Skip to main

Impact case study database

The impact case study database allows you to browse and search for impact case studies submitted to the REF 2021. Use the search and filters below to find the impact case studies you are looking for.

Search and filter

Filter by

  • Aberystwyth University / Prifysgol Aberystwyth
   None selected
  • 4 - Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience
   None selected
   None selected
   None selected
   None selected
   None selected
   None selected
Waiting for server
Download currently selected sections for currently selected case studies (spreadsheet) (generating)
Download currently selected case study PDFs (zip) (generating)
Download tags for the currently selected case studies (spreadsheet) (generating)
Currently displaying text from case study section
Showing impact case studies 1 to 2 of 2
Submitting institution
Aberystwyth University / Prifysgol Aberystwyth
Unit of assessment
4 - Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience
Summary impact type
Societal
Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
No

1. Summary of the impact

Working collaboratively with the Ceredigion Youth Justice and Prevention Services (CYJPS), Dr Norris developed a bespoke risk assessment tool (CYSTEM) which changed the practice of assessment for young people referred across the four Dyfed-Powys Youth Offending Teams. CYSTEM enabled the diversion of over a third of low-risk offenders from formal criminal justice involvement; and for resources to be targeted at higher risk individuals who were most likely to benefit from targeted interventions. Alongside the impact on individual local stakeholders, the expertise generated informed policy for the Youth Justice Service (YJS), Police, Youth Justice Board (YJB), and the Home Office both in the UK and overseas.

2. Underpinning research

An analysis of the declining crime rates since 2005 by Griffith and Norris [3.1], identified that an overall reduction in the number of offenders over the 2005 to 2015 period is closely linked to a significant reduction (45%) in the proportion of the youth population that offends in any given year. In addition, the number of youth offenders appeared to have contributed to a ‘knock on’ effect on the number of adults offending in subsequent years. In essence, this is the outcome of young people not offending [when young], who subsequently did not go on to offend as adults. This analysis highlighted the importance of various policy initiatives designed to address youth crime and anti-social behaviour, such as the National Strategy for the Policing of Children and Young People and a move towards welfare-based approaches for lower-level youth offending.

To this end, through a funded collaboration with Ceredigion Youth Justice Practice Services (CYJPS) [3.6], a risk assessment tool - the Ceredigion Youth Screening Tool (CYSTEM) - was designed and implemented in 2016, to take a pragmatic approach to the diversion of young people out of the formal Youth Justice system.

This screening tool addresses the two linked factors of risk of offending (ROF) and risk of vulnerability (ROV). It is a pre-screen tool to reduce both the administrative burden and the potential for stigmatisation of the young people being referred (‘Child First’ approach) to the Youth Justice system. The tool was initially informed largely by reference to existing practice inventories (predominantly ASSET), but with significant input from case managers and senior assessment staff. CYSTEM assesses six core facets identified as predictors of later offending: ROF: Criminal/ antisocial thoughts; Criminal/ antisocial environment; Criminal/ antisocial behaviour; ROV: Looked after child/ child in need/ social service/ disability; Living with perpetrator of DV and/ or sexual exploitation; Reckless/ harmful behaviour (inc. sexual). The presence of one of these features during screening necessitates a formal ASSET assessment; for those identified as very low risk (i.e., not scoring on any of the key indicators), then no formal intervention is enacted. Sensitivity analysis (AUC) indicated that there was a moderate level of predictive capacity in being able to identify the likely future offenders from the non-offenders. In this domain, the screening tool showed comparable discriminant validity as similar tools. [3.2]

Following the development of CYSTEM, the Home Office funded two phases of targeted intervention with CYJPS with Norris as programme evaluator- SOC-1 and SOC-2 [3.7]. The Risk-Needs-Responsivity (RNR) model- a process well established in the correctional literature, that advocates the allocation of individuals to appropriate interventions based on their individual circumstances and requirements- demonstrates that medium to high-risk offenders, are significantly more responsive to high quality intervention work, than most low-risk offenders [3.3]. Utilising the CYSTEM tool, cohorts of high-risk young offenders were identified as suitable referrals to undertake a range of interventions designed to address issues of vulnerability to exploitation and Serious and Organized Crime (SOC) activities, including sexual exploitation and drug supply networks, ‘County Lines’. The interventions consisted of 6 weeks of structured activities that covered topics including web safety, mood and emotions, and substance misuse. The impact of these interventions was measured through a decrease in offending frequency, intensity and reduction in risk profiles, alongside psychological indices including well-being and resilience [3.4; 3.5].

3. References to the research

  1. Griffith, G., Norris, G. (2019), Explaining the crime drop: contributions to declining crime rates from youth cohorts since 2005, Crime, Law and Social Change, 73: pp. 25–53. DOI: 10.1007/s10611-019-09846-5

  2. Norris, G., Griffith, G., West, M. (2018), Validation of Ceredigion Youth Screening Tool (CYSTEM), International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62(12): pp. 3727-3745. DOI: 10.1177/0306624X17752299

3.3 Norris, G., Griffith, G., Norris, H. N. (2017), Risk Assessment in Youth Justice: A Child-Centered Approach to Managing Interventions, in Petherick, W., & Sinnamon, G. (eds.), The Psychology of Criminal and Antisocial Behavior: Victim and Offender Perspectives, (London: Elsevier: Academic Press): pp. 211-229.

3.4 Norris, G., Serious and Organised Crime (SOC) Intervention – Phase 1. Ceredigion Youth Justice and Prevention Service and the Home Office, May 2018, (Aberystwyth University).

3.5 Norris, G., Ceredigion SOC Evaluation: Summary report of the Ceredigion Serious and Organised Crime Intervention – Phase 2, July 2019, (Aberystwyth University).

Associated funding

3.6 Development of a risk assessment tool: The Youth Justice Board: (15 April 2014 - 31 March 2015): Award: GBP8,000.00. Norris (PI).

3.7 Evaluation of serious and organised crime intervention: Home Office: (1 September 2018 - 31 May 2019): Award: GBP10,219.53. Norris (PI).

  • Phase 1: 22 young people aged (14-17): total project funding GBP19,500.

  • Phase 2: 30 young people aged (10-12): total project funding GBP34,500.

4. Details of the impact

for Dyfed-Powys, from April 2018, the screening tool was further adopted for use with all referrals to the Youth Justice Service (YJS) across the Dyfed-Powys force area - Pembrokeshire, Carmarthen, Powys and Ceredigion [5.1; 5.2] - to ensure: a) a valid screening process for referrals as identified through HM Probation Youth Offending Team (YOT) inspections, and b) a standardised force-wide process to facilitate data sharing and research. The risk-assessment tool informs decision making on the most appropriate level of involvement following referrals to the YJS and is able to screen out approximately 35% of the entire case load referred to CYJPS, depending on whether an individual is identified as either a low-risk, or high-risk young offender [5.3; 3.2].

The key beneficiaries are threefold. Firstly, adopting a ‘Child First’ approach has been applied towards Young People in Ceredigion and Dyfed-Powys reducing the stigmatisation/ labelling of the young people referred to the service; this further reduces the chances of later offending for these low-risk offenders. The number of referrals in Ceredigion was reduced by approximately 30% in terms of total case load. The Head of CYJPS confirms:

The development of the Ceredigion Youth Screening Tool (CYSTEM) has been a major driver of change in the way in which we assess and process young people referred to the service. CYSTEM has allowed us to focus resources on the most critical individuals and avoid stigmatizing the very low risk cases; figures show that this has had an impact on the number of young people re-entering the system over the past two years. [5.1]

Secondly, staff working in Youth Justice saved time and financial resources , which enabled more efficient allocation of intervention work such as group work, sports-based interventions, one-to-one supervision, and substance misuse programmes. Using CYSTEM for a third of cases saves between three and five hours per referral and between approximately 150 and 200 hours per year, per caseworker. Not having to formally assess very low risk young offenders has significantly reduced demand for resources and freed up case workers’ time to provide intervention work with the high-risk category. The Head of CYJPS confirms:

The tool has changed the practices of referrals by screening out low risk individuals and has since been adopted across the four Dyfed-Powys force areas. Beyond the benefits realized by the young people, CYSTEM has saved hundreds of hours in staff time and released vital resources for important work in the community. [5.1]

Thirdly, the wider public benefited through crime reduction, by enabling resources to be targeted at medium to high risk offenders, the group which have been demonstrated in showing the greatest improvement from high quality intervention work, as identified by a Home Office SOC Policy Advisor in relation to the SOC Evaluation reports [3.4; 3.5]: ‘[t]he evaluations demonstrate a positive impact on the lives of these young people…that demonstrate how to change the life trajectories of many very vulnerable young people’ [5.4].

The UK Minister for National Security and Economic Crime referred to the Ceredigion SOC-2 project at a briefing for the Association of Police and Crime Commissioners (APCC), 9 May 2019 [5.4]. The briefing, interventions project, and Dr Norris’ evaluation work were also cited in a Home Office press release, 13 May 2019:

A project that the Home Office and Ceredigion Youth Justice and Prevention Service funds is helping around 30 young people by giving them an opportunity to recognise the consequences of becoming involved in serious and organised crime, and to learn to recognise high risk situations and practice ways of responding. [5.5]

The work also featured in the Home Office SOC Local Partnerships Bulletin in August 2019 [5.6]. The SOC project was nominated for a Howard League Community Award in 2018 and 2019 [5.7].

For the Head of CYJPS: ‘Dr Norris' evaluations for the two Home Office projects have been pivotal in furthering our understanding of the way in which Serious and Organized Crime (SOC) manifests itself amongst the most vulnerable young people in Ceredigion’ [5.1]. As such, the Dyfed-Powys PCC has awarded funding for the CJYPS to continue using the intervention work utilised within these projects [5.2]. Dr Norris has an on-going role in the design and evaluation of this continuation of the SOC project though funding secured from the Serious Youth Violence fund, delivering targeted interventions based on CYSTEM profiles [5.1; 5.2]. Approximately 100 young people have been provided opportunities through these targeted interventions. (Project on-hold due to Covid-19).

The approach advocated by Ceredigion Prevention Services is being formalised as a model for Welsh Government providing a template for youth justice practice across Wales [5.8.a]. Following the success of the Ceredigion model, the Youth Justice Board (YJB) awarded GBP30,000 in funding to formalise the approach into a proposed model for Youth Justice across Wales. Dr Norris will be a consultant in this project and deliver a revised version of CYSTEM [5.8.b; 5.8.c)]. (Delayed due to Covid-19).

As a continuation of Dr Norris’ work within Youth Justice, he has also informed the Home Office’s development and testing of a UK Prevent Intervention Toolkit aimed at practitioners working with people at risk of, or involved in, SOC [5.9]. A Home Office Policy Officer confirms, ‘Dr Norris provided expert input in relation to delivering programmes with young people, vulnerability and assessment of risk. We are grateful for his time, case studies and documents he provided on the CYSTEM screening tool and the SOC checklist used in the Ceredigion interventions, elements of which were cited in the toolkit [5.9]. Dr Norris also contributed to South Wales Police Violence and Vulnerability Unit’s work, developing a strategic framework for tackling serious violence in Wales [5.10].

A “SOC Workbook” was developed for use by YOT’s and ancillary organisations for SOC intervention work [5.11]. The workbook includes material on risk-assessment, including CYSTEM and a SOC Checklist developed by Norris, and is used in the on-going SOC preventions work funded by the PCC. A dedicated ‘Preventions’ web-portal hosts the workbook, project details and information on local and national preventions work [5.11].

Dr Norris was also invited to work as a consultant with the Home Office ‘Prevent’ programme to design and deliver educational programmes for young people as part of a three-year intervention on SOC in Albania [5.12]. A Home Office Policy Advisor confirms: `The work has provided the Home Office with a valuable insight into the nature of SOC vulnerability…which will be used further afield as part of the Prevent programme in the UK as well as for our work on Prevent upstream programme internationally’ [5.4].

5. Sources to corroborate the impact

5.1 Email and Letter, Head of Ceredigion Youth Justice, 19 July 2019.

5.2 Letter, Police and Crime Commissioner Dyfed-Powys, 8 February 2021.

5.3 Final report, Ceredigion Youth Justice Screening Tool evaluation project, 20 July 2016.

5.4 Email and Letter, Policy Advisor, Serious and Organised Crime Prevent, Home Office, 24 July 2019.

5.5 Press Release, Security Minister launches SOC strategy in Wales, Advance magazine,13 May 2019. Available at: www.adsadvance.co.uk/security-minister-launches-soc-strategy-in-wales.html

5.6 HM Government, SOC Local Partnerships Bulletin August 2019 Issue 11. See p.8 Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/842079/6.5900_HO_SOC_Local_Partnerships_Bulletin_issue_11_v6_WEB2.pdf

5.7 The Howard League for Penal Reform Community Awards 2019 and 2018 Shortlisted Projects. Available at: https://howardleague.org/community-awards/2018-community-awards-shortlisted-projects/;

https://howardleague.org/wp\-content/uploads/2019/09/shortlisted\-projects\-2019.pdf

5.8 a) Email, Head of Ceredigion Youth Justice, 7 January 2020; b) Email, Head Ceredigion Youth Justice, 25 August 2020; c)YOT Targeted Prevention-Wales-Pathfinder

5.9 Email and Letter, Lead Officer, Serious and Organised Crime Prevent Team, Home Office, 15 August 2019.

5.10 Email, Deputy Police Crime Commissioner, South Wales, 11 February 2019.

5.11 Preventions website, including SOC (Serious and Organised Crime) Workbook. Available at: www.preventions.co.uk, & SOC Workbook at www.preventions.co.uk >`Resources’ >`SOC’

5.12 Email, Officer, Serious Organised Crime Prevent Team, Home Office, 12 February 2020.

Submitting institution
Aberystwyth University / Prifysgol Aberystwyth
Unit of assessment
4 - Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience
Summary impact type
Societal
Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
No

1. Summary of the impact

Aberystwyth University’s Centre for Excellence in Rural Health Research (CERHR) informed the development of a new innovative telehealth service from 2014 which has delivered support to palliative care patients in Mid-West Wales. This is significant for the region as it supports the Health Board’s response to the recommendations set out on the Mid Wales Healthcare Study (Longley et al., 2014). Impact is evidenced by changes to the Health Board’s palliative care strategy ensuring the ongoing delivery of telehealth services; personal testimonials from patients evidencing improvement in wellbeing and daily functioning; and evidence of improving efficiency and access to services for staff and patients.

2. Underpinning research

From 2014, Aberystwyth University’s CERHR, led by Rahman, has examined the use of telemedicine to improve rural access to health services. Collaborating with Hywel Dda University Health Board’s Palliative Care Team a telehealth psychosocial support service for rural palliative care patients was established. Prior to the Covid-19 pandemic, telehealth was not part of routine service provision and this was one of the first UK services to provide home based support for palliative care patients in this way. The service used video conference software Polycom, and later trialled other platforms such as Skype for Business.

Embedded image Bronglais Hospital (marked ‘X’ on the adjacent map) services large areas of Hywel Dda (no.5 on the map), and the borders of Powys (no.6) and Bestsi Cadwaladr (no.2) Health Boards. With limited public transport and rural roads, patients often travel over an hour by car to attend appointments, with further full day trips to centres in Cardiff (no.3) or Swansea (no.7) for more specialised care. For patients (and their families) in receipt of palliative care and cancer treatments, this can pose significant financial, practical and emotional challenges. Psychosocial support as a component of palliative care is of critical importance (NICE; 2011, 2017). However, access to this service in Hywel Dda required additional travel to appointments or, in the case of chemotherapy patients and patients in neighbouring counties, no existing service was available.

Two phases of research utilised qualitative methods to examine patient and professional experiences of using the telehealth service:

**Using telehealth to provide psychosocial support for rural palliative care patients (between 2013 and 2016)

Patients received individual support, in the form of counselling and art therapy, from a specialist psychotherapist. Patients were interviewed monthly to understand their developing experience of accessing palliative care support using the technology. Health care professionals’ views about using telehealth for palliative care were also examined to better understand the barriers to routine telehealth service provision. The findings supported the service, with patients reporting increased empowerment, improved focus and reflection during sessions and the ability to build good rapport with the therapist [3.1].

**Telehealth to provide group psychosocial support for immunosuppressed patients in a rural setting (between 2015 and 2018)

Examined whether a similar positive experience could be achieved by linking multiple individuals to psychotherapists simultaneously, enabling professional and peer support in an economical way. The experiences of isolated immune-supressed patients (following chemotherapy) who participated in telehealth art therapy in groups of two to three over eight weeks were examined. Patients were interviewed at monthly intervals and similar positive outcomes were described. Some patients indicated they would not have engaged in face-to-face group therapy, but the remoteness of the telehealth service gave them confidence to participate and benefit from the support provided by the therapist and each other. The art therapist involved also experienced positive changes in their attitudes towards telehealth implementation [3.2; 3.3].

Hywel Dda UHB later commissioned Rahman to develop promotional videos outlining the availability of telehealth services to health professionals and patients . These are being used to ensure wider awareness of telehealth opportunities for patients and professionals during the Covid-19 pandemic [3.4; 3.5] and have been viewed a total of 698 times (patients’ film in English and Welsh). The current viewing figures for the internal staff video is unavailable due to Covid-19.

3. References to the research

  1. Rahman, R., Keenan, J., Hudson, J. 2020, ‘Exploring rural palliative care patients’ experiences of accessing psychosocial support through telehealth’: A longitudinal IPA study, Qu alitative Research in Medicine and Healthcare, 4(1): 31-42. DOI: 10.4081/qrmh.2020.8821

  2. Jones, G., Rahman, R., Robson, M. 2019, ‘Group art therapy and communication through technology’, in Malchiodi, C. A., (ed.), The Handbook of Art Therapy and Digital Technology, (London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers). ISBN-10: 1785927922

  3. Jones, G., Rahman, R., Robson, M. 2018, ‘Group art therapy using telemedicine technology for immunosuppressed patients undergoing chemotherapy’, in Wood, M., Jacobson, R., & Cridford, H., (eds.), Art therapy in hospice/palliative care and bereavement around the world (New York, USA: Routledge). DOI: 9781138087330

Associated research funding
  1. Marketing telehealth services in Hywel Dda: Hywel Dda Health Board: (1 April to 31 December 2018): Award GBP 4,295.10: Rahman (PI).
Dissemination material
  1. Telehealth marketing films for Hywel Dda UHB. Available:

https://hduhb.nhs.wales/healthcare/services-and-teams/art-therapy/;

https://biphdd.gig.cymru/gofal-iechyd/gwasanaethau-a-thimau/therapi-celf/ [Language: Welsh]

4. Details of the impact

Aberystwyth University informed the set-up and evaluation of a novel telehealth service offering psychosocial support to rural palliative care and cancer patients that was otherwise unavailable. Hywel Dda UHB services an estimated population of 384,000, it covers a quarter of the landmass of Wales and is the second most sparsely populated Welsh health board. There has been a steady rise in the number of patients recorded on its’ Primary Care Palliative Care Register with figures more than trebling between 2009 and 2019, from 517 to 1726 [5.1]. The telehealth service was provided in collaboration with the Palliative Care Team at Bronglais Hospital who delivered the psychosocial support.

The research demonstrates impact in three key ways:

Shaping policy, strategy and the implementation of telehealth for palliative care

The research influenced the Health Board’s telemedicine manager to recommend incorporating telehealth into the Health Board’s palliative care service. In 2015, this proposal was presented to, and supported by, Hywel Dda’s palliative care strategy group [5.2] and subsequently supported by the Committee who agreed to include telehealth as part of the Health Board’s strategy for service delivery [5.2]. The service continued with laptops provided by the project on long-term loan. In 2017, Hywel Dda UHB applied to and transferred some of its Integrated Care Fund allocation (GBP13,560) to purchase i-pads enabling the service to continue in a flexible way, and to commission AU to develop promotional films to market the service more widely to patients and staff [3.4; 5.3]. Subsequently, the use of telehealth was extended to other multidisciplinary team staff including, consultant services, nursing, occupational therapy, and to allied services (e.g., mental health services) with common patient cases [5.4]. The commissioned films are embedded on the Hywel Dda UHB website and were sent to Palliative Care Teams across the Health Board and health professionals involved in oncology and palliative care across Wales. They have been used by the Health Board to highlight as an example of an innovative community care treatment pathway with a view to encouraging wider patient and staff uptake during the Covid-19 pandemic [3.4].

Improving patients’ access to psychosocial support and supporting access to care closer to home

The telehealth service provided vital psychosocial support for palliative care and cancer patients and enabled convenient access to multidisciplinary staff; including, consultant led services, nursing, and occupational therapy. The Health Board’s General Manager for Primary and Community Care reports the telehealth project was ‘of great of benefit to patients, families, carers and staff working in rural Communities [5.5]. Frontline staff highlighted how telehealth can ‘enable patients … [to] … see each other […] and still feel part of a supportive group’ [5.6]. Patients reported how the service improved their ability to manage their daily lives and adapt to a terminal diagnosis, and minimised the need to miss appointments. The ability to access support from a familiar home environment supported good quality professional interactions and freedom of discussion through which patients felt their health professionals developed a holistic understanding of their needs [5.7; 5.8].

This service has been a vital part of my treatment… The introduction of the face time service has been amazing… This service… has enabled me to keep appointments that may have been missed due to my physical mobility problems and inability to travel. [5.7]

[S]ince the surgery I've obviously felt a lot more tired and physically as well initially I couldn't drive… So to do a session yesterday was good because … I sort of got up, had breakfast, did a few things and then did that… [telehealth consultation] … And then as soon as you sign off the rest of the day is your own. But if I'd gone to Aber it's pretty much the whole day really... [5.8]

Well, it's just nice to have somebody to talk to. I think the most important thing is it's nice to have someone that cares, what you think and how you're feeling which because obviously my family are all away, I don't have anyone to ask how I am or what you're feeling. Everybody is too busy. [5.8].

Well she might even know me more from doing it like that [telehealth] from face to face really… [S]o probably I've just disclosed or talked about more than I would have done in real life, really. [5.8]

Benefitting the working practices of healthcare staff

Research findings were presented and disseminated to the Welsh Gerontology Society in 2016 where 80% of attendees agreed that information about the telehealth research was of use to their clinical work [5.9]. Health board staff who used the telehealth service also saved travel-time which increased the efficiency of their clinical work [5.4; 5.10]. The service also improved staff access to patients, who were otherwise hard to reach either because of geography or psychological barriers [5.4; 5.10]. Additionally, the technology supported the inclusion and supervision of other psychotherapists working separately in other rural hospitals, enabling increased professional support, and inclusion within the multidisciplinary team [5.11]. Specialist Health Board staff using the service report explain:

This lady lives so far away that I might have been able to see her only once a month in person, now we are using the ipad I am able to contact her weekly, or more often if there is a need. [5.4]

This patient is a highly anxious lady … she’s very cautious about letting people into her own home and she can’t come to me, so to be able to communicate in this way it’s meant that I am available to her in ways that I wouldn’t have been able to because she sometimes doesn’t allow me into her home because of her anxiety levels.… [I]t’s made a big difference to her care [5.10].

Over the last six months I’ve been able to save just in terms of travel just over a thousand miles, and in hours something like five days. [5.4]

Because of geography in rural wales sometimes I’ve got to drive over an hour to see a patient and that isn’t always achievable by using the ipad it can mean I don’t have to travel 2-3 hours just to see one patient so I can make better use of my clinical time. [5.10]

Since Covid-19, the Palliative Care teams’ experience of, and ready access to telehealth equipment, meant that despite initial delays in setting up remote working for health board staff, the transition away from face-to-face clinics to remote support was able to happen seamlessly and rapidly for the Palliative Care team. The online service was able to facilitate pain management advice from consultants supporting specialist nurses in the community. It enabled therapies to continue with a non-verbal patient with multisystem atrophy where telephone consultation was not viable. It also supported staff wellbeing by enabling supervision and practical solutions during the transition [5.11].

Similarly, in response to the Covid-19 pandemic, a hospice charity, Hospice at Home Aberystwyth Volunteers, used the research findings to develop a new virtual strategy, securing National Lottery funding to develop a virtual hospice at home service for use during and beyond the pandemic [5.12]. This service will dovetail with the palliative care telehealth service to deliver an online suite of supportive therapies such as, counselling, art therapy, and relaxation sessions, whilst enabling befriending volunteers to maintain contact with their clients [5.12].

5. Sources to corroborate the impact

  1. Welsh Government, Statistics, Patients on Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) disease registers by local health board. Available at: https://statswales.gov.wales/Catalogue/Health-and-Social-Care/NHS-Primary-and-Community-Activity/GMS-Contract/patientsonqualityandoutcomesframework-by-localhealthboard-diseaseregister

  2. Emails, Hywel Dda UHB, staff, August 2015. [Language: English & Welsh]

  3. Email, Hywel Dda UHB, 31 January 2021; see also 3.4.

  4. Transcript and interviews for Hywel Dda UHB telehealth marketing films, between August and September 2019.

  5. Letter, General Manager Primary & Community Care Hywel Dda UHB, 17 December 2020.

  6. BBC article, Remote art therapy session for cancer patients, 11 June 2020. Available at: www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-53006595

  7. Email, Art Therapist, Hywel Dda UHB, 30 April 2019.

  8. Patient feedback between March and December 2014.

  9. Email, Conferences and Events Organiser, Welsh Gerontology Society, 1 June 2016.

  10. Editing cuts of individual interviews for Hywel Dda UHB telehealth marketing films, between August and September 2019.

  11. Letter and emails, Hywel Dda UHB staff, between November 2019 and October 2020.

  12. Letter, Trustee, Hospice at Home Aberystwyth Volunteers, 29 September 2020.

Showing impact case studies 1 to 2 of 2

Filter by higher education institution

UK regions
Select one or more of the following higher education institutions and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No higher education institutions found.
Institutions

Filter by unit of assessment

Main panels
Select one or more of the following units of assessment and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No unit of assessments found.
Units of assessment

Filter by continued case study

Select one or more of the following states and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.

Filter by summary impact type

Select one or more of the following summary impact types and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.

Filter by impact UK location

UK Countries
Select one or more of the following UK locations and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No UK locations found.
Impact UK locations

Filter by impact global location

Continents
Select one or more of the following global locations and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No global locations found.
Impact global locations

Filter by underpinning research subject

Subject areas
Select one or more of the following underpinning research subjects and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No subjects found.
Underpinning research subjects