Skip to main

Impact case study database

The impact case study database allows you to browse and search for impact case studies submitted to the REF 2021. Use the search and filters below to find the impact case studies you are looking for.

Search and filter

Filter by

  • Aberystwyth University / Prifysgol Aberystwyth
   None selected
  • 18 - Law
   None selected
   None selected
   None selected
   None selected
   None selected
   None selected
Waiting for server
Download currently selected sections for currently selected case studies (spreadsheet) (generating)
Download currently selected case study PDFs (zip) (generating)
Download tags for the currently selected case studies (spreadsheet) (generating)
Currently displaying text from case study section
Showing impact case studies 1 to 2 of 2
Submitting institution
Aberystwyth University / Prifysgol Aberystwyth
Unit of assessment
18 - Law
Summary impact type
Societal
Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
No

1. Summary of the impact

Piotrowicz’s research has had significant impact on human trafficking law and policy in four areas:

  1. In monitoring States’ compliance with their obligations under the Council of Europe Anti-Trafficking Convention;

  2. In informing state policy;

  3. In embedding the principle of non-punishment of trafficked people in national legal systems; and

  4. In providing training and guidelines for States on the legal issues surrounding human trafficking.

This resulted in changes to laws and policies on human trafficking. He also devised and contributed to training programmes on human trafficking for public servants, NGOs, and international organisations.

2. Underpinning research

Piotrowicz’s research focuses on the legal regulation in trafficking of human beings. This research clarifies the rights of people who have been, or are at risk of being, trafficked to legal protection, and the obligations of state parties to provide such protection. It also explains the duty of States not to punish those who have been trafficked.

The underpinning research for this case study takes four forms.

First, Piotrowicz participated in the United Nations High Commission for Refugees’ (UNHCR) Global Consultations programme to discuss how best to apply the 1951 Refugees Convention to global refugee problems. As a result, he was commissioned by UNHCR to research guidelines on how refugee law can be used to assist people at risk of being trafficked. Piotrowicz’s research then formed part of the foundation of Guidelines, adopted in 2006, which are recommended to States as interpretation of their obligation to provide asylum to trafficked persons, as well as those at risk of being trafficked [3.1].

Second, Piotrowicz’s research addresses how different legal systems allow for people who have committed offences as a result of being trafficked, not to be punished, as they are not acting independently. Piotrowicz and collaborators analysed the international legal foundation of the rule, and set out guidelines to assist States to amend their laws where necessary, to respect the duty of non-punishment. Their research is conceptually based but with practical application: to avoid trafficked people being punished for offences they were forced to commit [3.2, 3.3, 3.4].

Third, Piotrowicz acted as consultant and advisor on an EU-funded project on trafficking for forced begging, focussing on Romania, Austria, Belgium, and France. Piotrowicz’s research investigated and explained how trafficking for forced begging violates the rights of victims, and how failure to prevent it may result in human rights violations, while outlining measures States should take to protect victims [3.5].

Fourth, Piotrowicz clarified the scope of the duty of legal protection. He contributed the legal section to the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) recommendations to States on cooperation with civil society [3.6] in carrying out their legal obligations to assist, support and protect trafficked people. Piotrowicz is also one of two principal authors of a “Guidance Note” [3.7] on the entitlement of trafficked persons to international protection, published by GRETA- the Council of Europe body monitoring States’ compliance with their anti-trafficking obligations- in June 2020, which elucidates States’ duty to allow trafficked people to remain in their territory if it is unsafe to return to their home countries.

3. References to the research

  1. United Nations, High Commissioner for Refugees, Guidelines on International Protection No. 7: The Application of Article 1A(2) of the 1951 Convention and/or 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees to Victims of Trafficking and Persons at Risk of Being Trafficked, HCR/GIP/06/07, 7 April 2006. (Consultant, provided expertise and draft document that resulted in the Guidelines). Available at: www.unhcr.org/uk/publications/legal/443b626b2/guidelines-international-protection-7-application-article-1a2-1951-convention.html

  2. OSCE, (2013), Policy and Legislative Recommendations towards the Effective Implementation of the Non-Punishment Provision with regard to Victims of Trafficking. See p.8. Available at: www.osce.org/secretariat/101002

  3. Piotrowicz, R. W., Sorrentino, L., (2016), ‘Human Trafficking and the Emergence of the Non-Punishment Principle’, Human Rights Law Review, 16(4): 669-699. DOI: 10.1093/hrlr/ngw028

  4. Piotrowicz, R., Rijken, C., & Uhl, B.H., (eds.), (2017), Routledge Handbook of Human Trafficking (1st ed.). (London: Routledge). DOI: 10.4324/9781315709352. Note: Principal co-editor and author of two chapters.

  5. Piotrowicz, R., Healy, C., (2014), Manual for Law Enforcement Authorities on Trafficking for Forced Begging. (Romania: Interior Ministry of Romania). Available at: http://old.mpublic.ro/ump/proiecte_finantate_ce/home_2011_isec_agthb2192/manual_thb_en.pdf

  6. OSCE, (2018), The Critical Role of Civil Society in Combating Trafficking in Human Beings. Available at: www.osce.org/secretariat/405197. Note: Contribution: one third.

  7. GRETA, (2020)06, Guidance Note on the Entitlement of Victims of Trafficking, and Persons at Risk of Being Trafficked, to International Protection. Available at: https://rm.coe.int/guidance-note-on-the-entitlement-of-victims-of-trafficking-and-persons/16809ebf44

4. Details of the impact

Human trafficking, also known as modern slavery, is a serious threat to the physical, sexual, and psychological wellbeing of its victims. This has been recognised by the major efforts of successive UK governments to fight it. Specifically, Piotrowicz’s research on trafficking has had an impact in four areas:

  1. In monitoring States’ compliance with their obligations under the Council of Europe Anti-Trafficking Convention;

  2. In informing state policy;

  3. In embedding the principle of non-punishment of trafficked people in national legal systems; and

  4. In providing training and guidelines for States on the legal issues surrounding human trafficking.

Combined, these represent a sustained and significant impact on policy and practice.

Monitoring state compliance – In 2012, Piotrowicz was elected to GRETA. In 2017, Piotrowicz was then elected Second Vice-President, and in 2019 he was elected First Vice-President [5.1]. In this executive role, and informed by his research, Piotrowicz helped to shape the agenda and decide priorities for GRETA’s work. His work has been recognised by the Executive Secretary of GRETA:

Prof. Piotrowicz has been a very active member of GRETA, both in its monitoring work and in contributing to the development of its policies. Both of these activities directly influence the actions of States in assisting trafficked people and prosecuting the perpetrators. [5.1]

International guidelines and European policy informed by Piotrowicz’s research is extensively referred to in GRETA country monitoring reports [5.2.a; 5.1]. Piotrowicz’s research for the UNHCR human trafficking Guidelines had a direct impact on how States help trafficking victims, and those at risk of being trafficked, and influenced the development of policy in this area. The Guidelines have been cited in court judgments [5.3; 5.4], and extensively in the country monitoring reports of GRETA from 2014 to 2020 [5.2.a; 5.2.b], with the objective of persuading States to implement their duty to protect trafficked persons, as well as in UNHCR training packages [5.5; 5.1].
Informing state policy - As a member of GRETA, Piotrowicz made nine country monitoring visits from 2014 to 2020 [5.2.a]. The recommendations adopted after these visits must be implemented by the country concerned to fulfil its anti-trafficking obligations. Accordingly, his country-monitoring work, using expertise learned from his research in this area, directly impacted on States’ anti-trafficking laws and policies [5.2.a]. Additionally, the UNHCR human trafficking Guidelines have been cited in court judgments in the UK [5.3.a-d] and Advisory Opinions of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in 2014 [5.4].
Embedding the principle of non-punishment - Piotrowicz’s report for the Special Coordinator for Anti-Trafficking of the OSCE on the non-punishment of victims of trafficking was cited in guidance for States published by the United Nations (UN) on 15 June 2020 [5.6], in policy statements by the UN Special Rapporteur on Trafficking in Human Beings in April and June 2020 [5.7.a; 5.7.b], by the UK government on 21 March 2016 [5.8.a], and by the UN Inter-Agency Coordination Group against Trafficking in Persons (ICAT) in 2016 and 2018 [5.8.b.i; 5.8.b.ii].

Piotrowicz’s work for the OSCE in developing the policy of non-punishment of trafficked persons was also extensively referenced in GRETA’s country reports between 2015 and 2020 [5.2.a]. All GRETA country reports between 2015 and 2020 refer to the OSCE policy of non-punishment of trafficked persons [5.1] as guidance for States. For the Head of International Migration Law at the International Organization for Migration, Piotrowicz’s work:

has contributed to the evolution of this principle and its wider acceptance in national legal systems. I constantly refer to his work in my activities both research and advocacy related and can for certain attest to the impact his work has had in this field. [5.9]

Providing training and guidelines for States on the legal issues surrounding human trafficking - The UNHCR trafficking Guidelines were cited by the UK government in 2016 [5.8.a], and by the UN Inter-Agency Coordination Group against Trafficking in Persons (ICAT) in 2016 and 2018 [5.8.b.i; 5.8.b.ii]. They have also been used in UNHCR training packages on human trafficking [5.5]. Piotrowicz also devised training programmes in migration law across Europe, organised by the Council of Europe, International Organization for Migration (IOM), and the European Union, for personnel working in anti-trafficking roles, such as immigration officials and non-governmental organisations [5.1]. The Head of International Migration Law at IOM highlights that participants confirm that the training increases their ‘understanding and awareness of the legal complexities of human trafficking’ [5.9], which is reflected in their work.

Piotrowicz was appointed adviser to the Government of Romania on an international project aimed at preventing trafficking of people for forced begging. The appointment was made after open competition, based on his research and experience in the area. His work led to the publication of a handbook [3.1] for police and judicial authorities on dealing with trafficking for forced begging, published in English, French, German and Romanian.

In conclusion, Piotrowicz’s work has significantly informed policy on human trafficking in Europe, globally and in individual countries. The UK Home Office’s Deputy Director of Modern Slavery confirms that Piotrowicz’s ‘contribution and continued commitment in this field [modern slavery and human trafficking] has been hugely valuable’ [5.10].

5. Sources to corroborate the impact

  1. Executive Secretary, the Council of Europe Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings (GRETA) confirms Piotrowicz’s significant contribution to GRETA’s work, letter 25 October 2019.

  2. GRETA reports:

  3. Country monitoring reports from 2014 – 2020. One or two reports for each of 47 States and reports as co-rapporteur for i) Macedonia, (2014)12 and (2017)39; ii) Germany, (2015)10; iii) Kosovo (2015)37; iv) Denmark (2016)7; v) Malta (2017)3; vi) Greece (2017)27; vii) Switzerland (2019)14; viii) Czech Republic (2020)01 and ix) Croatia (2020)10. Available at: www.coe.int/en/web/anti-human-trafficking/country-monitoring-work

  4. Example of country monitoring report referring to UNHCR and OSCE Guidelines. GRETA (2016)21, Report concerning the implementation of the Council of Europe Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings by the United Kingdom: Second Evaluation Round. (Strasbourg: Council of Europe); para 255 and footnote 152 refer to UNHCR human trafficking Guidelines [3.6]; para 291 and footnote 163 refer to OSCE Policy and Legislative Recommendations [3.2]. Available at: https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDCTMContent?documentId=09000016806abcdc

  5. GRETA (2020)05, Evaluation Report Austria: Third evaluation round; Access to justice and effective remedies for victims of trafficking in human beings, 10 June 2020; III, para16, footnote 10 refers to OSCE recommendations on the role of civil society in helping trafficking victims [3.5]. Available at: https://rm.coe.int/greta-2020-03-fgr-auten/16809eb4fd

  6. UK Courts and Tribunals:

  7. COURT OF SESSION, OUTER HOUSE: LY also known as YZ (or ZY) Petitioner against The Secretary of State for the Home Office Respondent 2019 Scot (D) 16/2, [2019] CSOH; para 11 refers to UNHCR human trafficking Guidelines [3.6]. Available at:

www.scotcourts.gov.uk/docs/default-source/cos-general-docs/pdf-docs-for-opinions/2019csoh13.pdf?sfvrsn=0

  1. UPPER TRIBUNAL: HD (Trafficked Women) CG [2016] UKUT 454 (IAC); paras 21 and 22 cite OSCE Policy and Legislative Recommendations [3.2]. Available at:

www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/IAC/2016/454.html

  1. UK UPPER TRIBUNAL: HVT v Secretary of State for the Home Department, 8 October 2018, Appeal number PA/03104/2017 (IAC); para 21 refers to UNHCR human trafficking Guidelines [3.6]. Available at: https://tribunalsdecisions.service.gov.uk/utiac/pa-03104-2017

  2. UK UPPER TRIBUNAL: TVP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, 12 November 2018, Appeal number PA/02997/2018 (IAC); para 53 refers to UNHCR human trafficking Guidelines [3.6]. Available at: https://tribunalsdecisions.service.gov.uk/utiac/pa-02997-2018

  3. Inter-American Court of Human Rights: Advisory Opinion OC-21/14, Rights and Guarantees of Children in the Context of Migration and/or in need of International Protection, 19 August 2014. Para 92 refers to UNHCR human trafficking Guidelines [3.7]. Available at:

https://www.refworld.org/cases,IACRTHR,54129c854.html

  1. UNHCR Training packages:

  2. UNHCR, SGBV Prevention and Response (2016); Module 15, p.4, p.11, and Handout 2 refer to the UNHCR human trafficking Guidelines [3.6]. Available at: www.unhcr.org/publications/manuals/583577ed4/sgbv-prevention-response-training-package.html

  3. UNHCR, Overview of UNHCR and Concepts of International Protection, 20 December 2019; p.4, point 5 refers to UNHCR human trafficking Guidelines [3.6]. Available at: www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/document/foia/UNHCR_Overview_of_UNHCR_and_Concepts_of_Refugee_Protection_RAIO.pdf

  4. UN Guidance - UN, Working Group on Trafficking in Persons against Transnational Organized Crime, Guidance on the issue of appropriate criminal justice responses to victims who have been compelled to commit offences as a result of their being trafficked, CTOC/COP/WG.4/2020/2,15 June 2020: para 20 and footnote 5; para 61 and footnote 15; and para 69 refer to OSCE Policy and Legislative Recommendations [3.2]. Available at: www.unodc.org/documents/treaties/WG_TIP/WEBSITE/CTOC_COP_WG.4_2020_2/CTOC_COP-WG.4_2020_2_E.pdf

  5. UNHRC- Special Rapporteur on trafficking in persons, especially women and children:

  6. Trafficking in persons, especially women and children, A/HRC/44/45, 6 April 2020; paras 29, 30 and 32, and footnotes 38, 40, 41 and 55 refer to UNHCR human trafficking Guidelines [3.6] and OSCE Policy and Legislative Recommendations [3.2]. Available at: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3870710?ln=en

  7. Giammarinaro, M. G., The importance of implementing the non-punishment provision: the obligation to protect victims, June 2020; paras 4, 5,11,18, 24, 26, 34, 36 to 38, 41, 44 and footnotes 13 to16, 33, 42, 45, 48 to 50, and 54 refer to OSCE Policy and Legislative Recommendations [3.2]. Available at: https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Trafficking/Non-Punishment-Paper.pdf

  8. Policy papers:

  9. United Kingdom, Home Office, Victims of modern slavery – Competent Authority Guidance, 21 March 2016; p.30 refers to UNHCR human trafficking Guidelines [3.6]. Available at: www.antislaverycommissioner.co.uk/media/1059/victims_of_modern_slavery_-_competent_authority_guidance_v3_0.pdf

  10. UN Inter-Agency Coordination Group against Trafficking in Persons (ICAT):

  11. Providing Effective Remedies for Victims of Trafficking in Persons, (2016); footnotes 29 and 75 refer to UNHCR human trafficking Guidelines [3.6]. Available at: www.unodc.org/documents/human-trafficking/ICAT/ICAT_Policy_Paper_3._Providing_Effective_Remedies_for_Victims_of_Trafficking_in_Persons_2016.pdf

  12. A Toolkit for Guidance in Designing and Evaluating Counter-Trafficking Programmes: Harnessing Accumulated knowledge to Respond to Trafficking in Persons (2016); p.75 refers to UNHCR human trafficking Guidelines [3.6]. Available at: https://respect.international/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/A-Toolkit-for-guidance-in-designing-and-evaluating-counter-trafficking-programmes-ICAT-2016.pdf

  13. Head, International Migration Law, International Organization for Migration, confirms the influential significance of Piotrowicz’s work for the field of human trafficking, letter 18 October 2019.

  14. Deputy Director, Modern Slavery, Serious and Organised Crime Group, Home Office, confirms Piotrowicz’s contribution to tackling modern slavery and human trafficking, letter 3 February 2021.

Submitting institution
Aberystwyth University / Prifysgol Aberystwyth
Unit of assessment
18 - Law
Summary impact type
Societal
Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
No

1. Summary of the impact

Research produced by the Dewis Choice team challenged previous responses to Domestic Violence and Abuse (DVA) which assumed gendered violence only occurs in women under 45 years old. The Dewis Choice Initiative improved access to justice and wellbeing for older victim-survivors of DVA across Wales, through the delivery of a unique co-produced justice and welfare service, which safeguarded older victim-survivors; informed more effective provision and delivery of public services for older victim-survivors of DVA across the UK; and informed national guidance and campaigns within Wales on the protection and safeguarding of older people.

2. Underpinning research

Domestic Violence and Abuse (DVA) occurring in later life sits under an umbrella term ‘elder abuse’ which serves to marginalise older victim-survivors. Our research shows the discourse in this context is ageist and sexist, contributing towards discriminatory responses by professionals [3.2; 3.3; 3.4]. It highlights the importance of framing the significant harms as DVA, not elder abuse, to ensure equality of opportunity, access to justice and improved quality of life for people aged 60 years and over.

The Evaluation of the Access to Justice Project (2012) was the first study to examine, from a multi-agency perspective, justice, and human rights for older victim-survivors of DVA. Our evidence shows older victim-survivors were diverted away from accessing traditional criminal and civil justice responses when compared to other age groups [3.2; 3.4]. Practitioner responses ‘welfarised’ older people and, in most cases, individuals were denied the right to make informed choices. Our research revealed that basic human rights had been overlooked [3.2; 3.4], leading to severe discriminatory practices and an increase in harm, particularly in cases where victim-survivors of DVA lacked capacity [3.1].

These findings led to pan-Wales research by Wydall and Zerk ‘Crimes against and abuse of older people in Wales’ (2013), investigating police, health and social care responses [3.18]. The research suggests the existence of DVA in later life is not recognised by many statutory agents. The findings also highlighted a knowledge gap about coercive control and safeguarding processes. Further, responses for older victim-survivors were often restricted to single agencies who lacked knowledge about how to support the complex needs of older victim-survivors [3.4; 3.5]. This large-scale study [3.18] brought into focus the systemic invisibility of older victim-survivors ‘lived experiences’ in DVA research, policy and practice [3.3; 3.7]. This research and the wider literature highlighted the need for longitudinal research of older survivors’ help-seeking experiences to generate important data to inform future service development and training. As a result of evidencing this deficit in research and limited use of longitudinal co-produced methodologies in this field [3.1 to 3.5], significant funding has been awarded to support the Dewis Choice initiative [3.9 to 3.16].

The focus is two-fold. First, as our research recognised the need for the genuine involvement of older victim-survivors [3.5; 3.7], Dewis Choice was co-created with older people, a new service that integrates approaches to justice and wellbeing, for which Wydall was awarded a 2016 National Award for transformative research [3.17]. Second, it is the first global, longitudinal, prospective study to examine older victim-survivor’s decision-making from a human rights perspective as they seek protection and access to justice. This qualitative research gave voice to older female and male narratives, producing training that enables public services to recognise and respond to gaps in practice, and acknowledge the prevalence, nature, and diversity of need in later-life [3.3; 3.5; 3.6; 3.7].

Findings from the longitudinal research highlighted discriminatory practices [3.1; 3.2; 3.4; 3.5] which led to the publication and dissemination of 2000 copies of practitioner guidance [3.19]. Furthermore, face-to-face training, including an LGBTQ short film [3.20], was also delivered to 8,046 individuals, including safeguarding practitioners, across the UK. In response to Covid-19 the team developed bite-size online training, which was completed by 383 practitioners between April and December 2020.

Further research funded by Comic Relief examines the co-existence of dementia and DVA [3.11; 3.13; 3.14]. This and other funding [3.11; 3.12; 3.14; 3.15; 3.16] has led to the development of UK-wide inter-disciplinary research involving academics and external partners.

3. References to the research

  1. Williams, J., Wydall, S., Clarke, A. H. (2013), Protecting older victims of abuse who lack capacity: the role of the Independent Mental Capacity Advocate, Elder Law Journal, 3(2): 167-174.

  2. Clarke, A., Williams, J., Wydall, S. (2016), Access to Justice for Victims/Survivors of Elder Abuse: A Qualitative Study, Social Policy & Society,15 (2): 207-220. DOI : 10.1017/S1474746415000202

  3. Wydall, S., Zerk, R. (2017), Domestic abuse and older people: Factors influencing help- seeking, The Journal of Adult Protection, 19(5): 247-260. DOI:10.1108/JAP-03-2017-0010

  4. Wydall, S., Clarke, A., Williams, J., Zerk, Z. (2018), Domestic Abuse and Elder Abuse in Wales: A Tale of Two Initiatives, British Journal of Social Work, 48(4): 962–981. DOI: 10.1093/bjsw/bcy056

  5. Wydall, S., Clarke, A., Williams, J., Zerk, R. (July 2019), Dewis Choice: A Welsh Initiative promoting justice for older victim-survivors of domestic abuse, in Bows, H. (ed.), Violence Against Older Women Volume II: Responses, Springer Nature, (2): 13-36 24. (Palgrave Studies in Victims and Victimology). DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-16597-0

  6. Wydall, S., & Freeman, E. (2019), Older People and Domestic Violence and Abuse. In: Ali P., McGarry J. (eds.), Domestic Violence in Health Contexts: A Guide for Healthcare Professionals. (Switzerland: Springer Nature). DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-29361-1_7

Funding Awarded
  1. Evaluation of the Access to Justice Pilot: Welsh Government: (2012-2013): Award: GBP25,000. Clarke (PI) Wydall (Co-I); Williams (Co-I)

  2. All Wales, Domestic Abuse and Hate Crime Study: Older People’s Commissioner, Wales: (2014-2015): Award: GBP24,540. Wydall (PI).

1.  *Dewis Choice Elder Abuse and Justice*: National Lottery – Community Fund \- Big Innovation Fund: \(2015\-2018\): Award GBP895,687. Wydall, S., Clark, A., & Williams, J., \(PI’s\). 

  1.  *Transforming the response to domestic abuse in later life*: UK Portfolio \`Accelerating Ideas’: \(2019\-2022\): Award GBP453,624. Wydall \(PI\). 

    1.  *Dementia, Domestic Violence and Abuse*: Comic Relief: \(2019\-2020\): Award: GBP69,937. Wydall \(PI\). 

      1.  *New Spaces and Networks in building the response to elder abuse*: National Community Fund: \(2020\-2021\): Award: GBP99,998. Wydall \(PI\). 

        1.  *Developing legal protection and social embeddedness when domestic abuse and dementia co\-exist*: Comic Relief: \(2020\-2021\): Award GBP76,678. Wydall \(PI\). 

          1.  *Creating safer spaces and building social connectivity during Covid19*: Comic Relief Emergency COVID\-19 Fund: \(2020\-2021\): Award GBP39,544. Wydall \(PI\). 

            1.  *Responding to older victim\-survivors of domestic and sexual violence during COVID\-19*: Ministry of Justice: \(2020\-2021\): Award GBP12,656. Wydall \(PI\). 

3.16 Responding to older victim-survivors of domestic and sexual violence during COVID-19 stage 2: Ministry of Justice: (2020-2021): Award GBP10,277. Wydall (PI).

Awards

3.17 The Audrey Jones Memorial Award for Feminist Scholarship (2016). The Women’s Assembly, Wales. ‘Undertaking transformative research with female victim-survivors of domestic abuse: A story of feminist praxis in Wales.’ Wydall, S., The Dewis/Choice Project.

Report

3.18 Wydall, S., Zerk R., 2015, ‘ Crimes against & Abuse of Older People in Wales' commissioned by the Older People's Commissioner. Available: www.olderpeoplewales.com/Libraries/Uploads/Access_to_support_and_justice_-_working_together_report.sflb.ashx

Dissemination Material

3.19 Wydall, S., Freeman, E., Zerk, R. (2020), Transforming the response to domestic abuse in later life: Dewis Choice Practitioner Guidance. (Llandysul: Gomer Press).

3.20 ‘Do You See Me?’ film. Available: https://vimeo.com/480341350.

4. Details of the impact

Impacts on the health and wellbeing of people

Dewis Choice provides a unique service across Wales, as the only route for older people experiencing Domestic Violence and Abuse (DVA). Referrals were received from Cardiff, Carmarthenshire, and Mid-West Wales Safeguarding Leads from March 2015 [5.1.a]; and pan-Wales from July 2020 to present [5.2.a], as part of the Mid-West Wales Regional Pathway to Support [5.3], for example. Dewis Choice provides tailored support for older victim-survivors of DVA, which address gaps in DVA services, and improves justice-seeking responses. This reduces the risk of DVA and future harm, and changes and enhances the lives of the older victim-survivors supported.

Older victim-survivors supported by Dewis Choice reported that: ‘ the project has helped me… Escape. Restart my life’ [5.4.a]; and ‘ [i]t actually change[d] my life and I can’t emphasise that enough’ [5.4.b]; another client reported that it ‘ had a big effect on my quality of life … for years and years I just shut up about the domestic violence but after Dewis I was able to talk about this experience’ [5.4.c]. Dewis Choice clients report the service was life-changing and life-saving: ‘ Don’t think I would have coped without the choice support workers there when I escaped. They helped me when I was leaving and called the police. I don’t think I would have survived because of the threat he posed to me’ [5.4.a] Another client explained: ‘without them [Dewis Choice] you know its no lie I would have given in on myself because I couldn’t cope’ [5.4.d].

Impacts on practitioners and delivery of professional services

Dewis Choice also informed more effective provision and delivery of public services for older victim-survivors of DVA across the UK. For example, the largest UK provider of DVA training, SafeLives, embedded Dewis Choice training into its practitioner training [5.5], including practitioner training funded by the Welsh Government and Home Office [5.6]. The SafeLives

Programme Lead confirms that Dewis Choice training ‘had an indelible impact on the learners [practitioners] and how they have developed their practice going forward. Feedback from attendees has consistently included how it has enabled them to work differently with older victims and improve their agencies response’ [5.6].

Furthermore, training across Scotland provided regional safety partnerships - including health and social care, police, and third sector organisations - with a greater understanding of older people and DVA. It enabled them to have confidence in identifying and reporting suspected abuse, and to be able to work with other organisations to better support older people. The training highlighted that organisations ‘previously had limited information of the fact that older people are not able to share their experiences or feel unable to disclose the abuse they are experiencing’ [5.7.a], and ‘ influenced the way services … work[ed] with older people and how we sometimes prioritise their physical needs against their emotional needs’ [5.7a]. The safeguarding practitioners trained examined their practices and set down actions to improve their practices and service responses for older people [5.7.b]. Dewis Choice influenced how safeguarding practitioners viewed older victim-survivors and how additional support could be offered and committed to ‘continuously improving … practice for the ageing population’ [5.7.c].

Impacts on public policy, law, and services

Dewis Choice also contributed to Welsh Government committees, documents, and campaigns. Including Welsh Government National Safeguarding Guidance, crucial for Adult Safeguarding, which helps better support and respond to older people experiencing abuse [5.2.b; 5.2.c; 5.2.d]. As members of OPC strategic and working groups, Dewis Choice inform guidance and help protect older people from DVA [5.2.a]. The OPC nominated Wydall for the Audrey Jones Memorial Award in respect of the work undertaken in conjunction with the OPC’s office [5.2.c].

The Mid-West Wales Regional DVA Strategy highlights Dewis Choice as a project to ‘be considered when considering overall regional response to domestic abuse, sexual violence and violence against women’ [5.1.c]. The Regional Strategic Lead reports that:

The impact that the Dewis Choice Project has had for older people who have experienced abuse and their families is unmeasurable. … the work and research the project is producing has and will continue to have, a profound and ground breaking impact on the understanding and awareness of the abuse experienced by older people, as well as the development and improvement of the responses and support available. [5.1.b]

Furthermore, Dewis Choice led to the Dyfed-Powys Police Crime Commissioner (PCC) incorporating the needs of older people experiencing DVA into the Dyfed-Powys PCC Police and Crime Plan 2017-2021 [5.8], making older people and DVA a key priority for the Force area. The Police Crime Commissioner reports: ‘Dyfed Powys Police joined forces with the team in 2018 in issuing referrals to their unique Service through Goleudy and our Victim and Witness Service, increasing access to justice for older victim-survivors within our community’ [5.8].

In response to Covid-19, Dewis Choice provided online training, which was endorsed by the OPC who ‘ urged those who may come into contact with older people through their work to use the training course to ensure they have the skills and knowledge they need to recognise potential abuse and ensure that people get the help and support they need’ [5.2.a]. This resource was incorporated into the Wales Victim Prevention Unit COVID-19 resource pack for safeguarding practitioners and service providers [5.2.a, 5.9]; and in a Public Health Wales briefing on COVID-19 and violence for the World Health Organization, Europe [5.10].

As a member of Welsh Government and OPC’s Action Groups, Dewis Choice contributed to Welsh Government campaigns, including, the Welsh Government Protecting and Safeguarding Older People: Covid-19 Information Pack, the You Are Not Alone campaign, and Homes Should Be A Safe Space campaign [5.2.a]. The OPC reports that Dewis Choice is ‘changing the world and making a real difference…I personally value what you are doing to transform older people’s lives and it's probably no exaggeration to say to save lives as well’ [5.2.b].

5. Sources to corroborate the impact

  1. Regional DVA Leads confirm Dewis Choice’s contribution to the regional DVA response.

a) Senior Safeguarding Officer, Carmarthenshire, email 14 December 2020; b) Regional Adviser, Mid and West Wales, letter 28 June 2019; c) Mid & West Wales Regional Safeguarding Board, VAWDASV Strategy, July 2018; see p.48. Available: www.cysur.wales/regional-policies-procedures

  1. Older People’s Commissioner (OPC) for Wales confirms Dewis Choice’s contribution to the Commissioner’s work. a) OPC, letter 27 November 2020; b) Transcript, OPC speech, 19 February 2020; c) OPC, letter 12 February 2016; d) Welsh Government, Information and guidance on domestic abuse: Safeguarding older people in Wales, 2017. Available at: www.olderpeoplewales.com/Libraries/Uploads/safeguarding-older-people-in-wales.sflb.ashx See also 3.18, and 3.19, foreword.

  2. Mid and West Wales Violence against Women, Domestic Abuse and Sexual Violence Regional Pathway to Support, April 2020. Available at: www.cysur.wales/vawdasv/

`Mid and West Wales VAWDASV Regional Pathway to Support’

  1. Dewis Choice clients confirm the support they received and the difference it made to their lives. a) Feedback Dewis Choice client 19; b) Feedback Dewis Choice client 36; c) Feedback Dewis Choice client 38; d) Interview transcript Dewis Choice client 40.

  2. SafeLives confirms a training module was developed alongside Dewis Choice. Available at: https://safelives.org.uk/training/responding_to_older_people_training

  3. Emails, Senior Training Co-ordinator, and Programme Lead, SafeLives, between 18 December 2019 and 19 January 2021.

  4. Scottish Local Authority officials confirm the contribution of Dewis Choice training for regional safety partnerships’ work with older people experiencing DVA across Scotland, emails and letters, 19 May to 19 June 2020. a) Protection Officer, Argyll & Bute, letter 19 May 2020; b) Independent Chair Adult Support Protection Committees, letter 29 May 2020; c) Head of Integration, Falkirk Adult Protection, letter 19 June 2020.

  5. Dyfed-Powys (DP), Police and Crime Commissioner (PCC) confirms Dewis Choice’s contribution for older people experiencing DVA in the Dyfed-Powys Force area. a) Letter, DP PCC, 26 November 2020; b), Dyfed-Powys PCC Police and Crime Plan (2017-2021). See p.15. Available at: www.dyfedpowys-pcc.org.uk/media/2007/dyfed-powys-police-plan-final-eng.pdf

  6. Wales Violence Prevention Unit, COVID-19: Harm and abuse of older people. Available at: www.violencepreventionwales.co.uk/covid-19-harm-and-abuse-of-older-people

5.10 Emails, Communications Officer, Public Health Wales, between 6 and 11 May 2020.

Showing impact case studies 1 to 2 of 2

Filter by higher education institution

UK regions
Select one or more of the following higher education institutions and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No higher education institutions found.
Institutions

Filter by unit of assessment

Main panels
Select one or more of the following units of assessment and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No unit of assessments found.
Units of assessment

Filter by continued case study

Select one or more of the following states and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.

Filter by summary impact type

Select one or more of the following summary impact types and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.

Filter by impact UK location

UK Countries
Select one or more of the following UK locations and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No UK locations found.
Impact UK locations

Filter by impact global location

Continents
Select one or more of the following global locations and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No global locations found.
Impact global locations

Filter by underpinning research subject

Subject areas
Select one or more of the following underpinning research subjects and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No subjects found.
Underpinning research subjects