Impact case study database
Search and filter
Filter by
- The University of Manchester
- 33 - Music, Drama, Dance, Performing Arts, Film and Screen Studies
- Submitting institution
- The University of Manchester
- Unit of assessment
- 33 - Music, Drama, Dance, Performing Arts, Film and Screen Studies : A - Drama, Dance, Performing Arts, Film and Screen Studies
- Summary impact type
- Societal
- Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
- Yes
1. Summary of the impact
In Place of War (IPOW) is an international arts organisation emerging from research at The University of Manchester (UoM) that investigated arts practices in places of war and conflict. Building from the model established in the original research project, IPOW trains artists, supports the infrastructures that sustain their work, and provides an international platform to showcase their art. From the provision of equipment, creative spaces and the means to maintain professional networks, to the training of young artists in Creative Entrepreneurial programmes, IPOW now pioneers responsive impact, bringing benefit to thousands of artists and other individuals. Impact highlights include: the bringing together of an all women ‘super-group’; providing USD300,000 of music equipment to transform music venues across the West Bank; mobilising over 1,000 artists from 25 countries though collaborations and performances; and training more than 600 participants and 200 trainers in Creative Entrepreneurial programmes in 18 countries.
2. Underpinning research
The impact is based on a model developed from research carried out between 2004 and 2008, initially as part of an AHRC-funded project [Grant 1, see section 3], then through further Leverhulme Trust-funded Network projects (2008-2011) [G2], an AHRC research leave grant (2008) [G3], and an AHRC follow-on grant (2012-2013) [G4]. These projects collectively led to the establishment of In Place of War as an NGO (explained below) and Thompson’s role in UoM’s Humanitarian and Conflict Response Institute, where he was both founder and Director 2012-2013.
Inspired by Thompson’s original UNICEF-funded work from the early 2000s in the north and east of Sri Lanka during the military conflict, the primary objective of the research across these funded projects was to create a long-term enquiry into the relationship between performance and war. This objective was carried out through documentation and analysis of contemporary examples of artists working in sites of armed conflict. The research was predicated on the identified need to set up and maintain meaningful and sustained partnerships with artists and their communities, and to facilitate networks and knowledge flows between artists from different places of war. The research aimed to empower artists to share practice and experience of the precarious contexts in which their work is made, with the researcher positioned as a collaborative facilitator rather than the owner and primary distributor of knowledge.
The first phase of the project (AHRC grant, 2004-2008) [G1] involved the identification of over 300 theatre and arts organisations in warzones – in, for example, Sri Lanka, the Occupied Palestinian Territories, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Kosovo and Northern Ireland – as well as refugee arts projects in the UK. It constructed a database of theatre practitioners, organised seminars and conferences, and published a range of outputs [1, 2] including a major co-authored book [3]. Written by Thompson, Hughes and Co-Investigator Michael Balfour, and including testimonials from artists, [3] was reviewed as a “pioneering study”. Referring to its innovative structure and content, one reviewer noted, “Nothing of this sort has been attempted before” (Marvin Carlson), and another, that the book, “brilliantly situates war-related performance in a complex web which includes […] politics, ethics, trauma, geography, and intercultural perspectives” (Jan Cohen-Cruz , NTQ). The AHRC research leave grant [G3] allowed Thompson to complete a monograph [4]. The project RA, Jenny Hughes, published [5] from her research during the project and project PhD student, Alison Jeffers, published [6]. Hughes and Jeffers’ publications jointly won the Theatre and Performance Research Association (TaPRA) prize for Early Career Researchers in 2012. In 2010, IPOW won the Times Higher Education ‘Excellence and Innovation in the Arts’ award.
A central concern of the original research was to create and enable networks of artists to draw on their expertise and develop systems through which they might sustain their work. The subsequent funding from Leverhulme [G2] allowed the original networks of scholars and artists to be developed and expanded. This phase (2008-2011) included three major conferences in Manchester (UK), Pristina (Kosovo) and Goma (Democratic Republic of Congo) targeted at arts and conflict practitioners, as well as academics and students. This body of research provided a more in-depth and nuanced understanding of the complex role and operational limitations of the arts in war and disaster situations. The research provided a means to critique existing practices [e.g. 2] with the aim of supporting the improvement of artistic responses and ensuring that donor support is more sensitive to local contexts. This is notable in [3] below, where the artists’ voice was given particular pre-eminence to allow them to explain the demands of their different contexts, and is extended through the other underpinning research [4, 5, 6]. IPOW as a research project produced a model of practice that created new alliances and networks of practitioners, providing the means to challenge the limitations of their professional and geographical isolation and relocating their work as central to local and national development concerns. It identified the need for support for emerging artists in order to enhance their capacity to sustain their practice and develop livelihoods from their artistic work – and this then prompted the transformation of IPOW as a research project into IPOW as an arts organisation.
3. References to the research
Thompson, J. (2005) Digging Up Stories: Applied Theatre, Performance and War. Manchester: Manchester University Press. (Available from HEI on request.)
Thompson, J. (2006) Performance of pain, performance of beauty. Research In Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance. 11:1, pp. 47-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569780500437689
Thompson, J., Hughes, J., Balfour, M. (2009) Performance In Place of War. Calcutta/Chicago: Seagull Press/Chicago University Press. (Available from HEI on request.)
Thompson, J. (2009) Performance Affects: Applied Theatre and the End of Effect. London: Palgrave. (Available from HEI on request.)
Hughes, J. (2011) Performance in a Time of Terror. Manchester: Manchester University Press. (Available from HEI on request.)
Jeffers, A. (2011) Refugees, Theatre and Crisis: Performing Global Identities. London: Palgrave. (Available from HEI on request.)
Evidence of quality
The research was supported by AHRC and The Leverhulme Trust through the following key awards:
G1 AHRC ‘Performance and War’, 2004-2008, PI Thompson, UoM awarded GBP386,572.
G2 The Leverhulme Trust, ‘In Place of War: Theatre, Performance and War Research and Practice Network II’, 2008-2011, PI Thompson, Co-I Hughes, UoM awarded GBP91,724.
G3 AHRC AH/E004172/1 ‘Exhalations: Performance and Crisis’, 2008, PI Thompson, UoM awarded GBP31,469.
G4 AHRC AH/J013293/1 ‘In Place of War: A Digital Platform for Artists in Conflict Zones’, 2012-2013, PI Thompson, UoM awarded GBP91,743.
Reference [1] was described as “an important book. It should be on the book shelves of all those who teach or who practice applied theatre. It should be compulsory reading for all students on applied theatre courses.” (Bill McDonnell, RiDE: The Journal of Applied Theatre and performance) Reviewers described [4] as a "bold, admirable, moving, lucid and persuasive" account (Jen Harvie , RiDE: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance) and [6] as "original and provocative . . . a call for and significant contribution to an ethical understanding of refugees" (Caoimhe McAvinchey , NTQ).
4. Details of the impact
The starting point for the original IPOW research was that arts expertise in war zones was not to be found in the international organisations importing artists into these zones, but rather in the expertise that already existed amongst artists and audiences living in these places. The research thus led to a model for supporting, documenting and providing a platform for artistic expertise from within places of conflict in a way that enhanced the success and sustainability of those projects. This mission continues to drive IPOW in its new form as an arts organisation. IPOW now operates and funds a pro-active, cyclical process of engaging artists, learning about and documenting their work and then using that knowledge to support and enhance artistic practice and its distribution. IPOW is a professional arts organisation with charitable status and is led by CEO Ruth Daniel, the original project administrator on the first AHRC-funded research project in 2004.
This case study documents the impacts achieved from August 2013 onwards. IPOW as a ‘spin-out’ from the research project is a key impact of this REF period, with the gradual transformation from 2014, first into Community Interest Company and then formal incorporation as a Charity in 2019. This was an organic process as the learning from the research, and the experience of the staff who stayed with the project, emerged into a demand for an organisational structure that would offer the support and sustainability that the research had identified was missing. IPOW employs artists, freelancers and a range of associates, offering paid work for at least 5 people, and now has an annual turnover of approximately GBP250,000 [A]. It has helped to set up 10 new additional arts organisations and companies including ‘In Place of War USA’, as well as music venues in South Africa, Uganda and Palestine. The UK Charity (charity number 1182594) has a board chaired by Vikas Shah MBE and the original project PI, Professor James Thompson, is also a Board member. The US company has a separate Board chaired by the internationally renowned music producer Bob Ezrin. IPOW works with existing grassroots arts and cultural organisations in some of the most hard-to-reach and life-challenging areas of the world, to build capacity and amplify their impact so that they can continue to exist and flourish.
Trackside Creative Soweto and Northern Uganda HipHop Culture (NUHC) are two working examples that share a concern with enabling the production and distribution of music:
After undertaking a needs analysis with Trackside, IPOW offered a tailored package of support to address some of the challenges faced in turning a neglected site in post-Apartheid South Africa into a thriving cultural hub. This included a business support plan, the provision of music and sound equipment and creative entrepreneur training, alongside enabling the participation of Trackside staff in international networking events hosted by IPOW partners in India, Kenya and the UK. Trackside is now a central part of the Soweto cultural scene, catering for 100 artists, producers and DJs who are building their own creative enterprises [A, B].
Founded in 2009 in Gulu, Northern Uganda, NUHC is a community-based organisation set up to empower young people through hip-hop, in an area recovering from a twenty-year period of military conflict. NUHC organise outreach work in prisons and training centres promoting both the development of hip-hop skills as well as awareness around HIV/AIDS and malaria prevention. Working with IPOW on a number of projects has enabled NUHC to develop a cultural space, new skills in training and project management and knowledge of fundraising techniques. It has also provided access to new networks in both Uganda and beyond from 2015 to present. IPOW secured the donation of IT and music equipment and members of NUHC were trained in its use and maintenance by professional musicians and engineers from IPOW’s network and in partnership with Ronnie Scott’s Charitable Foundation [A, C].
IPOW’s work is now focused on three areas of activity:
1. Creative Entrepreneurship: Developing Knowledge, Skills and Professional Networks
IPOW has created training for creative practitioners and artists in sites of conflict. The Creative and Social Enterprise programme (CASE) is an introductory short course certified by UoM and demonstrates an innovative way of translating research findings into an educational tool for artists in sites of conflict. It was developed in 2015, along with a train-the-trainer programme to prepare local educators to deliver the programme in their communities in Arabic and English. An updated version including new resources and a student workbook was developed in 2017. A Spanish version was developed in 2018 in preparation for a pilot CASE programme in Medellín, Colombia, in 2019-2020 in partnership with the British Council Colombia. The CASE has been delivered in over 18 countries in the Middle East and North Africa [D], Southern and Eastern Africa. By the end of 2019, IPOW had trained more than 600 participants and 210 trainers [A, E], contributing to an emerging creative industries ecosystem in the Global South. Source [E] demonstrates that the training generated new partnerships and collaboration amongst creatives from diverse disciplines, which resulted in new projects being developed and paid opportunities for artists and community educators [E].
In one example, from 2018, IPOW and partners in Uganda delivered the Enabling Enterprise in Uganda project: here 56 young people aged between 17 and 30 participated in the CASE training programme in Kampala and Gulu. Participant evaluation showed that the programme had improved knowledge of the creative industries and entrepreneurialism and understanding of business practices and frameworks, as well as enabling the establishment of new networks and opportunities for collaboration [E]. Being awarded a certificate of participation is significant for artists and cultural managers, many of whom had their formal education disrupted because of military conflict. The programme also supported professionalising and formalising business activity. The evaluation indicated that 40% of the participants registered businesses by the end of the training [E] – a first step in demonstrating new professional capacity. Furthermore, interviews with a selection of participants demonstrated that participation on the programme had enabled them to develop new partnerships and networking which had led to new employment opportunities [E].
In addition to this, the CASE programme has been run in collaboration with civil society partners (local NGOs, social enterprises, cultural and education institutions) in Germany, Greece, Lebanon and Sweden. This project also enabled IPOW to develop new training resources on using arts and culture to engage with refugee and asylum seeker communities. Drawing on experiences of these civil society organisations, the toolkit featured video interviews, examples of good practice and practical considerations [F].
2. Co-creating and Supporting Cultural Spaces
IPOW supports and develops cultural spaces as secure locations in areas affected by conflict in which members of the community can engage in artistic expression. IPOW works with existing cultural spaces to develop their capacity and improve their sustainability through training, networking and cultural leaders’ events and provision of resources. It has produced a network of 150 cultural spaces (NAFASI), bringing members together in different countries for knowledge exchange programmes [G]. It has supported the development of new spaces in South Africa, Zimbabwe, Uganda, Palestine, Colombia and New York. The collection and distribution of equipment, reported above, responds to artists’ testimony requesting concrete and material support to counter isolation and lack of infrastructure [A, B].
3. Facilitating Artistic Collaboration
Between 2016 and 2018, IPOW mobilised approximately 1,000 artists from 25 countries, worked with festival platforms in 20 countries, and facilitated more than 30 music collaboration projects [A, G, H, I]. This work included: supporting the music of AWA from Zimbabwe and the subsequent release of the film AWA: Zimbabwe’s Rap Queen, which has been viewed 70,000 times [A]; the collaboration of Zimbabwean musician Dhadza D together with Brazilian hip-hop artist Dughattuto to record new music and build new networks for their powerful community work; and finally, the internationally successful 9 piece all women group GRRRL, whose members come from war zones all over the world [I]. Women of colour from conflict zones are amongst the most marginalised and IPOW sought to address this lack of women’s voice by creating GRRRL, an electronic music collaboration between a group of women from different countries. 9 women have worked with Laima Leyton (Mixhell/Soulwax) to create a music and touring project that has in turn involved 40 women performing in festivals and music venues across UK and Europe. GRRRL has been funded by Arts Council England (ACE) and the PRS Foundation [I] and performances have included performing at the Festival 2018 as part of the Australian Commonwealth Games in 2018 [I]. Overall in 2017 there were 40 new music recordings including the establishment of a new record label called Barrio Electric to promote this work (see some recordings at [I]).
GRRRL came from IPOW’s Voices of the Revolution project, which brought together female musicians from around the world to collaborate (5 programmes; the latest in 2016). Voices of the Revolution received funding from ACE 3 times. In 2016, 19 artists performed at venues in the UK, including: POP Brixton (audience approximately 600); Freedom Festival, Hull (audience approximately 3,000); Shambala Festival (audience approximately 3,000); and Festival Number 6 (audience approximately 2,000).
IPOW has recently received the following awards: UK JCI TOYP Award for Outstanding Young Person, 2017; SIM São Paulo Nomination for Innovation in Music, 2017; UoM, Making a Difference Award, Widening Participation, 2017; Small Charity of the Year, North-West Charity Prize, 2017. IPOW is currently in receipt of funding from: MasterCard Foundation, The PRS Foundation, ACE, The British Council (Colombia and South Africa), Ronnie Scott’s Charitable Foundation, Anna Lindh Foundation, Stanley Thomas Johnson Foundation and The Mark Leonard Trust.
In 2020 IPOW worked with its networks to develop direct support for communities affected by COVID-19, raising money and distributing support via artists in vulnerable communities [J]. It supported 40 grassroots organisations with seed funding of between USD1,000 and USD4,000, across 22 countries. The total fund was USD50,000, raised from partnerships with commercial music industry partners [J].
5. Sources to corroborate the impact
In Place of War annual reports 2016 and 2017; In Place of War CIO Report and financial statements 2019 [documenting key activities and outcomes 2016, 2017; key activities, performance and financial information for the year ending 30 June 2019].
Film documenting IPOW’s work with Trackside: In Place of War: A Trackside Story (2017):
Film documenting IPOW’s work with Northern Uganda HipHop Culture (2017): https://www.facebook.com/InPlaceOfWar/videos/benny-from-northern-uganda-hip-hop-culture/1363213513732732/
In Place of War. Creative Entrepreneurialism across the MENA region: Global results of data collation [evaluation report].
In Place of War. 2018. Enabling Enterprise in Uganda: Evaluation Report. Available at: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1oO21EadjyLDAFAIEtX5UCE90e9IbhO0-/view?usp=sharing
In Place of War. 2017. Evaluation of the Creative and Social Entrepreneur Train the Trainer Programme [evaluation report for the programme with civil society organisations in Germany, Greece, Lebanon and Sweden]. Available at:
Film series documenting the NAFASI cultural spaces network (2016):
Film: Artistic Collaboration in a Place of Political Oppression: In Place of War in Zimbabwe (2018): https://youtu.be/-GsgXslTH1k
GRRRL: website https://www.grrrl.net and at the 2018 Commonwealth Games:
IPOW COVID-19 response page https://www.inplaceofwar.net/current-projects-blog/covid-19-emergency-fund and response document (2020).
- Submitting institution
- The University of Manchester
- Unit of assessment
- 33 - Music, Drama, Dance, Performing Arts, Film and Screen Studies : A - Drama, Dance, Performing Arts, Film and Screen Studies
- Summary impact type
- Societal
- Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
- No
1. Summary of the impact
Multi-Story Water (MSW) was a community-facing, practice-as-research project aimed at developing understanding and engagement between local communities and responsible agencies in flood-prone areas of Yorkshire’s Aire valley. The project used site-responsive creative methods to stimulate community dialogue and capacity building, in an evolving, participatory process. Notable impacts for communities and stakeholders in Yorkshire include: catalysing the foundation of a housing estate residents’ group which has since secured significant riverside landscape improvements; creating a stakeholder network group which has informed communication strategies in the water sector, with benefits for the Environment Agency, local councils and charities; and contributions to innovative public communications strategies highlighting major flood alleviation and river improvement schemes. Although much of the impact is geographically local, the research has had national reach, through the sharing of outcomes (performances, films, blog posts) among senior professionals.
2. Underpinning research
Multi-Story Water was supported by the AHRC in two distinct phases:
MSW Phase 1 - Multi-Story Water (2012-13): PI Bottoms initiated project at the University of Leeds but moved to The University of Manchester after three months of 12. The Phase 1 project [Grant G1; see section 3] responded to an initial question from the Environment Agency’s national stakeholder engagement manager, as to whether site-based performance might be employed as a tool to explore flood risk awareness in two ‘hard-to-reach’ urban communities (Eastville in Bristol, and Shipley, Bradford). The performance outcomes responded to the differing contexts [1], but common findings across both sites included: (i) urban communities are not necessarily ‘disconnected’ from the environment in the manner assumed by responsible agencies; rather, they may simply lack community cohesion and/or their views have remained unvoiced/unheard; (ii) involving residents with their local rivers demands more than single-issue flood messaging: flood awareness is entangled with many other issues related to water environments (biodiversity, community identity, heritage narratives, etc.) which can be recognised and utilised for dialogue and engagement; (iii) river-sited performances can reflect and enhance communities’ ‘sense of place’ and catalyse unanticipated grassroots action [2].
MSW Phase 2 - Towards Hydro-Citizenship (THC) (2014-17): As reported in The Guardian [A.i; see section 5], Phase 1 findings directly informed the framing of research questions for this extended, interdisciplinary project conducted in four project areas and involving eight HEIs (GBP1,500,000 total grant; PI Owain Jones, Bath Spa) [G2]. THC sought to: (i) examine communities’ relationships with their distinct water environments; (ii) use context-appropriate arts methods to reflect and share findings within and beyond those communities; (iii) fold these creative interventions back into further strengthening of community relations, as a means to build collective capacity toward proactive engagement with the water environment (‘hydro-citizenship’). This impact case study focuses on impacts from the West Yorkshire area project, where Bottoms (Co-I) was case study leader, supported by Lyze Dudley (RA, 0.5). The ‘Multi-Story Water’ name and blogsite [3] were retained for these activities, to maintain public continuity from Phase 1.
In Shipley, research was conducted in collaboration with the Kirkgate Centre (third sector organisation with community development remit), in contrasting waterside neighbourhoods with multiple deprivation indices. Residents were invited to participate in a dialogue and creative activities, with a focus on water features (river, canal, flood plain) as potential assets in a collective capacity-building process [4]. Selected creative outcomes were also shared with the wider public, as a means to give voice/identity to these communities. These were typically staged outdoors, free of charge, at local festivals – to capitalise on increased footfall [5]. Performance methods included short plays, walking tours, films and participatory installations. Each piece constituted a Practice-as-Research outcome in its own right (PaR), by deploying research findings in context-specific formats that sought to be both aesthetically original and widely accessible (attracting audiences of varying ages and backgrounds).
A distinctive feature of the Yorkshire project area was the further cultivation of relationships initiated during MSW Phase 1 with stakeholders in the professional water sector. These partners were approached less as ‘experts’ (in hierarchical relationship with ‘locals’) than as a community of hydro-citizens who might also benefit from collaborative dialogues, particularly around questions of public communication [6]. Researchers developed an informal professional network in Leeds with further PaR outcomes arising from this engagement process. The project’s emphasis on devising modestly-scaled performances as catalysts for ongoing dialogue enabled flexibility in response to changing circumstances: e.g. major floods at Christmas 2015 prompted the making of After the Flood (Leeds) and Too Much of Water (Shipley). Subsequent published outputs articulated the key finding that both communities and professional partners welcomed the improvisatory creative process as one they could actively take ownership of and learn from. Acts of hydro-citizenship have thus been stimulated and sustained beyond the life of the project itself.
3. References to the research
- Bottoms, S. and McEwen, L. (2014). Multi-Story Water: Sited Performance in Urban River Communities (AHRC/University of Manchester). Project report at
https://issuu.com/martinharriscentre/docs/drama_multi-story_water_report
Bottoms, S. (2017). ‘The Agency of Environment: Artificial Hells and Multi-Story Water’. In Harpin, A. and Nicholson, H. (Eds) Performance and Participation: Practices, Audiences, Politics (London: Palgrave), pp. 167-188. [PDF copy can be supplied by HEI on request.]
‘Multi-Story Water’ website at www.multi-story-shipley.co.uk includes full documentation of Practice-as-Research outputs, including performance scripts, films and audio/visual material. Work-in-progress blog posts document the evolution of both project phases in detail. The site was designed to be community-facing and is thus informal in tone.
Roe, M. and Scott-Bottoms, S. (2020). ‘Improvisation as Method: Engaging “hearts and minds” in the landscape through creative practice.’ Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 47, 126547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126547
Scott-Bottoms, S. (2019). ‘The Rise and Fall of Modern Water: From Staging Abstraction to Performing Place.’ Theatre Journal 71.4 (December), pp.415-435.
https://doi.org/10.1353/tj.2019.0092
- Scott-Bottoms, S. and Roe, M. (2020). ‘Who is a hydrocitizen? The use of dialogic arts methods as a research tool among water professionals in West Yorkshire, UK.’ Local Environment 25.4, pp.273-89. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2020.1732897
Evidence of quality: The research was funded through two awards from AHRC: G1 AH/K502789/2 ‘“Before the Flood”: Interweaving situated performance and flood narratives for resilience building in hard-to-reach flood risk communities’, UoM awarded GBP69,177, 2012-2013, PI Scott-Bottoms; G2 AH/L008165/1 ‘Towards Hydrocitizenship. Connecting communities with and through responses to interdependent, multiple water issues’, UoM awarded GBP210,293, 2014-2017, Co-I Scott-Bottoms. Publications 4-6 appeared in international, peer-reviewed journals.
4. Details of the impact
Context: The significance and reach of this project’s impact is demonstrated through the benefits arising for: communities in flood-prone areas; water sector stakeholders; public audiences. The research developed in the context of increased focus in UK policymaking on ‘distributed responsibility’ for flood risk management, as enshrined in the 2010 Flood and Water Management Act. This means that responsibility for flood risk mitigation is now shared among communities, businesses and homeowners, as well as national and local government organisations. The policy shift highlighted a need for new approaches to community engagement with the water environment, to enable capacity-building rather than simply ‘passing the buck’. MSW’s action-research approach thus sought to model alternative communication approaches between and among communities and professional stakeholders. Countering the tendency of water-sector agencies to use only one-way messaging, dialogue-based methods were used to identify environmental issues of concern to participants, and sited public performances to highlight and extend awareness of these concerns. Coverage of MSW’s work included regional press [A.i, A.ii] and appearances on BBC Radio Leeds [B] and BCB radio (Bradford Community Broadcasting).
Benefits for communities in flood-prone areas of Yorkshire: Engagement with residents of Shipley’s Higher Coach Road estate (approximately 250 homes), initiated in 2012, developed further between 2014 and 2017. Relationships built through research-led conversations informed a series of site-based creative interventions on the stretch of flood plain between the river and houses [4]. These helped residents of a marginalised council estate to identify this under-utilised landscape feature as a space to exercise collective agency. The Higher Coach Road Residents’ Group (HCRRG) was founded in 2015 to develop and articulate a shared identity for the estate, rooted in their riverside location. “The Multi-Story Water project was a key factor in our deciding to establish the Residents Group,” their Secretary confirms: “the passion, energy and ebullience [of the researchers] helped us to see that establishing a clear community identity was within the realms of possibility” [C.iv]. Desired landscape improvements, initially articulated by residents through dialogue with the researchers, have now been successfully implemented by the group with funding secured from external agencies (Bradford Council, Baildon Town Council, Pocket Parks Plus). These include: a permanent riverside footpath (600 m), with connecting paths to houses; a wildflower meadow; nature trail signage; and a children’s football pitch [D.i]. MSW’s environment-based arts activities prompted HCRRG to request weekly, outdoor art workshops for children/young people. These began in 2016, with MSW seed-funding, and continue to date with local council funding of approximately GBP2,000 per year since 2018. Parents identify sustained educational and wellbeing benefits, as the young people have built confidence in themselves. Several are now members of Baildon Youth Council, where they advocate for their peers: "these teenagers are amazing and some of them would have been very different people if the Multi-Story Water project hadn't given us that initial support to get started” [C.iv]. HCRRG continues to work for improved amenities and greater social cohesion (e.g. coordinating visits to isolated older people), and has been identified nationally by the Labour Party as an exemplary grassroots organisation [D.ii]. Its Facebook group has more than 800 followers.
A parallel engagement process with residents of the canalside Crosley Wood estate (three high-rise towers) highlighted particularly severe problems with deprivation and poor housing conditions. The researchers concluded that awareness of these environmental issues needed to be raised in the wider community. Thus, the short film High Rise Damp (2016) was co-created with residents, with water as a connecting theme. First screened at Kirkgate Centre’s AGM, then online, the film sparked a local campaign to hold the social housing provider accountable for living conditions. “The film that Stephen put together really hit home the issues residents were having to endure living in these poorly maintained blocks,” writes the Bingley Town Councillor who orchestrated the campaign: “From that point onwards I started to work with them and raise their complaints formally as a local representative.” [C.v]. As he further explains, the campaign made active use of both the film and posts on our MSW blog. The housing provider had declared the tower blocks fit for purpose in 2016. Yet campaigners eventually secured a commitment to the rehoming all residents in 2018, prior to the blocks’ demolition, and to a new build on the canalside site that would still prioritise social housing alongside private rental.
Benefits for professional water-sector stakeholders in West Yorkshire: In Leeds, engagement with water-sector professionals led to the establishment of ‘Friends of Fred’ (FoF) as an informal network group, from January 2015. Chaired and facilitated by Bottoms, FoF met monthly for over 3 years, at the request of participants: “For me, this was a ‘must attend’ meeting” [C.iii]. Representatives from the Environment Agency (EA), Leeds City Council (LCC), Aire Rivers Trust (ART), Bradford Council, Yorkshire Water and the Canal and River Trust developed an improvisatory, agenda-free dialogue practice, guided by Scott-Bottoms’ background in collaborative devising processes [6]. During a period of significant flux in the sector, FoF was welcomed as a ‘safe space’ to rehearse innovative ideas around public engagement and partnership working. These discussions informed local and regional policy-making approaches. FoF’s identifiable impacts include: (1) “The group was instrumental in the development of the Aire Catchment Network” [C.i]. FoF’s non-hierarchical dialogue methods directly influenced LCC’s Flood Risk Manager to pursue a similarly inclusive approach during planning for Phase 2 (GBP60,000,000) of the Leeds Flood Alleviation Scheme (FAS). Traditionally, large flood schemes are designed by engineers before being opened out for consultation, but in this case the consultation informed the design stages : “I opted to create a network of people rather than a partnership or traditional project group, bringing in a much wider range of people than we would normally consider” [C.ii]. The resulting network is now the Defra-supported Catchment Partnership; (2) FoF “undoubtedly influenced the perspectives and approaches of participants towards the Leeds Waterfront.” [C.iii] This prompted a push within the city for a full-time co-ordinator of the annual Waterfront Festival, to help stimulate greater public engagement with the river: “a post has now been fully funded by Leeds CC” [C.iii]. Describing the cumulative benefits of FoF for participating stakeholders, a senior EA manager describes Scott-Bottoms’s facilitating role as that of a “business change manager” influencing approaches to public engagement within the water sector : “That debate has really shifted, and for me, that is largely a result of the Hydro-Citizenship research” [C.i]; “ FoF was invaluable in developing deep relationships between participants that have…enabled challenging conversations beyond the corporate constraints so often evident” (Chairman, ART [C.iii]).
Leeds-based social enterprise Canal Connections (CC) was founded in 2012, using the fee paid to its Director by MSW (for community engagement work) as seed-corn funding. CC became a key partner in the MSW2 research, supporting and benefiting from development of the FoF network, and learning from participation in creative research. “In a very real sense,” the Director writes, “ MSW gave us the leg-up we needed to develop our initial aspirations as a social enterprise” [C.vi]. CC uses canal boats to engage disadvantaged participants with sited arts/heritage activities. It currently runs two Heritage Lottery Fund (HLF) projects which develop contacts and ideas developed during MSW2: ‘Float Your Boat’ (2018-21) brings together older, isolated men in collaborative projects; ‘Ignite Yorkshire’ (2018-22) works with young people including Shipley’s Cactus Crew (which evolved from the HCR young artists’ group).
In response to the 2015 Boxing Day floods, After the Flood (2016) dramatised professional flood alleviation strategies as a mobile theatre event for Leeds Waterfront Festival. Audience feedback called it “ a brilliant experience”; “very informative and eye-opening”; “it made me think of the city differently” [E.i]. A film version was solicited by curators at Leeds City Museums, who screened it on a loop for six months as part of their ‘Flood Response’ exhibition between December 2016 and May 2017.
Too Much of Water (2016), a solo storytelling piece based on interviews with Shipley residents affected by the Boxing Day flood, was commissioned for Shipley’s Saltaire Festival, to share these stories within the local community. The piece’s affective emphasis on the human impacts of flooding proved transferable to many other contexts, particularly for professionals who deal with flooding. LCC’s Flood Risk Officer, who requested a performance for his team, noted that TMoW is “an excellent way to build a vital skill and understanding in flood risk professionals . . . that every story, every person is different and equally significant” [C.ii]. Scott-Bottoms had begun working on training workshops for this LCC team, to build confidence in public communications, when the COVID-19 pandemic forced suspension. For ART’s Chairman, TMoW crystallised MSW2’s wider impact: “I have myself come to a deeper and wider understanding of the effects of flooding on people, as compared to the technical understanding” [C.iii]. TMoW has been performed over 25 times, by invitation, at locations nationally including: Insurance Institute of Leeds (twice), Mytholmroyd Festival (Calderdale), and three West Yorkshire primary schools (full list at [3]). A performance at the 7th International Conference on Flood Management (Leeds, 2017) prompted an invitation from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineering, to present TMoW at its 2018 flood conference in Indianapolis (rescinded after the Trump administration forbade funding to overseas speakers). At a 2018 Manchester performance (134 attendees), 74% of 72 questionnaire respondents gave the piece a 5 out of 5 rating [E.ii]. An EA colleague adds: “The Too Much Water show was very powerful and I still signpost partners and colleagues to [the film of] this work online, including our [national EA] Chair […], who was impressed and taken with the people-focussed emphasis” [C.i].
The success of these flood-focused pieces prompted Leeds FAS partners to invite MSW collaboration on public dissemination of its Phase 1 installation, in 2017 [5]. The research team worked directly with engineering contractors BAM Nuttall to present Weir Science as a showcase for the city’s new GBP30,000,000 collapsible weirs. Audience feedback, rendered onsite as a graphic mural, was installed in FAS site HQ [E.iii]. “This event constituted a step-change for us, in terms of the extent and quality of public interest that was generated in the flood alleviation works—far more so than in more standard public consultation processes” [C.i]. Subsequently, FAS partners funded MSW researchers to contribute creative elements to first-stage public consultations on the Phase 2 scheme (October 2017). Environment Agency colleagues also invited Scott-Bottoms to devise the script for an information video on internal communication strategies, which was circulated nationally within the EA [F].
In 2019, ART requested a revival of This Island’s Mine, an interactive play originally developed in 2017 for/about the Dockfield neighbourhood of Shipley, as part of the HLF-funded DNAire project (ART/EA). DNAire focuses on ‘restoring the natural heritage’ of the Aire, by building fish passes on former industrial weirs to allow salmon, eels etc. to access the river’s upper reaches. This Island’s Mine was revived as a pilot initiative, touring selected venues in the upper Aire valley, to stimulate dialogue around people’s sense of place/heritage in relation to the river. Scott-Bottoms’s report on this successful pilot outlined engagement proposals for the full DNAire project phase (2020-23), and was incorporated wholesale into a successful funding bid (total value GBP2,300,000) [G]. HLF feedback specifically commended the pilot report [C.iii].
Summary: Statements from stakeholders were gathered in 2020, almost three years after the funded research ended. “I am impressed with the longevity of [these] interventions,” notes the Chairman of Aire Rivers Trust : “As we went around communities as part of our research for DNAire, the mention of [this] work opened doors much more quickly than would otherwise be the case” [C.iii]. Leeds’s chief Flood Manager states that the research “has had a tangible impact on the way I engage with people” [C.ii]. A senior manager at EA Yorkshire concurs that MSW “has fundamentally shaped how I work with others,” because the research brought into focus the fact “that it is fundamental to think about how we tell the story of our work in places and communities. It’s not an add-on or a nicety. It’s about how we reach out to a wider public to involve them in the environmental challenges we all face.” [C.i].
5. Sources to corroborate the impact
Press: (i) ‘Corporate sustainability messaging isn't working: it's time to look to the arts’, The Guardian, 15.1.14: https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/corporate-messaging-art-provoke-response; (ii) ‘Boxing Day flood stories lead walkers on trail of discovery’, Yorkshire Post, 23.6.16; (iii) ‘Walking on Water’, Yorkshire Life, October 2016.
BBC Radio interviews: Richard Stead Show (Radio Leeds, August 2016); Paul Hudson Weather Show (all Yorkshire stations, 23.9.17). Recordings on MSW website: http://multi-story-shipley.co.uk/?page_id=2916.
Statements from: (i) Environment Agency Yorkshire’s Environment Planning & Engagement Manager (30 April 2020); (ii) Leeds City Council’s Flood Risk Officer (3 February 2020); (iii) Chairman, Aire Rivers Trust (8 March 2020); (iv) Secretary, Higher Coach Road Residents’ Group (29 February 2020); (v) Bingley Town Councillor (6 March 2020); (vi) Director, Canal Connections (10 April 2020).
Reports from Bradford Telegraph & Argus on (i) HCRRG’s flood plain improvements (12 March 2019): https://www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/news/17493022.residents-group-helps-secure-new-pathway-and-wildflower-meadow/; and (ii) Labour Party endorsement (23 March 2019): https://www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/news/17522935.shadow-transport-secretary-andy-mcdonald-backs-baildon-bus-campaign/.
Audience feedback: (i) Visitors’ Book collecting audience feedback for After the Flood, 2016; (ii) Feedback data on Too Much of Water, gathered by Insurance Institute of Leeds (qualitative) and Green Impact Awards team, University of Manchester (quantitative); (iii) Photos of wall mural by graphic harvester Jon Dorsett, collating feedback on Weir Science, 2017.
EA Knowledge Management video, 2016: https://youtu.be/nh_EFqH5E3g
Audience feedback and impact analysis for This Island’s Mine is contained in ‘Report on Pilot Engagement for DNAire Project ’, prepared for Aire Rivers Trust/HLF.