Skip to main

Impact case study database

The impact case study database allows you to browse and search for impact case studies submitted to the REF 2021. Use the search and filters below to find the impact case studies you are looking for.

Search and filter

Filter by

  • The University of Liverpool
   None selected
  • 7 - Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences
   None selected
   None selected
   None selected
   None selected
   None selected
   None selected
Waiting for server
Download currently selected sections for currently selected case studies (spreadsheet) (generating)
Download currently selected case study PDFs (zip) (generating)
Download tags for the currently selected case studies (spreadsheet) (generating)
Currently displaying text from case study section
Showing impact case studies 1 to 2 of 2
Submitting institution
The University of Liverpool
Unit of assessment
7 - Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences
Summary impact type
Technological
Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
No

1. Summary of the impact

Research at Liverpool into the use of seismic data to predict the effects of damaging earthquakes has improved accuracy, and led to a reduction in uncertainty, of seismic hazard assessments. This research has influenced public policy and improved engineering and industrial design across Europe, creating positive impacts for public safety and the environment, including having:

  • shaped UK Government policy on the use of hydraulic fracturing (fracking) for hydrocarbons at Preston New Road, Lancashire, leading to a moratorium on fracking across England

  • developed safety-linked decision-making for gas production in the Netherlands

  • improved engineering seismic-design for the UK’s nuclear industry

  • assessed seismic risk to buildings in Basel, Switzerland and aided risk mitigation measures to be targeted toward at-risk school buildings

2. Underpinning research

Research at the University of Liverpool into the use of local (micro-)earthquake data to predict the effects of damaging earthquakes delivers an increase in the accuracy and reduction in uncertainty of seismic hazard assessment. The research that underpins this case study has been undertaken between 2004 and 2020 by Dr Edwards [ 3.1-3.6] and Prof Rietbrock [ 3.1, 3.2].

When considering the seismic design of safety critical or economically-sensitive structures, engineers face a safety linked cost-benefit problem. Seismic design processes are heavily regulated and utilise a diverse range of predictive models, which, to ensure robust results, are invariably based on non-local, often global, datasets. The assumption is that earthquake effects in similar geological settings are considered universal, but with high variability. As a result, the assessment of earthquake hazard and risk in data-poor areas, such as central and northern Europe, has, until recently, been subject to high uncertainty and bias.

The scientific and engineering community now realises that understanding the small-scale (km or less) variability and ‘regionalisation’ of earthquake ground-shaking is critical. This is particularly important if we are to reduce the large uncertainties, and therefore costs, associated with predicting and mitigating low probability (rare), high-consequence earthquake hazards. A physical modelling methodology developed through research at Liverpool moves away from high uncertainty ‘one case fits all’ approaches using data from around the world, towards physical models based on local data, with reduced uncertainties.

The fundamental underpinning research focusses on the use of monitored seismicity (typically small magnitude, or micro-, earthquakes) in the region of interest to develop physical seismological models [ 3.1] and, subsequently, facilitates the site-specific prediction of earthquake shaking for large hazardous events [ 3.2, 3.3]. Initial research was undertaken at Liverpool (2004 - 2008) [ 3.1] and has been later applied to develop national seismic hazard maps for Switzerland [e.g. 3.4] and probabilistic seismic hazard analyses for five Swiss nuclear power stations operated by swissnuclear. The work was diversified through application to a geothermal energy project in St Gallen, city-scale local hazard zonation [ 3.5], induced seismicity related to conventional hydrocarbon extraction in the Netherlands [ 3.3] and, most recently, hydraulic fracturing (fracking) in the UK, as part of a consultancy project for the regulator [ 3.6].

The underpinning research has led to the application of the developed methodologies in several large scale (£multi-million) engineering or civil-protection projects for nationally critical infrastructure across Europe, including:

  1. Pegasos Refinement Project (seismic hazard assessment of five Swiss nuclear power stations) (2008 - 2015)

  2. Swiss national seismic hazard model and building codes (2013 - 2016) [ 3.4]

  3. Seismic hazard and risk model for the Groningen gas field, Netherlands (2013 - 2020) [ 3.3]

  4. Seismic hazard assessment of three new-build UK nuclear power station sites (2015 - 2016) [ 3.1, 3.2]

  5. Seismic hazard assessment of Spanish nuclear power station sites (2017 - 2019)

  6. Seismic hazard and risk for 121 school buildings in Basel, Switzerland (2016 - 2018) [ 3.5]

  7. Seismic hazard and risk for population centres around the Preston New Road, Lancashire, shale gas (fracking) site (2018 - 2020) [ 3.6]

3. References to the research

3.1. Edwards, B., A. Rietbrock, J. J. Bommer, and B. Baptie (2008). The acquisition of source, path, and site effects from microearthquake recordings using Q tomography: Application to the United Kingdom, B Seismol Soc Am 98, doi: 10.1785/0120070127

3.2. Rietbrock, A., F. Strasser, and B. Edwards (2013). A stochastic earthquake ground‐motion prediction model for the United Kingdom. B Seismol Soc Am 103, doi: 10.1785/0120110231.

3.3. Bommer, J. J., B. Dost, B. Edwards, P. J. Stafford, J. van Elk, D. Doornhof, and M. Ntinalexis (2016). Developing an application-specific ground-motion model for induced seismicity, B Seismol Soc Am 106, doi: 10.1785/0120150184

3.4. Edwards, B., C. Cauzzi, L. Danciu, and D. Fäh (2016). Region-specific Assessment, Adjustment and Weighting of Ground Motion Prediction Models: application to the 2015 Swiss Seismic Hazard Maps, B Seismol Soc Am 106, doi: 10.1785/0120150367

3.5. Michel, C., D. Fäh, B. Edwards, and C. Cauzzi (2017). Site amplification at the city scale in Basel (Switzerland) from geophysical site characterization and spectral modelling of recorded earthquakes, Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C 98 27-40, doi: 10.1016/j.pce.2016.07.005

3.6. Edwards, B., H. Crowley and R. Pinho (2019). Final Report on: “WP2 – Impacts of Seismicity: Transmission to People, Property and Well Integrity”. A Technical Report commissioned by the Oil and Gas Authority (OGA). 115 pp. Online: https://web.archive.org/web/20191102070745/https://www.ogauthority.co.uk/media/6127/final-reports-wp2-2.pdf

4. Details of the impact

The University of Liverpool’s earthquake hazard research has influenced public policy in the UK and improved engineering and industrial design across Europe. Impacts include:

1. shaping of UK Government policy on the use of hydraulic fracturing for hydrocarbons at Preston New Road, Lancashire, leading to a moratorium on fracking across England

2. developing improved safety-linked decision-making for gas production in the Netherlands

3. improving engineering seismic-design for the UK’s nuclear industry for increased safety

4. assessing seismic risk to school buildings in Basel, Switzerland, which aided mitigation measures to be targeted for increased public safety

4.1 Shaped UK Government policy on fracking at Preston New Road and across England

Between 2019 and 2020, Liverpool’s research [ 3.6] has been used by the Oil and Gas Authority (OGA), the UK regulator, and the UK’s Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) to change public policy and guidance related to induced earthquakes due to hydraulic fracturing (fracking) at Preston New Road, Lancashire. As part of an OGA-led review led by Dr Edwards and reported to BEIS, Liverpool undertook a study into the risk due to seismic activity at Preston New Road, as summarised by the OGA [ 5.1].

Liverpool’s work concluded that an unlikely future scenario of a magnitude 4.5 event (2.9 was largest to date) would lead to widespread building damage that could also be a serious risk to public safety; from cracked plasterwork affecting 10% of buildings, to more serious structural damage of varying degrees affecting 5.4% of buildings, with 5.4% also likely to suffer chimney failure. Minister for Energy and Clean Growth, Claire Perry MP, cited Liverpool’s research within a BEIS topical questions debate with fellow MPs in the House of Commons in January 2019, stating [ 5.2]: “ we have had some great evidence from the University of Liverpool” in response to a question from the MP for Sheffield South East about the impact of fracking in Lancashire.

As a direct result of Liverpool research, fracking was ultimately suspended across England in late 2019 by the UK Government, with the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS), Andrea Leadsom MP, stating [ 5.3]: “… I’ve also always been clear that shale gas exploration must be carried out safely. In the UK, we have been led by the best available scientific evidence, and closely regulated by the Oil and Gas Authority, one of the best regulators in the world. After reviewing the OGA’s report [ 5.1] [summarising Dr Edwards team’s research] *into recent seismic activity at Preston New Road, it is clear that we cannot rule out future unacceptable impacts on the local community. For this reason, I have concluded that we should put a moratorium on fracking in England with immediate effect.*”

4.2 Developed improved safety-linked decision-making for gas production in the Netherlands

An ongoing review (2015 and 2020) of induced seismicity in the Groningen Gas Field, the Netherlands, has led to the development of seven sequential hazard and risk models, all utilising Liverpool’s research into local seismic hazard [ 3.3]. These models have been submitted by the operator to the Dutch regulator and used as the basis for decisions on production levels, maximising economic benefits (profit and tax revenue), while ensuring safe continued operation.

To understand and mitigate the effects of earthquakes induced due to gas-field compaction, a probabilistic seismic and risk analysis in the Groningen Gas Field was commissioned by the gas field operator Nederlandse Aardolie Maatschappij BV (NAM) in 2013. The Groningen gas field is the largest natural gas field in Europe and makes a significant contribution toward the Dutch economy. The “ total value of gas sales from 1963 to 2019 is some 417 bln Euro” [ 5.4]. This generates substantial tax revenues: “Since production started in 1963 to 2019 the tax income from the Groningen field for the Dutch state was some 360 bln Euro” [ 5.4]. However, due to increasing induced seismicity, since 2014 the Dutch government decided to impose annual cuts in production output, leading to a planned closure of the gas field in 2022, with projected losses in tax revenue amounting to billions of Euros.

Liverpool’s research into site-specific earthquake ground motion [e.g. 3.1, 3.3, 3.4] has provided the basis for (gas) output dependent risk calculations in Groningen, as detailed by the Earthquake Advisor to NAM: “ Regional, never-mind global models, as typically used in large-scale engineering projects were not fit for purpose” [ 5.4]. It was therefore imperative “ to avoid the use ‘typical’ industry-standard approaches such as the use of global empirical models and instead to develop a site-specific physics- based ground motion model” [ 5.4]. “ Work undertaken by the NAM Ground motion characterisation team, comprising internationally leading experts, including Dr Edwards (University of Liverpool), has led to the development of a state-of-the art model for earthquake ground motion” [ 5.4]. The work has enabled the operator to define production levels that reduce the incidence of earthquakes and maintain risk exposure at a level acceptable to the regulator.

Liverpool’s work has been extensively used for operational planning (by the operator), assessment of safe production levels (by the regulator, SodM, and Ministry of Economic Affairs [ 5.5]), assessment of the safety of buildings for chemical production [ 5.6], engineering design of the commercial ‘Groninger Forum’, risk assessment of levees/dams and an update of building design criteria. The wider impact of this work is highlighted by the Earthquake lead of NAM, who noted that “ due to the importance for the Dutch economy the studies are followed closely by the media in The Netherlands and are discussed regularly in the Dutch Parliament” [ 5.4].

4.3 Improved engineering seismic-design for UK’s nuclear industry for increased safety

Liverpool’s research has provided regulatory compliance for existing and new-build nuclear sites across Europe and has been successfully used in the development of nuclear power station design [ 3.1, 3.2]. The Horizon Nuclear Power project (2008 - 2019), which developed the design earthquake criteria for the £15 bn new-build nuclear power station at the Wylfa Newydd site in Wales, used a novel approach that has not been used previously in the UK [ 5.7a]. As part of this, Liverpool’s research was used to develop a site-specific ground motion model which allowed the reduction in uncertainties and subsequently a reduction in conservatism.

As a result of Liverpool’s research, the contractor ARUP could utilise an approach that defines the earthquake criteria to ensure a consistent risk for all elements of the nuclear facility, and for which they were shortlisted for the Ground Engineering Awards 2020 [ 5.7a]. Taking advantage of Liverpool’s research, the criteria ensures a design “ with lower … uncertainty, ultimately reducing design costs, but ensuring safety and operational performance during earthquakes” according to the Associate Director of ARUP [ 5.7a]. A journal article [ 5.7b] written by the ARUP project team noted that “ the site-specific stochastic model [ 3.2, and updates thereof] was the preferred model from those included on the logic tree as it has been developed specifically for the Wylfa Newydd site, utilizing ground motion data recorded throughout the UK as well as at the WPS station adjacent to Wylfa Newydd.” More realistic seismic criteria that ensured an appropriate level of resilience and safety was therefore achieved, whilst ensuring unnecessary conservatism was removed and financial costs were minimised.

4.4 Assessed seismic risk to school buildings in Basel, Switzerland and aided mitigation measures to be targeted for increased public safety

Liverpool’s research [ 3.4, 3.5] has also provided improved seismic hazard assessment in Switzerland, highlighting the potential threat to school buildings in Basel [ 5.8]. To apply research into local seismic hazard assessments, a methodology was developed by Liverpool, alongside partners at ETH Zurich, for determining local-scale earthquake effects across a city-region [ 3.5].

The Head of Earthquake Hazard and Risk at the Swiss Seismological Service [ 5.9], notes that the “ research has allowed us to reduce uncertainty in probabilistic seismic hazard on a national scale – and consequently more accurate and reliable national seismic building codes, which ensure occupants safety during earthquakes. It has further facilitated the development of products aimed at improving disaster response that allow to direct help and resources immediately following an earthquake. At the smallest scale, school building stock in Basel has directly benefitted from this research, allowing the prioritisation of seismic retrofitting to vulnerable buildings and ensuring the safety of school children.”

An evaluation of the approach based on Liverpool research [ 5.8] was performed by ETH Zurich and the Swiss Seismological Service as part of a risk assessment into all school buildings in the city of Basel, funded by the Cantonal Emergency Organisation (KKO) of the Canton Basel-Stadt (the city Region of Basel). The study was published in technical reports and a journal article [ 5.8] in 2017. It was found that if there were a similar earthquake to the historical event that occurred in 1356, of 121 school buildings in Basel, 102 would be unusable, with 35 partially collapsing and 12 fully collapsing. Of 16,960 pupils in Basel, their estimates expected 305 fatalities and 1,814 injured. Total potential economic losses were assessed at 566 million Swiss Francs [ 5.8].

The study was subsequently used to identify school buildings that needed to be prioritised for seismic retrofitting measures [ 5.7]. This city-wide assessment of risk was supported through the Swiss Federal Nuclear Safety Inspectorate and by the Swiss Federal Offices for the Environment, Roads, and Railways, the Swiss Earthquake Insurance Pool, and ETH Zurich. The method based on Liverpool’s research has further been implemented in the real-time monitoring of the Swiss Seismological observatory, facilitating the rapid identification of at-risk areas such that mitigating measures can be implemented [ 5.9, 5.10].

5. Sources to corroborate the impact

5.1. Interim report of the scientific analysis of data gathered from Cuadrilla’s operations at Preston New Road by the Oil and Gas Authority, as provided to the Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, supporting the impact of Liverpool research on the UK Government’s decision to place a moratorium on fracking in England.

5.2. Response of Ms Perry, Minister of State at the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy to Mr Clive Betts (MP Sheffield South East), supporting the impact of Liverpool research on the impacts of hydraulic fracturing: https://hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/2019-01-08/debates/1F579CC8-CD80-49E2-B0EF-A3B3B8FB9868/OralAnswersToQuestions#contribution-1F9ED73C-51B4-42F1-9366-36AA3CA02DA1 [Accessed 7 December 2020].

5.3. UK Government press release entitled ‘government ends support for fracking’ published 2 November 2019, supporting the impact of Liverpool research on the moratorium on fracking: https://web.archive.org/web/20201112002407/https://www.gov.uk/government/news/government-ends-support-for-fracking [Accessed 7 December 2020].

5.4. Testimonial from the Groningen Earthquake Advisor for Nederlandse Aardolie Maatschappij (NAM, who supply 75% of the natural gas required by Dutch households and businesses), supporting the impact of Liverpool research on improved safety-linked decision-making for gas production in the Groningen Gas Field, Netherlands.

5.5. Report on Seismic Hazard Assessment of Production Scenarios in Groningen, prepared for the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs and Climate Policy by the Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute, supporting the impact of Liverpool research on region-specific seismic hazard due to induced seismicity in the Groningen Gas Field. Here, models developed using Liverpool research are used for production scenario hazard estimates to inform the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Climate Policy.

5.6. Parliamentary report [ in Dutch and English] of the workgroup on earthquake load for industry entitled, ‘Towards a quick, simple, transparent and robust test on the earthquake resistance of the chemical industry in Groningen’, citing various works supported by research at Liverpool, and thereby supporting the impact of Liverpool research on site-specific seismic hazard due to induced seismicity in the Groningen Gas Field.

5.7 Evidence relating to the impact on improved engineering seismic-design for nuclear industry:

5.7a. Testimonial from the Associate Director of ARUP and Associate of ARUP, supporting the impact of Liverpool research on improving engineering seismic-design for the UK’s nuclear industry for increased safety.

5.7b. Journal paper entitled ‘A probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for Wylfa Newydd, a new nuclear site in the United Kingdom’ by the ARUP project team. DOI: 10.1007/s10518-020-00862-8

5.8. Journal paper on ‘loss scenarios for school buildings in Basel (Switzerland)’ by Clotaire Michel and Donat Fäh (Swiss Seismological Service), Pia Hannewald and Pierino Lestuzzi (Résonance Ingénieurs-Conseils), and Stephan Husen (State Laboratory, Basel City), supporting the impact of Liverpool research on local amplification effects and their relation to seismic risk. DOI: 10.1007/s10518-016-0025-2

5.9. Testimonial from Head of the Earthquake Hazard & Risk Assessment Section

at the Swiss Seismological Service, supporting the impact of Liverpool research on region-specific seismic hazard and risk assessment in various applications across Switzerland.

5.10. Publication [ in German] on ‘Earthquakes: Maps of subsoil classes, creation and use’. Published by the Swiss Federal Office for the Environment (used to inform ‘best-practice’ for earthquake engineering design), supporting the impact of Liverpool research on regionalised seismic hazard. Input hazard in the report (Fig 3.) is defined on models developed [ 3.4, 5.9].

Submitting institution
The University of Liverpool
Unit of assessment
7 - Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences
Summary impact type
Technological
Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
No

1. Summary of the impact

Frontier research at the University of Liverpool has informed the implementation of operational volcano monitoring systems in Guatemala by developing techniques and practices that utilise seismic and acoustic data for real-time assessment of volcanic activity. In 2018, the adoption of these new methods by INSIVUMEH, the governmental agency responsible for monitoring of geological hazards in Guatemala, changed volcano monitoring practice and influenced decision making for the management of hazard areas near active volcanoes in the country. On 19 November 2018, the timely detection of intensifying activity by the new monitoring systems informed an evacuation, and protected 3,925 people whose lives were under threat by eruptive activity at Volcan de Fuego in Guatemala.

2. Underpinning research

World-class research in volcanology has been conducted in the School of Environmental Sciences at Liverpool under the leadership of Dr. Silvio De Angelis (Reader in Geophysics) and Prof. Yan Lavallée (Professor and Chair of Volcanology and Magmatic Processes). Their research focusses on characterizing the geophysical fingerprint of volcanoes to inform and develop operational frameworks for real-time volcano monitoring.

Liverpool research into volcano geophysics conducted between 2014 and 2020 has focussed on Official Development Assistance (ODA) countries, particularly Guatemala. In these countries volcanic activity has significant and long-lasting economic and societal impacts through the severe disruption to the lives and livelihoods of individuals. Communities in ODA countries are disproportionally vulnerable to volcanic hazards, as a high percentage live in potentially affected areas; scarce access to monitoring infrastructure, a lack of local know-how to implement solutions to the challenges posed by volcanic disasters and extreme poverty are aggravating factors. Understanding and managing the threat of volcanic activity is key to the economic development and welfare of these countries. De Angelis’ and Lavallée’s research was supported by grants from the academic, government, and private sectors. Relevant to this impact, those include funders such as the European Research Council , Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) , Society of Exploration Geophysics and the Foreign and Commonwealth Office UK (FCO).

Research published by the team led by De Angelis and Lavallée has provided new and robust frameworks for the interpretation of quantitative field observations and geophysical data monitored during volcanic unrest and eruption [3.1, 3.2, 3.3]. At Santiaguito volcano, in Guatemala, the occurrence and causes of volcanic unrest were investigated to demonstrate links between volcanic processes, and the timing of changes in eruption intensity [3.1] as observed in seismic and acoustic (infrasound) data [3.2, 3.3]. This body of work established methodologies to characterize the state of unrest at volcanoes such as in Guatemala, where eruptions last for periods as long as decades. Long-lived eruptions can undergo sudden and hazardous transitions, from nearly continuous, low-level eruptions to sudden and vigorous peaks in activity. These shifts can occur without clear long- or short-term precursors in the traditionally monitored geophysical signals such as seismic or ground deformation.

Liverpool’s work at Santiaguito and other volcanoes [3.2, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6] highlighted the value and potential of infrasound data as a powerful diagnostic for volcanic unrest and as a real-time monitoring tool during volcanic crises. Work published in 2019-2020, led by De Angelis, focussed on investigating the mechanisms of infrasound generation and propagation at active volcanoes [3.4, 3.5], and successfully explored the use of acoustic data for real-time monitoring of eruptive activity [3.6]. The team demonstrated that infrasound holds potential to inform early warning over periods of hours to minutes before the onset of the peak phase of activity at volcanoes [3.6].

De Angelis introduced new numerical schemes for acoustic wavefield modelling, and novel waveform inversion methods for infrasound data [3.4, 3.5] akin to methods employed in seismology to characterize the source mechanisms of earthquakes. Numerical modelling of the infrasonic wavefield, including the effects of terrain topography and atmospheric effects, provides a valuable tool for planning the deployment of acoustic sensor networks [3.5, 3.6]; infrasound data inversion allows evaluation of the source mechanisms of explosions and assessment of the magnitude of volcanic activity in terms of the rate at which gas and pyroclasts are ejected from erupting vents [3.5, 3.6]. These are key input parameters into models of atmospheric dispersal of volcanic material as used by aviation authorities to dispatch warnings during eruptions [3.4]. Work published by De Angelis in 2020 introduced new algorithms and their open source software implementation for analysis of infrasound array data [3.6]. These algorithms allow detection, quantification and tracking of the evolution of volcanic unrest in real-time, including the associated uncertainties. This work demonstrated that the deployment of microphones in small clusters is an efficient, robust and cost-effective solution to provide information that can be readily exploited to inform volcano surveillance operations and early warning protocols.

3. References to the research

3.1 Wallace, P. A., Lamb, O. D., De Angelis, S., Kendrick, J. E., Hornby, A. J., Díaz-Moreno, A., González, P. J., von Aulock, F. W., Lamur, A., Utley, J. E. P., Rietbrock, A., Chigna, G., and Lavallée, Y. (2020). Integrated constraints on explosive eruption intensification at Santiaguito dome complex, Guatemala. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 536, doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2020.116139.

3.2 Lamb, O. D., Lamur, A., Diaz-Moreno, A., De Angelis, S., Hornby, A. J., von Aulock, F. W., and Lavallee, Y. (2019). Disruption of Long-Term Effusive-Explosive Activity at Santiaguito, Guatemala. Frontiers in Earth Science, 6, doi:10.3389/feart.2018.00253

3.3 De Angelis, S., Lamb, O. D., Lamur, A., Hornby, A. J., von Aulock, F. W., Chigna, G., and Rietbrock, A. (2016). Characterization of moderate ash-and-gas explosions at Santiaguito volcano, Guatemala, from infrasound waveform inversion and thermal infrared measurements. Geophysical Research Letters, 43(12), doi:10.1002/2016GL069098

3.4 De Angelis, S., Diaz-Moreno, A., and Zuccarello, L. (2019). Recent Developments and Applications of Acoustic Infrasound to Monitor Volcanic Emissions. Remote sensing, 11(11), doi:10.3390/rs11111302

3.5 Diaz-Moreno, A., Iezzi, A. M., Lamb, O. D., Fee, D., Kim, K., Zuccarello, L., and De Angelis, S. (2019). Volume Flow Rate Estimation for Small Explosions at Mt. Etna, Italy, from acoustic waveform inversion. Geophysical Research Letters, 46(20), doi:10.1029/2019GL084598

3.6 De Angelis, S., Haney, M., Lyons, J. J., Wech, A., Fee, D., Diaz-Moreno, A., and Zuccarello, L. (2020). Uncertainty in Detection of Volcanic Activity Using Infrasound Arrays: Examples From Mt. Etna, Italy. Frontiers in Earth Sciences, 8, doi: 10.3389/feart.2020.00169

4. Details of the impact

Research at Liverpool has informed the implementation of operational volcano monitoring systems in Guatemala by developing techniques for the real-time assessment of volcanic activity. The adoption of these new methods by INSIVUMEH in 2018 has:

  • changed volcano monitoring practice in Guatemala

  • influenced decision making for management of hazard areas near active volcanoes in Guatemala

  • detected intensifying activity at Volcan de Fuego in November 2018 which informed an evacuation, and protected 3,925 people whose lives were at risk from eruptive activity

4.1 Volcano monitoring and local capacity building in Guatemala

In 2014 Liverpool researchers recognized that risk mitigation in Guatemala required a long-term commitment. Funding from European Research Council, Natural Environment Research Council, and Society of Exploration Geophysics initiated a collaboration with INSIVUMEH to improve monitoring of Santa Maria-Santaguito. De Angelis and Lavallée designed a program centred on four elements:

  1. research at Guatemalan volcanoes, in particular Santiaguito and Fuego

  2. technical support in the implementation of a volcano monitoring system based on seismic and infrasound data

  3. advisory roles to assist with the development of a volcano monitoring programme

  4. training of local scientific and technical staff in Guatemala

The U.S. Geological Survey Volcano Disaster Assistance Program (VDAP) confirmed that “one critical role of Dr. De Angelis is his ability to provide Guatemalan scientists with educational opportunities … that cannot be offered by a governmental organization” [5.2], that ”the primary focus of his work has been to increase the understanding of volcanoes and volcanic unrest” [5.2], and that Dr De Angelis ”has carried out his studies with a strong, consistent emphasis on simultaneously improving the capabilities of our Guatemalan colleagues” [5.2].

Long-term sustainability was at the core of the Liverpool-INSIVUMEH cooperation from its inception, as evidenced by the INSIVUMEH Director General, “Local capacity building in Guatemala is a central objective of […] INSIVUMEH; in this respect the role played by Dr. De Angelis has been central” [5.1a]. In January 2016, Lavallée co-led a ten-day workshop to train local staff and academics on monitoring instrument deployment and data analysis, specific to Guatemalan volcanoes [5.1b].

4.2 Responding to an eruption of Volcan de Fuego with technical advice and support

On June 3, 2018, an eruption of Volcan de Fuego “ killed 110 people, and 332 remain missing to date. Over 10,000 had to be relocated, and about 3,600 permanently lost their homes” [5.3]. Almost overnight Guatemala became dependent on outside expertise, requiring technical advice and support [5.4]. The Liverpool team led by De Angelis was the first in the country after the June 2018 eruption. The UK’s Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) provided funds “to install seismic and acoustic monitoring equipment and to implement some of their recent research into a real-time system for automatic detection of volcanic activity” [5.3]. According to the Director General of the European Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations (ECHO), De Angelis was “instrumental in the assessment of the situation on the ground in the aftermath of the eruption” [5.5].

The Guatemalan government’s Coordinadora Nacional para la Reducción de Desastres (CONRED) issued a request for assistance [5.4] to ECHO through its Emergency Response Coordination Centre (ERCC), and a team of experts was deployed to Guatemala. De Angelis’ name was “put forward for the ERCC mission by the UK Civil Contingencies Secretariat (Cabinet Office) based on his extensive body of research and work” [5.5]. He joined the ERCC mission on July 3, 2018 [5.5]. The mission concluded on 13 July having implemented a preliminary real-time monitoring system “directly derived from research published by Dr. De Angelis and colleagues” [5.5].

4.3 Developing a real-time volcanic monitoring system in Guatemala

De Angelis later returned to assist VDAP colleagues with the installation of additional equipment, which became the core of what is now an increasingly developing volcano monitoring program in Guatemala [5.1a, 5.2]. A framework for the analysis of acoustic data later published by De Angelis [3.6] had been implemented at INSIVUMEH as early as September 2018 to provide “for the first time a system … capable of detecting and alarming on volcanic explosions, pyroclastic flows and lahars at Fuego” **[5.1a]. ** In 2019 a Volcanic Scientific Advisory Committee (VSAC) was established to advise INSIVUMEH on volcanic risk assessment and strategic planning for volcano monitoring in Guatemala. Based on his world-class track record, De Angelis was nominated as a member of the Volcanic Scientific Advisory Committee [5.7].

In 2019, the Head of Volcanology at INSIVUMEH visited Liverpool to work on the implementation of new volcano monitoring tools through funding from the Society of Exploration Geophysics. De Angelis and INSIVUMEH developed additional software for the real-time calculation of monitoring parameters based on research published in [3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6]. According to the Director General of INSIVUMEH, the “new workflow at INSIVUMEH is based on research by Dr. De Angelis and colleagues, including improved processing to detect and track volcanic activity, assessment of explosion magnitude and evaluation of the volume of ash injected in the atmosphere during volcanic explosions” [5.1a]. In January 2020, De Angelis organized a workshop in Guatemala funded by the UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office to train 25 members of INSIVUMEH staff and civil protection officials on the new monitoring tools [5.1a, 5.2, 5.3].

4.4 Changing practice, influencing policy and saving lives in Guatemala

To date, the new volcano monitoring systems at INSIVUMEH have detected over 30,000 events, including volcanic explosions, lahars, and pyroclastic flows at Fuego. The work of the Liverpool team between 2014 and 2020 has significantly contributed to transforming volcano monitoring capacity in Guatemala [5.1a, 5.2, 5.3]. Liverpool research provided new tools for timely detection of eruptive activity, which have already influenced early warning practice and civil protection response during volcanic crises in Guatemala [5.1a, 5.5, 5.6, 5.7].

During the last episode of intensification of volcanic activity at Fuego, in November 2018, the new monitoring systems at INSIVUMEH, based on Liverpool research, detected an early escalation in eruptive activity. This information was instrumental for INSIVUMEH to advise the Guatemalan national civil protection authorities and to jointly recommend the evacuation of 3,925 people, whose life was under threat from the ongoing eruption [5.6].

The significance and reach of this impact is reinforced by the high levels of volcanic hazards across Guatemala, with 1,341,000 people living within 10 km of one of three active volcanoes. The 1902 eruption of Santa Maria claimed the lives of about 8,700 people and “ activity at Fuego could potentially affect an area populated by nearly 1,000,000 people, which includes rural areas where poverty frequently represents an aggravating factor[5.1a].

4.5 Improving volcano monitoring practice in Italy, Ecuador and New Zealand

In the future, new monitoring systems similar to those implemented at INSIVUMEH will provide surveillance at other volcanoes instrumented with similar equipment. Liverpool has already instrumented the Santa Maria volcanic complex with a network of sensors integrated within the new systems and volcano monitoring protocols through funding from the Society of Exploration Geophysics. Based on the impact of the work in Guatemala and a successful track record, the Liverpool research team received invitations in 2020 from the Instituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Italy to work on monitoring Mount Etna [5.8], the Instituto Geofisico, Ecuador [5.9], and the Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences, New Zealand [5.10] to collaborate on the development of infrasound monitoring systems. This is a powerful testament to the significant impact and international reputation of research in volcanology and geophysics at Liverpool.

5. Sources to corroborate the impact

5.1a Director of INSIVUMEH . Factual Statement that describes contributions to developing new monitoring systems at INSIVUMEH based on Liverpool research, and confirms advisory roles undertaken by De Angelis during and after the 2018 eruption of Fuego volcano.

5.1b Professor of Geophysics at Boise State University (USA) and the leader of the first Workshop on Volcanoes (WoV). Factual statement that describes the efforts of Lavallée and his team at Liverpool, towards volcano monitoring strategies and shared best practices during WoV2016.

5.2 Geophysicist, U.S. Geological Survey Volcano Disaster Assistance Program (VDAP). Factual statement that describes the quality of training delivered by Liverpool and the collaboration with US Geological Survey in developing a volcanic monitoring system in Guatemala.

5.3 Her Majesty’s Ambassador to the Republic of Guatemala. Factual statement describing work of De Angelis as part of a rapid response team in the aftermath of eruption and role in initiating building a modern monitoring system in Guatemala.

5.4 Coordinadora Nacional para la Reducción de Desastres, Guatemala. In Spanish. Request for assistance to the Directorate General for European Civil Protection for qualified experts to help develop rapid response and monitoring systems in Guatemala and to advise on risk and hazard.

5.5 Acting Team Leader (Unit 2) at the Directorate General for European Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations (DG ECHO). Leader of the EU-ECHO mission in Guatemala in the aftermath of the June 2018 eruption of Volcan de Fuego. Factual statement confirming the advisory role undertaken by De Angelis during the EU-ECHO eruption response mission.

5.6 Coordinadora Nacional para la Reducción de Desastres, Guatemala. In Spanish. Informative Bulletin from 19 November 2019 confirming the evacuation of residents in Guatemala: https://web.archive.org/web/20201119163459/https://conred.gob.gt/boletin-informativo-no-3992018-actividad-de-volcan-de-fuego-continua-generando-flujos-piroclasticos/ [Accessed 01/12/2020]

5.7 Director of INSIVUMEH . Letter of invitation to join the Volcanic Scientific Advisory Committee to establish volcano monitoring systems in Guatemala in the future.

5.8 Coordinator of Seismological Research and Monitoring, Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Catania, Italy. Letter of invitation to collaborate towards development of volcano infrasound monitoring systems in Italy.

5.9 Director of Instituto Geofisico, Ecuador. Letter of invitation to collaborate towards development of volcano infrasound monitoring systems in Ecuador.

5.10 Science Operations and Data Team lead, GNS Science, New Zealand. Letter of invitation to collaborate towards development of volcano infrasound monitoring systems in New Zealand.

Showing impact case studies 1 to 2 of 2

Filter by higher education institution

UK regions
Select one or more of the following higher education institutions and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No higher education institutions found.
Institutions

Filter by unit of assessment

Main panels
Select one or more of the following units of assessment and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No unit of assessments found.
Units of assessment

Filter by continued case study

Select one or more of the following states and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.

Filter by summary impact type

Select one or more of the following summary impact types and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.

Filter by impact UK location

UK Countries
Select one or more of the following UK locations and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No UK locations found.
Impact UK locations

Filter by impact global location

Continents
Select one or more of the following global locations and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No global locations found.
Impact global locations

Filter by underpinning research subject

Subject areas
Select one or more of the following underpinning research subjects and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No subjects found.
Underpinning research subjects