Skip to main

Impact case study database

The impact case study database allows you to browse and search for impact case studies submitted to the REF 2021. Use the search and filters below to find the impact case studies you are looking for.

Search and filter

Filter by

  • The University of Birmingham
   None selected
  • 29 - Classics
   None selected
   None selected
   None selected
   None selected
   None selected
   None selected
Waiting for server
Download currently selected sections for currently selected case studies (spreadsheet) (generating)
Download currently selected case study PDFs (zip) (generating)
Download tags for the currently selected case studies (spreadsheet) (generating)
Currently displaying text from case study section
Showing impact case studies 1 to 2 of 2
Submitting institution
The University of Birmingham
Unit of assessment
29 - Classics
Summary impact type
Cultural
Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
No

1. Summary of the impact

This case study details benefits to national and regional heritage organisations, heritage professionals and a variety of publics in two principal areas. First, changes to policy and management at both site and landscape scales have been implemented through significant in situ protection, specifically through scheduling and landscape management plans, and by continued consultation and knowledge exchange with national and international bodies. Second, changes in public understanding have resulted in pronounced changes to public perception of the issues surrounding wetland archaeology. This was achieved through extensive collaborative work with a range of external bodies, public volunteers and museums, and the media in the UK and Denmark.

2. Underpinning research

The underpinning research centres on wetland and waterlogged archaeology and its exceptional cultural value resulting from the preservation that these environments present. Its importance lies in understanding not just how landscapes and settlements of the wetlands changed but also how people used and perceived these changing environments. This research continues to build on a long history of cross-sector research and engagement led by University of Birmingham academics. A combination of new approaches to the excavation, palaeoecological analysis and digital modelling of this archaeology and landscape has resulted in new knowledge and methodologies.

Key findings (KF) from site-level research have included:

  1. Chapman and Gearey’s excavation of a later Neolithic trackway and platform on Hatfield Moors, South Yorkshire (funded by Historic England and Natural England, R1) resulted in the recognition of the earliest corduroy structure in the UK. Digital modelling of the site within its reconstructed environment highlighted the unique ceremonial architecture of the site.

  2. Gearey and Chapman’s excavation of Iron Age timber alignments within the Waveney valley on the Suffolk/Norfolk border (funded by Historic England and Halcrow/Broadlands Environmental Services Ltd., R2) resulted in the identification of a new category of Iron Age site (including the longest prehistoric post alignment in the country), in addition to the development of new remote sensing approaches for wetlands.

  3. Chapman and Gearey’s research into the Iron Age site of Sutton Common in South Yorkshire (funded by Historic England, R3) included pioneering work on the in situ monitoring of waterlogged deposits (R4), and provided the only extensive excavation of a ‘marsh-fort’, in addition to challenging previous assumptions within wider hillfort studies.

  4. Smith’s palaeoentomological research across an extensive range of sites and deposits resulted in the development of interpretative insect ‘indicator groups’ for a range of archaeological contexts (R5, R6, R7, R8).

This research has led to new insights and methodologies at the landscape scale. This has included the development of a new methodology for the digital modelling of the formation and expansion of wetlands, enabling deeper understanding of the relationship between cultural activity and environmental change. This methodology has now been applied to:

  1. Hatfield Moors and Thorne Moors in Yorkshire, by Chapman and Gearey (funded by Historic England), resulting in the creation of new models of environmental change to contextualise and interpret known sites and inform the future heritage and environmental management of these sites (R1), in addition to a new way of approaching peatlands more broadly. The Wildscapes project (funded by the National Lottery Heritage Fund), a collaboration between the Universities of Plymouth, Cork and Birmingham (Chapman), with numerous non-HEI partners, extends this research across the whole of the Humberhead Levels region.

  2. The landscape context of bog bodies — preserved human remains, often associated with sacrifice in later prehistory, by Chapman and Smith (R9). Key insights from this work in the UK (Lindow Moss) and Denmark (Bjældskovdal and Borremose) include observations relating to accessibility to deposition sites and the implications for Iron Age ceremonial activities, in addition to new methodological guidance (R10).

3. References to the research

R1 Chapman, H.P. and B.R. Gearey. 2013. Modelling archaeology and palaeoenvironments in wetlands: the hidden landscape archaeology of Hatfield and Thorne Moors, eastern England. Oxford: Oxbow. ISBN: 9781782971740

R2 Gearey, B.R., H.P. Chapman and A.J. Howard. 2016. Down by the river: archaeological, palaeoenvironmental and geoarchaeological investigations of the Suffolk river valleys. Oxford: Oxbow. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvh1dtkq

R3 Van de Noort, R., H. Chapman and J. Collis. 2007. Sutton Common. The excavation of an Iron Age ‘marsh-fort’. York: Council for British Archaeology. DOI: 10.5284/1081803

R4 Wagstaff, S., S. Bishop, J. Cheetham, A. Davis, J. Williams, Z. Outram, D. Priddy and H. Chapman. 2016. Hydrological modelling water-level changes in an area of archaeological significance: a case study from Flag Fen, Cambridgeshire, UK. Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites 18(1–3): 156–169. DOI: 10.1080/13505033.2016.1182753

R5 Smith, D.N. 2012. Insects in the city. Oxford: Oxbow Books. ISBN: 9781407309866

R6 Smith, D.N., G. Hill and H.K. Kenward. 2019. The development of late-Holocene farmed landscapes: analysis of insect assemblages using a multi-period dataset. The Holocene 29: 45–63. DOI: 10.1177%2F0959683618804645

R7 Smith, D.N. 2013. Defining an ‘indicator package’ to allow identification of ‘cess pits’ in the archaeological record. Journal of Archaeological Science 40: 526–43. DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2012.06.014

R8 Smith, D.N., F. Hill, H.K. Kenward and E. Allison. 2020. Development of synathropic beetle faunas over the last 9000 years in the British Isles. Journal of Archaeological Science 115: 105075 ( epub ahead of publication). DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2020.105075

R9 Chapman, H. 2015. The landscape archaeology of bog bodies. Journal of Wetland Archaeology 15(1): 109–121. DOI: 10.1080/14732971.2015.1112592

R10 Chapman, H., R. van Beek, B. Gearey, B. Jennings, D. Smith, N.H. Nielsen and Z. Zein Elabdin. 2020. Bog bodies in context: developing a best practice approach. European Journal of Archaeology 23(2): 227–249 (published online 29 August 2019). DOI: 10.1017/eaa.2019.54

4. Details of the impact

Impacts centre around two principal strands, changes to policy and management and changes in public understanding of wetland archaeology.

  1. Changes to policy and management of wetland, peatland and waterlogged heritage sites

Taken together the impacts are changes to the heritage management of a number of fragile archaeological sites and landscapes, with the following specific impacts:

  • That Hatfield Trackway has been recognised as an important and unique ceremonial centre arising directly from Chapman’s research and subsequent recommendations made to Historic England and Natural England (R1, KF1). This recognition is shown by receipt of new statutory protection as a Scheduled Ancient Monument in 2017 (S1). Further, it is now listed on the ‘Heritage at Risk’ register (S1).

  • The need for long-term preservation through engineered water management in situ (R1, R3) has been recognised and delivered. This is evidenced by the adoption of new site management policies for the Neolithic trackway and platform by Natural England on Hatfield Moors (R1) and at the Iron Age marsh-fort site of Sutton Common (S2), which included the expansion of the Water Level Management Plan for neighbouring Shirley Pool (S3) (KF1, KF3). These research outcomes, in addition to those from the Waveney valley, led to Chapman being commissioned by Historic England in 2015 to advise on the potential for in situ hydrological preservation and management at the Bronze Age site of Flag Fen, Cambridgeshire (R4; S4, S5).

  • Changes to professional practice have been achieved through cross-sector discussions led by Smith with HEIs, Historic England advisors and commercial environmental archaeologists. These discussions have highlighted a growing skills shortage in wetland archaeology. To address this shortage, Smith engaged in a series of knowledge transfer and skill development training, including on-site training to staff of Vest-Himmerlands Museum (Denmark), and hosting an Association for Environmental Archaeology Conference on pests of society, incorporating a one-day archaeobotany workshop (the former attended by 84 and the latter by 27, including 7 as CPD training). Feedback highlighted the benefit of this training and evidenced the need for continuing CPD for curatorial and heritage providers (S6). One issue identified was a lack of standardised criteria for the professional analysis of mineralised material leading to the production of the e-book resource Mineralised Plant and Invertebrate Remains (English Heritage funded, S7) (KF4).

  • The model of wetland evolution of Hatfield and Thorne Moors (R1) was the first of its kind and has been used as an exemplar to strengthen the advice to practitioners and heritage agencies on preservation strategies for wetland archaeology with resulting models available both regionally (South Yorkshire Archaeology Service) and nationally (Historic England, S5) (KF1, KF5). The application of these models for other sectors, such as addressing the challenges of climate change, is now being considered by Natural England. In 2017, Chapman consulted on the IUCN draft plan for peatland heritage that acknowledges the importance of archaeology within their new vision and strategy (S8), impacting on UK national policy regarding wetland archaeology as recognised in A Secure Peatland Future (2016) (S8). This has led to continued engagement with the IUCN policy statements on peatland heritage for over a decade (Gearey et al. 2010).

  1. Changes in public understanding of wetland archaeology

The impact of our research on public understanding is demonstrated by:

  • Public interest and engagement in research have been stimulated through changes in the ways public bodies engage audiences, including through the enhancement of displays and exhibitions by museums and visitors’ centres. Natural England chose to showcase our research on the Neolithic trackway and platform (R1) as the central theme for the opening of the new visitors’ centre on Hatfield Moors, incorporating research into displays and information boards on site, (S1) (KF1). The opening itself attracted over 100 community visitors to a remote location. The research on the post-alignment at Beccles resulted in an ongoing display in Beccles Museum and the commissioning of an on-site information board outlining both the process and outcomes of the research to the general public (S5). Our findings have refocused bog body research onto their associated landscapes (KF6). This is feeding into a new permanent exhibition being developed by the internationally significant Museum Silkeborg (Denmark) (S9).

  • The research on Hatfield and Thorne Moors (R1) has resulted in the establishment of new projects with public groups. This resulted in significant changes in public awareness and understanding for participating volunteers within a marginalised area (the ward and large parts of the wider local authority are in the top two deciles for most deprived areas in the UK ( Gov Indices of Deprivation 2019). This area has one of the lowest levels of GCSE success, and engagement with Higher Education, by both young people and adults (as defined by the Office for Students). Because of our research, Natural England and the Isle of Axholme and Hatfield Chase Landscape Partnership invited Chapman to lead a new community project focused on the creation of a full-scale reconstruction of the archaeological site which was opened on 20 July 2019 (S1). With a core group of 20 volunteers, the feedback has evidenced significant changes in individuals’ understanding. Volunteers described the experience as “informative, stimulating and inspirational”, and as a “fantastic opportunity which has enabled me to re-think about key concepts of the Neolithic period, how they connected with their landscape, how and why they constructed the trackway and their cultural heritage”. Preconceived understandings changed through the experimental work, with volunteers saying that they were “surprised how well the flint axes cut the trees”. The success of this project has led to an additional year’s funding from the National Lottery Heritage Fund for a new Neolithic-themed reconstruction project with Natural England that will complement the trackway, including a later Neolithic house near the visitors’ centre.

  • A change in the nature of public awareness and the ability of the public to make informed decisions about research into wetlands has resulted from the excavations of the trackway on Hatfield Moors and the subsequent establishment of the collaborative Wildscapes project on the Humberhead levels (e.g., R1, KF1, KF5). Events have centred on public engagement with local communities, heritage organisations and nature conservation groups (including project partners Thorne and Hatfield Moors Conservation Forum and the Isle of Axholme and Hatfield Chase Landscape Partnership). This has raised awareness of the importance of these archaeological sites and landscapes to the wider community. Activities have included collaborative fieldwork and CPD training for volunteers, three public outreach events for over 150 members and have resulted in significant volunteer participation in a range of projects (amounting to over 1000 volunteer hours annually). Volunteers wrote blogs outlining their experience and CPD training resulted in employment within the sector for one volunteer and enrolment on a degree programme by another. The nature of the collaborative methods of the Wildscapes project was outlined in The Conversation, which was subsequently redistributed via Yahoo! News and The Independent, and other media (S10).

  • Increased international public understanding and awareness of wetland archaeology was achieved by extensive media reach consisting of expert contributions to television productions focusing on Chapman and Smith’s research into the environmental archaeology of bog bodies (S10, KF6). In addition to reaching international audiences, this also demonstrates the economic impact of the work through the commissioning and re-selling of these programmes. Examples have included PBS’s Ghosts of murdered kings and the Smithsonian Channel’s Secrets: Season 4, Episode 7: Bog Bodies. As a direct result of our research into the landscape archaeology of bog bodies in the UK and Denmark (e.g., R9), a US programme, Mummies Unwrapped, was developed for the Discovery Channel that focuses on our new approach and key findings.

5. Sources to corroborate the impact

S1 Hatfield Moors/Neolithic Trackway evidence pack, including a) Scheduling of the Neolithic Trackway and Platform, Hatfield Moors, b) Inclusion of Neolithic Trackway and Platform on Heritage at Risk register, c) IoAHC Trackway Reconstruction Report to National Lottery Heritage Fund. S2 Management of Sutton Common, South Yorkshire, by the Carstairs Countryside Trust. S3 Water Level Management Plan for Shirley Pool, adjacent to Sutton Common. S4 Flag Fen hydrological management report (referencing Chapman’s contribution). S5 Testimonial from Historic England (Inspector of Ancient Monuments for Norfolk, Suffolk and Bedfordshire, Historic England). S6 Testimonial from Historic England (Head of Environmental Studies, Historic England). S7 Caruthers, W. and Smith, D.N. 2019. A photographic guide to the identification of mineralised plant and invertebrate remains from archaeological deposits — a guide for non-specialists, available via the Historic England website (over 500 downloads). S8 IUCN draft ‘ A secure peatland future – a vision and strategy for the protection, restoration and sustainable management of UK peatlands’ which references research undertaken at the University of Birmingham (Gearey, B., N. Bermingham, H. Chapman, D. Charman, W. Fletcher, R. Fyfe, J. Quatermaine and R. Van de Noort. 2010. Peatlands and the historic environment: Scientific Review. English Heritage and International Union for the Conservation of Nature, commissioned by IUCN UK Peatland Programme’s Commission of Inquiry into Peatland Restoration). S9 Testimonial from Silkeborg Museum. S10 Media coverage: The Conversation Bogs are unique records of history – here’s why ; For peat’s sake, The Independent Daily Edition, Main, p. 41, 13/09/18 . Television programmes: PBS, Ghosts of murdered kings, first broadcast 29/01/14 in the US; Smithsonian Channel’s Secrets: Season 4, Episode 7: Bog Bodies, first broadcast 05/06/17 in the US; Smithsonian Channel’s Mystic Britain, first broadcast 14/05/19; Discovery Channel’s Mummies Unwrapped, episode 6, The Trail of the Murdered Mummies, first broadcast 09/10/19.

Submitting institution
The University of Birmingham
Unit of assessment
29 - Classics
Summary impact type
Cultural
Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
No

1. Summary of the impact

Our research projects within the Stonehenge World Heritage Site (WHS) area have led to four significant and far-reaching impacts, transforming how the Stonehenge landscape is managed, understood and presented. Firstly, the new frameworks of knowledge and understanding of the WHS that we have established have impacted on planning and policy, particularly in the context of the A303 road tunnel scheme, by changing the knowledge base upon which decisions are made. Secondly, this transformed knowledge base has strongly impacted upon the heritage management of the WHS. Thirdly, there have been significant changes to the heritage presentation of the Stonehenge landscape, onsite, nationally and internationally. Fourthly, there has been global impact on public understanding of Stonehenge and the use of science in archaeology.

2. Underpinning research

The research underpinning this case study consists of two large-scale internationally significant collaborative fieldwork projects led by the University of Birmingham. These integrated long-standing research activities in the Stonehenge landscape (since the 1990s) with pioneering work in the development and application of novel digital and geophysical methods. The results of these projects have far surpassed the research objectives and priorities concerning geophysical survey identified in the Stonehenge World Heritage Site Research Framework (2005) and have established a new foundation for all future archaeological investigation within the WHS .

The Stonehenge Hidden Landscapes Project (SHLP), 2010–2020, is the largest archaeological geophysical survey ever undertaken (15km²), using multiple state-of-the-art prospection technologies (O1, O2, O3). The SHLP, led by the University of Birmingham as one of a series of investigations across Europe by the Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Archaeological Prospection and Virtual Archaeology consortium, has resulted in major discoveries that change fundamentally our knowledge and understanding of the Stonehenge landscape (O1, O3, O4).

The Stonehenge Landscape EMI Project (SLEP), 2016–2020, is a University of Birmingham/ Ghent University collaboration, using boreholes and trench excavation (O5) to evaluate large-scale Electro-Magnetic Induction (EMI) prospection data covering 3km² of the WHS (O6).

Key findings from this research comprise:

RF1: New approaches to the analysis and categorisation of geophysical data in relation to archaeological and non-archaeological features in chalkland landscapes (O1, O2, O3) have resulted from the innovative integration of very large-scale automated and motorised archaeological prospection techniques by the SHLP, subsequent innovation of multi-receiver EMI methods (O6), and ground-truthing in the course of the SLEP (O5).

RF2: The discovery of over 30 previously unknown prehistoric monuments, some in areas once thought to be empty spaces (O1, O3), including a vast Late Neolithic timber monument beneath Durrington Walls super-henge (O3) challenge current understandings of the Neolithic ceremonial landscape and establish new frameworks for its investigation. The Durrington Walls findings, for example, led to an award-winning excavation in collaboration with Stonehenge Riverside Project.

RF3: The discovery of an unparalleled array of massive Neolithic pits, each c.20 m across, encircling Durrington Walls super-henge in an arrangement 2.2 km in diameter (O4), has revealed an entirely new kind of spatial structuring of monuments and practices with profound implications for how the Stonehenge landscape was configured and changed over time.

RF4: Transformative understanding of the Stonehenge landscape through the documentation of thousands of previously unidentified anthropogenic and natural features. These include two massive pits within the Great Cursus that are aligned on the solstitial axis in relation to the Heel Stone (O1), with major implications for future interpretations of Stonehenge itself.

RF5: The first characterisation of Pleistocene and Early Holocene geomorphological processes in the formation of the pre-Stonehenge landscape, leading to a new understanding of the early environmental context before and during earliest human occupation (O6).

RF6: New evidence for the reoccupation of the post-glacial Stonehenge landscape, including the discovery of the largest Early Mesolithic dug feature in northwest Europe (O5).

3. References to the research

(bold denotes University of Birmingham staff at time of publication)

O1: Gaffney, C., V. Gaffney, W. Neubauer, E. Baldwin, H. Chapman, P. Garwood, H. Moulden, T. Sparrow, R. Bates, K. Löcker, A. Hinterleitner, I. Trinks, E. Nau, T. Zitz, S. Floery, G. Verhoeven and M. Doneus. 2012. The Stonehenge Hidden Landscapes Project. Archaeological Prospection, 19(2): 147–55. DOI: 10.1002/arp.1422

O2: Gaffney, V., C. Gaffney, P. Garwood, W. Neubauer, H. Chapman, K. Löcker and E. Baldwin. 2013. Stonehenge Hidden Landscapes Project: geophysical investigation and landscape mapping of the Stonehenge World Heritage Site, in W. Neubauer, I. Trinks, R.B. Salisbury and C. Einwögerer (eds), Archaeological Prospection. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Archaeological Prospection, 19–23 (Wien: Verl. der Österr. Akad.d.Wiss).

O3: Gaffney, V., W. Neubauer, P. Garwood, C. Gaffney, K. Löcker, R. Bates, P. De Smedt, E. Baldwin, H. Chapman, A. Hinterleitner, M. Wallner, R. Rilzweiser, E. Nau, J. Kainz, P. Schneidhofer, G. Zotti and A. Lugmayer. 2018. Durrington Walls and the Stonehenge Hidden Landscape Project 2010–2016, Archaeological Prospection, 25(3): 255–69. DOI: 10.1002/arp.1707

O4: Gaffney, V., E. Baldwin, M. Bates, C.R. Bates, C. Gaffney, D. Hamilton, T. Kinnaird, W. Neubauer, R. Yorston, R. Allaby, H. Chapman, P. Garwood, K. Löcker, T. Sparrow, I. Trinks and M. Wallner. 2020: A massive, Late Neolithic pit structure associated with Durrington Walls Henge, Internet Archaeology, 55.

O5: De Smedt, P., P. Garwood and H. Chapman. 2018: Stonehenge EMI Landscape Project Geoarchaeological Investigations at Stonehenge, July 2017. Interim report for The National Trust and Wiltshire County Archaeology Service (PDF available on request)

O6: De Smedt, P., M. Van Meirvenne, T. Saey, E. Baldwin, C. Gaffney and V. Gaffney. 2014. Unveiling the prehistoric landscape at Stonehenge through multi-receiver EMI. Journal of Archaeological Science, 50: 16–23. DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2014.06.020

4. Details of the impact

4.1 Changes to policy and planning of heritage sites

Our work has established new baselines for making planning decisions within the World Heritage Site (WHS) at a time when the Stonehenge landscape is facing extensive policy and planning challenges relating to major infrastructure developments. The identification of over 30 previously unknown ceremonial and funerary monuments (RF2), the discovery of an array of massive pits encircling Durrington Walls super-henge (RF3), and discoveries of thousands of other archaeological features in the course of the SHL and SLE projects have fundamentally altered the way that we understand the Stonehenge landscape, including areas previously perceived to be ‘empty spaces’. Together, these define new frameworks of knowledge and understanding for making planning decisions within the WHS. The joint World Heritage Committee/ICOMOS (International Council on Monuments and Sites) advisory mission report on the WHS explicitly recognises the significant contribution of the research findings (RF2, RF4) to its baseline understanding, in addition to technical and methodological approaches (RF1) now considered essential to future planning and development-related field investigation (E1).

This fundamental shift in understanding has changed the knowledge base for decision-making relating to the current A303 tunnel scheme through its planning stages (2017–present). Highways England purchased SHLP research data in advance of publication for intensive use in developing the archaeological evaluation and mitigation strategies for the scheme (referenced, for example, in their Heritage Impact Assessment; E2). A written submission from the Consortium of Archaeologists (including Garwood) contributing to the A303 road scheme public consultation was mentioned in parliamentary debate (E3), and the significance of the research findings has resulted in Garwood making expert contributions to the A303 Examination process that have informed and influenced a range of stakeholder bodies. These include the A303 Heritage Management Advisory Group, Highways England, Wiltshire County Archaeology Service, and the A303 Road Scheme Examination Authority (E4).

Our further intervention in the A303 road scheme decision process in June 2020 led directly to the Secretary of State for Transport granting a four-month postponement and additional consultation period for all Interested Parties (E5). This was in response to a written submission from the Consortium of Archaeologists, based on a statement by Garwood concerning the significance of the discovery of the massive pits encircling Durrington Walls super-henge (RF3). This has resulted in a multiplicity of responses from all parties connected with the A303 scheme and its examination, and recognition that understanding of the Stonehenge landscape has changed as a consequence of the latest SHLP discoveries (e.g., Historic England’s submission to the Secretary of State, August 2020: E5).

4.2 Changes to heritage management

Significant changes in the heritage management of the WHS have resulted from the major advances in understanding that the SHLP and SLEP have produced, with respect both to the character and distribution of known and new monuments (RF2, RF3, RF4) and new information regarding the Pleistocene and early post-glacial landscape (RF5, RF6). SHLP results (RF2, RF4) have been used “to improve understanding and to inform management initiatives” within the WHS, as is highlighted in the current Site Management Plan (E6, p. 42). The importance of the research to this change was acknowledged in the current WHS Research Framework as “revealing a wealth of previously unknown sites via remote sensing and geophysical survey” (E7, p. 4). The effectiveness of new methods pioneered by the SHLP (motorised survey and multi-sensor investigation; RF1), demonstrated by project findings (RF2, RF4, RF6), resulted in new methodological approaches to non-invasive survey and the establishment of a new Remote Sensing Group by the National Trust (E8), Europe’s largest heritage conservation charity and one of the largest landowners in the UK.

The significance of the findings for heritage management strategies within the WHS have also been recognised by the Avebury and Stonehenge Archaeological and Historical Research Group (ASAHRG), who support the delivery of the Heritage Management Plan. New monuments and additions to previously known monuments (RF2, RF4) have fed into heritage databases used to inform the management of the landscape, particularly in relation to planning. This has included a large number of new entries in the Historic Environment Record, maintained by the Wiltshire County Archaeology Service and the register of Scheduled Ancient Monuments, maintained by Historic England (E9).

4.3 Changes to heritage presentation

Representations of Stonehenge and the wider WHS have changed (E10), both in the UK and overseas, as a result of the research findings of the SHL and SLE projects (RF2, RF4, RF5, RF6). The most recent Stonehenge guidebook edition (2017; published in eight languages), for example, includes the Durrington Walls super-henge discoveries, and the large-screen landscape film in the Stonehenge Visitor Centre permanent exhibition shows results of SHLP surveys more widely (such as the new henge monument discovered under the Amesbury 50 round barrow). Partly on this basis, and also as a result of several talks at the Visitor Centre by Garwood, Chapman, and other members of the SHL and SLE project teams, staff from the National Trust and English Heritage, in addition to volunteer guides, now present a revised and enriched interpretation of the landscape for visitors, reflecting the discoveries of new monuments and new knowledge regarding the Stonehenge prehistoric landscape (E10).

Significant heritage presentation reach is also evident in exhibitions and displays both in the UK and Austria. A major SHLP-centred museum exhibition ran for 9 months in 2017 at the MAMUZ museum in Mistelbach, Austria, an institution hosting around 70,000 visitors annually. Reach was further extended through a SHLP stand at the Royal Society Summer Science Exhibition in 2015, where hundreds of attendees completed a simulation game relating to the cultural heritage of the Stonehenge landscape, focusing on prehistoric funerary practices and monuments.

4.4 Changes to public understanding of the Stonehenge landscape

Changed public understandings of how innovations in geophysical methods have led to new insights into the past (RF1) and dramatic new knowledge of the Stonehenge landscape (RF2–6) have taken place as a result of intense media interest in the SHLP and other kinds of public and institutional engagement through both the SHLP and SLEP. These impacts are evident both in terms of the exceptional international reach of the SHLP results and in the ways that popular narratives of Stonehenge and its landscape setting have changed at Stonehenge itself (E10) and through broadcast media. In particular, a two-part Emmy-nominated mini-series, Operation Stonehenge, focusing directly on the results of the SHLP (RF2, RF4), was first broadcast on BBC2 in 2014 (2.27m viewers for ep.1; 1.82m for ep.2) and simultaneously on ORF2 in Austria. The series has been re-broadcast three times in the UK and re-sold in at least 15 other countries, demonstrating economic impact in addition to reach. Other documentaries that have disseminated project results include National Geographic’s The Story of God, with Morgan Freeman (season 1, ep.3), and Channel 5’s Beneath Britain (ep.1: Stonehenge).

The significant international reach of our research is further evident in television, print and online news media (e.g., BBC News, Sky News, The Times, Telegraph, Guardian, The Economist, USA Today, Washington Post, El Pais, Wiener Zeitung, Augsburger Allgemeine, NRC Handelsblad). Just one press conference in London in September 2015, concerned with major discoveries at Durrington Walls super-henge, generated news coverage in at least 15 countries with audiences and readerships of over 30 million people. The SHLP has also featured in a range of special interest television programmes, magazines and blogs (e.g., BBC Countryfile, British Archaeology, Current Archaeology, Scientific American, Bild der Wissenschaft, EOS Magazine, ZME Science, LiveScience.com, The Geological Society blog). Notably, the collaborative work at Durrington Walls (RF2) was voted Research Project of the Year 2017 by readers of Current Archaeology, the UK’s only independent archaeology magazine with a readership of over 45,000.

5. Sources to corroborate the impact

E1: World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS 2015: Report On The Joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS Advisory Mission To Stonehenge, Avebury And Associated Sites (downloadable from: under Mission Report 2015; specifically pages 14,18)

E2: Highways Agency 2018: A303 Amesbury to Berwick Down TR010025. 6.3 Environmental Statement Appendices, Appendix 6.1 Heritage Impact Assessment)

E3: Hansard: Commons debate 5/6/2018; Stonehenge: proposed road alterations

E4: Impact on the A303 road scheme Examination process can be seen in the following sequence of linked/inter-referenced Examination documents:

(1) Garwood written and oral submissions to the Examination Authority (ExA), May/June 2019: accessible using the following filter – ‘Paul Garwood’

(2) ExAs verbal questions relating to Garwood submissions during the Cultural Heritage (CH) Hearing on 5/06/2019 (pm)

(3) Highways England response

(4) ExA’s Questions stemming from CH Hearings (CH2 & LV2), referencing Garwood and Consortium of Archaeologists

E5: Impact on the Department for Transport’s National Infrastructure A303 road scheme decision process can be seen in the following sequence of linked documents (June–August 2020):

(1) Consortium of Archaeologists submission to the Secretary of State for Transport, June 2020:

(2) Written Ministerial Statement to Parliament, setting a new deadline for the A303 scheme planning application decision

(3) Secretary of State for Transport request for comments and further information (second A303 scheme consultation)

(4) Historic England 2020: Submission on Behalf of the Historic Buildings and Monuments Commission for England (Historic England):

E6: Simmonds, S. and B. Thomas. 2015: Stonehenge and Avebury World Heritage Site Management Plan 2015

E7: Leivers, M. and A. Powell. 2016: A Research Framework for the Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites World Heritage Site: research agenda and strategy

E8: Testimonial from the Head of Archaeology for The National Trust

E9: Example Historic Environment Record

E10: Testimonial from English Heritage Senior Properties Historian, Stonehenge

Showing impact case studies 1 to 2 of 2

Filter by higher education institution

UK regions
Select one or more of the following higher education institutions and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No higher education institutions found.
Institutions

Filter by unit of assessment

Main panels
Select one or more of the following units of assessment and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No unit of assessments found.
Units of assessment

Filter by continued case study

Select one or more of the following states and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.

Filter by summary impact type

Select one or more of the following summary impact types and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.

Filter by impact UK location

UK Countries
Select one or more of the following UK locations and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No UK locations found.
Impact UK locations

Filter by impact global location

Continents
Select one or more of the following global locations and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No global locations found.
Impact global locations

Filter by underpinning research subject

Subject areas
Select one or more of the following underpinning research subjects and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No subjects found.
Underpinning research subjects