Skip to main

Impact case study database

The impact case study database allows you to browse and search for impact case studies submitted to the REF 2021. Use the search and filters below to find the impact case studies you are looking for.

Search and filter

Filter by

  • University of Northumbria at Newcastle
   None selected
  • 32 - Art and Design: History, Practice and Theory
   None selected
   None selected
   None selected
   None selected
   None selected
   None selected
Waiting for server
Download currently selected sections for currently selected case studies (spreadsheet) (generating)
Download currently selected case study PDFs (zip) (generating)
Download tags for the currently selected case studies (spreadsheet) (generating)
Currently displaying text from case study section
Showing impact case studies 1 to 6 of 6
Submitting institution
University of Northumbria at Newcastle
Unit of assessment
32 - Art and Design: History, Practice and Theory
Summary impact type
Cultural
Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
No

1. Summary of the impact

There has been a recent expansion in genre-film festivals across Europe that focus on horror, sci-fi, and fantasy. Yet despite their growing economic importance as cultural attractions, these events are often forced to operate within tight financial constraints, largely due to the popular misconceptions of funders and mainstream audiences regarding the ‘cult’ subject matter. Working with three leading European genre-film festivals, Northumbria University’s research informed new educational programming which transformed the profile, reputation, and financial sustainability of Kurja Polt in Slovenia, Offscreen in Belgium, and Abertoir in Wales. The festival-tailored, comprehensive educational activities increased genre-film fan engagement and attendance, attracted expert speakers, and enabled the festivals to promote professional validation for genre-film artists and genre film culture more broadly. Kurja Polt has become one of the fastest growing and most significant international film festivals in Slovenia and is regarded as an exemplar of good practice.

2. Underpinning research

Genre and cult cinema are notoriously difficult to define. Historically prodigious production levels and varied geographical origins have meant drawing boundaries around what counts as cult- or genre-film is a complex, fluid, and ephemeral process. Combined with the nature of the subject matter that genre-film typically explores, this complexity has led to accusations of creative irrelevance among funding bodies and film professionals [ R1]. In response, research undertaken by the ‘Moving Image, Popular Media and Culture’ Research Group at Northumbria, has demonstrated the cultural, political, and social value of genre-cinema and the important function of genre-film festivals in sharing those insights with the public at large.

From 2011 to 2018, research by Dr Russ Hunter, Dr Steven Jones, and Dr Jamie Sexton provided new historical and contextual analyses of the horror and fantasy genre and cult film, whilst also addressing how manifestations of popular culture in cinema can be understood to have cinematic, cultural, and socio-historical significance [ R1-R5]. Sexton’s contribution to Cult Cinema (2011), a co-edited monograph with Ernest Mathijs (University of British Columbia), examined theories and historical developments of cult cinema, as well as its often-problematic reception [ R1]. Similarly, Jones’ research explored and critiqued the tendency to use emotive labels in relation to specific types of extreme film genres, including labels of a pornographic or extremely violent nature [ R2]. Hunter’s exploration of Italian horror stressed that ostensibly generic forms of cinema can allude to, and reflect upon, significant socio-historical events, such as specific environmental concerns [ R3-R5]. Such findings are meaningful for the Italian genre-film scene, and that of its European counterparts, as they illuminate the socio-political value of an industry that, despite a dedicated albeit small fan-base, is routinely under-appreciated and consequently under-funded.

Insights gained from [ R1-R5] informed Hunter’s decision to conduct research into the genre-film festival sector itself. Through this work, Hunter demonstrated that the growth of identity-based festivals has led to an ongoing reappraisal of their significance [ R6]. Furthermore, he uncovered specific differences between the programming imperatives of genre-film festivals and other festivals [ R6]. Whilst there are several examples of large, well-funded genre-film festivals in Europe, for the most part they operate on small budgets that restrict the breadth of their offering and impact upon the wider cultural scene. Hunter’s 2018 study examined the economic sustainability of film festivals and how the nature of genre-film fandom affects festival programming and film circulation, as well as audience identities and engagement. The findings indicated that genre audiences are particularly receptive to ‘added value’, in terms of supplementary festival activity and content that present genre-films not simply as entertainment but as creative works that deserve critical analysis, attention, and wider acknowledgement as creative outputs [ R6].

Together, these research insights informed ongoing work by the Northumbria team with genre-film festivals across Europe, particularly those that give specific attention to the horror genre – Offscreen (Brussels, Belgium), Abertoir (Aberystwyth, Wales), and, in particular, Kurja Polt (Ljubljana, Slovenia). At a time when critics have been arguing that festivals in general are unsustainable, these collaborations enabled the festival stakeholders to better understand the dynamics of their sustainability and the commercial necessity of developing rigorous, supplementary educational activities, informed by critical film analysis, to attract larger audiences and open up new sources of funding.

3. References to the research

R1. Jamie Sexton, and Mathijs, E.* (eds) Cult Cinema: An Introduction, (Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011) ISBN: 9781405173735. Available on request

R2. Steve Jones (2016) ‘“Extreme” Porn? The implications of a label’ Porn Studies 3:295-307 https://doi.org/10.1080/23268743.2016.1196011

R3. Russ Hunter ‘Nightmare cities: Italian horror cinema and environmental discourses’ in Hunt, L., Lockyer, S. and Williamson, M. (eds) Screening the Undead: Vampires and Zombies in Film and Television (London: I. B. Tauris, 2013) ISBN: 9781848859241. Available on request

R4. Russ Hunter ‘Preferisco l’inferno: Early Italian horror cinema’ in Baschiera, S. and Hunter, R. (eds) Italian Horror Cinema (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2016) 15-29 ISBN: 9781474419680. Available on request

R5. Russ Hunter (2017) ‘I have a picture of the Monster!’: Il mostro di Frankenstein and the search for Italian horror cinema’ Journal of Italian of Cinema and Media Studies 5 (2):159-172 https://doi.org/10.1386/jicms.5.2.159_1

R6. Russ Hunter ‘Genre Film Festivals and Rethinking the Definition of “The Festival Film”’ in Jenkins, T. (ed) International Film Festivals: Contemporary Cultures and History Beyond Venice and Cannes (London: I. B. Tauris, 2018) ISBN: 9781788310901. Available on request

*External collaborators: E. Mathijs, University of British Columbia

4. Details of the impact

Northumbria’s research led directly to the creation of new festival-tailored educational programming that has enhanced the practices, profile, and financial sustainability of three leading, European genre-film festivals, specifically those that give particular attention to exploring and promoting the horror genre. This work allowed the festival management teams to better promote genre-film culture (including transforming one festival, Kurja Polt, into one of the most significant international film festivals in Slovenia), and provided genre-film artists (directors, screenwriters) with a new sense of professional validation and recognition.

1) Improved provision, profile, and financial sustainability of genre-film festivals

1.1 Kurja Polt - Slovenia

Slovenia has a nascent film culture in terms of film education [ E1]. The task of broadening film knowledge has largely fallen to genre-film festivals. As Maša Peče (Programme Director, Kurja Polt) points out, it is a challenge for organisations that operate on limited budgets and who often ‘ live in the shadow’ of more traditional, mainstream cinema [ E1]. Established in 2014 and based in Ljubljana, Kurja Polt (Slovenian for ‘goosebumps’), is an annually-held horror film festival, run in collaboration with the Slovenian Cinematheque (the national film museum and member of the International Federation of Film Archives). Research from Northumbria directly led to the creation of new, festival-tailored educational programming and since 2017, Kurja Polt ‘ has emerged as the only festival in Slovenia that draws upon and actively involves esteemed academic [including from Northumbria] /industry experts in film theory’ [ E1]. The successful developments resulting from the research collaboration, have been praised by the state funding body (Slovenian Film Centre), by prominent municipal institutions such as Kinodvor (one of the largest in Slovenia, that serves a dual role as the country’s principal film festival hub and a major film educational centre), and festival attendees themselves [ E1].

As Peče confirmed, ‘ the contribution of the Northumbria team has been so important [providing] … key insights that shaped our strategy with regards to how we pitch/promote ourselves, and the type of activities we offer’ [ E1]. The research gave the festival team a better ‘ understanding of the centrality of ancillary events for genre fans’, that led to new educational activities including the first ‘Cult Film Conference’ in 2017 [ E1]. As Peče outlined, the conference ‘ has continued every year since as an embedded element of our programme, raising our international profile and attracting a growing number of experts from across the globe’ [ E1]. For example, during his attendance at Kurja Polt in 2019, Markus Keuschnigg (Artistic Director of Austrian Film Festival SLASH), stated that ‘ we [the wider genre-film scene] should do more of this – serious, theoretically driven talks’ [ E1].

The expanded festival programme was also very well received by the creative artists whose work the festival showcases. The professional validation that Kurja Polt is able to provide is one of its main achievements [ E1]. As an example, genre-film director Monica Stambrini, was invited by Kurja Polt to attend as guest of honour in 2018, but despite longstanding experience in the field, Stambrini explained how she was still ‘ apprehensive’ about presenting her work due to concerns over whether a festival audience would be able to contextualise it (because of the graphic and violent nature of its content). She confirmed, however, that ‘ what made a considerable impact upon [her] decision, ultimately, to attend the festival … was the presence of the cult film conference’ [ E2]. Having been directed towards Jones’ research, which explored the problems of presumptive film labelling (presented at Kurja Polt in 2017), she recognised how Jones’ insights were ‘ prescient for my own work …[and] that the festival was the right environment for my work’ [ E2].

The expanded programme had a ‘ critical and manifold’ impact on the sustainability of Kurja Polt, contributing ‘ to a 20% increase in festival attendance since 2016 with close to 1,400 attending the most recent festival in 2019’ [ E1]. Peče emphasised that these are ‘ enviable statistics especially when viewed in context’ [ E1]. Slovenia is a small country with only 2,000,000 inhabitants. Moreover, specialized genre-film festivals always attract audiences that are smaller compared with mainstream cinema events [ E1]. Kurja Polt confirmed ‘[we are] extremely pleased with our growing audience share, which in large part is thanks to our close involvement with Northumbria’ [ E1].

The success of Kurja Polt’s research-driven content, had a ‘ huge impact’ on its ability to attract state funding, ‘ the esteem with which we are now held by our state financier …in large part because of the unique academic underpinning we are able [to] offer’ [ E1]. Kurja Polt confirm that ‘ we were awarded a 38% increase in funding from the annual Film Festival Tender in 2017, [a further increase of] 38% in funding from the tender in 2018, and [a] 163% [increase] in 2019. In actual funding amounts we have gone from EUR6,500 to EUR31,000 [2016-2019]’ [ E1]. As with the attendance figures, Peče reiterated that although these numbers may seem modest, ‘ the change for us has been massive as it has enabled us to take important steps towards expanding the festival scope’ [ E1]. One result was that since 2018, the organisation has been able to pay festival staffers rather than employing them purely on a volunteer basis, ‘ in this industry that is almost unheard of and importantly allows us to retain volunteers …and help them to develop more specialist skills within the organisation … [these are] crucial changes for us as a festival organiser’ [ E1].

1.2 Offscreen - Belgium

The research-informed content created for Kurja Polt led to similar positive developments with Offscreen – established in 2008. This annual festival, based in Brussels, gives particular attention to undistributed and rarely screened films, attracting approximately 7,000 visitors each year. Dirk Van Extergem (Director of Offscreen), described how Northumbria’s research was ‘ invaluable …[providing] critical insights into the history and complexity of genre-film, including the changing nature of audience engagement with this type of media content’ [ E3]. Offscreen confirmed how ‘ those insights have enabled us to both position the festival in a way that has helped to meet key aims of Offscreen, support our funding applications, and attract guests in an entirely different manner than we previously could’ [ E3]. As with Kurja Polt, the research led to the development of new festival-tailored educational activities at Offscreen that were ‘more comprehensive than [they] have ever been able to provide before’ [ E3]. Offscreen noted how ‘ at a time of austerity and arts cuts in Belgium, [the research-led change] has meant that we have been able to sustain our budget levels beyond what they would normally be and funders have made clear that the educational offering is a key part of this’ [ E3].

Wider programming has ‘ frequently been influenced’ by the research, as for example the thematic strand developed for the 2018 festival, based on Hunter’s exploration of the Italian zombie genre [ E3]. Offscreen confirmed that ‘ we can go broader and do more profoundly thematic programming … [to] give more and more context to the festival’ [ E3]. The ‘ research-led framework’, in turn, enabled Offscreen to project a more serious tone, helping it to attract guest speakers from the genre-film industry (directors, screen writers etc). The new integrated academic components provided a signal that Offscreen ‘is a place that values their [industry speakers’] contribution to cinema …a means of letting them see they are being taken seriously ... as valued filmmakers [ E3].

1.3 Abertoir - Wales

Gaz Bailey (Director of Abertoir International Horror Festival), noted how the team from Northumbria, in particular Hunter’s ‘ expertise in horror cinema’, provided ‘ valuable research-led (but accessible) content for use at our festival’ [ E4]. In common with Kurja Polt and Offscreen festivals, these contributions were singled out ‘ as being responsible for directly helping us to achieve the goals of our funders in providing significant informative material to the audiences [and have] …been instrumental in keeping the festival going strong into currently its 15th year’ [ E4]. They confirmed that ‘ crucially, our principal funders Ffilm Cymru and Film Hub Wales, have stressed through their support that the educational provision we developed with Dr Hunter…has been crucial to how they view and seek to fund our festival’ [ E4].

Supporting a broader aim shared by other festivals in the field, Abertoir promotes recognition of genre-film and those who work in it, to ‘ make them feel valued’ [ E4]. Abertoir pointed to how Hunter’s research helped them work towards this goal:

our special guests each year are figures who are beloved by the fan community we serve, but who [often] *have had little critical success … people like composer Fabio Frizzi and director Sergio Martino, who have felt much more validated professionally as a result of being made aware of Dr Hunter’s research (touching as it does upon films in which they were professionally involved)*’ [ E4].

2) Advancing popular engagement with, and recognition of, genre-film in Slovenia

The municipal funder Kinodvor confirmed that genre-film was often a marginalised subject for festival circuits, but from 2017 the research from Northumbria has resulted in an ‘ absolutely unique and pioneering’ cultural attraction, and ‘ one of the fastest growing, as well as one of the most significant international film festivals in the country’ [ E5]. Kinodvor explained that the new educational elements allowed it ‘ to more clearly justify our support for a genre cinema festival’, citing the use of Hunter’s research by Kurja Polt and the demonstrable value of the new programming additions developed by the Northumbria team [ E5].

Kinodvor explained the contribution that Kurja Polt has made to the Slovenian cultural sector, how the festival is now considered ‘ the most important “Cinephile Heaven” in Slovenia - something that has been augmented and deepened by …the work of Dr Hunter and his colleagues’ [ E5]. This new status is reflected in the media coverage of the festival each year, including interviews with the research team by the state news broadcaster [ E6]. Furthermore, Kindovor described how the collaboration with Northumbria has seen Kurja Polt become ‘ the only festival in Slovenia that still continuously, consciously, and prominently asks itself what a film festival can, or should, still be today. I only hope that every festival in Slovenia would come, see, enjoy, and - above all - learn from Kurja Polt [ E5].

5. Sources to corroborate the impact

Ref. Source of corroboration Link to claimed impact
E1 Testimonial, Masa Pece (Kurja Polt Genre Film Festival Director) Confirms the programming restructure at Kurja Polt, with resulting benefits to profile and financial sustainability
E2 Testimonial, Monica Stambrini (Genre-Film Director) Confirms that the research informed the validation of work of creative artists
E3 Testimonial, Dirk Van Extergem (Director of Offscreen Film Festival) Confirms the programming restructure at Offscreen, with resulting benefits to profile, financial sustainability, and validating work of creative artists
E4 Testimonial, Gaz Bailey (Abertoir Horror Festival) Confirms the programming restructure at Abertoir, with resulting benefits to profile, financial sustainability, and validating work of creative artists
E5 Testimonial, Koen Van Daele (Assistant Director and Head of Programmes, Kinodvor) Confirms the raised profile of, and increased funding to, Kurja Polt, and improved engagement with film culture in Slovenia
E6 Collated national radio and TV coverage (Slovenia) Research helped to increase public discussion of genre-film in Slovenia
Submitting institution
University of Northumbria at Newcastle
Unit of assessment
32 - Art and Design: History, Practice and Theory
Summary impact type
Societal
Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
No

1. Summary of the impact

There is a persistent and chronic absence of authentic representation of intellectual disability (ID) in TV and film. Portrayals that do appear are often regressive, reinforcing negative or inaccurate stereotypes. Practice-led research undertaken at Northumbria University by academic and film director Len Collin, led to the production of Sanctuary (2016), a critically acclaimed feature film employing a cast of actors with ID that has been shown on every continent and received 4 international awards. Through the making of Sanctuary, Collin’s research has 1) played a significant role in raising awareness of the marginalised status of actors with ID across the film industry. This improved profile has 2) helped to increase the use of authentic casting in recent productions and empowered actors with ID in their career pursuits. Similar developments were replicated in a major UK care service, 3) who changed their practices in response to Sanctuary, creating new opportunities for individuals who use their service to enjoy a greater degree of autonomy and ability to shape the structure of their care provision. Finally, 4) Collin’s work played an instrumental role in repealing Irish legislation that had restricted the rights of people with ID to intimacy, a vital contribution recognised by advocacy groups and Ireland’s Minister for Disabilities.

2. Underpinning research

Recent scholarly assessments of the importance of authentic casting in theatre and performance, as well as contemporary media industry debate about authentic casting in film and TV, have largely centred on non-white and non-trans actors in BAME and trans roles. Until recently, there was little focus on the authentic casting of disabled actors. The practice-based research activity of Collin, in making the feature film Sanctuary [ R1a] addresses this gap. It pushes back at established industry norms, which customarily take the contentious route of telling stories about disability by casting actors without disabilities to play those roles. The best-known international examples include Dustin Hoffman in Rain Man (1988) and Tom Hanks in Forrest Gump (1994). Portrayal of characters with ID (also known as LD or learning disability) by actors with ID has not improved over time, and the Ruderman White Paper identified that film industry casting actors authentically was rare, at just 5% in 2016.

Following Robert McRuer’s work on ‘crip theory’, Collin has identified such practices as ‘cripping up’ (after Kaite O’Reilly) [ R1b] by non-disabled actors. He has drawn upon insights from queer theory and disability studies to help create critically disabled spaces [ R1c]. In particular, Collin’s film Sanctuary addressed issues raised by those studies of the failure of progress in authentic casting and concluded that this has led to disability tropes and stereotypes being repeated in the industry, perpetuating poor on-screen representations of people with disabilities. In his subsequent film, Altered Thinking (2020) [ R1c], Collin places the making of Sanctuary in critical relation to the legacy of ‘cripping up’ in film history.

Sanctuary [ R1a] was directed and script-edited by Collin, based on the play by Christian O’Reilly. The film follows Larry, a man with Down’s Syndrome, and Sophie, who has epilepsy, navigating the Irish law (Section 5 of the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences) Act of 1993) that makes it illegal for them to have sex unless they are married. The film is set on a day out from the training centre they and the group attend, providing them with the opportunity to explore freedoms so often denied them, at the expense of well-meaning carer Tom. The film features a principal cast with Intellectual Disabilities (ID) – a term covering a range of conditions, including Autism and Down’s Syndrome.

The research explored ethical changes to film production norms required when working directly with ID actors. Focusing on two specific areas of questioning, Collin asked (i) in what ways might authentic casting encourage paradigmatic change in the representation of people with ID in cinema, while (ii) interrogating what changes to the mechanics of production and improvisatory working methods might need to be considered to bring this about. In his 2020 book chapter Shooting Actors Who Have Intellectual Disabilities [ R1b] Collin outlines the innovative practice-based methodologies of narrative feature-film production that were trialled to explore how the actors could develop greater agency in the filmmaking process, resulting in more accurate on-screen representations of ID.

The body of research constituting Sanctuary [ R1] started in 2014, when Collin began to conduct workshops for camera with the Blue Teapot Theatre Company, Galway – a company of actors with intellectual disabilities who had already performed Sanctuary as a play. Collin filmed, edited, and screened the actors’ work in the workshops. This enabled the actors to understand continuity editing, camera set-ups, and shot sizes. They could see themselves on screen and adapt their performances accordingly. Collin took the workshops into locations such as a park, cinema, and hotel room to familiarise the actors with the processes of filming [ R1b]. Through the visual, spoken, and editorial language of documentary filmmaking, Altered Thinking [ R1c] reveals the nuanced methodologies evolved by Collin. These enabled him to help move the ID cast from the paradigm of theatre to that of film, paying particular attention to the cast’s welfare, as well as to the specific physical and psychological pressures that the filmmaking process placed on them.

Sanctuary was released in 2017 and awarded Best Film at Moscow’s Breaking Barriers Film Festival (2018), Best Irish Film by the Dublin Film Critics Circle (2017), and Best Director at the Newport Beach Film Festival (2017). The cast won the Michael Dwyer Discovery Award at the Audi Dublin International Film Festival (2017). Sanctuary opened the ReelAbilities New York Film Festival and was further screened at: Camerimage, Poland; Geena Davis’ Bentonville Film Festival; and the Irish Film Festival in Melbourne, Australia. Collin has been invited to speak about Sanctuary on international panels including What’s The Diff? Deakin University Melbourne (2020) and the Sao Paulo XV Symposium of Irish Studies in South America (2020), as well as chairing a panel at Breaking Down Barriers International Film Festival, Moscow (2020).

3. References to the research

R1. Len Collin ( 2017-2020) Sanctuary A Collection of Creative and Critical Work Submitted to REF2021 comprising:

R1a. Sanctuary (2016) Feature Film Director: Len Collin; Writer: Christian O'Reilly; Editor: Julian Ulrichs. Starring: Kieran Coppinger, Charlene Kelly, Robert Doherty. Irish/UK general cinema release Dec 2017 (1hr 27mins). Worldwide release through TV and streaming outlets: Hulu, Sony UK, iTunes, AMC/Sundance, BskyB and Amazon URL: https://vimeo.com/181475341

R1b. Len Collin ( 2020) ‘Shooting Actors who Have Intellectual Disabilities: A Reflexive Analysis on the Making of the Feature Film Sanctuary’, in Katarzyna Ojrzyńska & Maciej Wieczorek Koninklijke eds. Strategies of Disability Representation and Inclusion in Contemporary Culture (Netherlands, Koninklijke Brill NV, 2020)

R1c. Altered Thinking ( 2020) Director, Screen Writer, Editor: Len Collin. A film about the making of Sanctuary, including the contexts the film addresses, aspects of the process and the changes it has led to. 1hr 40mins URL: https://vimeo.com/user2823780/review/479650283/77e7d0d3ad

Research funding

G1. Irish Film Board, 2015-16, EUR225,000*

G2. BAI, 2015-16, EUR300,000*

G3. Zanzibar Films, 2015-16, EUR9,560*

G4. Section 481 Tax Relief Scheme, 2015-16, EUR189,440*

*Grants awarded to Len Collin, in collaboration with Zanzibar Films.

4. Details of the impact

Original practice-led research, which facilitated authentic casting of actors with intellectual disabilities (ID), allowed Collin to successfully translate Sanctuary from stage to screen. The film was a commercial and critical success, reaching millions of viewers with its compelling story, told through a cast of predominantly ID actors. By helping to promote and improve awareness of ID, Collin’s work has become an effective advocacy tool, leading to changes in the film industry, as well as care services in Ireland and the UK. The film proved to be instrumental in supporting lobbying efforts to repeal Irish legislation that had prevented individuals with an ID from pursuing intimate relationships.

4.1 Improving awareness and promoting representation of ID

Sanctuary has toured every continent, receiving multiple awards and screenings at film festivals, as well as within educational and welfare settings. In July 2017 and December 2017, Sanctuary was released in cinemas across Ireland and the UK. The film was also made available to Access Cinema – an EU-funded company that takes cinema to remote and unusual locations. It won the Access Cinemas award for the film that made the most impact on their circuit for 2017 [ E1]. Online, the film has been available on Sky, YouTube, iTunes, Hulu in the USA, and Volta in Ireland [ E2]. Reviews on Amazon Prime Video for example, noted the power of the film’s combination of comedy and pathos, the performances and the message of the film that encourages society to see people with ID as fully rounded human beings [ E3, p1]. The Guardian described the film as ‘valuable’ [ E3, p2] with a BFI review commenting on its ‘radical’ and ‘ powerful message [about casting] … Sanctuary conforms to no stereotype; it is about people wanting to lead ordinary lives on their own terms’ [ E3, p3] .

The success of Sanctuary helped to challenge conventional wisdom about the depiction of intellectual disability in film. The London Evening Standard – which gave the film five stars and rated it one of its films of the year – noted how the film ‘is full of bodies rarely seen on the big screen’ [ E3, p4], while the Irish Times stated ‘it remains unusual to see the ID on film, so a film starring nine such actors is exceptional even before the opening credits roll’ [ E3, p5]. Film Ireland saw Collin’s work as ‘one of the most ambitious, innovative and deeply moving Irish films of recent times… [an achievement] all the more impressive when one considers how rarely ID actors have featured prominently in fiction film’ [ E3, p6].

The discussions stimulated by Sanctuary in the UK entertainment industry led to new activity to support the film and casting of ID actors more broadly. Filmmaker-producer David Wilkinson, founder of distribution company Guerrilla Films confirmed that following his formal attendance at the film’s premiere (Galway Film Festival, 2016), he was convinced to lead a UK-wide distribution [ E4]. This decision was a result of a change in attitudes brought about by the film, ‘I was expecting to be preached to … [but realised] "Oh hang on a minute, this is interesting!" And then I began to laugh. And that may seem odd, but when you're a film professional, I've found that you look at a film in a different way, and so laughing is something that doesn't come easy, particularly to distributors’ [ E4]. Wilkinson wrote a review praising Sanctuary’s use of authentic casting, which had also challenged his prejudices and those of the broader film industry [ E4].

Other filmmakers have approached Collin to discuss authentic casting and working with ID actors, empowering them to cast actors with ID when they might otherwise have employed non-ID actors. The writer and director of the BBC film Ups and Downs (2017) [ E5, p1], discussed casting the lead character of his film who has Down’s Syndrome [ E5, p2]. More recently, another screenwriter-filmmaker worked with Collin on a new proposal for Screen Ireland, for a film about a woman with ID befriending a young girl and the misunderstandings that arise as a result. Collin advised the producer on the value of casting a lead with ID and was subsequently credited with strengthening the application that was successful [ E6].

4.2 Empowering actors with an ID and supporting the promotion of authentic casting

The success of Sanctuary also resulted in significant benefits for the actors and the theatrical company they work with. Petal Pilley – CEO, Blue Teapot – noted the effect was ‘absolutely massive, [they] are completely empowered …that people interact [and say] "I've seen you", you know just to be met on the street [and be told] "I saw, you were wonderful" …not many of us get that kind of interaction walking up our local high street, but they do’ [ E7].

The film’s success has seen the cast successfully audition for new roles, ‘they are getting approached so that confidence is definitely shifted’ [ E7]. Newfound confidence resulted in one of the lead actors requesting and moving into her own apartment, ‘they're not afraid to say what they think and feel, and I think you know that's really priceless’ [ E7]. Following the release of Sanctuary, ‘the arts council sat up finally… [the film] completely elevated the status of [Blue Teapot] internationally [and] …our capacity to carry a really important message, which is that the great artists, the great actors, they do great work’ [ E7]. This has helped inspire younger/newer artists who want to develop as actors: ‘"there's me Oh! I might be able to do that" …that encouragement is huge’ [ E7]. Direct responses from actors were due to be collected in Summer 2020, through filmed in-person interviews but this was delayed because of the coronavirus pandemic and travel restrictions. Interviews were not conducted remotely for ethical and safeguarding reasons.

4.3 Supporting changes to health and care practices

Collin’s work has initiated broader discussions about the need for changes in the Irish and UK care sectors to promote greater independence. Vivo Care Choices (Vivo) – the principal care provider for Cheshire West and Chester Council – is a case in point. MD Alistair Jeffs outlined how – typically for the care sector – Vivo has struggled to support service users wanting a more flexible approach to social relationships outside of the formal care environment, something Jeffs noted was often discouraged by family, friends, and care providers ‘because it didn't quite fit in with their view of perhaps what was right or appropriate for the individuals or didn't fit into what they could afford to deliver’ [ E8].

Vivo connected with Collin following the success of Sanctuary. As well as showing the film as part of the Chester Kaleidoscope festival – aiming to raise the profile of people with ID – Collin used the film to facilitate workshops with Vivo staff and service users [ E8]. Jeffs confirms how these events were ‘truly inspirational’ [ E8]. As a result of engaging with Collin’s work, Vivo has started to evolve the services it offers. This includes an initiative called ‘Time Shared’, a buddy system for individuals with common interests allowing them to socialise outside of the formal care environment [ E8]. The scheme has given service users ‘greater independence, freedom, happiness, and …it starts to portray a much more positive view of individuals and what they can achieve’ [ E8]. Working with Collin has encouraged ‘professionals working with them, and family members to …have greater aspirations and a stronger voice to say, actually, we would like a different range of support or we'd like a different range of opportunities’ [ E8].

4.4 Contributing to repeal of the Sexual Offences Act 1993 (Republic of Ireland)

Canadian public broadcaster CBC/Radio-Canada noted how ‘movies can have big impacts on people's lives, but not many films can say they've actually changed the law. Enter Sanctuary …’ [ E3, p7]. Irish advocacy groups had been lobbying for a change to the Sexual Offences Act 1993 since its inception. The film adaptation of Sanctuary played a central role in bringing this issue to the attention of both the public and national legislators. At the 2017 screening at Dublin film festival, it was announced by Sarah Lennon, Inclusion Ireland CEO, that thanks to the popular and critical success of the film, Section 5 of the Criminal Law Act 1993 had been repealed in the Oireachtas (Irish Parliament). She explained why the film was of such crucial importance, ‘ the real difficulty we faced was getting people to connect and really understand what impact the law was having …Sanctuary really did open up that storytelling door to us and to other campaigners at that time’ [ E9, p1].

In galvanising the campaign for reform, Sanctuary helped to convince legislators to pass a new Bill in 2017, which no longer made it a criminal offence for consensual sexual relationships to take place between individuals who have an ID. This change benefited thousands of Irish citizens who would otherwise have been affected by the discriminatory law. Ireland’s Minister for Disabilities, Finian McGrath who oversaw the passage of legislation through the parliament, confirmed that Sanctuary has ‘led to a quiet revolution in relation to the sexuality of people with physical and intellectual disabilities’ [ E10, p1]. Inclusion Ireland confirm that there are now positive examples of the law bringing benefits to families across the country, ‘ there was a lack of confidence or comfort with the idea of [family members with an ID] having intimate relationships or sexual relationships …this film has helped break down a lot of those barriers’ [ E9, p2].

5. Sources to corroborate the impact

### Ref. ### Source of corroboration ### Link to claimed impact
E1 Webpage, Award Confirmation (Access Cinema) Confirms distribution by and award from Access Cinema
E2 Sanctuary, Intl. Sales/Release figures Confirms change in industry awareness, promoted ID actors
E3 Collated Media Coverage, 2016-19 Captured the effect of the film on audiences and reviewers and confirms change in public awareness, supported repeal of Irish legislation
E4 Interview, David Wilkinson (Founder, Guerrilla Films) Confirms change in industry awareness, promoted ID actors
E5 Webpage and Correspondence from Director, ‘Ups and Downs’ (BBC Website) Confirms influence on authentic casting
E6 Email from Sarah Aherne Confirms influence on authentic casting
E7 Interview, Petal Pilley (CEO, Blue Teapot Theatre Co) Confirms change in industry awareness, promoted ID actors
E8 Interview, Alistair Jeffs (Managing Director, Vivo Care Choices) Confirms change in awareness in care sector which informed new practices
E9 Interview, Sarah Lennon (Director, Inclusion Ireland) Confirms change in public awareness, supported repeal of Irish legislation
E10 Interview, Finian McGrath (Minister for Disabilities ROI) Confirms change in public awareness, supported repeal of Irish legislation
Submitting institution
University of Northumbria at Newcastle
Unit of assessment
32 - Art and Design: History, Practice and Theory
Summary impact type
Societal
Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
No

1. Summary of the impact

Western-centric and economically driven design methods are not equipped to support and evaluate impact arising from social innovation initiatives within non-Western cultures. They can inadvertently obscure, disrupt, or replace culturally specific practices and relationships during the design process. Research by Professor Joyce Yee of Northumbria University on culturally-specific design approaches helped establish the Design and Social Innovation in Asia-Pacific (DESIAP) network which has supported nearly 600 social innovation practitioners from 100 organisations in 14 countries. Yee’s research has enabled Asia-Pacific organisations such as Re:public (Japan) who were already using design methods to establish a stronger professional identity as design and social innovation (DSI) practitioners. Her work on evaluation approaches (for example with Impact Hub Phnom Penh) has helped transform the way organisations use evaluation and has resulted in improved social outcomes for the marginalised and excluded communities they serve.

2. Underpinning research

Design and Social Innovation (DSI) uses design methods to co-create new ideas, services, and programmes to address social problems with the people who will use them. Traditionally, design methods have centred on unlocking economic potential, typically in Western-based commercial organisations and contexts (Europe and the United States). In contrast, DSI initiatives that aim to create social impact are often delivered in communities by third and public sector organisations. Evaluating social impact is challenging as it is not measured through profit and market successes, but through changes in behaviour, systems, and policies that ultimately benefit an individual or a community.

Research led by Professor Joyce Yee from Northumbria University explored the value of design in supporting social innovation and investigated the most effective ways for DSI initiatives to create social impact. A key example was the AHRC-funded project [ G1] that examined the impact of design in public, voluntary, and community sector organisations across England, Scotland, and Australia. Rather than focusing only on how design adds value, Yee uniquely looked at the conditions required to maximise this value and her research revealed that creating a community and building trusting relationships between all stakeholders is the most important condition for successful co-creation in this context [ R1].

Yee’s experience of living and working in the South-east Asian region led her to be concerned that the dominance of Western-centric DSI methods can inadvertently obscure, disrupt, or replace culturally-specific practices and relationships during the design process, and impede the potential of successful DSI. Therefore in 2015, in collaboration with Dr Yoko Akama (RMIT University, Australia), Yee hosted a symposium and workshop on Design and Social Innovation in Asia-Pacific (DESIAP) in Singapore. Akama’s expertise in participatory design and experiences with indigenous populations in Australia complemented Yee’s specialist understanding of innovation and social impact in design, particularly in community-driven organisations [ R1]. The success of this event led to an AHRC network grant [ G2] that resulted in the foundation of the DESIAP Network – a virtual platform and community of practice to address the needs of oft-overlooked organisations engaged in DSI within the region. DESIAP events designed to improve understanding of DSI in Asia-Pacific countries included 3 international symposiums, 8 workshops, and 4 projects attracting nearly 600 participants in total.

Yee conducted research using insights from participants at DESIAP workshops in Singapore (2015, 2019), Bangkok (2016), Newcastle (2016), Yangon (2017), Phnom Penh (2017), Melbourne (2017), and Kuala Lumpur (2017). Findings revealed that respecting and understanding cultural sensitivities is key to fostering the trust and interdependent relationships with stakeholders that enable DSI practices to work successfully [ R2]. Yee’s research also highlighted that design practices need to be sensitive to a blend of cultures, relationships, materials, histories, philosophies, and world views to encourage inclusive practice and avoid domination by Western ideals [ R3]. Building on this, Yee and post-doctoral researcher, Cyril Tjahja (Hanzehogeschool Groningen, The Netherlands) highlighted the positive influence of social hierarchy in participatory DSI in Thailand [ R4]. This conclusion challenges the potential negative perceptions of hierarchy in DSI derived from Western pre-judgements. It illustrated the importance of more culturally-specific and culturally-grounded ways of working in DSI and provided an example of how it works in practice.

Yee’s research also highlighted how using a Western perspective to evaluate DSI in non-Western contexts is inappropriate and proposed new culturally-sensitive and transformative-learning methods for evaluation [ R5, R6]. Yee and colleagues suggested that traditional quantitative evaluation fails to account for the long-term impact related to social value and its potential to transform individuals [ R5]. A key example of this was the ‘DSI Social Impact Framework’, established in 2017 with input from 12 DSI practitioners from Malaysia, Thailand, Myanmar, Cambodia, Indonesia, and The Philippines. The new framework assessed changes in participant mindset and recommended the use of evaluation tools to share stories and learning, crowdsource opinions, explore unknowns, and develop shared understandings of impact. The framework encouraged DSI projects to embed community-led evaluation from the start to help shape the project as it progresses and so maximise social impact [ R6].

3. References to the research

R1. Joyce Yee and White, H. ( 2016) ‘The Goldilocks Conundrum: The “Just Right” Conditions for Design to Achieve Impact in Public and Third Sector Projects’ International Journal of Design 10 (1): 1991-3761 http://www.ijdesign.org/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/2381/730

R2. Akama, Y. and Joyce Yee ( 2016) ‘Seeking Stronger Plurality: Intimacy and Integrity in Designing for Social Innovation’ Proceedings from Cumulus Hong Kong 2016 33/16: 173-179 https://www.cumulusassociation.org/cumulus-working-papers-3316-cumulus-hong-kong-2016-open-design-for-e-very-thing/

R3. Akama, Y. and Joyce Yee ( 2019). ‘Special Issue: Embracing Plurality in Designing Social Innovation Practices’ Design and Culture 11 (1): 1-11 https://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2019.1571303

R4. Tjahja, C. and Joyce Yee ( 2018) ‘Social Hierarchy in Design and Social Innovation: Perspectives from Thailand’ In C. Storni, K. Leahy, M. McMahon, P. Lloyd, & E. Bohemia (Eds.) Proceedings of DRS2018: Catalyst 2: 704-716 https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2018.420

R5. Joyce Yee, Raijmakers, B., and Ichikawa, F. ( 2019) ‘Transformative Learning as Impact in Social Innovation’ Design and Culture 11 (1): 109-132 https://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2019.1567984

R6. Joyce Yee, Akama, Y., and Teerapong, K. ( 2020). ‘Being Community and Culturally-led: Tensions and Pluralities in Evaluating Social Innovation’. In Y. Akama, L. Fennessy, S. Harrington and A. Farrago (Eds.), ServDes.2020: Tensions, Paradoxes, Plurality (pp. 458 - 471). Melbourne, Australia: Linköping University Electronic Press. https://www.servdes2020.org/events/32-being-community-and-culturally-led-tensions-and-pluralities-in-evaluating-social-innovation

Research funding:

G1. PI, Arts and Humanities Research Council, 2014-2015, GBP37,423 (AH/L013444/1)

G2. PI, Arts and Humanities Research Council, 2016-2017, GBP37,717 (AH/N004736/1)

4. Details of the impact

(**indicative maximum 750 words)

Yee worked with over 100 organisations from 14 countries around the Asia-Pacific region who support communities to deliver social innovation initiatives which led to 1) the establishment of a professional identity for DSI practitioners and 2) the transformation of professional evaluative practices for social impact.

4.1 Establishment of a professional identity

The organisations Yee worked with through the DESIAP Network address diverse social issues, but all adopt methods from the field of design in their work, although they have not always recognised these methods as DSI. Yee worked with 145 participants from these organisations through 8 DESIAP workshops to re-frame and embed their work within design frameworks and concepts, providing an international platform to showcase their work and extend their reach. Furthermore, they cascaded their new understanding of design to their organisations and local communities, carving out a professional space to ensure their work (and their use of design) was recognised and valued by funding agencies.

Engagement with DESIAP resulted in a stronger professional identity for DSI practitioners. For example, Re:public (Tokyo, Japan) trains citizens to develop sustainable responses to social needs in their communities via city-wide programmes. Fumiko Ichikawa, co-founder and MD of Re:public, noted that working with DESIAP has ‘proved invaluable for us’ and resulted in them recognising and validating what they do as DSI: ‘ We have been able to develop our own disciplinary specific language to make what we do accessible and recognisable as design and innovation in Japan…enabling us to gain a level of understanding about our work that we otherwise would not have been able to achieve’ [ E1].

Demonstrating value is particularly important for emerging markets, such as in Myanmar. As Klaus Oberbauer, from Impact Hub Yangon explained, working with Yee ‘ strengthened our perspective in how we use design in our programmes; gained knowledge in how other organisations use design and helped inform what we do next. [It has] given us a platform to share our work with other practitioners and with an international public […] These changes have ultimately aided us to improve the support that we are able to offer the young entrepreneurs that we encounter’ [ E2].

Between January 2019 and November 2020, 3631 users visited the DESIAP’s website ( www.desiap.org) from 108 countries, with 56% (14/25) of the top 25 countries based in the Asia-Pacific region. Visitors from other parts of the world, including, USA, UK, Germany, and Canada also appear in the top 10 [ E3]. DSI practitioners value the website which offers inspiration, examples of good design practice, and provides connection to practitioners working in other countries; the resources page is the second most viewed (1116 page views) after the home page [ E3]. These resources have been used to support and argue for more culturally-specific and culturally-grounded ways of working in DSI. Penny Hagen, a co-design lead in a public sector innovation team based in South Auckland, New Zealand noted: ‘ I frequently refer to DESIAP in professional settings as a reference point for an alternative, local design practice and dialogue to counter and complement more dominant Western models’ [ E4].

4.2 Transformed practitioner and funder evaluative practices and improved delivery

Traditionally, evaluation frameworks used to capture the social impact of design initiatives are limited, funder-focused, and measured only against criteria defined at the outset, e.g., the number of new enterprises, or number of people trained. Yee’s work resulted in DSI practitioners and funders changing how they think about the social impact of their work within communities and informed the evaluation of specific programmes. Participation in a 2017 DESIAP event led one practitioner to identify ‘ different levels of evaluative practice (personal reflection, internal to the team, and with external partners) and new methods of capturing audio/visual inputs’ [ E5].

DESIAP’s new ‘DSI Social Impact Framework’ [ E6] provided professionals with an alternate evaluation framework that is suited to the relationship-, community-, and culture-driven aspects of social innovation. The DESIAP Impact and Evaluation report published by Yee and collaborators [ E6] has been used to argue for changes in practices. A funder based in South and Southeast Asia, Nicky Wilkinson at Firetree Philanthropy, recognised that the framework ‘helps to surface and “crystallise” … a process that many of our partners are “inherently doing”/a way of working that is fundamental to how they approach designing and evaluating any intervention’ [ E7]. The report [ E6] was cited in Firetree’s blog describing their funding approach, where their Director of Philanthropy, Nicky Wilkinson, acknowledged that ‘we [funders] need to find alternative, more flexible ways of “reporting”’ [ E8, p11].

Yee also worked with Impact Hub Phnom Penh on the evaluation of their CLEAR programme. The Hub provides entrepreneurship training to youths and CLEAR is an online course which trains and mentors young Cambodian leaders to help them develop culturally-specific leadership skills. The programme trained 1,500 people (March 2019 - October 2020) and was the Hub’s first to have a comprehensive monitoring and evaluation plan to inform future improvements; now an embedded approach to future programmes. The Hub’s co-founder, Laura Smithman, explained that as a result, the programme content integrated ‘ intentional steps of empathy building [and…] develop[ed] overarching mindsets in creative confidence and comfort with ambiguity’. Further, she states ‘ we now embed evaluation in the development of our current programmes… by planning the evaluation at the start… [and we…] monitor participant responses’. This design-led evaluation plan proved effective when the Hub needed to move one of their programmes quickly to virtual delivery, in response to Covid-19, and they used participant feedback to ‘ enable rapid participant-informed adaptation to this new format’ [ E9].

The impact of Yee’s research also reached beyond the Asia-Pacific region, in contexts where DSI is being utilised to address localised issues. The DESIAP Impact and Evaluation report [ E6] led the Tower Hamlets Communities Driving Change (CDC) programme team at The Young Foundation (based in the UK) to change how impact is measured in their work. Through training delivered by Yee to 8 team members (July – Dec 2020), they explored alternative forms of evaluation that were then embedded within the programme and wider organisation through new individual and team-based reflective practices. This changed how the team understood and evidenced the social impact of their work [ E10]. [text removed for publication]

5. Sources to corroborate the impact

Ref. Source of corroboration Link to claimed impact
E1 Testimonial - Fumiko Ichikawa, Managing Director and Co-founder of Re:public, Japan Confirms improved recognition and accessibility of design for the company
E2 Testimonial - Klaus Oberbauer, Co-founder of Impact Hub Yangon Confirms improved understanding and use of design within the company
E3 DESIAP website Google Analytics Data Confirms number, locations of website visitors and page views
E4 Testimonial - Penny Hagen, Co-Design Lead from The Southern Initiatives and Co-design Lab, Auckland, New Zealand Confirms DESIAP as a reference for local design practices in the Asia-Pacific
E5 Anonymous post event survey from participant of the DESIAP Kuala Lumpur 2017 Workshop Demonstrates new ways of evaluating social impact
E6 Impact and Evaluation in Designing Social Innovation Report, 2019 Publication of the alternative evaluation framework for DSI Practitioners
E7 Post-workshop survey feedback collected via email from Nicky Wilkinson, Director of Philanthropy, Tondo Foundation (now known as Firetree Philanthropy) Confirms the impact the new framework has on DSI organisations
E8 Firetree Trust, Our Partnership funding approach” (Blog post, Nicky Wilkinson, August 2019) Confirms the uptake of the new framework to support the organisations funding approach
E9 Testimonial - Laura Smithman, Co-founder and COO Impact Hub Phnom Penh. Confirms how the new evaluation framework has informed programme development and organisational strategies
E10 Testimonial - Isabel Young, Senior Programme Manager, Communities Driving Change, The Young Foundation, UK Confirms the new evaluation framework has informed organisational approaches and programme development
Submitting institution
University of Northumbria at Newcastle
Unit of assessment
32 - Art and Design: History, Practice and Theory
Summary impact type
Societal
Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
No

1. Summary of the impact

Service Design (SD), where services are designed in collaboration with the people who will use them, can create more effective, efficient, and desirable services. More than a decade of funding decline for UK voluntary organisations means they need to deliver more, with less, to provide services for people experiencing a multitude of challenges. Research led by Dr Laura Warwick with colleagues at Northumbria University explored, for the first time, the use of SD in voluntary organisations. Warwick worked with 2 large national voluntary organisations - Mind (plus its affiliated 105 local Minds) and Girlguiding UK – [text removed for publication]. New Philanthropy Capital (NPC), the UK’s leading charity and philanthropy consultants, also used Warwick and colleagues’ findings to develop sector-specific SD guidance for 144 charities. The use of SD resulted in more user-centred organisational cultures, improved services for users, led to job creation, secured income worth GBP8,200,000 for Mind [text removed for publication].

2. Underpinning research

Service Design (SD) uses creative methods and tools to design new services, or improve existing ones, to provide better service experiences for all users and stakeholders. The methodology engages users as co-designers throughout, particularly those delivering and receiving the service. This ensures that the end service is effective, efficient, and desirable for all parties before implementation, thus improving service outcomes and reducing the waste of resources. Understanding people’s needs at a service level can also enact change in systems, strategies, and policies to create more user-focused organisations. SD has been an established practice for 20 years, but research has predominantly focused on the private and public sectors; the use of SD had not previously been explored in voluntary sector organisations. The body of research conducted by Dr Laura Warwick and colleagues at Northumbria investigates the relevance, use, best practice, and impact of SD in the voluntary sector. It remains the only body of work focused on SD in this context [ R1- R6].

Research conducted between 2011 and 2014, led by Warwick, found that SD is a valuable approach to voluntary organisations delivering services. Longitudinal data gathered from working with 3 voluntary organisations showed it helped charities to: develop more customer-focused services; make financial gains; and make transformational service, system and policy changes [ R1]. This was the first known research to focus on the value of SD to the voluntary sector and led to the creation of the first ever SD programme in a voluntary organisation. In the same study, Warwick ascertained that to increase the impact of SD in such organisations, a designer needs to encourage critical reflection and radical change, while simultaneously gaining trust to support teams through this new design process [ R2, R3]. It is the only study to have described how SD should be implemented and supported by designers in this context.

Warwick also examined the advantages and challenges of embedding SD in voluntary organisations and suggested practical ways to embed SD capabilities [ R4]. This included the development of SD ambassador roles and creating sector-specific SD training. The work drew on experiences of those embedding design in national voluntary organisations, including co-authors Pierri (Mind) and Garber (Innovation Unit), to understand the conditions required to maximise the value and impact of SD. The novelty of the findings, particularly how to create a user-centred SD culture, have directly influenced the development of 3 SD programmes in the voluntary sector.

Warwick led a study exploring the impact of participating in SD projects on the stakeholders involved. Undertaken with Northumbria colleagues, the research gathered the perceived impacts of involvement on the co-designers developing a mental health service. The paper proposed that a designer’s responsibility should increase to explicitly manage a co-designer’s wellbeing during the process, and suggested ways in which this should be done [ R5]. Data from this study was compared and contrasted with data generated in 10 other mental health design projects between 2014 and 2019, across 4 countries, involving hundreds of stakeholders. Warwick, together with her co-investigators, found 5 systemic issues that act as barriers to the use of co-design in mental health settings. Warwick et al. presented a series of design strategies to address these contentious issues in practice [ R6]. It is the first paper to draw on the experiences of stakeholders co-designing mental health services and systems at such a large scale: both in terms of projects and countries involved. The findings of both studies influenced Mind’s approach to co-designing services and their strategies for mitigating risks.

3. References to the research

R1. Laura Warwick, Robert Young, and Matthew Lievesley ( 2014) ‘The potential of a Design for Service approach to transform Voluntary Community Sector organisations’ pp. 47–56 in Proceedings of ServDes. 2014. Fourth Service Design and Innovation Conference (Lancaster, April 2014) http://www.servdes.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Warwick-L-Young-R-Lievesley-M.pdf

R2. Laura Warwick and Robert Young ( 2016) ‘The role of Design as a critical friend to the Voluntary Community Sector’ pp. 339-351 in Proceedings of ServDes. 2016. Fifth Service Design and Innovation Conference (Copenhagen, May 2016) http://www.ep.liu.se/ecp/125/028/ecp16125028.pdf

R3. Laura Warwick ( 2017) 'Designing Trust: the importance of relationships in social contexts' The Design Journal 20 (sup1): S3096-S3105 https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352817

R4. Pierri, P., Laura Warwick, and Garber, J. ( 2016) ‘Embedding design in a mental health network’ pp. 580-585 in Proceedings of ServDes. 2016. Fifth Service Design and Innovation Conference (Copenhagen, May 2016) http://www.ep.liu.se/ecp/125/054/ecp16125054.pdf

R5. Laura Warwick, Tinning, A.*, Neil Smith, and Robert Young ( 2018) ‘Co-designing wellbeing: the commonality of needs between co-designers and mental health service users’ pp. 2544 – 2557 in Proceedings of Design Research Society 2018 Conference (Limerick, June 2018) https://www.scribd.com/document/382347614/DRS2018-Vol-6#fullscreen&from_embed

R6. Sangiorgi, D.**, Farr, M.***, McAllister, S.****, Mulvale, G.*****, Sneyd, M.*, Vink, J.******, and Laura Warwick ( 2019) 'Designing in highly contentious areas: Perspectives on a way forward for mental healthcare transformation' The Design Journal 22 (sup1): 309-330 https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2019.1595422

*PhD Student, **Politecnico di Milano, Italy; ***University of Bristol, UK; ****King’s College London, UK; *****McMaster University, UK; ******Karlstad University, Sweden

4. Details of the impact

Warwick and colleagues’ research led to the use of SD as the core approach to developing services in 2 major voluntary organisations, Mind and Girlguiding (GG), [text removed for publication]. New Philanthropy Capital (NPC) - the UK’s leading charity and philanthropy consultants - also used Warwick et al.’s findings to develop sector-specific SD resources and training for 144 charities. The use of SD has resulted in: 1) more user-centred organisational cultures 2) more effective, efficient, and desirable services for users; and 3) economic gains, in the form of income, efficiency of resources, and jobs created.

4.1 Creation of more user-centred organisational cultures

Mind provides support to those experiencing a mental health problem, supporting 396,000 people (2018/2019) through their network of 105 local Mind organisations in England and Wales. Mind’s involvement in Warwick et al.’s longitudinal research was, as stated by Hazel Flynn, Head of Local Service Strategy and Development at Mind, ‘ instrumental in the formation of a Service Design programme and team in Mind (SDiM)’ in 2014, creating the first in-house SD programme in the voluntary sector [ E1]. Their research was used to design the SDiM strategy: ‘ namely, focusing on [SD] capacity and capability-building within local Minds’, which became a permanent programme [ E1]. Warwick’s research into the soft skills important in the sector also informed SDiM job roles. SD training and resources were distributed to all Mind teams and their 105 local Mind organisations. Where previously there had been no agreed, consistent service development process, SD became the ‘Mind way’ to develop services. Hazel Flynn explains that ‘ the programme and the service design approach is included in all of our delivery plans and strategies for the next five years’ [ E1].

GG is the UK’s largest girls-only youth organisation supporting over 400,000 girls to achieve their potential. In 2018, Warwick coached their Director of Operations on how to create a SD programme to support their Growth and Insights Department, particularly drawing on her research into the challenges of embedding SD. The GG team explained that ‘ for a charity with no experience with Service Design, having access to research that collates a range of charity experiences, saved both time and money and improved our confidence in incorporating the role effectively’ [ E2a]. Warwick sat on the SD steering group as an external expert to provide ‘ strategic direction and vision... and significant wisdom around embedding Service Design culture in the Third Sector’ [ E2a]. As a result, SD and its principles are embedded in GG’s 2020 strategy to enable ‘ a user-centred, insight-driven approach to service development and strategic decision-making across the charity’ [ E2b].

[text removed for publication]

4.2 Internal and external service users’ direct involvement in creating positive change led to better services

Mind embedded SD to co-design the majority of their new services [ E1] and an independent evaluation of SDiM found it empowered Mind’s service users: ‘ Participants talked about feeling more confident, empowered and valued as a result of being involved in projects that they saw as being worthwhile and useful’ [ E4, p9]. One example is ‘Mums Matter’, a perinatal mental health service co-designed in 2016 with mums who had experienced mental health issues during their pregnancy or post-birth. Warwick and colleagues’ research into designing with vulnerable groups was used to create all of the SD project activity that led to ‘Mums Matter’ [ E5, p1]. In 2017, Mind successfully applied for GBP117,940 to pilot the service in rural Wales, which supported 121 mums experiencing mental health issues [ E5, p1]. Independent evaluation into the pilot found that ‘95% (n = 108) of participants reported an improvement in their wellbeing by the end of the programme’ [ E6, p3]. In 2020, Mums Matter was being delivered by 8 local Mind organisations across England and Wales [ E5, p3].

In 2019, Warwick drew on her research to coach GG’s SD team as they undertook extensive research into understanding and redesigning the membership experience for 18-30-year olds. The research ‘ transformed the way that we think about our work with this age group. The findings were incorporated into the volunteer experience and girl experience diagnostics that fed into our new strategy’ [ E2b].

[text removed for publication]

NPC, the UK’s leading charity and philanthropy consultants, provide support and expertise on effective giving. In 2019, they used Warwick and colleagues’ research to create Guidance on co-design and community spaces for recipients of the Co-op Foundation’s Building Connections Fund, aimed at reducing loneliness in young people [ E8a, E8b]. The guidance was shared with 144 recipient organisations to support them to use SD in their projects. NPC’s evaluation of the fund found that using SD had ‘ influenced how staff approached their work, helped generate ideas, and improved decision-making about service delivery’ [ E9, p3]. Impact reached beyond the co-design projects, including ‘ increased confidence and empowerment among co-design participants translating into other areas of their lives, such as improved schoolwork, better behaviour, and life skills such as budgeting, planning and communication’ [ E9, p3].

4.3 Improved efficiency, increased funding and job roles as a result of using SD

SD is ‘ a key part of our future success and sustainability’ [ E1] in Mind and since 2015, SDiM has received an annual budget of GBP150,000 from the organisation [ E1]. The SDiM programme created services desirable for both users and funders, including GBP6,000,000 delivered by Middlesbrough and Stockton Mind, one of Mind’s network of local Mind organisations. Warwick supported the design of the programme to reduce social isolation of older people in the area [ E10, p1], and 34 new, permanent jobs (headcount: 34) created to deliver it [ E10, p3]. Warwick also informed the use of SD as the programme’s core approach to development: ‘ strategic decisions [are] based on a rigorous, user-centred process, that ensure that the programme is as effective as possible’ [ E10, p1] . As the SDiM programme also resulted in GBP2,200,000 worth of other funding for Mind and its network [ E1], in total, the use of SD directly contributed to a total of GBP8,200,000 funding for Mind [ E1, E10].

GG created 2 permanent SD job roles (headcount: 2) to form an in-house SD team [ E2b]. Creating this team has resulted in savings in commissioning costs and time and the GG team stated ‘ Inhouse skills and capacity are far more beneficial for long-term benefit to the charity both financially and for retaining knowledge on the charity’ [ E2b].

[text removed for publication]

5. Sources to corroborate the impact

Ref. Source of corroboration Link to claimed impact
E1 Testimonial - Hazel Flynn, Head of Local Service Strategy and Development, Mind Confirms implementation of SD into Mind’s strategy and programmes and associated economic benefits
E2 Testimonial (a): J Whitehead, Director of Operations; T Fudge, Head of Growth and Insight; R Birch, Service Designer; and (b) J Whitehead, T Fudge and A Hatamian, Insight Manager, Girlguiding UK Confirms how SD has informed strategy at GG and created SD job roles
E3 [text removed for publication] [text removed for publication]
E4 Report - Independent evaluation into Service Design in Mind programme Confirms improvements for participants in SD-developed Mind programmes
E5 Testimonial letter and email - Leslie Proctor, Service Development Manager, Mind Confirms use of SD to develop “Mums Matter” and the roll-out of the programme
E6 Report - Independent evaluation conducted into Mums Matter pilot Confirms success of “Mums Matter” for participants of the programme
E7 [text removed for publication] [text removed for publication]
E8 Email (a) - Michelle Man, Senior Consultant, New Philanthropy Capital; Report (b) - Guidance on Co-design and Community Spaces Confirms the inclusion of SD in NPC’s guidance and the reach of the guidance
E9 Report - Independent evaluation into Co-op Foundation’s Building Connections Fund Confirms increase empowerment of participants that improves lives
E10 Testimonial letter and email - Michelle Dawson, Ageing Better Middlesbrough Manager Confirms successful funding proposal and creation of 34 job roles
Submitting institution
University of Northumbria at Newcastle
Unit of assessment
32 - Art and Design: History, Practice and Theory
Summary impact type
Technological
Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
No

1. Summary of the impact

Diabetic retinopathy, a degenerative eye-condition affecting all type 1 diabetics and 60% of type 2, is the leading cause of blindness among working age adults. To support those affected by this condition, Northumbria University’s development of a Multiple Perspective Problem Framing (MPPF) approach provides a design-led innovation process to help deliver economically sustainable, self-administered healthcare. Application of the MPPF approach was integral to industrial partner PolyPhotonix Ltd.’s production of the Noctura 400 sleep mask, a new treatment for diabetic retinopathy. This non-invasive home-based treatment has produced substantial improvements in patient sight and wellbeing. The Noctura 400’s success has also increased PolyPhotonix’s annual turnover [text removed for publication] and enabled the manufacturer to significantly expand operations, creating [text removed for publication] new jobs, and attracting [text removed for publication] investment [text removed for publication]. Noctura 400 has been patented around the world including Europe, China, USA, Mexico, Australia, Japan, South Korea, and Canada. [text removed for publication].

2. Underpinning research

Northumbria University research led by Dr Stuart English has demonstrated that an organisation’s capacity for innovation is dependent upon the way they perceive problems and opportunities. Organisations are often dominated by pre-conceptions and rely on familiar approaches to innovation, which may be inaccurate or not fit for the emerging challenges they face. This can create a tunnel-vision that excludes alternative potential opportunities or approaches, and thereby limits innovation and growth [ R1- R3].

Through research conducted with SMEs, multinational businesses, and public sector organisations, English and his collaborators developed and studied how integrated mind-mapping techniques facilitate team-based workshop activities and combine multiple perspectives into one canvas for ease of navigation [ R3]. Iteration of these techniques with 80 collaborating organisations resulted in the Multiple Perspective Problem Framing (MPPF) approach to design-led innovation. MPPF involves collecting various datasets which frame issues and opportunities from widely different, singular perspectives in order to evaluate, compare, and determine their commercial potential. MPPF synthesises this onto a single canvas of interrelated factors where the competing benefits and challenges of different perspectives can be seen in an original framing unique to each company. The collaborative process enables a company to visualise and navigate its relationship with technology, intellectual property, and commercialisation, allowing potential strategies to be robustly and holistically evaluated. English’s research also indicates how MPPF facilitates organisations in developing or refining their innovation strategy and product/service delivery to meet industrial and sectoral trends, ensuring the adoption of an economically sustainable route to internal innovation [ R2- R3].

In 2010, English initiated research exploring the potential of creating patient-administered healthcare technology with an industrial partner, PolyPhotonix Ltd - a company based in the North East of England specialising in [text removed for publication] organic light emitting devices (OLEDs). Recognising that innovation in healthcare, and ultimately the patient experience, is traditionally hindered by looking at issues from a single perspective (such as technological novelty or the existing evidence base), English applied MPPF with PolyPhotonix to gain new insights on ways to successfully harness the opportunities of OLEDs in health technology [ R4]. The MPPF approach drew together six distinct, context-specific fields of enquiry: 1) current scientific research, 2) technology innovation, 3) human factors, 4) sleep patterns and habits, 5) product stakeholder networks, and 6) change factors [ R4]. Through the use of MPPF, the research identified an unmet need for non-invasive and lower-cost treatments for diabetic retinopathy (DR) for which OLED technology could be utilised [ R4]. This research informed the claims of a patent granted in specific international jurisdictions from 2015 to 2020 for an OLED sleep mask [ R5], known commercially as Noctura 400. Subsequently, Northumbria applied the MPPF process through an incremental and cyclic process of design and materials specification, prototyping and usability testing, to refine the wearability of the Noctura 400 OLED mask. This research facilitated the development of both the light-treatment cartridge and improved the comfort and fit of the mask to produce a more effective, lighter, and more breathable design [ R6].

3. References to the research

R1. Stuart English ( 2007) ‘Creating Universal Form – Using Universals to Describe Design Solution Space’ Design Principles and Practices: An International Journal 1(4): 21-30 https://doi.org/10.18848/1833-1874/CGP/v01i04/37864

R2. Stuart English ( 2008) ‘Integrated Mind Mapping: Multiple Perspective Problem Framing’ pp. 35-42 in Networks of design: Proceedings of the 2008 Annual International Conference of the Design History Society (Falmouth, January 2008). E-book, Universal Publishers. Available on request

R3. Stuart English, Moor, T., and Jackson, W. ( 2010) Value innovation modelling: Design thinking as a tool for business analysis and strategy. Design Research Society International Conference, Montreal, Canada, 7-9 July 2010, paper 37 http://www.drs2010.umontreal.ca/data/PDF/037.pdf

R4. Stuart English and Rafiq Elmansy ( 2020) ‘Investigating Patient Adherence in the Medical Technology Design Process: Noctura 400 Case Study’. Available on request

R5. Stuart English, Kirk, R., and Holland, M., ‘Cartridge, Medical Apparatus and Method’. Patent. (B publication Patents granted: in Europe 2015, China 2016, Australia 2016, Mexico 2016, USA 2017, Japan 2017, South Korea 2019, Canada 2020). Available on request

R6. Sarah Morehead, Stuart English, and Rafiq Elmansy ( 2019) Portfolio: Face masks to house hard Pod digital light therapy for DR. REF2 ID: 25950047

This portfolio explores the making of a mask to house a medical therapy for diabetic retinopathy. The aim was to experiment with new materials to construct a mask that fitted around the complex anatomical areas of the head and face addressing the issue of non-compliance from patients in wearing the mask due to lack of comfort during sleep that inhibits their ability to receive the therapy. Available on request

4. Details of the impact

English and colleagues’ research with PolyPhotonix led to four main forms of impact: 1) product development, 2) improving health and wellbeing of individuals living with DR, 3) commercial/economic benefits for PolyPhotonix and 4) economic and infrastructure development in the sustainable healthcare sector.

4.1 Applying MPPF and empathetic design to design of the Noctura 400

Working with Northumbria enabled PolyPhotonix to define the parameters of, and subsequently develop, the Noctura 400 – a sleep mask delivering light therapy via [text removed for publication] OLEDs to treat DR. This product has been granted patents around the world between 2015-2020 as a direct result of the application of MPPF (Europe, China, USA, Mexico, Australia, Japan, South Korea, and Canada) [ E1]. Richard Kirk, the CEO of PolyPhotonix, explained the contribution of engaging with English’s research and how the ‘ Noctura 400 improved significantly due to our work with Dr English’s research… [we] applied his MPPF model in the development of the Noctura 400’ [ E2]. Kirk continues, ‘ [a]s a direct result of the MPPF, we gained vital new perspectives on user-needs and new insights into how the product could meet them’ [ E2]. Embedded collaboration with English enabled PolyPhotonix to address issues with their original product by refining the design of the fabric mask to make it more breathable and low-profile (Fig.1). The European Patent Specification attests to the innovations of the Noctura 400 and how it meets needs for patient accessibility through a slimmer profile, onboard power rather than cable supply, and easily replaceable cartridge that accords with, and supports, how people best use these devices consistently in their homes [ E3, E4]. The Noctura 400 incorporates the treatment pod and the fabric mask design that were developed at Northumbria University to meet the product-needs revealed through application of the MPPF process.

Embedded imageEmbedded image A

B

Figure 1: A – the original fabric mask design, B – the final mask design developed at Northumbria University.

4.2 Improving the health and wellbeing of individuals living with DR through the Noctura 400

[text removed for publication] [ E5]. A later study from Ashford and St Peter’s NHS Hospital saw 98% of patients achieve a beneficial outcome, with 66% enjoying stabilisation of their eyesight (preventing further degeneration) and 32% experiencing measurable improvement in their eyesight [ E6, p2]. As a ‘ non-invasive and monitored home care treatment’ the Noctura 400 avoids the patient-discomfort resulting from ‘laser treatment and/or injections of anti-VEGF pharmaceuticals directly into the eye’ [ E5]. Moreover, success with existing treatments is not assured and these procedures carry risks, including damage to the eye [ E7]. The Noctura 400 is undergoing clinical trials before it can be prescribed for wide-scale use by the NHS; however, it is already being used by ‘ private patients in the UK, U.S.A, Belgium, France, [text removed for publication] , Brazil, Oman, Portugal’ to preserve and/or improve their sight [ E2].

In addition to offering a more comfortable and less-invasive treatment, the self-administered nature of the Noctura 400 reduces the burden of treatment for patients and clinics (e.g., substantial clinical time and regular hospital attendance) by facilitating remote use and continued monitoring [ E5]. The Covid-19 crisis highlighted the potential individual and public health costs of intensive healthcare infrastructure for patients and clinical staff [ E8]. Ashford and St Peter’s NHS Hospital, who has patients using the mask, said that ‘ during the coronavirus pandemic the mask can help diabetic patients, who find it difficult to attend retinopathy screening and eye clinic appointments… it is likely that diabetic patients who cannot attend surgeries and hospitals for medical treatment – as many clinic appointments are being cancelled – are further risking their eyesight’ [ E8].

4.3 Commercial/economic benefits to PolyPhotonix resulting from the Noctura 400

Northumbria’s work with PolyPhotonix, in developing the Noctura 400, had a significant impact on the success and future business strategy of the company. The Noctura 400’s ‘intellectual property has attracted external funds of over GBP 18 million [GBP18,000,000] including a recent £2 million [GBP2,000,000] investment from a New York bank to support business development’ [ E2]. [text removed for publication] [ E2].

While the sleep mask is in the early stages of commercialisation, PolyPhotonix has sold 5,000 units to 954 patients and 63 treatment centres, generating a turnover of GBP450,000 [ E2]. Due to this success PolyPhotonix altered their business strategy to a sole focus on the Noctura 400, and now this product ‘ accounts for all of the company’s sales’ and underpinned its international expansion [ E2]. PolyPhotonix has signed license deals in France, Brazil, Argentina, Oman, with further deals being negotiated in Japan and Portugal [ E2].

4.4 [text removed for publication]

[text removed for publication]

5. Sources to corroborate the impact

Ref. Source of corroboration Link to claimed impact
E1 Granted Patents: English, S. Kirk, R. Holland, M. ‘Cartridge, Medical Apparatus and Method’ Europe: EP2686066 (B1), 2015-09-23 China: CN103596621 (B), 2016-05-18 USA: US9849303 (B2), 2017-12-26 Mexico: MX343529 (B), 2016-11-09 Japan: JP6241878 (B2), 2017-12-06 Australia: AU2012228054 (B2), 2016-07-07 Canada: CA2829816 (C) 2020-05-12 South Korea KR102043313 (B1) 2019-11-11 Proof of innovative nature of the research, global reach, and commercial significance
E2 Testimonial - Richard Kirk, CEO of PolyPhotonix ltd. Confirms the contribution of Northumbria research to improving the efficiency of the Noctura 400, with positive results for the company
E3 English, S. Hewitt, I. Kirk, R. Holland, M. European Community Design Registration: 002298729-0001 Proof of innovative nature of the research
E4 European Patent Specification Confirms innovations of Noctura 400 as original product drawing from English’s research
E5 North East Times - ‘Novel treatment developed at Netpark helping diabetic patients during lockdown’ April 27th 2020 Benefit for patients of the Noctura 400
E6 Analysis of the RENDER NHS Project – Real-world Evaluation of Noctura 400 sleep mask for Diabetic Retinopathy – presentation August 2020 Benefit for patients of the Noctura 400
E7 Noctura Website Video https://noctura.com/ Provides context on device and patient feedback on the benefits of the device
E8 The Northern Echo - ‘Sedgefield firm's light therapy masks help treat diabetic retinopathy during Covid-19’ April 30th 2020 Benefit for patients of home-based and non-invasive treatment through the Noctura 400 in light of the additional challenges arising from the Covid19 pandemic
E9 Testimonial - Dr Arun Harish, Strategy Director for CPI National Centre of Healthcare Photonics website Confirming Dr English’s and the MPPF technique’s role in shaping the early product development processes and securing government investment in the Healthcare Photonics centre
Submitting institution
University of Northumbria at Newcastle
Unit of assessment
32 - Art and Design: History, Practice and Theory
Summary impact type
Societal
Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
No

1. Summary of the impact

75 years after the liberation of Auschwitz, there is now an urgent need to find new, affective ways of communicating the lived experience of the remaining survivors. Research by Jane Arnfield combined innovative performance methodologies with interview techniques derived from sociology, to excavate and re-enact historic witness testimony, allowing audiences to ‘inhabit’ survivors’ stories. Arnfield’s ‘Living Memorial Theatre Methodology’ formed the basis for major theatrical productions, including The Tin Ring (performed by Arnfield in 16 countries world-wide, across diverse audiences). This work provided major commemoration organisations, including Marek Edelman Dialogue Centre (Poland) and the Defiant Requiem Foundation (USA), with new approaches to engage audiences in an affective memorial process. The research also underpinned Arnfield’s reflective programme ‘Suitcase of Survival’, delivered to over 20 secondary schools across the North of England, including Holocaust Beacon institutions. With its emphasis on ‘rehumanising’ sensitive subject matter, the work improved understanding among education and creative practitioners, including those from the Holocaust Education Trust, enhancing traditional curriculum delivery methods. The insights transformed strategy at The Forge (UK Arts charity), enabling them to secure GBP150,000 National Portfolio funding from Arts Council England.

2. Underpinning research

The process of performance as Living Memorial has been developed by Arnfield to meet the pressing needs of Holocaust memorialisation, namely, how best to record and effectively convey the personal testimony of those remaining survivors. Arnfield’s research within the Department of Arts, which draws on her expertise as a director, writer, and performer, centres on the Theatre of the Real – a field that includes a wide range of theatre practices and styles that recycle reality, be it personal, social, political, or historical. Her distinctive contribution to this area has been the development of a new practice-led ‘Living Memorial Theatre Methodology’, which deploys methodologies derived from sociology in order to address the specific relationship between reality, truth, and authenticity [ R1]. This approach has enabled interdisciplinary research that specialises in the creation of monodramas (played by a single performer, often Arnfield herself) and choral works in ensemble, based on survivors’ testimony and historical narratives.

Through investigating discourses of memory and how its rendering can support acts of public commemoration, Arnfield’s novel methodology enables performance participants to remember the past as filtered through the present. This approach was developed by identifying synergies between (auto) biographical theatre practice and ethnographic and archival study in the social sciences [ R1]. The combination of performance with oral history and biographical research, serves both the arts and social justice in the process, enabling lost or silent voices within archives, community groups, and individual testimony to be reheard and re-experienced [ R1-R3].

Arnfield’s solo performance The Tin Ring ( TTR) was developed from a reflective process, which sought to better understand the efficacy of verbatim testimony as a route towards improved understanding of the causes and consequences of genocide and mass violence. Co-adapted by Arnfield and theatre director/writer Mike Alfreds, TTR is based on the witness testimony of Holocaust survivor Zdenka Fantlová. This intense monologue places contemporary spectators in a position of ‘active witness’ to historical events [ R2].

Arnfield worked with Fantlová using biographical narrative interviewing methods, a technique for accessing the life story of interviewees without bias from the interviewer (in this case, survival mechanisms Fantlová deployed throughout WWII). This approach incorporated material from Fantlová’s personal memoir, deployed alongside archival research from the Imperial War Museum (London & North), the Living History Forum (Stockholm, Sweden), the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum (Washington, D.C.), and Radegast Station Museum (Łódź, Poland) [ R2]. Since 2013, TTR has been performed by Arnfield in sixteen countries worldwide, to a combined audience of approximately 10,000, and has been utilised by Arts Council England as a national case study for best practice in attracting new and diverse audiences (2013) [ R2].

Extending the research methodologies of TTR, Arnfield developed the Suitcase of Survival ( SOS), a participatory programme run in tandem with the production of TTR, which explores human rights, human resilience, and well-being. SOS is a flexible programme that has been adapted for different contexts, including theatre-making with young people, creative resilience training schemes, workshops in schools, and public engagement activities. SOS was developed in collaboration with regional arts partner The Forge (a registered UK Arts charity and an Arts Council National Portfolio Organisation). Funded by the Kobler Trust and Lord & Lady Shipley, SOS adapted Arnfield’s performative and reflective methodologies to an educational environment, providing new routes by which the complex issues of genocide can be brought to new audiences [ R1].

In 2019, research undertaken by Arnfield during her Leverhulme Trust International Academic Fellowship with the Centre for Biographical Research and Oral History (University of Łódź, Poland), formed the basis of Ten to Ten (TTT) a series of choral productions performed at 4 historically significant sites across the City of Łódź [ R3]. These formed part of the 75th commemoration of the liquidation of the Łódź Ghetto. The libretto developed by Arnfield for TTT was based on the writing of Holocaust survivor and ghetto resident Chava Rosenfarb, the poetry of Czeslaw Milosz, and SOS workshops run by Arnfield with young patients recovering from addiction at the MONAR rehabilitation centre in Łódź. Pre-WWII, Łódź was home to the second-largest Jewish community in Poland, but today the city has almost no Jewish residents and is notably mono-ethnic, its past histories revealed primarily through low visibility static monuments. Arnfield worked with stakeholders to disrupt traditional modes of encountering history as mediated through fixed textual archives, monuments, and designated days. Instead, she sought to demonstrate the value of more embodied modes of engagement with the past and its subsequent definition.

3. References to the research

R1. Jane Arnfield Suitcase of Survival: Performance, Biography and Intercultural Education’ in Crutchfield, J and Schewe, M. (eds), Going Performative in Intercultural Education: International Contexts, Theoretical Perspectives and Models of Practice 216-232 (Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 2017). ISBN: 9781783098545. Available on request

R2. Jane Arnfield ‘The Tin Ring’ Northumbria University (2011-2013) www.thetinring.com Collection of Creative and Critical Work A mono drama co-created and performed by Arnfield, 70mins. Submitted as part of REF2 in 2014. Supported by two Arts Council England grants (2011 and 2012), performed in sixteen countries worldwide in theatres, museums, libraries, schools and at conferences to approximately 10,000 adults and children. Alongside the theatre production Arnfield has developed ‘Suitcase of Survival’ (SOS), multimodal education programme delivered with arts partner The Forge. Film of production available on request.

R3. Jane Arnfield ‘Ten to Ten’ Northumbria University ( 2019)

Collection of Creative and Critical Work. Director/librettist Arnfield; composer Katie Doherty; performers Choir Zydowski CLIL (conductor Magdalena Szymańska); set (designer Arnfield/printer Alfons Bytautas) commissioned by Marek Edelman Dialogue Centre, Łódź. Eight performances (25.09.19- 1.10.19) Audience 1,000 (estimate). Submitted to REF2021.

Research Funding

G1. PI Leverhulme International Academic Fellowship, 2018, GBP20,897

G2 . PI Arts Council England, 2011, GBP9,000 (15973942); 2012 GBP30,000 (19951892)

4. Details of the impact

Arnfield’s novel methodology, which translates the voices of survivors into powerful dramatic and choral productions, has provided new ways to enhance the work of international commemoration organisations by connecting diverse audiences with the Holocaust memorial process, as well as supporting new educational approaches and learning practices.

4.1 Connecting with diverse audiences to support effective Holocaust commemoration

The Living Memorial Theatre Methodology, as deployed in Arnfield’s adaptation of The Tin Ring ( TTR) and associated Suitcase of Survival programme ( SOS), has supported activities at an international level to commemorate and educate audiences about the Holocaust and critical themes associated with it – resilience, resistance, and reconciliation. Since featuring in the British Council International Edinburgh Showcase (August 2013), TTR has been performed on over 100 occasions, in a wide range of educational and cultural settings including important heritage sites [ E1, E2]. The majority of these performances were invited commissions, with Arnfield’s work requested to support key commemorative events such as Holocaust Memorial Day, the anniversary of the liberation of Terezín Internment Camp, and the anniversaries of the deportation of Western European Jews to the Łódź Ghetto and its subsequent liquidation. TTR has also been performed as part of specific exhibitions at museums specialising in the exploration of Genocide (including Sydney Jewish Museum, Imperial War Museum North, and POLIN Warsaw) [ E1].

The effect of the TTR adaption has been to pass on the truth of the story to audiences. For instance, the New York Theatre Guide highlighted how the integrity of the solo performance and Arnfield’s approach to it, allowed the central message of resilience and refusal to accept the role of victim to be conveyed with the power it deserves, ‘the verbatim testimonial theatrical form allows Zdenka’s words to flow through Jane … the eyewitness account reverberated through the audience and we could collectively grieve for those who have been and continue to be tortured and dehumanized by genocide’ [ E2].

Arnfield’s collaboration with the Defiant Requiem Foundation (DRF) - a major, US-based creative arts charity - demonstrates the significant contribution that her research has made to major Holocaust commemorative programmes. DRF presented TTR for the 70th anniversary liberation of Theresienstadt Concentration Camp (May 2015), and a large memorial event hosted at the National Hall in New York (May 2016) [ E3]. Arnfield’s work directly supported the foundation’s goal ‘ to provide new insights into our understanding of what it meant to resist and defy attempts to suppress the human spirit during the Holocaust’ [ E3]. Praised by attendees, including those from among the 600 individuals who attended the event in New York, DRF confirmed that Arnfield’s performance allowed them to ‘ connect directly with our target audiences’ [ E3] . The foundation also noted that for many of the attendees this was their first contact with their work and mission, and Arnfield’s role ‘ was very important... in terms of helping us to reach new audiences’ [ E3].

Similar results were achieved through Arnfield’s involvement in the Defiant Voices programme (led by DRF), which included a series of creative/educational workshops facilitated by Arnfield (in partnership with the Forge) that explored themes of memory and resilience [ E3-E4]. DRF confirmed how the work helped them to attract approximately 1000 visitors to the signature performance at Durham Cathedral during Holocaust memorial week (2018) [ E3]. The event went on to be awarded ‘The Journal Culture Awards, Performance of the Year’ [ E4]. Murry Sidlin, DRF President, noted how [Arnfield’s] exceptional use of a one-person/ witness-testimony format provided memorable results …and proves that strength, elegance, and simplicity of storytelling can be just as effective as any large-scale production [ E3]. Indeed, the ‘ creative expertise’ and novel techniques deployed in the TTR, inspired Sidlin to create a new drama, which since August 2019 has become ‘ an integral part of [their core programme] and is further demonstration of the positive influence that our collaboration with Arnfield has had on both [Sidlin personally] and the Foundation’ [ E3] .

Arnfield’s work also played a key role in supporting other major commemorative operations. The Marek Edelman Dialogue Centre (MEDC ), a secular-cultural institution based in Łódź, Poland that promotes the multi-cultural legacy of the city, has worked in close partnership with Arnfield since 2016. Her research supported a city-wide programme, led by MEDC, to mark the 75th anniversary of the deportation of Western Jews to the Litzmannstadt Ghetto. MEDC confirmed how Arnfield’s novel approach helped to ‘ animate and bring a personal resonance to the difficult events/issues that we aimed to educate our audiences about’ [ E5]. This supported their main organisational aim of improving awareness and education relating to the Holocaust, [Arnfield] played an invaluable role in ensuring that the inspirational story of Zdenka Fantlová is never forgotten, whilst also raising profound questions about the human condition and how to respond to traumatic episodes of mass violence’ [ E5].

In 2019, during the 75th Anniversary of the Liquidation of the Łódź Ghetto, Arnfield collaborated with MEDC again to create and stage Ten to Ten (TTT). The MEDC Director, noted how Arnfield’s work was ‘extremely well received by those who engaged with our commemorative programme’ [ E5]. MEDC recognised that Arnfield’s unique methods *‘works outside the normal Holocaust Education routes to raise awareness of individual Holocaust testimony’ [ E5].The success of this novel approach however, ‘ has certainly changed [MEDC’s] approach to future learning/ memorialisation activities. It is the adaptability of Jane’s performative and directorial work, underpinned by clear academic rigour, that makes it such a powerful tool for spreading awareness about the Holocaust and the issues/ personal stories associated with it’ [ E5].

4.2 Commemoration of the Holocaust with new educational approaches

Arnfield’s work on the Suitcase of Survival ( SOS) programme, in partnership with The Forge, has been delivered to more than 20 secondary schools across the North of England since 2014, helping to enhance traditional curriculum delivery [ E4]. One of the most successful programmes was with Y9 students in the Hermitage Academy, County Durham [ E4]. A designated Holocaust Beacon School (UCL Centre for Holocaust Education), the Academy is committed to enhancing teaching and learning about the Holocaust. The Executive Director of The Forge, has detailed how Arnfield’s adaptation of TTR formed the basis of a full term of work for a six-month period in 2017-18, and noted the success it had as a learning tool, ‘we frequently conduct post-project evaluation to inform future activity and the response is invariably positive’ [ E4]. For instance, The Forge confirmed how the use of SOS with another institution, Durham Sixth Form college, had ‘ influenced curriculum design [at the school] and undoubtedly developed student knowledge/understanding of the Holocaust’ [ E4].

As an organisation, The Forge have outlined how they ‘ benefited immensely’ from Arnfield’s involvement [ E4]. Working with Arnfield ‘ has placed the examination of Holocaust, exclusion and intolerance at the centre of our creative programme’. The Living Memorial Methodology is now central to the Forge’s core delivery, ‘ it has been built into our strategic business plan, the impact of which since 2013 has been transformative for us as an organisation. [Arnfield] has helped us to develop a dynamic process enabling artists from all disciplines to create meaningful and challenging artwork with participatory practice at its heart’ [ E4]. The Forge confirmed how their collaboration with Arnfield was instrumental in the organisation securing National Portfolio funding from Arts Council England (GBP150,000), with Arnfield’s creative practice element representing a key component of their ACE Creative Case for Diversity [ E4].

Further examples of benefits to educational practice are demonstrated by Arnfield’s work with the Holocaust Education Trust (HET), which used her living memorial approach to expand the knowledge-base of their nationwide cohort of freelance educators. Her work provided the team with ‘ a different and effective way of engaging with survivor testimony’, with its emphasis on personal experience of particular importance: ‘ rehumanising is a key tenet of good Holocaust education ...The performance has certainly ensured that we are more aware of the beneficial uses of theatre in Holocaust memorialisation and education’ [ E6]. In addition, the lessons of tolerance and resilience arising from the research have been applied in other learning settings, including a community programme (Durham) to foster improved dialogue between residents and re-located migrant families from Syria, [ E7] , and schemes to support communities in Cambodia who are confronting the legacy of the Khmer Rouge [ E8].

Taken together, these multiple examples illustrate the direct benefits that audiences, participants, as well as creative and learning practitioners around the world have derived from Arnfield’s research. Murry Sidlin from the DRF concluded, ‘When the circumstances of history have created something cataclysmic, we know the facts almost immediately, but what we don’t know is the truth, and that’s what we get from Art. Jane’s work is a powerful example of this, demonstrating how innovative creative techniques can support the vital process of commemoration, reconciliation, and learning’ [ E3].

5. Sources to corroborate the impact

### Ref. ### Source of corroboration ### Link to claimed impact
E1 Full details of performance dates, venue, audience numbers for The Tin Ring/ SOS Supporting Holocaust commemoration, connecting with diverse audiences
E2 News Coverage and Review of Arnfield’s productions Supporting Holocaust commemoration, connecting with diverse audiences
E3 Statement, Murry Sidlin (President, Defiant Requiem Foundation) Supporting Holocaust commemoration
E4 Statement and SOS Evaluation, Tony Harrington (Executive Director, The Forge) Supporting Holocaust commemoration and learning activity
E5 Statement, Joanna Podolska (Director, Marek Edelman Centre for Dialogue) Supporting Holocaust commemoration and learning activity
E6 Statement and Workshop Feedback, Tom Jackson (LFA Education Officer, HET) Supporting Holocaust learning activity
E7 Statement, Malcom Fallow (CEO, East Durham Creates) Supporting community reconciliation and dialogue
E8 Statement, Jenny Pearson (VBNK Director) Supporting reconciliation process
Showing impact case studies 1 to 6 of 6

Filter by higher education institution

UK regions
Select one or more of the following higher education institutions and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No higher education institutions found.
Institutions

Filter by unit of assessment

Main panels
Select one or more of the following units of assessment and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No unit of assessments found.
Units of assessment

Filter by continued case study

Select one or more of the following states and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.

Filter by summary impact type

Select one or more of the following summary impact types and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.

Filter by impact UK location

UK Countries
Select one or more of the following UK locations and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No UK locations found.
Impact UK locations

Filter by impact global location

Continents
Select one or more of the following global locations and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No global locations found.
Impact global locations

Filter by underpinning research subject

Subject areas
Select one or more of the following underpinning research subjects and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No subjects found.
Underpinning research subjects