Skip to main

Impact case study database

The impact case study database allows you to browse and search for impact case studies submitted to the REF 2021. Use the search and filters below to find the impact case studies you are looking for.

Search and filter

Filter by

  • Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine
   None selected
  • 4 - Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience
   None selected
   None selected
   None selected
   None selected
   None selected
   None selected
Waiting for server
Download currently selected sections for currently selected case studies (spreadsheet) (generating)
Download currently selected case study PDFs (zip) (generating)
Download tags for the currently selected case studies (spreadsheet) (generating)
Currently displaying text from case study section
Showing impact case studies 1 to 3 of 3
Submitting institution
Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine
Unit of assessment
4 - Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience
Summary impact type
Health
Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
No

1. Summary of the impact

Upper limb disability due to neurological or musculoskeletal disease affects millions of people in the UK and worldwide. Physical therapy is beneficial, but requires high-intensity, repetitive training. Conventional physical therapy involves direct interactions between therapist and patient, which limits its delivery. To overcome this and reduce costs for upper limb physical therapy, Imperial Researchers invented ‘GripAbleTM’, a low-cost portable device that enables self-directed arm movement training. The Imperial College researchers commercialised it in 2018 as GripAble, Ltd., xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx It is now the most widely adopted technology in the UK upper limb therapy market.

2. Underpinning research

Arm and hand weakness after stroke should be treated with repetitive task training. However, conventional delivery in 1:1 sessions between patients and physical therapists limits the intensity with which this can be done. Robotic tools enabling self-directed therapy have long held promise to supplement arm training and reduce the need for continuous, direct interactions between physical therapists and patients, but previous arm rehabilitation robots were cumbersome and costly, limiting their practical application.

Addressing this, research at Imperial College showed that small robotic devices able to promote functional hand interactions with real objects provide effective rehabilitation both for the hand and the entire arm (1). The Imperial team also showed that arm weakness after stroke arises not only as a consequence of brain injury affecting motor pathways, but also from damage to cognitive networks, which can be trained using grip-control software games (2).

Combining these insights, the researchers developed a small, simple, mobile device (‘GripAbleTM’), which “gamifies” physical therapy exercises for improving functional arm and hand movements. Product design was optimised over several years using a patient-centred “double-diamond” process in collaboration with medical device designers from the Helen Hamlyn Centre, Royal College of Art. This involved hundreds of patients with varying arm-disabilities testing multiple iterations of hardware and software prototypes, in order to maximise the range of patients that could benefit from the innovation.

The device is innovative. It has a unique patented sensor mechanism (paired cantilevers) that enables highly-sensitive and robust force measurement, whilst also mimicking the flexibility of everyday objects. This flexible sensor design improves comfort, motivation and motor performance compared to standard rigid sensors (3). The device has also been tailored to the needs of physical therapists and allows for a range of exercises and remote assessments of both upper (shoulder/elbow) and lower (hand/wrist) arm.

Clinical studies have investigated accessibility and usability of GripAbleTM in real world scenarios. GripAbleTM was able to be used by 93% of unselected stroke patients with arm weakness (4). This makes it the most highly accessible technology for self-directed training in natural cohorts of stroke survivors with arm weakness.

Exercise intensity is one of the strongest modifiable factors determining physical recovery after stroke and providing the device to stroke inpatients (plus a single training session) increases the total time they perform arm exercises 2-fold, and exercise repetition counts 10-fold, compared to standard care (5). This study is the first clinical trial to show that a self-directed arm rehabilitation technology increases exercise intensity among unselected stroke patients, including those with severe arm disability and co-existing cognitive impairment, relative to standard care.

GripableTM also has been employed in research studies investigating optimal exercise training schedules for motor learning in stroke and in people with cerebral palsy. Motivation and performance gains using GripableTM were shown to improve further through collaborative exercises between abled and disabled people relative to training alone (6). This discovery was the basis for a £1,100,000 NIHR award which is developing the world’s first “Online Social Physiotherapy Network”, which is enabling directly interactive arm exercises between remotely located patients with each other or with healthy volunteers using either GripableTM or standard mobile phones/tablets.

3. References to the research

(1) Lambercy, O., Dovat, L., Yun, H., Wee, S.K., Kuah, C.W.K., Chua, K.S.G., Gassert, R., Milner, T.E., Chee Teo, C.L., Burdet, E. (2011). Effects of a robot-assisted training of grasp and pronation/supination in chronic stroke: a pilot study. J Neuroeng Rehabil; 8:63. DOI.

(2) Rinne, P., Hassan, M., Fernandes, C., Han, E., Hennessy, E., Waldman, A., Sharma, P., Soto, D., Leech, R., Malhotra, P.A., Bentley, P. (2018). Motor dexterity and strength depend upon integrity of the attention-control system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA; 115(3):E536-E545. DOI.

(3) Mace, M., Rinne, P., Liardon, J.L., Uhomoibhi, C., Bentley, P., Burdet, E. (2017). Elasticity improves handgrip performance and user experience during visuomotor control. R Soc Open Sci; 4(2):160961. DOI.

(4) Rinne, P., Mace, M., Nakornchai, T., Zimmerman, K., Fayer, S., Sharma, P., Liardon, J.L., Burdet, E., Bentley, P. (2016). Democratizing neurorehabilitation: how accessible are low-cost mobile-gaming technologies for self-rehabilitation of arm disability in stroke? PLoS One; 11(10):e0163413. DOI.

(5) Broderick, M., Bentley, P., Burridge, J., Burdet, E. (2020). Self-administered gaming exercises for stroke arm disability Increase exercise duration by more than two-fold and repetition more than ten-fold compared to standard care. World Stroke Congress Abstracts. Int J Stroke. 2020 Nov 15(1S) 255. DOI.

(6) Mace, M., Kinany, N., Rinne, P., Rayner, A., Bentley, P.*, Burdet, E.* (2017). Balancing the playing field: collaborative gaming for physical training. J Neuroeng Rehabil; 14(1):116. (*co-corresponding authors). DOI.

4. Details of the impact

Functional impairments of arm and hand movement comprise the commonest stroke related disabilities, affecting 75% of the 100,000 new stroke cases each year in the UK. Guidance from the Royal College of Physicians in 2016 and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in 2013 recommended that arm weakness after stroke should be treated with repetitive task training, outcomes of which are dependent on frequency and repetition. However, the amount of upper limb therapy provided on the NHS is markedly less than what is known to be effective because of inadequate provision of therapists delivering services [ A]. Although UK NICE guidelines recommend at least 45 minutes of therapy per day for meaningful improvements after a stroke, the 2019-20 UK national stroke audit showed that actual inpatient therapy is an average 25 minutes per day, which decreases still further when patients were discharged [ B].

Conventional physical rehabilitation requires 1:1 interactions between a physical therapist and patient and therefore is expensive to deliver and limited by staff time. Service provision could be improved for better patient outcomes using technologies enabling patient-directed rehabilitation. This is not a new idea, but previous rehabilitation technologies were not widely adopted because of unit costs, complexity, and special site requirements. To address these challenges, researchers at Imperial College developed ‘GripAbleTM’, a low-cost, accessible, mobile patient-directed upper limb rehabilitation device. GripAbleTM was designed to enable a broad range of patients with arm disability to engage in self-directed arm training without the need for professional supervision, including those with severe weakness and cognitive impairment. It can be used by patients in their homes, as well as in hospitals, with the option that home performance can be monitored by physical therapists or doctors logging in remotely.

GripAbleTM [ C] prototypes were used by therapists at Imperial College NHS Healthcare Trust and Imperial Private Healthcare to supplement standard upper rehabitation exercises for stroke and other neurological causes of arm weakness from early 2019. By 2020, the system was being offered to all patients with arm weakness as part of standard of care therapy; 10-20 new patients per month have been using the protocol system for part or the entirety of their hospital stay and, in selected cases, for up to several months post-discharge.

In the same year, Imperial College researchers founded Gripable Ltd to manufacture, distribute and further develop the system. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Gripable Ltd. launched its first GripableTM product line in Summer 2020. By the end of 2020, GripableTM was deployed to neurological and rehabilitation centres across 17 countries; xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx including the Royal Hospital for Neurodisability, North-West London, and Aldebourne Rehabilitation Centres, King’s College Hospital, St Georges NHS Trusts, Cereneo (Switzerland) [ D], Hobbs [ E], BMI, HCA, and 12 Centres in the USA, India, Canada, Singapore, S Korea, Japan, UAE, and Qatar. Measured in terms of units in use, GripableTM became the most adopted technology in the UK for upper limb rehabilitation by the end of 2020. It also is the only rehabilitation system shown to allow patients continued use in the transition from hospital-based rehabilitation to home and fully self-directed rehabitation [ C].

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx This demonstrates that as barriers to conventional physiotherapy increased and the number of supervised rehabilitation sessions dramatically decreased, GripAbleTM enabled patients to continue their essential rehabilitation exercises at home supervised remotely by their therapists using the patient’s online performance records.

While thus far GripAbleTM has predominantly benefited stroke patients, it is now increasingly used in the treatment of a wider range of conditions. GripAbleTM’s digital register currently includes xxxx patients with a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis, traumatic brain or spinal cord injury, peripheral neuropathy, Parkinson’s disease, arthritis, sporting injuries or complex hand surgery [ C]. Furthermore, at Great Ormond Street and the PACE Centre children with cerebral palsy and neurodevelopmental disorders are now using GripAble as part of their treatment.

The availability of GripAbleTM has added to options for upper limb physical rehabilitation endorsed by the Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Neurology [ F]. The President of the Association, Prof. Jane Burridge wrote:

“[GripAble] fulfils a need for higher intensity, home-based, self-administered rehabilitation that cannot be practically met by increasing therapist numbers given NHS resource constraints… ACPIN fully support the translation of GripAble into routine clinical use and have actively supported dissemination of the evidence and information about the device.”

GripAbleTM also has had an impact on therapies recommended by other national rehabilitation information sites such as the UK’s leading online disability lifestyle magazine (AbleMagazine) [G]. Use by Key Opinion Leaders and Rehabilitation Centres was highlighted by a Parliamentary Under Secretary of State at the Department of Health and Social Care [ H].

5. Sources to corroborate the impact

[ A] Repetitive task training can help recovery after stroke (2017). NIHR Alert. DOI.

[ B] Stockley, R., Peel, R., Jarvis, K., et al . (2019). Current therapy for the upper limb after stroke: a cross-sectional survey of UK therapists. BMJ Open;9 **:**e030262. DOI.

[ C] Letter of Commercial Traction signed by Paul Rinne, CEO.

[ D] https://www.cereneo.ch/your-rehabilitation/#rehabilitation-at-home

(World-leading Swiss neurorehabilitation centre features GripAble within its training schedule:” 11:00 Video call with the neurologist: A key element of your cereneo @ Home programme is the exchange with our neurologist who represents the network and knowledge of cereneo`s interprofessional team of experts. In this video call, the neurologist will share the latest results from your rehabilitation assessment and the data generated by your Gripable training device with you and discuss the suggested changes in your daily rehabilitation routine.” Archived here.

[ E] https://www.hobbsrehabilitation.co.uk/gripable.htm/

And https://twitter.com/HobbsRehab/status/983798826715746305/photo/1

(well-established UK network of 10 rehabilitation centres features GripAble within their training schedule). Archived here.

[ F] https://www.acpin.net/

(GripAble is highlighted on the home page); https://gripable.co/tag/acpin/ ; letter from Prof. Jane Burridge, President of the Association Chartered Physiotherapists in Neurology.

[ G] https://ablemagazine.co.uk/gripable-beating-the-rehabilitation-grind/ (Archived here).

[ H] Key Opinion Leaders and Rehabilitation Centres:

https://twitter.com/nicolablackwood/status/1181947913011961857/photo/1 (archived here)

(Baroness Blackwood: Parliamentary Under Department of Health and Social Care [tweet: 09/10/19)

https://www.stroke.org.uk/research/research-events/amazing-brains-2019 (archived here).

Lecture by Jane Burridge features Gripable 9:20 – 10:10

https://youtu.be/8lFYbyPMlIQ (Archived here).

Submitting institution
Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine
Unit of assessment
4 - Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience
Summary impact type
Health
Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
No

1. Summary of the impact

A lack of evidence on the cost-effectiveness of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has limited its clinical commissioning and utilisation in acute ischaemic stroke (AIS). Research at Imperial College established that MT is a highly cost-effective treatment for AIS, singularly underpinning the UK’s National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) policy recommendations supporting MT as a treatment for patients with AIS. This has had a significant impact on outcomes for patients with severe stroke deficits: between April 2019 and March 2020, 1,607 patients were treated by MT in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, with 70.3% experiencing improvement in their clinical outcome.

2. Underpinning research

Since 2012, thrombolysis with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV t-PA) has been the standard treatment for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in the UK. Subsequently, for patients with disabling strokes secondary to large vessel occlusion, mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has emerged as a powerful new intervention.

Based on clinical trials, a 2014/2015 consensus statement by the European Stroke Organisation (ESO), European Society of Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy (ESMINT), European Society of Neuroradiology (ESNR) and European Academy of Neurology (EAN) stated MT was “recommended to treat acute stroke patients with large artery occlusions in the anterior circulation up to 6 hours after symptom onset”. Despite the clinical case supporting the use of MT for AIS, a lack of economic evidence to support its use, restricted the ability of individual hospital Trusts to invest in this service, and significantly delayed the national commissioning of MT for AIS in the UK.

To address this, Lobotesis led cost-utility analyses of MT for AIS from a UK payer perspective (1). The cost-effectiveness of MT for AIS was investigated using a Markov model developed to simulate health outcomes of competing therapies over short and lifetime time horizons. For stroke with symptom onset under 6 hours, Lobotesis found that combined MT (carried out predominantly with stent retrievers) and IV t-PA was associated with improved quality-of-life and increased life expectancy compared to IV t-PA alone (1, 2). The higher treatment costs associated with the use of stent-retriever thrombectomy were offset by substantial long-term savings due to improved health outcomes with reduced hospital stays and long-term care costs, leading to an estimated mean cost saving of £33,190 per patient treated. This translates to a saving of £39,800,000 in England, Wales and Northern Ireland for thrombectomies conducted between April 2018 and March 2019. NHSE estimates that 10,140 patients per year may be clinically eligible for MT once national implementation is complete. Over seven lifetime quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were estimated to be gained by using stent-retriever MT with a net monetary benefit of £79,402 per QALY (3, 4).

In a continuation of this research, Lobotesis found that performing MT up to 24 hours following acute stroke symptom onset was also cost-effective. Over a 20-year period, the incremental cost per QALY of MT was £1,219 when performed after 12 hours from stroke onset, £4,096 after 16 hours and £2,894 after 24 hours. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated that MT had a 99.9% probability of being cost-effective based on the maximum cost the UK is commonly willing to pay per QALY (5).

In further work, based on systematic review and meta-analysis of the published literature (6), Lobotesis’s research has also had an impact on the development of practice guidelines for MT for AIS and treatment modality recommendations (addressing Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome (PICO) questions: PICO 3, PICO 11 and PICO 12). These are for use by hospitals in the UK and Europe based on the standard operating procedures (SOPs) of the European Stroke Organisation (using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation [GRADE] approach), and cover pre-hospital management and patient selection based on clinical and imaging criteria and MT treatment modality options.

3. References to the research

(1) Ganesalingam, J., Pizzo, E., Morris, S., Sunderland, T., Ames, D., Lobotesis, K. (2015). Cost-utility analysis of mechanical thrombectomy using stent retrievers in acute ischaemic stroke. Stroke; 46(9): 2591-2598. DOI.

(2) Lobotesis, K., Veltkamp, R., Carpenter, I.H., Claxton, L.M., Saver, J.L., Hodgson, R. (2016).Cost-effectiveness of stent-retriever thrombectomy in combination with IV t-PA compared with IV t-PA alone for acute ischemic stroke in the UK. Journal of Medical Economics; 19(8): 785-794. DOI.

(3) Arora, N., Makino, K., Tilden, D., Lobotesis, K., Mitchell, P., Gillespie, J. (2018). Cost-effectiveness of mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: an Australian payer perspective . Journal of Medical Economics;* 21(8): 799-809. DOI.

(4) Ruggeri, M., Basile, M., Zini, A., Mangiafico, S., Agostoni, C., Lobotesis, K., Saver, J., Coretti, S., Drago, C., Cicchetti, A. (2018). Cost-effectiveness analysis of mechanical thrombectomy with stent retriever in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke in Italy. Journal of Medical Economics; 21(9): 902-911. DOI.

(5) Pizzo, E., Dumba, M., Lobotesis, K. (2020). Cost-utility analysis of mechanical thrombectomy between 6 and 24 hours in acute ischemic stroke. International Journal of Stroke; 15(1): 75-84. DOI.

(6) Turc, G., Bhogal, P., Fischer, U., Khatri, P., Lobotesis, K., Mazighi, M., Schellinger, P.D., Toni, D., de Vries, J., White, P., Fiehler, J. (2019). European Stroke Organisation (ESO) – European Society for Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy (ESMINT) Guidelines on Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischaemic Stroke Endorsed by Stroke Alliance for Europe (SAFE). European Stroke Journal; 4(1): 6-12. DOI.

4. Details of the impact

In the UK each year, approximately 113,000 individuals suffer a stroke, 87% of which are of an ischaemic aetiology. There are around 1,000,000 stroke survivors who live with chronic stroke-related disability, the repercussions of which can be severe and widespread for both patients and carers. The current UK annual societal cost of stroke is £25.6 billion. Owing to the UK’s ageing population, these figures, based on retrospective data, are likely underestimates, as both the incidence of stroke and its economic burden from the needs for extensive hospitalisation and long-term care are rising each year. Currently, between 10,140 and 11,530 stroke patients per year in the UK could be eligible for MT, which approximates to 10% of all stroke admissions.

Despite the substantial evidence for the clinical effectiveness of MT for AIS, its use in routine practice in the UK had been limited by the lack of cost effectiveness data, especially given the significant costs of the procedure and its implementation. The latter challenges are related to high-level upfront investment required for an acute therapy like MT as well as the need for workforce training and service reconfiguration/integration in stroke and neuroscience centres nationwide.

Key to addressing this practical economic barrier to adoption in routine clinical practice was the demonstration that the associated long-term health benefits significantly outweighed the additional costs of the procedure. Research from Lobotesis at Imperial provided the first evidence of the substantial long-term cost savings that offset the higher treatment costs. These analyses, which are still the only UK-based cost-utility analyses of MT for AIS, singularly underpinned NICE policy recommendations in 2016, 2018 and 2019 that MT is a cost-effective treatment for patients with AIS in the UK [ A, B, C].

The analyses also led to MT being commissioned at Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (ICHT) in 2017 as a new flagship clinical service, and nationally by NHS England (NHSE) in 2019 [ D]. This national Clinical Commissioning Policy [ D] was based on the NICE Medtech innovation briefing, ‘Mechanical thrombectomy devices for acute ischaemic stroke’ [ B], which looked into the cost of MT devices and the subsequent resource impact in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, of the cost of the procedure. Overall, 12 cost-effectiveness studies were analysed, including 2 from a UK payer perspective, both of which were led by Dr Lobotesis and his team at Imperial.

Prior to 2017 and the policy recommendations underpinned by Lobotesis’ research, only 424 patients were treated with MT in England, Wales and Northern Ireland in the period 2015-2016 (2016 Acute Organisational Audit data). Between April 2019 and March 2020 (Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme [SSNAP] data), 1,607 patients were treated with MT by 26 teams across England, Wales and Northern Ireland [ E]. Nationally, 70.3% of treated patients who had a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score fully recorded on arrival and again 24 hours after thrombectomy, showed neurologic improvements. The research findings and clinical experience underpinned the development of guidelines for implementation of MT for AIS in the UK including business case development sponsored by the UK Stroke Association, NIHR and the Oxford Academic Health Sciences Network [ F].

Subsequent to establishing one of the first 24/7 comprehensive MT services, ICHT currently continues to be the largest MT service in the UK, receiving patients from across South West England. In 2020, a total of 201 stroke patients were treated with MT at ICHT. In the same period, an average of 56 MT procedures were performed in other neuroscience centres nationally. This adoption has also had a significant impact on outcomes for patients with severe deficits at ICHT. Of the 201 MT patients, 43% had Rankin scores 0-2 (“alive and independent”) and 81.6% achieved TICI2B/3 (“complete cerebral reperfusion”) angiographic outcomes [ E]. Subsequently the Stroke/Thrombectomy service at ICHT was awarded, in 2020, the Imperial Chair’s Award for its outstanding performance and excellent clinical outcomes.

The peer-reviewed published recommendations (detailed above) arising from these findings have been successfully endorsed and incorporated into local (ICHT), national (NICE, NHSE) and international (Stroke Alliance for Europe [SAFE], ESMINT) policy documents [ G].

5. Sources to corroborate the impact

[ A] NICE interventional procedures guideline 2016:

NICE mechanical clot retrieval for treating acute ischaemic stroke ( https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ipg548). This guidance made recommendations relating to the clinical effectiveness of MT for AIS but contained no guidance on cost effectiveness, and highlighted practice uncertainties relating to best type of imaging to guide patient selection, best kind of retrieval device and effectiveness of MT in patients with strokes in different parts of the brain. Archived here.

[ B] NICE technology briefing 2018:

NICE Medtech innovation briefing on mechanical thrombectomy devices for acute ischaemic stroke ( https://www.nice.org.uk/advice/mib153/chapter/Summary). The guidance cites Lobotesis research that MT for AIS is cost effective in the UK for stroke with symptom onset within 6 hours with cost savings over 20 years when compared to thrombolysis alone (text and Table 5 in the 2018 briefing). Archived here.

[ C] NICE guidelines for stroke and TIA 2019:

NICE stroke and transient ischaemic attack in over 16s: diagnosis and initial management ( https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng128). Page 25; the committee looked at the results of the published cost–utility analyses with a UK NHS by Lobotesis. The second of these studies demonstrated the cost effectiveness of thrombectomy therapy when performed 6 to 24 hours after stroke onset. “Therefore, the committee agreed to recommend thrombectomy up to 24 hours after stroke onset, for people with appropriate clinical and radiological characteristics”. Archived here.

[ D] NHS England Clinical Commissioning Policy: Mechanical Thrombectomy for acute ischaemic stroke (Reference 170033P). First published January 2018, Updated 29/0/2019. NHSE document concluding there is sufficient evidence to support the routine commissioning of mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischaemic stroke. Archived here.

[ E] The Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme (SSNAP) ( https://www.strokeaudit.org). This is a national audit programme collecting data on the implementation of thrombectomy in the UK to ensure treatment is provided safely and effectively. ICHT submits data on all patients treated to the SSNAP. Archived here.

[ F] https://bsnr.org.uk/_userfiles/pages/files/standards_and_guidelines/implementation_of_stroke_thrombectomy_guide_v1_29_april_2019.pdf (Archived here).

[ G] International standards/guidance 2019:

European stroke organisation Guideline Directory ( https://eso-stroke.org/eso-guideline-directory/). European Stroke Organisation (ESO) and European Society for Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy (ESMINT) Guidelines on Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischaemic Stroke endorsed by Stroke Alliance for Europe (SAFE). Published in European Stroke Journal February 2019 and co-published in Journal of Neurointerventional Surgery in February 2019. DOI.

Submitting institution
Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine
Unit of assessment
4 - Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience
Summary impact type
Technological
Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
No

1. Summary of the impact

Professor Seabra’s early research funded by the Choroideremia Research Foundation and Fight for Sight led to discovery of the biochemical basis for choroideremia and the subsequent development of tests for its specific diagnosis. Seabra along with Robert MacLaren and Matt During then developed a first gene therapy vector (NSR-REP1), leading to the first treatment trial and evidence for sustained arrest or significant improvement in vision for some of the patients treated. A successful spin-out company, Nightstar Therapeutics was created on these foundations, with NSR-REP1 as its lead programme. Nightstar gained significant investment, went public in 2017 and was subsequently acquired by Biogen in 2019 for approximately $800,000,000.

2. Underpinning research

Choroideremia is a rare disease of the eye affecting approximately 1 in 50,000 (predominantly males), causing progressive vision loss beginning usually in late childhood. The first signs are usually related to a loss of night vision (night blindness), followed by a reduction in the field of vision and a growing inability to discern details, depth and colour perception. This eventually leads to blindness in adulthood by the fourth decade.

The disease has long been without any cure. Choroideremia is caused by faults in the CHM gene. Professor Miguel Seabra, at Imperial College London, defined the biochemical basis for the disease for the first time, showing that a disease-associated CHM gene defect causes a certain protein - known as REP-1 - not to be produced in most cases. Lack of this protein causes pigment cells in the retina of the eye to deteriorate, leading to damage to the eye tissue. CHM gene defects are inherited on the X-chromosome, so that males are more likely to develop the condition in affected families, but females can pass the faulty CHM gene onto their children.

An important hurdle to developing a treatment was to learn where the disease starts in the retina. This could only be done by creating mouse models that could allow the course of the disease to be followed. Seabra achieved this using a newly developed method which allowed the deletion of the CHM gene in distinct layers of the retina of a mouse (called conditional mouse knock-outs) (1). Study of these models demonstrated that the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and photoreceptors degenerate independently. Importantly, he discovered that the greatest pathological effects occurred with expression of mutant protein in the retinal pigment epithelium layer, identifying it as the most important target layer for therapeutic correction (2).

Seabra and his colleagues then developed a serotype 2 adeno-associated viral vector AAV2/2-CBA-REP1 for therapeutic delivery of the human transgene and showed that sub-retinal injections of the vector to reach the retinal pigment layer improved retinal function in the mouse model (3).

A pioneering Phase 1/2 clinical trial to assess the effect of retinal gene therapy in collaboration with Prof Robert MacLaren at Oxford and Matthew During in Ohio was undertaken based on results in Seabra’s experimental system, defining the specific retinal pigment layer therapeutic target and the potential safety and efficacy of the vector (4). The results of the trial in 2014 indicated that after 6 months patients showed improvement in their vision in dim light and two of the six patients were able to read more lines on an eye chart. On the basis of this, the vectors and its uses were patented with Seabra, MacLaren and During as inventors.

3. References to the research

(1) Tolmachova, T., Anders, R., Abrink, M., Bugeon, L., Dallman, M.J., Futter, C.E., Ramalho, J.S., Tonagel, F., Tanimoto, N., Seeliger, M.W., Huxley, C., Seabra, M.C. (2006). Independent degeneration of photoreceptors and retinal pigment epithelium in conditional knockout mouse models of choroideremia. Journal of Clinical Investigation; 116(2): 386-94. DOI.

(2) Tolmachova, T., Wavre-Shapton, S.T., Barnard, A.R., MacLaren, R.E., Futter, C.E., Seabra, M.C. (2010). Retinal pigment epithelium defects accelerate photoreceptor degeneration in cell type-specific knockout mouse models of choroideremia. Investigative Ophthalmology & Vision Science; 51(10): 4913-20. DOI.

(3) Tolmachova, T., Tolmachov, O.E., Barnard, A.R., de Silva, S.R., Lipinski, D.M., Walker, N.J., Maclaren, R.E., Seabra, M.C. (2013). Functional expression of Rab escort protein 1 following AAV2-mediated gene delivery in the retina of choroideremia mice and human cells ex vivo. Journal of Molecular Medicine (Berl); 91(7): 825-37. DOI.

(4) MacLaren, R.E., Groppe, M., Barnard, A.R., Cottriall, C.L., Tolmachova, T., Seymour, L., Reed Clark, K., During, M.J., Cremers, F.P.M., Black, G.C.M., Lotery, A.J., Downes, S.M., Webster, A.R., & Seabra, M.C. (2014). Retinal gene therapy in patients with choroideremia: inital findings from a phase 1/2 clinical trial. Lancet; 383: 1129-37. DOI.

Key funding:

Choroideremia Research Foundation, 2002 - 2005, £21,220

Choroideremia Research Foundation, 2005 - 2006, £27,312

Choroideremia Research Foundation, 2006 - 2008, £87,314

Choroideremia Research Foundation, 2008 - 2009, £30,079

Choroideremia Research Foundation, 2009 - 2011, £104,320

Fight for Sight, 2007 – 2011, £150,000

Fight for Sight, 2011 – 2016, £182,752

4. Details of the impact

Choroideremia is a rare degenerative retinal disease which presents as night blindness and progressive visual field constriction from late childhood, leading to blindness in men typically in the fourth decade. Choroideremia presents in a milder form in women. It affects approximately 1 in 50,000 people. Neither specific diagnostics nor any treatment for the disease were available before the Imperial College research.

The preclinical work from Prof Miguel Seabra in defining the underlying biochemical mechanisms of choroideremia has had a major impact on its diagnosis and subsequent treatment. Diagnosis of the disease, which can be strikingly variable even within the same family, was based previously only on characteristic fundus findings and family history. Diagnoses in suspected cases can now be confirmed by direct genetic testing or through immunoblot analysis with anti-REP-1 antibody to differentiate it from related disorders, which could have both therapeutic and prognostic relevance [ A].

Seabra developed the first mouse models for the disease and discovered the cells in the retina responsible for initiating the disease. With MacLaren, he developed a therapeutic adeno-associated virus serotype 2 (AAV2) treatment vector, AAV-REP1, and showed its potential efficacy and safety with sub-retinal injection in the mouse. This led to a first-in-man clinical trial that provided first evidence for clinical benefits. Based on this, a successful patent (US20140107185A1) for invention of gene therapy of choroideremia based on retinal gene therapy using the human CHM transgene and methods of preventing or treating this disease using the vector was filed with MacLaren and During [ B].

With completion of the first trial and follow up of patients, Seabra, MacLaren and their colleagues were able to show the gene therapy had a profound impact on treatment for vision in some of those who received it. Sustained visual acuity gains were seen over a period of several years in end-stage eyes, in which rapid visual acuity loss would ordinarily be expected, with several patients experiencing gains of three lines or more, an improvement widely accepted to be clinically significant [ C]. Professor Robert MacLaren, the ophthalmologist who led the trial, said:

The early results of vision improvement we saw have been sustained for as long as we have been following up these patients and in several the gene therapy injection was over 5 years ago. The trial has made a big difference to their lives.” [ D].

The trial also led to surgical innovations in the development of an automated injection system directed by intraoperative retinal scanning using optical coherence tomography, that informed subsequent trials and whose impact has been to minimise surgical adverse events with the sub-retinal delivery of genetic therapies [ C].

The research has had substantial economic impact, in addition to that clinically. In 2014. the investigators formed a spinout company in conjunction with Isis Innovations in Oxford, NightstaRX Limited, (subsequently renamed Nightstar Therapeutics) in which Imperial College held an equity share. Treatment of choroideremia was the lead programme for Nightstar, which received series A, B, and C funding from Syncona Limited and other investors [ E].

The leading gene therapy programme, known as NSR-REP1, has been prosecuted in phase 1 and 2 trials, and the company started an international phase 3 study, the ‘STAR’ trial in 2018. Nightstar Therapeutics raised $75,000,000 through a NASDAQ IPO in 2017 [ F] to fund the phase 3 trial and its other programmes. Investment subsequently grew to $500,000,000 [ G]. In July 2019, Biogen acquired Nightstar for over $800,000,000 to boost its clinical ophthalmology assets, where gene therapy for choroideremia (NSR-REP1) was noted as the lead asset being purchased [ H].

5. Sources to corroborate the impact

[ A] Zinkernagel, M.S., MacLaren, R.E. (2015). Recent advances and future prospects in choroideremia. Clinical Ophthalmology; 9: 2195-2200. DOI.

[ B] https://patents.justia.com/patent/20140107185#history (Archived here).

[ C] Xue, K., Jolly, J.K., Barnard, A.R., Rudenko, A., Salvetti, A.P., Patrício, M.I., Edwards, T.L., Groppe, M., Orlans, H.O., Tolmachova, T., Black, G.C., Webster, A.R., Lotery, A.J., Holder, G.E., Downes, S.M., Seabra, M.C., MacLaren, R.E. (2018). Beneficial effects on vision in patients undergoing retinal gene therapy for choroideremia. Nature Medicine; 24(10): 1507-1512. DOI.

[ D] https://www.fightforsight.org.uk/our-research/inherited-eye-diseases/world-first-gene-therapy-that-is-already-restoring-sight/#:~:text=Professor%20Robert%20MacLaren%20the%20ophthalmologist,big%20difference%20to%20their%20lives.%E2%80%9D (Archived here)

[ E] https://www.curechm.org/2017/10/nightstar-therapeutics-raises-75-million-in-ipo-to-fund-pivotal-phase-3-gene-therapy-study/ (Archived here).

[ F] https://www.synconaltd.com/media/1379/nightstar-timeline-2019-08-15.pdf (Archived here).

[ G] https://www.clustermarket.com/articles/nightstar-therapeutics (Archived here).

[ H] http://investors.biogen.com/news-releases/news-release-details/biogen-completes-acquisition-nightstar-therapeutics (Archived here).

Showing impact case studies 1 to 3 of 3

Filter by higher education institution

UK regions
Select one or more of the following higher education institutions and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No higher education institutions found.
Institutions

Filter by unit of assessment

Main panels
Select one or more of the following units of assessment and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No unit of assessments found.
Units of assessment

Filter by continued case study

Select one or more of the following states and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.

Filter by summary impact type

Select one or more of the following summary impact types and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.

Filter by impact UK location

UK Countries
Select one or more of the following UK locations and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No UK locations found.
Impact UK locations

Filter by impact global location

Continents
Select one or more of the following global locations and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No global locations found.
Impact global locations

Filter by underpinning research subject

Subject areas
Select one or more of the following underpinning research subjects and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No subjects found.
Underpinning research subjects