the complexities of commemorating the revolutionary period. The importance of this work is best reflected in a 2020 speech by the President of Ireland as part of a Centenary Commemorations Address which directly references Higgins’s research. As he states: ‘commemoration [is] an important aspect of ethical remembering. However, discretion is required with regard to how we mark important historical events, particularly those that may be exploited for narrow political or partisan purposes…Time and again, we have seen how history can be used and abused for insidious, morally dubious, purposes. As historian Roisín Higgins puts it, “[The] fractious nature of the revolutionary period has created many possibilities for commemorative events, as well as a great deal of potential for division”’ [5.12]. Higgins’s research, in acknowledging and understanding the divisive nature of certain aspects of the past, has shaped memory spaces and public conversations that are reflective and inclusive in the present.

5. Sources to corroborate the impact

[5.1] Email correspondence (pdf) from the GPO Museum team. Testimonial from the Head of Content at Martello Media (2014-2016). Received on 01 March 2019. Testimonial from the Education Manager at GPO Museum (2016-18). Received on 08 February 2019.

[5.2] News item (pdf and link). Merrion Street. 2016. Taoiseach opens GPO Witness History Visitor Centre. Available at: https://merrionstreet.ie/en/news-room/releases/taoiseach_opens_gpo_witness_history_visitor_centre.html

[5.3] Webpages for awards (pdf and link). Luigi Micheletti Award. 2017. Luigi Micheletti Award 2017 Winner: GPO Witness History – Dublin (Ireland). Available at: https://www.luigimichelettiaward.eu/winners/dettaglio_winner.asp?id=79. Irish Tourism Industry Awards. 2017. Irish Tourism Industry Awards 2017 – The Winners. Available at: https://www.irishtourismindustryawards.ie/2017-winners/

[5.4] Webpage (pdf and link). Arts Council Ireland. 2016. A Nation’s Voice: A Response by Roisín Higgins. Available at: http://www.artscouncil.ie/Art-2016/A-Nation_s-Voice/

[5.5] Webpage (pdf and link). Inspiring Ireland. Remembering the Rising. In 1916: Weaving Private and Public Narratives, exhibition hosted by the Digital Repository of Ireland. Available at: https://inspiring-ireland.ie/search/1916-weaving-public-private-narratives

[5.6] Signed Letters (pdf). Testimonial from Professor at Boston College (USA). Received 24 October 2020. Testimonial from Professor at University of York (UK). Received 23 October 2020.

[5.7] Email correspondence (pdf). Testimonial from Philip McGuigan MLA, organiser of Ballymena Braid Centre event. Received 26 October 2020.

[5.8] Review (pdf and link). Irish Times. 2018. National Treasures: a hoarder’s dream, like an anti-capitalist Antiques Roadshow. Available at: https://www.irishtimes.com/culture/tv-radio-web/national-treasures-a-hoarder-s-dream-like-an-anti-capitalist-antiques-roadshow-1.3454816

[5.9] Signed Letter (pdf). Testimonial from Produced of National Treasures. EZ Films. Received on 02 May 2019.

[5.10] Email correspondence (pdf). Testimonial from Education & Learning Manager at the National Museum of Ireland – Country Life. Received 13 December 2018.

[5.11] Collated Tweets (pdf) from the public about National Treasures. 08 April 2018 to 15 April 2018.

[5.12] Transcript (pdf and link). President of Ireland. 2020. Centenary Commemorations Address. Of Centenaries and the Hospitality Necessary in Reflecting on Memory, History and Forgiveness. Available at: https://president.ie/en/diary/details/president-hosts-machnamh-100-event/speeches

Submitting institution
Teesside University
Unit of assessment
32 - Art and Design: History, Practice and Theory
Summary impact type
Cultural
Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
No

1. Summary of the impact

Directly tackling the lack of disability representation within the arts and mainstream media, artistic research at Teesside University has sought to ensure that the creativity of those with disabilities as well as their histories and their stories are presented “centre stage”. This work has generated new audiences through new forms of artistic expression at popular and accessible venues (Southbank Centre, Channel 4), documented and preserved forgotten histories (Beamish Museum, BBC) and shaped approaches to arts management and heritage preservation in both the UK and Ireland, altering the level of ambition for disability arts within civil society partner organisations (Cork City Council, Arts Council Ireland).

2. Underpinning research

15% (1 Billion) of the world’s population has an impairment, with over 135 million people in the World Health Organisation (WHO) European Region having a long-standing health problem or impairment leading to disability (as identified by WHO). Yet disabled people are often invisible within shared cultural spaces and excluded from cultural production and consumption. Artistic research at the Centre for Culture and Creativity at Teesside University has sought to elevate and make visible marginalised disabled people and their histories. Using art and design along with technology as a focal point to drive engagement, the works of McKeown have brought together creative and curatorial practice with historical and social research to challenge cultural assumptions and societal views of normality and difference.

In works such as All for Claire (2010) and Motion Disabled (2009), video gaming techniques and motion capture technologies are combined to provide insight into motion and disability as well as concepts of power and provenance [3.1, 3.2]. These works focus the viewer’s attention on perceptions of normality and difference that exist within contemporary culture. All for Claire is animation that examines themes of power, control and rejection and seeks to challenge hegemonic discourse about disability. Working with internationally recognised dancer and disabled performer Claire Cunningham, motion capture technology was used to create an animation that effectively realised Cunningham’s unique movements. In Motion Disabled (MD) (2009) and the revised Paralympic edition Motion Disabled Unlimited (MDU) (2012), a large inflatable sculpture was coupled with a series of motion capture videos to focus the viewer’s attention on the disabled body and disabled movement. Animated short films were created by recording the physical movements of fourteen physically impaired people with conditions such as Spina Bifida, Cerebral Palsy and Brittle Bones (MD) and eight Paralympians including Baroness Tanni Grey-Thompson (MDU). By removing all identifying features from the digital avatars, the viewers’ attention is focused on physicality and movement. Motion Disabled rewrites a narrative of impaired movement that is rooted in difficulty and disadvantage to one focused on power, strength, and creativity.

Cork Ignite (2015) and We Are Still Here (2018) build on these works, but with the focus now on how large-scale public events can be harnessed to further challenge perceptions of disability and disability arts [3.3, 3.4]. In these dynamic and celebratory interventions, public and participants are enabled to see and present themselves, and their social relations, equitably. By presenting disability arts within a civic mainstream space, these works confront the perceived low value definitions of art practice for people with disabilities that are all too often marginalised. Cork Ignite sought to transform conventional event production and consumption through an inclusive collaborative practice that ensured disability arts and participant voices were placed centre stage [3.3]. In We Are Still Here this research was furthered through coproduced work with people with learning disabilities [3.4]. Through a research process that combined arts practice with event management and civic debate, We Are Still Here supported cocreators and participants to become active cultural producers and generate a large-scale public event.

Commissioned by Arts Admin for 14-18 NOW and Channel 4, Ghosts (2014) is a video installation that highlights the narrative of global impairment in World War 1 (WW1) that has been largely lost in modern commemoration and museum representations [3.5]. Through historical/archival research into impairment caused by WW1 and the study of contemporaneous imagery and music, McKeown challenged the singularity of global war commemoration culture with its customary focus on surviving heroes. Again, drawing on technology as a mode for engagement, the project brings together research into disability within war curation with motion capture and digital technologies for sound and vision to create an installation that is historically authentic and aesthetically engaging.

The Carrying of Passengers is Forbidden (2018-2019) further develops McKeown’s interest in the intersection between disability history and technology through an examination of the UK Government development and national distribution of (legally defined) ‘invalid carriages’ in the twentieth century [3.6]. Unlike any other motor vehicle with UK (and Commonwealth) distribution, the history of the invalid carriage had almost vanished from national memory. As part of this research, McKeown created one of the largest collections of invalid carriages in the UK and developed a substantial archive of historical ephemera (photographs, postcards, car design blue prints, design history, government documents, national archive and disability campaign material, licensed film material and video interviews). Challenging normative approaches to museology, McKeown’s work reintegrates these largely forgotten objects and their histories into UK national memory through an extensive research, artistic and public engagement project that demanded a more holistic, inclusive approach to mainstream motoring history.

3. References to the research

[3.1] McKeown S. 2010. All for Claire. Dada Fest International. Liverpool, UK. Available at: https://research.tees.ac.uk/en/publications/all-for-claire. Selected for REF2014 (2014 portfolio available).

All for Claire was sponsored by DaDaFest 10 International and BBC BigScreen. It was awarded Best Experimental Film at the UK’s Deaffest, Wolverhampton in May 2011. It has been screened internationally at Bosifest, Serbia 2011, New York City Film Festival, August, 2011, Moving Image Film Festival, 2011, Animax Animation Festival, Skopje, November 2011 and Picture This Film Fest, Calgary, Canada, February 2012. All for Claire was shown on the BBC Big Screens in 21 locations nationwide in 2010 and 2011.

[3.2] McKeown S. 2009. Motion Disabled. Wolverhampton Art Gallery, UK. Available at: https://research.tees.ac.uk/en/publications/motion-disabled. Selected for REF2014 (2014 portfolio available).

Motion Disabled was supported by funding from the Wellcome Trust. grid.52788.30. 2007. Motion Disabled: Disable Motion. 084790/Z/08/Z. GBP36,370. Lead: McKeown. Motion Disabled was adapted in 2012 as Motion Disabled: Unlimited. They have been exhibited internationally in over 70 locations and venues, indoors and outdoors. In 2010 promoted by VSA Arts (Kennedy Center, Washington D.C, USA) the work was simultaneously exhibited in 17 countries in 24 venues and locations on the 3rd of December in support of the United Nations International Day of People with Disabilities.

[3.3] McKeown S. 2015. Cork Ignite 2015. Cork, Ireland. Available at https://research.tees.ac.uk/en/publications/cork-ignite-we-are-still-here-3. Selected for REF2021 (portfolio available).

Cork Ignite attracted a live audience of over 7,000 people. Cork Ignite was a unique partnership involving Arts Council Ireland, Arts & Disability Ireland (Dublin), Create (Dublin), Cork City Council, Galway City and County Councils, and Mayo County Council. It was supported by funding form Arts Council Ireland.

[3.4] McKeown S. 2018. We Are Still Here. St Helen’s, UK. Available at: https://research.tees.ac.uk/en/publications/we-are-still-here-st-helens-100th-year-anniversary. Selected for REF2021 (portfolio available).

We Are Still Here was created by McKeown for partners Heart of Glass and DaDaFest International 2018. The project was supported by funding from St Helens Council, DaDaFest, Arts Council England, Creative People and Places, Culture Liverpool, The Granada Foundation and Teesside University. Heart of Glass managed the project which formed the culmination of St Helens 150th year long celebrations.

[3.5] McKeown, S. 2014. Ghosts. Channel 4, UK. Available at: https://research.tees.ac.uk/en/publications/ghosts-3/. Selected for REF2021 (portfolio available).

This work was commissioned by Arts Admin for 14-18 NOW and Channel 4 to be showcased on Channel 4 (28/7/2014) and its online platform 4OD (2014) as part of the 14-18 NOW, the UK Government’s WW1 commemoration programme. 14-18-NOW was part of the WW1 Centenary Art Commissions, a programme of special commissions by leading artists from Britain (including Rachel Whiteread, Sir Peter Blake and Yinka Shonibare) and around the world to mark the centenary of the First World War. Ghosts additionally featured on 14-18-NOW WW1 website, as well as at festivals, such as Unlimited at the London South Bank Centre.

[3.6] McKeown, S. 2018 The Carrying of the Passengers is Forbidden. Available at: https://research.tees.ac.uk/en/publications/the-carrying-of-passengers-is-forbidden-invalid-carriages-and-the. Selected for REF2021 (portfolio available).

This work was funded by the Heritage Lottery Fund (HLF). grid.507557.5. 2018. ‘The Carrying of Passengers is Forbidden' - Invalid Carriages and their Heritage. OH-17-07626. GBP52,900. The research has been exhibited at the UK Disability Art festival, DaDaFest International, Museum of Liverpool, St Georges Hall Liverpool, Thought Foundation Birtley, Finchale Group Durham, Disability North Newcastle, and Preston Park Museums and Grounds Stockton-on-Tees. McKeown further curated the largest demonstration of invalid carriages in the UK in over 20 years and placed them equitably alongside mainstream vehicles in the Transport Through Time event at Beamish – The Living Museum of the North, Durham (October-November 2019).

4. Details of the impact

Since 2014, McKeown’s research-led artworks, installations, and interventions have been exhibited internationally (UK, Ireland, Czech Republic, Greece, Germany, Australia) in 19 venues, as well as archived online (BFI Permanent Collection) and screened on national TV networks (BBC, Channel 4, Forces TV). Through engagement with a diverse range of venues, McKeown’s work has extended the reach of disability arts and history into mainstream television, city and town centres, and entertainment and culture venues bringing new audiences to disability arts and heritage. Venues have ranged from regional museums (Preston Park Museum and Grounds, Stockton-on-Tees) to open air heritage venues (Beamish, The Living Museum of the North), from town and city centres (St Helens, Cork) to prime time television (BBC, Channel 4), from the Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park (Mayor of London’s Liberty Festival) to events championing regional innovation (Great Exhibition of the North), and from cultural hubs and galleries (London South Bank Centre) to international art and film festivals (DaDaFest International, Adelaide Film Festival) [5.1].

The venues and platforms reflect the diverse audiences that have engaged with this research and the importance attributed by the organisers, commissioners, programmers and produces to engaging new audiences with disability arts and disability history. For the Director of Create, Ireland’s national development agency for collaborative arts, Cork Ignite ‘opened up a whole vista for people in terms of a compelling, unique public artwork, that spoke of inclusivity, spoke of ambition, it spoke of making our public spaces in the city alive and speak back to the public’. [5.2].

By preserving and documenting hidden histories of disability, this research has ensured continued representation within a range of cultural spaces. All for Claire (2010), for instance, was selected in 2019 for the BFI’s Disabled Britain on Film permanent collection, attesting to its importance in capturing and raising the visibility of disabled people [5.3]. The commissioning of Ghosts for Channel4 and the subsequent awards it has received signal the importance of this work in voicing and documenting disability history in a new and engaging ways. The five-part series (Does it matter?) that featured Ghosts received an award for Performance under Ten Minutes at the Picture This film festival (Calgary, Canada) in 2015. For the jury of the Picture This film festival, the five-part series was: ‘an eclectic series exploring war from a point of view seldom seen in mainstream media ... informing and entertaining ... very powerful and engaging’ [5.4, p. 7]. Ghosts has also won an award of merit for disability issues from the Accolade Global Film Completion 2016); an award from the Respect Human Rights Film Festival (Belfast, 2017); and award for first place in the Non-Documentary Division of the Cinema Touching Disability film festival (Texas USA, 2016). [5.5]

McKeown’s work on creatively recovering and resurfacing disability histories led to investment from HLF to preserve disability heritage in the form of living memories and artefacts, preventing loss of this history through destruction, neglect, or export. The project led to: McKeown becoming the Director of the Invalid Carriage Register and a modernisation of the Invalid Carriage Register (which maintains records of known invalid carriages); the first comprehensive list of disability vehicles in public ownership; and the retention by The Science Museum of rare and significant vehicles of disability history that were being considered for disinvestment of stock. [5.6]. The exhibition of these vehicles and their social histories has attracted audiences both new and old. The Chief Executive Officer of the Finchale Group remarked that: ‘it was certainly an object of curiosity and great interest for our more modern-day veterans and attendees…on every occasion, the display drew comments and generated a great deal of interest. As a result, Finchale Group has been inspired to investigate and preserve its own history: for example, we have recently uncovered some historical photographs of disability vehicles that have a clear and direct link to our organisation’s past’ [5.7].

McKeown’s research on invalid carriages has supported the development of three television programmes that have each sought to centre the almost forgotten history of the disability carriage within mainstream public consciousness. McKeown’s research contributed the BBC’s The NHS: A People’s History (2018), Channel 4’s Great British Car Journeys (2019), and to Forces TV’s Saving The Forgotten Invalid Carriage (2019) [5.8]. The interview for Forces TV was also made available on their TV website [5.8]. The dedicated airtime from national TV networks is reflective of both the emerging public interest in this space and the role McKeown’s research has played in generating and shaping content for these audiences. For the Director of the BBC’s The NHS: A People’s History, McKeown’s was work crucial to developing the narrative: ‘at the time of production we found it very difficult to determine a coherent narrative from normal sources such as Google, as there is very little online and quite a lot of it inaccurate. Simon's research has enabled 7Wonder to interpret and understand the complexities of the 1970's Invalid Carriage and to place their use within the context of the time’ [5.9].

In addition, events such as Cork Ignite and We Are Still Here have generated significant and transformative cultural moments that have helped to redefine space and place. For the Chief Executive of Heart of Glass, the charity that commissioned We Are Still Here for St Helen’s: ‘the event was a very bold statement that brought into focus those frequently marginalised within the arts and cultural sector. It enabled a disabled artist and learning disabled within St Helen's to take centre stage at the one hundred and fiftieth anniversary of the town in a bombastic way that's hard to ignore [5.10]. For the then Director of Corporate Affairs at Cork City Council: ‘Fans of digital technology and design are still talking about the detailed, painstaking work that it took to produce Ignite. Those who know nothing of that still talk about the entertainment value of the show. And the people with disabilities who were involved will always be proud, not only of their work, but of the fact that their abilities were recognised in such a public way in their city. Cork businesses took the project to their hearts, and used its impressive images to promote the city and their own place within it [5.11].

Significantly, the three part Ignite series of which Cork was a part has subsequently led to Arts Council Ireland (ACI) reflecting on their roles in supporting disability arts, particularly within public spaces, sparking institutional change. The Ignite series, for example, helped inform the development of a signed agreement between Cork County and City Management Association and the Arts Council [5.12]. As stated by the Arts Director for Performing and Local Arts at Arts Council Ireland (ACI): ‘this Framework for Collaboration was rooted in learning from the Ignite events and includes a commitment to focusing on arts and disability and details on how this work might be supported in the future’ [5.12]. The Ignite series also led ACI to reconsider the upper limit for their Arts Participation Project Award, which was increased to EUR60,000 post Ignite to facilitate great ambition demonstrated by these events [5.12]. More specifically, ACI have recognised the significance of Cork Ignite for disability arts: ‘the visibility of Simon’s project was also enormously valuable. It was a landmark initiative that built on years of work and practice. It demonstrated both the ambition and quality of disability arts and the importance of incorporating disability arts within mainstream arts and culture’ [5.12].

5. Sources to corroborate the impact

[5.1] Consolidated publicity material (pdf). List of events, exhibitions, screenings. September 2013 to 2019.

[5.2] Radio Broadcast. UCC Radio. 2019. Cork Ignite Broadcast. Available at: https://youtu.be/ON8sQ5wBTgI

[5.3] Webpage and email correspondence (pdf and link). BFI Film Collection. All for Claire (2011). Available at: https://player.bfi.org.uk/free/film/watch-all-for-claire-2011-online. Email correspondence (pdf) from the curator at the British Film Institute confirming entry into collection. Received 16 August 2018.

[5.4] Brochure (pdf and link). Picture This Film Festival. 2015. Brochure: 14th Annual Picture this…Film Festival. Calgary. Available at: https://www.ptff.org/files/2015-catalogue-and-cover-openo-v1-21-final-feb-26-2015-for-web-200dpi80p-pdf.pdf

[5.5] Collated awards (pdf). Announcement of awards for Ghosts at Accolade Global Film Competition, Respect Human Rights Film Festival and Cinema Touching Disability film festival. 2016 and 2017.

[5.6] Final Report (pdf). Teesside University. Heritage Lottery Completion Report: ‘The Carrying of Passengers is Forbidden' - Invalid Carriages and their Heritage (2018-2020). Report submitted to HLF on 03 February 2021.

[5.7] Signed Letter (pdf). Testimonial from Chief Executive Director of the Finchale Group. Received on 08 March 2021.

[5.8] Documentary listings and Screenshots (pdf). BBC. 2018. The NHS: A People’s History. Episodes 1-3). Channel 4. 2019. Great British Car Journeys. Series 2, episode 1. ForcesTV. 2019. Saving the forgotten Invalid Carriage. MP4s for each programme are available.

[5.9] Signed Letters (pdf). Testimonial from the Producer/Director of The NHS: A People’s History (7Wonder). Received on 10 May 2018.

[5.10] Signed Letter (pdf). Testimonial from Chief Executive of Heart of Glass. Received on 03 March 2021.

[5.11] Email correspondence (pdf). Testimonial from the Director of Corporate Affairs at from Cork City Council. Received on 05 October 2015.

[5.12] Signed Letter (pdf). Testimonial from Arts Director, Performing and Local Arts, Arts Council Ireland, email received 15 March 2021.

Submitting institution
Teesside University
Unit of assessment
32 - Art and Design: History, Practice and Theory
Summary impact type
Cultural
Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
No

1. Summary of the impact

The constituent-led and engaged approach to curatorial practice devised and implemented at Teesside University’s Middlesbrough Museum of Modern Art has stimulated sector discussion on the role of museums and galleries (Arts Council England, Wellcome Collection); shaped the curatorial practice of museums and galleries (Galleria Moderna) and enhanced cultural engagement and understanding with a diverse range of regional audiences through the design and development of exhibitions and events held at the Middlesbrough Institute of Modern Art on topics of importance to local audiences such as migration, regional industry, and the natural world, evoking resonant links between past, present and future through 57 exhibitions and 407 events.

2. Underpinning research

Since 2014, researchers at the Centre for Creativity and Culture have undertaken curatorial research on the role of museums and galleries, developing and refining the concept of a “useful” and constituent-engaged museum that is driven by regional approaches to, and understandings of, creativity, heritage, and place. Merging curatorial theory with curatorial practice, the research team have tested, embedded and shared their research through Teesside University’s Middlesbrough Institute of Modern Art (MIMA).

Research-led exhibitions at MIMA, such as Localism (2015), If All Relations Were To Reach Equilibrium This Building Would Dissolve (2016), This is Water (2018), and Fragile Earth (2019) have each sought to shift curatorial focus away from traditional and metropolitan notions of judgement, taste and legitimacy towards a self-conscious, museum-led ambition to “dig where we stand” [3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4]. The research of Hudson, Morgan, Amado and Stewart places engagement and education at the centre of their curatorial approach. Their research abandons the approach that emerged in the 1980s, still with us today, that sees arts initiatives as yoked to ‘enterprise’, new lifestyles and property regeneration across northern cities. This is a particularly provocative approach that unsettles widely held notions of regeneration, public engagement, and community work.

Taking forward the concept for Arte Útil developed by Argentine artist Eduardo Costa, Localism (Hudson and Morgan) interrogates the idea of the “useful museum” [3.1]. Taking a deliberately ‘localist’ approach to curation and working in partnership with regional communities to shape the exhibition, Localism enabled Tees Valley communities to reclaim the museum space. A ‘family tree’ of creativity on Teesside was established through the gathering of artefacts and artworks, and displays were regularly updated based on public feedback and contributions. A forum for public meetings, debates and conversations which were prompted by the exhibition was also provided. Some of the topics Localism addressed included Christopher Dresser and the Linthorpe Pottery, bridge building, the Boosbeck Industries in the 1930s and the existence of mima itself. Local artists were supported to set up workshops teaching skills such as furniture design, weaving and pottery making, skills linked to local heritage and the ‘forgotten’ trades of the region.

The exhibition If All Relationships Were to Reach Equilibrium, Then This Building Would Dissolve (Amado) builds on the ideas developed in Localism and explores the subject of migration on Teesside and elsewhere [3.2]. The exhibition brought together documents, artefacts and artworks made by Middlesbrough-based asylum seekers and refugees as well as British and international artists. Working in collaboration with charities that work with Middlesbrough-based asylum seekers and refugees, the exhibition went beyond awareness raising and formed part of an ongoing process of relationship building with local communities and organisations with the region. A key element of the exhibition and development of the format devised in Localism was the use of parts of the gallery as a centre for service provision, learning and debate. Free resources include a suite of computers with Internet access, a food bank, workshops, readings, film club, and awareness-raising sessions, as well as activities for making and convening such as a communal weekly lunch, art classes and ESOL (English to speakers of other languages) courses.

Furthering this work, the exhibition This is Water (Morgan) explored the long histories of migration that have forged the current shape of the UK [3.3]. As a town founded on the rapid immigration of workers in the nineteenth century, Middlesbrough provided fertile ground for exploring the commonalities and shared experiences of immigration as well as changing identities and perceptions. By working with a formalised group of constituent advisers, the exhibition brought together art, personal memorabilia, and archival documents as well as materials from the North East Film Archives to give a nuanced portrait of the region’s migration histories. During the exhibition, a repository of the stories and voices from the Tees Valley was collated, creating an archive of marginalised voices highlighting the complex identities that form the Tees Valley region and transforming the nature of what constitutes a museum object.

In Fragile Earth (Morgan), global and regional perspectives are brought into dialogue through an exhibition focused on the exploitation of resources, trade networks and production of waste within the socio-economic and ecological context of the Tees Valley [3.4]. The exhibition drew on 3 years of intensive research that foregrounded public dialogue between artists and ecology experts. Building on the idea of going beyond the exhibition, Fragile Earth consisted of a series of events and activities that took place across a whole year. The exhibition was used as a starting point to interrogate relationships between plants, animals and humans at a time of climate crisis and involved the work of 22 artists. This approach was combined with consultation with community groups through Design Thinking workshops and supplemented by interviews with international artists and curators. The result was a curatorial and community interrogation of colonial infrastructures, discourses in agriculture, botany, archaeology, as well as ecological conservation and technological determinism.

These exhibitions have been underpinned by theoretical and empirical research on curatorial theory and practice. The Constituent Museum (Morgan) examines the relationship between audience, expert and institution through an array of theoretical essays, case studies, and fictional writing. Morgan’s curatorial research informed the book’s conceptualisation [3.5]. Through sustained research spanning three years, Morgan edited texts, developed talks and staged a major conference, putting her research into dialogue with an international network of thinkers and influencing subsequent theory and practice. International contributors span specialisms in philosophy, education, social theory, art history and theory.

Work on art, critical pedagogy and capitalism (Stewart) has also furthered debates on both art and curatorial practice [3.6]. In this critical examination of art production, Stewart draws specific attention to the processes and context for art production. He argues that art practices with a social intent needs to involve a commitment to involvement to benefit those involved but not framed as participatory/participant through a critical understanding of the role of institutions, the contexts in which they operate, the bodies that occupy them, and the traditions, hierarchies and norms that influence how art and art institutions operate.

3. References to the research

[3.1] Hudson A, Morgan E. 2015. Localism [exhibition]. Middlesbrough Museum of Modern Art. Further details at: https://visitmima.com/whats-on/single/localism/.

The research underpinning this output was supported by a consortium grant from the EU Culture Programme. Uses of Art. EUR110,000. Lead: Van Abbemuseum in Eindhoven, Holland. Partners: Teesside University (Hudson), Ikon Gallery (Birmingham), Tate Liverpool, John Moores University, Whitworth Art Gallery (Manchester), FRAC Poitou-Charentes (Angoulême) and the Internationale confederation of European museums.

[3.2] Amado M. 2016. If All Relationships Were to Reach Equilibrium, Then This Building Would Dissolve [exhibition]. Middlesbrough Museum of Modern Art. Further details at: https://visitmima.com/news/if-all-relationships-were-to-reach-equilibrium-then-this-building-would-dissolve/.

Contributors and artists include the Collection of Investing in People and Culture, Right to Remain, Babi Badalov, Chto Delat, Burlesque Design, Lawrence Abu Hamdan, Isabel Lima, Stephanie Misa, and Zanny Begg & Oliver Ressler, among others. This exhibition was awarded the Journal Culture Award for North East Museum of the Year.

[3.3] Morgan E. 2018. This is Water [exhibition]. Middlesbrough Museum of Modern Art. Visitor Numbers: 26,491. Further details at: https://visitmima.com/whats-on/single/this-is-water/

Exhibiting artists: Nika Autor, Lucy Bridger, Ladan Hussein (Cold Specks) and Seth Pimlott, Jasleen Kaur, Andreja Kulunčić, Alenka Pirman, Erika Tan, Katarina Zdjelar.

This exhibition was supported by funding from the European Commission. Creative Europe Programme. grid.270680.b. 2017-2019. New Mappings of Europe. EACEA 45/2016. EUR200,000. Led by Moderna Galerija. Partners: Teesside University (Middlesbrough, UK), the Museum of Yugoslavia (Belgrade, Serbia), the Academy of Fine Arts (Vienna, Austria).

[3.4] Morgan E. 2019. Fragile Earth [exhibition]. Middlesbrough Museum of Modern Art. Visitor Numbers: 25,791. Selected for REF2021 (research portfolio available). Further details at https://visitmima.com/whats-on/single/fragile-earth-seeds-weeds-plastic-crust/

Exhibiting artists: Maria Thereza Alves, Zheng Bo, Allan Sekula and Noël Burch, Miriam de Búrca, Laura Harrington, Andy Holden, David Lisser, Shahar Livne, Anne Vibeke Mou, Otobong Nkanga, Uriel Orlow, Faiza Ahmad Khan and Hanna Rullman, Zina Saro-Wiwa, Cooking Sections, Mierle Laderman Ukeles, Diane Watson, Wayward.

[3.5] Byrne J, Morgan E, Paynter N, de Serdio AS, Železnik A. eds. 2018. The Constituent Museum. Valiz with L'internationale. Selected for REF2021 (research portfolio available).

The research underpinning this edited collection was supported by the funding listed in [3.1].

[3.6] Stewart P. 2020. Art, Critical Pedagogy and Capitalism. Routledge. Selected for REF2021 (research portfolio available).

This book offers a re-examination of art production through considering the process of learning as the production of art itself. The peer-review of this work, arranged by Routledge, stated ‘it could be a go to text on art schools and capitalism’.

4. Details of the impact

Middlesbrough Institute of Modern Art (MIMA) was incorporated into the University in 2014. It has provided the platform and mechanism for implementing this research into practice and for sharing practice-led research. In 2015, Hudson wrote a 2015-18 vision statement for MIMA that placed the idea of the “useful” museum at the heart of MIMA’s work. The aim was for MIMA to be ‘a place that is created and given meaning by the sum actions of all its users’ [5.1]. Through the exhibitions Localism, If All Relationships Were to Reach Equilibrium, This is Water, and Fragile Earth this ambition was tested, refined and realised, leading to MIMA’s 2019-22 Business Plan that articulates MIMA’s renewed focus on “art in action” and a constituent-engaged artistic programme [5.1]. Since 2015, MIMA has held 57 exhibitions and hosted 407 events. For context, MIMA receives 90,000 visitors a year.

Research-led exhibitions and events exploring the idea of a “useful”, constituent-led museum and held at MIMA have sought to provoke discussion on the role of museums, especially so in relation to community and place. MIMA’s work has led to representatives from both the Wellcome Collection and Museum of London visiting MIMA to learn more about their curatorial approach. For the Head of Engagement at the Museum of London, MIMA’s community board was particularly striking: ‘I was thinking about the community board and why it seems like such a radical thing to reach for – I’m glad to have it in my mind’s eye as an ambition to reach for’ [5.2]. According to the Acting Director of Moderna Galerija, Ljubljana, who led the EU New Mappings Project: ‘MIMA’s research into constituent-led approaches to creating public forums for discourse with diverse communities was key to the development of the project…the network of organisations learnt from MIMA’s community programmes, including Community Day and the Cultural Conversations programme with new communities. Through discussions and workshops, we adapted these methodologies and approaches in each of our projects’ [5.3]. For a formal reviewer from Arts Council England, the Localism exhibition ‘was intended to be a provocative exercise, one designed to whip up debate about both what the function of the museum is and can be and, more specifically, what mima’s role might be in the specific geographical and economic landscape within which it is located (and the challenges that come with that). In that respect, it was extremely successful’. [5.4]

As a result of this constituent-engaged approach to museum work, MIMA was included, in 2016, in the Calouste Gulbekian Foundation Inquiry into the Civic Role of Arts Organisations. MIMA was one of 80 international organisations to be featured in their case study bank that profiled best practice in civic engagement from around the world [5.5]. For the Director (North-North East) of Arts Council England: ‘MIMA’s research-informed approach to curatorial practice has led to a reinvention and challenging of the role of the museum, disrupting approaches within the sector. Seeing itself as a “useful museum”, MIMA seeks to influence society positively. For the Arts Council, this approach aligns well to our central mission of valuing the creativity of all, ensuring access to the arts and is one of the reasons for our continued investment in MIMA’ [5.6]. MIMA’s engaged approach was also cited by the Chair and Chief Executive (Sir Peter Bazalgette and Darren Henley) of Arts Council England in 2016 as part of the Countries of Culture inquiry, which launched in March to examine the wider cultural landscape. MIMA was selected as an example of the ‘growing contribution of universities, who want to make their local areas great places to work and study’ demonstrating the importance of MIMA’s work in rethinking not only the role of museums and galleries, but also the role Higher Education can play in community and civic engagement. This inquiry led to Arts Council shaping policies and approaches to building relationships with HEIs nationally. [5.6, 5.7].

The exhibitions and their associated events (talks, film club, lunches, and community days) have also enhanced cultural engagement with modern art through a curatorial approach that centres the interests and needs of the local community. For the senior editor at FREIZE, a leading magazine of contemporary art and culture, MIMA provides a ‘powerful rejection of how the art world, too often, reduces activism to radical cosplay. This is an era in which political culture is being reformed in ways that may well be far more dramatic than what happened in the 1980s, and that’s the context in which mima proposes an articulation, rather than imposition, of a democratic cosmopolitanism, charting a progressive path out of here’ [5.8]. For a reviewer for Art Agenda, an online ‘publisher of rigorous and engaging writing on contemporary art’, the curatorial approach to Fragile Earth enabled news of engaging with and thinking about climate change and ‘provides a welcome example of how to make a meaningful, thoughtful, and deeply humane exhibition about the complex and emotionally charged issue of climate change in the twenty-first century’ [5.8]. For a reviewer in the Gazette, Teesside’s local newspaper, If All Relations Were To Reach Equilibrium This Building Would spoke to the role museums can play in giving voice to marginalised communities: ‘For the many individuals fleeing Northern and Sub-Saharan Africa, parts of the Middle East and other regions this is a huge platform to give a voice and an understanding to a plight; and the humanity behind these people forming a part of a multi-cultured Teesside society’ [5.8]. This exhibition was subsequently featured on the Arts Council 2016/17 Annual Report as an example of an arts organisation ensuring ‘everyone has the opportunity to experience, and be inspired by, the arts, museums and libraries’. [5.9]

MIMA’s engaged approach has also contributed to the cultural offer of the Tees Valley, MIMA acting as an ‘important broker of sectoral discussion’. For the Creative Place Manager at Tees Valley Combined Authority: ‘Research undertaken by Teesside University researchers at the Middlesbrough Institute of Modern Art has made a significant contribution to our regional cultural offer, as well as local community engagement and cohesion. MIMA’s ethos as a museum owned and led by local communities drives positive change and the museum is a proactive hub where communities come together and reflect on ideas of place, culture, and identity. MIMA’s research-informed outreach programme goes beyond the museum’s walls, working with schools, THIRTEEN Housing Group, and nursing homes to develop a deep and meaningful engagement on issues of migration, climate change and regional industry’ [5.10].

MIMA’s role within the regional cultural economy of the Tees Valley is also seen through the continued investment and recognition of MIMA as a national portfolio organisation and for its important role within the North East [5.6]. Since 2014, Arts Council England have invested GBP4,086,056 in MIMA. More recently, an investment of GBP2,900,000 was made by Arts Council England’s Creative People and Places fund for a MIMA-led Borderlands programme. The programme seeks to build cultural engagement in two areas of Teesside with extremely low levels of participation [5.6].

5. Sources to corroborate the impact

[5.1] Strategy Documents (pdf). MIMA. 2015. Where do we go from here? A vision statement for 2015. And MIMA. 2018. MIMA Business Plan 2019-22.

[5.2] Email correspondence (pdf) from the Wellcome Trust (UK), received January 2019, and Museum of London (UK), received on March 2019.

[5.3] Signed Letter (pdf). Testimonial from Acting Director of the Moderna Galerija, Ljubljana, project lead for the EU Creative Europe New Mappings Project. Received on 18 February 2021.

[5.4] Artistic and Quality Assessment Form (pdf). Arts Council England. 2016. Review of Localism exhibition.

[5.5] Report (pdf and link). Calouste Gulbekian Foundation. 2017. Rethinking Relationships: Inquiry into the Civic Role of Arts Organisations. Gulbenkian Foundation UK Branch. Available at: https://gulbenkian.pt/uk-branch/our-work/the-civic-role-of-arts-organisations/phase-one-the-inquiry/.

[5.6] Signed Letter (pdf). Testimonial from Director (North – North East) of Arts Council England. Received 19 February 2021.

[5.7] News item (pdf and link). Arts Council England. 2016. CMS Select Committee: The Arts Council and the wider cultural landscape. Available at: https://www.artscouncil.org.uk/news/cms-select-committee-arts-council-and-wider-cultural-landscape

[5.8] Collection of reviews of exhibitions held at MIMA (pdf and link). Teesside Gazette. 2016. Meet the refugees making their home in Middlesbrough. Available at: https://www.gazettelive.co.uk/news/teesside-news/meet-refugees-making-home-middlesbrough-11577715. FREIZE. 2017. Postcard from Middlesbrough. Available at: https://www.frieze.com/article/postcard-middlesbrough. Art Agenda. 2019. Fragile Earth: seeds, weeds, plastic crust. Available at: https://www.art-agenda.com/features/286425/fragile-earth-seeds-weeds-plastic-crust.

[5.9] Report (pdf and link). Arts Council England. Annual Report 2016-17. Available at: https://www.artscouncil.org.uk/sites/default/files/download-file/Arts%20Council%20annual%20report%2016-17%20-%20Web%20version.pdf

[5.10] Signed Letter (pdf). Testimonial from Creative Place Manager at Tees Valley Combined Authority. Received on 24 February 2021.

Submitting institution
Teesside University
Unit of assessment
32 - Art and Design: History, Practice and Theory
Summary impact type
Cultural
Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
No

1. Summary of the impact

Research on regional cultural history, industrial decline and cultural regeneration has shaped cultural policy and enhanced cultural participation in the Tees Valley. Research has informed the development and delivery of a region-wide arts and culture project (Great Place Tees Valley; Tees Valley Combined Authority Creative Visitor Economy Recovery and Growth programme), supported regional arts and culture organisations to develop initiatives that have increased cultural participation (Tees Valley Arts); and underpinned the development of a flagship exhibition at Kirkleatham Museum in Redcar that has engaged new audiences and enabled new interpretations of Redcar’s industrial past (Steel Stories).

2. Underpinning research

Research at the Centre for Culture and Creativity at Teesside University on regional culture has focussed on the complexities of representing post-industrial culture today and in the past. Against the authorised, dominant and yet declinist accounts of the North East’s identity being intrinsically about heavy industry, the research seeks to valorise alternative narratives for the region.

In Bringing art to the ‘man in the back street’, Vall demonstrates that the settlement movement was an essential forerunner for the emergence of state-led cultural policy in Britain after 1945 [3.1]. The settlement movement derived from the growing concern over the condition of urban society during the late nineteenth century. The first residential settlement was established in 1884, at 'Toynbee Hall' in Whitechapel, where it was hoped that the educated middle-class men it housed would restore 'organic unity' to neighbouring working-class districts. By the 1930s six settlement houses had been established in North East England, most notably in the County Durham mining towns, but also on Tyneside and Teesside (Middlesbrough). The movements’ efforts to improve working-class culture in times of economic crises (the 1930s) produced some unexpected benefits, including an increase in community participation in art and community representation of working-class culture across the North East’s industrial conurbations. This work showed that there were significant historical precedents for later adaptations of the settlement principle in local art and culture programmes (Great Place).

Cultural Region reveals how an industrial society left the region with modest bourgeois cultural infrastructure, such as notable venues, museums and major art galleries [3.2]. However, the socio-economic legacy of deindustrialisation did not preclude engagement with culture and art. The distance from metropolitan influence allowed cultural policy to evolve in a comparatively unorthodox way. Regional cultural policy extended its reach beyond the funding and management of arts programmes allowing local protagonists to construct cultural policy that celebrated and legitimised vernacular culture to an unprecedented degree. This drew on the professionalization of a deeply rooted folk culture and the amateur world, which in turn created space for community actors and stakeholders to champion vernacular (industrial) culture and to imagine and experience the North East as a ‘cultural region’.

This research highlights the complex task faced by cultural sector organisations, such as museums, in negotiating the industrial past during deindustrialisation. The emergence of a modern regional identity yoked to widespread veneration of industry produced a challenging context for the representation of industrial heritage in museums in the North East [3.3]. The study of regional industrial museums identified two divergent approaches to the representation of North Eastern mining heritage. Firstly it showed how Beamish Museum in County Durham was conceived during the 1960s when dramatic changes to the regional industry were benignly managed. In this instance, a world was being lost but the future appeared bright and Beamish held the promise that the past could be revisited and nostalgic yearnings assuaged. In contrast, the second example was Woodhorn Colliery Museum in Northumberland which was largely assembled during the coal industry’s most conflictual decade: a period when central government was hostile to miners and their communities. The study revealed how Woodhorn museum evolved to memorialise a former industry and prompt the visitor to reflect on the sacrifices and achievements of working in a coalmine. The study’s focus on this much less profiled mining museum revealed the cultural context for the ‘end of coal’ and the local responses this elicited. It showed how the re-purposing of the museum concept gave legitimacy to new approaches and extended the parameters for the curation of industrial heritage.

Vall’s more recent work is connected to her longstanding ambition to increase understanding of industrial and post-industrial culture within North East England’s urban spaces through international comparison [3.4]. Vall’s history of Stockholm’s industrial waterfront challenges the view of recent waterfront development as being exclusively an epiphenomena of late capitalism [3.5]. Whilst the property developer’s conversion of derelict industrial land into commercial and residential properties carries much explanatory weight, the case of Stockholm demonstrates that the recent waterfront building boom drew inspiration and often followed closely the substance and the style of earlier developments. Most of these precedents were the product of Keynesian planning rather than ad hoc neoliberal capitalism. These conclusions have been pertinent to urban and regional policy makers in the North East and elsewhere where the process of reclaiming contaminated industrial land for residential and commercial reoccupation is an ongoing concern.

3. References to the research

[3.1] Vall N. 2010. Bringing Art to 'the Man in the Back Street': Regional and Historical Perspectives of Labour and the Evolution of Cultural Policy in Europe 1945–1975. Labour History Review. 75:1, 30-43. https://doi.org/10.1179/096156510X12568148663845. Selected for REF2014.

[3.2] Vall N. 2007. Regionalism and Cultural History. In Green A, Pollard A. eds. Regional identities in North East England 1300-2000. Boydell and Brewer. ISBN 1843833352. Selected for RAE2008.

[3.2] Vall N. 2011. Cultural Region. Manchester University Press. ISBN 0719082285. Selected for REF2014.

Outputs 3.1 to 3.3 led to Vall securing the below funding:

Heritage Lottery Fund. grid.507557.5. 2017-2019. OH-16-05111 RCBC. GBP69,800. Steel Stories: Curating industrial heritage in a landscape of rapid change. Partners: Teesside University and Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council.

[3.4] Vall N. 2018. Coal is our strife: representing mining heritage in North East England. Contemporary British History. 32:1, 101-120. https://doi.org/10.1080/13619462.2017.1408541. Selected for REF2021.

[3.5] Vall N. 2018. ‘A view from the wharf’: historical perspectives on the transformation of Stockholm waterfront during the twentieth century. Urban History. 45:3, 524-548. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963926817000608. Selected for REF2021.

4. Details of the impact

Through sustained regional partnerships, research on post-industrial heritage and regional culture has been used to inform a suite of regional arts and culture projects that have sought, at once, to preserve Tees Valley heritage and also foster new understandings, interpretations, and futures for the region.

Working in partnership with Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council and the SSI Task Force (established in 2015 to help those affected by the closure of the SSI steel plant), research on industrial heritage by Vall has underpinned the design and delivery of an award-winning exhibition at Kirkleatham Museum that explored Redcar’s industrial past. For the Museum Manager at Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council: ‘research on the musealisation of the industrial past served as a key thought piece in helping us to navigate the complex landscape of post-industrial change and heritage practice. Through her research we were able to place the ambitions of the exhibition in a wider context of regional museum practice, which made it easier for us to understand both the pitfalls and opportunities of curating the industrial landscape’ [5.1]. For a reviewer from Arts Council England, the collaborative nature and research-informed approach was a key to the exhibition success: ‘the project was conceived with a number of partners locally, indeed without that involvement I doubt that the project could have come to fruition as it did, that indicates rigour and commitment from a number of key players including Teesside University’ [5.2]. The positive effect of University/Museum collaboration on museum audiences has also been recognised through the exhibitions receipt of the 2019 Museums Change Lives award. For the Museum’s Association, Kirkleatham museum won the award for its ‘co-curated project Steel Stories, celebrating local iron and steel heritage. Based on in-depth research and collaboration with local community groups, the project paid homage to the people who worked in the industry and prompted debate on the future of the area’ [5.3].

The ‘Steel Stories’ exhibition at Kirkleatham Museum launched in April 2019 and ran until Dec 2019. The innovative coproduced approach led to the museum attracting over 30,000 visitors in the period. Figures for April 2019 show an increase in visitor numbers of 28% when compared to figures from 2018 [5.4]. As well as exceeding expected visitor numbers, the exhibition also brought new audiences to the museum. According to the final report: ‘it is safe to assume that Steel Stories has both engaged and resonated with local audiences, particularly retired male steelworkers. This demonstrates that the community-led consultation aspect of the exhibition has been a resounding success; respondents would not have been universally positive to the exhibition had it not paid homage to local industry, in a manner that both respects and celebrates the region’s heritage. Furthermore, raw data suggests that the exhibition is pulling in large audiences, thereby boosting the local economy for Redcar and Cleveland as well as the cultural offer of Kirkleatham Museum’ [5.4].

Qualitative feedback also reinforced that the community-engaged approach devised at the outset resonated with visitors and supported the exhibition’s ambition to increase local pride and a positive sense of belonging: 86% of visitors reported that they ‘felt pride in Teesside’s heritage after viewing the exhibition’ [5.4]. Taking place at a time of intensified deindustrialisation on Teesside following the final closure of the coke ovens and blast furnaces in Redcar in autumn 2015, the exhibition supported attendees to negotiate feelings about the past. As one visitor remarked: ‘the exhibition really showed what it’s like to live somewhere like Teesside a while ago and shows how it’s affecting our lives today in this modern age’ [5.4]. For Arts Council England: ‘featuring as it does the decline of a once proud regional manufacturing tradition creates mixed emotions, on the one hand celebrating that history and the skills on Teesside whilst at the same time looking to find a new role for the area. Though not local I felt this quite keenly –it must be all the more emotional for those who live locally or who worked in the industry’ [5.2].

Research on cultural regeneration and the ‘settlement movement’ principle has also been used to underpin a large-scale cultural programme for the Tees Valley. As a result of a series of project meetings between Vall and Tees Valley Combined Authority (TVCA) in 2016, a proposal was submitted to the Great Places Fund run by Arts Council England and National Heritage Lottery Fund. The proposal focused on five ‘settlement’ arts, heritage, and culture locations within the Tees Valley communities and the settlement principle was a key feature of the application [5.5]. For the Great Place Programme Manager at TVCA, Vall’s work ‘on regional culture and the settlement movement provided significant thought leadership for the bid’ [5.6]. Funding was secured in 2018 and the settlement principle developed by Vall provided the foundation for the delivery of the programme [5.7]. The programme evaluation shows that Great Place Tees Valley (GPTV) led to increased collaboration and partnership working across the Tees Valley, as well as the creation of training and employment opportunities for over 350 local artists and small businesses, supporting over 12,000 local people, children and families to create and enjoy cultural activities [5.8]. Perhaps more importantly, the settlement principle, and specifically the emphasis on the importance of authentic community involvement in cultural policy also ensured diverse population groups and geographies engaged with the project. Close to 50% of recorded participants live in some of the most deprived neighbourhoods in the country, running counter to national trends where engagement with arts and culture prevails in higher socio-economic groups [5.8].

Vall’s research also went on to inform the working practices of GPTV project partners. For the Managing Director of Tees Valley Arts, a charity that uses arts to create social change: ‘Vall’s research on how regional heritage can be used to reimagine a region’s future has directly informed our work. It led to the commissioning of three significant events as part of the Great Place Project that sought to actively foster and promote a positive sense of place through engagement with community groups, steelworkers, and young people, voices that have been side-lined in discussions of cultural regeneration’ [5.9].

As a result of the success of this research-informed programme, investment in culture for the Tees Valley Combined Authority has been expanded from £1.8m in 2016 to a planned investment of £20m in 2019 and a TVCA Creative Visitor Economy Recovery and Growth programme developed [5.10, 5.11]. For the TVCA programme manager for culture, Vall’s research has been central to this work: ‘The emphasis in this research on the importance of community engagement and authentic involvement as a prerequisite of effective regeneration (Vall, 2010) has informed the work done to date’ [5.6].

5. Sources to corroborate the impact

[5.1] Signed Letter (pdf). Testimonial from Museum Manager at Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council. Received 13 October 2020.

[5.2] Report (pdf). Arts Council England. Artistic and Quality Assessment Report: Steel Stories Exhibition, Kirkleatham Museum. Dated 03 April 2019.

[5.3] News Item (pdf and link). 2019. Museums Association: Museums Change Lives Awards 2019. Available at: https://www.museumsassociation.org/campaigns/museums-change-lives/museums-change-lives-awards-2019/

[5.4] Report (pdf). Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council. Tees Valley Museums. Tees Valley Combined Authority. SSI Task Force. 2019. Steel Stories - Evaluation.

[5.5] Funding application (pdf). Tees Valley Combined Authority. 2017. Heritage Lottery Fund: Second Round Application.

[5.6] Signed Letter (pdf). Testimonial from Great Place Tees Valley Programme Manager at Tees Valley Combined Authority. Received on 16 December 2020.

[5.7] Press release (pdf and link). Tees Valley Combined Authority. (no date). Great Place Tees Valley. Available at: https://teesvalley-ca.gov.uk/culture-tourism/great-place-tees-valley/

[5.8] Evaluation Summary Report (pdf and link). Tees Valley Combined Authority. Teesside University. 2020. Great Place Tees Valley: Evaluation Summary Report. Authored by Vall. Available at: https://research.tees.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/25196693/Great_Place_Tees_Valley_Evalution_Summary.pdf

[5.9] Signed Letter (pdf). Testimonial from the Executive Director at Tees Valley Arts. Received 24 March 2021.

[5.10] Report. (pdf and link). Report of Group Commercial Director Culture and Tourism. 2020. Growth Programme for the Creative and Visitor Economies. Available at: https://teesvalley-ca.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/10-Growth-Programme-for-Creative-Visitor-Economies.pdf

[5.11] Press release (pdf and link). Tees Valley Combined Authority. (no date). Visitor Economy and Culture Industries COVID-19 Recovery Programme. Available at: https://teesvalley-ca.gov.uk/culture-tourism/visitor-economy-and-culture-industries-covid-19-recovery-programme/

Showing impact case studies 1 to 4 of 4

Filter by higher education institution

UK regions
Select one or more of the following higher education institutions and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No higher education institutions found.
Institutions

Filter by unit of assessment

Main panels
Select one or more of the following units of assessment and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No unit of assessments found.
Units of assessment

Filter by continued case study

Select one or more of the following states and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.

Filter by summary impact type

Select one or more of the following summary impact types and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.

Filter by impact UK location

UK Countries
Select one or more of the following UK locations and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No UK locations found.
Impact UK locations

Filter by impact global location

Continents
Select one or more of the following global locations and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No global locations found.
Impact global locations

Filter by underpinning research subject

Subject areas
Select one or more of the following underpinning research subjects and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No subjects found.
Underpinning research subjects