Skip to main

Impact case study database

The impact case study database allows you to browse and search for impact case studies submitted to the REF 2021. Use the search and filters below to find the impact case studies you are looking for.

Search and filter

Filter by

  • Oxford Brookes University
   None selected
  • 12 - Engineering
   None selected
   None selected
   None selected
   None selected
   None selected
   None selected
Waiting for server
Download currently selected sections for currently selected case studies (spreadsheet) (generating)
Download currently selected case study PDFs (zip) (generating)
Download tags for the currently selected case studies (spreadsheet) (generating)
Currently displaying text from case study section
Showing impact case studies 1 to 3 of 3
Submitting institution
Oxford Brookes University
Unit of assessment
12 - Engineering
Summary impact type
Technological
Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
No

1. Summary of the impact

The Joining Technology Research Centre (JTRC) has provided substantial and critical knowledge transfer to YASA Limited (Oxford, UK), centred on the introduction of engineered polymer materials (EPMs) for reducing the weight of high-powered lightweight electric motors, designed and manufactured by YASA. Key achievements over two successful knowledge transfer partnerships (KPTs) included:

  • Improvement of the motor that enabled YASA to radically shorten production times, save material used and reduce defect rate, leading to significant cost reductions in motor production, and preparing the company for mass production.

  • Increased high-profile client base, through data driven assurance of motor performance, creation of assembly protocols, improved build robustness and reliability, and increased power demand potential of the motor.

  • Development of new joining processes (patented technology) to accommodate the introduction of EPMs. This led to investigations for alternative novel cooling mechanisms that drove key strategic decisions for future motor design.

  • Generation of predicative numerical tools to determine noise and vibration reductions for future motor development and diversification of motor applications, as a direct result of employing EPMs.

This all represented a huge step change for the company, leading to the successful mass production of subsequent YASA motor models, their take up in high-profile companies [text removed for publication] and signing multiple long-term development and supply agreements with automotive Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) customers, paving the way towards its inclusion in lower cost electric-driven production vehicles.

2. Underpinning research

The collaborative research and knowledge exchange between the Joining Technology Research Centre (JTRC) at Oxford Brookes University and YASA Motors involved three key technical strands: (1) adhesive development for dissimilar material joining; (2) novel heat exchange concepts; and (3) predictive dynamic modelling.

YASA, the Oxford based manufacturer of electric motors and motor controllers for use in automotive and industrial applications, was founded in 2009 by the CTO, Dr Tim Woolmer, to commercialise a permanent-magnet axial-flux electric motor (YASA stands for Yokeless and Segmented Armature). Having magnetic poles aligned axially enabled for a much narrower compact design that was also, and uniquely, liquid cooled. YASA electric motors typically are half the size and a third of the weight of conventional radial motors, including simpler manufacturing and integration processes. However, the construction of early prototypes was hand-built, slow and expensive to produce, with a high fail rate, which led to considerable inefficiencies. A critical aspect to the novel motor design and significant contributor to these reported issues was the fact that almost the entire assembly of the motor relied upon adhesive bonding.

Professor James Broughton’s (Head of JTRC) underpinning work on adhesive joint design [3.1], fatigue endurance [3.2] and durability test-rig development [3.3] were all directly applicable to tackling the above issues. YASA approached JTRC in 2011, due to their knowledge and expertise, and access to specific equipment for solving joining issues related to lightweight composite materials. Specifically, JTRC were contacted to help develop YASA’s in-house knowledge and capabilities related to adhesive technology, which led to the first KTP, entitled ‘Development of sustainable joining technologies for the mass manufacture of high reliability, high torque, low mass electric motors’ (KTP008367, 2011–2013, GBP106,890), funded by Technology Strategy Board (TSB, now Innovate UK).

Under the Principal Lead of Professor Allan Hutchinson, Head of Sustainable Vehicle Engineering Centre (SVEC), and supervision of Professor (then Dr) James Broughton, Head of JTRC, the partnership achieved several key objectives. These included: (i) new manufacturing process rules to reduce assembly errors; (ii) an improved bonding process that led to a reduction in potential defects (motor robustness); and (iii) a reduction in motor production times by implementing detailed design modifications that eliminated time-consuming and expensive rework. In turn, this contributed to a significant reduction in the cost of the motor [3.4]. For future high-volume production models, utilising lightweight ‘injection moulded’ engineered polymer materials (EPM) will lead to more sustainable motor designs with greater potential for recycling at end-of-life. Work was undertaken to investigate co-bonding of EPMs using laser and heat welding technologies, and their effects on bond performance and durability; many of these materials exhibit low surface energies, which can translate to poor adhesion if not treated. This work developed solutions involving co-bonding and over-moulding technique innovations and led to the filing of three patents. The outcomes of this work received significant national recognition as the award-winning KTP for Engineering Excellence and runner-up finalist in the Best of the Best Award, Innovate UK, 2014.

The introduction of EPMs, however, had negative consequences, including increased noise, vibration and poor heat extraction. A follow-on KTP project was formed, entitled ‘Development of a prototype axial flux motor using novel cooling technologies with the aim of providing a step change (30%) in power output’ (KTP009387, 2013–2015, GBP94,587), funded by TSB and under the joint supervision of Professor Broughton and Dr Stephen Samuel. Analytical models developed by Dr Samuel on heat transfer of IC engines [3.5] formed the basis for specialised models for optimising cooling and heat flow dynamics. One of the options explored was heat pipe technology (HPT) because of its simplicity and compactness. Experimentation evaluated various wick types and cooling fluid types to validate the models. The research delivered 12 technical reports on experimental, theoretical and numerical investigations into flow rates, coolant systems and fluids, wetting of wicks for heat pipes, and dynamics of heat flow [3.6]. Although the overall outcome established that HPT was not currently a viable option, the findings informed company strategy and diverted significant R&D resource to other areas. Preliminary frequency analyses also demonstrated limitations with the current aluminium cover of the YASA P400, leading to a sponsored PhD on the dynamics of certain motor components. This work immediately identified issues with the dynamic response of some motors and further issues that could arise with the introduction of EPMs for light-weighting purposes. This work continues to guide YASA’s implementation of EPMs and re-design of the motor to reduce noise levels and improve dynamic response.

3. References to the research

3.1 Fessel, G., Broughton, J., Fellows, N, Durodola, J., Hutchinson, A. (2007). Evaluation of different lap-shear joint geometries for automotive applications. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 27(7), 574-583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2006.09.016

3.2 Hooper, M., Hutchinson, A., Broughton, J., Taylor, M. (2012). Development of a novel test rig for the evaluation of aircraft fuel tank sealant. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 40(1), 177-183. https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE103420

3.3 Fessel, G., Broughton, J., Fellows, N., Durodola, F, Hutchinson, (2009). Fatigue performance of metallic reverse-bent joints. Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures, 32(9), 704-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2695.2009.01378.x

3.4 *KTP008367 Partners final report (KTP1)

3.5 Otero, V.T. and Samuel, S. (2018). Numerical Simulation of a 2018 F1 Car Cooling System for Silverstone Circuit. SAE Technical Paper 2018-01-0169 https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-01-0169

3.6 *Samuel, S. and Goh, S. (2015). Cooling System for Electrical Motors and Generator, YASA Engineering Report, Documents 674, 695, 735, 817, 936, 943, 950, 959, 960, 1011, 1012, & 1052

*can be supplied on request by Oxford Brookes University’s Research, Business & Development Office

4. Details of the impact

The Joining Technology Research Centre at Oxford Brookes University has been the source of invaluable expertise for YASA Motors. Two successful KTPs led to a significant increase in the technical and commercial capabilities of YASA and further contribution towards a lower carbon economy.

Currently, most of YASAs production of motors and controllers resides in the automotive sector, enabling automotive manufacturers to meet increasingly stringent emissions targets whilst delivering exciting driving experiences. In addition to automotive applications, YASA motors are used in defence, marine and aerospace sectors where high power density and torque density are critical. All these markets demand highly reliable, lightweight and robust motors, given the extreme environments these types of vehicles operate within. In 2018, YASA officially opened its 100,000 unit motor production facility. The Business Secretary, Greg Clark MP, who delivered the opening address said, “ YASA is a brilliant example of what can be achieved when government, academia and industry come together to turn the best ideas from the best minds into scale-up companies[5.1]. YASA is now well-placed to capture significant market share within these sectors too and a significant aspect of this is down to the robust bonding technologies and company knowledge gained through the unique, on-going, relationship fostered between Oxford Brookes University and YASA.

Initially, the partnership was sought to provide the capability to make high torque, low mass motors using injection moulding polymers with adhesive/composite bonds. Prior to the KTP project with JTRC, YASA lacked adhesive joining expertise, particularly relating to the design of interfaces and bonding of composite parts to proposed low surface energy polymers, as well as expertise in choosing or designing test methods suitable for testing such bonds against environmental and mechanical stresses, all needed for scaling to mass manufacture [5.5].

With the first KTP focused primarily on production issues, there have been several significant impacts on the business. Dr Tim Woolmer, Founder and CTO, YASA Limited remarked, “ The combination of expertise and equipment had attracted us to the KTP – but everyone here has been blown away by the results[5.2]. These main technological impacts were first introduced in 2013, where the company at the time recorded a revenue of GBP1,600,000. Issues directly linked to the bonding process were resolved, which meant defect-rates had fallen by a factor of 100, saving almost GBP100,000 in avoidance of motor durability failures. The KTP Associate Jonny Biddulph conducted trials of new technology on injection moulded stator plates, where the outcome was a part-cost reduced from GBP177 to GBP7. With two of these parts included in every motor this represented a significant saving (GBP1,140,000 for 3,000 motors) and allowed the joining of neighbouring parts by laser welding, further increasing manufacturing speed. The manufacturing process time reduced from 7 days to 2 days, potentially saving GBP16,650,000 (reduced assembly time savings GBP18.50/hour production cost, based on predicted 90,000hours saved three years after completion of KTP) [5.3]. From Oxford Brookes University’s first involvement with YASA in 2011, the company grew from 12 to ~150 employees in 2020, with a recorded revenue of GBP7,600,000 in 2018 [5.4]. This growth has been necessary to extend production rates from less than 50 motors per annum to a high volume capability of 100,000 units per annum [5.1]. This capability would not be possible without the key technology to deliver high-volume over-moulded bonded stator plates.

This KTP has subsequently proven instrumental to sustaining the growth of YASA Motors in the areas of materials and bonding technologies. On the back of demonstrating robust bonding procedures, the motors were adopted for the Jaguar C-X75 supercar, dubbed ‘ the most technologically advanced road car ever conceived’, and on the strength of this YASA were shortlisted for the Society of Motor Manufactures and Traders (SMMT) Award for Automotive Innovation [5.6]. Other high-end sports cars have since adopted the technology, proving its capabilities in demanding environments. For example, the [text removed for publication] uses three YASA motors and, according to [text removed for publication], delivers the fastest accelerating, most powerful production car ever. [text removed for publication] commented: “ YASA’s motors are extremely power dense, making them the key-ingredient for the direct drive system. The torque capability of the YASA motors combined with our world-leading engineering expertise has given the [text removed for publication] an acceleration capability that is second to none[5.7]. [text removed for publication], like many other OEMs are now also heavily investing in hybrid and electric vehicles, and have integrated seven P400 motors in their new [text removed for publication] supercar [5.8]. YASA electric motors also power [text removed for publication] first hybrid series production sports car, the [text removed for publication]. YASA have been working closely with [text removed for publication], developing a custom version of its electric motor that meets [text removed for publication] demanding performance specifications. The [text removed for publication] was launched by [text removed for publication] on 29 May 2019, in [text removed for publication] [5.9]. Such projects are often the proving grounds for the adoption of new technologies into more mainstream vehicles.

As a direct result of the KTP and the strategy to develop high volume production motors, three key international patents were filed by YASA and the Oxford Brookes University KTP research assistant. Patent EP3044854: Stator Plate Over-moulding (2014) involved placing a resin membrane into a mould of an injection-moulding machine and injection moulding a set of reinforcing features onto the membrane using a bondable thermoplastic polymer [5.10]. Patent EP3044849: Pole Piece Bonding (2014) uses similar technology for bonding the pole pieces using a flexible resin membrane. The resin membrane, which may contain woven glass fibre reinforcement, may be an engineering polymer material (e.g. PPA, PEEK, PPS, ABS, PA) wherein reinforcement inhibits the stator bars from pushing through the membrane. An additional thermoplastic polymer resin is used for supplementary bonding injection moulded reinforcing features [5.11]. Due to the high rotational rotor speeds that generate large centripetal forces on the rotor stages, particularly on surface mounted magnets, any loss of magnet adhesion is a risk for this motor topology. In order to combat this issue a third Patent, EP2773023: Axial Flux Motor (2013), was filed. It introduced a composite rotor for the axial flux motor, wherein the rotor holds permanent magnets circumferentially spaced around the rotor. An over-winding of strands of reinforcement material are toroidally-wound over the rotor and magnets. The strands help strengthen the rotor and provide a lightweight and high performance product [5.12]. Together, the technology behind these patents helped deliver the third generation P400 motors.

The technical transition towards the launch of the P400 R from earlier models is consistent with the dramatic increase in demand for low carbon emission technologies, driven by legislation and motivated by climate change. The P400 R Series is now manufactured using advanced materials and proprietary construction techniques that enable high-volume production with significant customer cost benefits. An important innovation of the P400 R Series is the use of an engineering polymer housing for the motor stator, in place of the aluminium housing used in earlier models. The performance of engineered polymer material is strong, highly durable and lightweight, and is already in common use in volume automotive applications (not motors). Importantly, the materials used in the P400 R Series reduce both material cost and assembly time, the direct legacy of the first KTP. The low weight of the new polymer housing also helps to improve the overall motor performance [5.13]. Lightweighting also has secondary benefits that include reduced wear on components, reduced maintenance and an extension of service life.

Oxford Brookes University’s contribution to the development of these electric motors for mass production puts UK industry at a significant advantage to deliver on Government targets for total electrification of transport by 2050. An example of the broader reach of this technology includes the application of electric motors in the [text removed for publication] hovercraft, as bow thrusters to provide reversible sideways thrust for craft manoeuvring at low speed. With minimal modification, two YASA P400 motors were incorporated into the design of the hovercraft. The principal benefit of using YASA electric motors was that two of the four diesel engines could be eliminated from the design. This reduced the noise levels from the engines significantly, without adversely affecting the reliability of the craft [5.14]. Likewise, [text removed for publication] has completed testing of the ground-breaking technology that will power the world’s fastest all-electric plane. The plane is part of a [text removed for publication] initiative called ACCEL, short for ‘Accelerating the Electrification of Flight’. The ACCEL project team includes YASA as key partners along with the aviation start-up Electroflight [5.15].

The knowledge gained from the underpinning work with OBU to enable lightweight EPMs to be used effectively, has greatly assisted YASA to supply motors to production electric vehicles, owned by mainstream OEMs [5.16]. OEMs that have been associated with YASA products include [text removed for publication] [5.1]. Without robust assembly technologies and the ability to bond a multitude of different lightweight materials, the YASA motor could not supply a volume production unit of the highest quality demanded by OEMs. Indeed, without high quality bonding methods and procedures, the motor could not deliver on the performance required for today’s transport requirements, let alone meet the future global transportation needs.

5. Sources to corroborate the impact

5.1 YASA (2018, February 1). YASA opens new 100,000 unit Oxford production facility [ Press release]

5.2 Tim Woolmer (CTO YASA) – in conversation [available here, 1:08m to 1:36m]

5.3 Innovate UK TSB, Best of the Best 2014, Awards Brochure. YASA and Oxford Brookes University ‘Best Partnership Award – Finalists’ (page 4) and Engineering Excellence Award Winner (page 10) [available here]

5.4 Craft Financials & Metrics [available here]

5.5 Contact: Tim Woolmer, CTO and Founder, YASA Motors

5.6 SMMT (2013, November 13). Auto industry gears up for innovation award [ News]

5.7 YASA (2015, March 6). YASA powers record breaking hypercar [ Press release]

5.8 [text removed for publication]

5.9 [text removed for publication]

5.10 EP3044854: Stator Plate Over-moulding, 2014

5.11 EP3044849: Pole-Piece Bonding, 2014

5.12 EP2773023: Axial Flux Motor, 2013

5.13 YASA (2015, September 15). YASA P400 Series Launch [ Press release]

5.14 YASA (2016, April 18). First flight of new hovercraft [ Press release]

5.15 [text removed for publication]

5.16 YASA (2019, February 18). YASA Signs Innovation Agreement with Global Automotive Manufacturer [ Press release]

Submitting institution
Oxford Brookes University
Unit of assessment
12 - Engineering
Summary impact type
Technological
Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
No

1. Summary of the impact

Exposure to small particulate matter (PM) emitted by engines causes more than 4 million premature deaths worldwide every year. Modern gasoline direct injection (GDI) engines are used in road transportation and are particularly problematic because they produce large numbers of ultra-fine particles. New EU regulations strictly limiting PM emissions mean traditional engine manufacturers must now find ways to reduce them, and in turn reduce the global health risk.

The Engine Modelling Team (EMT) at Oxford Brookes University (OBU) has developed new knowledge about the way soot forms in GDI engines, along with novel 3D computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models of these engines. These have led to a shift in practice for one global engine manufacturer and the supporting industry. By proving the concept of ‘Limiting Temperatures for the Retainment of Liquid Film’ and innovative technical solutions, the EMT have enabled Ford Motor Company to appreciate the full extent to which fuel puddling over the piston crown affects soot generation, leading the company to investigate new piston technologies and control approaches. The EMT also developed the most accurate GDI engine modelling framework available through commercial engine modelling software platforms. Major companies Siemens DISW and Ricardo Software are now embedding this framework into their software releases.

2. Underpinning research

The growth of digital engineering is a priority, according to the latest UK Automotive Council roadmaps (2017). This is to reduce the need for hardware testing, and instead use multi-physics software simulation tools. Since 2014 the EMT at OBU, led by Dr Fabrizio Bonatesta, has been collaborating with the Ford Motor Company, Siemens DISW (formerly CD-adapco) and more recently Ricardo Software to support the further growth of modelling tools for the automotive industry. They have concentrated on developing models for the simulation of GDI engines within industry-standard Computer-Assisted Engineering (CAE) software environments [R1 to R4], with a primary focus on improving understanding of the mechanisms leading to PM formation [R1 to R6].

DynAMO (dynamic analysis modelling and optimisation of GDI engines) is a Ford-led collaborative R&D project involving OBU, Loughborough University, Bath University, Sheffield University, Siemens DISW, Ricardo, STFC Hartree Centre, Cambustion and HSSMI, co-sponsored by Advanced Propulsion Centre – APC6 Call (TSB Ref. 78938-506185, GBP11,026,753, 2017–2021, total project cost: GBP22,000,000 – 50% industry funded). As part of the first phase of the DynAMO project (2017–2019), the OBU team focused on CFD model development [R3, R4]. They proposed novel approaches for the calibration of spray and combustion models, based on design of experiment (DoE) and multi-objective optimisation techniques. They also proposed a new robust methodology to accurately model liquid film formation and evolution across wide ranges of engine operating conditions.

Nano-size particles are liable to form in large quantities especially during engine warm-up and transient operation (such as acceleration). The EMT work has shown that pooling of liquid within the combustion chamber is responsible for the emission of nano-size carbon particles in these phases. It also identified the cylinder wall/piston temperature as the factor most likely to lead to the build-up of liquid fuel ‘film’ in small-capacity spray-guided GDI engines operating in stoichiometric mode [R4].

The OBU team used sophisticated spray, surrogate fuel and heat transfer models to establish how the piston surface temperature affects the spray-to-wall impingement and evaporation regimes. These result in variable levels of liquid film being present at the beginning of the combustion process. The modelling has shown that under mid to high engine load, with common gasoline fuel, surface temperatures above 230°C ensure there is little liquid film before combustion. However, the practice of piston cooling, operated through Piston Cooling Jets (PCJ) with the sole concern of material safety, may prevent the piston surface from operating at or above this safe temperature threshold.

The OBU team introduced the concept of ‘Limiting Temperatures for the Retainment of Liquid Film’ [R4], which also explains the surge in particle number (PN) emissions typically seen while operating a modern GDI engine in transient mode – for example during acceleration. Due to the relatively long thermal transient of the piston top surface, a sudden increase in engine load can result in piston temperatures being too low, leading to large deposits of liquid film. In turn, the burning of this liquid (pool-fire) generates vast PN emissions. Model validation laboratory tests, instigated by the OBU results, have shown how even relatively small reductions in piston temperature of 30–40°C, as a result of PCJ activation, lead to increases in PN of up to four orders of magnitude.

The figure below shows the influence of PCJ activation, at an engine speed of 2500 rpm and a torque of 50 Nm. As shown by the OBU modelled liquid film profiles and corresponding images at spark timing, PCJ activation decreases piston surface temperature by about 30–40°C, generating large puddles of liquid in the spray-to-wall impact regions. The DynAMO project also acquired borescope images, which show vast luminescent regions indicating pool-fire and diffusive flames towards the end of combustion. In this case, PN emissions increase by approximately three orders of magnitude. The effects of a sudden acceleration (sudden increase of engine load) are very similar.

Embedded image

Parallel project work carried out in collaboration with Ricardo Software, at a later stage of the DynAMO project, concentrated on improving a number of fundamental models for incorporation into Ricardo’s 0D/1D engine modelling platform WAVE. A new advanced turbulence model, which more accurately reflects the in-cylinder flow characteristics of a modern GDI engine, was integrated into their newly released spark-ignition (SI) predictive combustion model. Software environment work was also carried out by the OBU team, expanding the platform receptivity for the integration of the novel PN functional models under development at OBU.

3. References to the research

1. Sciortino, D. D., Bonatesta, F., Hopkins, E., Yang, C., Morrey, D., A Combined Experimental and Computational Fluid Dynamics Investigation of Particulate Matter Emissions from a Wall-Guided Gasoline Direct Injection Engine, Energies, 10(9), 1408, 2017. DOI: 10.3390/en10091408

2. Tan, J. Y., Bonatesta, F., Ng, H. K., Gan, S., Numerical Investigation of Particulate Matter Processes in Gasoline Direct Injection Engines through Integrated Computational Fluid Dynamics–Chemical Kinetic Modeling, Energy & Fuels, ACS, 2020. DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b03945

**3. Biagiotti, F., Bonatesta, F. et al. Modelling Liquid Film in Modern GDI Engines and the impact on Particulate Matter Emissions – Part 1. Article draft at December 2020, it has been submitted to International Journal of Engine Research at the time of writing.

**4. Bonatesta, F. et al. Confidential DYNAMO Project Reports for Quarter 7, May 2019, Slides 20-25.

5. Bonatesta, F., Chiappetta, E., La Rocca, A., Part-Load Particulate Matter from a GDI Engine and the Connection with Combustion Characteristics, Applied Energy, Elsevier, 124: 366–376, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.03.030

6. Bokor, C., Rohani, B., Humphries, C., Morrey, D., Bonatesta, F. Investigating the Impact of Gasoline Composition on PN in GDI Engines Using an Improved Measurement Method, International Journal of Engine Research, 2020. DOI: 10.1177/1468087420970374

*can be supplied by OBU Research Business & Development Office on request.

4. Details of the impact

In 2016 the World Health Organization (WHO) estimated that more than 4 million people die prematurely every year as a result of exposure to PM. Road transportation is responsible for the release of up to 20% of atmospheric carbon matter, or soot. Modern GDI engines are especially problematic because they produce large numbers of ultra-fine particles.

Soot formation in GDI engines is normally associated with imperfect mixing between air and fuel, and with liquid film of fuel being deposited on piston and cylinder walls during fuel injection. Exhaust filters are currently used by most manufacturers to comply with EU6b and US emission regulations. However, the most dangerous particles with a size of less than 23 Nm are not currently regulated, and cannot be removed effectively by filtration. As the forthcoming EU7 regulations will impose much stricter limits on PN emissions, for the GDI engine to remain viable for use in passenger vehicles, improved understanding and disruptive solutions are essential.

The impact generated by the OBU team as part of the DynAMO project has four main strands:

  • It has fundamentally transformed Ford’s knowledge around the mechanisms of PM formation and the link with limiting piston temperatures. This is playing a significant part in Ford’s planning to comply with the new, stricter emission regulations.

  • It has enabled Ford to begin the shift to less costly digital engineering tools (to replace hardware testing), as part of future engine development.

  • It is enabling Siemens DISW, another DynAMO partner, to integrate the 3D CFD modelling approaches developed by OBU into beta versions of its market-leading software, STAR-CD and STAR-CCM+.

  • It is enabling Ricardo, another DynAMO partner, to integrate significantly improved turbulence and combustion models into its 0D/1D WAVE software, and these are planned for release as future add-ons/options.

Ford had a market share of automotive sales of approximately 14% worldwide and 10% in the UK in 2019. New knowledge and tools being established and embedded within the engineering teams on the Ford UK, Dunton Campus (and extended to Ford North America) are key to Ford’s future economic, environmental and societal impact, globally. This is as a direct result of OBU’s CFD modelling work.

Ford’s technical expert for the DynAMO project explains in a support letter how the OBU modelling work has ‘completely revolutionised’ the understanding of particulate formation mechanisms within Ford. The theory advanced by OBU ‘was a revelation … For the first time I could appreciate how … to explain transient PN behaviour’. Importantly, ‘this new knowledge may assist Ford, and other automotive OEMs, to comply with the increasingly stringent legal PN emission regulations, ensuring the sustainability of GDI engine technology, even in hybrid applications’ [S1]. A key factor in this is understanding the need to maintain high-enough piston temperatures at all stages of vehicle operation, which could ensure compliance with EU6 limits (6.0E+11 particle/km), and possibly beyond, without the use of costly filtering devices.

A further support letter produced by Ford echoes the first one, confirming current as well as future impacts generated by the OBU work, in terms of new understanding and development opportunities: ‘The concepts and theories proposed by OBU have effectively changed the perception of these issues [the mechanisms of PM formation, and the influence of piston temperature on liquid film formation] within the Ford Technical Team, and open new areas of opportunity, including new piston design and novel calibration approaches such as the piston cooling strategy, which directly consider the trade-off between component durability and PM emissions [S2]. The OBU team proposed a dual-fuel engine simulation that offers unprecedented accuracy. This enables reliable prediction of fuel distribution and liquid film, and how these start forming soot during combustion. The Ford support letter remarks on how the OBU work is contributing to the present shift in practice within the organisation, which is the second strand of impact claimed in this case study: ‘The modelling work carried out by the team at OBU has been … impactful to Ford especially. Compared to common approaches … at Ford, the OBU modelling framework offers increased robustness, accuracy and functionality, and as such will assist the gradual but necessary transition … to cost-effective digital engineering … The tools are being established … within the engineering teams on the Ford Dunton UK Campus and extended to Ford North America, where development of new gasoline and hybrid powertrain platforms will continue to be strong for the foreseeable future’ [S2].

A further strand of OBU’s impact relates to development by Siemens DISW, another DynAMO partner, which has a major share in the 3D CFD engine modelling market. Siemens will be rolling out the novel modelling framework to the wider CFD user community. The director of powertrain at Siemens DISW gives evidence of the OBU impact, which improved both understanding and practice within the organisation: ‘To my knowledge, this is the most accurate GDI engine modelling framework available through a commercial CFD software platform. The methodologies proposed … are also of high significance to Siemens DISW because OBU unveiled shortcomings in the current offered … approach, which now Siemens DISW is addressing. The novel … methodologies will feed into future releases of … STAR-CD … and also support the new platform Simcenter STAR-CCM+ in-cylinder solution’ [S3]. The OBU work has so far directly contributed to three releases of the STAR-CD software, which now offers a direct calculation of engine charge homogeneity, improved numerical stability for the modelling of liquid film and improved calculations of PM characteristics. The DynAMO project also provided experimental data, acquired for, processed and validated through the OBU models, and this is acknowledged in a Siemens blog describing its latest release of in-cylinder combustion modelling in STAR-CCM+ [S5].

The models developed by OBU will be further integrated into the 0D-1D Ricardo WAVE platform. This has even more users than engine CFD software, which is mostly used by specialist departments. Ricardo’s technology manager (software) gives a clear indication of the impact of this work on the Ricardo organisation, through the release of add-ons for future software and therefore the ability to more accurately model the generation of PN emissions: ‘Oxford Brookes … have been able to identify flaws in the initial 0D turbulence model implementation … and validate the improved combustion model … The OBU team have proven to have a unique blend of excellent capability with relevant experience and the results of this work will be feeding into future releases of Ricardo WAVE via add-ons and best practice guidelines’ [S4].

Ford’s confidence in the direction indicated by OBU’s work also led to it investing £100,000 to significantly enhance the engine testing capabilities at OBU. OBU’s specific contribution to the DynAMO project has been fundamental in enabling one of the world’s biggest engine manufacturers to begin to successfully address the challenge of reducing PM in line with new EU regulations. It has also enabled leading software companies to create new products that may be transformative for their businesses. This paves the way for reducing the major health risk associated with PM in the future.

5. Sources to corroborate the impact

1. Evidence Letter from Mark Cary, former Technical Specialist, Ford Motor Company UK

2. Evidence Letter from Dennis Witt, Supervisor, UK Innovation & Outreach, Ford Motor Company

3. Evidence Letter from Robert Norris, Software Development Manager, Ricardo UK

4. Evidence Letter from Warren Seeley, Director – Powertrain, Siemens Digital Industries Software

5. Siemens, ‘Simcenter STAR-CCM+ 2019.3: Simulate In-Cylinder Combustion’, October 2019, https://blogs.sw.siemens.com/simcenter/simcenter\-star\-ccm\-2019\-3\-simulate\-in\-cylinder\-combustion/

Submitting institution
Oxford Brookes University
Unit of assessment
12 - Engineering
Summary impact type
Technological
Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
No

1. Summary of the impact

The need for more sustainable transport solutions has never been more pressing. Enabling the shift to electric vehicles globally requires both innovative engineering, and detailed understanding of driver expectations and behaviours. Multi-disciplinary research at Oxford Brookes University’s Sustainable Vehicle Engineering Centre (SVEC) since 2004 has uniquely addressed the economic, technical, social and environmental aspects of electric vehicles and personal mobility. Through collaborations with the industry, local government and public-private partnerships, SVEC has had impact in two distinct areas:

  • Substantial commercial gain for a major automotive manufacturer, BMW, who used SVEC’s research to inform the technical development of their electric cars, and benefitted from guidance on building wider acceptance of electric vehicles in their markets globally.

  • Influencing UK transport policy on electric vehicle adoption as a result of trials, and influencing policy on powered light vehicles through collaboration with the Low Carbon Vehicle Partnership.

2. Underpinning research

For individual transport to become more sustainable it must become smaller, lighter, energy-efficient, recyclable and use renewable energy sources. Future light duty vehicles (cars and vans) must use fewer primary material resources. Since launching the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)-funded *DRIVENet: Network for the design for dismantling, reuse & recycling in road vehicles in 2004 (GR/S87577/01, 2004–2007, PI: Hutchinson), Oxford Brookes University’s (OBU) Sustainable Vehicle Engineering Centre (SVEC) has produced world-leading research on energy, emissions and materials resource challenges facing the international automotive industry. This has included important work on: lightweight vehicles that could be designed for dismantling and materials recovery; electric powertrains and battery technologies whose component parts can be recycled; and vehicles with a reduced use phase energy consumption that is derived from renewable energy sources.

Further, electric transport is inextricably linked to the electricity grid, both in terms of direct energy use and energy storage in vehicle batteries that can be used to deliver energy into the grid during times of peak demand. A thorough understanding and modelling of this new energy and transport nexus was required to deliver a new robust, low carbon approach.

SVEC’s research in electric vehicle (EV) introduction and e-mobility provides a fundamental and detailed understanding of these energy requirements through unique modelling and analysis [3.1]. SVEC created a new methodology for sustainable vehicle design, to enable detailed evaluation of the whole life energy and economic implications of combining different forms of powertrain, components, materials, processes and recycling techniques [3.2]. This was achieved by combining database information with detailed Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) models in a multi-partner EPSRC-funded project entitled Towards Affordable, Closed Loop Recyclable Future Low Carbon Vehicle Structures (TARF-LCV) (EP/I038616/1, 2011–2016, Co-PI: Hutchinson) and incorporating whole lifecycle energy analyses with predictions of the market growth of electric and hybrid vehicles [3.3].

As a long-standing collaborator with OBU, BMW Group chose SVEC in 2009 to lead the technical and psychological research elements of the flagship Technology Strategy Board (TSB)-supported MINI E project in the UK (TP11/LCV/6/I/BF045J, GBP3,360,724 plus up to 50% contribution from industry, 2009-2011, PI: Hutchinson). The project included electric vehicle trials in Oxfordshire as part of Project i (BMW’s holistic approach to future personal transport). Project partners included Scottish and Southern Energy who supplied the home/public charging technology and electricity, Oxford City Council and Oxfordshire County Council who provided infrastructure support, and the South East England Development Agency (SEEDA) who brokered local partnerships to facilitate vehicle trials. Key deliverables of OBU were demographics of potential customers, an in-depth understanding of their mobility needs and an analysis of underlying motivations relating to the attractiveness of driving EVs. This involved two six-month trials of 40 vehicles (effectively ‘beta test’ MINI-Es) with 138 private and fleet drivers, combining objective data-logger information with subjective driver data. Data-loggers analyzed the energy drawn from the grid for both home and public charging, and the energy consumed directly by the cars. This determined the effects of temperature on battery performance during winter weather, the energy used by the vehicles’ ancillary systems, patterns of driver charging and locations of charging, charging efficiency and overall energy use.

SVEC was supported by OBU’s Department of Psychology who analysed the social and psychological aspects of driving electric cars through questionnaire design, diary development, focus groups and interviews with drivers to analyse attitudes and experiences over time. This enabled OBU to reveal critical factors underpinning customer motivation, covering initial attitudes, adaptation to new technologies and behavioural change. It became clear that what drives consumers is convenience, emphasizing the vital role that home-charging would play in the future uptake of EVs. Additionally, SVEC developed new business models for BMW to quantify the scale and market potential for EVs in the vital UK business fleet context [3.4]; this sector accounts for 60% of new UK sales and is therefore fundamental to understanding a viable business proposition. At BMW’s request, SVEC surveyed 10% of this market via BMW’s premium fleet customers and developed business models comprising volumes, market sectors, pricing stances and routes to market [3.5]. This confirmed the opportunity for new vehicle sales volumes.

3. References to the research

[3.1] Sweeting, WJ, Hutchinson, AR and Savage, SD (2011). ‘Factors affecting electric vehicle energy consumption’. Sustainable Engineering 4(3):192-201.

DOI: 10.1080/19397038.2011.592956

[3.2] Sweeting, WJ and Winfield, PH (2012). ‘Future transportation: Lifetime considerations and framework for sustainability assessment’, Energy Policy 51:927-938.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.09.055

[3.3] Raugei, M, Morrey, D, Hutchinson, AR and Winfield, PH (2015). ‘A coherent life cycle assessment of a range of light-weighting strategies for compact vehicles’, Cleaner Production 108 Part A:1168-1176. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.100

**[3.4] ‘New Business Model Opportunities: Potential for Electric Vehicles in the UK’. Confidential project report, MINI E Project UK, SVEC, Oxford Brookes University, April 2011.

**[3.5] ‘New Business Model Opportunities: UK Fleet Market Potential for Alternatively-Fuelled Vehicles’. Confidential project report, MINI E Project UK, SVEC, Oxford Brookes University, August 2011.

*can be supplied by OBU Research Business & Development Office on request

4. Details of the impact

Sustainable personal travel solutions for individuals, families and business are a critical element of future transport strategies in the UK and internationally. SVEC’s cross-sector, multi-disciplinary, research into the economic, technical, social and environmental aspects of electric vehicles, including battery pack manufacture and recycling, have had significant impact on automotive manufacturers and those planning future transport policy. As noted by Andrew Smith MP in 2015, Higher Education Innovation Fund support was used to set up the Sustainable Vehicle Engineering Centre at Oxford Brookes University: “That has been used by BMW and all the major automotive companies in the development of electric vehicles. The university has just launched an innovative new undergraduate degree in business and automotive management, in partnership with BMW. That is university innovation in the lead in a crucial national industry" [5.1].

Impact on development of the BMWi3 and general market acceptance of EVs

The MINI E project was designed by BMW Group as a path-breaking field trial in the early days of electro-mobility. It aimed to gain insights into real life usage and customer expectations of Electric Vehicles (EVs) prior to any vehicles coming to market. There were six trials in total across Europe, Asia and the USA, and SVEC was the lead scientific partner in its UK trials (2009-11). Oxford City was an early major beneficiary of the electric vehicle trials, with around 80 public charging points installed or planned around the city. In 2019, Head of Government Affairs, BMW Group (UK) wrote to Professor Hutchinson, Head of SVEC, confirming that the company “ highly value the output of the research performed by your team at Oxford Brookes University, and the way in which it has benefitted all ‘BMW iprojects after the ‘MINI E’” [5.2]. Specifically, the BMW Group highlighted that the results of the MINI E UK project had direct influence on their electrification strategy, the developments of the BMW i3 and ultimately the MINI Electric, and helped to inform policy-making decisions as well as other EV market stakeholders [5.2].

SVEC’s key contribution to the MINI E UK project was the collation and analysis of vehicle energy use and electricity grid data, plus strategic market analysis, to inform BMW developments in battery management, optimised cabin heating, grid connectivity and business segments for future marketing policy. Furthermore, SVEC worked together with colleagues from the Department of Psychology (OBU) who analysed the social and psychological aspects of driving electric cars, over time. These findings helped to inform BMW’s vehicle cabin design and vehicle interfaces. It also allowed BMW Group to understand how drivers respond to electric cars in terms of expectations, behaviours and opinions. Head of Government Affairs, BMW Group (UK) stated: “…the results proved the vital role charging at home has as a key argument to win potential customers. This strongly shaped public decision making for charging infrastructure as well as BMW Group’s activities in offering installation services as a part of the vehicle purchase process. Results achieved by Oxford Brookes on the MINI E’s characteristics in respect to the enjoyment level in the strong dynamics of electric vehicles also strongly influenced the future BMW “i” strategy” [5.2]. OBU research findings were reviewed at project meetings and workshops in UK and Germany and influenced designers, engineers and business decision-makers. The company also emphasised that “the customer data and insight, in which Oxford Brookes were so instrumental in delivering has proved immensely useful too, especially in political conversations throughout the world” [5.2].

The MINI E UK project proved to be a strong basis for development of the BMW “ i” brand. The early project findings informed development of the 2011 BMW Active E, an electric derivative of the BMW 1 Series Coupe used to validate future powertrain developments, in preparation for the 2013 BMW i3, the first purpose-built EV from the BMW Group [5.2]. The i3 EV production began in September 2013 and it has been a highly successful model with more than 200,000 units sold worldwide by October 2020 [5.3] (sales value ~GBP6billion). It is now in its third evolution, with a larger battery pack and two performance versions.

The BMW Group has fully committed itself to electrification since the inaugural i3. By the end of 2019 BMW had sold over 500,000 electrified vehicles [5.4]. In September 2019, the MINI Electric made its public debut at the Frankfurt motor show and the first UK cars were delivered in March 2020. BMW Group said: “ MINI Electric is probably the best local success story, as what set out as a British applied research project many years ago has come full circle with the local production of the MINI Electric in the Oxford plant” [5.2]. The firm’s Oxford plant built more than 11,000 units by the end of July 2020 – more than 3,000 of which found homes on UK driveways, making Britain the EV’s second largest market [5.5]. The Managing Director of MINI’s Plant Oxford noted: “ Everyone at Plant Oxford is immensely proud that our hard work integrating MINI Electric into the production line is paying off, with the car proving so popular with customers in the UK and around the world. As the home of the brand, it gives us huge satisfaction to build the first fully-electric car in the MINI product line-up here in Oxford, for global export[5.5]. By 2021, BMW Group will have five all-electric models, including MINI Electric and BMW i3, iX3, i4 and iNEXT. Additionally, they are committed to bring 25 electrified vehicles to the market by 2023 [5.2, 5.4].

Further influence on general acceptance of, and implementation strategies for, electric vehicles was enabled through collaboration with the UK Centre of Excellence for Low Carbon and Fuel Cell Technologies (CENEX). Together, OBU and CENEX combined information on driver adaptation, infrastructure requirements, cost barriers, EV charging behaviour and energy use, from all eight of the UK Ultra Low Carbon Vehicle (ULCV) trials to provide a national picture for the Technology Strategy Board (TSB) and Office for Low Emission Vehicles (OLEV) [5.6]. CENEX later reported: “ The programme outcomes identified infrastructure and cost barriers that influenced subsequent Government policy and actions such as further funding for EV deployments, learning activities, Plugged-in-Places funding to help urban regions with infrastructure installation … and undoubtedly influenced OEM EV developments and UK government policy” [5.7]. This is evidenced in the government’s continuing commitment to electrification through subsidies for EV purchase and home charging installation, zero road tax, provision of public charging infrastructure and unification of charge point access and payment for customers.

Impact on transport policy

Professor Hutchinson was an influential member of the Board of the Low Carbon Vehicle Partnership (LowCVP) 2014-16. This public-private partnership, part-funded by the Department for Transport (DfT), exists to accelerate a sustainable shift to lower carbon vehicles and fuels. SVEC’s whole life cycle research outputs, brought to the Board by Hutchinson, focused attention on energy and emissions of different vehicle types. The Managing Director of LowCVP stated: “…the work Oxford Brookes carried out, on the applications and on Life Cycle Analysis of the sector, represented a unique assessment of the broad full life GHG impact potential of the PLV (Powered Light Vehicle) relative to the existing body of work for conventional vehicles” [5.8]. SVEC’s research emphasized the need for small urban EVs and our life cycle assessment data and analysis were included in reports and supporting recommendations for adoption of future urban transport, such as ‘ Micro Vehicles - Opportunities for L-Category Vehicles in the UK’ (LowCVP, 2019) [5.9]. “The valuable work Oxford Brookes helped deliver within a unique collaboration of academic institutions in support of the LowCVP PLV initiative. The work LowCVP and the group have developed on PLV has been referenced within our subsequent activity on commercial vehicle applications, the ‘Future of Mobility’ consultations and within the overall Transport Decarbonisation plan due to be published by DfT (in Spring 2021). We fundamentally believe, based on the original work from our academic PLV interest group, that there is a huge opportunity for this vehicle category to contribute to both UK industrial strength and to the decarbonisation of UK transport in pursuit of our Net Zero targets”. [5.8, 5.10].

In summary, SVEC’s multi-disciplinary and cross-sector approach to analysing and addressing the technical and social elements around the transition to electric vehicles, has benefitted the automotive industry, consumers and transport policy-makers. It has played an important part in enabling the shift to the ‘new normal’ of electric vehicles, which has environmental benefits for us all. Further, our life cycle assessment model outputs are informing policy debate and strategic investment in UK battery manufacturing and recycling. Our work since 2011 has addressed the circular economy for electric vehicle traction batteries with a TSB pilot project, followed by a multi-partner EU Framework 7 project. We are now a partner in the Faraday Institution, EPSRC-funded, multi-partner GBP9,354,458 Reuse and Recycling of Lithium Ion Batteries (ReLIB) project (FIRG005, 2018-2021, Co-PI: Hutchinson).

5. Sources to corroborate the impact

[5.1] A Smith MP (Oxford East (Lab)). Hansard, 24th June 2015.

[5.2] Head of Government Affairs, BMW Group (UK). Letter to Oxford Brookes University, 14th November 2019.

[5.3] Press releases by BMW Group: i) Six years of BMW i3: Electric vehicle pioneers drive over 200,000 km in their BMW i3 ( 02.01.2020) and ii) First of its kind and innovation driver for sustainable mobility: 200 000 BMW i3 produced to date ( 16.10.2020).

[5.4] BMW Sustainable Value Report 2019. Available at: https://www.bmwgroup.com/content/dam/grpw/websites/bmwgroup_com/responsibility/downloads/en/2020/2020-BMW-Group-SVR-2019-Englisch.pdf

[5.5] Examples of news items about MINI Electric: i) Autocar, New Mini Electric revealed as affordable Brit-built EV ( 09.07.2019) and ii) Auto Express, MINI Electric production passes 11,000 unit milestone ( 30.07.2020).

[5.6] S Carroll et al (2013). ‘Assessing the viability of EVs in daily life’, Final Report, CENEX and Oxford Brookes University, September.

[5.7] Head of Transport, CENEX. Letter to Oxford Brookes University, 11th December 2019.

[5.8] Managing Director, Low Carbon Vehicle Partnership. Letter to Oxford Brookes, 14th October 2020.

[5.9] LowCVP (2019) ‘Micro Vehicles – Opportunities for Low Carbon L-Category Vehicles in the UK’.

[5.10] MCIA (2019) ‘The Route to Tomorrow’s Journeys: Powered Light Vehicles – Practical, Efficient & Safe Transport for All’. Available at: https://mcia.co.uk/en/the-route

Showing impact case studies 1 to 3 of 3

Filter by higher education institution

UK regions
Select one or more of the following higher education institutions and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No higher education institutions found.
Institutions

Filter by unit of assessment

Main panels
Select one or more of the following units of assessment and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No unit of assessments found.
Units of assessment

Filter by continued case study

Select one or more of the following states and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.

Filter by summary impact type

Select one or more of the following summary impact types and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.

Filter by impact UK location

UK Countries
Select one or more of the following UK locations and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No UK locations found.
Impact UK locations

Filter by impact global location

Continents
Select one or more of the following global locations and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No global locations found.
Impact global locations

Filter by underpinning research subject

Subject areas
Select one or more of the following underpinning research subjects and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No subjects found.
Underpinning research subjects