Impact case study database
Search and filter
Filter by
- York St John University
- 3 - Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
- Submitting institution
- York St John University
- Unit of assessment
- 3 - Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
- Summary impact type
- Societal
- Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
- No
1. Summary of the impact
Research at York St John University (YSJU) developing standardised assessments has changed occupational therapists’ practice to improve assessment and demonstrated benefits for older patients with conditions, such as stroke or dementia. The implementation of the Structured Observation Test of Function (SOTOF) and Activity Card Sort – United Kingdom (ACS-UK) improves clinicians’ understanding and awareness of patients’ problems and needs to inform goal setting and treatment planning. SOTOF enables occupational therapists to assess if older people have underlying perceptual, cognitive, motor, and/or sensory problems impacting their ability to undertake four personal activities of daily living (eating, drinking, washing, and dressing). SOTOF 2nd edition’s [3.4] graduated mediation protocol facilitates occupational therapists to identify the level of prompts and cues required to maximise independence and support rehabilitation or management. SOTOF aids patients’ insight into their functional problems and abilities. The ACS-UK [3.1] examines changes in engagement in personal and instrumental activities of daily living, leisure, social and cultural activities. ACS-UK improves therapists’ identification of activities that are reduced or given up by older people, aiding goal setting and person-centred intervention plans. It is particularly beneficial for people with speech impairments and/or memory problems, as the ACS-UK photograph activity-cards serve as memory prompts and can be sorted into categories non-verbally.
2. Underpinning research
Introduction: Dr Laver-Fawcett’s research related to occupational therapy assessments and outcome measures, conducted in the NHS and at universities in UK, USA, and Canada, has spanned 30 years. Laver-Fawcett’s (2007) key academic text Principles of Assessment and Outcome Measurement for Occupational Therapists and Physiotherapists: Theory, Skills and Application, is internationally used and cited. She has contributed 4 invited chapters on occupational therapy assessment (in two American, a UK, and an Australian textbook) and contributed an invited article for the Norwegian Journal of Occupational Therapy, Ergoterapeuten (2014), which highlighted the importance of occupational therapists using standardised outcome measurement in routine practice to evaluate treatment effectiveness. In addition to the research she has led at YSJU, which underpins the ACS-UK and SOTOF assessments, she contributed to the development of the Hopkins Rehabilitation Engagement Rating Scale - Reablement Version (HRERS-RV) and related psychometric research studies [3.6]. The HRERS-RV provides the first standardised measure of patient engagement for use in reablement services. It was used as an outcome measure in the National Institute of Health Research funded ‘Models of Reablement mixed methods evaluation of a complex intervention’ study (Beresford et al, 2019: https://doi.org/10.3310/hsdr07160).
The Activity Card Sort – United Kingdom version (ACS-UK) [3.1]: This assessment comprises a test manual, three scoring forms (for the Institutional, Recovery and Community versions), category sorting cards and 93 photograph activity cards. It may be administered by occupational therapists, other health and social care professionals or assistants, and activity co-ordinators in a wide range of settings including: hospitals; a patient’s home; care homes; or day centres. Research to develop [3.2] and evaluate [3.3] the ACS-UK has been funded through YSJU QR funding. A content validity study [3.2] was undertaken to identify culturally relevant activity items to be included in the United Kingdom (UK) ACS. Items were first generated using published UK time-use studies, research related to other country’s ACS versions, and occupational therapist experts’ opinions. A two-round survey of community-living older adults from across the UK (round 1, n = 177; round 2, n = 21) was used for item selection, clarifying the wording of activity labels, and agreeing activity domain classification; 91 activities were identified for the ACS-UK at this stage. The face validity and clinical utility study (n = 27 older participants) found that the ACS-UK had an acceptable mean administration and scoring time of 14.5 minutes [3.3]. Most participants found the ACS-UK straightforward, easy to do and considered activity labels clear. All participants reported that photograph-cards looked like the activities they were depicting. Following older participants’ feedback, 2 additional items (sleeping and doing jigsaws) were added with the final version now comprising 93 photographed activities [3.3]. Reliability studies indicated it has acceptable test-retest and inter-rater reliability [3.1].
The Structured Observation Test of Function (SOTOF): SOTOF, Laver-Fawcett’s PhD output, was originally published by NFER-Nelson (Laver and Powell, 1995) and is a standardised assessment, used by occupational therapists or students under supervision, with older patients. It assesses occupational performance in personal activities of daily living and associated neuropsychological problems. SOTOF’s 2nd edition [3.4], underpinned by research at YSJU (conducted from 2015), has been improved through the addition of a formalised dynamic assessment component comprising a 6-level graduated mediation protocol, mediation examples and related scoring method. The SOTOF 2nd edition’s content validity from the perspective of an international panel of experts [3.5], face validity and clinical utility with people with dementia, and a pilot test-retest reliability study with people with stroke, have been examined through research at YSJU [3.4]. In terms of clinical utility, the administration time was approximately 30 minutes which people with dementia considered reasonable and ‘the manual was extremely informative and guided [the test administrator] through the whole learning, administration and scoring process. Any questions … regarding certain deficits or scoring of the SOTOF were answered within the manual’; ‘…forms were very clear and self-explanatory’; it was ‘…straightforward to score and calculate’; and “SOTOF administration was a lot faster than anticipated”. The graduated mediation protocol was considered useful, easy to follow, and flexible to client need. Findings supported that the SOTOF identifies strengths and deficits to inform clinical reasoning and appropriate treatment plans, demonstrating the value of cues and prompts to maximise independence. Researchers reported SOTOF provided useful insight into deficits experienced by people with mild dementia (for example ideomotor apraxia) which may otherwise have been missed.
3. References to the research
[3.1] Laver-Fawcett, AJ (2019) The Activity Card Sort – United Kingdom version (ACS-UK): Test manual. York, York St John University [can be supplied by the HEI on request]
[3.2] Laver-Fawcett AJ, Mallinson S H (2013). Development of the Activity Card Sort - United Kingdom version (ACS-UK). Occupational Therapy Journal of Research ( OTJR): Occupation, Participation and Health, 33 (3), 134-145 . doi: 10.3928/15394492-20130614-02
[3.3] Laver-Fawcett AJ, Brain L, Brodie C, Cardy L, Manaton L (2016) The Face Validity and Clinical Utility of the Activity Card Sort – United Kingdom (ACS-UK). British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 79(8) 492–504. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0308022616629167
[3.4] Laver-Fawcett AJ, Marrison E (2016) The Structured Observational Test of Function. (2nd edition). York: York St John University [can be supplied by the HEI on request]
[3.5] Annis S, Piotrak P, Laver-Fawcett A (2017) To explore the content validity of the six-level mediation protocol developed for the Structured Observational Test of Function (2nd edition), from the perspective of an expert panel. Paper presentation. Royal College of Occupational therapists Annual Conference. Birmingham. Available from: https://ray.yorksj.ac.uk/id/eprint/2434/
[3.6] Mayhew EE, Beresford BB, Laver Fawcett A, Aspinal F, Mann R, Bechtold K and Kanaan M. (2019) The Hopkins Rehabilitation Engagement Rating Scale - Reablement Version (HRERS-RV): Development and Psychometric Properties. Health & Social Care in the Community . 27 (3). pp. 777-787. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12696
4. Details of the impact
Reach and pathways to impact: SOTOF and ACS-UK have been disseminated via: publications [3.2; 3.3]; Twitter; workshops delivered at YSJU; workshops delivered on request in 4 NHS Trusts: Hull Teaching Hospital NHS Trust and York Hospital NHS Foundation Trust [5.1] (SOTOF) and Leeds and York Partnership NHS Trust [5.6] and Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Trust [5.7] (ACS-UK and SOTOF); conference presentations at national (e.g. **[3.5]**) and European conferences; invited presentation at the OT Show (2019); a stand at the European Network of Occupational Therapists in Higher Education conference in Athens (2019); and invited teaching on SOTOF in Austria on the Master of Science in Ergotherapie, in Innsbruck (June 2015; including first SOTOF 2nd edition content validity study), and to occupational therapists at the Centre for the Rehabilitation for the Paralysed, Bangladesh (March 2017; SOTOF 2nd ed). Twitter is a successful strategy for dissemination, for example, a tweet (posted June 2020) led to 52 SOTOF requests from clinicians and students in England, Wales, Scotland, Turkey, USA, Philippines, and Australia. SOTOF also has been requested by occupational therapists in Singapore, New Zealand, Lithuania, Poland, and Canada. Some YSJU occupational therapy students introduced the SOTOF and/or ACS-UK on practice placements leading to clinicians requesting the assessments. QR funding was awarded for research in 2020 which could not be conducted owing to the COVID-19 pandemic, so instead YSJU provided funding to print additional ACS-UK copies which have been provided free to therapists in four NHS Trusts, one independent hospital, a care home and to academics in 3 Universities (who wish to teach the ACS-UK in their curricula). Laver-Fawcett has created two databases, one for each assessment, and when people receive a copy of SOTOF and/or purchase or request information about the ACS-UK, they are invited to join the relevant database. This is used to keep colleagues updated about assessment developments and to contact colleagues regarding further research or implementation evaluation. Currently the ACS-UK database comprises 72 colleagues and the SOTOF database 98 colleagues.
Structured Observation Test of Function (SOTOF)’s impact: SOTOF 2nd edition is published under a creative commons licence and available free of charge. It comprises a test manual, instruction protocols, record form and enlarge instructions for people with hearing deficits or benefitting from written instructions. Colleagues contact the 1st author to request a copy, this helps to ensure it is being used by people with occupational therapy qualifications. Two role-plays and an instructional PowerPoint are provided to aid learning to use SOTOF. A Senior Lecturer from St George’s, University of London reported how SOTOF and role-plays were used with occupational therapy students on placement: ‘We had a remote peer learning placement and as the students did not have much client interaction [owing to the pandemic] we gave them all the SOTOF files and they used them to role play the assessment together. They were able to navigate it all themselves and we watched the role play videos. They also reflected on using the assessment’ [5.3]. Feedback from occupational therapists who have attended SOTOF training workshops indicated SOTOF ‘…help[s] me identify patients’ rehab. potential and to support my clinical reasoning and be more person-centred’; and SOTOF assists with ‘…being able to track change and help with insight’ and provides ‘more accurate assessment of strengths and deficits to plan … interventions’ [5.9].
Poor insight into their level of disability can hamper patients’ engagement in rehabilitation, and stroke patients gained insight into their functional problems and abilities through doing SOTOF. One patient commented: “ I was shocked actually…I thought I could do a lot more than that…I didn’t follow them [SOTOF instructions] as straight as I thought I would’ (Participant 8). The impact of stroke can lead to low mood and it is important for patients to see progression and improvements, to maintain morale during rehabilitation, SOTOF demonstrated progress with their recovery to patients, for example: ‘Simple everyday tasks become a problem...and pouring the drink [SOTOF task 3] felt as though they were coming back’ (Participant 6). Patients reported doing the SOTOF was useful, interesting, and they learnt from doing it [5.1, feedback collected through semi-structured interviews with 10 patients ].
SOTOF’s ability to identify functional improvements was reported by staff for example: ‘ it was a good assessment really to show that they had moved on considerably from when they were first on the ward’. SOTOF was useful to inform treatment planning: ‘ The scores show so clearly… where their difficulties are. And then we could … get together a really good programme of treatment and therapy’. [ 5.1, stroke rehabilitation ward multi-disciplinary team’s view of SOTOF collected via survey n=8 and focus group n=11]. Marrison [5.1] reported that the SOTOF identified a patient had right / left discrimination problems which had not been discovered in previously undertaken functional or cognitive assessments and stated if SOTOF had not be undertaken the deficit may have gone unnoticed. Information generated from SOTOF informs other multi-disciplinary team professionals’ practice on the stroke rehabilitation ward [5.2], SOTOF results: ‘…inform treatment techniques or treatment interventions [so]… we could get together a better programme’.
An audit of dressing practice by occupational therapists in acute stroke settings (Worthington et al, 2020) [5.4] represented 70 (of 157) stroke units in England. The authors reported that only 23.3% of therapists ‘regularly used standardised assessments, or components of standardised assessments, when assessing dressing ability’ (p.667). The SOTOF (2nd edition) [3.1] was reported as the third most frequently used, of only five standardised assessments listed, by participants [5.4].
Laver-Fawcett (funded by Erasmus, 2016) provided a SOTOF workshop for occupational therapy Masters’ students at KU Leuven University, Belgium followed by teaching delivered virtually in 2017. A Professor at KU Leuven continues to refer to SOTOF in her teaching with occupational therapy students. This has led to the use of SOTOF by some Belgium occupational therapists. Following a request to translate the SOTOF into Dutch, a project to evaluate SOTOF’s use in practice was undertaken at Reepkaai in Belgium (with 10 neurological patients) leading to plans to implement it further in practice [5.8]. Identified SOTOF strengths included: the use of everyday objects and tasks recognised by patients; clear instructions; low cost of equipment; free assessment; that the therapist can use one test (instead of several tests); and administration can be spread over time (which helps when patients have fatigue). ‘ The dynamic element of the test provides extra information on learning or coaching style of patient, [and] effective cues…’ [5.8].
Activity Card Sort – United Kingdom (ACS-UK) impact: The ACS-UK is published by YSJU to keep costs affordable for NHS Trusts, local authorities, and care homes with limited budgets. It can be purchased from YSJU by contacting the 1st author and is printed by a local York based printers, to support the local economy. Evaluation of the implementation of ACS-UK into older people’s mental health services in two NHS Trusts [5.7] found the ACS-UK has: ‘ …been beneficial for service users who do not have language skills anymore… [with] our more advanced dementia service users that can still look at a visual cue and …works really well’. Clinicians reported the ACS-UK ‘definitely [provides] more information’ [compared to another assessment used previously] and ‘… it helped their partner get involved as well, they … did it together and they looked at things that they could work on together’. Some people with mental illness or dementia find it hard to identify meaningful activities, and the ACS-UK helps with this: ‘When I've used it, people have said “oh no, don't really have many hobbies or anything” …and … when you go through it, you find a plethora of things to do… also you build that great rapport with people and therapeutic relationship.’ The ACS-UK provides a: ‘…detailed account of what the person used to do, now does, how much etc, and also some of the reasoning - this makes it easier to consider [the therapists’] role and possibilities in enabling the person to engage’ [5.7]. ‘ In clinical practice with people with dementia the Activity Card Sort UK (ACS-UK) has been useful in terms of talking about activity, promoting communication that is meaningful and measuring activity participation/promoting ideas for new activities to add meaning to everyday life.’ [5.6]. Following the ACS-UK implementation and evaluation project, Tees, Esk and Wear valleys NHS Foundation Trust purchased 14 ACS-UK copies to use across the Trust.
Clinicians felt ACS-UK aids reminiscence, supports goal setting, helps clients to think about what they would like to do again, ‘tease[s] out information that may not normally be covered’; ‘focuses interventions in a client centred way’ and provides results which can be used ‘to increase care home staff awareness of what the person has done previously and how best to increase their meaningful engagement’ [5.9]. An occupational therapist summarised: ‘ I think it [ACS-UK] is helpful as we are not using much by way of standardised assessments or those that help formulate goals and monitor engagement as much. It will also help make sure we address all domains, as sometimes the focus can end up being on self-care. It will also help to work collaboratively and make sure the goals are ones shared / made by the person’ [5.7].
The ACS-UK was requested for a funded Valuing Active Life in Dementia (VALID) Randomised Controlled Trial which examined a community occupational therapy intervention for people with dementia and carers. Participants worked with an occupational therapist to identify meaningful activities and set appropriate intervention goals; ACS-UK was used to assist this as part of the intervention process (not used as an outcome measure). It was requested because some people with dementia struggled with the interview process and the ACS-UK activity cards, containing photographs of activities, serve as a memory prompt and could be sorted into categories without the person needing to respond verbally. The Occupational Therapist Clinical Researcher, based at the North East London Foundation Trust, commented ‘I used it mainly to support people with dementia who had expressive speech problems in particular word finding difficulties. Using the ACS-UK supported them to identify their meaningful activities, reduced stress levels (e.g., not having to rely on verbal speech output) and enabled choice in goal planning’ [5.5].
5. Sources to corroborate the impact
[5.1] Marrison E (2020) Face and content validity and clinical utility of the Structured Observational Test of Function (SOTOF) from the perspective of patients with a neurological diagnosis and a stroke rehabilitation multi-disciplinary team. Masters by Research Degree thesis. York St John University, School of Sciences, Technology and Health. York.
[5.2] Marrison E, Laver-Fawcett A, Purton J (2019) The content validity of the Structured Observational Test of Function 2nd edition from the perspective of a stroke rehabilitation multi-disciplinary team. UK Stroke Forum. Poster. Available from: https://ray.yorksj.ac.uk/id/eprint/4476/
[5.3] Correspondence: Senior Lecturer / Practice Placement Lead – Occupational Therapy, School of Allied Health, Midwifery and Social Care St George’s, University of London.
[5.4] Worthington E, Whitehead P, Li Z, Golding-Day M, Walker M (2020). An audit of dressing practice by occupational therapists in acute stroke settings in England. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 2020, Vol. 83(11) 664–673.
[5.5] Testimonial: Occupational Therapist Clinical Researcher, North East London Foundation Trust, c/o Dementia Research Centre, Research & Development Department.
[5.6] Testimonial: Care Coordinator/Occupational Therapist, Older Person SSE Leeds Community Mental Health team, Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust.
[5.7] Implementation evaluation data from a survey, focus group and interview conducted February-March 2019 with occupational therapists in Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Trust and Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust.
[5.8] Testimonial: Occupational Therapist and Head of Unit Occupational Therapy of az groeninge Ergotherapeut Revalidatie, campus Reepkaai, Belgium.
[5.9] Occupational Therapists’ feedback following workshops on SOTOF or ACS-UK.
- Submitting institution
- York St John University
- Unit of assessment
- 3 - Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
- Summary impact type
- Societal
- Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
- No
1. Summary of the impact
The York St John Counselling & Mental Health Centre ( https://www.yorksj.ac.uk/working-with-the-community/counselling-and-mental-health-centre/) provides accessible evidence-based wellbeing interventions to citizens. Established in 2016, it develops and delivers practice-based evidence and evidence-based services for citizens of York and North Yorkshire, along with the recent addition of online practice and research due to the Covid-19 pandemic.
Underpinned by core values of community, collaboration, and creativity, the Centre develops research and practice associated with a range of mental health and wellbeing issues, with specific expertise and research outputs related to domestic violence, bereavement, trauma, and anger management. It offers high quality research, training and placement options for trainee practitioners and students interested in developing skills and knowledge of leadership and management in frontline mental health services.
Partnerships forged with regional and local domestic violence organisations ( IDAS; York Women’s Centre), a local council ( City of York), a Coaching Community Interest Company ( Coaching York), and a hospice ( Teeside Hospice), support delivery of research projects, whilst an active Advisory Board brings strategic expertise from health, public health, business and third sectors [5.3].
2. Underpinning research
As a precursor to opening of the Centre, the Director was part of a team successful in securing £450k funding for a randomised trial (PRaCTICED) from the British Association for Counselling & Psychotherapy [3.6] . The trial examined the efficacy of an NHS Increasing Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) intervention, Counselling for Depression (CfD), compared with outcomes from Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT). Professor Gabriel secured NHS contracts to commission York St John to deliver (IAPT) training on CfD at York St John University. This is now a thriving NHS commissioned training programme for York St John and contributes to IAPT delivery across Northern England. A paper summarising the RCT outcomes is currently under review with Lancet Psychiatry.
Funding of £10k was secured from York Feoffees, to work in partnership with IDAS (Independent Domestic Abuse Services) to research a young person to parent aggression project [3.1] and develop an evidence-based group intervention for children [3.2]. Key findings from the research included recognition of the value of intervening with both the aggressive child and the parent; it was also found that frontline workers (including social workers, police, domestic abuse agency workers, youth workers) could be deeply and negatively impacted by their work experiences [3.1]. The pilot group for children found that participants valued the strengths-based approach which provided relationship and behavioural skills to take away from the group experience [3.2]. Additionally, the Centre’s Director and Research Fellow (Dr Jeannette Roddy, Salford University) have developed a training curriculum for counsellors working with domestic abuse [3.3].
Dr Gary Shepherd leads on anger management research. Shepherd designed a behavioural modification module, delivered through the Centre, which demonstrated positive impact for participants who were able to make positive adjustments in their self and other perceptions and behaviours [3.5]. Dr Trish Hobman leads on training psychological therapists to deliver IAPT therapy in the NHS and led on delivery of the CfD practitioner training for practitioners involved in the PRaCTICED trial [3.6]. York St John contributed to the outcomes paper from the RCT (under review with Lancet Psychiatry at time of case study submission). Dr John Wilson, an Honorary Research Fellow in the Centre, collaborates with Professor Gabriel on bereavement research [3.4]. Teesside Hospice and the Centre are piloting a bereavement measure, AGES, developed through Centre research. A case study paper on the use of AGES is in review with the British Journal of Guidance and Counselling. Feedback from the Teesside Hospice has been positive, with the measure providing valuable evidence of progress for the bereaved. At the time of the case study submission the research project Learning from our Losses, researching bereavement in the Care Home Sector during the Covid-19 pandemic, is being finalised.
In 2018, the York St John University Centre established a Research and Training Clinic Consortium (RTCC) involving York St John, Abertay, Newman and Salford Universities. Recent additions to RTCC research projects include the Open University, Roehampton, plus University of East London [5.10]. RTCC’s inaugural project involves testing a new outcome measure, ReQoL (recovering quality of life measure, which the Centre is licensed to administer) within the context of humanistic and pluralistic therapies. Additionally, RTCC is undertaking a Prospero registered evidence review of online counselling .
In 2019 the Centre was invited to contribute to the creation of the Northern Quarter Project, a City of York Council initiated project in York involving York St John Counselling & Mental Health Centre, Converge, lived experience members of local communities, City of York Council, North Yorkshire Police, TEWV (Tees, Esk & Weir NHS Trust), Clinical Commissioning Group, and Mind. The work involves evidence-based decision-making and researching, and the mapping of current provision for mental health and wellbeing – see https://www.yorkpress.co.uk/news/18216798.pioneering-project-boost-mental-health-northern-york-launched/).
3. References to the research
Selected domestic violence references:
[3.1] Gabriel, Lynne, Tizro, Zahra, James, Hazel, Cronin-Davis, Jane, Beetham, Tanya, Corbally, Alice, Lopez-Moreno, Emily and Hill, Sarah (2018) “Give me some space”: Exploring young person-to-parent aggression and violence. Journal of Family Violence, 33 (2). pp. 161-169. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007%2Fs10896\-017\-9928\-1
[3.2] Beetham, Tanya, Gabriel, Lynne and James, Hazel (2019) Young Children’s Narrations of Relational Recovery: a School-Based Group for Children Who Have Experienced Domestic Violence. Journal of Family Violence. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896\-018\-0028\-7
[3.3] Roddy, Jeannette and Gabriel, Lynne (2019) A Competency Framework for Domestic Violence Counselling. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 47 (6). pp. 669-681. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2019.1599322
Bereavement references:
[3.4] Wilson, John, Gabriel, Lynne and James, Hazel (2016) Making sense of loss and grief: the value of in-depth assessments. Bereavement Care, 35 (2). pp. 67-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/02682621.2016.1218127
Anger management references:
[3.5] Shepherd, Gary and Cant, Matthew (2019) Difficult to change? The differences between successful and not‐so‐successful participation in anger management groups. Counselling & Psychotherapy Research, 20 (2). pp 214-223. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12276
Counselling:
[3.6] Saxon, D., Ashley, K., Bishop-Edwards, L., Connell, J. Harrison, P., Ohlsen, S., Hardy, G.E., Kellett, S., Mukuria, C., Mank, T., Bower, P., Bradburn, M., Brazier, J., Elliott, R., Gabriel, L., King, M., Pilling, S., Shaw, S., Waller, G., Barkham, M. (2017) A pragmatic randomized controlled trial assessing the non-inferiority of counselling for depression versus cognitive-behaviour therapy for patients in primary care meeting a diagnosis of moderate or severe depression (PRaCTICED): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials, 18, 93. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063\-017\-1834\-6
Evidence of Quality:* outputs 1-6 are peer-reviewed articles. Peer reviewed grants include: PRaCTICED £450k multi-university RCT, PI Professor Michael Barkham / Professor Gabriel co-I (£22k to York St John) [3.6]. A Feoffees’ grant of £10k supported research with IDAS [3.1]. A research project bid ‘ Learning from our Losses’ on bereavement in the Care Sector is through to a second round for potential NIHR funding.
4. Details of the impact
Nature of the Impact: Client Benefit
Generating sustainable practice is core to the Centre’s work. The Centre has directly influenced the lives of over 1000 service users: positively impacting their relationships, families, work, and lives. Outcomes compare well with outputs from the Government’s Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) programme with 90% of our clients moving from moderate to minor mental distress across the course of treatment. Reach and significance is amplified through service user and partner networks, plus outcome evidence [5.2; 5.9].
Client testimonies endorse how the services have enhanced their wellbeing and mental health. Reaching clients through health and social care contacts and networks in the wider community and by ‘word of mouth’, former clients now regularly recommending it to others.
Direct impact through provision of research-informed and evidence-based interventions is epitomised in typical client feedback we receive [5.2; 5.9] - see examples below:
“I have used the services of cmhc twice in recent years (for relationship counselling and anger management). Both experiences were of a service run in a professional but compassionate way leading to constructive and positive outcomes”.
“The counselling has made a significant impact for me. Both in terms of dealing with current issues but also identifying and addressing underlying past issues that were having an impact on my life”.
“Please keep doing what you’re doing, and I know you will continue to make a difference to so many peoples’ lives”.
Shepherd’s work [3.5] proves how clients who access evidence-based anger management groups can support themselves through emotional regulation to move forward effectively and to change previous aggressive behaviour. This is also evidenced in the first client statement above. Gabriel and Wilson’s work on bereavement [3.4] has led to the development of a grief measure, AGES, which is being tested in Teesside Hospice and the Centre; importantly, the measure provides evidence for clients of how their counselling work has supported them to recover from their bereavement and loss. The measure has also been used for an online (video) COVID-19 bereavement support group; all members of the group moved from a deeply traumatised state through to acknowledgement of their situation and adjustment to their circumstances. Feedback from participants plus requests from stakeholders indicate the value of access to evidence-based bereavement support [5.8; 5.9], including a bereavement support group (pilot ran September-December 2020) and a closed social media support group (currently 400+ members) . The Centre hosted the 2020 1st International Online Bereavement Conference, attended by several hundred UK and International delegates, generating interest in further work and events [5.7; 5.10], including being commissioned to provide consultancy to a national bereavement organisation [5.8], plus testimonies from the Hospice sector, epitomised by a ‘thank you’ letter from St Gemma’s Hospice [5.9].
Gabriel et al’s work on domestic violence and abuse (DVA) and its impact on young people and adults has drawn attention to the need for early interventions to prevent future mental ill-health or victimisation later in life [3.2]. DVA research highlighted the impact on frontline workers of exposure to violence and abuse [3.1] and influenced development of a research-informed training for frontline practitioners [3.3; 5.5]. The research has informed and supported work at IDAS, a leading UK DVA charity, and we are in the process of evaluating further groups delivered in North Yorkshire. As with many areas of work, Covid-19 has impacted on access to School contexts and pupils/parents/teachers.
Building Impact Impetus: Influencing Communities and Professionals
The Centre’s research and training practice not only influences local and national communities, citizens, and practitioners [5.1; 5.2], it also provides life and work-related experiences for new practitioner generations and roles in frontline mental health practice - not least in the form of real-life and meaningful research and practice at the frontline of mental health services. Since opening, over 100 trainee practitioner opportunities and research associate roles have created work-related administrative, management and Advisory Board placements for undergraduate and postgraduate students, plus five Graduate Interns furthered their careers. Employment for local students has been generated, with two students currently employed as Office Administrators. All former employees have secured jobs, internships, funded PhDs, or tenured academic Graduate Teaching Assistant (GTA) posts.
The Centre’s research contributes to and informs the International Pluralistic Practice Network (https://pluralisticpractice.weebly.com/links.html\). The network draws international academics and researchers from the field of integrative therapy practice. A 2016 textbook captures research-based and evidence-informed work and research from the network; see https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/the-handbook-of-pluralistic-counselling-and-psychotherapy/book243250#contents which includes a chapter from Gabriel (2016, pages 300-313) and is used by UK and European Pluralistic training programmes (including University counsellor training programmes at Queens, Abertay, Roehampton, South Wales, Oslo).
Gabriel’s work with the British Association for Counselling & Psychotherapy and research-based textbooks on ethics have influenced practice ethics. Relational Ethics in Practice, an edited text https://www.routledge.com/Relational-Ethics-in-Practice-Narratives-from-Counselling-and-Psychotherapy/Gabriel-Casemore/p/book/9780415425919 and Speaking the Unspeakable
https://www.routledge.com/Speaking-the-Unspeakable-The-Ethics-of-Dual-Relationships-in-Counselling/Gabriel/p/book/9780203086933 a research-informed exemplar text on dual and multiple role relationships in counselling and psychotherapy, have enhanced the clinical, training and research work in the clinic, as well as the counselling professions more widely, with citations in International journals plus use as resources within counsellor training sites [5.5]. Gabriel Chairs BACP’s Ethics and Good Practice Guidance Committee, responsible for the development and enhancement of the Associations Ethical Framework for the Counselling Professions, plus production of ethics resources available through multiple media, including online and print-based [5.1]. The synergies of professional knowledge and evidence derived from the Centre’s work and research, concurrent with development work with the BACP Committee, provide a fertile context and impetus for advancing evidence-informed practice; with updating of the Ethical Framework due in 2021, providing a context to innovate UK and International practice ethics.
Gabriel’s ethics research informs BACP good practice guidance resources; her Good Practice in Action GPiA044 resource is one of the top downloaded documents ( over 900 downloads January-November 2020, plus over 2000 views of an online e-resource on ethical decision-making), providing research and practice-based informed guidance for counselling professionals. In early 2020, Gabriel worked closely with the Association to identify and provide key online evidence-based resources for upskilling practitioner members [5.1] during the Covid-19 crisis. One resource focussed primarily on safeguarding and managing risk online whilst the other supported supervisors to prepare them for challenges they may encounter when working with supervisees online [5.1]. These online resource events were attended by over 2,000 practitioner members of BACP including International members. Gabriel’s work supported BACP to venture into delivering remotely recorded online events to large numbers of Association members [5.1].
Research and practice outputs reached York and North Yorkshire communities through York Mix (a monthly column across 2019) and broadcasts on Radio York. A paper on domestic abuse, published in 2020 in The Conversation [5.4], generated an increase in domestic violence referrals to the Centre and the development of a partnership with York Women’s Centre.
Arising from the Covid-19 pandemic, to enable access to the research-based Centre services, practitioners were provided with training on working through online video and telephone platforms. We are now seeing increased referrals from across the UK and, to support our practice and research into online therapy, a rapid review is underway with RTCC members ( the review involves Open University plus Abertay, Salford, Newman, Roehampton and York St John Universities) on the effectiveness of online counselling. The review has an approved Prospero registration. A second RTCC research phase will see analyses of its national minimum dataset - with national and international impact for the delivery of humanistic and pluralistic psychological therapies. Additionally, York St John University have invested in growth of the Centre though the provision of bespoke premises at 32-34 Clarence Street, York (due to open Autumn 2021) to enable expansion of research projects, knowledge production and exchange, and evidence-based research and practice placements.
5. Sources to corroborate the impact
[5.1] Testimonial: Statement from BACP Professional Body, on member engagement with Professor Gabriel’s event for online therapy work.
[5.2] Testimonial: Client statement on the impact of accessing counselling at the Centre.
[5.3] Testimonial: Advisory Board Chair, British Association for Counselling & Psychotherapy (BACP) Immediate Past Chair and Associate Professor for the Counselling Professions & Mental Health at Chester University.
[5.4] Article: Domestic abuse paper published in The Conversation.
[5.5] Testimonial: Statement from UEL programme tutor on using Gabriel’s published evidence/ethics resources.
[5.6] Public News Article: York Press item on the York Northern Quarter Project; the YSJU Counselling & Mental Health Centre is a key player in this novel and innovative project
[5.7] The 1st International Online Bereavement Conference – November 2020, co-hosted by York St John Counselling & Mental Health Centre and UK Online Events team.
[5.8] Correspondence: Invitation to undertake bereavement consultancy work.
[5.9] Testimonials: bereavement clients of the mental health centre.
[5.10] Correspondence: Expression of Interest and request to join the York St John founded Research & Training Clinic Consortium (RTCC).