Impact case study database
- Submitting institution
- Bournemouth University
- Unit of assessment
- 15 - Archaeology
- Summary impact type
- Societal
- Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
- No
1. Summary of the impact
Researchers at Bournemouth University (BU) used chickens as a vehicle to engage diverse national and international audiences in exploring food production, human-animal relationships, economic significance, sustainability and wellbeing. They have:
transformed teaching practice in the UK and Ethiopia, raising the educational attainment and aspirations of more than 3,000 students;
reframed public perceptions by promoting greater understanding of the links between people and animals, with events, exhibitions, films and podcasts reaching approximately 100,000 people, including the general public and heritage practitioners.
The impact of the research has been felt on a very personal, yet international, scale. It has also enhanced public appreciation of the importance of academic research into the past in understanding the present.
2. Underpinning research
Chickens are the world’s most widespread and abundant domestic animals. They number more than 23,000,000,000 and provide much of the world’s primary meat and egg resources. Their diffusion from their Southeast Asia origin is almost entirely due to human-assisted transportation; as such, their natural history reflects human history, and the species holds a high degree of social significance. However, the timing and circumstances of their spread across the globe, and their transition into a food resource have been poorly understood.
In 2014, Maltby was awarded GBP1,576,505 by the Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC) to research chicken use from their first domestication to their modern-day roles and examine the cultural and environmental impact of this important species. The resulting landmark ‘Cultural and Scientific Perceptions of Human-Chicken Interactions’ project brought together researchers from six universities with expertise in zooarchaeology, anthropology, ecology and genetics. This section focuses on BU’s specific contributions. We have conducted ground-breaking studies in animal-human relationships and have facilitated cross-disciplinary collaborations. Combined with this is an exemplar of how our integrated research and impact strategies and interdisciplinary ethos have created world-class outputs.
Maltby led pioneering research into the exploitation of chickens through time, focusing on Roman Britain [R1]. Best investigated egg production through medullary bone laid within the shafts of the bones of laying hens, and via working with colleagues from the University of York, to develop analytical techniques in the study of ancient eggshells [R2, R3, R4]. This revolutionised understanding of egg production and showed that, shortly after their introduction, chickens were laying regularly [R1].
Best led research in tracing the spread of chickens in Europe via a targeted radiocarbon dating programme, funded in-kind by the Natural Environment Research Council (NF/2015/2/5), and through study of chickens and eggs in burial environments [R3]. The results challenged previous interpretations and demonstrated how chickens moved from being prize exotics [R3] to disposable food [R1, R4, R5]. Two doctoral research projects, supervised by Maltby and Hambleton, extended this research. The first examined the ecology of jungle fowl and chickens, particularly around the routes of domestication [R6] and the second revealed the cultural, social and symbolic role of chickens in material culture in Roman Britain and Gaul [R7].
Maltby and Best collated bone samples from across Europe to create the largest species-specific zooarchaeological database in the world, enabling complex, multidisciplinary research collaboration in archaeological science. The outputs based on this research included:
past-population demographics and the anthropology underlying modern chicken exploitation [R1, R4], size changes in chickens through time, productivity, and chicken health and welfare [R4];
isotope baselines for interpreting lipid evidence were created on a site-specific level, establishing for the first time that it is possible to recognise chicken food remains in pottery [R5];
nitrogen and carbon stable isotopes, providing new insights into variations in chicken diets in the past and present [R5];
ecological niche and genetic studies that have advanced our knowledge of the origins of domestic chickens and in the history of different types of chickens [R6].
Our seminal work has demonstrated that human and chicken health and well-being are inextricably linked in areas such as diet, religion, zoonotic disease and environmental sustainability. The project has transformed our understanding of the spread of domestic chickens through Europe. It has deepened our knowledge of how they were exploited and how they have been transformed from an exotic item often imbued with symbolic significance to the mass production associated with modern broiler chickens, whose skeletal morphology, pathology, bone geochemistry and genetics are very different to those of their ancestors.
The research provided the basis for the University of Nottingham’s project ‘Going Places: Empowering Women, Enhancing Heritage and Increasing Chicken Production in Ethiopia’, funded by a Global Challenges Research Fund (GCRF) Innovation Award. This, in turn, led to a GBP73,382 AHRC Follow-On Funding project, ‘Causing a Flap’, award to Maltby in 2018. It enabled BU and University of Exeter to translate the research findings from the original chicken project and the social findings from the GCRF project into educational resources and personal stories of benefit.
3. References to the research
R1-7 have all been subject to rigorous peer-review.
R1: Maltby, M., Allen, M., Best, J., Fothergill, B.T. and Demarchi. B. (2018), “Counting Roman chickens: multidisciplinary approaches to human-chicken interactions in Roman Britain,” Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 19, pp. 1003-1015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2017.09.013
R2: Presslee, S., Wilson, J., Woolley, J., Best, J., Russell, D., Radini, A., Fischer, R., Kessler, B., Boano, R., Collins, M. and Demarchi, B. (2017), “The identification of archaeological eggshell using peptide markers,” STAR: Science & Technology of Archaeological Research, 3(1), 89-99. https://doi.org/10.1080/20548923.2018.1424300
R3: Jonuks, T., Oras, E., Best, J., Demarchi, B., Mänd, R., Presslee, S. and Vahur, S. (2018), “Multi-method analysis of avian eggs as grave goods: revealing symbolism in conversion period burials at Kukruse, NE Estonia,” Environmental Archaeology, 23 (2), pp. 109-122. https://doi.org/10.1080/14614103.2016.1263374
R4: Fothergill, B. T., Best, J., Foster, A. and Demarchi. B. (2017), “Hens, health and husbandry: integrated approaches to past poultry-keeping in England,” Open Quaternary, 3 (5), pp. 1–25. http://doi.org/10.5334/oq.34
R5: Colonese, A., Lucquin, A., Guedes, E., Thomas, R., Best, J., Fothergill, T., Sykes, N., Foster, A., Miller, H., Poole, K., Maltby, M., and Craig, O. (2017), “The identification of poultry processing in archaeological ceramic vessels using in-situ isotope references for organic residue analysis,” Journal of Archaeological Science 78, pp. 179-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2016.12.006
R6: Pitt, J., Gillingham, P., Maltby, M. and Stewart. J. (2016), “New perspectives on the ecology of early domestic fowl: an interdisciplinary approach,” Journal of Archaeological Science 74, pp. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2016.08.004
R7: Feider, M., Hambleton, E. and Maltby, M. (2020), “Chicken hybrid imagery on late Iron Age coinage in northern Gaul and southern England during the Iron Age-Roman transition,” In I. Selsvold and L. Webb (eds.), Beyond the Romans: Posthuman Perspectives in Roman Archaeology. Oxford: Oxbow, pp. 67-77. https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/33475/
4. Details of the impact
We have used our leadership of novel interdisciplinary research to inform public attitudes to the chicken and demonstrate the impact of this globally significant primary food source on food security, zoonotic disease and environmental sustainability. We have created highly stimulating activities and materials to transform teaching practice in the UK, and targeted UN Sustainable Development Goals SDG4 (Quality Education) and SDG5 (Gender Equality).
In the UK we worked with the City of London Academy Southwark (CoLA), to develop a year of activities for Key Stage 3 pupils (11-14 years), [E1a] encompassing science, English and Art, and exploring global history, food politics and ethical consumption. Activities included an ancient DNA workshop, and artistic interpretations of the meat industry, culminating in the students creating a 9m-tall papier-mâché chicken (‘Dinnersaurus Rex’), displayed at the school’s Chicken Fest in 2015 and later at the Natural History Museum, Oxford in 2017 and viewed by approximately 40,000 visitors [E1b].
CoLA’s principal noted: ‘We’re trying to develop our interdisciplinary curriculum at the moment and the Chicken Fest has proven to be our catalyst...This is a school in one of the most deprived parts of London and it really benefits from this involvement, raising aspirations within our community… and in terms of our students looking at… a whole host of different areas they would never have considered, had we not got involved… [This] has inspired our students, enabled them to do… amazing things. It’s been remarkably successful’ [E1a]. Another teacher added that it also resulted in that cohort obtaining the school’s ‘highest ever exam results… [T]he sheer ambition of the project created a sense of excitement amongst the students in the school and they could see that hard work paid off’ [E1c].
We used the ‘Causing a Flap’ project to build on this trailblazing success and extend our UK reach by translating our original research findings into physical and online educational resources for mainstream Key Stages 1-4 pupils, home school and distance learners. Best and Maltby collaborated with educators during the development stage to trial, critique and advance the resources. Based on the feedback, they made the online packs editable, to allow adaptation to different education environments and needs. In December 2018, the suite of resources was made freely accessible via the TES website, a highly regarded UK teaching platform with global reach. By 31st December 2020, the resources had been downloaded 6,921 times [E2a], with peaks coinciding with the March and November 2020 Covid-19 lockdowns and the return to classrooms in September 2020. The resources have had international reach, with downloads across Europe, USA, Africa, Australasia and Asia [E2b]. They have consistently received 5/5 from user reviews, with positive comments on the engaging style and clarity of the content [E2c].
Internationally, we focused on Ethiopia, where our research had highlighted that the strong cultural and social significance of the chicken was unrecognised, and the GCRF project had identified a need for educational resources. In consultation with teachers and officials from the Ministry of Education of Ethiopia, we created physical pre-printed education resources based on our chicken research. These were designed to work with limited classroom space/internet access, expand the representation of women and girls (addressing SDG5), and include images drawn in the traditional Ethiopian style, alongside use of Ethiopian characters and names.
We exported more than 3,500 items, via Link Ethiopia, a charity aimed at transforming lives through improving educational opportunities in the country. They work in partnership with local communities to improve access to quality education for all students, encouraging mutual understanding and respect between different cultures. More than 3,000 students ( average class size 50) in 60 classes at 10 different schools have access to our resources, including reading booklets and posters [E3a]. Link Ethiopia said: ‘We know teaching aids and resources are scarce in the schools we support and it’s a real challenge for teachers to keep large classes of students engaged with only a blackboard, so we were pleased to support the Causing A Flap project…’ [E3a].
‘Often, donated English educational resources are difficult for Ethiopian children to relate to … and quickly become incomprehensible.’ [E3a] By contrast, the use of chickens increased and enhanced learning, as the resources contained ‘narratives and objects that are familiar to the children, to help them engage with what they’re learning.’ The resources have also increased teacher satisfaction: ‘[They] are so pleased to have adequate teaching materials which will help keep children engaged throughout lessons’ [E3a].
The relationships we created have led to ongoing education networks between the UK and Ethiopia, with Link Ethiopia using the developed resources in their work [E3b]. We also changed attitudes to educational resource development by showing how university research can provide multi-disciplinary resources to engage diverse educational bases [E1a].
We used our research to create a wide range of activities and events to engage with more than 100,000 people, including children, older people and vulnerable groups (via over 20,000 event attendees and 80,000 podcast downloads). We transformed perceptions and knowledge of the long, interconnected histories of humans and chickens and the role of chickens in future human and animal health, well-being and environmental sustainability. Later media coverage showed how the project contributed to changing perceptions into our relationship with chickens [E4].
Glastonbury Festival 2014: We hosted a stand in the Green Future Science Tent, which attracted 800 visitors from very diverse backgrounds (e.g. vegan caterers, backyard breeders, sustainable food trust workers and chicken vaccinators). Interactive mapping activities revealed that although most people knew chickens were not native to the UK, they had a wide range of ideas as to where they did originate [E5]. The event was very successful in demonstrating that our work in the past can help understand current cultural issues such as commercial meat and egg production [E5].
Being Human Festival 2014: At the Vindolanda Roman fort and museum, near Hadrian’s Wall, we worked with academic collaborators, partners Practical Poultry magazine, Equal Arts’ (a charity engaging older people and dementia sufferers), and their project HenPower (who use hen keeping to promote health and wellbeing and reduce loneliness), to explain our research to more than 100 visitors. Visitor comments demonstrated that we had enhanced public understanding of the chicken’s significance: ‘[We] explored lots of ideas about food production and animal welfare’. ‘Just starting with chickens led us to [discussing] world poverty, the mental wellbeing of old people’. ‘It makes you realise… how integral they’ve been to so much of human life’. ‘It has important implications for how we consider how chickens are fed, how they’re kept, [their] husbandry’. [E6].
Chicken Comedy Night 2015: We worked closely with comedian Steve Cross and TV personality Kate Humble to create a stand-up comedy event, which formed the climax of the Being Human Festival 2015 and was performed to a full house at the appropriately named Hen and Chickens Theatre Bar, London [E7].
Causing a Flap documentary filmed in 2018: Collaboration with Equal Arts, HenPower and Link Ethiopia allowed us to map our research findings about the ancient social and cultural significance of chickens to the present day, identifying circumstances in which chickens have transformed the lives of some of the most vulnerable members of society (including isolated elderly people, dementia sufferers, underprivileged children and those with learning difficulties). Their positive stories were recorded as a documentary in which participants told their own tales and experience of chicken keeping, and the ‘positive impact’ they had on their health and wellbeing [E8]. The video testimonials also highlighted the importance of chickens to Ethiopian women, linking to our educational resources above, and creating an ongoing path that is promoting positive perceptions of chickens and their importance in modern society.
Gastropod podcast 2018: Best was invited to talk on this critically acclaimed American podcast series, which explores the science and history of the food we eat today. She used the research to increase public awareness about the history of egg production and consumption, and the issues associated with it [E9a]. The episode was downloaded more than 80,000 times in the first six weeks [E9b].
Interactive exhibition at Fishbourne Roman Palace Museum 2017-2018: More than 50,000 people visited Fishbourne during our exhibition, including over 20,000 children on school visits [E10]. The curator noted that exhibition ‘feedback collected from visitors by survey was overwhelmingly positive and anecdotal feedback from our guides was similarly positive’. Additionally, most visitors (over 90%) indicated that they had learned something new [E10]. The curator added: ‘It was a powerful reminder of [the] value [of stored collections], both as an academic resource, but more importantly, as a way to use research to reach out to the public. It was, in every way, a huge success’ [E10].
5. Sources to corroborate the impact
E1a: Scicult Chickens, (2016). Why did the chicken cross the curriculum? [video] Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JfMFmUAuF_4 [Accessed 17 February 2021].
E1b: University of Oxford Natural History Museum, (2018). Annual Review 2016-2017. [online] Oxford: Oxford University Museum of Natural History, p.15. Available at: https://www.oumnh.ox.ac.uk/annual review2016-7 [Accessed 17 February 2021].
E1c: City of London Academy Southwark. (2016). Testimonial, undated.
E2a: TES. (2020). Screenshot showing number of downloads of resources from TES website, 31 December.
E2b: TES. (2020). PDF of TES dashboard, 27 November.
E2c: TES. (2019). DNA and genetic inheritance. [online] Available at: https://www.tes.com/teaching-resource/dna-and-genetic-inheritance-12083359 [Accessed 17 February 2021].
E3a: Link Ethiopia. (2019). Causing a Flap in Education. [online] Available at: https://www.linkethiopia.org/blog/causing-a-flap-in-education/ [Accessed 17 February 2021].
E3b: Link Ethiopia. (2018). Linking and Learning - Angereb School visit to Backwell. [online] Available at: https://www.linkethiopia.org/blog/2018/07/11/angereb-visit-to-backwell/ [Accessed 22 February 2021].
E4: Gorman, J., (2016). Chickens weren't always dinner for humans. The New York Times.
E5: Best, J. (2014). Rise with the crow: AHRC public engagement at Glastonbury Festival - Science in Culture. [online] Available at: https://www.sciculture.ac.uk/rise-with-the-crow-ahrc-public-engagement-at-glastonbury-festival/ [Accessed 17 February 2021].
E6a. Giddins, D., (2015). Being Human - Chicken Nuggets. [video] Available at: https://vimeo.com/115333166 [Accessed 17 February 2021].
E6b. sciculture.ac.uk. (2014). Chicken Nuggets: A History of the World in 100 e.gs. - Science in Culture. [online] Available at: https://www.sciculture.ac.uk/2014/12/16/chicken-nuggets-a-history-of-the-world-in-100-e-gs/ [Accessed 25 February 2021].
E7: Scicult Chickens, (2016). Why did the chicken...? [video] Available at: https://bit.ly/3kqn89U [Accessed 17 February 2021].
E8: Giddins, D. (2020). Causing a Flap. [video] Available at: https://vimeo.com/455270676 Accessed 25 February 2021].
E9a: Gastropod. (2018). The Incredible Egg. [online] Available at: https://gastropod.com/the-incredible-egg/ [Accessed 17 February 2021].
E9b: Gastropod. (2019). Email, 23 February.
E10: Fishbourne Roman Palace. (2019). Testimonial letter, 11 December.
- Submitting institution
- Bournemouth University
- Unit of assessment
- 15 - Archaeology
- Summary impact type
- Cultural
- Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
- No
1. Summary of the impact
Research by Bournemouth University (BU) to revolutionise understandings of Stonehenge and its environs has resulted in:
new interpretations that underpin the creation of engaging presentations in the new visitor centre, which achieved record attendance figures of 1,346,177 people in its first year, and increased amount of time spent by visitors at the site;
economic benefit to English Heritage, which relies on Stonehenge to support more than 400 other sites;
heritage management organisations using BU’s insights to inform discussions on the siting of the proposed A303 tunnel to best preserve the wider archaeological landscape;
an innovative project that used unique access to the site to improve mental wellbeing, with more than 79% of participants reporting a positive response.
2. Underpinning research
Stonehenge is the world’s best known, most intensively studied prehistoric monument, richly deserving of its World Heritage Site (WHS) status. However, at the beginning of the 21st century, academic understanding of the site was fraught with problems and gaps, whilst its presentation to the public lagged far behind the insights emerging from academic research. Over the last 20 years, BU has conducted world-leading research to improve this situation through a sustained relationship with the Stonehenge WHS. Five interconnected projects underpin this case study:
a. Stonehenge WHS Archaeological Research Framework (SRF) (Darvill)
b. Strumble-Preseli Ancient Communities and Environment Study (SPACES) (British Academy, 2010) (Darvill)
c. Stonehenge Riverside Project (SRP) (AHRC funded GBP498,241, 2006–10) (Welham, co-director, with PI, Parker Pearson, UCL)
d. Stones of Stonehenge Project (SoS), 2010-current, (Welham, co-director, with PI, Parker Pearson, UCL).
e. Human Henge, 2016–19, Heritage Lottery Fund, (Darvill, Heaslip in partnership with The Restoration Trust).
The SRF [R1] has guided research in the Stonehenge landscape since its publication in 2005. Despite repeated investigations throughout the 20th century, key relationships between different parts of the monument remained unclear. Permission to excavate inside the circle is seldom granted, and thus new investigations conducted by Darvill and Geoffrey Wainwright (President, Society of Antiquaries of London) [R2] in response to the framework agenda presented a crucial opportunity to improve understanding of the sequence of construction.
Stonehenge can only be fully understood in its wider context – and the SRP looked beyond the stone circle to investigate the surrounding monumental landscape. This work filled important gaps regarding the existence of a processional route through this ‘landscape of the dead’, including the landmark discovery of previously unknown monuments, such as the ‘Bluestonehenge’ stone circle, approximately 1.6km from Stonehenge [R3].
People have often been conspicuous by their absence from the Stonehenge narrative. The recognition of settlement activity and discovery of Neolithic houses at Durrington, contemporary with the Stonehenge sarsens, has provided compelling new insights regarding those who built the monument and given renewed prominence to people in the presentation of the Stonehenge story [R3]. Welham’s contribution focused on mapping, recording and geophysical surveys - components fundamental to the project.
The SPACES and SoS projects operated on an even wider scale, by locating and contextualising the primary source of Stonehenge’s famous bluestones [R4, R5]. They revealed that stone quarrying at Carn Menyn, Carn Goedog and Craig Rhos-y-felin, South Wales had been carried out for thousands of years by the time the bluestones were quarried. The discovery of their source provided new insights into their significance to the people who built Stonehenge. Darvill’s SPACES project also suggested the stones may originally have been associated with the perceived healing power of local waters [R5], and were brought to Stonehenge for that reason, drawing prehistoric visitors to the site throughout the monument’s use.
Darvill and Heaslip combined the ‘Healing Hypothesis’ with further research into the wider role of therapeutic places in the past [R5] in the Human Henge (HH) project, which examined whether a creative exploration of historic landscape could achieve measurable, sustained positive health and wellbeing outcomes for people with mental health conditions. Heaslip, a specialist health professional, assessed the results, using internationally recognised metrics – the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS). In 2019 HH was nominated for a prestigious Shanghai Archaeology Forum Prize.
The integrated approach to the monument as a component of the wider ritual landscape, coupled with Bayesian approaches to radiocarbon dating, has enabled the delineation of a new chronology for the sequence of human activity at Stonehenge. The old three-phase model has now been replaced with a five-phase model of much greater detail and reliability than was previously possible [R6]. This work is critical, as: ‘It is from this firm platform that Stonehenge can begin its new era of communication with the public at large’ [R6, editor].
3. References to the research
All the research papers below were subject to peer-review.
R1: Darvill, T. (2005), Stonehenge World Heritage Site. An archaeological research framework. Bournemouth and London: Bournemouth University & English Heritage. http://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/9689/
R2: Darvill, T. and Wainwright, G. (2009), “Stonehenge Excavations 2008,” Archaeological Journal 89: pp1-19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000358150900002X
R3: Parker Pearson, M., Pollard, J., Richards, C., Thomas, J., Tilley, C. and Welham, K. (2020), Stonehenge for the Ancestors: Part 1. Leiden: Sidestone Press. https://www.sidestone.com/books/stonehenge-for-the-ancestors-part-1 (Copy available.)
R4: Parker Pearson, M., Pollard, J., Richards, C., Welham, K., Casswell, C., French, C., Schlee, D., Shaw, D., Simmons, E., Stanford, A., Bevins, R. and Ixer, R. (2019), “Megalithic quarries for Stonehenge’s bluestones,” Antiquity 93: pp45-62. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2018.111
R5: Heaslip, V., Vahdaninia, M., Hind, M., Darvill, T., Staelens, Y., O' Donoghue, D., Drysdale, L., Lunt, S., Hogg, C., Allfrey, M., Clifton, B. and Sutcliffe, T. (2020), “Locating oneself in the past to influence the present: Impacts of Neolithic landscapes on mental health well-being,” Health & Place, 62:102273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.102273
R6: Darvill, T, Marshall, P, Parker Pearson, M. and Wainwright, G. (2012), “Stonehenge remodelled,” Antiquity 86: pp1021-40. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00048225
4. Details of the impact
In 1997, the facilities at Stonehenge were described as a ‘national disgrace’ in Parliament, and in 2009 the WHS Management Plan called them ‘grossly inadequate’, noting that, without an understanding of the history, origin and context of the monument, visitors could not fully comprehend its significance. In 2011, English Heritage (EH) published its objectives for a new visitor centre as part of the 2010-15 WHS Strategy for Interpretation, Learning and Participation ( English Heritage, 2011). The new centre opened in December 2013 with better interpretation of the stones, improved access to the surrounding landscape, and a coherent, accessible chronology to underpin new displays and provide a clear context for other presentations. BU provided key guidance, data, interpretations and artefacts, comprising:
information for the ‘Wessex Timeline’, a new, large-scale infographic running the length of the visitor centre, presenting the new chronology of Stonehenge;
digital plans for building full-size replicas of Neolithic houses;
text, images, video, models, CGI reconstructions and physical artefacts for the exhibitions, all of which draw on the Wessex Timeline;
updated content for the official Stonehenge website, guidebook, map, audio-tour, display cases, and information panels.
EH credited BU’s research with a key role in the new visitor centre, stating that, as well as enhancing understanding of the monument, it also underpinned approaches to presenting the Stonehenge site and managing the surrounding landscape [E1]. It confirmed that new insights gained from the SPACES and SRP projects have had ‘profound implications’. ‘The SRP… has been instrumental in redirecting attention of the public to the wider landscape… [while] the monuments and settlement at Durrington Walls… introduced a human scale and connection.’ This enabled the new interpretation to answer important questions about the people who built Stonehenge, where they lived and what their lives were like, presenting ‘a much more nuanced and intriguing narrative, which maintains attention on the wider archaeological landscape.’ [E1].
Visitors agree about the significance of BU research: responses to an independent evaluation of the visitor centre in 2014 confirmed 70% of 300 visitors surveyed about the new content [E2] strongly agreed they better understood the dates of the building of Stonehenge, its construction over time, the source of the stones, its place in the landscape, its relationship to the river and other structures and the changes in that landscape. Responses included: ‘[It was] the first time I had the link with the human settlements’ and ‘[I realised] how big the whole area is and the importance of the river’ [E2]. The survey also indicated improved knowledge of the new time sequence, with a further 88% of respondents strongly agreeing with the statement: ‘I have found out that the Stonehenge landscape changed over a 2,500 year-long prehistoric period and includes features from three different periods - before Stonehenge, the time of Stonehenge and after Stonehenge was built.’ [E2].
Throughout the reporting period, repeated, high-profile, national and international media coverage of BU’s research on Stonehenge has driven global public engagement with the monument and new visitor centre. BU research has been featured directly in outlets such as ABC Australia, BBC, Daily Mail, Washington Post and Sky News, with an estimated total global news reach of well in excess of 10,630,000 [E3a]. In 2015 Welham’s bluestone research featured in 383 outlets worldwide [E3b], while in 2018 Darvill appeared in a Discovery Channel documentary on the healing stones, with an estimated audience reach of 2,360,703 unique visitors [E3c]. In 2018-19 Welham’s research was part of an international exhibition: Stonehenge: Beyond the Mystery that began in Belgium (53,045 visitors) and went on to reach audiences in museums across the USA [E3d].
When the new visitor centre opened, visitor numbers immediately increased the following year (2014) by 8% to 1,346,177, and it became the UK’s third most visited paid-for tourist attraction [E4a]. In subsequent years this rise in visitors has continued, peaking at 1,604,248 in 2019 [E4b].
EH recognises that ‘the much-improved visitor experience has enabled us to reach a very significant proportion of British residents and overseas visitors’ and ‘resulted in an increase in the amount of time people spend at Stonehenge’ [E1]. The 2014 Visitor Survey indicates that, after a visit to the new visitor centre, 68% of respondents strongly agree they would like to explore the wider Stonehenge landscape whose importance our research has stressed [E2].
EH also notes that: ‘Visits [to Stonehenge] also have a very significant impact on the local economy of Wiltshire.’ [E1]. To put this in context, Historic England describes the heritage sector as ‘an important source of economic prosperity and growth’, estimating its value to the south west region alone to be GBP2,800,000,000 ( Historic England, 2019), while the specific financial benefits of world heritage sites to the UK (of which Stonehenge is the second most popular in Britain) is estimated at GBP85,000,000 per annum ( Heritage and the Economy, 2019, p.39).
Stonehenge also plays a significant economic role for EH as a whole, and thus, ‘The improved offer underpins the role the site plays in generating income for EH which supports the conservation and public access to hundreds of other sites in England.’ [E1]. This is confirmed by the 2014 Visitor Survey which shows that, after a visit to the new centre incorporating our work, 79% of respondents strongly agree they would like to visit other EH properties [E2].
BU’s agenda-setting research continues to feed into the future management and preservation of the Stonehenge landscape. EH acknowledges that the Stonehenge WHS Archaeological Research Framework produced by Darvill in 2005 ‘continues to frame enquiry’ [E2], and our body of work is a core component of the latest WHS Management Plan [E5]. One of the key priorities in the plan has been to ‘improve the interpretation and enhance the visitor experience of the wider landscape’. This has been underpinned by BU’s SPACES and SRP projects, which demonstrated the importance of taking a broader landscape-based view of the site.
Darvill sits on the A303 Scientific Committee, formed in 2017 to provide specialist advice to the A303 Amesbury to Berwick Down Heritage Monitoring and Advisory Group, comprising EH, Historic England, National Trust and Wiltshire Council [E6a]. Our understanding of the extent and distribution of archaeological features in the wider landscape has thus been instrumental in negotiations with Highways England on the course of the planned tunnel and rerouting of the road [E6a, E6b].
Darvill’s research into the potential healing properties of the Stonehenge bluestones in the past inspired an interest in how this could be used to promote mental wellbeing in the present. Collaboration with researchers at BU interested in marginalised communities, heritage NGOs and mental health charities led to the creation of ‘Human Henge’ (HH), a structured programme of therapeutic activities on the site to improve mental wellbeing. This 10-week programme of activities taking place both in the stone circle and wider landscape was delivered three times between 2016–18 for a total of 35 local participants with chronic mental health problems.
In a WEMWBS-based survey of participants, 79.3% reported a positive impact on their mental health, which increased throughout the programme and also continued a year later (88.2% confirming this) [R5]. Many credited the programme with providing increased optimism and confidence, inner strength and improved interaction with others. Participants specifically referred to feelings of connection with ancestors who had inhabited the site, reconnecting with their community, and engaging with the research: ‘[Darvill’s] knowledge [was] much appreciated.’ [E7].
For some, the programme also provided a better insight into their mental health issues, and improved strategies for managing them. ‘It’s broken down my social anxiety, my understanding of them has opened up… I think coming here and being with people, is breaking down the barriers… you can get trapped up in making the world so small.’ [R5]. ‘As someone who spent two years unable to go out, Human Henge has saved my life.’ [E8].
Participants noted a reconnection to place established through exploring their local area and landscape, one person reporting: ‘[HH] helped me connect with local people socially and local places with happy memories. Feeling more connected with Wiltshire and feeling like I have a place to be/belong in Wiltshire’ [R5]. The WHS agreed that the project ‘promotes the WHS as a whole, not just isolated monuments’ and ‘suggests ways in which people can harness the potential of the WHS landscape to manage their own wellbeing.’ [E9].
HH has demonstrated the contribution archaeological research can make to the wellbeing agenda, the UN’s Sustainable Development Goal 3. Its impacts have been widely shared by opinion and policy makers:
The 2019 HH conference was attended by 80 researchers, practitioners and consultants working across the arts, heritage, wellbeing and inclusion agendas. It was opened by Alex Coulter, the Director of Arts Health South-West (part of National Alliance for Arts, Health and Wellbeing) and the Secretariat of the All-Party Parliamentary Group on the Arts, Health and Wellbeing (APPGAHW, chaired by Ed Vaizey MP).
HH was featured as a case study in the 2019 APPGAHW Round Table on Heritage, Health and Wellbeing [E8].
HH forms part of the evidence used by the Heritage Alliance in its 2020 report: ‘Heritage, Health and Wellbeing’, [E10]. This uses the evidence to make agenda-setting proposals for the heritage, health and care sectors, heritage commissioners, and five policy recommendations for UK government. These include promoting ‘the power of heritage in policy making’ with respect to these agendas, and recommending a ‘joint strategy to promote heritage, culture and the arts as significant non-clinical contributors to the health and wellbeing of the nation’ [E10].
5. Sources to corroborate the impact
E1: English Heritage. (2021). Letter to Kate Welham, 11 January.
E2: Shaw, P. (2014). An Independent Evaluation Of The Interpretive Offer At The Stonehenge Visitor Centre, Three Months After Opening. English Heritage.
E3: E3a: Kantar. (2020). Analytics January 2016 – December 2020.
E3b: BU Press & PR Team. (2015) Email detailing 383 media clips, 11 December.
E3c: Agility PR Media Monitoring. (2020). Discovery Channel: Audience reach.
E3d: Museum, G., (2019). Past Exhibitions - Gallo-Romeins Museum Tongeren. [online] Available at: https://www.galloromeinsmuseum.be/en/exhibitions/voorbij-2 [Accessed 29 January 2021].
E4: E4a: Association of Leading Visitor Attractions. (2021). ALVA: 2014 Visitor Figures. [online] Available at: https://www.alva.org.uk/details.cfm?p=605 [Accessed 8 February 2021].
E4b: Association of Leading Visitor Attractions. (2021). ALVA: 2019 Visitor Figures. [online] Available at: https://www.alva.org.uk/details.cfm?p=610 [Accessed 8 February 2021].
E5: Simmonds, S. and Thomas, B. (2015). Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites World Heritage Site Management Plan 2015. [online] pp. 42, 50, 52-54, 103. Available at: http://www.stonehengeandaveburywhs.org/assets/2015-MANAGEMENT-PLAN_LOW-RES.pdf [Accessed 29 January 2021].
E6: E6a: A303scientificcommittee.org.uk. (2021). ABOUT US - A303scientificcommittee. [online] Available at: http://a303scientificcommittee.org.uk/about-us [Accessed 20 January 2021].
E6b: Hansard, (2018). Stonehenge: Proposed Road Alterations. [online] Available at: https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2018-06-05/debates/308BEB84-061C-40D1-AC59-B69970FFE894/StonehengeProposedRoadAlterations [Accessed 20 January 2021].
E7: Willis, J. (2018). Why And How Does The Human Henge Support Participants Wellbeing? Willis Newson. CONFIDENTIAL
E8: All Party Parliamentary Group on Arts, Health and Wellbeing. (2019). ‘Heritage, Health and Wellbeing Round Table’. Minutes of All Party Parliamentary Group on Arts, Health and Wellbeing meeting 15 July 2019, Committee Room 1, House of Lords.
E9: BU Stonehenge Research Impact Assessment Response Pro Forma, received July 2019.
E10: The Heritage Alliance, (2020). Heritage, Health And Wellbeing. [online] The Heritage Alliance. P. 43. Available at: https://www.theheritagealliance.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Heritage-Alliance-AnnualReport_2020_Online.pdf [Accessed 20 January 2021].