Impact case study database
Search and filter
Filter by
- University of Lincoln
- 4 - Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience
- Submitting institution
- University of Lincoln
- Unit of assessment
- 4 - Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience
- Summary impact type
- Societal
- Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
- No
1. Summary of the impact
University of Lincoln research into problem gambling has influenced the introduction of gambling harm minimisation measures, including the introduction of an amendment to gaming machine legislation to limit fixed odds betting terminal stake size. Researchers developed close partnerships with gambling support charities and independent industry research organisations to identify recent trends in gambling behaviour and risk factors for problem gambling and associated pathologies. Laboratory based research on the effects of gambling stake size on decision making was influential in the run up to legislative change, being cited in Parliamentary briefing papers, formal advice papers from the gambling commission and all-party working group reports.
2. Underpinning research
The University of Lincoln has led a programme of psychology research in conjunction with key industry stakeholder organisations, charities, national and international research collaborators, addressing risk factors and associated pathologies in problem gambling. The research programme combined questionnaires, interviews and case study analysis with experimental studies of simulated gambling tasks and cognition, producing original insights into problem gambling and new approaches to intervention.
Parke led a study funded by the Responsible Gambling Trust (RGT) which examined within session loss-chasing and the effect of stake size on cognitive function and decision making [3.1]. Participants completed a roulette gambling task alongside an “information sampling task” which required the judgement of the number of different coloured marbles in a bag based upon a limited number of “picks” from the bag. When stakes were high in the roulette task, participants tended to make riskier decisions in the sampling task, choosing to make fewer test picks from the bag of marbles before a decision. This indicated that cognitive processes underlying decision making are negatively affected by higher stake amounts. Roberts was also a collaborator on a laboratory-based study which compared decision making in gamblers who primarily used slot machines within betting shops called fixed odds betting terminals (FOBTs) compared to those that used other gambling forms [3.2]. Consistent with Parke’s work, this showed that the FOBTs group had impaired decision making in an information sampling task relative to non-FOBTs gamblers, even when they weren’t concurrently engaged in a betting task.
Roberts and colleagues surveyed case files for 768 gamblers seeking residential treatment to exam recent trends in problem gambling types and behaviour in conjunction with the Gordon Moody Association (GMA) gambling support charity [ 3.3]. The data showed that whilst the overall level of gambling has remained constant, FOBTs, sports betting, poker and online gambling have become more common whereas horse and dog racing, and the National Lottery have become less popular. Gamblers were also more likely to have attempted suicide, to report a co-occurring mental health disorder, and to start treatment having already been prescribed medication over the 5-year period. Other research by Roberts examined a cross-sectional UK sample of 3025 men aged 18-64 and found that pathological gambling was associated with increased odds of trauma in childhood and life stressors in adulthood including homelessness even when adjusting for alcohol and drug dependence [3.4]. Problem gambling was also found to have a strong association with incidence of violence including intimate partner violence [3.5].
Lincoln research has also devised and evaluated new interventions for problem and pathological gambling. A further laboratory study examined the efficacy of in game “pop-up” messages for ameliorating harm by encouraging people to reflect on their gambling e.g. “Do you know how long you have been playing? Do you need to think about a break? Results showed that such messages had a positive effect on reducing bet frequency in a computerised coin tossing task [3.6].
3. References to the research
3.1 Parke, Adrian. Harris, Andrew, Parke, Johnathan. & Goddard, Paul. (2016) Understanding within-session loss-chasing: an experimental investigation of the impact of stake size on cognitive control. Journal of Gambling Studies, 32 (2). pp. 721-735. ISSN: 1050-5350.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10899-015-9570-x
http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00588
3.3 Sharman, Stephen, Murphy, Raegan, Turner, John and Roberts, Amanda (2019) Trends and patterns in UK treatment seeking gamblers: 2000–2015 . Addictive Behaviors, 89. pp. 51-56. ISSN 0306-4603.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.07.002
3.5 Roberts, Amanda and Landon, Jason and Sharman, Stephen and Hakes, Jahn and Suomi, Aino and Cowlishaw, Sean (2018) Gambling and physical intimate partner violence: results from the national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions (NESARC). The American Journal on Addictions, 27 (1). pp. 7-14. ISSN 1055- 0496.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ajad.12656
3.6 Harris, Andrew and Parke, Adrian (2016) The interaction of gambling outcome and gambling harm-minimisation strategies for electronic gambling: the efficacy of computer generated self-appraisal messaging. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 14 (4). pp. 597-617. ISSN 1557-1874.
4. Details of the impact
Parke’s research showing an effect of stake size on decision making was highlighted in a 2017 briefing document on FOBTs stake size produced by the independent think tank Centre for Social Justice [5.1]. The research was also cited in a House of Commons Briefing note on FOBTs from the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport and in detailed advice from the Gambling Commission to the Secretary of State in 2015 [5.2] as well as in a position statement from the Parliamentary All Party Betting and Gaming Group in 2017 [5.3]. Also in 2017, Roberts co-authored a report submitted to the Department for Culture, Media and Sport consultation on proposals for changes to Gaming Machines and Social Responsibility Measures, highlighting the rise in use of FOBTs as an area for concern that should be considered in future policy making [ 5.4]. In a review to the DCMS, the Gambling Commission drew on Lincoln’s research (together with insights from health and gambling participation surveys and problem gambling support charities) to provide evidence that FOBTs in bookmakers were associated with more harm relative to other gambling forms and endorse a minimum £2 stake [ 5.5]. Subsequent legislation to reduce the minimum stake size for FOBTS to £2 came into force in April 2019 via the Gaming Machine (Miscellaneous Amendments and Revocation) Regulations which was approved by both Houses on 18 December 2018 [5.6]. According to the Gambling Commission’s annual gambling participation survey [5.7], in the year following introduction of the legislation (prior to the onset of Covid-19 restrictions) the proportion of respondents reporting playing gaming machines in bookmakers fell to 0.8% from an average of 1.8% over the preceding 3 years indicating the legislation had been effective in reducing this form of problem gambling.
Parke co-authored several technical reports for independent industry bodies Gamble Aware (formerly the RGT) and the Gambling Commission during the impact assessment period [5.8]. These summarised current knowledge and understanding regarding harm minimisation in gambling and included a series of recommendations for changes in practice to reduce player harm. These measures were aimed at facilitating player awareness (increased provision of responsible gambling information in environment); increase player control (voluntary pre-setting of time and expenditure limits by players; ATM and debit card withdrawal limits); Measures to restrict access (e.g. via self-exclusion schemes); and limits on types and content of gambling marketing. Roberts further co-authored a report [5.9] which was submitted to the Gambling Related Harm All Party Parliamentary Group summarizing her research on gambling related harm with the GMA (with whom Lincoln is acknowledged as a key partner **[5.10]**). Parke’s reports were cited in the Gambling Commission’s and RGT’s formal advice submitted to the Department of Culture, Media and Sport on gaming machine controls and social responsibility measures [5.5]. These included recommendations on setting stake and playing time limits and ensuring operators adequately monitor potentially problematic play and gambling by vulnerable individuals in betting shops.
5. Sources to corroborate the impact
5.1 Lowering the stake on Fixed Odds Betting Terminals. Centre for Social Justice report, August 2017, reference 28 https://www.centreforsocialjustice.org.uk/core/wp- content/uploads/2017/08/FOBT_Publciation.pdf
5.2 Fixed Odds Betting Terminals House of Commons Briefing Report August 2015 (reference 127 and detailed advice from the Gambling Commission to Sajid Javid March 2015 reference 6.
5.3 Position Statement from Parliamentary All-Party Betting and Gaming Group September 2017.
5.4 Report submitted to the Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) review into proposals for changes to Gaming Machines and Social Responsibility Measures. Sharman, Turner, Roberts January 2017.
5.5 a) Gambling Commission and Responsible Gambling Strategy Board Advice to DCMS:
Review of gaming machines and social responsibility measures – formal advice, C, October 2017 http://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/PDF/Review-of-gaming- machines-and-social-responsibility-measures-%E2%80%93-formal-advice.pdf
b) Advice in relation to the DCMS review of gaming machines and social responsibility measures. Responsible Gambling Strategy Board report January 2017.
5.6 The Gaming Machine (Miscellaneous Amendments and Revocation) Regulations 2018 http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukdsi/2018/9780111174753
5.7 Gambling Commission Research Library: Gambling Participation Survey to April 2020. https://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/news-action-and-statistics/Statistics-and-research/Levels-of-participation-and-problem-gambling/Research-library.aspx
5.8 Industry reports:
a) Key issues in product-based harm minimisation: examining theory, evidence and policy issues relevant in Great Britain. Parke, J, Parke, Adrian and Blaszczynski, Alex. Technical Report. Responsible Gambling Trust, 2016.
b) Operator-based approaches to harm minimisation in gambling: summary, review and future directions. Blaszczynski A, Parke A, Parke J and Rigbye, J. Technical Report. Responsible Gambling Trust, 2014.
5.9 Report Submitted to the Gambling Related Harm All Party Parliamentary Group. Sharman, Turner, Roberts. March 2019.
5.10 Letter from Chief Executive of Gordon Moody Association Feb 2020 and Gordon Moody Association Annual Impact Report 2019.
- Submitting institution
- University of Lincoln
- Unit of assessment
- 4 - Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience
- Summary impact type
- Societal
- Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
- No
1. Summary of the impact
Offences involving online Child Sexual Exploitation Material (CSEM) increasingly challenge the capacities of law enforcement, child protection, and clinical services. Research led by the University of Lincoln (“onlinePROTECT”) contributed to better understanding of pathways to CSEM offending, and the development of a new treatment planning tool. Professionals using the tool report increased competence working with CSEM offences. OnlinePROTECT’s research has been integrated into staff training within Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Services, which has been rolled out across England and Wales Probation Services. It has also underpinned treatment developments in the UK, USA, and Belgium, and influenced national and international public debate.
2. Underpinning research
Every five minutes, the Internet Watch Foundation (2018 Annual Report) flags a webpage containing Child Sexual Exploitation Material (CSEM). As internet access has greatly expanded, so too has the number of individuals being arrested and managed by law enforcement and probation agencies for CSEM-related offences. Initially conceptualised as an ‘old crime, new technology’ phenomenon, the unique characteristics of these individuals were poorly understood, precluding evidence-based decision-making about effective interventions and the optimal allocation of scarce agency resources. This knowledge gap gave rise to the onlinePROTECT research programme at the University of Lincoln, led by Dr Hannah Merdian (University of Lincoln) and Prof Derek Perkins (Royal Holloway University of London, West London NHS Trust).
Our initial research aimed to establish whether those who commit CSEM offences are psychologically and behaviourally distinct from those who commit direct, contact sexual offences against children. Findings from an anonymous survey of individuals enrolled in sex offender treatment [3.1] provided the first empirical differentiation of individuals who reported accessing CSEM material solely to facilitate inappropriate sexual fantasies (fantasy-driven offenders) from those who reported accessing CSEM because of a motivation to have direct sexual contact with a child (contact-driven offenders). This is a key distinction for practitioners formulating robust risk management plans and intervention strategies.
Our research also highlighted poor understanding of the fantasy-driven subtype, making it difficult for professionals to comprehensively assess the individual factors that have contributed to, and may prevent, future offending behaviour. In response, we conducted a detailed case study analysis [3.2] to identify the pathways to fantasy-driven offending, the potential risks posed, and the treatment needs of this population. This research identified commonalities in the histories, thinking styles, behavioural patterns, and environmental triggers that appeared to uniquely contribute to this form of offending behaviour.
Drawing on the research in [3.1] and [3.2], we developed a new etiological assessment tool, the onlinePROTECT CSEM Pathways Tool (CPT; see Figure 1). This tool identifies typical pathways to CSEM offending behaviour and supports professionals’ assessment of offender behaviour and treatment needs through systematic guidance. Importantly, the tool can also facilitate the client’s understanding of their own offence-specific pathway, enabling them to co-develop solutions for relapse prevention, desistance, and social reintegration.
Figure 1: The OnlinePROTECT CSEM Pathways Tool
In recognition of the need to ensure the tool’s usability in practice, we subsequently established the feasibility of integrating the CPT as part of group community treatment [3.3]. Further research [3.4] confirmed that non-contact CSEM offenders’ thinking patterns (‘permission-giving thoughts’) differed from those of contact sex offenders. This led to the first conceptualization of implicit theories held by CSEM offenders [3.5], including ‘Unhappy World’, ‘Children as Sexual Objects’, ‘Nature of Harm (CSEM variant)’, ‘Self as Uncontrollable’, and ‘Self as Collector’. A cross-cultural study [3.6] confirmed the presence of these in CSEM offenders in both the UK and Spain.
Overall, OnlinePROTECT research has provided insights into the trajectories of CSEM offending behaviour and psychological factors that underpin it. This information is of critical importance for professionals who need to understand the behaviour in order to develop prevention and intervention strategies.
3. References to the research
3.1 Merdian, H. L., Moghaddam, N., Boer, D. P., Wilson, N., Thakker, J., Cate, C., & Dawson, D. (2016). Fantasy-driven versus contact-driven users of child sexual exploitation material: Offender classification and implications for their risk assessment. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment. Published online before print.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1079063216641109
3.2 Merdian, H. L., Perkins, D. E., Dustagheer, E., & Glorney, E. (2018). Development of a case formulation model for users of child sexual exploitation material. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0306624x17748067
3.3 Merdian, H. L., Perkins, D., McCashin, D., & Stevanovic, J. (2020). A Feasibility Study of Integrating Structured Individual Offending Pathway Analysis into Group Treatment for Individuals who have accessed, shared, and/or distributed Child Sexual Exploitation Material. Psychology, Crime and Law. doi: 10.1080/1068316X.2020.1849690
3.4 Kettleborough, D. & Merdian, H. L. (2017). Gateway to offending behaviour: permission- giving thoughts of online users of child sexual exploitation material. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 23(1). pp. 19-32.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2016.1231852
3.5 Bartels, R. & Merdian, H. L. (2015). The implicit theories of child sexual exploitation materials users: An initial conceptualization . Aggression and Violent Behaviour, 26, 16-25.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2015.11.002
3.6 Soldino, V., Merdian, H. L., Bartels, R., & Bradshaw, H. (2019). Implicit Theories of Child Sexual Exploitation Material offenders: Cross-cultural validation of interview findings. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology.
4. Details of the impact
Online PROTECT research and the CPT has changed CSEM client treatment and case formulation practice and improved staff training and awareness across the offender management sector in the UK and internationally.
Improving CSEM practitioner knowledge, treatment confidence and professional practice
Between August 2013 and February 2020, 20 Online PROTECT workshops were delivered to community treatment providers, social work teams, prisons and probation services both in the UK and internationally (Belgium, Canada, Hungary, New Zealand, Russia, USA). The workshops aimed to fill knowledge gaps around CSEM offending behaviour and professional practice response and were attended by clinical psychologists, therapists, police, youth workers, and legal professions. Of those, 10 were fully evaluated ( n = 384; pre-post training data). Evaluation data (collated and demonstrated through multiple figures in **[5.1]**) demonstrates a clear and consistent pattern that the CPT training significantly increased attendees’ knowledge about the topic, psychological approach and risk, and confidence to conduct treatment (e.g., 92.4% of respondents reported increased knowledge about CSEMos, [5.1 pdf p.23 ] . Qualitative comments endorse the benefit of the CPT for practitioners (e.g. “ I believe the CPT has great potential to improve the ways in which we work with CSEM offenders.” and “Really helpful tool that I can envisage using a great deal.”) [5.1, p. 60 ]. These benefits to knowledge are evidenced further by evaluations of a new CPT-based training within Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service [5.2].
Online PROTECT research has also been integrated into staff training and treatment programmes internationally. The University Forensic Centre Antwerp, a provider of specialised out-patient treatment for sexual offenders in Belgium, have used the contact-driven vs fantasy-driven offending behaviour distinction to improve client assessments [5.3]. Counselling and Psychotherapy Centers Inc., a national provider of Sex Offender treatment programmes in the U.S.A, have revised their treatment curriculum to align with the domains identified in the CPT [5.4]. The research has also influenced training content and professional practice in the assessment and treatment of CSEM offenders in Canada [5.5].
Shaping HMPPS Response to CSEM Offending
OnlinePROTECT has enhanced HMPPS staff practice in the management of CSEM offenders. Over 800 offender managers and probation staff have been trained to use the CPT in the North East and Midlands division of HMPPS alone and the CPT has now been integrated into the National Training Programme for staff working with individuals who have committed sexual offences, with training evaluations showing a “ highly significant increase in all domains”, particularly “improved understanding of internet based offending” and “development of a comprehensive understanding of a service user’s risks and needs” [5.6]. The research was further integrated into the HMPPS’ training workshop for all staff working with perpetrators convicted of CSEM offending, is featured in training videos on the CPT and implicit theories on the HMPPS Staff Learning & Development Platform [5.2] and influenced the development of iHorizons, an HMPPS’ treatment programme for men convicted of internet related sexual offences [5.7].
Influencing offender support practice in the Non-statutory/ Charitable Sector
OnlinePROTECT has also improved practice in the non-statutory and charitable sectors. The Lucy Faithfull Foundation, one of the UK’s leading charities working with offenders to prevent child sexual abuse, report that the CSEM Pathways Tool “assisted clients in their understanding of their offending” and crucially “helped structure individual intervention plans by providing a collaborative formulation between the facilitator and the client” [5.8]. In 2020, Circles UK, a national charitable provider who work with sex offenders to support reintegration back into the community, launched Circles Reboot, for individuals who have committed CSEM offences. Circles UK cite the importance of OnlinePROTECT in the conceptualisation of the programme design and enabling self-assessment to be placed at the core of the programme [5.9].
Informing Public Debate and Prevention
OnlinePROTECT researchers helped develop a joint campaign by the Home Office, Internet Watch Foundation and Marie Collins Foundation to reduce child sexual exploitation by improving young men’s knowledge of the law around Indecent Images. Now in its fourth delivery phase, evaluation results have shown a year on year increase in young men’s understanding of the law in this area [5.10a]. OnlinePROTECT researchers were also commissioned by the Centre for Expertise in Child Sexual Abuse (https://www.csacentre.org.uk/\) to conduct an analysis of interventions for CSEM offenders. Key findings from the report were included in the Centre for Expertise’s submission to the Independent Inquiry on Child Sexual Abuse’s Investigation into Child Sexual Exploitation by Organised Networks. The report, published on the CECSA’s website between Feb 2018 and July 2019 had 6,263-page views from 3,965 users [5.10b]
5. Sources to corroborate the impact
5.1 Confidential Summary of Training Evaluation Data (2014-2020)
5.2 Testimonial Effective Probation Practice Manager HMPPS.
5.3 Testimonial Professor Director Universitair Forensisch Centrum, University of Antwerp.
5.4 Testimonial CEO and Executive Clinical Director of Counselling and Psychotherapy Centres Inc.
5.5 Testimonial Clinical and Forensic Psychologist (Canada)
5.6 Testimonial Senior Probation Officers North-East Probation Services
5.7 Testimonial Strategic Lead – Sexual Offending HMPPS
5.8 Testimonial The Lucy Faithfull Foundation
5.9 Testimonial Chief Executive Officer, Circles UK
5.10 Public Debate and Prevention
(a) Testimonial Home Office IIOC.
(b) Testimonial Deputy Director – Research and Evaluation Centre of expertise on child sexual abuse.
- Submitting institution
- University of Lincoln
- Unit of assessment
- 4 - Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience
- Summary impact type
- Environmental
- Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
- No
1. Summary of the impact
Social and evolutionary psychology research undertaken at the University of Lincoln on the social behaviour of Barbary macaques and human-animal relationships led to the development of actions to protect this endangered species. Through empirical research on macaques in their natural environment, University of Lincoln researchers identified key aspects of macaque welfare and the effects of human activity on their environment, leading to significant changes in international practice. These include: (1) change in international trade laws, national and increased international protection status of the Barbary macaque; (2) development and implementation of Conservation Action Plans by the Algerian and Moroccan Governments; and (3) implementation of new wildlife tourism guidelines for sustainable wildlife tourism (now used by TripAdvisor and Kuoni).
2. Underpinning research
Barbary Macaques are an endangered species with only 8-10,000 estimated monkeys to still live in the mountains of Morocco and Algeria ( http://www.barbarymacaque.org/barbary-macaque/%20the-species/ ). The University of Lincoln’s (UoL) Barbary Macaque Project was established in 2008 as the only long-term project to support conservation efforts in the Atlas Mountains of Morocco, by investigating the social behaviour of this monkey living under challenging environmental conditions. This research programme answers fundamental questions in social and evolutionary psychology, including the importance of sociality and personality for health, wellbeing and stress, cooperation and altruism, competition and warfare, and in conservation psychology, such as human-macaque interaction and welfare ( http://barbarymacaque.blogs.lincoln.ac.uk). This interdisciplinary, inter-agency programme is led by UoL, and to date has produced 56 peer reviewed articles in internationally renowned journals (all authored by UoL).
This pioneering research into macaque social behaviour was the first to highlight the importance of macaque social bonds to survive extreme winters [3.1], as well as to reduce the negative effects of stress (confirming the “social buffer hypothesis”) [3.2]. UoL research was also the first to demonstrate that the social style of the group (i.e. egalitarian or despotic) affects macaque personality dimensions [3.3]. This suite of original research has provided critical evidence for psychological understanding of the importance of cooperation, social bonds and behavioural resilience for enhancing survival, health, and the capacity to effectively cope with challenging environmental conditions.
UoL’s research has particularly highlighted the significant implications of macaque psychology, human (tourist) psychology and the interaction of the two on growing negative effects on this endangered species. Through collaboration between Majolo and Maréchal, the Project has also extended into conservation psychology and specifically on how wildlife tourism affects animal welfare and human-macaque communication [3.4, 3.5, 3.6]. Through field research in a Moroccan National Park with a considerable volume of tourists, who frequently feed the monkeys, UoL research was the first to show that interacting with tourists has negative impacts on macaque social bonds, increasing aggression between macaques and reducing pro-social behaviour [3.4]. These interactions with tourists also negatively affected macaques’ anxiety and stress levels [3.5], raising serious concerns for the role of tourists on the survival of this endangered species.
Tourist-macaque interactions can also pose a danger to tourists themselves, with monkey bites the second most common animal bite risk to travellers after dog bites (World Health Organisation, 2018). UoL-led research to understand such macaque aggression indicated that the risk of bites/scratches may be exacerbated by the misreading of macaque emotions by tourists. Human participants who had never or rarely encounter macaques were poor at discriminating between friendly, distressed and aggressive macaque facial expressions [3.6]. This study recommended interventions to improve tourist safety by enhancing their knowledge via guided visits to wildlife sites [3.6].
From the outset, this Project has required the researchers to establish close, ongoing working relationships with the Moroccan and Algerian authorities and international conservation organisations. These partnerships, together with research findings on macaque social bonds, human-macaque interaction and wildlife tourism, became the basis for the development of conservation measures and managed wildlife tourism initiatives to save the Barbary macaque from extinction.
3. References to the research
3.1 McFarland, R. and Majolo, B. (2013) Coping with the cold: predictors of survival in wild Barbary macaques, Macaca sylvanus. Biology Letters, 9 (4). ISSN 1744-9561.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2013.0428
3.2 Young, C., Majolo, B., Heistermann, M., Schülke, O. and Ostner, J. (2015) Responses to social and environmental stress are attenuated by strong male bonds in wild macaques. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. ISSN 1411450111.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1411450111
3.3 Adams, M. J., Majolo, B., Ostner, J., Schülke, O., De Marco, A., Thierry, B., Engelhardt, A., Widdig, A., Gerald, M.S. & Weiss, A. (2015) Personality structure and social style in macaques. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(2): 338–353.
https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000041
3.4 Maréchal, L., MacLarnon, A., Majolo, B., and Semple, S. (2016) Primates’ behavioural responses to tourists: evidence for a trade-off between potential risks and benefits. Scientific Reports, 6.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep32465
3.5 Maréchal, L., Semple, S., Majolo, B., Qarro, M., Heistermann, M., MacLarnon, A. (2011) Impacts of tourism on anxiety and physiological stress in wild male Barbary macaques. Biological Conservation, 144 (9): 2188-2193. ISSN 0006-3207.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2011.05.010
3.6 Maréchal, L., Levy, X., Meints, K., and Majolo, B. (2017) Experience-based human perception of facial expressions in Barbary macaques’ ( Macaca sylvanus): PeerJ, 5. e3413.
4. Details of the impact
UoL research in social and evolutionary psychology has been pivotal in identifying causes of ecological stress on macaques, including stress occurring through human disturbance. This research has fed into multiple national and international strategies to improve macaque welfare and protection, specifically leading to: (1) Change in international trade laws and policy, including a higher protection status for macaques; (2) Development and implementation of national conservation action plans and (3) New wildlife tourism guidelines used by international tourist companies .
(1) Change in International Trade Laws and Policy for Higher Protection Status of the Barbary Macaque [5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4].
UoL research has informed changes to two key legislative documents:
Increased CITES Protection Status. The Convention in International Trade in Endangered species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) is one of the largest and oldest international agreements between 183 governments, aiming to ensure that international trade in specimens of wild animals and plants does not threaten their survival. Findings from two UoL studies have been used as evidence to change the CITES protection status of the Barbary macaque from Appendix II (i.e. threatened species not currently at risk of extinction) to Appendix I (species at high risk of extinction) in 2016 [5.1]. This change means that Barbary macaques become a conservation priority for international organisations and that national guidelines to protect this species in native countries (i.e. Morocco and Algeria) are under stronger international scrutiny. As a result of CITES reclassification in 2016, the European legislation on wild fauna trade (which lays down the provisions for import, export and internal EU trade in specimens) was also upgraded in 2017 [5.2, 5.3]. The increased surveillance arising from these changes contributes to international strategies to reduce the illegal trade of endangered animals, which is the fourth most lucrative global crime (worth $7-$23 billion/year) after drugs, humans and guns traffic (source: World Economic Forum; https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/09/fighting-illegal-wildlife-and-forest-trade/).
Change in Red List of Threatened Species. Majolo was invited by IUCN and the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) to become a member of the Barbary macaque special sub-panel for the Red List of Threatened Species. The Red List is the most important international document guiding conservation strategies and laws on wildlife. Four UoL studies, and a MSc project supervised by Majolo, were cited in the reassessment of the conservation status of the Barbary macaque in 2016 (published in June 2020). UoL outputs gave new data, filling a 30-year gap, which allowed IUCN to change the geographic distribution and population size of macaques in Algeria in comparison to the previous assessment of the species (in 2008) [5.4].
(2) Development and implementation of new Conservation strategies by the Algerian and Moroccan Governments [5.3, 5.5, 5.6].
New Algerian Action Plan and Government Funding. The Algerian Conservation Plan (2018) [5.5] is the first of its kind in Algeria and sets the conservation strategy for the Barbary macaque for the next 10 years. It was produced in collaboration between UoL, the Algerian government and the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN). Majolo & Maréchal were invited by IUCN to take part in the preparation of the Action Plan, contributing both to the assessment of major threats to macaque conservation in Algeria, and to the design of evidence-based conservation guidelines. The final strategy document cites twelve Barbary Macaque Project research studies. Following the launch of this action plan, the Algerian government committed 3 million dinars (£18,000 equivalent) to reduce human-macaque conflicts and protect the species from extinction [5.6].
Implementation of Moroccan Action Plan. UoL research on macaque social bonds has supported the successful reintroduction of confiscated poached macaques back to the wild within one of the study groups in 2015 [5.3], implementing the reintroduction guidelines set in the Moroccan Action Plan.
(3) New Wildlife Tourism Guidelines used by International Tourism Companies [5.3, 5.7, 5.8, 5.9].
The Association of British Travel Agents (ABTA) produced new Wildlife Viewing guidelines in 2013, citing our 2011 research [3.5]. These are practical guides for travel businesses and suppliers of animal experiences, which aim to encourage good practice and eliminate the risks of human-macaque interactions as identified in our research. In 2017 two major international tourism companies – TripAdvisor and Kuoni - pledged to follow these guidelines. As a result of these guidelines and their uptake, these companies are now banned from sale hundreds of tours and experiences in which guests were encouraged to come into physical contact with wild or endangered animals [5.7].
Based on her expertise on human-animal interactions, Maréchal has been invited to be a member of the IUCN SSC Primate Specialist Group Human-Primate Interactions Section, in 2018. This work is particularly important for the conservation of Barbary macaques to address issues related to human-animal interactions and illegal trade. For example, Barbary macaques are often used as photo prop in primate tourism and become viral on social media, which fuels the international illegal trade of this endangered species. By increasing awareness, the work from this IUCN group is changing the behaviour of professionals working with primates [5.3].
Activities to change international guidance have been complemented by a suite of public awareness raising activities based on our research into human perception of animal emotions [3.6]. UoL developed an educational quiz reflecting key aspects of human-animal interaction, macaque emotions, and the effect of wildlife tourism [5.8]. This was run online by National Geographic Magazine and via other sites and completed by 57,000 people. In addition, Maréchal has led several successful face-to-face training events at the EU parliament in Brussels, Natural History Museum London and Skegness Aquarium Lincolnshire. These included interactive “hands-on” demonstrations of primate emotions using our developed education tool, and communication of the resulting recommended guidelines for better practice in wildlife tourism. During these training events, a total of 364 quizzes were completed, 616 members of the public from over 40 different nationalities took part (some took part as a group). 90.1% stated that they would intend to behave differently [5.9] should they encounter wild monkeys, now better understanding the difficulties of recognising primate emotions and the associated danger for both monkey and human.
5. Sources to corroborate the impact
5.1 Confirmation of transfer of the Barbary Macaque from Appendix II to Appendix I of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES).
5.2 Official Journal of the European L27_Wildlife Trade.
5.3 Testimonial letter from Dr. Sian Waters, Vice Chairs, IUCN SSC Primate Specialist Group Section on Human Primate Interactions
5.4 Reassessment of IUCN Red List entry for the Barbary Macaques https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/12561/50043570
Including Support letter from Prof. Janette Wallis, convenor of the reassessment of the IUCN Red List entry for the Barbary macaque.
5.5 Conservation Action Plan for the Barbary Macaque in Algeria prepared by the IUCN (International Union for the Conservation of Nature). Including Testimonial letter from IUCN representative (Ms. Violeta Barrios, Director of the IUCN Centre for Mediterranean Cooperation) describing the importance of Majolo & Maréchal’s research for the preparation of the Algerian Conservation Action Plan.
5.6 Article confirming commitment of government funds for the Algerian Action Plan
5.7 Confirmation TripAdvisor and KUONI changes wildlife tourism policy according to ABTA guidelines (https://www.tripadvisor.co.uk/blog/search/animal\+welfare\+education\+portal/; https://www.tripadvisor.com/blog/our-ongoing-commitment-to-animal-welfare/)
5.8 National Geographic quiz on Barbary Macaque emotion
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/animals/article/barbary-macaque-facial-expressions- quiz
5.9 Monkey face quiz data – Summary and excel file.