Impact case study database
Search and filter
Filter by
- Leeds Beckett University
- 17 - Business and Management Studies
- Submitting institution
- Leeds Beckett University
- Unit of assessment
- 17 - Business and Management Studies
- Summary impact type
- Societal
- Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
- No
1. Summary of the impact
Anchor institutions make a major contribution to the character of a regional economy. Leeds Business School’s (LBS) research is transforming how these organisations operate in the City of Leeds, providing an evidence-based foundation for policy that supports inclusive economic growth, ensuring fairer distribution of income and employment opportunities in the City. Action learning with 12 anchors over a two-year period (2015-17) co-created an innovative framework that is used to assess ‘good jobs’ in the supply chain and has encouraged organisations to spend more of their procurement budgets locally, with one anchor changing its discretionary spend from 25% to 60% channelled into the local economy. The research has inspired Leeds City Council to establish a permanent anchor network within the city, informed its City Region Inclusive Growth Strategy and informed policy approaches taken by the West Yorkshire Combined Authority and beyond (i.e. Wales and Key Cities Networks). During 2020, the research contributed to regional planning for sustainable, post-pandemic recovery.
2. Underpinning research
Despite being one of the wealthiest nations in the world, more than one in five people experience poverty in the UK ( Social Metrics Commission). One policy response has seen the emergence of anchor institutions (anchors) as a means of addressing the persistent problem of poverty. Anchors – such as local authorities, hospitals and universities, make a major contribution to the character of a local economy through the amount they spend and the number they employ. At a time when public sector reform and greater devolution is creating space for these organisations to contribute to inclusive economic growth objectives, our research has identified major opportunities to alleviate poverty through innovation, co-production and new forms of collaboration between local organisations within and across sectors.
Drawing on more than a decade of applied research associated with devolution and regeneration of deprived communities, Sanderson (R3) called for ‘intelligent policy making’ which identified the potential that action research and learning can play in supporting local economic development partnerships to improve their effectiveness in dealing with complex problems such as poverty. The research argues for the need to review the ideas that underpin thinking about evidence-based policy making, and move beyond the territory of instrumental rationality to a position founded upon two intellectual pillars: our developing knowledge about complexity and the role that practical knowledge plays in guiding action to address complex social problems.
During a similar time-frame, Yeo and Gold (R4) were exploring the role of action learning within the discipline of Human Resource Development (HRD) and conceptualising the process as a type of transformative experience. They argue that linking action learning to HRD can lead to a continuous process of questioning complexity in organisations. Combining and extending these ideas informed the design, development and implementation of an action learning project (commissioned by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, JRF) to explore the role that anchor institutions play in alleviating the complex problem of poverty in the Leeds City Region (LCR).
The research engaged twelve anchor organisations over a two year period (2015-17) and sought to encourage innovation in a variety of domains including influencing the money that is spent in the local economy through procurement activity and the provision of ‘good jobs’ that minimise the risk of in-work poverty. Working together, the anchors participating in the project found that they spent more than £1.4bn a year on procuring goods and services and identified the opportunity to shift just 10% of this spending to suppliers in the LCR which could be worth an additional £168 to £196m to the city region economy (R1). They also co-created a unique framework for ‘good work’ to apply to analysis of employment in their own organisations and in organisations operating in their supply-chains. Anchors then set about seeking to innovate in a variety of ways. This might seem from the outside easier than is the case, as it often takes considerable knowledge, skill, time and perseverance for innovative ideas to take root and become accepted (R2).
The selected outputs include a commissioned report (R1) ‘More jobs, better jobs’ partnership between the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, Leeds City Council and the Leeds City Region with findings from a review of practice internationally and action research. R2 is a paper focused on evidenced based change and was recognised in 2020 for the Human Resource and Development book of the year prize. R3 focuses on policy making in complex environments and R4 on action learning methodology and both are published in journals with an ABS 2* ranking.
3. References to the research
R1 Devins, D., Gold, J., Boak, G., Garvey, R. and Willis, P. (2017) Maximising the impact of anchors in the Leeds City Region https://www.jrf.org.uk/report/maximising-local-impact-anchor-institutions-case-study-leeds-city-region
R2 Devins. D., Watson, A., and Turner, P. (2019) Evidence Based Change in a UK Public Sector Organisation. In Evidence Based Organizational Change and Development. IGI Global. Winner of the Academy of Human Resource Development. Wayne Pace HRD Book of the Year Award 2020.
R3 Sanderson, I (2009) Intelligent Policy Making for a Complex World: Pragmatism, Evidence and Learning, Political Studies, 57(4), 699-719, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2009.00791.x
R4 Yeo. R.K. and Gold. J. (2011) The inseparability of action and learning: unravelling Revans' action learning theory for Human Resource Development (HRD), Human Resource Development International, 14:5, 511-526, DOI: 10.1080/13678868.2011.604956
4. Details of the impact
The research has directly contributed to Leeds City Council putting in place strategies and practice changes that have progressed the City’s vision of creating an inclusive economy, focused on social goals, social justice and environmental sustainability. This has included establishing a permanent Leeds Anchor Network, directing more of the anchor organisations’ procurement budgets into the local economy and supporting ‘good jobs’ within the supply chain. The six local authorities that make up the West Yorkshire Combined Authority have also benefitted from the research findings and it has been used to inform inclusive growth planning by the Welsh Government and the Key Cities Network’s engagement with government.
The research findings were a major lever in mobilising support from the anchor organisations within in the City to move towards creating an inclusive local economy. The research enabled the anchors to collectively identify and to take the first steps towards changing their own practices and policies. The Lead Officer for Skills and Employment at Leeds City Council at the time explained how important the findings were in initiating a programme of change:
*… there was real interest in the Anchor concept at the Council and in February 2018, I submitted a report to the Council’s Leadership Team and the Cabinet on a proposed programme to be taken forward at the Leeds local authority geography with key local partners. The ability to reference independent academic research which identified key levers and quantified the potential impact was invaluable in securing ownership by key strategic leaders. For example, the report estimated that collective action to shift a further 10% of anchor institutions’ procurement expenditure to the Leeds City Region would be worth £170-£190m to the local economy every year, supporting local businesses and in turn jobs growth – this headline really helped to secure attention and support (C1a, former Chief Officer Employment and Skills, Leeds City Council).
Recognition that procurement can be one of the best ways of connecting economic growth to alleviate poverty emerged during the research. By developing a better understanding of the effects of their organisational spend, participating organisations were able to look to increase their impact on the local economy, establish targets for redirecting spend locally, adapt procurement processes and seek to develop capacity within local supply chains. Representatives of local authority procurement teams in West Yorkshire worked collaboratively during and after the project, sharing information and knowledge, acting as ambassadors for change in their organisations and influencing £150,000,000 procurement spend in the West Yorkshire Combined Authority.
One of the research participants, Leeds City Council, commissioned external consultants to undertake more detailed analysis of their procurement spend (C2, CLES, 2019) and shared this with other partners in a newly established ‘Leeds anchor network’ (see below). The report recommendations called for the City’s anchors to ensure their own procurement practices were accessible to a diverse supply chain to open up opportunities, to engage with suppliers to enhance their understanding of social value and to introduce contract monitoring systems to track progress on spend figures and its indirect impact. The research framework has informed the development of a new procurement strategy (2019-2024) in Leeds (implemented as a consequence of the Inclusive Growth Strategy, 2017-18), setting out improvements to deliver wider social value, including a commitment to paying the real living wage, through procurement. The Council’s spend with third parties through procurement and commissioned activity remains close to £800,000,000 per annum and engages over 930 contractors (C3, Leeds City Council, 2020). Within one of the university anchors, the procurement team embraced the opportunity to embed sustainability into all procurement activity. The analysis and subsequent actions has seen the university move from about a quarter to almost 60% of discretionary spend in the city, 70% of which is now with small and medium sized businesses, with 20% in the most deprived areas of Leeds. The University now monitors and reports on this spend and continually improves measurement and reporting on impact.
Participating organisations also used the co-produced framework for good jobs to review existing employment practices with a particular focus on understanding and meeting the needs and aspirations of the lowest paid. Research outputs realised in the course of the action research project included the identification of almost 50 good practices associated with initiatives to support inclusive growth and alleviate poverty. The sharing of this knowledge amongst participants created a platform to support innovation and provided a foundation for impact in participating organisations. Leeds City Council was particularly proactive in this domain, conducting reviews and developing or refining interventions to better meet the needs of those at risk of in-work poverty in their workforce (15,000 workers). Changes include payment of the real living wage, fringe benefits designed to meet the needs of those at risk of poverty, advice and guidance to support financial inclusion, health and wellbeing initiatives (see R2). They extended this work through the West Yorkshire Combined Authority with the sharing of good practice providing a source of inspiration and practical ideas to support change in human resource management and development practices in other local authorities. The Procurement Manager at York Teaching Hospitals Trust adapted the procurement process to include the framework for Good Jobs in their tendering process for local services (£4,500,000) and continues to promote it with peers in other areas of the Yorkshire region.
The research recommendations highlighted the role that local authorities have to play in catalysing and coordinating collaborative anchor activity, making the most of their convening role and enabling other anchors to contribute to the alleviation of poverty. The action research project provided a foundation for this through learning sets developing practical intelligence associated with procurement and employment and the City Council used this knowledge to embrace the opportunity to facilitate the development of a Leeds Anchors Network (C4, Leeds City Council, 2018). Leeds City Council made further investments to develop the approach outlined in the underpinning research to support the implementation of the anchors initiative (C5, Leeds City Council).
The Council has convened a group of a dozen large organisations rooted in the city, a network of universities, colleges, health and hospital trusts, and major utilities that acts a pillar of a wider inclusive strategy in the city of Leeds. The aim is to increase the positive impact these organisations have on the City, and in particular to provide more support to those suffering disadvantage (C6, Leeds City Council Anchors Network). These anchors employ 1 in 7 of the Leeds workforce, and spend more than £2,000,000,000 every year on goods and services. The Leeds Anchor Network is chaired by the Vice Chancellor of Leeds Beckett and is encouraging innovation to increase the amount of money circulating in the city economy through targeting local spend and supporting the development of sustainable local supply chains (C7, Leeds in Conversation). The Chief Officer, Culture and Economy at Leeds City Council confirmed the centrality of the Anchor network in realising the City Council’s vision of economic growth that is fairly distributed across society:
*‘We see the Leeds Anchors Network as being a fundamental partnership in the city in terms of helping us deliver against our inclusive growth strategy’ (C1b, Chief Officer, Culture and Economy, Leeds City Council).
LBS’s research on the use of evidence in policy making and the role that anchor institutions play has been applied more widely. The Corporate Policy Manager at Wakefield Municipal District Council notes the impact of the underpinning research on the Key Cities Network, a network of 24 mid-size cities and urban areas located across the UK. The research has provided the group with evidence that it has used to engage and lobby with ministers at the Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) and Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS).
*The work on Anchor Institutions in the LCR was highly influential across Key Cities authorities, particularly in supporting the work of the WYCA’s Inclusive Growth Group. It provided information and data for engagement and lobbying with government ministers, both at MHCLG and BEIS, around raising the potential and profile of Key Cities members with government and a greater focus on inclusive growth.” (C1c, Corporate Policy Manager at Wakefield Municipal District Council)
Professor Devins’s work also supported a number of subsequent policy reports prepared by Key Cities. It has shaped thinking and planning with politicians and officers at local and regional level including the issues around the wider inclusive growth agenda and to the development of Local Industrial Strategies.
The Welsh Government has used the research to consider the development of a framework to promote shared value and an approach to evaluation that encourages learning and sustainable development (C8, WCPP, 2017). One of the authors (Devins) of the underpinning research has informed further policy scoping work undertaken by NHS England and is acknowledged by the World Health Organisation in a report that brings forward new evidence, practical methods and opportunities to show how the health sector is essential to a stable, functioning economy (C9, Boyce and Brown, 2019). More recently the underpinning research and the Leeds Anchors Network are cited in a report highlighting the role of health in driving inclusive, economic growth in a post-pandemic future (C10, Yhealth4growth, 2020). Most recently of all, the Dean of LBS, University Head of Procurement, and the Chief Executive of Leeds City Council discussed the impact of the Anchor network/model at InvestNorth 2021, a major new conference attended by the Government Minister for the Northern Powerhouse alongside public and private sector leaders.
5. Sources to corroborate the impact
C1 Testimonials from the Leeds City Region: a former Lead Officer for Skills and Employment at Leeds City Council; b Chief Officer, Culture and Economy at Leeds City Council; c Corporate Policy Manager, Wakefield Metropolitan District Council [included as PDFs]
C2 CLES (2019) Progressing Procurement Processes and Practices in Leeds. Report prepared by Centre for Local Economic Strategies [included as PDF]
C3 Leeds City Council (2020) Report to Infrastructure, Investment and Inclusive Growth Scrutiny Board Date: 8 January 2020. [included as PDF]
C4 Leeds City Council (2018) Report to Infrastructure, Investment and Inclusive Growth Scrutiny Board Date: 31 October 2018. [included as PDF]
C5 Leeds City Council, ‘The Leeds Anchors Network: A place based approach to inclusive growth’ presentation [included as PDF]
C6 Leeds City Council Anchors Network Website [not suitable for PDF, freely accessible online] http://www.leedsgrowthstrategy.co.uk/anchor-institutions/
C7 Leeds in Conversation (2020) Podcast [not suitable for PDF, freely accessible online] https://leedsinconversation.podbean.com/e/episode-nine-leeds-anchors-network/
C8 WCPP (2017) Achieving Inclusive Growth in Wales. Wales Centre for Public Policy Online [included as PDF]
C9 Boyce, T. and Brown, C. (2019) Economic and Social impacts and benefits of health systems (p. ix) Copenhagen. World Health Organization. [included as PDF]
C10 Yhealth4growth (2020) Levelling up Yorkshire and Humber. Health as the new wealth post-Covid (pp.20-23 and 37) Yorkshire and Humber Academic Health Network, NHS Confederation Yorkshire Universities [included as PDF]
- Submitting institution
- Leeds Beckett University
- Unit of assessment
- 17 - Business and Management Studies
- Summary impact type
- Societal
- Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
- No
1. Summary of the impact
Leeds Business School research has directly informed and influenced communication management practices around the world. The Global Communication Monitor (GCM), comprising the European, North American, Asia-Pacific and Latin American Communication Monitors and originally devised with Prof Ralph Tench, is the largest longitudinal study of its kind with over 80,000 communication professionals contributing from 80 countries. Analysis of its data has identified new sector-wide challenges, trends in practitioner skills that inform CPD and workforce decisions, and actions to address gender inequality. The competency framework and benchmarking tools developed from the research have benefitted all levels of the industry, from national professional organisations to individual practitioners in Europe, South East Asia, and the Americas. GCM has created a global network of academics and practitioners who share best practice and knowledge, contributing to sustainability of the sector by shaping the higher education curricula around the world to ensure future practitioners are equipped to meet the industry’s changing needs.
2. Underpinning research
In the early 2000s there was a growing recognition that good quality strategic communication was an essential component of business success. But the industry was still relatively young and largely unregulated, with huge variations across Europe and the rest of the world in terms of professionalism, access to education, peer support and training. For researchers and practitioners there was little comparable primary data to draw on. The European Communication Monitor (ECM), launched in 2007, is the largest longitudinal co-produced research programme in public relations and strategic communications globally. It is a collaboration between private sector funders and academic collaborators and led by Prof Ralph Tench of LBS alongside specialists from the universities of Leipzig (Germany), Amsterdam (Netherlands), Ljubljana (Slovenia) and Rey Juan Carlos Madrid (Spain) (P1).
Prior to the ECM, trans-European research was restricted by paradigmatic barriers (different research cultures) and pragmatic limitations (language differences and lack of contact data). The research team created an empirical study to produce a comparative picture of the state and structure of communication management in Europe and later worldwide. Constructed around a core question bank, the project has collected data from over 50,000 European respondents in 15 years, and reached 80,000 in the last 5 years as the global survey was introduced. This enabled the researchers to longitudinally track characteristics and explore variation across regions, undertake country-to-country comparisons and benchmark organisations, enabling the identification of issues and areas for practice improvement. Since 2015, the ECM has been joined by bi-annual surveys in the Asia-Pacific, Latin America and North America (since 2018) regions, which together form the GCM. The APCM, LAM and NACM are conducted in partnership with leading universities in each continent: Georgia State and Oregon State (USA), UTS Sydney (Australia), Nanyang Technological University (Singapore), Hong Kong Baptist, Massey (NZ), ULBRA (Brazil), University of Communication (Mexico), and Universidad de Medellín (Colombia).
The GCM has cut through contextual idiosyncrasies to create generalisable findings to identify areas for improvement and to create resources. The GCM results are widely used by academic researchers and practitioners across the globe. Key findings from the research revealed:
In 2006 the communications sector was in a state of flux. The unregulated industry faced significant growth, diversification and specialisation at a time of mass EU expansion (2004 & 2007). Whilst some organisation types (and indeed sub-regions) enjoyed concentrations of high quality, high performing communications functions, the majority did not (R1).
As the roles of communications practitioners began transitioning from mainly operational to more strategic and managerial, vast competency variances across practice and countries were revealed (R2&7). Communication was maturing into a professional discipline, but it had yet to adopt the qualities that marked out other management professions, such as formal qualifications and life-long learning. Practitioners needed to shift away from a learning-on-the-job approach to align their development with academic learning. Likewise, higher education providers needed to adapt their teaching to the changing requirements of the sector (R1&2).
Rapid technological progress and the emergence of new communications channels created knowledge gaps and new policy requirements. Only a minority of practitioners were prepared adequately to respond to the changes. When social media use took off, only one-third of European organisations had implemented social media policies. Similarly, organisations were underprepared for the challenges posed by new communications channels, e.g. to reputation (cybersecurity) or credibility (fake news) (R3&4).
Clear gender divides exist within the sector. Whilst women make up nearly 60% of the communications workforce, salaries reported by female practitioners were lower. Women in advertising reported exclusion from business decisions, sexism and sexual harassment, as well as masculine organisational culture and “boys’ clubs” that impede career progression (R5&6).
3. References to the research
The selected outputs offer an original theory building contribution and/ or are published in the leading peer-reviewed communications journals, listed as A or A* in the ABCD list (Public Relations Review, IJIM) and have high citation and indexing scores
R1 Tench, R., Verčič, D., Zerfass, A., Moreno, A. & Verhoeven, P. (2017). Communication Excellence - How to Develop, Manage and Lead Exceptional Communications. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48860-8 [included as PDF]
R2 Tench, R., Moreno, A. (2014). Mapping communication management competencies for European practitioners: ECOPSI an EU study. Journal of Communication Management, 19(1), 39-61. doi: 10.1108/JCOM-11-2013-0078 (P2)
R3 Wiesenberg, M., and Tench, R. (2019). Deep strategic mediatization: Organizational leaders’ knowledge and usage of social bots in an era of disinformation. International Journal of Information Management, 102042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.102042
R4 Verhoeven, P., Tench, R., Zerfass, A., Moreno, A., & Verčič, D. (2012). How European PR practitioners handle digital and social media. Public Relations Review, 38(1), 162-164. doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.08.015
R5 Topic, M., Tench, R., & Moreno, A. (2017). Male and Female Communication, Leadership Styles and the Position of Women in Public Relations. Interactions: Studies in Communication and Culture. doi: 10.1386/iscc.8.2-3.231_1
R6 Topić, M., Cunha, M. J., Reigstad, A., Jelen-Sanchez, A., & Moreno, Á. (2020). Women in public relations (1982–2019). Journal of Communication Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-11-2019-0143
R7 Verhoeven, P., Zerfass, A., Verčič, D., Moreno, A. and Tench, R. (2020) Strategic Communication across Borders: Country and Age Effects in the Practice of Communication Professionals in Europe, International Journal of Strategic Communication, 14:1, 6072, DOI: 10.1080/1553118X.2019.1691006
Funded Projects: P1 ECM 2007-present funded by Cision, ~ €1.4m (private funding); P2 ECOPSI funded through Erasmus+ ~ €500,000; P3 Women in Advertising, British Academy ~ £10,000
4. Details of the impact
LBS’s ongoing analysis of ECM data has contributed to the development of global communication management practice. Research insights have directly supported the sustainability of the global communications industry by helping it to prepare for new sector wide challenges; to identify trends in practitioner skills to inform training and education; and prompting action to address gender equality. The research has benefitted industry associations and professionals in large multi-national corporations through to small operators by enabling global sharing of best practice and academic/industry knowledge exchange. The ECM’s findings are regularly shared via its website ( viewed by 31,264 people between 2014-2020, academic conferences, professional presentations, webinars, podcasts and videos on YouTube (that have been viewed a total of 32,681 times between 2014-2020).
The GCM has created a worldwide network of 80,000 communication professionals, practitioners and academics in over 80 countries. This network is contributing to sector development by identifying and sharing best practice, monitoring and benchmarking strategic priorities and enhancing cross cultural co-operation. Central to the network’s success is a close collaboration between researchers and practitioners. The European network has expanded from the original 5 to 28 institutions (December 2020) in Europe and worldwide this has expanded in 5 years with 40 more academic institutions forming their own regional networks (Asia Pacific, 16; Latin America, 19; North America, most recently, 10). *“The success of the ECM demonstrated the value of this kind of data and the feasibility of a project on this scale, and the NACM is a direct result of the value coming out of the European version.” (C1). The Latin American Monitor (LAM) has also developed a Spanish speaking practitioner network (Fundacom), helping to generate new insights, increase discourse and develop theories and practice to improve performance across the sector: *“It is important to have different surveys in different areas. We can learn from the other areas and see what they are doing. For example, Latin American PR departments have good skills in CSR because sustainability is important, so businesses in Spain can learn from this. It is important to know what trends are in Latin America because a lot of big Spanish companies also have companies in Latin America..” ( **C2.*)
The ECM research team established a competency framework to standardise role requirements across the sector and devised a framework of excellence as a blueprint for quality (R1). These tools model the characteristics of high-performing communication departments, enabling organisations and individuals to identify training and development needs to address inconsistencies in communications performance, practices and standards. The tools have been used widely across the sector to inform practice and to decide what training opportunities to offer, as evidenced by two examples from senior UK and EU practitioners:
*“[when] I was Chief Engagement Officer at Ketchum, a major international agency. I used the ECM as part of the continuous professional development platform, which is used by all 2,500 practitioners in the agency. It runs a syllabus and every three to six months it provides training around a contemporary area of public relations practice and would inevitably draw on the ECM for insight.” ( C3, **Past President, Chartered Institute of Public Relations (CIPR)*).
“ *The ECM’s data on trends shows what is on the mind of other colleagues, which in turn reflects on priorities for training. It influenced decisions about budget, in terms of which types of courses to get them on, or which type of coaching to give them. It did inform different aspects because […] you could see how some concepts in the profession are different by geographic region.” ( C5, Former Corporate and Online Communications Manager IBM Europe)
The North American Commission on Public Relations Education (CPRE) has used the ECM’s resources on competency and frameworks to inform the development of public relations curricula within the US education system. As a member of its Advisory Board (2015-2021), Prof Tench has drawn on the research to contribute to influential CPRE global education papers and reports. Tench has been invited to stay on beyond 2021, increasing opportunities for the research to influence practice in the US (C4&10).
The research team developed benchmarking tools, based on the capabilities of over 50,000 (European) communication professionals from 48 countries. This enables individuals and organisations to benchmark their own capabilities around key topics such as AI, cybersecurity and fake news and to review and adapt their processes to ensure they are competitive and ethically astute. Since 2019 the benchmarking tools had been accessed by over 746 practitioner organisations in 25 countries. A past president of the professional body that oversees PR in the UK, explains its value to the sector : “ *Year on year it is a useful tool to understand practice and benchmark and then as an ongoing diagnostic for organisations to measure excellence and performance against this. The trend data is useful to understand the evolution of practice – because much of our profession is changing - it is interesting to understand that from an executional point of view helping inform education providers, professional bodies like the CIPR and individual organisations.” ( C3 Past President (CIPR).* It has also been used to contribute to workforce planning, recruitment and selection processes as evidenced below by a German member of the GCM network: *“[The ECM] can give me an indication regarding the future topics of PR; it gives me also a good indication in which areas I have to further develop the skills of my team. I can see whether data-driven PR or algorithm-based analysis, stakeholder orientation or NGO focus is in the forefront of thinking and if I don’t have the right people in my team, I get an indication for the need to train or hire them.*” *( C6. Executive Vice President Corporate Communications & Governmental Affairs, Bosch GmbH).
ECM findings also raise awareness of workplace conditions and one of the issues highlighted is persistent gender inequalities within the sector and in every region. This has promoted UK industry members to initiate change within their organisations to increase transparency to reduce gender gaps : “The ECM has been helpful in raising awareness of issues like the gender pay gap, as PR is a feminised profession; the ECM’s reporting on this has led trade organisations to start to measure and characterise that issue particularly as it relates to their own market. The CIPR (10,000 members) and PRCA (30,000 members) both now conduct census surveys and publish data on their membership annually. It would be unthinkable now if they didn’t.” ( **C3.**)
Prompted by the ECM findings, Dr Martina Topić led a stand-alone project, Women in Advertising (2018) to explore inequalities in this sector. Women reported exclusion from business decisions, sexism and sexual harassment, as well as masculine organisational cultures that impede career progression. This research has reached communicators across Europe via practice social media networks and led to change at a media agency in Croatia which commented that it was “...profoundly changing the nature of work in Croatian journalism by empowering the position of women and by opening the themes that were previously considered as unappropriated in Croatian media spaces.” ( C7) The European Public Relations Research and Education Association (EUPRERA) responded by setting up a network (Women in PR 2018-21) dedicated to influencing change for women around the world. This started with 8 members including founders Topić and Tench and now has 21 members across 9 countries and 14 institutions. An example of an output of this network is a partnership between Women in PR and ULBRA University in Brazil, resulting in greater insights into women’s experiences of working in practice in America and Brazil.
The findings from the GCM family have influenced communications sector teaching within higher education. Evidence from an evaluative survey of the ECM indicated that 66% of academics who took part agreed or strongly agreed that the ECM findings improved understanding of key issues affecting communications practitioners (C8), helping to equip students for work in the sector. A textbook based on the research findings and initiated and co-authored by Prof. Tench, Exploring Public Relations and Management Communication (Pearson), is now in its 5th edition and is the primary textbook for communication students , demonstrated by global sales in excess of 45,000 copies since 2007. GCM findings have also been used to design curricula in university programmes, ensuring that future communications professionals have key competences necessary to succeed in their roles. For example, the University of Technology Sydney has drawn on the Asia-Pacific Communication Monitor “in updating academic subjects that address culture and cross-cultural communication and expanded our media subjects to reflect models of media in China and other countries in addition to Western models.” **(C9.) Moreover, the GCM network itself has created opportunities for knowledge exchange programmes between academics and practitioners that has helped to shape curricula in HE, provide internships and enhance the skills of practitioners through university-led training opportunities.
5. Sources to corroborate the impact
C1. Testimonial letter from Associate Professor of Public Relations, University of Georgia (USA) [included as PDF]
C2. Testimonial letter from CEO Villafañe & Associates, Spain [included as PDF]
C3. Testimonial letter from Head of Wadds Inc., Visiting Professor in Practice, Newcastle University, Chairman of Future Proof policy unit; former President, Chartered Institute of Public Relations [included as PDF]
C4. North American Commission on Public Relations Education (CPRE) FAST FORWARD Foundations + Future State. Educators + Practitioners report 2017 [included as PDF]
C5. Testimonial letter from President of the International Public Relations Association (IPRA) and former Corporate and Online Communications Manager IBM Europe [included as PDF]
C6. Testimonial letter from Executive Vice President Corporate Communications & Governmental Affairs, Robert Bosch GmbH; Former Head of Corporate Communications and Corporate Responsibility, Deutsche Post DHL Group [included as PDF]
C7. Testimonial letter from the Director, Croatian media agency [included as PDF]
C8. Summary of results from the ECM university usage and impact survey, 2020 [included as PDF]
C9. Comment from Distinguished Professor, Deputy Dean, Faculty of Science, University of Technology Sydney, coordinator for the Asia Pacific Communication Monitor [personal correspondence]
C10. The top 15 public relations insights of 2020 (January 2021), from the Institute for Public Relations Board of Trustees (USA) [included as PDF]
- Submitting institution
- Leeds Beckett University
- Unit of assessment
- 17 - Business and Management Studies
- Summary impact type
- Societal
- Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
- Yes
1. Summary of the impact
Our research on the principles of good practice for SME development is supporting Yorkshire’s regional economy by helping small businesses to survive, grow and thrive. The research informed the development and implementation of regional business support programmes including the Calderdale Business Strategy Programme (2013-2015) and the Ad:Venture programme (2016-2019) which have supported more than 200 SMEs and 1,770 entrepreneurs up to February 2021. Through these networks and 1-to-1 mentoring, 49 jobs were created, and gross value-added across the businesses that engaged during the Calderdale programme (2013-15) increased by £1,242,415. Our research is applied through the establishment of SME knowledge exchange programmes and peer support networks.
2. Underpinning research
For 20 years Professors Devins and Gold, and more recently Dr Jones, have been conducting innovative applied and academic research to support the development and sustainability of smaller businesses. This research is underpinned by an intention to design and develop interventions that recognise the complexity of managing SMEs, raise aspirations, and support their resilience and growth through change.
Realising the ongoing challenge of under-performing SMEs, Gold and Devins (2002) moved attention away from generalised one-size-fits all toolkits towards means of supporting SME managers and their organisations based in a social constructionist framework. Drawing on the literature and interactions with more than 100 SMEs, the analysis highlights the importance of understanding the uniqueness of the business and the crucial role that talk and conversation pla in engaging with the interests of SME leaders (R1). Expanding on this in 2004, Gold and Devins showed how coaching provides a means of working with the values and interests of SMEs to create a conversational space to frame problems and desires as a source of development learning to underpin SME advancement and growth (R2).
These ideas were further developed in a study commissioned by the Small Business Service (2005) highlighting the unique nature of micro-businesses, which account for 96% of the UK business population (5.7 million). The study drew on an extensive analysis of the literature and qualitative research which spotlighted the need to initiate and sustain relationships between micro-business leaders and intervention agencies. This was found to be a critical success factor in the design and delivery (co-production) of relevant business support services. This led to the development of a conceptual model of management learning in micro-businesses which still undergirds the constructs and approach applied by the researchers today, namely that the foundation of successful interventions should be the interests of the managers themselves (R3).
Building on this, later research (2006) showed how the informal aspects of learning in SMEs can be stimulated by action learning (AL). AL also allows critical reflection to be embraced and encourages a commitment to act. The importance of finding common ground in order to develop effective networks was also emphasised (R4). Gold investigated engagement with SMEs, highlighting how argument and persuasion are crucial skills that allow interaction which attunes to the needs and interests of SME leaders. A framework of SME ‘worlds’ is considered in order to explore how an SME manager, who was antagonistic toward training interventions, was persuaded by an engager to work with a coach to work towards his vision for expansion and growth ( R6).
In further refinement and extension of this research theme, Jones, Gold and Devins (R5) collaborated with others including accountants, bankers and small businesses to design an intervention to support productivity improvements in a study funded by Innovate UK in 2019-20. The action learning drew together stakeholders in the regional eco-system to engage thirty manufacturing SMEs in a process of performance improvement. The research provides insights into the experiences of SMEs participating in the project and highlights the challenging and uncertain journey towards improved productivity experienced by many small businesses and the important role that ‘close others’ play both in engaging SMEs and supporting changes to enhance productivity.
The common thread of this body of research is the focus on the entrepreneurs/leaders, and senior managers as the strategists managing change. It demonstrates through action learning, facilitated via networks, conversations and coaching, that entrepreneurs can implement strategies that enable the sustainable development of SMEs. The learning from the research has been applied to the design and development of national and international leadership programmes, business support networks and knowledge exchange initiatives.
3. References to the research
R1 Gold, J. and Devins, D. (2002) Social Constructionism: a theoretical framework to underpin support for the development of managers in SMEs? Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, Vol.9, No.2, pp.111-119. https://doi.org/10.1108/14626000210427366
R2 Gold, J. and Devins, D. (2004), The Value of HRD in Small Firms: The Role of External Coaching. In J.Stewart and G. Beaver (Eds), HRD in Small Businesses, Routledge, London
R3 Devins, D., Gold, J, Johnson, S. Holden, R. (2005) A conceptual model of management learning in micro businesses: Implications for research and policy. Education and Training, Vol 47, No 8/9. Pp 540-551. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400910510633099
R4 Clarke, J.,Thorpe, R., Anderson,L. and Gold, J. (2006), It's all action, it's all learning: action learning in SMEs, Journal of European Industrial Training; Volume: 30 Issue: 6; p.441 – 455. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090590610688825
R5 Jones, O. and Gold, J and Devins, D (2020) SME productivity stakeholders: Getting in the right orbit. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. ISSN 0043-8022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-06-2019-0274
R6 Gold, J. & Thorpe, R (2008) ‘Training, it's a load of crap!’: the story of the hairdresser and his ‘Suit’, Human Resource Development International, Vol.11, No:4, pp.385-399, DOI: 10.1080/13678860802261579
4. Details of the impact
.
Our research has supported the design, development and delivery of flagship interventions in the Yorkshire region and nationally to support SME start-up and growth that has contributed to new jobs and sustained growth.
The Business Growth Calderdale (2013-2015) programme was a £3 million project, part funded by the European Regional Development Fund. Our understanding of the critical success factors underpinning successful engagement of SMEs directly informed a programme of support introduced in the Calderdale local authority area in West Yorkshire. The model encouraged SMEs to contribute to the knowledge production process through a conversational diagnostic to benchmark activity and performance. This intelligence was used to inform the development and delivery of a tailored intervention which drew on one or more of the following services:
innovative classroom-based learning blending academic knowledge with practical intelligence to ensure that the learning was relevant and actionable in the SME context
one-to-one coaching to support knowledge transfer and embedding in the workplace
peer-to-peer learning cohorts
Over two years the programme supported 207 businesses, created 49 jobs and safeguarded 70 more. Furthermore, gross value added across the participating businesses increased by £1,242,415. An independent evaluation of the programme recognised the value of the research-informed approach and its impact on network capability, successful knowledge transfer and SME engagement (C1):
*The success of the Calderdale Growth Strategy programme shaped our business support policy going forward and enabled us to achieve one of our long-held strategic objectives of creating a university presence within the council boundaries. As a council we were very aware that many young people and businesses left our area as we lacked a physical university resource - so it was incredibly important for us to create this presence. The Piece Mill Business Centre, funded through the Ad:Venture programme, has achieved this - it reassures our businesses that there is a long-term commitment and support available and demonstrates how the university can enhance the economic growth within Calderdale. (C1).
As mentioned here, Professors Gold and Devins collaborated on the design of a follow-on programme, Ad:Venture (2016-2022), which drew on the successes of the Calderdale programme in providing support to pre-startup and startup businesses in sectors of strategic importance aligned with both the city-region economic development plan and the government’s Industrial Strategy. The initial phase of the programme (2017-19) focussed on the development of the digital sector in Calderdale and engaged 96 businesses, provided 1650 hours of coaching support, 16 bespoke masterclasses and 16 digital networking and knowledge exchange events. As a result, 8 new jobs were created, 5 businesses progressed from pre- to startup stage, 11 businesses introduced new products or services within their business and 8 introduced new products and services to the market (C2).
*The programme was ideal for us as it had the right blend of advice and coaching and at the core it was adaptable to who we were, where we were at and where we wanted to go – so that tailored approach was really important for us. It certainly helped us though those first couple of critical years – without it I think we’d still be around but the business would probably be about 30-40% lower in terms of turnover. So I can honestly say that Ad:Venture is one of the best things we’ve done. (C2).
Testimonials and case studies provide an insight into the impact the programme can have on participating SMEs with some suggesting 60-70% increase in sales turnover attributed to the programme (C3). As the programme has expanded into other districts, more than 200 small business leaders attended events with 98% reporting a high level of satisfaction. The AdVenture programme as a whole has supported the creation of 345 new jobs (to December 2019).
Drawing on the original model, Devins, Gold and Jones contributed to the development of Leeds Beckett Accelerate, an incubator introduced in 2019 to support early stage entrepreneurs:
*Professor Gold guided the development of the niche Accelerate programme which is unique in offering a more peer support/cohort focussed approach which is different to the other provider offers and more effective. Accelerate contains more participant contact which is vital for early stage entrepreneurs as it is very lonely process running a start-up and they have benefitted from being able to talk to other entrepreneurs in a similar position. This has been particularly helpful through the pandemic as it has enabled businesses to support each other through the programme (C3).
The COVID-19 pandemic spurred programme innovations, with new content, masterclasses, coaching and networking events moving online. The relationship with SMEs has remained strong and testimonials provide evidence of the impact of the programme on SMEs in terms of resilience and business growth (C4).
*… the most valuable aspect of the programme was the one-to-one coaching and mentoring. That made the difference and moved us from thinking, well we’ll just have to pause on this business idea for now because of the pandemic,to actually seeing that there’s an opportunity here and we can do something different. As a result, we’ve continued to trade throughout and have actually grown our business and products. (C4).
The underpinning research highlights the value of business support networks as a way of engaging leaders in peer-to-peer learning that focuses on relevant business issues. The Independent Food and Drink Academy (IFDA) established by Leeds Beckett in 2016 provides smaller businesses in the food and drink sector with facilitated events to support their growth and sustainability. Fifty small business leaders are at the heart of the network, deciding the content and delivery of the activities with opportunities to collaborate and learn from each other to promote the attractiveness of Leeds as a destination (C5).
*I think the IFDA is an invaluable resource to the independent food and drink sector in Leeds. It can definitely help remove the barriers to growth and make the journey a lot less difficult and pain free. I think that the resources for learning, and tools that are available especially for new businesses in their early days when as a business owner you’re spending all of your time on the coalface, to be able to step away from it, and share your troubles and learn from others, whether that is peer to peer, or through you know, professional advice, I think is really, really helpful. I wish it had been there when we opened North Bar over 20 years ago, or that something similar had been in place then (C5).
In response to the Covid-19 pandemic, Gold devised a new action learning programme, Futures and Foresight, to enable SME managers to consider possibilities for at least 5 years ahead as well as to prepare for difficulties. Delivered at a distance by Zoom, the process focuses on the key questions that a business faces against the impact of Covid-19, allowing the group working with the business manager to develop its strategic focus (C6).
*The Futures Thinking work with Professor Jeff Gold has had the following impact on our strategic planning: (1) We now fully understand what the challenges facing us are in both a positive and negative way. (2) This has enabled us to focus on achieving the desired objectives and at the same time avoiding the less desirable outcomes. (C6).
The research also contributed to setting up of another Leeds City Region peer-to-peer network (2018) engaging academics and practitioners with an interest in improving productivity. The network provided a foundation for several interventions including 4 Knowledge Transfer Partnerships with SMEs and an Innovate UK Research (Business Basics) project working with SMEs to support productivity measurement, analysis and improvement. The results of the study are being incorporated into consultations with the regional LEP, who are interested in utilising the power of ‘close others’, and intermediaries to help SMEs in the region. So far 6 busineses have developed their own productivity improvement plans and research results show that they have all increased their performance management capability – one businesses has also successfully applied for a mKTP with LBS. (C7&8).
*Since working with LBS (Dr Ollie Jones) we have gained a much more detailed understanding of efficiency and productivity and how it is an important part of any business. The knowledge has enabled us to increase profits and create an effective, happy and engaged team. The SME Productivity Performance Management Capability Programme is really pushing our skills to the next level with detailed learning activities and the effective use of data to analyse, predict and develop the business and all team members. The results are greater understanding of what productivity means and how this can effectively improve all areas of the business. (C7)
Jones and Gold continue to collaborate with Local Enterprise Partnerships in the North of England Region seeking to engage SMEs and promote improved productivity, resilience and sustainability.
The research has influenced small business support and policy and practice in the UK beyond the Yorkshire region. In 2019-20, Devins collaborated with other leading researchers on the design and delivery of the Chartered Association of Business Schools Leading to Grow (50 SMEs, 2019-2020) and Small Business Leadership Development Programmes (100 SMEs, 2020-21).
5. Sources to corroborate the impact
C1 Testimonial evidence from Calderdale Council’s Business and Skills Manager [included as PDF]
C2 Testimonial evidence from Ad:Venture participant [included as PDF]
C3 Testimonial evidence from Ad:Venture Programme Manager at Leeds City Council [included as PDF]
C4 Testimonial evidence from Accelerate participant [included as PDF]
C5 Testimonial evidence from IFDA participant [included as PDF]
C6 Testimonial comment from a Partner, Graywoods [included as PDF]
C7 Testimonial Managing Director at cardboard packaging business Greyhound Box [included as PDF]
C8 Business Basics 2: Proof of Concept Report “Investing in SME productivity growth by developing their performance management capability”. Complete draft being reviewed by funder; not final for publication. [included as PDF]