Impact case study database
Search and filter
Filter by
- Manchester Metropolitan University
- 32 - Art and Design: History, Practice and Theory
- Submitting institution
- Manchester Metropolitan University
- Unit of assessment
- 32 - Art and Design: History, Practice and Theory
- Summary impact type
- Societal
- Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
- No
1. Summary of the impact
The CPU Lab develops system-level approaches and computational models to assess implications of disruptive technologies in urban transformation to inform ‘ex-ante’ strategic policy formulation. In collaboration with public bodies and civic leaders, the Lab utilises technologically advanced data modelling and simulation to understand and explore urban transformation, enhance the ability of policy makers to undertake data-led smart city planning, and co-create citizen choice for future mobility strategies. Funded collaborations with partners in the North West have shaped strategic policy formulation that 1) informed the development of Manchester’s digital strategy; 2) incorporated IoT data in Smart City mobility planning; 3) integrated Connected Autonomous Vehicles into TfGM's Future Mobility Strategy; and 4) guided the sustainability agenda of one of the largest regeneration projects in the UK (the Northern Gateway Strategic Regeneration Programme) through new forms of technology-driven architectural design practice via CPU-Ai. Supported by an interdisciplinary network in Brazil, China, Japan and the UK, the Lab ultimately co-produces intelligent decision making towards sustainable and liveable cities.
2. Underpinning research
Established by Hyde and Sengupta, Complexity Planning and Urbanism (CPU) encompasses the CPU-Lab, an externally funded research laboratory, and the linked CPU-Ai Master of Architecture Atelier. Based in Manchester School of Architecture (8th in QS World Rankings, 2020), the Lab explores urban transformation through the development of innovative digital tools based on complexity theory. Complexity theory allows simulation of, and experimentation with, previously impracticable temporal urban phenomena. Sengupta has developed a body of knowledge in urban studies aimed at understanding real-world phenomena characterised by temporal change, unpredictability, adaptation and evolution [1]. By synthesising multiple concepts and terminology from the complexity sciences into an effective conceptual framework for the urban context, Sengupta establishes insight through methodological experimentation thereby expanding the frontier of the field [2]. Research identifies patterns and mechanisms of change, linking cities and diverse socio-technical and social-ecological systems. Through CPU-Ai it also involves the design of new forms of intervention towards sustainable future cities. The research impacts on the co-evolution of governance and design practice in relation to Future Cities; Smart Cities; the Internet of Things (IoT); agile governance and cities as complex adaptive systems.
The EU H2020 funded (EUR22,000,000) Synchronicity project elucidates the pitfalls of technological surveillance, control, exclusion and corporate control over private data, while exploring new models of agile governance enabled new developments in urban ICT, Big Data and an urban Internet of Things. Sengupta’s underlying research examines the potential for ICT technologies to contribute towards new processes of participation and co-evolution supporting citizen agency in cities [3].
Future possibilities of Connected Autonomous Vehicle (CAV) integration into cities is a particular research focus through computer simulation and computational discourse analysis based on socio-technical transitions and emergence. Alternative trajectories and related impacts of new mobility services enabled by CAVs are examined in terms of advantages and disadvantages to different stakeholders (government, citizens, mobility service providers). The Innovate UK funded Synergy project (GBP5,000,000) has enabled Solomou, Zigure and Sengupta to determine potential impact of CAVs on cities [4] and has contributed directly to Greater Manchester’s (GM) strategic transport policies.
With the growth of ICT technologies and multi-player online games, urban planning and future city research has seen an increasing interest in urban games for citizen participation and engagement. However, there is a growing critique on (i) engagement based on the limited game design experience of ‘serious game’ designers; (ii) the growth of GIS embedded Location-Based Mobile Games (LBMG) blurring distinctions between virtual and ‘real’ urban space and creating a more fluid ’hybrid reality’. The complexity paradigm informed research by Sengupta, Tantoush and Cheung into the LBMG Ingress (over 20 million global players) resulted in the first published research which pioneers a new methodology cross-referencing Mechanics-Dynamics-Aesthetics analysis (game studies) and a hybrid realities theoretical framework (urban studies) to identify key mechanisms affecting gameplay, leading to altered practices in the city [5].
Historic urban planning and spatial design practices have limitations when addressing complex spatio-temporal aspects of our cities. Research on methods to address urban transformations is evidenced through collaboration with the Association of European Schools of Planning (AESOP), the International Federation for Housing and Planning (IFHP), the European Council of Spatial Planners and the International Society for City and Regional Planners. Led by Sengupta, the findings [6] demonstrate the development and potential use of non-deterministic computational modelling (BBB Generator) in simulating urban territories (Bromley by Bow, London) in states of rapid change to comprehend and test the possibilities of spatial and policy interventions. The digital tool introduced young planners to complex systems and digital tool-based approaches in the Third European Urban Summer School: Times of Scarcity, London.
3. References to the research
Sengupta, U., 2017. 'Complexity Theory: The urban is a complex adaptive process'. In Iossifova, D., Doll, C. and Gasparatos, A. (eds.) Defining the Urban, Routledge. ISBN 9781472449528
Sengupta, U., Rauws, W., De Roo, G., 2016. 'Planning and Complexity: Engaging with temporal dynamics, uncertainty and complex adaptive systems', Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 43(6):970-974. In Sengupta, U., Rauws, W., De Roo, G. (eds.) 2016, ‘Planning and Complexity’ , Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 2016, Vol. 43(6). https://doi.org/10.1177/0265813516675872
Sengupta, U., 2017. ‘ICT, Open Data and the Internet of Things: Potential future trajectories in urban planning'. In De Roo, G., Yamu, C., Dewisch, O. and Poplin, A. (eds.) The Virtual and the Real in Planning and Urban Design: Perspectives, Practices and Applications, Routledge. ISBN 9780367208509
Solomou, S., Zigure, S., Sengupta, U. et al. 2018-20. Synergy – Connected Autonomous Vehicles selected reports. D7.2 Discourse Analysis Report: Autonomous Vehicle Concerns; D7.3 & D7.4 Urban Simulation: Resource Competition and Service Performance Model.
Sengupta, U., Tantoush, M., Bassanino, M., & Cheung, E. (2020). The Hybrid Space of Collaborative Location-Based Mobile Games and the City: A Case Study of Ingress. Urban Planning, 5(4), 358-370. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.17645/up.v5i4.3487
Sengupta, U., Cheung, E., 2013. ‘Acknowledging Complexity in Continuous Urban Change‘. In Iossifova, D. ed. Architecture and Planning in Times of Scarcity: Reclaiming the Possibility of Making the City, p. 221-229. Softgrid Limited in association with AESOP & IFHP.
Funding (full project values):
G1. ESRC Strategic Network: Data & Cities as Complex Adaptive Systems DACAS GBP100,799
G2. EU H2020 funded project Synchronicity EUR22,000,000
G3. Innovate UK funded project Synergy GBP5,000,000
G4. Innovate UK funded project CityVerve GBP16,000,000
4. Details of the impact
Drawing on the complexity sciences as a cross-disciplinary theoretical base for its research, the CPU-Lab harnesses the potential of computational modelling to explore the impact of disruptive technologies in urban transformation, Smart Cities and Future Cities. The research has direct impact on urban policy makers at the strategic policy formulation stage (ex-ante) and innovative design practitioners, working towards more sustainable and liveable future cities.
A complexity approach to smart and sustainable cities of the future: As founding members of the ESRC-funded Data and Cities as Complex Adaptive Systems (DACAS) strategic network (GBP100,799) with the University of Tokyo, Imperial College London, University of Aberdeen, Wuhan University, University of Sao Paulo and University of Manchester, the Lab has generated agenda-setting impact on researchers and policy makers for sustainable development through promotion of a transdisciplinary approach to urban transformations. DACAS has established enduring connectivity with public bodies and civic leaders including Manchester City Council (MCC), RIBA, Future Cities Catapult (now CPC), Transport for Greater Manchester (TfGM) and government stakeholders in Brazil, China and Japan. As one of the most respected global policy brief publishers on issues of sustainability, collaboration with the United Nations – Institute of Advanced Studies led to the production of the international policy brief ‘Sustainable Smart Cities: Applying Complexity Science to Achieve Urban Sustainability’ co-authored by Sengupta and Hyde. This engages critically with technology provider-led implementation strategies for Smart Cities and identifies practical policy steps for government actors to empower citizen-led, bottom-up sustainability agendas. It is the most viewed and second most downloaded (across three languages) UN policy brief in the series [A].
Informing the development of Manchester’s digital strategy: In the Synchronicity project, the Lab worked collaboratively with MCC and Bronze Labs (a technology SME) to test integration of the use of IoT/urban data for agile local governance and strategic policy formulation. Within Manchester, the Lab reported on the low data availability and integrity via the existing CityVerve legacy city data platform and supplementary data sources. A collaborative approach exploring new use cases involving multiple MCC service teams identified barriers and opportunities for data from connected technologies towards greater agility and responsiveness in local governance. MCC’s Principal Resource and Programmes Officer has attested that CPU-Lab played a direct role in MCC committing to and commissioning the new Manchester Digital Strategy (Creating an Inclusive, Sustainable and Resilient Smart City): ‘Since the end of the project we’re further exploring the idea that decision making can be better informed by better data. The work with Ulysses identified the digital schema that could work and created awareness raising amongst our client base, which were council employees and staff. In September 2019 towards the end of Synchronicity we had a workshop for 40 stakeholders, mostly from the city council. 18 months before no one had wanted to attend, but now people felt that they wanted to be part of it. The ongoing engagement with Lab over the previous 2 years was key to this shift’ [B]. In the most recent annual report published by the council State of the City (2019), CPU research has been acknowledged for its current and projected wider impact on the new Manchester Digital Strategy and attraction of additional IoT funding [C].
Embedding IoT data in smart city mobility planning towards more sustainable journey choices: Located in Manchester, CityVerve was one of three Innovate UK funded Smart City demonstrators. In a R&D space dominated by technology providers, the Lab adopted a people-centric approach to prototyping the ‘Green Travel Planning’ web application to demonstrate the potential use of close to real-time ICT data to enable sustainable travel choices. Focussing on understanding user behaviours, an analysis of existing applications informed the development of an innovative new travel planning application highlighting the environmental implications of travel choices. The innovative digital interface also allowed the collection of data to inform infrastructure and mobility service planning within the city. The findings were published in seven reports and a short film demonstrating functionality [D]. Key insights were disseminated through a series of incremental round tables with MCC, TfGM and technology consortium partners, before being publicly released for the benefit of local authorities and SME’s working with ICT. MCC’s Principal Resource and Programmes Officer has attested that the project ‘makes people think about what a sustainable journey is, taking into account the human complexity involved, and the data gathered can also be used in a very real way to inform planning decisions’ [B].
Integrating Connected Autonomous Vehicles into TfGM's Future Mobility Strategy: Through collaboration with multiple industry and implementation stakeholders as part of the Synergy project, the Lab used computational modelling to shape understandings of the potential of CAV services to augment or replace other motorised public transport services. This has included contributing to GM’s CAV Policies and Strategy in support of GM’s 2038 Net Zero ambition, with implications for the 6 million daily trips undertaken in the city region. The Transport for Greater Manchester (TfGM) commissioned the report ‘Connected and Autonomous Vehicles: The Opportunity in Greater Manchester’ [E], into which the Lab had direct input, marking a turning point in future mobility strategic planning by identifying use cases for CAV deployment in Greater Manchester. The report has resulted in the policy document ‘A Principles-Based Strategy for Connected and Autonomous Vehicles in Greater Manchester’ produced by the TfGM policy team, on which again the Lab was directly consulted [F]. The Lab are formally acknowledged in both the report and the policy document and continue to be involved as a core partner with TfGM in co-producing and monitoring objectives for GMs CAV policies. TfGM have acknowledged the Lab for ‘support in shaping TfGM’s CAV Agenda in the last two years through your involvement on the Synergy project [you] have helped in making GM’s 2040 Transport Strategy more innovative and have placed Manchester high in the ranks on future mobility’ [G]. Wider reach has been achieved through the agenda-setting ‘Future Mobility Symposium 2020’ at Manchester Met which brought together 60 future mobility service stakeholders (including the Manchester Airport Group, TfGM (co-organiser), Connected Places Catapult, Law Commission, Atkins, Oxfordshire County Council, Highways England, Innovate UK, RIBA and Jacobs) to co-develop a forward-looking agenda and public report [H].
Guiding the sustainability agenda of Manchester’s largest regeneration project: Led by Hyde and Sengupta, CPU-Ai is a cutting-edge research-led Atelier on the two-year MArch Master of Architecture programme informed directly by the Labs research expertise. CPU-Ai employs design science to develop theoretical approaches and computational tools for the design, management, governance and understanding of future cities. Since 2018, ca.60 students in CPU-Ai have engaged with the planners in The Northern Gateway (NG) Strategic Regeneration Framework (SRF), a major (150ha) regeneration and development programme aiming to deliver 15,000 new homes in NE Manchester. The 25-year development is on the scale of a new town incorporating transport, green and wider place based social and community infrastructure. The Northern Gateway Strategy and Co-ordination Lead acknowledges the positive impact of working with CPU-Ai on their ongoing sustainability policy in four key areas: 1) Urban design in the form of ‘insight into [impact of] urban design strategies for the Northern Gateway’; 2) Raised awareness of the UN Sustainable Development Goals through ‘the research which mapped out the UN-SDG’s against our strategic ambitions. We now acknowledge that a lot of our work should engage with these goals’; 3) The use of scientific methods for innovation in design noting ‘The CPU complexity and design science design methods for futures helps us change and refine our thinking about the built environment. We are behind the curve of innovation, and we work with you to inform our approaches’; and 4) Changed strategic policy as demonstrated in ‘The SRF – is now moving to a greater level of detail. We have taken some of your student-led research to inform how that is going to come forward, for example, on the green infrastructure, climate resilience, biodiversity, water retention, etc. We have also been influenced by your design options to develop more detailed strategies and plans around transport and movement related to locations and routing of certain options for transport. These have been incorporated into multiple policies such as Sandhills Metrolink options appraisal by TfGM and MCC, Rochdale Road design options by TfGM and ARUP and MCC and Green Infrastructure issues within the City River Park Vision document with Planet. This will impact on 35,000 people in the regeneration area’ [L].
New forms of technology-driven architectural design practice: The cutting-edge CPU-Ai Atelier curriculum combines design acumen with the development of bespoke computational tools to address complex problems through systems thinking. This combination of design skills and systemic thinking has resulted in a highly innovative teaching agenda ( #architectsthatcode). The desirability of CPU-Ai graduates has resulted in high-demand in R&D roles prioritising the development of new approaches for an evolving profession. These include the UK Building Information Modelling (BIM) leader Bryden Wood, who state ‘your graduates have a direct impact on our ways of working in the office and especially in our specialist CT [Creative Technologies] team by bringing in the latest digital workflows. Your graduates learn to code and expand their design approaches beyond traditional software and form based digital design. They are aware of interdisciplinary approaches and requirements for design based on a broad theoretical familiarity. The capacity to grow the CT team at Bryden Wood was partially due to the existing knowledge and skills of CPU-Lab graduates’ [I] and the largest global architecture practice Gensler who state that the CPU-Lab graduate employed there ‘introduced us to new computational tools for the understanding the performance of the building envelope of a project which has just recently gained planning approval. This is a high-profile project with very ambitious energy targets. These targets have been achievable partially due to the use of these new tools that [the CPU-Lab graduate] brought with him’ [J]. The ongoing change in attitudes, processes and practice is reflected nationally in industry and RIBA as attested to by its President Alan Jones, who states ‘at CPU-Lab you are developing new methods with your students based on functionality and evidence by expanding their education into areas of computer science, data analysis and urban simulation. The CPU design science-based approach is playing an important part in the changing trajectory of the profession’ [K].
5. Sources to corroborate the impact
United Nations-Institute of Advanced Studies (Policy Brief statistics): Web link to UNU-IAS ‘‘Sustainable Smart Cities: Applying Complexity Science to Achieve Urban Sustainability’ https://collections.unu.edu/collection/UNU:5478
Testimonial: Manchester City Council Policy, Partnerships and Research, Adrian Slatcher, Principal Resource and Programmes Officer.
https://www.manchester.gov.uk/downloads/download/7121/state_of_the_city_report_2019_whole_document
Cheung, P., Sengupta, U. 2017. CityVerve – Greener Journey Planner. Seven sequential industry focused public reports; CityVerve prototype Web Application Demo 2018:, http://www.complexurban.com/video/cityverve-research-journey-planner-to-enable-greener-travel/
Connected Autonomous Vehicles report commissioned by Transport for Greater Manchester (TfGM). ‘Connected and Autonomous Vehicles: The Opportunity in Greater Manchester’.
Connected Autonomous Vehicle policy in Transport for Greater Manchester Policy Report: ‘A Principles-Based Strategy for Connected and Autonomous Vehicles in Greater Manchester’
Testimonial: Transport for Greater Manchester, Anna Craciun, Innovation Officer, TfGM
Future Mobility Symposium Public Report 2020: http://www.complexurban.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/fms2020_report_web_june.pdf
Testimonial: Bryden Wood, Filippos Filippidis, R&D Project Leader
Testimonial: Gensler (Benjamin Minton, Senior Associate)
Testimonial: Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA), Alan Jones, RIBA President
Testimonial: Manchester City Council - Northern Gateway Development, Matt Doran Northern Gateway Strategy and Coordination Lead
- Submitting institution
- Manchester Metropolitan University
- Unit of assessment
- 32 - Art and Design: History, Practice and Theory
- Summary impact type
- Societal
- Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
- No
1. Summary of the impact
The global challenge of population ageing combined with increasing urbanisation demands innovative approaches to planning our cities in order to support people across the life-course. This research has developed community-engaged programmes across the scales of home, neighbourhood and city. It has established the age-friendly neighbourhood approach to engaged design-research with older people, improved quality of life for 19,854 older people across six communities in Manchester and shaped relevant policy and practice through KE partnerships with local government, including the Greater Manchester (GM) ‘Ageing in Place’ programme (over 12 districts and 151,000 older residents). It has also influenced global policy and practitioner discourse on developing age-friendly cities through our integral contribution to Manchester’s status as the first UK World Health Organisation (WHO) Age Friendly City, GM as the first WHO Age-friendly City-region in Europe, and recognition of Manchester as a 4* Pilot site by the European Innovation Partnership for Active and Healthy Ageing.
2. Underpinning research
The Place Health: Architecture Space Environment (PHASE) research group, led by Professor Stefan White and based at Manchester School of Architecture, argues that the global challenge of urban ageing requires two simultaneous responses: a holistic, multi-determinate planning approach to well-being and full, active participation of citizens throughout their life course. The research investigates and acts on these principles through a series of engaged design-research projects developed in close co-creative collaboration with older people and public institutions.
Through engaged design and research programmes, PHASE has developed the theoretical, practical and methodological conceptualisation of an ‘Age-Friendly Neighbourhood’ (AFN). Through a series of exploratory collaborations with local government, housing providers and international academics, the group developed the pioneering ‘Age-Friendly Old Moat’ (AFOM) project, which is now an internationally recognised best-practice case study [1]. It was the first project to demonstrate how the World Health Organisation’s ‘Age-Friendly Cities’ policy and planning goals could be achieved through highly community-engaged research in specific neighbourhoods. White and Hammond defined the key principles of the ‘Age-Friendly Neighbourhoods’ model in a chapter included in a book edited by the ESRC International Network on Population Ageing and Urbanisation (INPAU), of which they were co-investigators [2]. Their contribution connects social science techniques to place-based design-research and direct community engagement methodologies.
‘Age-Friendly Old Moat’ continues to have significant influence on policy and practice, notably as the template for the GBP10,200,000 Big Lottery-funded Ambition for Ageing (AfA) programme, which resulted in the development of 24 age-friendly neighbourhoods across Greater Manchester, led by voluntary sector groups including Age UK. Old Moat is also cited internationally as a best-practice example of an age-friendly neighbourhood project, and is the basis of the current Greater Manchester Combined Authority (GMCA) Ageing in Place strategy. PHASE undertook additional design-research as local delivery leads for the Manchester Age-Friendly Neighbourhoods (MAFN) segment of the AfA programme, including a series of co-produced local planning and research projects in 5 electoral wards, investigating the potential of engaged research and creative methodologies to address issues of social isolation in excluded communities. Hammond is lead author of a chapter documenting this design research, written with White and Professor Christopher Phillipson of University of Manchester [3]. In theoretical terms, this work on age-friendly neighbourhoods has been consolidated by White in chapters related to disability scholarship [4] and touching on the broader ethical and architectural implications of a Deleuzian post-structuralist framing of difference [5].
Other components of the research have included: the development of a multi-award-winning community technology partnership – PlaceCal – to tackle poor access to local information amongst older people; refinement of our data analysis methodologies through collaborations with Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council and Southway Housing Trust, with both projects exploring how data synthesis can be a conduit for more creative and collaborative design processes; and, in collaboration with the Centre for Ageing Better, the development of place-based age-friendly housing strategies across three neighbourhoods in Greater Manchester [6]. Related design-research exploring the role of collective housing options for older people continues to support the construction of new models of older people’s co-housing across multiple sites in south Manchester.
3. References to the research
White, S., Phillipson, C., Hammond, M., 'Old Moat in an Age Friendly Manchester’ (report) 2012. https://hummedia.manchester.ac.uk/institutes/micra/OLDMOATREPORT110413.pdf
White, S., and Hammond, M., ‘From representation to active ageing in a Manchester neighbourhood: Designing the Age Friendly City’. In ‘Age-friendly cities and communities: A global perspective’ Buffel, T., Phillipson, C., Handler, S. (eds). Policy Press 2018. DOI: 10.1332/policypress/9781447331315.001.0001
Hammond, M., Phillipson, C. White, S., ‘From precarity to interdependence: the role of age-friendly communities in promoting wellbeing in excluded communities’. In ‘Designing Future Cities for Wellbeing’. Boyko, C., Cooper, R., Dunn, N. (eds). Routledge. 2020. ISBN 9781138600782
White, S., 'Including Architecture: What can a body do?'. In ‘Disability, Space, Architecture: A Reader’. Boys, J. (eds). Routledge. 2017. ISBN 9781138676435
White, S., 'The Greater Part: How intuition forms better worlds'. In ‘Spinoza’s Philosophy of Ratio’. Lord, B., Rawes, P. (eds.) Edinburgh University Press. 2017. ISBN 9781474420433
Hammond. M., Walsh. S., White. S., ‘Rightsizing: Reframing the Housing Offer for Older People’ (report) 2018. https://www.greatermanchester-ca.gov.uk/media/1168/rightsizing_msa_final3.pdf
Funding and Indicators of Research Quality:
G1. Ambition for Ageing, Big Lottery Fund, GBP840,000
G2. Innovate UK Healthy Ageing Trailblazers: Stage 1 GBP64,282
G3. Southway commissions GBP63,865
G4. Centre for Better Ageing (GMCA) commissions GBP144,000
G5. GMCA secondment agreement GBP96,000
I1. 2018 EU Smart Ageing Prize (Second Place) – PlaceCal
4. Details of the impact
Establishment of the ‘neighbourhood approach’
Using innovative participative design-research, PHASE has introduced and defined the concept of an ‘Age-Friendly Neighbourhood’ (AFN), which translates the WHO Age-Friendly City principles into a place-based, research-led model for local change. This conceptual definition has been produced through creation of methodologies for, and delivery of, a series of age-friendly programmes at a neighbourhood level, notably in the Age-Friendly Old Moat (AFOM) and Manchester Age-Friendly Neighbourhood (MAFN) projects. The ‘age-friendly neighbourhood’ approach has been a key factor in Greater Manchester being awarded Age-Friendly status in 2017, with ‘age-friendly neighbourhoods’ a central pillar of their delivery plan [A], as further demonstrated through the use of the AFOM pilot as the template for a five-year GBP10,200,000 programme (Ambition for Ageing - AfA) across 24 neighbourhoods in the city-region. Manchester School or Architecture led five of these areas directly and provided training on participatory action planning methodologies for the seven other local delivery partners. Over 20,000 older people have contributed to the AfA programme since 2016, which has led to over 1,413 local projects (total value GBP2,100,000) being funded [B].
Improved quality of life for older residents
The AFN projects have demonstrated improvements in older residents’ well-being and increased levels of social and civic participation. Since completion of the AFOM research, project partner Southway Housing Trust invested GBP730,000 on delivering the age-friendly action plan co-created with local residents alongside related responses such as 277 property refurbishments and 54 new build age-friendly houses. The number of residents who consider their neighbourhood to be age-friendly has increased from 55% to 80% while the number of older people who report feeling lonely or socially isolated has decreased from 21% to 10% as a result of AFOM [C]. MAFN expanded the co-production methodologies pioneered by PHASE across five wards in Manchester. Between 2016-2019, PHASE led over 200 design-research activities with 1,200 individuals and over 6,000 instances of resident participation. MAFN supported each neighbourhood to develop a self-sustaining, independent resident-led multi-stakeholder partnership involving community groups, councillors, council, health and social care services, statutory authorities and the voluntary sector [C]. Each of these co-produced a local neighbourhood action plan and altogether the neighbourhoods co-designed over 150 small projects that address social isolation amongst older people, distributing over GBP356,000 of funding to local initiatives led by older residents.
Local, regional and national policy and practice
Age-Friendly Old Moat is an inspirational case study for the Mayoral Challenge on Age-Friendly Neighbourhoods, launched in 2019 by Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham ‘to identify best practice work on ageing within the city-region'. The 2017 GMCA report ‘The Future of Ageing in Greater Manchester’ sets out the city-region’s ambitions for anchoring age-friendliness as a core principle in the region’s policies, citing the AFOM project as a model that should be replicated. This policy position was subsequently integrated into the Greater Manchester Strategy [D], adopted by the ten local authorities of Greater Manchester. The policy’s delivery mechanism, the ‘Ageing in Place Programme’, which was launched in 2019, looks to establish age-friendly neighbourhoods across 12 districts within the city-region, with a total older population of 151,000 residents. White and Hammond sit on the academic advisory group for the ‘Ageing in Place Programme’. The collaboration with Age-Friendly Manchester (Manchester City Council) and the GM Ageing Hub (Greater Manchester Combined Authority) has significantly shaped strategy, policy and public services within Greater Manchester. This has included two secondments to the GM Ageing Hub at GMCA to develop research-led policy documents, notably supplementary guidance on ageing as part of the forthcoming GM Spatial Framework, which is the 20-year development plan for the city region . These secondments were enabled by White being awarded the Manchester Met ‘Metropolis’ Chancellor’s fellowship. There are 907,000 people aged over 50 in Greater Manchester directly affected by the GM Ageing Hub, regarded by WHO as a best-practice example for ageing policy and practice.
The GM Ageing Hub’s 2018 strategy acknowledges Manchester Met as a key partner, and Paul McGarry, Assistant Director at GMCA, explains how working with PHASE ‘... led us to adopt a focus on creating ‘age-friendly neighbourhoods’... [as] a core feature of the Greater Manchester Ageing Strategy, and has been pivotal in a series of delivery programme such as Ambition for Ageing, the GM Mayoral Challenge on Age-Friendly Neighbourhoods and the Ageing in Place Programme’. He adds that ‘Working with PHASE has allowed us to rethink our approach to ageing and the built environment, and the role GMCA has in shaping it... showing how local government, commercial and academic collaboration can take a lead in shaping the market around issues of ageing and inclusion.’ [E]. The Rightsizing and Rightplace projects developed to address specific knowledge gaps related to planning for older people around place as identified by the ageing, housing and research teams at GMCA. Both were funded by The Centre for Ageing Better, which has a memorandum of understanding with GMCA to support policy-engaged research. In the foreword to the Rightsizing report, GM Mayor Andy Burnham explicitly recognises that the GMCA’s partnership with PHASE ‘has helped position Greater Manchester as world-leaders when it comes to research on ageing [urging] policymakers across the UK to capitalise on this expertise we have available’. Findings of this research have subsequently been integrated into GM Housing Strategy and GM Spatial Framework [F] and nationally promoted by the Centre for Ageing Better. Hammond and White’s age-friendly housing research has been cited by the International Longevity Centre as a key strength of GM’s ageing approach, highlighting the economic opportunities for GM from better responding to the housing needs of older people [G]. Their age-friendly neighbourhood projects are also cited in a report from the Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology (POSTNote) about ‘Creating Age-Friendly Cities’ . The All-Party Parliamentary Group in Social Inclusion report ‘Healing the Generational Divide’ highlighted the integration of research and teaching within Manchester School of Architecture as best practice for exploring issues of ageing and inclusion. The report recommends: “All schools of architecture and architectural practices throughout the UK should be encouraged and supported to explore how living spaces can be designed to promote intergenerational connection.” [H]. More recently PHASE is working alongside Design Council, Microsoft, Cisco, Pozzoni Architects, Health Innovation Manchester and GMCA to create a commercial age-friendly design agency, funded by the UKRI Healthy Ageing Trailblazer programme. The aim of this programme is to scale up innovation enabled by PHASE’s age-friendly research and apply it to a range of live development projects in 2021-2025.
Global policy and practitioner influence
The strength of Greater Manchester’s academic-policy integration on ageing, housing and neighbourhoods is internationally recognised. It contributed to Greater Manchester’s age-friendly programme being awarded the maximum 4* status from the EU-led European Innovation Partnership on Active and Health Ageing and was cited as best practice by the Finnish government who recommended adopting the same approach in its national policy [I]. In their 10-year review the World Health Organisation notes in relation to Manchester’s ageing programme that ‘through partnerships with a local university older people in Manchester have also played an active role as co-researchers investigating and improving the “age- friendliness” of their communities’. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) includes Age Friendly Old Moat as part of an international review of ageing and urbanism [J]. White and Hammond have shared their approach with international delegations from USA, Japan, Portugal, Sweden, Norway, Czech Republic, Netherlands, Belgium and Germany. White provided the keynote address at the launch of Age-Friendly Gothenburg in 2017. White and Hammond have joined Foreign Office policy and research delegations to Wuhan, China, and Montpellier, France. PHASE research is included as a case study in the internationally recognised industry-focused reports series ‘Cities Alive’ by Arup and in various RIBA publications, including ‘The Alternative Age-Friendly Handbook’, ‘Age-Friendly Housing: Future design for older people’ and ‘A Home for the Ages’ [K].
5. Sources to corroborate the impact
GM Age-Friendly Strategy 2018
Ambition for Ageing: Programme Evaluation Report 2020
Southway Age-Friendly Strategy; additional corroboration available from contact in submission system (Chief Executive, Southway Housing Trust)
The Future of Ageing in Greater Manchester.
Testimonial, Paul McGarry, Head of the GM Ageing Hub, GMCA. Corroborating PHASE originating input on Greater Manchester policy change.
GMCA Strategies: Greater Manchester Strategy: Our People, Our Place; GM Housing Strategy; additional corroboration available from contact in submission system (Senior Programme Manager for Homes, Centre For Ageing Better).
Advantage GM: unlocking the longevity economy for Greater Manchester.
Parliamentary reports: Healing the Generational Divide; Creating Age-Friendly Cities.
European policy recognition: Greater Manchester’s application for European Innovation Partnership on Active and Health Ageing reference site candidature; Housing for the elderly – anticipation and preparedness in municipalities (Finnish Government).
International NGO publication: The Global Network for Age-friendly Cities and Communities: Looking back over the last decade, looking forward to the next.
Industry aligned publications: Arup; RIBA. Corroborating impact of atelier on industry practice.
- Submitting institution
- Manchester Metropolitan University
- Unit of assessment
- 32 - Art and Design: History, Practice and Theory
- Summary impact type
- Cultural
- Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
- No
1. Summary of the impact
Ravetz’s research into non-hierarchical infrastructures for artist development and the validation of social-practice art and artists has informed arts policy; and contributed to the organisational security, sector positioning and income capture of national artists’ membership charity, Axisweb, Manchester’s Castlefield Gallery and Salford’s Islington Mill, and benefited individual artists, both professionally and economically. The research with Castlefield Gallery is quoted in the report underpinning the Arts Council England (ACE) policy strategy 2020-2030, has informed the ACE strategy on artists working beyond gallery contexts, and contributed to the gallery regaining ACE funding of GBP210,000. A Knowledge Transfer Partnership (KTP) led by Ravetz with Axisweb has helped to improve their business model and organisational culture, changed external perceptions of the organisation and increased its volume of artist members. This activity has generated GBP60,786 for Axis beyond the original research funding, and an estimated GBP170,000 for artist beneficiaries, leading to a wide range of positive developmental outcomes for social-practice artists.
2. Underpinning research
Professor Amanda Ravetz is an award-winning visual anthropologist with expertise in the interdisciplinary connections between anthropology, ethnography, and art and design. An enduring theme of her research is the way in which participatory methods can be used for social justice and artist development. The underpinning research has three interlinked phases. The first, in partnership with Castlefield Gallery, mapped the provision of talent development in the visual arts in Greater Manchester. The second, with Castlefield Gallery and an interdisciplinary research team, investigated the legacies and methodologies of artists employed on the Arts and Humanities Research Council’s (AHRC) multi-million-pound Connected Communities programme. The third, a partnership with national artists’ charity Axisweb, investigated the problems faced by social-practice artists in acquiring recognition and validation for their practice when working beyond mainstream art world and gallery infrastructure.
In 2011, Castlefield Gallery approached Manchester Metropolitan for guidance after the loss of their core ACE funding. Due to her expertise in arts and social sciences, Ravetz was perfectly placed to be Principal Investigator on the project, which revealed the overlaps, gaps and quality of artists’ talent-development provision in Greater Manchester. Ravetz orchestrated the funding application and research design, and co-authored the final report. Recommendations from the final report were twofold, relating to: (a) new ways to measure the deferred value of arts organisations’ CPD provision to ensure smaller providers are appropriately acknowledged, and (b) a non-overlapping networked approach to artists’ development provision improving artists’ access to a range of opportunities appropriate to different career stages. [1].
Ravetz’s research into artist development led to her role as Co-Investigator (Co-I) on the AHRC-funded Connected Communities project ‘Co-producing legacy: What is the role of artists within Connected Communities projects?’. Ravetz used practice-as-research methodologies to interrogate how artists employed on Connected Communities-funded projects had contributed their specific type of knowledge and research insights to the programme. To grasp the methods and knowledge contributed by the artists, Ravetz worked with artist-researcher, Douglas, who had been Co-I on a Connected Communities project involving several artists, and artist-consultant, Genever. Together they developed a collaborative and reflexive drawing process, mobilised in partnership with Castlefield Gallery, and resulting in a public engagement activity for 40 participants. The day-long event, which produced an expansive set of drawing activities, led to new insights about visual art processes as 'inoperative’ rather than community-forming, and shed light on the specific contributions by artists to the Connected Communities programme [2].
Ravetz further examined artists working in social settings, in a co-authored book chapter (2017), which considered the legacy and impact of artists co-producing ideas in interdisciplinary collaborative projects with universities and communities. This research demonstrates how artists’ participation in these funded projects had proactively and beneficially unsettled research leads’ assumptions about the forms that knowledge can take, creating an important and valued space for non-arts researchers to discover different ways of seeing and knowing, and leading to new types of engaged research partnership [3].
Following the Connected Communities project and its focus on social arts practice, in 2015 Axisweb, commissioned Ravetz to research how artists operating outside the gallery system gain traction and visibility. Through 22 interviews with successful producers, commissioners and artists, the research examined current routes to validation, and questioned whether existing structures enable, or impede, artists’ externally-affirmed successes. The results highlighted gaps in validation for social-practice artists, including: a lack of critical writing, art reviews, mentoring and website exposure; a lack of commitment by organizations to artists rather than fixed-term projects; and a lack of funding streams for those working outside galleries. The research report concluded that the different value systems of social artists demanded an alternative model of validation [4].
In 2017, Ravetz was Principal Investigator (PI) on a ground-breaking KTP with Axisweb, one of a very small number of visual arts projects funded via the programme over the last 40 years. The partnership explores issues facing social-practice artists in achieving proper understanding and recognition beyond a gallery context. Ravetz worked in a non-hierarchical way with artists and other sector professionals to test out new approaches to validation. This included: organisational and research development for the partners; advisory consultation with arts sector peers; stakeholder consultation with a large group of artist advocates; a series of artist commissions inviting the commissioned artists to lead workshops; and critical writing for a new journal. The research report ‘From network to meshwork: validation for social-practice art and artists’ analysed the findings of 40 interviews, follow-up surveys of a 160-strong stakeholder group, and an action-research commissioning programme. Four linked issues facing social-practice artists were identified: (a) difficulties articulating social practice (including creating definitions, and negotiating roles and values); (b) unrealistic expectations from project partners; (c) a lack of support and infrastructure for social projects; and (d) a perceived second-class status of social-art practice in the art world. The report made eight recommendations to address these deficits further and to establish additional pathways to change [5].
3. References to the research
Slater, A., Ravetz, A. and Lee, K. ‘Analysing Artists’ Continual Professional Development (CPD) in Greater Manchester: Towards an Integrated Approach for Talent Development’, ISBN: 9780955955747, 2013.
Douglas, A., Ravetz, A., Genever, K. and Siebers, J. ‘Why drawing, now?’ Journal of Arts and Communities, 6 (2-3): pp. 119-31, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1386/jaac.6.2-3.119_1
Pahl, K., Escott, H., Graham, H., Marwood K., Pool, S. and Ravetz, A. ‘What is the role of artists in interdisciplinary collaborative projects with universities and communities?’, Valuing interdisciplinary collaborative research: Beyond impact, pp. 131-52, 2017. DOI:10.1332/policypress/9781447331605.003.0007
Ravetz, A. and Wright, L. Validation Beyond the Gallery: How do artists working outside of the gallery system receive validation of their practice? Report commissioned by Axisweb, 2015. https://www.socialartlibrary.org/library/validation-beyond-the-gallery
Ravetz, A. and Wright, L. From network to meshwork: validation for social practice art and artists, April 2020. https://www.axisweb.org/models-of-validation/content/from-network-to-meshwork/
Funding:
G1. Innovate UK, KTP010535, GBP140,242
4. Details of the impact
Impact on national policy
The research has enabled sector and artist conversations, and the creation of a non-hierarchical model of infrastructure support for artists that is unique in being artist-led on a national basis. Ravetz’s work has also had a direct impact on strategy change for Arts Council England. The 2013 report ‘Analysing Artists’ Continual Professional Development (CPD)’ and the 2015 report ‘Validation Beyond the Gallery’ are both cited in ACE’s ‘Next ten-year strategy: Evidence Review’ by Britain Thinks (2018), which underpinned ACE’s revised ten-year strategy (2020-2030). The Britain Thinks review refers directly to Ravetz’s research in its section on how to evaluate quality: ‘There is also a difficulty for visual artists with regards to the influence of commercialism on ideas of quality. Ravetz and Wright (2015) explore systems of validation for visual artists working outside of the gallery system, arguing that many artists do not accept the traditional routes to validation of the quality of their work – specifically gallery commissions’. The Britain Thinks authors end this section of their review with a direct quotation from ‘Validation Beyond the Gallery’: “the difference in values and ways of working between this field and gallery culture demands a new and different structure of validation, one based on in-depth consultation with artists, participants, producers and commissioners”. ACE Director of Research, Andrew Mowlah, testifies that: “Professor Ravetz research ‘ Analysing Artists’ Continual Development in Greater Manchester: towards an integrated approach for talent development’, played a significant role in helping ACE think about what the most significant opportunities for talent development among artists are from their perspective […] The future success of the cultural sector depends on being able to draw on a talent pool that reflects society as a whole and is much wider and deeper than it is now. Professor Ravetz’s research influenced the way in which ACE will encourage the organisations we invest in to support and adopt new and emerging talent, to drive artist collaboration and to encourage learning at all levels” [A].
Impact on organisational practice and resilience
Ravetz’s 2013 report equipped Castlefield Gallery with a new typology of development activities that supported their developing a USP for artist development, and provided ways to communicate the value of this work to cultural partners and funders. In 2015, the gallery re-gained core ACE funding of GBP210,000, which had been lost in 2011. Both Castlefield Gallery and ACE have testified that the reinstatement of funding was a direct result of Ravetz’ research . The reinstatement of ACE funding allowed Castlefield Gallery to grow its associate programme, as reflected in its increased membership and income . The funding also gave it greater visibility and credibility as a leader in talent development in Manchester and across the UK . The research directly underpins Castlefield Gallery’s and Bluecoat Gallery’s 2020 artist development programme PIVOT: an 18-month development programme for mid-career artists living and working in North West England [B].
The research enabled the gallery to share its new approach to artists’ development with other small organisations in Manchester, such as the disability-focussed Venture Arts. Venture Arts have credited Ravetz’s research with helping them to build networks and gain resilience and funding: “Amanda’s research on artists’ development has informed our relationship with Castlefield Gallery and the way it thinks and works with artists, regardless of disability. Amanda’s work shaped our partnership with CG and facilitated connections with similar organisations across Manchester, such as Islington Mill, Manifest Arts and Rogue Artists’ Studio […] the partnership with Castlefield Gallery and Amanda’s research along with the PhD has also been a factor in Venture Arts becoming a National Portfolio Organisation.” [C].
Ravetz’s work with visual art charity, Portraits of Recovery (PORe), has been credited by their executive as having “helped us to develop a credible, acclaimed portfolio of work. Amanda’s academic reputation, research and future working is referenced in our successful funding bid to Arts Council England’s Elevate programme.” [D]. PORe collaborated with Ravetz on the Wonderland project (2016) and My Recoverist Family (2017). My Recoverist Family screened at REEL Recovery Film Festival, Los Angeles and New York; at Whitworth Art Gallery, with the panel including writer, Will Self; at Islington Mill Art Academy; at the ESRC Social Science Festival, Manchester and at the Niamos Centre in Hulme, Manchester. Between 2016 and 2020 Wonderland was viewed over 5,682 times. PORe have attested that the partnership has helped them to gain new networks and organisational resilience, which has directly contributed to their ongoing sustainability [D].
Ravetz’s creation of a collaborative PhD with grassroots arts organisation, Islington Mill, in Salford is credited by Director, Maurice Carlin, as directly contributing to the organisation’s resilience by allowing the development of their public programme: “The GBP80,000 that Amanda’s work has helped us to raise is employing our new full time General Manager and a part-time Projects Coordinator. They’re the first two members of the new charity that we’ve formed called Islington Mill Foundation. They’re going to help us to restart our public programme […] We will expand our residency programme. The funding is going to be used to build a large new residency space up in the top 2 floors which will be big enough for 24 artists to stay in. All these impacts can be traced back to the PhD that Amanda initiated.” Ravetz’s ongoing consultative work with Islington Mill is further credited by Carlin as contributing directly to their securing of GBP800,000 of Heritage Lottery Funding, an essential part of a £2.5 million bid to save Islington Mill’s future existence: “In terms of tangible outputs from Amanda’s contributions, we received GBP800,000 worth of National Lottery Heritage funding in part as a result of her work with us and her contribution to that process. I would say she’s one of the key people in this city whose voice is very much in our minds when we’re thinking about our future.” Importantly for Carlin, it was Ravetz’s research expertise in artist-led validation that allowed the Heritage Lottery Funding (HLF) bid to be, not only successful, but successful on the organisation’s own terms: “Amanda has a really good sense of why there’s something special here. Why there’s something artist-led about this place that means it can hold ambiguities, uncertainties and question marks and insist on the value of those things. When you’re in a position like we were, where we were desperate to get this funding, you’ll almost do anything. It was really useful to have people like Amanda there saying ‘No, you know what, this is what I think the value of this is and this is what you can insist on’, this is the value that artist-led brings” [E].
Ravetz’s research insights into the separation of the mainstream arts sector and those working outside the paradigm of the art market have also impacted on the funding, visibility and success of Axisweb. The KTP with Axisweb is credited with helping them to increase their membership threefold and move from a 10% to a 100% self-generated business income model. The partnership is known to have led to a minimum of 51 artist commissions; 45,343 engagements (audiences, participants, attendees, etc.); 2,087 tangible outputs (zines, events, artworks etc.) and GBP60,786 in income generated. 15K of this funding has been used by Axis to establish the Social Art Library, the idea for which derived directly from Ravetz’s 2015 research and the KTP partnership. The report on the KTP ( From Network to Meshwork) has influenced crafts social practice, and is cited under the Useful Resources section of the AHRC-funded publication Stitching Together Good Practice Guide. Independent evaluation found that the KTP can be credited for 60% of Axisweb’s organisational sustainability and everything that ensued from that, including increased membership from 1,500 to 5,000+; new and expanded non-funder-based income streams; new support for socially-engaged artists; and a more diverse range of activity for members [F].
Impact on artists
In terms of the significance and reach of this impact for Axis’ members, those involved in the research experienced an increased range of benefits from their membership, including raised profile, quality assurance for grant applications, and facilitated access to exhibition and studio space. They formed new networks with other artists, practitioners and commissioners; gained fresh perspectives through sharing information; and became less isolated, which caused them to feel validated, visible, recognised and credible. Artists commissioned as part of the action research have experienced further impacts, including: 12 additional artist commissions; 9,500 additional artist engagements; and 1,978 outputs, including zines, events, networks, films and fora. These activities generated a minimum GBP32,500 in further commissions, grants and crowdfunding. In surveys, Axisweb members remark that, whereas previously, Axisweb functioned mainly as an online platform, in the past five years (since the organisation’s change of direction and Ravetz’s consultancy work with them) more support is available to socially-engaged artists and a more diverse programme is on offer, including events and commissions. The KTP contributed to an average 87% of the successful outcomes and longer-term impacts that artists identified from their involvement in the research as commissioned artists or attendees/participants of the commissioned activities. This percentage calculates as GBP170,000 of income across all the commissioned artists. [F].
The research team’s publication, Social Work? Open, a new journal for socially-engaged artists and the first of its kind in the UK, commissioned 16 artists (including long and short form) plus one artist commission. 400 hard copies were distributed (including 350 sold); 1,400+ were read online and 450 were downloaded. [G]. Artists recognised and welcomed the unique place that the experiences and conversations arising from the research held in the sector, commenting on the non-hierarchical approach to the research as its unique characteristic, with one participant commenting: “I feel strongly socially engaged art is the end of the radar, it’s not been high profile. This programme was about validation and it’s been a hard journey to achieve any validation – we’re very invisible in many ways. I think it [the KTP] is unique in that the core values are quite different from anything else that’s happening. The non-hierarchical, non-judgemental, non-led. People can come up with an idea and make it happen. The artists are the heart of everything rather than the administration” [F].
5. Sources to corroborate the impact
Britain Thinks review, Arts Council England, p.16, 2018; Andrew Mowlah, Arts Council England, testimonial. Corroborating impact on national policy.
Helen Wewiora/Castlefield Gallery statistics; Arts Council England National Portfolio Organisation assessment form. Corroborating organisational benefits to Castlefield Gallery.
Amanda Sutton, Venture Arts, testimonial. Corroborating organisational benefits to Venture Arts.
Mark Prest, Portraits of Recovery, testimonial. Corroborating organisational benefits to PoRE.
Maurice Carlin, Islington Mill, testimonial. Corroborating organisational benefits to Islington Mill.
Axisweb testimonial; Axisweb https://www.socialartlibrary.org/; KTP report; KTP evaluation; Independent Evaluation by Sally Fort; Stitching Together: https://stitchingtogetherhome.files.wordpress.com/2020/11/stitching-together-good-practice-guidelines-digital.pdf https://twitter.com/stitchingtgthr/status/1327213861838131202?s=21; Corroborating impacts of KTP on Axisweb capacity and resilience.
Social Work? Open journal statistics provided by Axisweb. Corroborating use of the journal by practitioners.
- Submitting institution
- Manchester Metropolitan University
- Unit of assessment
- 32 - Art and Design: History, Practice and Theory
- Summary impact type
- Societal
- Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
- No
1. Summary of the impact
The Arts for Health research group has impacted on the care provision for mental and physical health through the development of innovative arts-led and publicly-engaged methodologies, as well as creative modes of campaigning and activism. Delivered locally, nationally and globally, the impact of the group’s co-created activity, which is geared to understanding and communicating experiences of physical and mental illness, disability and addiction, manifests itself in three ways: (1) addressing health inequalities by fostering greater inclusion through public engagement and advocacy; (2) creating the conditions for marginalised groups to represent themselves and give voice to the experience of their health conditions and care; and (3) changing health and care practice to engage and empower individuals and communities.
2. Underpinning research
Arts for Health at Manchester Met has been a global pioneer in researching the arts-and-health nexus. Originally founded as ‘Hospital Arts’ to humanise NHS environments, it evolved into ‘Arts for Health’ - the first centre of its kind internationally, for which the (then) lead, Peter Senior, was awarded both an MBE (1994) and the Chevalier des Arts et des Lettres (2001). Heading Arts for Health since 2004, Parkinson led the GBP385,000 HM Treasury-funded Invest to Save: Arts in Health (ISP) research project (2003-2007), which served to consolidate the evidence base for creativity, culture and the arts’ direct impact on health and well-being. This project initiated the transition of Arts for Health from a focus on the clinical environment to a broader public health research agenda, as exemplified by a partnership set up between the University, the Department of Health and Arts Council England (ACE) that resulted in considerable public policy and wellbeing impacts, as reported in our REF 2014 case study. Since 2014, the Arts for Health research group has piloted a range of innovative arts-based public engagement methodologies to support people with physical and mental illness, disability and addiction in a better way. The group’s shared ethos is to provide opportunities for otherwise marginalised demographics to represent themselves and gain agency within the often-disempowering contexts of the health and social care system. Their research seeks to illuminate and valorise a diversity of perspectives and experiences in order to challenge discriminatory attitudes and preconceptions, to improve care models and to address health inequalities with a particular focus on addiction, mental health, dementia and endometriosis.
Ravetz’s and Parkinson’s research has examined experiences of recovery from addiction. Parkinson’s project, I AM–Art as an Agent for Change (2012-2014), involved over 200 people in recovery from substance use in the UK, Italy and Turkey. Examining addiction and recovery via conversation and narrative, with reference to civil rights concerns, his research set out to facilitate a more humanised representation, shaped by collective lived experience, resulting in A Recoverist Manifesto (2014). This research was funded under the European Union’s Life-Long Learning Programme, Grundtvig UK, which supports individuals and organisations involved in non-vocational adult education to participate in European training activities and projects. [1]. In Wonderland (2016), a collaborative artistic research project by, and for, people in recovery from substance use disorder and mental health issues, Ravetz employed artist Nunez’s self-portrait methodology to explore how artistic practice can support the journey and experience of recovery. The aim was to understand the recovering person’s emotional mind set and how art can strengthen the resilience of communities. The resulting body of work (self-portraits, artists’ books, academic articles and online exhibition) was showcased at the Utopia Fair at Somerset House, London, in 2016. The film element of Wonderland won the AHRC’s ‘Research in Film’ award (Utopia category). [2]. In UNSEEN: Simultaneous Realities (2017), co-produced with Manchester-based charity, Portraits of Recovery (PORe), Ravetz examined LGBT, South Asian and disabled communities in recovery from substance use, to document their journey to greater visibility and acknowledgement. The resulting film, My Recoverist Family (2017), was selected for the REELHEART International Film Festival, Toronto, and won Silver in the Best LGBT+ category. [3].
Burke is co-investigator on the D4D (Disability and Community: Dis/engagement, Dis/enfranchisement, Dis/parity and Dissent) project (2017-2020), an ongoing research programme that investigates the ways in which disabled people express, perform, experience and practise ‘community’. Funded by the AHRC’s Connected Communities stream, D4D comprises work packages exploring diverse areas, such as: robotics; the arts; education; employment; genetics; and gaming. Burke’s work stream (‘Now you see us’) involves work with youth zones (Bolton Lads and Girls Club), a local high school (Parrenthorn High School in Prestwich/Manchester), and the New Vic Theatre in Stoke, using arts-based approaches to explore questions of community, identity, equality and inclusion. D4D is anchored in stakeholder co-production and involves close collaboration with ADWUK (Action on Disability and Work UK); DAO (Disability Arts Online); DaDaFest; DRUK (Disability Rights UK); Graeae Theatre Company; Mencap; Stroke support groups (Bristol and Cornwall); MS Society UK; and NDACA (National Disability Arts Collection and Archive), which is delivered by Shape Arts. Burke also worked closely with the artist and filmmaker, Liz Crow, resulting in a chapter on the role of social media in arts-based disability activism, which was inspired by Twitter responses to Crow’s exhibition, 'Bedding Out' [4].
Another key concern of Burke’s and Parkinson’s research is the implementation of collaborative arts practice and arts-based co-production methodologies to promote patient agency, and to improve care provision for people with dementia. Burke’s work on the Small Things project ‘The Island’ (2017) introduced six artists to ten dementia patients from a care home in Wythenshawe, to mobilise Shakespeare’s The Tempest as a tool for the residents to express themselves in creative ways conducive to articulating their personal values and unique life experiences [5]. As a co-investigator on the AHRC-funded project Dementia and Imagination, which brought together NHS staff, care homes, local government, the voluntary sector and various arts organisations, Parkinson investigated how visual arts engagement might contribute to the health and well-being of people with dementia. This research was collated into a handbook (2017), which includes a practical toolkit for artists interested in delivering arts-based activities with, and for, people affected by dementia [6].
Equally concerned with patient agency, Bullo’s work on the language of endometriosis uncovered communication barriers in healthcare leading to diagnosis delays of up to eight years. Visualising the endometriosis pain through co-created artworks, Bullo developed tools for improving communication and, together with a group of volunteers, compiled a terminological lexicon, including some 200 metaphorical pain descriptors for use by women, in consultation about their condition. Supported by a GBP50,000 Faculty-funded International Research Partnership Award, a Latin American branch of the project (Dr Pascual, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Santiago, Chile) was established in 2019 [7].
3. References to the research
Parkinson, C. A Recoverist Manifesto, Arts for Health, Manchester Metropolitan University, 2014. ISBN 978-1-900756-76-1
Ravetz, A. Wonderland: The Art of Becoming Human film, produced in association with Portraits of Recovery (PORe), Manchester Metropolitan University, 2016. https://ahrc.ukri.org/research/readwatchlisten/features/wonderland-the-art-of-being-human/
Ravetz, A. My Recoverist Family, artist film, 2017. https://www.art.mmu.ac.uk/profile/aravetz/projectdetails/1033
Burke, L. and Crow, L. ‘Bedding Out: Art, Activism and Twitter’, in Katie Ellis and Mike Kent’s (eds) Disability and Social Media: Global Perspectives (London: Routledge, 2016), https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315577357
Burke, L. and Zeilig, H. ‘Privileging the Play: Creating Theatre with People Living with Dementia’, book chapter in Social Research Methods in Dementia Studies: Inclusion and Innovation, pp. 205-21, Routledge, 2017. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315517490
Parkinson, C., Taylor, K., Windle, G. Dementia and Imagination: Research Informed Approaches to Visual Arts Programmes, Manchester Metropolitan University, ISBN 9781842201527, 2017.
Bullo, S. ‘ Exploring disempowerment in women’s accounts of endometriosis experiences’, Discourse and Communication, 12(6), pp. 569-86, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481318771430
Funding and Indicators of Research Quality:
G1. A Recoverist Manifesto: European Commission, Grundtvig UK, GRP/12/167P, EUR20,000
G2. Dementia and Imagination: AHRC, AH/K00333X/1, 2013-2017, GBP1,219,353
G3. D4D: AHRC, AH/N004108/2, 2017-2020, GBP1,187,771
I1. Wonderland AHRC ‘Research in Film’ award in the Utopia category
I2. My Recoverist Family (2017) REELHEART International Film Festival, Toronto: Silver in the Best LGBT+ category
4. Details of the impact
Legacy impacts on the global discipline of arts and health
In the report by the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Arts, Health and Wellbeing on Creative Health: The Arts for Health and Wellbeing (2018), which was launched at Manchester Met to celebrate 30 years of its Arts for Health research group, Manchester is described as “the wellspring of the international Arts for Health movement” and the group is identified as being instrumental to the emergence of a global Arts for Health movement. [A]. Demonstrating the group’s ongoing influence on international policy, and recording the application of their research in arts and health practice in Ireland and other parts of the world, their work is cited by WHO in their scoping review: ‘What is the evidence on the role of the arts in improving health and well-being?’ (2019), which has been downloaded over 23,000 times. [B].
In 2015, Wellcome Collection acquired the Arts for Health archives as a major national resource, comprising 179 transfer boxes of paper records, approximately 100 artworks, and a large quantity of audio-visual and digital material. Jenny Haynes (Head of Collections and Research, Wellcome Collection) has attested to both the intrinsic research value of the collection and the effect of this unique acquisition on curatorial and organisational practice, stating that “on the back of this acquisition we were able to secure a significant amount of internal project funding to catalogue and conserve the collections […] Acquiring these collections helped to mark a significant moment of change for us in terms of an expansion of our collecting focus into new areas which are in the same broad area of an intersection between art and health. We now having a growing collection of zines, artists books and art from therapeutic settings and have also begun to commission art for the collections. The material we acquired from MMU and the conversations we had with key contacts there during the process definitely helped us to build our confidence and push forward our thinking in these areas.” [C].
De-stigmatising substance use and promoting recovery
The report by the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Arts, Health and Wellbeing acknowledges, in particular, the impact of Parkinson’s A Recoverist Manifesto (2014) on changing perceptions of substance use and recovery, as well as the role of art as a vehicle for such change: through “building on ideas in the USA Bill of Recovery Rights, a shared statement – The Recoverist Manifesto – was developed, which attempted to dispel the myths associated with substance misuse, reframing addiction as a cultural issue and recovery as a civil rights concern.” [A]. The film version of A Recoverist Manifesto (Part one) has been viewed more than 1,765 times. Testimonial from the national Scottish Recovery Consortium speaks to the value of ‘Recoverism’ as a conceptual framework, stating that the identification with being ‘Recoverist’ has “become part of the national discourse” and that “Clive’s work has therefore had not only a huge impact on all we are doing in Scotland but the way that we do it.” [D].
Ravetz’s work on recovery as a political and human rights issue builds directly on Parkinson’s, destigmatising perceptions of substance use, aiding recovery, and mobilising art as a medium for such change. Her projects: Wonderland (2016) and My Recoverist Family (2017), were developed in partnership with visual art charity, Portraits of Recovery (PORe). Participants in both projects attested to the positive emotional and behavioural impact the work had on them: “ Wonderland was the first time we had looked at ourselves with anything other than society’s eyes. It was about not being ashamed. When we looked at ourselves, we found we were not horrible, twisted monsters. It gave us the courage to do things we haven’t done before.” [E]. My Recoverist Family screened at REEL Recovery Film Festival, Los Angeles and New York; at Whitworth Art Gallery, with the panel including writer Will Self; at Islington Mill Art Academy; at the ESRC Social Science Festival, Manchester: and at the Niamos Centre in Hulme, Manchester. A participant said: “Wearing the costumes, getting to know one another, sharing true-life experience with each other and being that open, honest and trusting was amazing. It was very freeing”… “Looking at the film now, I’ve completely changed...the film was instrumental in that change. It was transformative.” At the Whitworth premiere (audience of 150) Will Self commented: “One of the lovely things about the film was it showed that socialisation is at the core of recovery […] The spontaneity and the involvement of the camera in it in a very non-judgemental and non-narrative way. I found it very moving.” [E]. Between 2016 and 2020 Wonderland was viewed over 5,682 times. In January 2020 My Recoverist Family was one of four films selected as part of Professor Ali Roy’s inaugural lecture on ‘Recovery Stories in Art and Social Research’ at the University of Central Lancashire, attended by an audience of 80 people [E].
Increasing global understanding of dementia
Burke’s cross-disciplinary work on dementia has influenced medical professionals, such as Dr Michael Chapman, director of palliative care at Canberra Hospital and Health Services, who notes that the “work of Dr Lucy Burke has helped me to understand, we have additional tools at our disposal, additional lights and lenses, that can aid in responding to the challenges posed by dementia.” [F]. Burke’s essay ‘Imagining a future without dementia: fictions of regeneration and the crises of work and sustainability’ is referenced in chapter 3.7 of the World Alzheimer’s Report 2019. [G]. Parkinson’s Dementia and Imagination handbook (2017) has shaped artists’ practices across the UK and internationally. Parkinson has delivered training events for over 300 artists, educators and other participants in Australia, Lithuania, Japan and the USA. Three films produced by Parkinson, as part of the Dementia and Imagination project, which explore diverse shared experiences of dementia ( The Grand Tour), and personal narratives of those living with the condition ( On Beauty; On Belonging), were screened across a range of venues, including Wellcome Collection, the National Gallery of Lithuania, and MoMA, New York. Carrie McGee, Assistant Director, Community and Access Programs at MoMA, attested to their power: “The short films you have created so beautifully capture and illustrate what no research study ever could--that the emotional acuity and capacity for appreciating beauty that define the finest aspects of the human experience are alive and well in those living with dementia. I believe these films hold great potential in terms of helping society (policy makers, doctors, family members, care professionals) recognize the full humanity of individuals with dementia.” [H].
Empowering the voices of disabled people
Burke’s expertise in community partnership-working resulted in her being commissioned as leader of Programme Development for the Disability strand of the Manchester-based Sick! Festival 2019, and the associated public art project Graphic Encounters. This project focused on the role of the arts in disability activism, challenging exclusion and negative societal attitudes towards disability. Working with Heathlands Village (Federation of Jewish Services), the LGBT Foundation, and the self-advocacy group, Together All Are Able, Graphic Encounters explores the lives of four women living with disability, illness and long-term impairments. The women’s stories were visualised by four international artists through a series of compelling posters that were shown across Greater Manchester's Metrolink network, and seen by an estimated 890,000 people across the region. [I]. Tim Harrison, Director of Sick! Festival states: “Since we formed, there have only been a handful of people who have had a major impact on SICK!Fest. Lucy is one of these. She has had an impact on how we think about things. She has introduced a nuance, subtlety and depth to how we approach issues. Her integrity and depth of understanding of the subject shaped our 2019 programme and has continued to inform our awareness.” [I]. Burke has continued her work with Sick! Festival through the creation of ‘4OFUS’: four video-cast conversations about the impact of COVID-19 on the lives of people facing particular challenges with access to health and social care, dealing with isolation and loneliness, and providing support for the dying and bereaved. The opportunity to share experiences of lockdown through 4OFUS was described as “incredibly cathartic” by Richard Currie, a disabled contributor. He noted that, “I feel that the project demonstrated how in times of social isolation we can use the platform of social media to bring people together to share their experiences. Taking part in this project it reinforces I am not alone.” [J].
Changing the language of pain
Bullo’s project Language of Endometriosis has changed the diagnosis, discussion and treatment of the condition. 100% of women surveyed on the impact of the project’s two art workshops said these had either “significantly” or “greatly” helped them to communicate their experience of endometriosis pain. Participants also asserted that the workshops had helped them to visualise their pain and translate it into a tangible, more articulate, format; that they now found themselves equipped with a better vocabulary to discuss physical discomfort; and that the workshops offered a “therapeutic release.” [K]. Bullo was invited by theatre director and author, Kailey McGowan, to discuss the effects of endometriosis on relationships. She confirmed that Bullo’s research had informed the script of her play, particularly the theatrical representation of consultation scenes where patients described their symptoms to doctors [K]. Bullo was also interviewed by BBC Radio World Service Health Check Programme, and her work was recommended in The Guardian on 28/10/20 in a letter from University of Sheffield researchers in the field. [K].
5. Sources to corroborate the impact
Report, All Party Parliamentary Group on Arts, Health and Social Change, 2018. https://www.culturehealthandwellbeing.org.uk/appg-inquiry/
World Health Organisation (WHO) reports containing citations.
Email from Jenny Haynes (Head of Collections and Research, Wellcome Collection).
Recoverist Manifesto PDF; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H7KKG89YVmA ; testimonial to support impact of Recoverist Manifesto in recovery communities.
Transcript of ESRC Social Science Festival screening of MRF and post-screening discussion; transcript of panel discussion Whitworth; Wonderland website; Email from Ali Roy and text of lecture; Portraits of Recovery testimonial; Article on My Recoverist Family including link to film: http://notebooks.drustvo-antropologov.si/Notebooks/article/view/91
Michael Chapman, testimonial.
World Alzheimer’s Report 2019.
Carrie Magee (MoMA), email testimonial.
Tim Harrison (SICK!Fest), testimonial. Corroborating Burke’s impact on Sick Festival.
Richard Currie, testimonial. Corroborating Burke’s impact within disabled community.
The Language of Endometriosis evaluation survey data; Kailey McGowan testimonial; https://www.theguardian.com/society/2020/oct/28/the-vast-language-of-endometriosis-pain
- Submitting institution
- Manchester Metropolitan University
- Unit of assessment
- 32 - Art and Design: History, Practice and Theory
- Summary impact type
- Cultural
- Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
- No
1. Summary of the impact
The Crafting the Future (CtF) research group has impacted on the social and economic development of multiple traditional craft communities in India and Thailand, leading to an increase in social wellbeing and economic sustainability. By developing the artisan beneficiaries’ cultural practices through strategies of collaboration and co-creation, marginalised individuals and communities have been empowered; cultural identities have been revived; new cultural production has been created; and new markets and audiences generated. Supported by the Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC), the British Council, and Arts Council England (ACE), international exhibitions of the co-created outcomes have directly engaged 511 creative participants and reached global audiences of over 300,000. This has increased the profile of disappearing practices and marginalised communities, whilst simultaneously promoting cross-cultural collaboration within the beneficiary nations and internationally.
2. Underpinning research
The Crafting the Future (CtF) research group, based in the Manchester School of Art Research Centre, has developed a shared ethos towards revitalising indigenous crafts, and has delivered practice-based research projects in collaboration with artisans and organisations since 2007. Several research outputs (reported in the case study ‘Crafting the Contemporary’ in REF 2014), including the Here and There (HAT) project (2007) [1], Design Camp (2008), Cotton Exchange (2012/3), Field to Fashion (2013) [2] and Warli (2013) [3] initiated experimental research strategies underpinned by the principles of collaboration and exchange. These strategies culminated in an innovative artist’s residency model, which was prototypical in formulating the methodology underpinning our ongoing CtF research.
The critical need for such a pro-active engagement with traditional craft practices and practitioners was established by the AHRC-funded Design Routes (2017) project, led by Professor Evans, which established a typology of strategies for revitalising culturally-significant designs, products and practices [4]. The research revealed that many designs and products are associated with specific places, employ traditional processes and are embedded in local ways of life. Many of these culturally-significant indigenous crafts have fallen out of step with contemporary society, thus becoming marginalised. Design Routes promoted an ongoing reassessment and revitalisation of these crafts, attesting to their enduring importance in shaping cultural identity, and promoting wellbeing and environmental stewardship. This research, with its focus on creative ecologies of place, established the critical framework that informed the practice-based research subsequently undertaken by members of the CtF group.
Subsequent CtF projects have created opportunities for designer-makers to spend time as artists-in-residence, collaborating closely with traditional artisans to generate a body of experience, knowledge and critical exchange, which has led to sustained collaborative relationships between makers, arts organisations and creative communities.
ACE-funded Reimagine India project Heart:Beat (2017), led by Dixon in collaboration with the Clay Foundation, brought together an interdisciplinary team of artists and organisations from the UK and India to undertake a multi-media residency, exploring the cultural tensions resulting from India’s rapid urbanisation. Film, sound and visual artists, and creative writers, from the UK collaborated with researchers from CEPT (formerly the Centre for Environmental Planning and Technology) University in Ahmedabad, and Indian artists and artisans, to explore sustainability strategies for traditional crafts, focusing specifically on Warli painting from the Palghar District in Maharashtra. Operating within the context of the Warli community’s traditions of pictorial narrative, the local and visiting artists created new artworks, which brought the cultural ‘heartbeat’ of the Warli’s fragile rural environment to new audiences in India and the UK [5].
Dixon, Welsh and Chadprajong-Smith worked in collaboration with the British Council on the Tai Lue Project, which developed methods of empowering female weavers in Nan Province, Thailand, enabling the women to realise the creative and business potential of their hand-loomed textiles. The project investigated methods of equipping the weavers with knowledge in design thinking, and new methods of integrating their cultural identity into their cloth. A programme of intensive and extensive participatory design workshops was initiated, which ran intermittently over a three-year period. Through daily meetings and practical workshops, with a specific focus, such as design awareness, pattern-cutting and natural dyeing, the weavers’ design thinking gradually evolved. The research revealed the need to re-think the weavers’ product promotion, to create new commercially viable garments, and to ensure that their business model maximised the economic potential of their environmentally-friendly hand-dyed fabrics. The research also identified a need to explore methods of encouraging a new generation of skilled designers, weavers and businesswomen to engage with the craft. [6,7].
3. References to the research
Magee, J., Dixon, S. Here and There, The HAT Project (2007) [Exhibition] . Queen’s Gallery, The British Council, Delhi, India. 28 March to 24 April. https://www.hat.mmu.ac.uk/chat
Welsh, A., Vishram, S. Field to Fashion (2013) [Exhibition] . Queen’s Gallery, The British Council, Delhi, India. 7 to 13 November. http://alisonwelsh.com/field-to-fashion.html
Magee, J. Warli (2013) [Documentary film] https://vimeo.com/79482128
Walker, S., Evans, M., Cassidy, T., Jung, J., Twigger-Holroyd, A. (2018) Design Routes. Bloomsbury Academic Publishing, ISBN 978-1-4742-4179-3
Dixon, S., Magee, J. Heart:Beat (2017) [Exhibition and film] . Kanoria Centre for Arts, CEPT University, Ahmedabad, India. 1 to 5 April. https://vimeo.com/210185023
Welsh, A., Chadprajong-Smith, J. Fashioning Tradition: The Tai Lue Project. (2018) [Paper and Exhibition]. Fashion Colloquium: State of Fashion. Searching for the New Luxury Musis. Arnhem. 31 May to 2 June. https://design.britishcouncil.org/blog/2018/jul/20/crafting-futures-thailand-state-fashion/
Welsh, A., Chadprajong-Smith, J. The Tai Lue Project: Crafting the Future of sustainable craft through Sustainable Fashion (2018) [Exhibition] . Chiang Mai Design Week, Chiang Mai, Thailand. 8 to 16 December. https://www.britishcouncil.or.th/en/programmes/arts/crafting-futures/tai-lue
Funding:
G1. Here and There, The HAT Project Arts Council England Grants for the Arts (G4A) GBP210,000
G2. Design Routes, Arts and Humanities Research Council AH/K008021/1 GBP768,000
G3. Heart:Beat, Arts Council England, Reimagine India Programme, 32098521(lottery), GBP49,000
G4. The Tai Lue Project, The British Council, A/05353, GBP30,000
4. Details of the impact
Ctrafting the Future has promoted the cultural, social and economic revival of indigenous craft practices and the empowerment of their practitioners, most significantly with the Warli painting community in Maharashtra, and with weaving communities in Gujarat and Nan Province, Thailand.
Warli painting is a form of tribal art practised by the tribal people from the North Sahyadri Range in Maharashtra, India. Building upon networks formed during the HAT project, Magee’s cultural collaboration with Warli painters was consolidated through the filming of Warli (2013), which focussed on the Warli master painter, Jivya Soma Mashe, and laid the groundwork for the Heart:Beat project . The objective of the Heart:Beat residency (2017) was to assess the cultural significance, and address the sustainability, of a traditional but marginalised craft practice, currently threatened by India’s rapid globalisation, industrialisation and rural depopulation. Heart:Beat culminated in an exhibition and installation that attracted an audience of over 1,000 people, including 350 schoolchildren who participated in the event, many from the local Warli community, with others coming from as far afield as Mumbai, Ahmedabad and Jaipur [A]. An initial craft-mapping exercise conducted by researchers from CEPT University in Ahmedabad had established the fragility of this marginal cultural practice, identifying a core cohort of only 22 Warli painters in Thane Province. In addressing this, the residency exhibition brought together the wider creative community for the first time, and a further 28 painters were identified through their participation in the open exhibition, raising the profile of their practice. The exhibition also brought to light a small but significant number of female Warli painters returning to the practice, which had become dominated by men in recent years. Warli painter Ramesh Hengadi, a participant in both the Hat Project and Heart:Beat, commented on how these projects had initiated collaborative curatorial partnerships, which have increased the visibility and financial viability of Warli painting, creating new networks and opportunities for young painters: “AYUSH (Adivasi Yuva Shakti) got connected to me and with other local Warli artists. AYUSH has been there as an organisation since 10-12 year, but they did not do paintings earlier. They were more into farming, due to the Heart Beat project now they got the idea about painting and take it as a production and spread it in the entire region as they already had a network […] I have been given a role in this project, that of a senior artist. I train young artists and also contribute to orders based production. AYUSH have opened a small gallery in Khabala village, towards Dhanu. They also have an office in Waghadi (near my in-laws’ place). I sometimes provide them my paintings. There are different coordinators within this organisation. It is a good project for wage based employment of young generation” [B].
For Heart:Beat, new paintings were commissioned from ten Warli artists, exploring the themes of modernisation, transition, and environmental and cultural sustainability, and these works were exhibited alongside those of the artists-in-residence. Hengadi commented on how the project had influenced and invigorated his creative practice: “I am more involved in bringing a life and soul to paintings. I am in search of old stories, that are in songs, I want to depict them as painting, Warli stories that have not been depicted in paintings before. I am giving birth to new paintings never done before” [B]. Further exhibitions of the work in Ahmedabad; Jaipur; Wellbeck; Stoke-on-Trent and Rochdale have introduced Warli painting to new audiences, numbering 34,794, stimulating cultural tourism across the sites of the touring exhibition, and attracting national and international visitors, whilst also supporting local economies and tourism in Maharashtra [C]. In 2018, the project was further disseminated in the form of an artist’s book, Heart:Beat, which was produced in a limited edition of 200 [D].
In Field to Fashion, Welsh developed environmentally-sustainable strategies, which focussed on the preservation of organic ‘old-world’ kala cotton grown by marginalised farmers in rural Gujarat, India, where production was being abandoned as the yarn diminished in demand. There was an identified need to stimulate an Indian market for locally-grown cotton without the pressures of external influences. Field to Fashion instigated a collaborative international design process with an Indian master weaver, which exposed new cultural products to new international audiences. Today, kala cotton products have become successfully re-established on the international wholesale and retail markets. The Director of NGO Khamir stated: “Alison Welsh has been a part of the success story of kala cotton … since its early inception in 2013. Alison worked with Khamir, the organization that developed the kala cotton as a farm-to-fabric story at a time when it was just being introduced and tested in the market […] Alison saw the potential right away and decided to work closely with Shamjibhai Vishram Siju […] to develop garments and product possibilities.[…] This was an important early step that led to the story of kala cotton being broadcast outside of Kutch and India […] Since 2013, kala cotton has truly become a dynamic co-creating ecosystem where many components have engaged and interacted with one another to bring about a transformation in just 7-8 years. Many weavers who had left their traditional occupation for factory jobs, have actually returned back to the fold. And most importantly, the young weavers see hope for their future and their craft. In this journey, Alison and other designers have played an important role to give it not only the initial push but also to keep touching base, whenever required, with a legacy that has now taken a life of its own.”’ [E].
Similarly, the Tai Lue Weavers project (2018) promoted a sustained engagement with weaving villages in Nan Province, Thailand, many of which were also on the brink of abandoning their cultural heritage, having adopted chemical dyes and synthetic yarns without great commercial success. The project re-introduced eco-friendly practices into the cotton-growing, spinning, dyeing, weaving and garment construction stages of the Tai Lue weaving tradition, and led to the co-design and co-production of new garment ranges using handwoven Tai Lue fabrics. Some of these ranges were co-created with the weavers themselves to develop contemporary garments that demonstrated the design possibilities of traditional Tai Lue weaving. Welsh and Chadprajong-Smith worked closely with the leaders of three community enterprises, representing 52 women in Tai Lue province. Workshops taught both hard and soft skills, including pattern-cutting, garment construction, design and colour workshops, and organic dyeing techniques [F]. The project also brought in young Thai designers and entrepreneurs to collaborate in the creation and marketing of new textile products. The workshops attracted a total of 58 participants, who commented on how the workshops had changed their practice. Thanom Teekawong, a farmer, weaver and Head of Ban Donchai Weaving Community Enterprise, confirmed that: “There is for sure opportunity. The entire group has benefited. They got an opportunity to upgrade their skills, design process, shop and display arrangement. We also got to go on study trips. We learnt pattern making. We have learnt so many things” [F].
The project re-ignited the weavers’ passion for their weaving heritage and demonstrated its economic potential for contemporary textiles businesses. Jiraphat Changlek, a weaver, tailor and store manager at Ban Donchai observed, “We see the opportunity to make ready-to-wear garments. We adapt traditional patterns and make them more contemporary... We see business opportunities and new markets. We have more orders of textiles. Many customers from other districts order natural colour dyed textiles” [G]. Jiraphat also states that the weavers are gaining a higher price for their products, “We earn more than we did before. … Before a shirt that was normal shirt was THB800-850, now with added hand-weaving and hand-stitching details, the price is THB1,200-1,500 depending on the pattern” [G].
Furthermore, the project has elevated the weavers’ profile, nationally and internationally, through conferences, publications, exhibitions, festivals and online presence. Since her interview, conducted by the Tai Lue project media partner, The Cloud Magazine, five television programmes have focused on the success of Phaeo Phafai’s business (with a total of 20,843 views on YouTube). “The situation of our community has changed. Because our products are better, and we could sell for higher price. So, we have more resources to hire more people to work with us and they earn good income and more people join our network” [G].
An audience of more than 100,000 visitors attended Chiang Mai Design Week, where the Tai Lue garments were exhibited in December 2018 [H]. Andrew Glass, Director of British Council, Thailand, stated: “Through her design-thinking workshops as well as her advice given to artisans individually and as a group, Alison enabled the artisans to have a better understanding about the design process. Artisans are now able to see that design is part of the making process and can incorporate new ideas into the design of new products. This includes working on colour combination, natural dyes, and shop front displays, which help improve the design as well as brand images and marketing, which were new concepts to them. Alison's approach to design and making allows artisans to appreciate and build on their weaving traditions and hand skills. Her design work for the project focuses on bringing out the intricate details of the weaving combined with hand skills and slow making. Artisans then have an opportunity to see making in a different light and value their skills and heritage more. This also gives them a better understanding about the value of crafts and encourages them to continue with the crafts within their communities” [I]. A video film documenting the Tai Lue Project, and its impact on the women weavers of Nan Province, was premiered at a (COVID19 compliant) online event on 6th October 2020. The event featured a panel discussion by project participants and key international stakeholders, and was attended by an international audience of designers, makers, researchers, cultural theorists and curators. The film was selected from over 1,000 entries from 60 countries for screening at the Fashion Film Festival Milano, 13-18 January 2021 [J].
Collectively, the innovative collaborative strategies initiated and tested in the field by Crafting the Future researchers have brought real-world benefits to the many indigenous crafts-makers and communities of practice with whom they have worked. This activity has generated new international attention for the unique and, often undervalued, skills of traditional artisans, and has created cultural sustainability in a time of accelerating urbanisation and global uncertainty.
5. Sources to corroborate the impact
British Ceramic Biennial Heart:Beat report. Corroborating reach and siginificance of Heart:Beat project.
Warli painter testimonial (Ramesh Hengadi). Corroborating impact on local communities.
The Clay Foundation evaluation report to Arts Council England. Corroborating internal impact of Warli exhibition.
The Warli Project Heart:Beat (2018) [artists book] The Clay Foundation, Stoke-on-Trent. Corroborating impact of Heart:Beat project.
Kala Cotton Testimonial. Director of Khamir NGO (Meera Goradia). Corroborating impact on international communities and businesses.
Tai Lue weavers’ testimonials (British Council interviews); British Council Tai Lue Impact Report, (Sasiwimon Wongjarin). Corroborating impact on international communities.
Tai Lue interviews and report. Corroborating impact of project on participants and communities.
Chiang Mai Design week (2018) report and statistics. Corroborating reach of Design Week exhibition.
British Council testimonial, Director of British Council Thailand (Andrew Glass, OBE). Corroborating international impact of Tai Lue project.
Tai Lue documentary film https://vimeo.com/397418215/91e08ce54d and confirmation of Festival acceptance. Corroborating reach of Tai Lue.
- Submitting institution
- Manchester Metropolitan University
- Unit of assessment
- 32 - Art and Design: History, Practice and Theory
- Summary impact type
- Cultural
- Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
- No
1. Summary of the impact
The creative, cultural and social impact of Dixon and Magee’s research derives from a new model of materialising and memorialising conflict, developed across a series of five participatory exhibition and installation projects, which reached a combined audience of 221,636 people and involved 1,542 active participants. Funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC), Arts Council England (ACE) and The Royal British Legion, these projects have re-shaped conventional memorial-making practices, employing ceramics, narrative and an empathic response to emotive objects, to question both why and how we memorialise conflict. In generating innovative and immersive ways of responding to conflict, and engaging participants as co-researchers and co-producers of new multi-media commemorative artworks, these projects have transformed marginalised individuals, volunteers and community groups from passive audiences into active and emotionally-engaged participants.
2. Underpinning research
A sustained period of collaboration between ceramicist, Stephen Dixon, and film-maker, Johnny Magee (2014-2019), has resulted in multi-media artworks that have challenged the perception and memorialisation of twentieth-century conflict, and engaged volunteers and members of the public in the co-creation of ceramic artefacts, installation, sculpture and film. The underpinning research adopted an innovative and iterative public participation methodology, examining how to bring conflict ‘home’ and how to make memorialisation tangible, affecting, thought-provoking and socially-connecting. Dixon’s research has identified ceramics as a potent medium for commemoration, particularly in the culturally significant location of the Staffordshire potteries, while Magee’s documentary film practice has extended the reach and the legacy of their creative collaboration. Taking both medium and process out of the studio to engage with wider audiences, the research has identified and mobilised points of congruence between historic events and the contemporary experience of war, alienation and migration. The research found that employing the emotive materiality of objects was an effective strategy in evoking empathy, which in turn empowered audiences and participants to make an emotional connection with historic individuals’ experiences of conflict through their personal possessions and objects of daily use. The collective research outcomes from all five projects are outlined in the journal article Ceramics Narrative and Commemoration (Dixon, 2019) [1].
The touring exhibition Resonance (2015-2016) was the catalyst for this cluster of projects. The research responded to seven Staffordshire museum collections of First World War memorabilia, and as well as generating new and provocative commemorative works by Dixon and Magee, introduced a participatory methodology, inviting the public to take part in workshops to design digitally-printed ceramic artefacts to commemorate a relative who took part in the First World War. These artefacts collectively formed Column, one of the central artworks in the exhibition, which included more of the participants’ pieces as the tour progressed [2].
Building on the success of the public engagement strategy developed in Resonance (and particularly the participants’ responses to making their own commemorative artworks for Column) a more all-embracing participatory rationale was developed for Resonate (2015). This took the form of a multi-media installation incorporating ceramics, sculpture and sound, commissioned for the British Ceramics Biennial 2015 in Stoke-on-Trent. Here, the entire audience was invited to participate in the making of a memorial, in commemoration of the 5,608 soldiers of the North Staffordshire Regiment killed during World War I. The project’s outcomes were disseminated to a national audience in Magee’s film, Things Just Happen Anyway, screened at the Crafts Council’s Real to Reel Film Festival (2016) [3].
Funded by an AHRC Voices of War and Peace public engagement award, The Lost Boys project (2016) provided the opportunity to test a more focussed public participation strategy, working with young people aged 14-18 (the same age as the ‘lost boys’ of the First World War). The confluence of their ages allowed the young volunteers to empathise directly with these underage soldiers, and to draw attention to their stories, uncovered through the death notices held by Staffordshire County Archives. The young volunteers co-created an extensive body of commemorative ceramics, which were exhibited at the Wedgwood Museum and at Manchester Met’s Special Collections [4].
Passchendaele: Mud and Memory (2017/2019) re-visited and further refined the participatory workshop model developed in Resonance, using excavated artefacts and artworks, made using clay from the Wienerberger quarry and brickworks in Flanders, to compel museum visitors to engage emotionally with the brutal materiality of the First World War battlefield. Responding to these evocative battlefield artefacts, the workshop participants created drawings and prints on facsimile NACB (Navy and Army Canteen Board) plates, which were exhibited en masse as a central installation at the National Memorial Arboretum, the national centre of remembrance [5].
Refugee Tales (2017-2019) compared the experiences of First World War Belgian refugees with those of contemporary refugees in the UK. Dixon and Magee worked with refugees and asylum seekers in Stoke-on-Trent to co-create a collection of ceramic objects that examined narratives of identity, displacement and refuge. The asylum seekers were uniquely placed to give an insight into the contemporary experience of refugees, and to materialise this experience in ceramics. The project received an AHRC Voices of War and Peace (VWAP) public engagement award (2016) and culminated in Magee’s film Breakable (2019), which was screened at the Midlands Arts Centre (MAC) Birmingham and Manchester Met [6].
3. References to the research
Dixon, S. 2019, ‘Ceramics, narrative and commemoration’, Craft Research, vol. 10, no.1, pp.121-131. https://doi.org/10.1386/crre.10.1.121_1
Dixon, S. and Magee, J. Resonance: Reflections on the Great War Through Artwork Inspired by Staffordshire Collections, Touring Exhibition, 2015 https://www.iwm.org.uk/partnerships/mapping-the-centenary/projects/resonance-reflections-on-the-great-war-through-artworks-inspired-by-staffordshire-collections
Dixon, S. and Magee, J. Resonate, Installation, British Ceramics Biennial, Stoke-on-Trent, 2015 https://www.britishceramicsbiennial.com/what-we-do/festival/past-festivals/2015-2/
Dixon, S. and Magee, J. The Lost Boys: Remembering the Boy Soldiers of WWI, Exhibition, The Wedgwood Museum, 2016 https://thelostboysww1.wordpress.com/
Dixon, S. Passchendaele: Mud and Memory, Exhibition, at the National Memorial Arboretum, Alrewas, 2017 and the Memorial Museum Passchendaele 1917, Zonnebeke, Belgium, 2019 https://www.passchendaele.be/en/Museum/MMP1917_videos/Temporary_exhibitions
Magee, J. Breakable, Artist Film, Midlands Arts Centre, Birmingham, 2019. http://stephendixon.studio/films.html
Funding:
G1. Resonance : Arts Council England, Grants for the Arts (G4A) 26573184 GBP20,000
G2. The Lost Boys: Arts and Humanities Research Council/Heritage Lottery Fund, Voices of War & Peace public engagement award AH/L008149/1 (RRB017519) GBP14,951
G3. Breakable: The Royal British Legion, Voices of War & Peace public engagement award AH/L008149/1 (RRB017519) GBP14,924
4. Details of the impact
Collectively, these five discrete but connected research projects have generated cultural impact on museum audiences, social impact on participant and community groups, and creative impact on public museums in the UK and in Belgium, during the Centenary of the First World War. Creative collaboration with public arts venues and organisations has been the central strategy in empowering co-researchers to engage in the re-imagining of public memorials and the co-creation of new commemorative artworks.
Resonance (2015) brought public attention to little-known social history collections of WWI memorabilia in the seven museums of the Staffordshire Museums Strategic Consortium and toured to each of the museums between March 2015 and April 2016, attracting 65,848 visitors. A total of 78 volunteers, recruited by the partner museums, participated in the co-creation of the ceramic artwork, Column, which was exhibited at every venue. As co-researchers, the participants gained new understandings of the contribution of their own relatives to the First World War, through individual research into their own family history. The creative application of this documentary information resulted in them becoming co-producers of a new artwork and gaining the satisfaction of seeing their work shown in the context of a commemorative public exhibition. Evaluation from the museums taking part in the touring exhibition indicated that the use of contemporary art as a strategy for reflection and interpretation increased visitor numbers and dwell time, unlocking archives and collections for new audiences [A]. Feedback from partner organisations highlighted the exhibition’s innovative methodology and presentation of new narratives; “The whole project has been immensely rewarding … completely different from the social or military historian developed exhibitions and displays which we would generally produce. The contrast in approaches is stimulating and imaginative and has made the museums look at their collections in a new and inspiring way, bringing fresh life to our core collections” [B].
Resonate (2015) engaged a mass audience as participants, inviting visitors to co-create a sculptural memorial to the soldiers of the North Staffordshire Regiment. It formed one of the major installations at the British Ceramics Biennial 2015 and generated visitor numbers of 39,225 over the eight weeks of the ceramic festival [C]. 1,217 of these visitors actively participated in the co-creation of the artwork. They attached hand-made ceramic forget-me-nots and individual messages of condolence and contemplation to a structure that supported a monumental clay head, based on the Inter-Allied Victory Medal of 1919. The flowers were made by an army of BCB volunteers, some of whom also assisted Dixon in the construction of the head sculpture, … ‘an eight-foot-high coil pot made from red Etruria marl, the clay on which Stoke-on-Trent sits’ [D]. Visitors commented on the emotive effect of the exhibition, and a raised awareness of the scale of the loss of life in the First World War: “We’re absolutely blown away, the statue just totally depicts the common man…the number of men that were killed, it’s unbelievable really.” [D].
The Lost Boys project (2016) also employed a model of shared making in the production of commemorative ceramic works. 120 students aged 14 to 18 from schools and colleges in Stoke-on-Trent and Newcastle-under-Lyme were recruited as active co-researchers and co-creators [E]. Examining the death notices of underage soldiers, using the Staffordshire Sentinel microfiche library in the Stoke-on-Trent and Staffordshire County Archives, gave them a unique insight into the experiences of First World War soldiers of their own age. The exhibition attracted 421 visitors, who: “…particularly enjoyed hearing the young people’s reflections on what they had gained from this project and their involvement in it.” [F]. Voices of War and Peace project coordinator, Dr Nicola Gauld, commented: “Professor Stephen Dixon’s Lost Boys project brought many different approaches, issues and insights to the wider VWAP project. The production of the ceramics, which included visualisations of the lost boy soldiers, had the effect of giving a sense of immediacy in terms of filling the gap between the past and present, and added a level of emotional engagement which documents cannot always deliver. In an age of visual literacy, the use of ceramics was an effective way of reaching out to larger publics. The experience of participating in the project helped to bring the past alive for the volunteers and enabled them to have an emotional connection with those young people from the past who had also volunteered but in a very different context.” [G].
Collaboration also underpinned Passchendaele: Mud and Memory (2017) where 108 museum visitors and volunteers participated in handling sessions and drawing workshops, using archive material sourced from the collections of the Memorial Museum Passchendaele 1917. Working with the excavated personal artefacts of fallen soldiers from both sides of the conflict, participants gained new insights into the brutal reality of the First World War. This hands-on engagement with the materiality of the battlefield resulted in the co-creation of a ceramic installation, in which the participants transfer-printed their poignant drawings in iron oxide onto facsimile army canteen plates. The exhibition attracted 3,598 visitors to the National Memorial Arboretum [H] and a second showing, at the Memorial Museum Passchendaele 1917 (2019), attracted an audience of 52,411, where visitors were … “surprised by the claywork” and “touched by the stories that were used”, with one visitor stating: “It is is a very moving memorial to all those who gave the most precious thing they possessed during the Great War. It is hard not to shed any tears.” [I]. In January 2020 the central artwork of the exhibition, a ceramic ‘everyman’ made from clay from the Passchendaele battlefield, was permanently installed in the Visitors Centre at Tyne Cot Cemetery, the largest Commonwealth War Graves Cemetery in the world. The Tyne Cot Cemetery is the most visited site in the Flanders Fields region and has visitor numbers of approximately 350,000 each year. The Director of the Memorial Museum Passchendaele 1917 also stated that the exhibition had changed the museum’s curatorial practice: “It was the first time we had organised this kind of art exhibition.The Mud and Memory exhibition made us think differently about using this space. We are currently planning other exhibitions in this gallery, as the adaptions we have made could be used for that as well. Having such exhibitions is another way to interact with other domains and to put the story of the First World War in another perspective. In this way, the exhibition had a huge impact on our exhibition policy.” [I].
The Refugee Tales project (2017-2019) involved 19 contemporary refugee and asylum seekers, from the Burslem Jubilee Group, as active co-producers. The refugees’ first-hand experience of displacement and marginalisation was expressed through storytelling and object-making workshops. These involved responding to historic artefacts relating to Belgian refugees in the First World War, and resulted in a ceramic installation, Medals for Peace, shown as part of the British Ceramics Biennial 2017, which attracted 60,000 visitors. Participants spoke about how the project had empowered them and given them a sense of agency as co-creators. “We felt that there is a support and understanding from the team working with us, they gave us the freedom to shape our ideas the way that we can, the way that we want. We were not told to do one, two, three, we were given an absolute flexibility in having this project and it made us, refugees and asylum seekers, feel that there is a role that we need to pay attention to. Nobody would understand the message unless we say it and unless we tell it. [J]. Group organisers attested to the positive effects of the project on the participants saying: “… it told a story which they could relate to from their past. These workshops are good for their mental health and wellbeing. They engage with people from all aspects of our community and they feel human and not a Home Office number.” [K].
The related artist film Breakable (2019) built on this success to engage with wider audiences as part of the AHRC Voices of War and Peace Festival. Screenings at MAC in Birmingham and at Manchester Met attracted a combined audience of 133. Audience members commented on how it changed their perceptions and understanding of the experience of refugees, both historical and contemporary. [L]
5. Sources to corroborate the impact
Resonance evaluation summary, Staffordshire Museums Service evaluation report for Arts Council England. Corroboratong the reach and significance of the Resonate exhibition.
Copp, C. 2016, ‘Resonance: Reflections on the Great War through artworks inspired by Staffordshire collections’, Social History in Museums, vol. 40, pp. 57-63. Corroborating the innovative nature of Dixon’s methodology.
British Ceramics Biennial 2015 evaluation report for Arts Council England. Corroborating the reach of Resonate exhibition.
BBC Midlands Today news broadcast, 11th November 2015 (Quotes sourced from British Ceramics Biennial Director and project participant) Corroborating the emotional impact of Resonate.
British Ceramics Biennial Lost Boys recruitment flyer. Corroborating co-creation of Lost Boys.
MMU Special Collections Exhibition Summary, The Lost Boys: Remembering the boy soldiers of the First World War. 13th June to 26th August 2016. Corroborating the impact of Lost Boys on visitors.
Voices of War & Peace: The Great War and its Legacy, AHRC First World War Engagement Centre report and testimonial (Dr Nicola Gauld). Corroborating the impact of Manchester Metropolitan within Voices of War and Peace.
Passchendaele: Mud and Memory visitor numbers, National Memorial Arboretum. Corroborating the reach of Mud and Memory.
Director’s testimonial, Memorial Museum Passchendaele 1917 (Steven Vandenbussche). Corroborating the impact of Mud and Memory on museum practice.
Refugee Tales project, participant testimonial (Ayad Mosab) Corroborating personal impact on project participants.
Refugee Tales project, Burslem Jubilee Directors testimonial (Sheila Podmore). Corroborating the impact on project participants.
Breakable, film screening audience testimonial. Corroborating impact on public knowledge and perceptions.
- Submitting institution
- Manchester Metropolitan University
- Unit of assessment
- 32 - Art and Design: History, Practice and Theory
- Summary impact type
- Cultural
- Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
- No
1. Summary of the impact
Brook’s funded research has impacted on the heritage sector through the statutory listing of post-war buildings, the protection of assets by lodging them safely in archive collections, the innovative digital preservation of Manchester Reform Synagogue, and by more broadly recalibrating popular views and preconceptions of mainstream modern post-war architecture. Public talks, walking tours and exhibitions have enabled citizens to re-appraise apparently mundane, non-descript sites as ‘special places of interest’, thereby increasing appreciation of mainstream architecture by embedding it within new socio-cultural contexts and providing alternative perspectives. His work is characterised by engagement with the region, the city, a wide variety of cultural stakeholders, policy makers and the general public.
2. Underpinning research
Brook’s research on ‘mainstream modernism’ architecture in the post-war period (1945-80) encompasses all the constituents of the built environment that, at the time, provided the material background to most people’s experience of daily life but were not regarded as of the avant-garde. Informed by his expertise as a practising architect, his unique ‘holistic approach, embracing architecture, planning, landscape and social history, places [him] ahead of most scholars of the period’ (Senior Architectural Investigator, Historic England **[A]**).
The first milestone in Brook’s long-standing investigation was Manchester Modern, a wide-ranging architectural survey of the region including archival study, interviews, fieldwork and photography. Funded by the Royal Institute of British Architects’ Research Trust, this project was initially published as a report that was lodged with several libraries (2010). Brook subsequently produced a website (with Fablr, 2014), and the project was eventually realised as a book (2017), with support from the Heritage Lottery Fund [1]. He then embarked on research into the architecture of Lancashire County Architect’s Department. This work developed, in part, in response to a thematic focus by the Society of Architectural Historians of Great Britain (SAHGB) and The Twentieth Century Society (C20) on ‘Official Architecture’ (architecture associated with the state). Subsequent archival research and interviews led to a presentation at the SAHGB annual symposium (2016) and drew attention to the hitherto unknown plastic classroom at a school in Fulwood – Brook submitted the building for listing in 2016, it was successfully approved the following year. Published as a journal article, this research established the significance of regional architectural cultures in the post-war period while also introducing a new set of buildings to architectural historians [2]. Extracts were included on Brook’s website, which is cited in both the C20 Society’s letter of support and the listing entry itself (2017).
Infra_MANC (with Martin Dodge, University of Manchester) [3] was another important milestone that consolidated Brook’s expertise in the novel subject area of post-war infrastructure. The exhibition and accompanying illustrated catalogue drew on primary archival research, fieldwork, photography and interviews, drawing attention to artefacts from the collections of the County Record Office, the Museum of Transport, John Rylands Library in Manchester and private individuals. Many of these items were on public display for the first time and had previously remained uncatalogued within the collections from which they were retrieved. New ideas were introduced regarding the conceptual space of unbuilt projects, and the political and spatial traces left by infrastructural schemes. The exhibition attracted over 2,000 visitors, formed a major component of the Manchester Histories Festival (2012), and became one of the foundations for further funded research [6]. It also enduringly influenced the practice of Manchester-based heritage professionals: ‘The Infra_MANC exhibition helped us to shape our thinking about exhibition, access and audience development. This work allowed us to move away from seeing Manchester in a vacuum of Victorian industrialisation, and to reflect on developments and innovations in the recent past and its impact on the city we know today’ (Heritage Collections Officer, Manchester City Council **[C]**).
Making Post-War Manchester (2016) was an exhibition and catalogue [4] that built on several years’ archival and interview-based research into post-war planning by Brook and Dodge, including the hosting of a multi-disciplinary one-day symposium about the reconstitution of the city and society after 1945. Brook and Dodge collected significant amounts of unpublished as well as rich visual archival material. Asking ‘how can the public encounter the unbuilt visions of 1960s planners using new technology?’, Making Post-War Manchester enabled close collaboration with Kevin Tan to explore the interface between archival drawings and reports, 3D design software and games engines.
Involving Brook, Tan and Edwards and supported by funding from the joint Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC) and Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) Immersive Experiences programme, The Life of Buildings [5] was a multi-disciplinary pilot project designed to pioneer new methods for digital preservation of buildings of historical importance. Implementing archaeological and architectural survey techniques, the team integrated documentary material from social history in the form of film, photography, digitised drawings and sound recordings into navigable 3D virtual-reality environments. The case study building was the Manchester Reform Synagogue, which had been earmarked for demolition. As Principal Investigator, Brook collected historical archive data, interviewed members of the synagogue community, wrote the history of the building, and worked alongside Tan to collect digital data on the building. Tan developed the VR headset interface while Edwards commissioned the 3D scanning to support the virtual presentation of the building. Together they explored how the latest digital media could help to establish new relationships with and between archive collections and the public by creating sophisticated 3D environments that were not only openly accessible but moreover fully navigable in the first person. The open-access project website, designed with Fablr, captured the collaborative assembly of new and historic data while introducing the virtual-reality model for all to engage with.
The Landscape and Architecture of Post-War Infrastructure was a public-facing conference that ‘broke new ground while engaging a broad audience’ (Senior Architectural Investigator, Historic England **[A]**). Co-convened by Brook, Coucill and Csepely-Knorr, it was the first to examine the nexus of landscape, engineering and architecture in the post-war modernisation of Britain. As well as scholars, the conference was attended by more than 200 practitioners, artists and aficionados. The research opened up new cross-disciplinary debates and was accompanied by the publication of The Modernist, No. 30, Infrastructure [6], reaching a wide international audience. The conference and publication subsequently led to two new AHRC awards under the Landscape Decision Making call (2019-20), enabling Brook and Csepely-Knorr to engage a wide range of stakeholders in developing new modes of assessment for infrastructural landscapes, which will feed into future policy advice.
3. References to the research
Brook, R. (2017) Manchester Modern (Manchester: The Modernist Society) ISBN/ISSN: 978-0-9955481-2-1
Brook, R. (2018) 'Roger Booth, Lancashire County Architect, 1962-83.', The Journal of the Twentieth Century Society (C20), 13, pp. 130-145. ISBN: 978-0-9556687-5-3
Brook, R. & Dodge, M. (2012) Infra_MANC Post-war Infrastructure of Manchester (Manchester: bauprint) Catalogue of exhibition RIBA Hub/CUBE Gallery, Portland Street Manchester. https://www.the-modernist.org/shop/inframanc
Brook, R., Dodge, M. & Tan, K. (2016) Making Post-War Manchester: Visions of an Unmade City [Exhibition] Manchester Technology Centre, 3/6/2016 - 24/6/2016. https://www.the-modernist.org/shop/mpwm
Brook, R. [ed.] (2019) The Modernist, No. 30, Infrastructure; Csepely-Knorr, L., 2019. 'Wild Landscape', The Modernist, No. 30, Infrastructure, pp. 62-68.; Coucill, L., 2019. 'Industrial Identity and Legacy in the case of the CEGB', The Modernist, No. 30, Infrastructure, pp. 56-61. https://www.the-modernist.org/news/2019/7/16/issue-30-infrastructure-spring-2019
Funding:
G1. 2020. AHRC: Landscape Decision Making GBP100,000
Principal Investigator. The Landscapes of Post-War Infrastructure: Cooling Down
G2. 2019. AHRC: Landscape Decision Making GBP45,000
Principal Investigator. The Landscapes of Post-War Infrastructure: Culture, Amenity, Heritage and Industry
G3. 2019. Paul Mellon Centre for Studies in British Art GBP10,000
Post-doctoral Fellowship. The Renewal of Post-War Manchester: Architecture, Planning and the State
G4. 2018. Paul Mellon Centre for Studies in British Art GBP3,000
Co-Investigator. The Landscape and Architecture of Post War British Infrastructure. Conference. Feb. 2019.
G5. 2017. AHRC/EPSRC: Immersive Experiences GBP52,000
Principal Investigator. The Life of Buildings. www.thelifeofbuildings.org.uk
4. Details of the impact
Building upon this significant body of collaborative research, Brook has generated demonstrable impact primarily in the following ways:
Statutory listing of buildings
Brook’s research has led him to make several successful applications for buildings and artworks to be listed. This represents a major achievement since statutory protection of post-war structures is notoriously difficult to achieve because the evidential threshold for their value tends to be set very high. For example, as part of the Manchester Modern project, Brook located and conducted primary research on a concrete sculptural wall in central Manchester and a private home in south Manchester. Historic England testify that ‘without Brook’s work these two previously unknown structures would have remained outside the strategic planning system and unprotected. The wall in particular has attracted considerable interest locally and online, a good example of the dissemination of his work into popular culture’ [A]. Founded on these successes and following his research into the work of Lancashire County Architect’s Department and Roger Booth, Brook made an application for the listing of a plastic classroom at Kennington School in Fulwood. The case study of the classroom, published on his website, is cited in both the C20 Society’s letter of support and the listing entry itself (2017) [B]. Historic England state ‘The work informed the listing of a school at Fulwood, Preston, and has provided the basis for future decisions on listing, which will be of great public benefit’ [A].
Protection of assets
As well as finding and protecting historic material by ensuring it is deposited in recognised archives, Brook has helped to open museum and archive collections to the public. The Greater Manchester County Record Office (now Archives+) were obliged to consider new access and cataloguing measures as part of their 2014 move to the newly refurbished Central Reference Library in Manchester. Brook worked with the Chief Archivist to advise on classification and access systems for records moved from the Town Hall into the archives, most notably the Building Control archives and the City Engineer’s micro-card collections. These extensive resources were live records that became historic collections by virtue of their survival, and the technical nature of the material required an expert adviser with industry experience. Larysa Bolton (Archives+) maintains that the digitisation of these materials has garnered thousands of online views, which would not have been possible without Brook’s leadership and expertise. Brook’s role as an expert adviser on access and dissemination with Archives+ continues [C]. Similarly, working closely with the Greater Manchester Museum of Transport, Brook displayed significant documents in exhibitions and opened up the institution’s rather hidden, but immensely rich, archival holdings to the wider public. Several architectural archive collections (including those of Cruickshank & Seward, Gordon Hodkinson, and Joe Blackburn) have also been preserved as a result of the Mainstream Modern project, as they were recovered by Brook and lodged with Manchester Metropolitan’s Special Collections. The families of Hodkinson and Blackburn are especially grateful for Brook’s intervention [D]. Hodkinson’s work was exhibited in Special Collections in 2019 and received 1,678 visitors, with comments including ‘As usual, beautifully displayed and easy to learn from and enjoy. Curator Richard Brook’s address was so full of enthusiasm and his manner could be said to be refreshing and beguiling!! Super exhibition’ [E]. The archives have already been used by artists (Sarah Hardacre) and others (Drawing Matter) to develop new work and to cross-reference with other holdings respectively [E,F]. One of the Special Collections curators has noted that ‘Richard’s work on the company archive and his relationships with the current owners of the archive resulted in our acquisition of a significant collection of photographs recording Cruickshank and Seward’s most important buildings. This archive has and will continue to be an important research resource within our collections’ [E].
Innovative digital outreach, recording and publishing
Brook has developed new digital modes of publication and dissemination, celebrated hitherto unknown buildings, realised unbuilt urban plans in virtual domains and reconstructed augmented-reality versions of buildings under threat. He developed the website www.mainstreammodern.co.uk (2014) with partner Geoff Bretherick of web developer Fablr. The website is a live and continuing project that enables Brook to share his primary fieldwork and visually rich secondary research material with the public. The case study buildings presented on the website reflect the expanding geography of Brook’s research, including examples from across the UK. To date, the site has had 33,000 unique visitors, over 100,000 hits with 25% of the traffic from outside the UK. It is regularly used as a reference resource by other scholars and aficionados. In Making Post-War Manchester, Brook and Tan made virtual environments built from unrealised masterplans from the 1960s and exhibited them publicly for two weeks in June 2016 – over 700 visitors roamed around 3D models of unbuilt 1960s mega-structures, using game controllers. The interdisciplinary project, involving architectural history, historical geography and computer science, resulted in an enduring legacy in the form of the website www.mpwm.msa.ac.uk. Visitors stated that ‘it brought back many happy memories’, that the ‘walk throughs [were] a great way to engage people’, and that the exhibition ‘should cause us to reflect – how will our current architectural developments be viewed in 50 years?’ [G]. The project’s success was one of the foundations for the 2017 AHRC/EPSRC award from the Immersive Experiences programme, which funded The Life of Buildings project and involved Archives+ as a key partner [C]. Working with other established partners (Fablr and The Modernist Society) and new collaborators (Oxford Archaeology North), Brook led a pioneering digital preservation project that engaged the community of Manchester Reform Synagogue in dialogue about their past, present and future. Rabbi Robyn Ashworth-Steen said that the research ‘reminded us of the history of our community’, ‘allowed older members of the community to commit to record their reflections of our past and our future’, ‘put to use histories we had collected ourselves’, and that she was ‘able to take the website with me on pastoral visits and shared the software with members who are housebound which provided a great deal of comfort’. The project allowed ‘building and sustaining our community’ in a time of transition, and the website record is a ‘resource that we cherish and will be available to our community for a time to come. Working with the research team headed by Richard [Brook] really energised us’ [H]. More than 100 people attended the launch of the project website and it has been accessed over 1800 times.
Recalibrating public perceptions of post-war building through the Modernist Society
Brook’s expertise was recognised by the fledgling Modernist Society at their constitution in 2009, which resulted in his appointment as formal advisor. He assists the Society with funding advice, project development and makes a regular contribution to their publishing and events programme. In this role he has collaborated in the delivery of books, articles, walking tours, presentations and exhibitions based on his research. The reach of the Modernist Society is significant and extends beyond the Chapter centres of Manchester, Liverpool, Birmingham, Sheffield, Leeds and Croydon, with the largest congregations in the North West and in London. The Society has very healthy online audience figures (42,000 across networks, of which approximately 20% are from outside the UK) compared to similar heritage organisations. The Modernist Society have attested that ‘through partnership on a number of exhibitions, projects and publications, Richard’s academic research and rigour has been integral to our own priorities of delivering projects to the public in an informal, engaging and entertaining way’ [I]. In total, these activities have directly engaged 1,237 people and reached international audiences of more than 5,000. Working with the Modernist Society, the collaborative project and exhibition Making Post-War Manchester was a core component of the Manchester Histories Festival 2016, attracting over 700 visitors. A 60-page printed catalogue with written commentary, accompanying architectural images and historical plans was published with the show and sold more than 300 copies [G]. The Modernist Society were also partners in the Landscape and Architecture of Post-War Infrastructure project where more than 200 members of the public learned about the innovative design thinking in this little understood historical field.
5. Sources to corroborate the impact
Testimonial from Dr Elain Harwood, Senior Architectural Investigator, Historic England. Corroborating impact of new building listings and Brook’s contribution to heritage preservation and appreciation.
Kennington School Listing Advice Report. Corroborating listing of Kennington School.
Larysa Bolton (Archives+) testimonial. Corroborating impact of Infra_MANC exhibition and archival research to archives practice and audience development.
Testimonial from Hodkinson Family. Corroborating impact of Special Collection exhibition on friends and family.
MMU Special Collections testimonial / evaluation material. Corroborating reach and significance of Special Collections exhibition.
Testimonial from artist Sarah Hardacre. Corroborating impact on artistic practice and new cultural production.
Making Post-War Manchester data and evaluation. Corroborating impact on exhibition attendees.
Manchester Reform Synagogue testimonial. Corroborating impact on community.
Testimonial from the Modernist Society / evaluation data. Corroborating impact on development and resilience of Manchester Modernist Society.
- Submitting institution
- Manchester Metropolitan University
- Unit of assessment
- 32 - Art and Design: History, Practice and Theory
- Summary impact type
- Cultural
- Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
- No
1. Summary of the impact
Professor Alice Kettle is one of the world’s most important textile artists whose seminal and award-winning work has created cultural and disciplinary change. Her ground-breaking projects have shaped textile practice and set the benchmark for innovative, participatory projects. Kettle generates collaborative methodologies, empowering marginalised communities and interrogating textiles’ role in shaping identity, politics and society. The Making It project shaped Arts Council England’s (ACE) policy on craft and informed the monumental project, Thread Bearing Witness, which explored refugee displacement through textiles. It challenged an art-historical perception of craft and its practitioners as subordinate, and has generated 678,783 visitors to date. Kettle transforms lives by evoking stitch as a form of resilience and has evolved a participatory art practice that enables trust, equity and co-creativity.
2. Underpinning research
Kettle’s research has established an innovative methodology of collaborative and participatory textile practice that has an immense personal significance for the people that she works with. Kettle’s projects engage diasporic communities, international organisations, schools, community groups and the public via workshops, exhibitions and publications. Kettle’s work is held in international collections, including the Crafts Council London; Hanshan Art Museum, China and the Museum of Decorative Art and Design, Riga, Latvia. Throughout her distinguished career and in her former role as President of the Embroiderers’ Guild (2019 onwards), Kettle has explored the role of textiles in valorising women’s rights; visualising narratives of displacement and belonging; empowering marginalised communities and individuals; and communicating through the agency of stitch [1].
The genesis of Kettle’s ground-breaking collaborative methodology is rooted in her project, Pairings (2009-2011), which established a model of interdisciplinary craft production, involving 38 practitioners from Manchester School of Art and other institutions, including Sunderland, Falmouth, Cardiff and Chichester [2]. These partnerships settled into ongoing creative relationships; informed teaching; and produced seminal artworks. They were also the foundation of Kettle’s involvement with the Cultural Olympiad (2012) and the Making It festival (2013) [3]. Building on this innovative model of collaborative making, Thread Bearing Witness (2017-2019) used stitched textiles to examine subjects of migration, displacement and cultural identity, specifically as experienced by refugees and asylum seekers. Centred on a major exhibition at the Whitworth Art Gallery in Manchester (2018-2019), with multiple satellite projects, Kettle’s monumental textile work was co-created with refugees in France, Italy and Greece, as well as the northwest and south of England. The project was documented in the monograph, Thread Bearing Witness (2018), and the book chapter, Resilient Stitch (2020) [4].
The project ran over 100 workshops for international refugees, who explored their personal experiences, emotions and memories through drawing and embroidery. Stitch was used as a narrative device and culturally-specific language, enabling them to tell their own stories as part of a collective whole. The sharing of personal testimonies in dialogue and discussion accompanied the act of drawing and stitching. These artworks became integral figurative elements of Kettle’s expansive murals, which were exhibited alongside drawings and textile pieces signed by individual refugees [5]. Kettle continued to work with refugees, creating further artwork that was exhibited at the London Art Fair (2020) and the Crafts Council exhibition ‘Collect’ (2020), which resourced the establishment of an online sewing group during Covid19 with Refugee Action (2020). A further facet of Thread Bearing Witness was the public participatory project, Stitch A Tree (2017-2019) [6], inspired by the Refugee Resilience Collective (2013 onwards). The latter worked with children at Dunkirk refugee camp to create tree drawings as a narrative therapy tool. Kettle invited participants to stitch a tree that represented their connection with place, through distinctive styles of indigenous embroidery. Participants also wrote a caption elucidating the personal significance and symbolism embedded in their stitched tree. Many schools and refugee groups adopted the project as a means of teaching stitch as well as exploring issues of migration and the environment. The individual trees were sewn together to form two giant patchwork Forest hangings that symbolised unity, equality, and a shared language of making. Participants for Forest 1 came from all over the world. Forest 2 was made in Karachi, Pakistan, where Kettle worked with over 100 women.
3. References to the research
Kettle, A. and Webb, J.A., ‘A Stitch in Time: Historical Authenticity and Site-Specific Textiles’, book chapter in Barber, C. and Macbeth, P. (eds.) Outside: Activating Cloth to Enhance the Way We Live (2014), Cambridge Scholars Publishing, ISBN 9781443856959
Kettle, A., Pairings I exhibitions (2010-13) and Pairings II exhibition (2012) https://alicekettle.co.uk/pairings/
Kettle, A., Ravetz. A and Felcey, H. (eds.), Collaboration Through Craft (2013), Bloomsbury Academic Publishing, ISBN 0857853929
Kettle, A., Thread Bearing Witness (2018), The Artists Agency, ISBN 9781916432505
Kettle, A., Thread Bearing Witness exhibition, The Whitworth Art Gallery (1 September 2018-24 February 2019)
Kettle, A., ‘ Stitch a Tree’, book chapter in Transnational Modern Languages: A Handbook (2020) eds. Burns, J. and Duncan, D. Liverpool University Press, ISBN 9781800345560
Funding:
G1. Stitch A Tree: GFTA-00045936, Arts Council England: GBP37,769
4. Details of the impact
Kettle’s research, specifically Thread Bearing Witness, has had a profound impact in a range of arenas that encompass the cultural, institutional, societal and pedagogical realms. Her collaborative methodology promotes international engagement and inclusion, placing textiles and stitch at the vanguard of an exciting and socially-engaged contemporary art practice.
Cultural and Institutional Impact
The high-profile venues, lengthy exhibition spans, acclaimed media reviews and lauded publications linked to Thread Bearing Witness were ground-breaking in the medium of textiles, placing it firmly in the rarefied sphere of fine art. The monumental scale of Kettle’s intricately stitched textiles has changed perceptions of what stitched textiles could do or be, creating a new paradigm for the field, which has challenged canonical art-historical hierarchies. Moreover, Kettle has reframed textiles as a shared, as well as a solely individual practice, inherently suited to collaboration, participation and co-creation, thus turning “the belief in the single-handed creation (of textiles) on its head.” [A]. Jennifer Harris, Curator of The Whitworth Art Gallery’s renowned textile collection (1982-2016), commented on how Kettle’s work shaped curatorial policy: “Alice was unique in the scale and ambition of her textile work. It shaped my collecting policy and the collection at The Whitworth. She was at the forefront of a new and emerging type of textiles art which redefined the medium. Alice is unique in the impact that she has had outside the UK as one of the few textile artists with work in international collections.” [B].
The artwork generated by Thread Bearing Witness was shown in eight high-profile exhibitions, centred on The Whitworth Art Gallery, and seen by 678,783 visitors [C]. The other venues were: Winchester Discovery Centre (2017); British Textile Biennial (2019); Gawthorpe Hall ( Strands of Time and Place 2019); Hanshan Museum, China (2019); Karachi Biennale, Pakistan (2019); The Knitting and Stitching Show (2020) and Threads of Change, Saïd Business School, Oxford (2020). In 2020, Kettle’s work with refugees was also the acclaimed central exhibit at the London Art Fair (2020). Thread Bearing Witness engaged new practitioners and audiences, incorporating international grassroots and specialist textile practice. The project mobilised a sea-change in museological practice, reconfiguring the gallery space and reconceptualising exhibitions from mere spectacle to participatory and transformative events. Alistair Hudson, Director of the Whitworth, attested to the project’s revolutionary approach, “the first exhibition to present making as a way of understanding, processing and thinking about societal issues. It challenged established thinking about the value of making. Thread Bearing Witness reinstated the importance of art, expression, creativity and manufacturing… It influenced our thinking as an institution and changed the way the Whitworth worked with artists in the city.” [D] . The Guardian equally recognised Kettle’s pioneering role in “creating a new, politically-engaged textiles practice through unique and powerful work.” [E]. Visitors to the exhibitions were deeply moved by the representations of refugees’ experiences, with comments such as, “I was so touched. So moving, so poignant – made me cry” and “Work created by human hands reminds us that refugees are people just like us.” [F].
Kettle’s research has also had an impact on many individual textile artists working within Thread Bearing Witness: one example is Manchester-based textile student Ibukun (Bukky) Baldwin, who Kettle mentored as the project’s artist-in-residence (2019). Bukky became the first ‘Workshop’ resident at the Whitworth, running courses for refugees. The initiative led to her Deutsche Bank Award for Creative Entrepreneurs in 2019 [G]. Thread Bearing Witness thus re-conceptualised the gallery as an inclusive and productive space where things are discussed, taught, made and sold at the same time as dispossessed people being educated and empowered.
Kettle has equally changed institutional policy in the UK. Pairings and Making It were the nascent models for Thread Bearing Witness and led Kettle to consult on Craft Development Strategy for the Arts Council in South East England (2014). Lynne Dick, former Director of the Making Space charity, who were the project partners on Making It, commented on how the project had “amplified the position of Making Space, enabling this small charity to build in the success and continuously attract new emerging designer-makers to the studio. Since Making It, Making Space studios have been fully occupied and the charity has supported over 21 different designer makers as tenants, a real success.” [H].
Societal and Pedagogical Impact
Of all the significant changes resulting from Thread Bearing Witness, the most profound are those experienced by vulnerable and marginalised people who have benefited from taking part in the project. In the UK, 89 refugee families participated in Thread Bearing Witness and regular charitable donations generated from the project go to PIKPA camp, Greece. Participants commented how stitching textiles facilitated communication (“Everyone realised that stitch was a language that communicated individual stories, feelings and emotions”); promoted wellbeing (“People felt valued through their stitching. The stitching allowed them to tell their stories. It was a very healing and positive process”); created community (“The day we went to the exhibition at the Whitworth, I was so proud that my name was displayed. At that moment I became a member of the UK and the future.”); and fostered self-esteem (“I had such sadness, I forgot I could draw and create art.”). The project further inspired and enabled participants to enter education and careers, with one participant saying: “It has inspired me to study dressmaking at university. I realised it’s never too late. It was very beneficial.” [I]. The project continues to produce legacy impacts: Kettle has set up an online Sewing Group during the COVID pandemic as a supportive, creative space, and Kani Kamil, an artist in Thread Bearing Witness, has commenced a self-funded PhD project entitled ‘The ‘Unnatural Silence’ of Iraqi Kurdish Women’, supervised by Kettle.
Kettle’s work in educational settings has generated positive change and pedagogical impact with over 55 schools and colleges taking part in Thread Bearing Witness alone. In 2019 Stepping Stones, a charity for children with special needs, invited Kettle to become a patron, commenting that the project was “the stimulus for creative work”. This resulted in 16 pupils achieving Explore Art Awards. One pupil from another school stated that, “It was amazing to see our work on display in such a prestigious gallery [The Whitworth] and I will remember the experience forever”. In 2019 Kettle participated in The Mushaira Project, which worked with 27 Manchester schools to make quilts and poetry pods. Jocelyn Aschavir, a teacher, noted how the project educated children about the refugee crisis, increased their creative skills and promoted a sense of cohesion and belonging: “Some of the children had followed the news about Syria and some were aware of the refugee camps in Greece … It was the chance to take part in a collaborative piece of art and to see the huge finished product displayed in a gallery they had never visited before that impacted them the most … Primary schools are community hubs and reach out to the community…The children who visited the gallery with their families were very impressed by their artwork being part of a bigger whole…they felt that they were part of a bigger community.”. Vanessa Rolf, the project artist in schools, expressed how stitch created mutual understanding: “The ‘ Stitch a Tree’ project spoke to people who already understood many of the issues facing refugees but also to those who felt less comfortable talking about the subject as this was a non-confrontational route to discussing displacement and humanity.” [J].
In Karachi, Kettle worked with 100 women, many of whom spoke about the life-changing effects of taking part in Thread Bearing Witness: “Until today I only stitched in the four walls of the house or at Behbud, I never knew that the work we are doing and giving will be showcased at such a high platform. Calling us here today, promoting us and the work we have done makes us realize that we are not only made to take care of our homes, but we can also go in the outside world and stand on our own feet, we can accomplish anything.”’; “I feel very proud. If my husband was present, it would show him that his wife is capable of much more than just handling the house.”; “There are a lot of tensions in life but this sort of work helps cope with them, making it easier to deal with.”; “It shows all the hard work we have put into this project; our hard work is usually hidden to the world, nobody notices us or recognizes our work.”; “It has opened our minds to new ideas.” [K].
5. Sources to corroborate the impact
Professor Tim Ingold, Collaboration Through Craft book review (2013). Corroborating Kettle’s impact on the textiles discipline.
Jennifer Harris, former Curator of textile art at The Whitworth testimonial. Corroborating Kettle’s impact on the textiles discipline.
Thread Bearing Witness, visitor numbers across all venues, and evaluation report. Corroborating the reach and significance of Thread Bearing Witness
Alistair Hudson, Director of the Whitworth Art Gallery testimonial. Corroborating impact on curatorial practice.
Thread Bearing Witness exhibition review, Editor’s Choice, The Guardian, 11th November 2017. Corroborating Kettle’s impact on the textiles discipline.
Thread Bearing Witness and Strands of Time visitor feedback; Evaluation statistics from British Textiles Biennale. Corroborating impact on exhibition participants
Ibukun Baldwin article. Corroborating impact on project participants.
Lynne Dick, ACE testimonial. Corroborating impact on national policy.
Refugee project participant testimonial. Corroborating impact on project participants.
Jocelyn Aschavir and Vanessa Rolf ( Stitch a Tree) testimonials. Corroborating impact on project participants.
Women from Karachi testimonials. Corroborating international impact on project participants.
- Submitting institution
- Manchester Metropolitan University
- Unit of assessment
- 32 - Art and Design: History, Practice and Theory
- Summary impact type
- Societal
- Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
- No
1. Summary of the impact
Tackling misinformation is an ongoing global challenge that is even more pressing since the Covid-19 pandemic has resulted in a rise in health-related misinformation. The Visual Social Media Lab (VSLM), directed by Vis, is at the forefront of innovation on practical interventions that address the timely challenges of visual misinformation. Innovative interdisciplinary impact activities by the VSML resulted in the ‘Questioning Images’ resource (QI), which underpinned election related media literacy campaigns in Canada and Colombia (in 2019). These activities have made a difference through reaching ca. 9,000 teachers, 1.2m pupils, in 70% of all schools in Canada and 199 schools, 76,000 pupils in Colombia by raising awareness of the dangers of visual misinformation as well as teaching tangible skills to identify such images. In the UK, the VSML’s rapid response to Covid-19 misinformation produced a teacher’s guide and trained 80 teachers in a School Trust in Manchester, reaching 1,600 pupils. Evidence of impact was established through teacher surveys, focus groups, interviews and individual accounts. These highlighted that almost all teachers had improved their ability to identify mis- and disinformation as well as their understanding of the danger images play in spreading it. Significant longer-term improvement in pupils’ skills and positive changes within the school environment were reported as well, including improved critical thinking skills. Given the threat of misinformation to modern democratic processes, informing the curricula upon which public education will depend for years to come represents important impact. VSML research and impact activities have shaped national and international policy, practice, thinking and making in the UK, Canada and Finland.
2. Underpinning research
The research involves interdisciplinary collaborative work that brings together expertise from Media and Social Media Studies (Vis), Art History and Visual Culture (Faulkner), and Education and Global Citizenship Studies (Pashby). Their body of work has created a space within emerging academic research on social media for the study of social media images, a significantly overlooked aspect in the field. Work by Faulkner and the VSML developed methods for analysing images from social media, specifically in the aftermath of crises [1]. The work has also focused on specific genres of social media images and how to systematically study those internationally [2] as well as examining the wide circulation of individual high-profile news images and provide new methods and approaches for their study, such as the image of Alan Kurdi, a three-year-old Syrian boy whose image(s) made global headlines after he drowned on 2nd September 2015 in the Mediterranean Sea along with his mother and brother [3]. The research highlights that communication on social media is overwhelmingly visual and that images therefore require standalone attention. This has continued in analysis of the online visual cultures of the Black Lives Matter movement [4].
Based on this ground-breaking research, in 2017 Vis collaborated with First Draft (a globally leading US-based initiative that fights mis- and disinformation through research, training and education) to study the role of images in spreading mis- and disinformation as part of 2017 UK and French national elections. In October 2017, this research accessed data from two First Draft-led election projects; Cross-Check (France) and fact checking organisation Full Fact (UK). Both projects were engaged with identifying misleading stories in the run up to these elections. These stories then formed the basis for VSML research, which examined 95 misleading image-led stories. This work developed a typology for visual mis- and disinformation, identifying the types of misleading images most frequently shared and what was misleading about them. This generated potential indicators that could be used to identify problematic content. The most significant misleading type of image involved unaltered ‘true’ photographs with a false, misleading context.
Subsequently, a series of five VSML workshops were held across three continents, involving 40 high-level stakeholders from journalism, which led to the development of the ‘20 Questions Framework for Interrogating the Social Media Image’ (20Q Framework), which was launched at MisInfoCon in London in October 2018. The development of the framework was in part based on the re-purposing of art historical methods for analysing single works of art to the study of social media images involving misinformation. This work led to a chapter in the ground-breaking and updated Verification Handbook that concentrates on the need to move beyond practises that are solely based in image verification, in order to equip journalists with the skills to deeply question the context of social media images and thus support more accurate reporting [5]. Following the launch of the 20Q Framework a further phase of research initiated the implementation of the framework in Canada and Colombia. Pashby’s work on Global Citizenship Education and the development of teaching resources in Canada [6] has been crucial in further developing the 20Q Framework within an education context, enabling the development of the QI resource.
3. References to the research
Vis, F., Faulkner, S., Parry, K., Manyukhina, Y., and Evans, L. (2013), ‘Twitpic-ing the riots: analysing images shared on Twitter during the 2011 riots’, in Weller, K., Bruns, A, Burgess, J., Mahrt, M., and Puschmann, C. (Eds.), Twitter and Society, New York: Peter Lang.
Thelwall, M., Goriunova, O., Vis, F., Faulkner, S., Burns, A., Aulich, J., Mas-Bleda, A., Stuart, E., and D’Orazio, F. (2016) ‘Chatting through Pictures? A Classification of Images Tweeted in one week in the UK and USA’, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(11): 2575-2586
Faulkner, S., Vis, F., and D’Orazio, F. (2017), ‘Analysing Social Media Images’, in Marwick, A., Burgess, J., and Poell, T., Sage Handbook of Social Media, London and New York: Sage.
Vis, F., Faulkner, S., Noble, S., & Guy, H. (2020). When Twitter Got #woke: Black Lives Matter, DeRay McKesson, Twitter, and the Appropriation of the Aesthetics of Protest. In McGarry A., Erhart I., Eslen-Ziya H., Jenzen O., & Korkut U. (Eds.), The Aesthetics of Global Protest: Visual Culture and Communication (pp. 247-266). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctvswx8bm.18
Vis, F., Faulkner. S., and Guy, H., ‘Verifying and Questioning Images’, in Silverman, C., Verification Handbook: For Disinformation and Media Manipulation https://datajournalism.com/read/handbook/verification-3
Shultz, L.; Pashby, K.; and Godwaldt, T. (2017). Youth Voices on Global Citizenship: Deliberating Across Canada in an On-line Invited Space. International Journal of Development Education and Global Learning, 8 (2), 5–17.
Funding:
G1. Department of Canadian Heritage (Digital Citizen Contribution Program) funding (CAD214,000, GBP114,000)
G2. Luminate funding (USD10,000). This is a philanthropic organisation based in the US.
4. Details of the impact
International impact on visual media literacy
Key impact of this research has been in visual media literacy, which has involved targeted impact activities in three countries: in Canada and Colombia focused on the role of visual misinformation in elections (2019); in the UK in relation to the Covid-19 pandemic (2020).
Canada
Due to the growing threat to democratic processes, especially in relation to the 2019 Federal Elections, the Canadian government have prioritised funding research and interventions to tackle the impact of misinformation on democracy. Canadian NGO CIVIX (non-partisan, national registered charity dedicated to building the skills and habits of active and engaged democratic citizenship among young Canadians) was awarded funding and applied it to update the flagship Student Vote (SV) programme. To ensure this included state of the art materials on media literacy to tackle misinformation they engaged in a global search to identify potential new resources. CEO Taylor Gunn states that the 20Q Framework was chosen because ‘we thought it was genuinely unique, no other people were talking about images like this or using these examples and we had an instinct that this framework and working with images could be incredibly attractive to teachers. And also to students, including younger grades because it is so accessible’ [A]. During 2019, the VSML worked closely with CIVIX to translate the 20Q Framework into an innovative and timely teaching resource: Questioning Images (QI). QI became part of SV for the Canadian Federal Elections (October 2019) and was engaged with by over 1.2m young Canadians, involving more than 9,000 schools and upwards of 25,000 teachers, covering 70% of all schools in Canada [A]. QI has also been supported by Election Canada, the independent, non-partisan agency responsible for conducting federal elections and referendums. QI consists of two versions (Elementary and High School) and exists in English and French. A workshop was developed to introduce it to teachers, which was demonstrated at eight boot camps in Canada (ca.1,500 participants), of which three were delivered by Vis. In evaluating the 2019 SV programme, CIVIX found that 20% of teachers (5,000) had taught QI and used the materials, meaning that it was actively taught to as many as 240,000 pupils. For CIVIX this was the first close collaboration with academia in terms of resource-led development and it has contributed to how the organisation thinks about evaluating programmes and interventions. CIVIX CEO Taylor Gunn confirms: ‘ultimately it was Farida’s research that made QI possible for us and it’s been a really exciting, powerful but also fun partnership. QI was consistently the biggest hook at our boot camps’ [A]. In early 2020 the VSML secured funding from the Department of Canadian Heritage’s Digital Citizen Contribution Program to further develop the partnership between the VSML and CIVIX. This research also involves The University of Alberta (Shultz). This grant (CAD214,000) has been awarded to fully assess the impact of QI during 2020-2021. Chris Beall, Director, Strategic Policy and Research in the Broadcasting and Digital Communications Branch at Canadian Heritage has stressed that this is ‘important and timely work’ [B]. Our impact survey (n=77) shows that almost all teachers agreed the framework improved their ability to identify mis- and disinformation (96.2%) as well as their ability to identify how images play a role in spreading mis- and disinformation (97.5%). Further focus groups with teachers (n=17), highlighted that they had used QI repeatedly since 2019, often as the first media literacy lesson for the year; and used it across all subject areas. They had often also recommended QI to colleagues teaching other subjects, including between schools. Almost all reported increased confidence in questioning images themselves and reported a range of skills improvements in their students, including those not directly related to misinformation detection. These included being able to debate issues better and present arguments more coherently, more sustained interest in this resource than they had expected, as well as the ability and confidence to inform and challenge the opinions of others. A great example was shared by Toronto District School Board teacher Christina Ganev, who explained that her students had questioned a guest speaker from the Toronto Public Library and introduced her to QI as a more up to date and sophisticated approach to addressing misinformation: ‘That to me is really a measure of success; that they remember and that they can apply it in a different context, which is what as teachers we’re always looking for. And that's one thing that Questioning Images does very successfully. So, there's a success story that's incredible!’ [C]. We heard many examples like this one as part of these focus groups.
Colombia
As part of CIVIX’s Voto Estudiantil (VE) programme for the Local Elections in Colombia in 2019, Vis joined CIVIX and partners at a teacher consultation in Bogota in May 2019, where she introduced 20Q and QI as part of a research presentation and workshop. Following this successful workshop, QI was translated as Analicemos Las Imagenes and included in the 2019 VE curriculum. It was distributed to teachers during five Democracy Bootcamps in Bogotá, Buenaventura, Cali, Cartagena and Medellín. In total 603 teachers worked with this curriculum and were given a printed version of the QI framework to be used with their students. The curriculum was given to 199 schools in Colombia and 220 total campuses of those schools. In total 76,245 students cast a ballot in VE 2019, which means QI potentially reached more than 76,000 students. Manuela González, part of the CIVIX team in Medellín notes how QI has contributed to an increase in critical thinking skills amongst students: ‘While we were visiting schools within the development of the Voto Estudiantil project, we identified that several teachers liked this activity due to it being interactive and attractive for students; some of those students started guessing the context of the images by creating stories based on the claims linked to the pictures, which were posts in social media sites. Finally, when the real context, facts and story behind the images were shown to the students, we were able to see how they had conversations where they talked about the need to think in a more critical way about the information that they receive on a daily basis through their social media, and how they could start developing skills to assess if contents are trustable or not’ [D].
United Kingdom
When the Covid-19 pandemic took hold in early 2020 and the UK entered its first lockdown, Vis reached out to Wise Owl Trust (WOT), a group of three primary schools (90 teachers, 1,600 pupils) with whom VSML had been developing a funding project for an extensive and longitudinal Visual Media Literacy intervention. These plans were put on hold when the pandemic hit, though the need for teacher resources to tackle Covid-19 related misinformation was more urgent than ever. The VSML received a small rapid response grant from philanthropic organisation Luminate (USD10,000) to quickly develop a resource for WOT. As a result, a guide for primary school teachers ‘Stop. Think. Share? A Teacher’s Guide to Mis- and Disinformation during the Covid-19 Pandemic’ was published in May 2020 [E]. An impact survey showed that 87.5% of teachers found the guide either helpful or extremely helpful and 78.6% reported having learned something about mis- or disinformation that they did not know before reading it. The same number of teachers also believed a resource like this would be helpful to pupils and parents and 75% stated they felt more confident in their ability to recognise mis- and disinformation while 60.7% said they think more critically about the accuracy of what they share on social media. Finally, 93% stated they would like more resources like this and 96% were not aware of any other similar resources [E]. Confirming these findings, WOT CEO Sophie Murfin states: ‘The guide has made staff far more aware of the issues and what can be done to tackle them. This has helped to curb anxieties around the spreading of misinformation especially associated with Covid-19 and has given them the confidence to question. The ability to pause and think about the reliability of information has had a huge effect on the school community. It has created space for open dialogue. This has in turn led to a far better culture, one of openness and transparency’ [F]. One of the year 6 teachers, Sam Shaw, also notes the impact on her pupils: ‘I have seen a real impact on the kids through teachers having picked up these skills. The kids in my class have become more critical of the things they see online, of the images on social media’ [G]. The Manchester Director of Education has gone on to share the guide with all state-funded primary school headteachers in Greater Manchester (137 schools).
International impact on policy and professional practice
This research has impacted policy making both nationally and internationally. The research has informed the House of Lords Select Committee Inquiry on Political Polling and Digital Media in the UK, for which Vis was invited directly to twice give oral evidence (one closed, one open session). The evidence from the public session has been extensively used in the Politics of Polling report (April 2018). This includes highlighting in full the case of a misleading image (from the Westminster attack in March 2017), which forms a key example in the 20Q workshops and QI lessons. Consequently, the report confirms the need for Visual Media Literacy training: ‘Similarly Professor Vis spoke of the “enormous potential” of the “overhauling of the national curriculum so that we can teach young people, and all citizens, how to deal with information online”’ [H]. As a result of her Visual Media Literacy research Vis was invited to join the EU’s Media Literacy Expert Group (MLEG). For this, the European Commission brings together media literacy stakeholders to meet annually to identify, document and extend good practices in the field of media literacy, facilitate networking between different stakeholders, explore synergies between different EU policies and support programmes and media literacy initiatives. In March 2019, Vis gave the keynote at the Truth Matters: Strategies for Combating Manipulated Realities seminar organised by Fulbright Finland and attended by leading journalists, educators and representatives from the Finnish Prime Minister’s Office. Mirka McIntire Manager, Teacher Exchange and Education Programs at Fulbright confirmed the importance of this presentation, stating: ‘seminar participants praised your talk and I have already shared your email address with the Finnish National Agency for Education, as one of their [Counsellors] of Education was equally impressed by your approach as we were’ [I]. In August 2019, Canadian funders and policy makers The McConnell Foundation, Luminate and the Public Policy Forum convened a group of 23 experts and stakeholders from the fields of civic digital literacy and misinformation prevention under the banner Digital Threats to Our Democracy. Vis attended this invitation-only retreat as the only participant from Europe and the report produced from this convening confirms one of the key recommendations made by Vis on the need to ‘Enrich and scale existing and nascent digital media literacy education efforts. Specifically, secure the adoption of Open Educational Resources through a combination of policy, production, implementation, and assessment efforts in order to reach a goal of universal school-age digital media literacy in ten years’ (p.11 Digital Threats to Democracy report) [J]. Work by Vis, Faulkner and Pashby has also shaped the thinking of the McConnell Foundation and other Canadian funders as well as the Canadian Government on the importance of visual misinformation [B]. In November 2019 Vis was invited to present on Visual Media Literacy at an invitation-only workshop organised by Google and Facebook (ca. 30 participants), Evidence in Action: Identifying Shared Research Priorities on Visual Misinformation, demonstrating the importance of this work to technology companies who are so centrally involved in the distribution of misinformation via their platforms. In March 2020 Vis was invited (as the only European academic) to join the Advisory Board of Reset Tech, a new initiative, bringing together experts from politics, civil society and academia, engaged in programmatic work on technology and democracy focused on shaping policy in this area. It operates internationally to ensure that the commercial interests of big tech companies are compatible with the values of robust and resilient democracies. Executive Director Ben Scott was previously a Senior Adviser to New America in Washington DC, helping design the Public Interest Technology Initiative, and led the technology policy advisory group for the 2016 Clinton US presidential campaign. Of the Visual Media Literacy work led by Vis, he stated: ‘I think your work is exceptional – at the cutting edge of the field in research on digital disinformation and informing the curricula upon which we will all depend for public education in the years to come. This issue sits at the centre of the biggest challenges we face in modern democracies’ [K].
5. Sources to corroborate the impact
Testimonial , Taylor Gunn, CEO of CIVIX, Canada; project data and QI materials
Testimonial, Chris Beall, Director, Strategic Policy and Research in the Broadcasting and Digital Communications Branch at Canadian Heritage
Christina Ganev, Hybrid Teacher-Coach, Toronto District School Board (East York Collegiate Institute), Canada
Testimonial, Manuela González, part of the CIVIX team in Medellín, Colombia; QI materials
Stop. Think. Share? A Teacher’s Guide to Mis- and Disinformation during the Covid-19 Pandemic guide and report; project data
Testimonial, Sophie Murfin, CEO of Wise Owl Trust, Manchester
Testimonial, Sam Shaw, Year 6 Teacher Briscoe Lane, Wise Owl Trust, Manchester
The Politics of Polling Report (April 2018), House of Lords Select Committee Inquiry on Political Polling and Digital Media
Testimonial, Mirka McIntire Manager, Teacher Exchange and Education Programs at Fulbright
Digital Threats to Democracy Report: Wasan Island Retreat August 16-19, 2019
Testimonial, Ben Scott, Executive Director Reset Tech