Skip to main

Impact case study database

The impact case study database allows you to browse and search for impact case studies submitted to the REF 2021. Use the search and filters below to find the impact case studies you are looking for.

Search and filter

Filter by

  • The University of Liverpool
   None selected
  • 15 - Archaeology
   None selected
   None selected
   None selected
   None selected
   None selected
   None selected
Waiting for server
Download currently selected sections for currently selected case studies (spreadsheet) (generating)
Download currently selected case study PDFs (zip) (generating)
Download tags for the currently selected case studies (spreadsheet) (generating)
Currently displaying text from case study section
Showing impact case studies 1 to 4 of 4
Submitting institution
The University of Liverpool
Unit of assessment
15 - Archaeology
Summary impact type
Cultural
Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
No

1. Summary of the impact

Pembrokeshire Coast National Park’s (PCNP) public presentation of Castell Henllys Iron Age fort and its on-site reconstructed buildings is founded on Mytum’s excavations, reconstructions and ongoing post-excavation using the archive and finds. Research since 2008 has contributed to replacement building reconstructions (2017-2018), a new reconstructed gateway (2019-2020), and updating staff on research. This has transformed the visitor experience at this site which uniquely has extensive reconstruction on an Iron Age excavated settlement. Castell Henllys has enhanced on-site schools’ provision (280 schools visited during census period, 6,000 children per year) using the newly reconstructed roundhouses and excavated evidence to inform teaching and learning through activities.

2. Underpinning research

Mytum has directed all excavations conducted at Castell Henllys – comprising almost complete excavation of the 1ha settlement together with extensive investigation of the surrounding earthworks. He has had direct impact on the designs and construction of all building reconstructions at the site.

A Mytum’s long-term monitoring of the experimental buildings led to their PCNP-funded recording before dismantling, and his subsequent excavation of 2 roundhouse footprints: Cookhouse (2017) and Earthwatch (2018) as experimental archaeology [3.1]. This research specifically informs archaeological understanding of prehistoric building life histories and their physical remains, but also the design and rebuilding of future reconstructed roundhouses. Mytum’s analysis of resource use in the reconstructions – to initially erect and then maintain buildings – leads to understanding of the sustainability of the Iron Age settlement [3.3, 3.4, Barcelona 2018 EAA Session 199 (co-organiser with R Paardekooper), What are we learning from experimental archaeology?]. The excavations also recovered substantial amounts of plastic [3.1]; this was an unexpected research finding which has led to further contemporary archaeology research regarding the presence of plastics in recent cultural deposits and is feeding into on-site PCNP explanation about plastics, sustainability and the environment.

B Mytum’s research on Iron Age hillfort gateways [3.3] and ongoing PCNP-funded research into the structural implications of the Castell Henllys gateway and guard-chambers, revealed previously unconsidered questions regarding roofing and rain runoff. This has enabled detailed three-dimensional reconstructions for the gateway which challenge aspects of previous gateway reconstruction drawings. The complexity of the main gateway on a fort as small as Castell Henllys [3.3] indicates that monumental investment was not only chosen for sites with a large area, such as those with similar gate designs in the Welsh Marches.

C Mytum’s ongoing analysis and interpretation of the excavation archive and finds from the settlement (earthworks published [3.3], structures and finds previously unpublished beyond interim summaries) continues since 2008. This work reveals the settlement structures (range of sizes and foundation methods for buildings across the site and their sequence over time). Detailed study of all artefact classes by Mytum and specialists for the first time, places these in a regional context and they can support explanations of cultural change, social structure [3.2], trade, and landscape exploitation [3.3].

D Mytum has also explicitly researched the use of the site for training and education and how it should be presented to the public [3.3, 3.4, 3.5]. This has identified how the public engage positively with the archaeological research and interpretation process, and that the public can appreciate how uncertainty in reconstruction leads to experiment and advancing knowledge. Mytum’s research and PCNP presentation practice together create a vibrant environment with iterative reflection and action, and they have led to developing the research agenda alongside shifts in interpretation. This creates a dynamic context for research and dissemination that is in itself innovative [3.2, 3.4].

Relevant key contextual information : The last excavation season of ancient remains (2008) was from Liverpool, post-excavation has been in Liverpool from January 2008, and analysis is within this census period using the archive. The reconstruction results derive from Mytum’s long-term experiment including throughout the census period and collaborative fieldwork linked to their dismantling, redesign, rebuilding (2017, 2018). The 2017 and 2018 fieldwork was undertaken with Meek, then of Dyfed Archaeological Trust. The gateway reconstruction is ongoing, interrupted by coronavirus measures so still not completed.

3. References to the research

3.1 Mytum, H. and J. Meek 2020 Experimental archaeology and roundhouse excavated signatures: the investigation of two reconstructed Iron Age buildings at Castell Henllys, Wales. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences 12:78 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-020-01028-y

3.2 Mytum, H. 2018. The Iron Age Today. Internet Archaeology 48. https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.48.10 . Open access

3.3 Mytum, H. 2013 Monumentality in Late Prehistory: Building and Rebuilding Castell Henllys Hillfort. Book; New York, Springer. ISBN 9781461480273 (electronic bk.) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8027-3

3.4 Mytum, H. 2013 Rebuilding the past: challenges in education and public interpretation at Castell Henllys Iron Age fort. Arqueo Mediterrània 13, 73-81. https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/3106156/

3.5 Mytum, H. 2012 Field Schools: People, Places and Things in the Present, in H. Mytum (ed.) Global Perspectives on Archaeological Field Schools: Constructions of Knowledge and Experience. Springer, New York, 243-249. ISBN 9781461404330 (electronic bk.) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0433-0

All can be supplied by the HEI on request

4. Details of the impact

Mytum initiated the first excavations at Castell Henllys and has directed every excavation at the site; he has played a vital role in all the reconstructions. The PCNP Director of Countryside, Community and Visitor Services has highlighted Mytum’s research as central in the PCNP investment and range of services provided: “we have invested confidently in Castell Henllys, with the knowledge that the sound archaeological findings over the past decades would give it a firm footing” and “the site continues to evolve with the research carried out by archaeologists” [5.1].

A Informing heritage site management at Castell Henllys: renewal and extension of on-site reconstructions – beneficiaries PCNP and all site users

Mytum has used his research and expertise at Castell Henllys to guide and inform the reconstruction of two roundhouses and a monumental gateway on the sites of the original Iron Age structures.

PCNP has invested in rebuilding 2 roundhouses, with Mytum and Meek’s archaeological recording and excavation between dismantling and rebuilding commissioned by PCNP [3.1]. Mytum’s understanding of the archaeological evidence from both the original excavation of prehistoric remains [3.3] and from investigations of the dismantled reconstructions was essential for the integrity of the new reconstructions [5.2]: PCNP notes “his direct contribution towards the design of the roundhouses means that the site continues to be authentic” [5.1]. PCNP Archaeologist notes Mytum’s expertise and supporting research data was essential in ensuring credible new on-site reconstructions, from overall concept to details of materials and techniques: “his advice regarding the design of the new reconstruction has been indispensable in allowing us to create our new building for interpreting the Iron Age” [5.2A, 3.1, 3.2].

Mytum provided archaeologically-informed reconstruction plans and elevations for the first Iron Age gateway to be erected on the site of an original gateway in Britain; the PCNP Buildings Projects Manager acknowledges: “Without his research knowledge the gateway reconstruction could not have been achieved” [5.5C] . Although delayed by covid, Phase A of the reconstruction (timber superstructure and drystone walling of interior and exterior revetments and guard-chambers) is well advanced [5.5A, 5.5B, 5.5C, 3.3]. This will enhance both schools and visitor experiences and demonstrate the monumentality of Iron Age architecture: “ Gateway construction, overseen by Professor Mytum is the next stage of

development” [5.7B].

B Schools provision – beneficiaries PCNP schools interpreters, teachers, school children

The ongoing staff training based on continued research keeps interpretation fresh. The PCNP Education Officer highlights “The basis of PCNPA staff training is the reports written and conclusions drawn from the host of excavations held here. This gives our interpretational staff the knowledge they need to educate not only school children but a whole host of visitors” [5.7B]. Ongoing research on artefact categories have also contributed to the development of PCNP educational materials and the on-site activities: “conclusions drawn by Professor Mytum are put into practice and the village is brought to life through activities such as cooking and daubing [and] textiles workshops” [5.1].

Castell Henllys satisfies the requirements of Key Stage (KS) 2 for the Welsh History curriculum on the Celts. Over 6,000 pupils visit the site on school trips every year [5.7B]. Mytum’s Castell Henllys research data was used for examination materials to interpret remains and reconstructions in Archaeology AS level assessment (2018/2019) [5.7D, 3.3].

The attraction of Castell Henllys to schools is the authenticity based on Mytum’s underlying research and informed reconstruction, and PCNP presentation [5.1, 5.4, 5.7B, 3.2, 3.4]. Over 280 different schools have visited 2014-2018 [5.7A], with a high attendance from SW Wales: Stephen Crabb MP noted: “Castell Henllys remains a firm favourite among schools across our county” [5.8A]. 95% of Pembrokeshire, 95% of Ceredigion, 75% of Swansea, and 75% of Carmarthenshire school children visit at least once during their school career, with over 60 schools participating through the medium of Welsh [5.7A]. Cardiff pupils (approximately 20 schools) come over 145km to learn, despite their proximity to Iron Age reconstructions at St Fagan’s Museum, and schools from England and other parts of Wales also visit.

Children are highly motivated and engaged by their visits and participation in activities inside and outside the reconstructions. Teachers’ feedback includes: “The re-construction of the Chiefs house along with the informed interpretation inspired the children and helped greatly when back in school" and “ The staff where brilliant… All informed and answered a whole manner of questions form [sic] construction techniques, cooking recipes and how they make clothes. The interpretation and construction of the site really did make it a believable and memorable experience," and " Castell Henllys is the only place where you can sit in a meeting house by the fire and let the pupils freely compare what the differences are - you would never get such enthused pupil involvement in the classroom." [5.7B, School web sites 5.7C].

C Engaging the public – beneficiaries PCNP staff and visitors, community volunteer excavators

Mytum has provided training materials for Castell Henllys PCNP staff, and informal advice and collaboration with them during fieldwork [5.2A, 5.7B, 3.1, 3.2 ,3.3, 3.4, 3.5], which results in well-informed, up-to-date, motivated staff. This has led to very high visitor satisfaction with on-site staff knowledge.

The PCNP Director of Countryside, Community and Visitor Services notes: “Castell Henllys is a hub for tourism in the north of the county”; with “on average 20,000 visitors a year” and “5,519 people attended 21 events” in 2018/2019 [5.1, Director of Countryside, Community and Visitor Services]. One tourist stated “I also visited on an archaeology day, so there were talks about the archaeological history of the site” [5.10].

PCNP has developed a site guidebook for the first time during 2020, with the Interpretation Officer stating: “ I drew heavily on the extensive research, themes and arguments set out in your book …as well as more recent publications and as yet unpublished research findings” and “ The level of detail in your research has been vital in constructing a narrative of the Iron Age that is both specific to Castell Henllys and sheds light on Iron Age culture in west Wales.” [5.3, 3.3].

On-site interpretation emphasises authenticity, reconstruction based on the archaeology, and with the staff regularly updated in their training [5.7B, 3.1, 3.2], which is much appreciated by the public. Tripadvisor lists the site as No.1 activity in the region with 236 out of 271 entries rating it as Excellent or Very Good [5.10,1]: “An outstanding recreation, based on the actual footprints of roundhouses and built under close academic supervision” [5.10,5]; “our Iron-age host, someone quite familiar with the archeology of this site …. Castell Henllys makes is [sic] all come alive.” [5.10,5]; “The buildings give a wonderful insight into the technology we never imagined existed in the past” [5.10,6]; * ”friendly, patient and helpful guide … answered all our questions and gave us much insight not only to the period and how our Iron Age relatives lived, but also into the work that has been done and continues to make and maintain this fabulous attraction”* [5.10,7].

The 2017 and 2018 excavations included community volunteers, who experienced a unique learning opportunity because of the excavation’s integration with reconstruction and experimental archaeology. These insights were also communicated to the visitors [5.2A, 5.10,6, 3.2]. Dyfed Archaeological Trust Chief Executive notes: “volunteering at Castell Henllys increased their understanding of the formation process involved in creating an archaeological record.” [5.9A, 3.1]. The archaeological remains can be directly related to known human activities and practices, and visible standing structures, so volunteers can now see this in ancient remains: volunteers noted that: “The idea behind the project was really interesting: using contemporary evidence to help interpret the past. It was quite unlike any other dig we have done and brought home the notion that even the most mundane of evidence can have significance beyond the immediately obvious”;it was a positive experience that extended our archaeological understanding” [5.9B, email dated 21 October 2020]. High plastic finds density also reminded everyone of our contemporary footprint and the PCNP Archaeologist notes that this evidence has “helped the park bring home the message regarding the impact of plastic on the landscape” [5.2A, 3.1].

Particular contribution of the submitted unit's research and acknowledgement of other key research contributions:

Mytum and Meek (Dyfed Archaeological Trust) collaborated equally on the 2017, 2018 fieldwork and community excavation. Its post-excavation, publication preparation, and reconstruction input were led by or were solely by Mytum, publications approved by Meek.

5. Sources to corroborate the impact

5.1 Mytum CH Castell Henllys site.pdf

- email from PCNP Director of Countryside Community & Visitor Services about Mytum’s role in developing the site

5.2 Mytum CH Roundhouse Reconstructions.pdf

- emails from PCNP staff regarding Mytum’s role in the design and construction of the roundhouses at Castell Henllys, including the following:

5.2A Statement from PCNP Archaeologist regarding roundhouses

5.2B Emails from PCNP Building Projects Officer regarding roundhouses

5.3 Mytum CH Castell Henllys guidebook.pdf

- email statement from PCNP Interpretation officer regarding the central role of Mytum’s research results, both published and unpublished

5.4 Mytum CH Community Archaeologist.pdf

- email statement from PCNP Community Archaeologist regarding the effects of research on management at the Castell henllys but also across the National Park

5.5 Mytum CH Gateway Reconstruction.pdf

5.5A PCNP Buildings Manager - Gateway & Ramparts

5.5B PCNP Visitor Services Manager North – Gateway

5.5C PCNP Buildings Manager – statement of Mytum’s role in reconstructions

5.6 Mytum CH Press coverage roundhouses.pdf

- press coverage on-line of new excavations and reconstructions at Castell Henllys

5.7 Mytum CH Schools at Castell Henllys.pdf

- supporting evidence regarding school visits to Castell Henllys, including:

5.7A List of schools that have visited Castell Henllys during the census period provided by PCNP and numbers of schools in each educational authority

5.7B PCNP Education Officer

5.7C Schools web pages re: visits

5.7D AQA AS level examination source book 2019 and AQA emails

5.8 Mytum CH Visit of MP.pdf

- press coverage of MP visit to Castell Henllys

5.9 Mytum CH Community volunteer excavators.pdf

- emails from volunteers and the DAT Director responsible for them

5.9A DAT Director

5.9B Excavation community volunteer experiences

5.10 Mytum CH Tripadvisor comments.pdf

- screen shots of some feedback from visiting public noting authenticity, use of archaeology, knowledge of staff

Submitting institution
The University of Liverpool
Unit of assessment
15 - Archaeology
Summary impact type
Societal
Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
No

1. Summary of the impact

Fitzjohn’s collaborative schools project, Grand Designs in Ancient Greece, combines his research on ancient Greek houses and households with innovative multimedia activities that engage learners through play with LEGO. Grand Designs has transformed the practice of primary and secondary teachers and the experiences of thousands of students in schools across England. Grand Designs’ classroom resources have enhanced teaching within the National Curriculum at Key Stage 2 - Key Stage 3 (KS2-KS3), giving teachers without specialist knowledge the tools to teach Ancient Greece (History), and facilitating innovative cross-curricula teaching of Arts and STEM subjects. Grand Designs has inspired teachers’ creativity in developing their own resources in many subjects, and raised pupil participation and engagement, including those with Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND).

2. Underpinning research

Fitzjohn has undertaken a broad range of research on houses and households in the ancient Greek world (from the Iron Age to the Classical periods). Fitzjohn’s work on the archaeology of Greek houses in Greece and Italy explores ideas on the economics of house construction, embodied learning, and the role of bodily practices on identity formation. His research also explores architecture to understand ancient Greeks’ expression of cultural identity and social organisation [3.1], perceptions of landscape and temporality [3.2, 3.4], and the experiences of habitation [3.3]. Three key findings from Fitzjohn’s research are the starting point for this impact pathway:

First, our comprehension of life in Ancient Greece is richer if we understand how individuals, households and communities organised themselves to design and construct the houses in which they lived, rather than only seeing them as the spaces in which activities took place [3.1, 3.2, 3.4]. Fitzjohn has identified how the material expression of identities can be seen in domestic structures. He argues that the evidence of hybrid forms of existence as expressed through material culture represent different forms of identity expression and equality that were experienced across Sicily in the Archaic period.

Second, recent years have witnessed a significant interest in the identification of patterns of tasks and the short time scales of everyday life. To date, however, in the field of classical archaeology there have been few attempts to explore patterns of activities in the ancient Greek world and how these patterns may have constructed a sense of place. Fitzjohn’s research on house construction in several Greek sites from mainland Greece to the Western Mediterranean explores economic activity and landscape perception. Informed by concepts of lived space and the rhythms of daily, seasonal and annual tasks, and offers a more nuanced appreciation of life in the ancient Mediterranean. Publications 3.2 and 3.4 explore these arguments to present a new understanding of Archaic Megara Hyblaea, a Greek settlement located in eastern Sicily, which, due to its location, history and level of preservation, has been central to discussions of urbanization, agriculture and identity in the ancient Greek world.

Third, in Ancient Greece, daily life and experiences in the home caused bodily transformations that affected people’s quality of life and altered perceptions of self, as well as economic productivity in the household. [3.3]. Fitzjohn’s research enhances our understanding of the quality of life in ancient Greece by moving from focusing on statistics of floor space and construction costs to an evaluation of health and wellbeing of the household. The novelty of this approach lies in combining archaeological evidence for cooking and heating in the ancient Greek home with new non-archaeological research from the disciplines of medicine and public health, (as well as data from experimental archaeology), to reconstruct physical wellbeing in the past, a key criterion in classifications of quality of life. Fitzjohn’s reinterpretations of vernacular buildings bring to the fore issues of wellbeing and embodiment in order to enhance the ways that archaeologists and ancient historians examine quality of life in the ancient world.

3. References to the research

3.1 Fitzjohn, M., 2007. Equality in the colonies: concepts of equality in Sicily during the eighth to six[th] centuries BC. World Archaeology 39: 215-228 [Available from the University on request]

3.2 Fitzjohn, M., 2013. Bricks and mortar, grain and water: tracing tasks and temporality in Archaic Sicily. World Archaeology 45: 624-641 [Available from the University on request]

3.3 Fitzjohn, M., 2013. Hearth and home: evaluating quality of life in the ancient Greek world. In: Building, dwelling, and living in the ancient Greek world. Online working paper and REF14 submission https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/14673/

3.4 Fitzjohn, M., 2015. The economics of house construction and the temporality of daily life: Quantifying Construction Practices to understand Economic Organisation, Time and Space in Archaic Megara Hyblaea. 133-142. In Di Castro, A.A., C.A. Hope & B.E. Parr (eds), Housing and Habitat in the Ancient Mediterranean. Cultural and Environmental Responses (Babesch Supplement 26), Peeters: Leuven. [REF 2014 submission. Available from the University on request]

4. Details of the impact

Fitzjohn’s research-based classroom resources (over 70 documents) have enhanced content and supported teachers to deliver curriculum on Ancient Greece to thousands of children in England. The history of Ancient Greece is a topic in the National Curriculum (KS2) [5.2b] but there is no statuary guidance on how to teach the subject ( https://tinyurl.com/y6n7nug8). Consultation indicated that few primary teachers had adequate knowledge or resources to teach Ancient Greece [5.4e]. Use of Grand Designs resources has significantly increased the content and teaching time devoted to daily life in Ancient Greece, and has transformed teaching and student experience in primary and secondary schools. A-level teachers at Blackpool Sixth have said “Fitzjohn’s research has proved extremely beneficial for staff and students. The project supports the curriculum, further promotes engagement with the subject and is a valuable tool for the classroom” [5.1d]. The Headteacher of Kempsey Primary School believes “The impact and implications of his research will be with us for many years to come” [5.4e].

Embedded image

In 2016-2017, Fitzjohn began collaborating with 14 teachers and approximately 800 students in 8 partner schools (in Merseyside, Yorkshire, the Midlands and Sussex). Since then, c.800-1000 students each year have used Grand Designs resources, and an increasing number of teachers (average 8 per year) have used them. Since 2018-2019, the project has collaborated with 12 more schools (in Yorkshire and the northwest), and has provided events and training workshops in Blackpool, Leeds, Cardiff and Belgrade, Serbia [5.10], enabling hundreds of additional teachers to enrich their curriculum and teaching practice, transforming the learning experience of thousands of students.

Enriching curriculum content

Fitzjohn’s research on construction provided the building blocks for one of the key themes in Grand Designs’ classroom activities. Fitzjohn’s use of architectural energetics [3.2, 3.4] inspired the design of activities in which pupils use LEGO to learn-through-play about house construction in Ancient Greece [5.10i]. The Headteacher of Patcham Junior School has stated “Teaching of history has been enhanced with the use of LEGO as it... gave learners a tactile stimulus whilst learning about Ancient Greek dwellings and other structures of historical interest.” [5.8c]. Learners use LEGO to build miniature Greek houses and household mosaics, to learn about how ancient houses were built, and to explore properties of materials and methods of construction [3.1, 3.2, 3.4]. At Dobcroft Junior School, teachers believe “The combination of archaeology, art, maths and LEGO is fabulous.” [5.3b]. These cross-curricular materials successfully blend the arts and STEM curricula, including History, Maths, English and ITC. “The Mosaic Maker resources really inspired younger pupils and provided discrete cross-curricular links with numeracy” [5.5d].

Embedded image

Transforming teaching practice

Visualisation using IT and physical materials is a strong theme in both Fitzjohn’s research [3.1] and the teaching resources provided to teachers [5.10i]. At Liverpool College, Classics teachers have been inspired to develop methods for revising A-level literature modules, by asking pupils to display a scene or character from the Aeneid [5.6c]. Visualisation activities are highly successful with secondary school pupils and support attainment. Fitzjohn’s resources have been “an incredibly useful tool to further consolidate learning of the ancient world” [5.1d], prompting teachers to make alterations to their teaching in broader topic lessons [5.6c]. They have been used “to compliment the literary aspects of the Ancient History course and allowed us to explore aspects of Greek culture in a highly original and engaging way.” [5.1d] . The resources “encourage some colleagues to try out different teaching strategies out of their preferred comfort zones” and they have inspired Latin teachers to develop “more creative approaches to vocabulary learning with Year 7 pupils” at King Henry VIII School [5.5c] and Year 8 pupils in Liverpool College [5.6c].

Fitzjohn’s research has directly inspired primary teachers to shift from traditional, single-topic teaching and integrate themes across the curriculum, blending History with ITC and English storytelling with Geography and Maths [5.2c, 5.2d, 5.4c, 5.8c]. Teachers have used LEGO models as the context for constructing narrative and learning about the past, combining History and English subjects [5.2c, 5.4e, 5.8c]. Grand Designs resources and activities have not only influenced the teaching of Ancient Greece but also topics such as “The Great Fire of London... and in Geography, pupils were inspired to use the LEGO to construct volcanoes.” [5.4e]. The use of LEGO to scaffold learning particularly supports SEND pupils “as inspiration for their writing.” [5.8c], and supported “...concentration and engagement with their learning...[for] children who might normally have been turned off during the lesson” [5.4e]. “Dr Fitzjohn's activities were particularly useful to support some of our SEND pupils and those more reluctant writers when used in English and topic work. One boy wrote an extended story using a LEGO story starter. Mr Hands...was really delighted by this achievement” [5.4e]. In Secondary Schools, the project has led teachers of Philosophy, Religion, Ethics (PRE) & Computing to utilise Lego and playful learning to create activities that help students to visualise abstract concepts and ideas [5.5c].

Improving student engagement

Use of the resources has increased pupil engagement [5.2c, 5.4e, 5.6c, 5.7b, 5.8c]; teachers believe that they are an “Absolutely FANTASTIC resource to use with pupils” [5.10e]. “[Pupils] really enjoyed the topic work and seem to have benefited from learning through play” [5.4e]. The resources encourage “patterns of collaboration” and “performance with factual recall” [5.5c], and “have engaged reluctant learners and really provided a level of depth to classroom discussion” [5.1d]. Pupil feedback indicates that 84% learnt a lot about life in Ancient Greece, 80% enjoyed the activities and half of them would like to learn more [5.4f]. At Kempsey, “Year 5 pupils, who had previously used Lego in their Ancient Greek lessons to plan and build Greek dwellings had transferred this knowledge to construct Mayan Temples. During their Independent Learning Opportunities these pupils were able to discuss the similarities and differences between Mayan and Greek civilizations” [5.4e]. Year 8 pupils have been so inspired by Grand Designs resources that they are creating activities which will be used in local primary schools as part of the Roman Coventry 2021 project. A teacher at Coventry reported that “Fitzjohn's Team meeting and resources on mosaics for primary schools was influential in giving the [Y8] Team a direction...The Team is incredibly motivated...They work on this outside regular lessons and parents have responded incredibly positively about their children's enthusiasm during Parents' Evening.” [5.5e]. During the 2020 closure of Kempsey primary school the Headteacher reported that “a number of children...turned to LEGO for some of their learning activities. One boy even created a fantastic LEGO story based on Beowulf which he filmed and sent to his class teacher. This was clearly because of work he had done in previous years and his enthusiasm for the story and his learning was clearly enhanced by his use of LEGO and his feeling that it was “ok” to learn this way” [5.4e].

Reshaping pedagogy beyond project partners

As a result of the success in schools, in 2019 Fitzjohn was invited to develop the primary (KS2) Classics Hub at Blackpool Sixth Form College [5.1]. At a workshop one teacher “went away feeling inspired and motivated to incorporate his hard work into my teaching... I will definitely be using Dr Fitzjohn's resources in the future as they are not only extremely helpful but also very well put together and easy to use.” [5.1d]. The project has also inspired teaching practice for language teachers in the UK and in Europe. In 2019, after working with teachers at Cathays High School in Cardiff [5.10a], Fitzjohn was invited to present a conference workshop on using the resources to teach languages [5.10b], where the Head of ELTA Serbia “identified great potential in combining your work and second language acquisition” [5.10c]. Following an invitation to deliver a plenary speech and workshop at an international English Language Teachers conference in Belgrade, 96% of the participants (total 25) stated that they would like to use these materials in their teaching [5.10c]. Project resources have been available on Times Education Supplement website since 2018. They have received over 1,174 views, and 8,740 resources have been downloaded [5.10e]. Download peaks followed workshops at Cardiff, Serbia and Leeds in 2019, indicating engagement and intended use of the resources [5.10b,5.10c, 5.10d]. 5* reviews state that “students became engaged and enthusiastic”, and teachers “have recommended them to partner schools in our Academy Trust.” In 2020, the resources also “helped me to support my son learn about Greece during lockdown... It was a really interesting way to bring history to life for an 8 year old boy” [5.10e].

In 2020, Fitzjohn was invited to develop a series of workshops on his innovative cross-curricular teaching practices for trainee and newly qualified teachers at the University of Brighton (delayed until 2021 due to Covid) [5.10f]. Brighton’s Department of Education works with over 300 schools, and its online resources reach 3,500 schools, creating enormous potential to expand the Grand Designs project and influence the teaching of Ancient Greece and related subjects in primary and secondary schools in England. Online and in-person events are planned to take place in 2021 [5.10f].

5. Sources to corroborate the impact

5.1 Blackpool Sixth. (Includes: a. Information; b. Participating schools; c. Emails; d. Testimonial; e. Classics For All; f. Flexible Faculty Fund)

5.2 Carfield Primary School. (Includes: a. Information; b. Participation letter; c. Testimonial; d. School newsletter; e. Year 3 curriculum; f. Ancient Greek pottery; g. Adventures of Perseus; h. Excellent Excavation; i. Homework project)

5.3 Dobcroft Junior School. (Includes: a. Information; b. and c. Emails; d. Student feedback; e. Archaeologists Day; f. Twitter; g Week of Archaeology)

5.4 Kempsey Primary School. (Includes: a. Information; b. Participation letter; c. Email; d. School Governor’s report; e. Testimonial; f. Student feedback; g. Mosaics; h. Mysterious Mayans)

5.5 King Henry VIII School. (Includes: a. Information; b. Participation letter; c. Emails; d. Testimonial; e. Email; f. Newsletter; g. Twitter)

5.6 Liverpool College. (Includes: a. Information; b. Participation letter; c. Testimonial)

5.7 Ormskirk West End Primary School. (Includes: a. Information; b. Review; c. Video tour; d. Excellent Excavation; e. Twitter)

5.8 Patcham Schools. (Includes: a. Information; b. Participation letter; c. Testimonial; d. Ancient Greeks; e. Excavation timelines; d. Grand Designs models)

5.9 Priory School. (Includes: a. Information; b. Participation letter; c. Email; d. Classroom slides; e. Grand Designs; f. Assessment questions)

5.10 Additional Evidence. (Includes: a. Cathays High School, Cardiff; b. Cultural Threads Conference, Cardiff; c. ELTA Conference, Belgrade; d. Celebrating Education Conference, Leeds; e. Times Educational Supplement; f. Teacher training, Brighton; g. Potential partners; h. Atkinson Museum, Southport; i. Grand Designs in Ancient Greece)

Submitting institution
The University of Liverpool
Unit of assessment
15 - Archaeology
Summary impact type
Cultural
Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
No

1. Summary of the impact

University of Liverpool research into the development of an important but previously unknown early sedentary and farming community, has been carried out 2006-present at the site of Boncuklu in Konya, the largest province in Turkey. Our research has enabled Konya Museums to protect the site, enhanced their curatorial activity, and facilitated the development of a major permanent exhibition in a newly planned archaeology museum. Teachers and the municipality indicate that we have enhanced local educational provision substantially. We have contributed directly to the creation and production by documentary makers and other media of films and articles about Boncuklu which have a wide reach (e.g. National Geographic circulation 6,100,000). With thousands of visitors from 23 countries, feedback indicates that we have transformed this group’s understanding of Neolithic heritage.

2. Underpinning research

The University of Liverpool Boncuklu project is directed by Baird, who holds the excavation permit from the Turkish government and is supported by 5 other colleagues from Liverpool: Asouti, Kabukcu, Pearson, Haddow (Archaeology), and Chiverell (Geography – as part of the interdisciplinary aspects of our research). Baird directs, orchestrates and integrates the work of 31 researchers from the Universities of Ankara, Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli, Bournemouth, Copenhagen, Cornell, Harvard, Leiden, Middle Eastern Technical University, Oxford, Peking, Queensland, Reading, UCL and the British Museum. Excavations have been carried out over 14 seasons, from 2006 to 2019 and the 2020 season was interrupted by COVID19. The project is based next to the village of Hayıroğlu, 40km from the city of Konya, 10km north of World Heritage site of Çatalhöyük.

The project has identified key research outcomes which have featured in the Konya Museums exhibition design, education materials for local schools, in our on-site visitor information and presentation, in documentaries, in magazine articles and in blogs by ancient DNA enthusiasts, notably:

the earliest sedentary and farming communities in central Anatolia (3.2 and 3.6),

the factors involved in the spread of farming to the area (3.2 and 3.6),

the development and transformation of small-scale food production (3.6),

human-environment interactions during the early Holocene and in relation to the development of farming (3.2 and 3.6)

the inter-relationships of ritual, symbolism and the appearance of sedentism in the area (3.1 and 3.6),

genetic continuity of these Neolithic farmers from the Epipalaeolithic communities of the area (REF output),

features of the kinship structures of these early households from ancient DNA,

understanding of health and disease in these early farming communities

the emergence of animal herding, both in terms of animal management practices and the appearance of genetic domestication using ancient DNA (3.6).

the antecedents of the internationally renowned World Heritage site of Çatalhöyük, helping us understand the social arrangements facilitating major community growth and elaborate ritual and symbolism seen at that site (3.1, 3.2 and 3.6).

The Boncuklu excavations and related research in which the Liverpool team has been central has resulted in 48 papers and 9 PhD theses. Many of the publications are in internationally peer reviewed journals, many of an interdisciplinary character, including Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nature communications, Current Biology, Proceedings Royal Society B, World Archaeology, Cambridge Archaeological Journal, Environmental Archaeology, Anatolian Studies and Journal of Archaeological Science.

The project has been supported through a series of large research grants from competitive funding bodies including 1 British Academy Research Development Award, 3 National Geographic grants, 2 Australian Research Council discovery awards, 1 Leverhulme large research grant, 1 AHRC large research grant and a Wenner-Gren grant. Our PhD projects have been funded by prestigious and competitive funding sources including AHRC (3), Australian Research Council (3), University of Liverpool (1), Turkish Education Ministry (1), all of these co-supervised by Baird.

3. References to the research

3.1 Baird, D, Fairbairn, A, and Martin, L 2016 The animate house, the institutionalisation of the household in Neolithic central Anatolia World Archaeology 49(5), 753-776. [REF output] DOI: 10.1080/00438243.2016.1215259

  1. Baird, D, Fairbairn, A, Martin, L and Middleton, C 2012 The Boncuklu Project; the origins of sedentism, cultivation and herding in central Anatolia in Ozdogan, M and Bașgelen N eds Neolithic in Turkey new excavations, new discoveries. 219-244. Arkeoloji v Sanat Yayinlari, Istanbul. [Available from the university on request]

  2. Kilinc, G. M., Omrak, A., Ozer, F., Gunther, T. Buyukkarakaya, A. M., Bicakci, E., Baird D. and Götherström, A. 2016 The Demographic Development of the First Farmers in Anatolia. Current Biology, 26(19), 2659-2666. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.07.057

  3. Fletcher, A, Baird D, Spataro M, Fairbairn, A 2017 The order of things, earliest ceramics in Anatolia Cambridge Archaeological Journal 27/2, 351-369. DOI: 10.1017/S0959774316000767

  4. Kılınç, G, Koptekin, D, Atakuman, Ç, Sümer, A, Dönertaş, H, Yaka, R, Bilgin, C, Büyükkarakaya, A, Baird, D, Altinisik, E, Götherström, A, Togan, İ, Some,l M, 2017 Archaeogenomic analysis of the first steps of Neolithisation in Anatolia and the Aegean, Proceedings of the Royal Society B 284 20172064. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2017.2064

  5. Baird, D, Fairbairn, A, Jenkins, E, Martin, L, Middleton, C, Pearson, J, Asouti, E, Edwards, Y, Kabukcu, C, Mustafaoğlu, G, Russell, N, Bar-Yosef, O, Jacobsen, G, Wu, X, Baker, A, Elliott, S 2018 Agricultural origins on the Anatolian plateau. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115 (14) E3077-E3086 [REF output] www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1800163115

4. Details of the impact

Beneficiary: Konya Museums

The Boncuklu project has been carried out in close partnership with the Konya Museums who have been a major beneficiary (5.1). Konya Museums is part of the Turkish Ministry of Culture, operates the museum services of Konya city and province and oversees all archaeology in this region. Konya is Turkey’s 7th largest city. Konya Museums include the second most visited museum in Turkey.

Site preservation: Konya Museums have responsibility for the protection of regional archaeological sites, including Boncuklu. Through our intervention, the site is now regularly monitored, and damage by soil extraction has been prevented. Konya Museums Director Ömer Faruk Turkan confirms, “Baird’s work at Boncuklu Höyük led to the identification and protection of this archaeological site, as well as directed the attention of large numbers of the public to it.” (5.1). The project also convinced local villagers to protect their heritage. One noted in 2017, “we the residents of Hayıroğlu lived for years without knowing the history while we are living in the village. And, unfortunately we destroyed some of it without realising. I thank people from Liverpool University ….. who discovered this history” (5.2 #103).

Curatorial activity: Our research had a direct impact upon Konya Museums’ curatorial activity and exhibition development. We provided a collection of Boncuklu artifacts and detailed information relating to their significance, contributed directly to the design and content of a substantial, permanent exhibition, and helped to design a replica Neolithic mudbrick building, which will take pride of place in Konya’s new multi-million-pound archaeological museum. The Konya Museums Director stated, “this research comprises the basis for our creation of a suitably informed exhibition dedicated to the Neolithic Boncuklu Höyük ..…. in the new Konya Archaeology Museum that we are establishing over the next few years. Also, the information about the Boncuklu Höyük discoveries, that will be exhibited in the new museum, was provided by the project to the museum staff ...” (5.1).

Museum outreach: We have directly enhanced the Konya Museums education resources and outreach through the building of a Visitor Centre at Boncuklu in 2013 with the development during 2014-2019 of the permanent display and reconstruction of Neolithic houses and gardens, all funded by Boncuklu Project resources. These developments led to a 185% increase in visitor numbers to the Centre since 2013 (now interrupted by COVID19) with visitors commenting positively on their enhanced understanding (5.2).

Capacity building: The on-site visitor complex is manned by 2 permanent Museums staff who guide visitors. These staff, who had no previous knowledge of archaeology, were trained by the Boncuklu Project team who advised on site presentation details to impart to visitors. Visitor feedback attests to the success of our training, 46% singled out and praised staff effectiveness in communicating information about our research leading to enhanced visitor understanding of the Neolithic, e.g. “Mustafa, the officer here… attention and guidance was very good. We learned some information about the excavation works. We felt the depths of history in our souls” (5.2 #355).

Impact on local educational provision

Turkish primary and secondary school curricula require visits to sites of historical importance. Our Visitor Centre and its trained guides, draws frequent visits from local schools to the site. This has enhanced delivery of the syllabus through these regular local teacher-led visits, as indicated by a principal of the closest primary school (5.3). We have also made our research accessible through a graphical children’s booklet (also online), 2000 hard copies were distributed to all local schools and visiting school parties. These resources have led to an enhancement of teaching attested by a local school principal who says “The teachers and students have found it very useful to have this information and these resources provided by the Boncuklu project” (5.3), as well as the Konya Museums Director, who states that “these municipalities consider the project as …. as a successful educational investment for the local schools” (5.1), also echoed by the mayor of the local municipality Karatay-Konya (which covers a quarter of Konya province – the biggest in Turkey) – “your project has also contributed to the educational resources of the regional schools within the borders of our municipality.” (5.10). Usefulness of these resources is directly attested by teachers on their visits, exemplified by a secondary school teacher who visited with pupils from Konya and used our online material. When directly interviewed by us (11/8/17) he stated: “archaeological approach taken at Boncuklu is significant as it helps to reveal the way people lived rather than just identifying ‘treasures’” and “the (children’s) booklet is useful as a teaching device.”

Teachers from a visit 21/6/19 by Hayıroğlu primary school emphasized the value for their pupils: “…Boncuklu Höyük, where is one of the world's most important excavation sites in our own neighbourhoods Turkey. We were very impressed by what we saw here. Examining, researching and learning about a region where human beings lived in the past made us think about our ancestors and questioning the place where we came from” (5.2 #264). Three local children on another school trip said the following: “We are 11 years old. It caught my attention that it was before Çatalhöyük, even 1000 years earlier. Houses and graves before my Prophet caught my attention.” 30/7/19 (5.2 #324)

Enhanced understanding of the importance of, and, the Turkish Neolithic: in the media; amongst ancient DNA amateur enthusiasts; and Turkish and international visitors to Boncuklu

Media: We have directly affected a number of media organisations, collaborating closely with the film makers of 4 documentaries and several popular science and history magazines, co-producing the stories about our research which were disseminated by these media organisations to reach wide audiences during the census period.

Magazines Current World Archaeology (May 2018, issue 88) (global circulation of c. 20,000), National Geographic, English version -February 2019 (global circulation 6,100,000) and subsequently several of its foreign language editions, including the Turkish, Aktuel Arkeoloji May 2019 (circulation c. 10,000) have featured Boncuklu research in newspaper, television and radio reports by at least 13 additional Turkish media organisations. We worked directly with the relevant organisations developing their stories by supplying information, relevant text, quotes and working with their production teams on site at Boncuklu. This includes the National Geographic team over 2 seasons who indicate the consequent quality of the Boncuklu reporting convinced National Geographic to run with the story, including amongst their foreign editions (5.8).

Our transformative effects on the documentary makers are illustrated by three examples:

‘Seeds/Tohum’ commissioned by the Delegation of the European Union to Turkey for 2018 European Year of Cultural Heritage, total audiences c. 100,000 from 6 special screenings in Turkey’s major cities and broadcasts on Youtube, CNN Turk, documentary channel IZ TV and by digital platform beIN CONNECT (5.5);

British Institute at Ankara documentary as part of their heritage awareness training programme in Turkey, undertaken by 8,357 people with an additional 1000 viewers on YouTube (5.6);

‘The Ancient history of Anatolia- the adventure of Neolithic from east to west’ was produced by the Intercultural Dialogue Program European Union Project and had 3 international premieres and public screenings (5.8) until interrupted by COVID19.

All the films were produced through close collaboration between Baird and the film directors, from initial conceptualisation of content, pre-filming interviews, detailed planning of the filming at Boncuklu, advice and review during editing. Our input directly contributed to creation and shaping of these films and thereby to their success (5.4, 5.5, 5.6, 5.9). Through them we also reached wide and diverse audiences in Turkey and affected attitudes in regard to Turkey’s Neolithic heritage (5.4, 5.5, 5.6)

Specialist audiences: Ancient DNA enthusiasts: a dedicated community of several hundred amateurs around the world blogs on developments in aDNA with several hundred thousand followers according to web analytics sources. They have absorbed our research results into their thinking about human populations and our work has generated intense debates. These include 5 blog sites: Gene Expression, Eurogenes (100,000 views per month), Population Genomics, Anthrogenica (400,000-600,000 views per month) and ancientDNAera. Over the census period there have been 26 posts about Boncuklu with c. 550 comments reflecting on issues from past migration and gene flow to skin pigmentation in the past. To take just one example, the Eurogenes blog (8/8/16) flagged our 2016 study of Boncuklu aDNA and received 85 comments including “Very cool stuff! Boncuklu is the earliest hunter-forager to Neolithic site.”(Source 5.7).

Visitors to Boncuklu: The increased reach over the census period is reflected in a 300% increase in visitor numbers between the 2014-2018 period (400-500 per year) and 2019 (1,624 visitors) (as monitored by Museums staff on site), matched by visitor book entries (5.2); more were expected in 2020, shown by 300 visitors in January and February 2020, in the cold season for visiting in central Turkey. The uplift directly relates to the enhanced facilities we created and the profile our research created in the documentaries and magazines, matching the timeline of their dissemination (see above). Lockdown in March 2020 interrupted this continuing promising trend. The project has attracted from 23 countries, including many from Turkey outside Konya province. The site visitor books with 424 detailed records (5.2) best monitor this impact on this broad spectrum of the 10,000s of people affected by our research. Of this feedback 72% specifically commented on how the visit changed their knowledge/understanding of the significance of Neolithic/prehistoric heritage (5.2). In addition, many visitors felt our research helped them understand better the World Heritage site of Çatalhöyük. “It was fascinating to hear about the details of your work here and the connections with Çatalhöyük” 21/7/19 (5.2 #180).

Visitors have stressed how we have changed their understanding of life in the Neolithic: “I got a new insight into structured living practices and the obvious respect and ritualised nature of burials” 6/9/15 (5.2 #69). “Wonderful insight into Neolithic life” 2/11/18 (5.2 #123). “Examples of the transition from hunter gathering to the settled life from the Neolithic era were brought to life at this site for us” 7/6/19 (5.2 #247). People reflect on how we share information about the Neolithic with great effect: “The … museum structure presents a very effective description” 11/5/19 (5.2 #238). “We are very impressed by the educational display and the models” 10/9/19 (5.2 #192). “We liked the idea of the Neolithic garden. It really visualized things in our minds” 11/9/19 (5.2 #423). We conclude with a quote that neatly sums up the understanding of this heritage that we have achieved in these publics through the popular articles, documentaries and the Boncuklu visitor experience. “These remains belong to the common ancestors of humanity” 8/9/19 (5.2 #412).

5. Sources to corroborate the impact

5.1 Letter from Director of Konya Museums Ömer Faruk TÜRKAN, 10/9/19. Ministry reference: 34068228-160.01.02-E.738555

  1. Boncuklu Visitor Book entries accompanied by some summary information.

  2. Letter from principal of Hayıroğlu primary school regarding benefit to local education.

  3. Feedback from EU team leader for SEEDS/TOHUM documentary project.

  4. Feedback from Director of the documentary SEEDS/TOHUM

  5. Feedback from British Institute At Ankara documentary producer.

  6. Composite of example aDNA blogs illustrating the way our work has stimulated considerable thought and modelling of ancient population genetic composition amongst these amateurs.

  7. Feedback from National Geographic journalist and photographer relating to co-production of National Geographic article.

  8. Feedback from Directors of documentary ‘The Ancient History of Anatolia.

  9. Letter from mayor of Karatay-Konya municipality.

Submitting institution
The University of Liverpool
Unit of assessment
15 - Archaeology
Summary impact type
Cultural
Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
No

1. Summary of the impact

Most historic burial monuments have at best had only inscriptions recorded, and these are rarely archived. Very few have their archaeological attributes recorded, despite being important heritage assets that are deteriorating through erosion and mismanagement, with many threatened by church redundancy and reuse. Mytum’s research has highlighted the above- and below-ground archaeological potential of historic burial grounds and has provided updated data recording and, for the first time, systems for archiving and analysis to enable effective monument recording. Mytum’s historic mortuary archaeology research (coffins and fittings and memorials) has led to changes in professional practice by heritage practitioners, Diocesan Advisory Committees, and community groups.

2. Underpinning research

Mytum has researched burial grounds and their memorials throughout the period, conducting primary fieldwork in the UK, Republic of Ireland and Australia [3.1, 3.2]. The research demonstrates the changes in style and materials of commemorative monuments in graveyards and cemeteries over time and over space at the scale of the burial ground, the region, nationally, and internationally. It explores issues of identity and religion, development of production workshops and the shift from craft to mass production, and the ways in which the formalisation of burial grounds with coffins, vaults and memorials formed part of the improvement mentality of the 18th and 19th centuries. Through a combination of detailed contextual studies and wider comparative analyses using data from several countries and indeed globally, Mytum has brought insights from mortuary data to current research themes in historic and post-medieval archaeology.

Research into coffins and their fittings, mortsafes for body protection and comparing coffin decoration with that of memorials, led to a co-edited volume with 4 chapters by Mytum as sole or co-author [3.4]. This volume considers for the first time the development of historic coffins and fittings within an international comparative context and is the first substantial publication on historic below-ground mortuary material culture beyond the single-site monograph, involving the leading researchers in the UK, USA and Australia [3.4]. Mytum also led the development of Reflectance Transformation Imaging (RTI) in graveyard recording and other historical archaeology artefact categories [3.5]. This method of merging numerous photographs with different lighting direction allows the creation of an interactive image that enhances identification of text, imagery and carving techniques. Use of RTI can remove the need for the taking of potentially damaging rubbings of memorials.

Mytum also extended his activity into applied research, successfully winning the competitive bid within the Cemeteries and Churchyards in section 4D2 of the National Heritage Protection Plan 2011-2015 [5.1]. In this Historic England project, Mytum evaluated the status of physical and digital burial ground recording and their integration within Historic Environment Records (HERs) across England (project 6358). This research identified the limitations of previous recording and the lack of archived records, particularly digital sources, and proposed policies to improve archiving and access [3.6]. This led Historic England to fund a further project Discovering England’s Burial Spaces (DEBS): Enabling new forms of community engagement through digital experience (Historic England project 7533, via University of York), “DEBS is a direct response to Mytum et al’s EH 6358 report” [5.2A, p.4] with Mytum as the team member to develop an enhanced recording system for burial ground monument and landscape recording and analysis [3.3] and, collaboratively, a digital archiving system through the Archaeology Data Service. The system enables new data to be entered and archived, but also the updating and entry of legacy data from previous surveys.

3. References to the research

3.1 Mytum, H. 2020 Commemoration and Improvement: Parramatta St. John’s Cemetery, New South Wales, in its context 1788 to c. 1840, The Antiquaries Journal 100, 374-407. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003581520000281 Peer reviewed.

3.2 Mytum, H. 2020 Forgetting and remembering: Scots and Ulster Scots memorials in eighteenth-century Ulster, and Pennsylvania and nineteenth-century New South Wales, in N. Evans and A. McCarthy (eds.) Death in the Diaspora: British and Irish Gravestones, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, 14-51. https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/3060665/ Also available as physical copy.

3.3 Mytum, H. 2019 Recording and Analysing Burial grounds advice documentation http://www.debs.ac.uk/, completely updating Mytum, H. 2000, 2002 Recording and Analysing Graveyards. Council for British Archaeology Practical Handbook in Archaeology 15 and intermediate versions of code sheets and recording form. Sections by Mytum:

Carrying out a project http://www.debs.ac.uk/carryingoutaproject.html ;

Recording http://www.debs.ac.uk/recording.html ;

Identifying Monument Types http://www.debs.ac.uk/monumenttypes.html ;

Photography and Additional Recording http://www.debs.ac.uk/photography.html ;

Making a Plan http://www.debs.ac.uk/planning.html ;

Interpreting Your Data http://www.debs.ac.uk/interpreting.html

Edited versions are also available at

https://www.caringforgodsacre.org.uk/resources/recording-memorials/ .

3.4 H. Mytum and L. Burgess (eds.) 2018 Death Across the Oceans. Archaeology of Coffins and Vaults in Britain, America and Australia, 75-93. Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press, Washington. ISBN 9781944466169. Peer reviewed. Available as physical copy.

3.5 Mytum, H. and J.R. Peterson 2018 The Application of Reflectance Transformation Imaging (RTI) in Historical Archaeology. Historical Archaeology 52(2), 489-503. Peer reviewed. Open access at doi:10.1007/s41636-018-0107-x

3.6 Mytum, H. 2015 A Project Brief for Developing Local Assessment Toolkits – a scoping study to look at developing a standard model for recording cemeteries and burial grounds. English Heritage [now Historic England] Project no. 6358 report. https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/3001175/

4. Details of the impact

Mytum’s research, and in particular the Discovering England’s Burial Spaces (DEBS) methodology [3.3], has led to significant changes in heritage policy and practice by national organisations and regional authorities with responsibility for the protection of burial grounds. Mytum’s methods of recording and analysing burial grounds have also been adopted by major commercial archaeology units for large-scale excavation projects in England [3.3, 3.4]. By working with local community groups and charities, Mytum’s research has helped to change the way in which communities appreciate and care for their local heritage.

National and regional policy and practice

Mytum’s recording system [3.3] has been adopted by the Advisory Panel on the Archaeology of Burials in England (Historic England and the Church of England) in providing “comprehensive guidelines covering treatment of human remains and associated artefacts and grave markers” [5.2C,1], notably “Dealing with gravestones” [5.2C,39]. The Church of England Head of Church Buildings Strategy states that Mytum’s system “for the CBA and with support from the DEBS project for recording burial monuments in churchyards has been adopted by the Church of England as the national professional standard” [5.2D, 3.3]. This is applied by all Diocesan Advisory Committees (DACs), local authorities and field archaeologists. The British Association of Biological Anthropology and Osteoarchaeology recommends Mytum’s methodology [3.3] for recording non-skeletal funerary remains: “Mytum’s publications have been invaluable to us in the creation of these professional standards” [5.2C, 3.3, 3.4].

Mytum’s recording system [3.3] is now accepted practice by numerous regional organisations. For example, the Derby (DAC) and Peak District National Park Authority Archaeologist advises the use of Mytum’s methodology for graveyard projects in the Peak District [5.3B]. The County Durham HER Officer notes that the methodology is used as “standard” in Planning Conditions [5.3B], and that DEBS will be used to archive legacy data from previous graveyard recording projects [5.3A]. The Secretary of York DAC notes that Mytum’s recording methods are now standard policy “ in all cases where archaeological implications of any changes are identified” [5.3A], so contractors must ensure that “coffin fittings are recorded alongside human remains, that memorials are suitably recorded before movement, and that conservation works are fit for purpose” [3.3, 3.4, 3.5]. With approximately 20 applications per year, this has protected heritage assets including coffins and gravestones that otherwise would have degraded or been damaged through incorrect management, including several examples identified by the York DAC Church Buildings Advisor [5.3B].

Commercial archaeology

There are 2 multi-million-pound excavation and conservation projects currently taking place at Hull Holy Trinity burial ground and at Hull Minster. York DAC Church Buildings Advisor notes that, “In both these projects memorials and below-ground burial archaeology have been significant considerations in the design and implementation of works, and Harold Mytum’s research experience has enabled him to recommend modifications to both archaeological briefs and the Written Statements of Investigation (WSI) required for excavation and memorial recording which were adopted by the DAC, form part of the approval conditions, and are implemented by the contractors” [5.3B].

The Senior Project Manager for the Holy Trinity excavations states: “ Mytum's research has been influential not only on our systems for surveying and recording the burial monuments and coffin remains, but also in the manner that we propose to interpret the full suite of archaeological remains” [5.6B, 3.1, 3.3, 3.4]. The Head of Heritage Burial Services at major archaeological unit Oxford Archaeology notes that “ An important part of this work is your research [noting 3.3, 3.4]. This research enables us to analyse and interpret our data more effectively. In fact, it is the industry standard for the work we do” [5.6A, 3.3].

The Operations and Volunteer Assistant at the Coffin Works, Birmingham, states this “ is a time capsule museum preserving the Newman Brothers coffin furniture manufactory [and] Harold Mytum’s chapters [in 3.4] … are a really valuable resource … and were used by myself and other members of the team for research and volunteer training” [5.6C].

Community heritage: managing and preserving graveyards

Caring for God’s Acre (CfGA) is a national charity supporting people to investigate, care for, and enjoy burial grounds ( www.caringforgodsacre.org.uk/about-us) [5.5B]. The CfGA Director notes a change in CfGA policy due to Mytum’s research: “you discussing cultural history… has been really influential”, and “we now include volunteer activities around monument recording.” [5.5C, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3] Mytum provided downloadable resources for recording for CfGA the website [5.5A, 3.3], and CfGA used Mytum’s research in The Beautiful Burial Ground DVD for community groups planning churchyard management and recording [5.5A]. Through CfGA and HLF, Mytum led regional workshops on graveyard recording and management methods in Lincolnshire, Merseyside, Oxfordshire, Yorkshire, Limerick (Ireland), Enniskillen (Northern Ireland), Cardiff, and Bangor (Wales) [5.5B]. Mytum’s research and methodology [3.3], now promoted by CfGA, improves recording methods, increases the level of detail recorded, and enables permanently archived results with the DEBS system.

Mytum’s recording methodology [3.3] has already been employed by several community groups. CfGA leads “a heritage recording project in Birmingham (involving 5 cemeteries and funded by Historic England) inspired by your work” [5.5B, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.5]. Derby DAC Archaeological Advisor and Peaks National Park Archaeologist has “ used it several times as a professional and with various community groups, Young Archaeologists’ Clubs (YAC) etc.” [5.4, 3.3]. Leavesden Hospital History Association applied the methodology to “record 510 cremation markers and 30 monument headstones”, capturing data that had been lost for 60 years "due to many previous cemetery records being lost or destroyed over time" [5.8A, 3.3]. Embsay-with-Eastby Historical Research Group used it to survey 4 churchyards in the Yorkshire Dales and “promoted Harold’s approach to several other local community groups, encouraging them to adopt his model of gravestone analysis, and take their local studies beyond the simple collection of memorial inscriptions” [5.8B, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.5]. Meanwhile, the Spirit of Sutterby HLF project (Lincolnshire) has “already compiled the first draft of the Sutterby gravestones document” [5.7C]. By using Mytum’s methodology [3.3], these community organisations not only record their local heritage in greater detail than before, but can permanently add their records to the national archives through the DEBS system.

Using Mytum’s research methods [3.3] has led to greater community involvement in heritage. The Slingsby HLF report notes that recorders gained “new knowledge, new skills, new connections”, and “began to swap stories about ‘their’ stone, sharing discoveries and stories that led to other conversations not just about history, but also village life today” [5.7]. Slingsby Local History Group observed this was a “good way of getting church and non-church people to meet and reminding everyone in the village that the churchyard belongs to them” [5.8].1,500 positive social media comments attest to the important role of the Leavesden Hospital survey to "regenerate and restore this important part of local history for our community to remember and cherish" [5.8A]. One Embsay-with-Eastby survey participant said “I will never look at gravestones in the same way again. I only ever looked at what the inscriptions said” [5.8].

Particular contribution of the submitted unit's research and acknowledgement of other key research contributions:

The DEBS project: digital input, initial community training (T.Pillatt, N.Beale, University of York). Mytum created the recording protocols and the data spreadsheets to be converted to an on-line format by T.Pillatt. Mytum contributed to community training, provided case study exemplars, and wrote all advice materials for project planning and survey.

5. Sources to corroborate the impact

5.1 Mytum G Historic England Documentation.pdf

- Historic England (then English Heritage) statement of national priority in researching burial grounds: National Heritage Protection Plan 2013 extract 4D2, Cemeteries and Churchyards

5.2 Mytum G Best practice documents.pdf

- reports and professional best practice statements and emails showing Mytum’s research supporting industry-standard methods

5.2A Project 7533 Discovering England’s Burial Spaces (DEBS) Description (2017)

5.2B APABE 2017 Guidance for Best Practice for the Treatment of Human Remains Excavated from Christian Burial Grounds in England, pp 1, 39

5.2C Email from BABAO President, BABAO Code of Practice 2019

5.2D Email from the Head of Church Buildings Strategy, Church of England

5.3 Mytum G York DAC.pdf

- letters from Diocese of York professional staff regarding Mytum’s research directly affecting policy and practice across the diocese

5.3A York DAC Secretary

5.3B York DAC Church Buildings Advisor

5.4 Mytum G HER and DAC archaeologists.pdf

- emails from local authority archaeologists regarding Mytum’s research directly affecting their policy and practice

5.4A County Durham HER Officer

5.4B Peak District National Park Authority and Derby DAC archaeologist

5.5 Mytum G CfGA Officers.pdf

- emails from Caring for God’s Acre professional staff regarding Mytum’s research directly affecting policy and practice across CfGA policy and practice

5.5A CfGA Project Support Office

5.5B CfGA Communications and Development Manager

5.5C CfGA Director

5.6 Mytum G Commercial professional practice.pdf

- emails from commercial field and museum archaeologists regarding Mytum’s research directly affecting their practice and from

5.6A Head, OA Heritage Burial Services Historic mortuary archaeology

5.6B OA Senior Project Manager Hull excavations

5.6C Statement from Operations and Volunteer Assistant, The Coffin Works, Birmingham 2016-2019 and now working with CfGA

5.7 Mytum G HLF community projects.pdf

- reports and emails regarding Mytum’s research directly affecting activity and attitudes

5.7A Slingsby Training Evaluation Report for HLF

5.7B Study day on headstones at All Saints Church Slingsby, York

5.7C Spirit of Sutterby Workshop

5.8 Mytum G DEBS community projects.pdf

- reports and emails regarding Mytum’s research directly affecting activity and attitudes

5.8A Brooks Leavesden letter

5.8B Embsay DEBS feedback

Showing impact case studies 1 to 4 of 4

Filter by higher education institution

UK regions
Select one or more of the following higher education institutions and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No higher education institutions found.
Institutions

Filter by unit of assessment

Main panels
Select one or more of the following units of assessment and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No unit of assessments found.
Units of assessment

Filter by continued case study

Select one or more of the following states and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.

Filter by summary impact type

Select one or more of the following summary impact types and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.

Filter by impact UK location

UK Countries
Select one or more of the following UK locations and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No UK locations found.
Impact UK locations

Filter by impact global location

Continents
Select one or more of the following global locations and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No global locations found.
Impact global locations

Filter by underpinning research subject

Subject areas
Select one or more of the following underpinning research subjects and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No subjects found.
Underpinning research subjects