Skip to main

Impact case study database

The impact case study database allows you to browse and search for impact case studies submitted to the REF 2021. Use the search and filters below to find the impact case studies you are looking for.

Search and filter

Filter by

  • Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh
   None selected
  • 26 - Modern Languages and Linguistics
   None selected
   None selected
   None selected
   None selected
   None selected
   None selected
Waiting for server
Download currently selected sections for currently selected case studies (spreadsheet) (generating)
Download currently selected case study PDFs (zip) (generating)
Download tags for the currently selected case studies (spreadsheet) (generating)
Currently displaying text from case study section
Showing impact case studies 1 to 2 of 2
Submitting institution
Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh
Unit of assessment
26 - Modern Languages and Linguistics
Summary impact type
Health
Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
No

1. Summary of the impact

The main impact was the clinically significant resolution of persistent and apparently intractable speech sound disorders in children. Speech therapy exploited our instrumentation, analysis measures, and clinical protocols, making children's speech more like that of their peers, and more intelligible.

Our stabilised, spatio-temporally detailed and acoustically-synchronized ultrasound images convey the shape, location and movement of a child’s tongue accurately. Our speech therapy treatment protocols facilitate accurate clinical assessment and effective intervention. Meaningful feedback (in real time and using previous in-therapy recordings) supports clinicians (and their families) to help children to suppress incorrect speech gestures, and introduce correct ones.

2. Underpinning research

Our interdisciplinary approach involved engineering, linguistic and clinical research. Results from each area informed the others. Furthermore, clinical intervention was conceived within a cyclic, causal model of research/impact: so our clinical intervention generated the bulk of the impact in this case study, but also fed “back” into our research (see environment). Our research achieved:

  • Audio-synchronised, stabilised, high-speed Ultrasound Tongue Imaging (UTI), making ultrasound more effective and accessible as a tool for articulatory phonetics [1-3]

  • Experimental studies (clinical and non-clinical) of child (and adult) speech e.g. [3-4]

  • Adaption of motor therapy principles, producing protocols for the assessment and remediation of persistent and intractable speech sound disorders using UTI [4-5]

  • Theoretical models of clinical speech sound gesture acquisition and mastery involving gradient and categorical changes at the phonetics/phonology interface e.g. [6]

Ultrasound scanners are safe and non-invasive, and so can advance articulatory phonetic research by imaging the shape and location of the tongue during speech. Even off-the-shelf medical scanners can provide reasonable feedback that might be clinically useful, a potential area of impact that was an initial motivation for this research. Our early underpinning research [1] solved technical problems arising because off-the-shelf scanners (a) sampled the moving tongue at low rates, causing artefacts, (b) had no integrated capacity to record audio (speech sounds) and (c) produced low quality video output that was unacceptably variable when aligning ultrasound and acoustic signals post-hoc. Between 2006 and 2016, QMU and spin-out company Articulate Instruments Ltd (as Category C research collaborator) invented and developed reliable, (ultra) high-speed audio-visual systems for speech capture and analysis [2]. QMU also commissioned and tested the Articulate Instruments’ aluminium headset, which provides stabilisation without forcing speakers to restrict natural head movements. These new instruments were implemented and improved in QMU’s unique multi-channel articulatory laboratory [2] along with methods for ergonomic data-collection. We developed methods suitable for within and between speaker comparisons of children’s speech through developmental and clinical research that recorded over 100 child speakers (including 58 typically developing children within the EPSRC-funded “ULTRAX” project [4]). Carnegie Trust funding let us use parallel MRI and UTI studies of 12 phoneticians producing canonical samples of speech sounds to enhance our understanding, improve analyses, and to record two expert model talkers Janet Beck (QMU) and John Esling (Victoria, Canada) comprehensively exemplifying the International Phonetic Alphabet [3].

Most importantly, our applied clinical research included real-world interventions for a range of persistent speech sound disorders. Clinical researcher and SLT Cleland (with support from Roxburgh as a PhD student) undertook over 100 clinical sessions during ULTRAX (2011-2014) with 8 children [4]. Building on this research, clinical researcher Roxburgh (in collaboration with Cleland, who had taken up a permanent post at Strathclyde University) recruited 20 children (mean age 8.9 years) for the CSO-funded Ultraphonix (2015-2016) of whom 15 underwent, in total, over 200 sessions (45 for baseline assessment, 157 for treatment and 12 for maintenance probes) [5]. Clinical use of real-time visual biofeedback of articulation was not entirely new, but elements of this clinical research directly led to impact by using our own underpinning:

  • technical advances providing stabilised high quality data [1-2]

  • understanding of typical child speech development and adult speech production in relation to (a) ultrasound images [2-4] and to (b) (clinical) models of real-time, delayed and therapist-mediated biofeedback in relation to motor learning, [4-5]

  • articulatory norms for measuring degrees of overt and covert phonological contrast [4-6].

Moreover, for the clinical research, our research created a detailed, practicable and effective intervention protocol using motor-learning therapeutic techniques [4-5] tailored for our ultrasound system’s capabilities [2]. Audio-ultrasound recordings of previous sessions (and typical child productions [4]) let client and clinician reflect on the client’s improvement, or enabled comparisons to the age-matched typically-developing children collected for this specific purpose during ULTRAX [4].

3. References to the research

  1. Wrench AA. and Scobbie JM (2006) Spatio-temporal inaccuracies of video-based ultrasound images of the tongue. Proceedings of the 7th International Seminar on Speech Production, pp. 451-458.

  2. Wrench AA. and Scobbie JM (2016) Queen Margaret University ultrasound, audio and video multichannel recording facility (2008-2016). CASL Working Papers, Queen Margaret University, WP-24.

  3. Cleland J, Wrench AA, Scobbie JM and Semple S (2011) Comparing articulatory images: An MRI / Ultrasound Tongue Image database. Proceedings of the 9th ISSP, pp. 163-170.

  4. Cleland J, Scobbie JM and Wrench AA (2015) Using ultrasound visual biofeedback to treat persistent primary speech sound disorders. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 29(8-10), pp. 575-597 .

  5. Cleland J, Scobbie JM, Heyde C, Roxburgh Z and Wrench AA (2019) Enabling new articulatory gestures in children with persistent speech sound disorders using ultrasound visual biofeedback. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 62(2), pp. 229-24.

  6. Cleland J and Scobbie JM (2019) Acquisition of new speech motor plans via articulatory visual biofeedback. In Fuchs, Cleland and Rochet-Cappelan (eds.) Speech Production and Perception: Learning and Memory. Berlin: Peter Lang. 139-159.

Evidence of 2* quality: some outputs were peer reviewed, for journals [4-5] or proceedings [1, 3]. Outputs submitted in REF2 are [4] & [5]. The research in [3] was competitively funded by the Carnegie Trust. Two research-council-level projects (CSO & EPSRC) funded the clinical research generating [4-6]. Note, some impact arising (2014-2020) from our underpinning research is therefore reported within (hence is corroborated by) underpinning research outputs (Section 4.1). Authors in bold were QMU members of staff at the time of publication.

4. Details of the impact

4.1 Planned, Causal, Internal Clinical Impact

In our research/impact model, we recruited 28 child clients aged 6-14 to two clinical research projects, treated in 1 hour therapy sessions in a 10-12 week block. Most of the clinical impact arising during the census period occurred within the Ultraphonix project (2015-2016), and is corroborated by our underpinning research output [5], so we focus here on that Case Series.

15 children recruited for Ultraphonix were suitable for and completed our protocol of motor-based therapy with ultrasound visual biofeedback [5]. Overall, they improved speech intelligibility (rated holistically by their parents, see below). Intelligibility improved because our research interventions identified, targeted and successfully resolved errors in key consonants or vowels that had been persistent and unresolved, to a clinically significant degree for 10 of these children, as quantified by effect-size analysis [5].

Embedded image Audible improvements in speech sounds above stable baseline (BL) can be shown as “percent treated targets correct (% TTC)”. Figure 1 charts the mean improvement of all the 15 children. Accuracy increased from below 5% TTC at baseline to 60% TTC in maintenance assessments (3 months post-intervention), as measured in clinic using probes, which, because they comprised words that had not been used in treatment, show both generalisation and retention [5-6].

Figure 1. Mean increase in Treated Targets Correct in Ultraphonix Project (+/- 1 s.d.)

Generally [5], our intervention protocol (a) was successful, (b) in a wide variety of targeted speech sounds, (c) was relatively rapid, and (d) speech continued to improve after treatment ended (Figure 1). Wide individual differences in rates and levels of improvement were found, suggesting children with comorbidities might benefit from higher dosage [5].

As noted, holistic improvements to the children’s intelligibility were reported by parents, post-intervention. These were quantified via the “Intelligibility in Context Scale” (ICS) [5]. Children improved from being “sometimes understood” to “usually understood” [5] outwith clinic. This improved intelligibility is permanent, and improves the quality of life of the children [s1].

ULTRAX (2011-2014) and Ultraphonix (2015-2016) plus other treatment by our PhD students and clinical research staff were the first using UTI in Europe. In a systematic review of all 29 published intervention-based research studies worldwide 1985-2017 [s2], ULTRAX [6] was one of 19 studies with positive outputs for all its participants. Like Ultraphonix, but unlike most previous studies [6, 8], [s8], ULTRAX targeted a diverse range of speech sounds (vs. the focus on consonant /r/ in North American research). ULTRAX had 8 child participants, the second highest enrolment to 2017. However, only three ULTRAX children were treated during the impact census period, so we do not highlight the project as a whole here, beyond noting aspects that apply to all the participants. Moreover, Ultraphonix had more participants, some with comorbidities, and a more diverse set of targets. Also, we noted above that materials from both projects fed back, cyclically, into our underpinning (and other) research [6], and that research then generated more impact (see below).

Longer term, increased accuracy and intelligibility can bring long-lasting and deep social, personal and educational benefits, augmenting the evidence of %TTC and ICS in [4, 5]. For example, client A (treated in ULTRAX before Aug 2013) sent an unsolicited email in 2018 illustrating the long-lasting nature of the impact (i.e. after August 2013):

“*the … speech therapy at Queen Margaret University helped me more than nine years of normal speech therapy through the schools and the doctors. Having this experience helped because it made me understand the movements of my tongue through looking at the scans. This experience gave me so much more confidence and really helped me get from bottom of almost all of my classes in primary school and really struggling. It helped me moved up in my classes and not feel so shy.*”(sic) [s1]

4.2 Early Stage External Clinical Impact

[s3]: A paediatric NHS Speech and Language Therapy service piloted a specialist clinical provision 2015-2016, adapting our clinical protocols [4, 5] for 12 children with varied disorders. Beneficial impacts were (and see also **[s10]**):

  1. Confirming diagnosis of articulatory difficulty in terms of tongue placement

  2. Supporting children and young people to understand what they needed to change in terms of their tongue placement

  3. Helping families to understand their children’s articulatory difficulties and treatment

  4. Being a useful motivator for some children

[s4] An external EPSRC research project (ULTRAX-2020) has been extending our underpinning research. It incorporated clinical intervention which we cite as impact. It shows “ that by using ultrasound to provide visual feedback of the tongue in real-time, children can learn to produce speech sounds which have previously been impossible for them”. Due to COVID, planned collaborations with clinicians were cancelled or severely curtailed in 2020.

[s5] ULTRAX-2020 adopted clinical protocols and norms from [4-5], disseminating an open access Clinicians' Resource Manual in 2018. This free-to-use 87 page clinical manual from SLTs and clinical researchers on the ULTRAX-2020 project presents our underpinning research in a format tailored for practical clinical use, including our wordlists and protocols. [s6] notes for those clients “whose errors persist despite treatment”, our protocols succeed, and do so for a wider variety of targets than other clinical research groups have addressed.

4.3 Engineering, Educational and Open Science Resources

[s7] Our ULTRAX and Ultraphonix data (annotated and labelled) was adopted as the initial content for “UltraSuite” (2018), an open curated repository for machine learning engineers. Our contribution comprised over 13 hours of speech from 76 children, of which the clinical speech component (from before and during treatment) is the largest articulatory corpus worldwide.

Our underpinning research [3] was used for a website [s8] that is used for phonetic courses, self-learning, and continuing professional development for SLTs [s9]. For example, [s10] notes that [s8] is used by clinicians to “develop the child’s and parents’ knowledge of how particular sounds

are made”, enhancing therapeutic intervention and providing motivation. [s8] is itself the subject of an impact case study from the University of Glasgow, which notes that 10% of over 250,000 users worldwide are SLTs (along with students, the public, second language learning community), and that 99% of users rate it useful.

5. Sources to corroborate the impact

[s1] Client A (mid-teens) – Unpublished, unsolicited private email to QMU (2018). [document]

[s2] Sugden E, Lloyd S, Lam J, Cleland J (2019) Systematic Review of Ultrasound Visual Biofeedback in Intervention for Speech Sound Disorders. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 54(5): 705-728. [behind paywall, so submitted as document]

[s3] Hawkes C et al (2017). A pilot of the use of Ultrasound Tongue Imaging in the assessment and therapy of children with Speech Sound Disorders within NHS Settings. Unpublished private report. NHS Lothian Children and Young People’s Speech and Language Therapy Service. [document]

[s4] ULTRAX-2020. EPSRC project. (Aug 2017-May 2021) and Ultrax2020: Ultrasound Technology for Optimising the Treatment of Speech Disorders.

[s5] Cleland J, Wrench A, Lloyd S, Sugden E (2018) ULTRAX2020 : Ultrasound Technology for Optimising the Treatment of Speech Disorders: Clinicians' Resource Manual. Open Access manuscript

[s6] Javier Jasso (March 2019) Ultrasound visual biofeedback: a new tool for treating SSD. [website] The Informed SLP. [content behind paywall so text presented as document]

[s7] UltraSuite: a repository of ultrasound and acoustic data from child speech therapy sessions [website repository and 2018 paper]

[s8] Seeing Speech: an articulatory web resource for the study of Phonetics . [website] in particular the pages on Comparing MRI and UTI pages and Recording UTI and Lips

[s9] Testimonial by member of Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists Speech Sound Disorder Clinical Excellence Network [personal contact details]

[s10] Hobden C, Cowen S, Hawkes C (2018). From Research to Everyday Ultrasound – A Community Clinician’s Perspective. Unpublished private report. NHS Lothian Children and Young People’s Speech and Language Therapy Service [document]

Submitting institution
Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh
Unit of assessment
26 - Modern Languages and Linguistics
Summary impact type
Technological
Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
No

1. Summary of the impact

Enhanced professional services in Forensic Phonetics:

  • Forensic analysis of speech data is enhanced by a specialist voice analysis approach (Vocal Profile Analysis), influencing the practice of forensic phoneticians, police, legal practitioners and their clients.

Commercial value in voice characterization for creative industries:

  • Investment created a start-up company (The Voice Distillery Ltd), exploiting our innovative approach to commercial voice-casting to streamline processes for agents, production companies and voiceover artists.

Support for remote voice therapy:

  • Our findings about which acoustic voice parameters are captured reliably with mobile phones inform international guidelines for clinical voice assessment and therapy during Covid19, with benefits for clinicians and patients.

2. Underpinning research

The multi-stranded research underpinning this impact is focussed on improving our understanding of the nature, causes and effects of voice variation (within and between speakers) and developing and identifying reliable indicators of voice quality characteristics. Our research is interdisciplinary and differs from much previous voice research by employing a theoretically informed perceptual model (Vocal Profile Analysis, developed initially by Laver and Beck and refined over several decades) as a link between the acoustic signal and qualitative interpretation in voice health and other contexts. Linguistics and phonetics provide theoretical frameworks for understanding the linguistic, paralinguistic and extralinguistic functions of voice, speech science informs acoustic analysis, and speech and language therapy provides theoretical bases for understanding the links between voice quality and vocal health.

Research that is aimed at development, evaluation and application of specialist perceptual and acoustic techniques for voice analysis spans several decades. The work of Beck (aka Mackenzie Beck) has continued to be crucial for the development of the Vocal Profile Analysis (VPA) scheme, a phonetic tool for perceptual analysis of voice quality, from its inception. VPA involves expert auditory-perceptual judgment of the various parameters (“settings”) that contribute to overall voice quality. Each setting has defined physiological and acoustic correlates, so the completed analysis provides a comprehensive indication of a speaker’s habitual voice production tendencies. An innovative aspect was the inclusion of both laryngeal factors (e.g. whisperiness, creakiness) and vocal tract adjustments (e.g. tongue or jaw settings), reflecting the complex interrelationships within the voice production system. Since 2000, research has involved refinement and evaluation of VPA (e.g. [1]) and establishment of sociophonetic voice norms needed for clinical and other applications (e.g. [2] elucidates geographical and gender-related voice variation in adolescents). Our VPA research has been a reference point for researchers in the UK, Brazil, Spain, China, Ireland and Sweden, working in sociophonetics, speech pathology, articulatory phonetics (e.g. MRI investigation of physiological correlates of settings) and forensic science.

One recurring research interest is the extraordinary range of meaningful variability in the human voice and the associated immense semantic space of voice descriptors in everyday as well as literary language (e.g. describing the sound, character attributions or interlocutor effects of voices). In [3] we argue for an intermediate phonetic level of description when mapping acoustic voice signals to voice descriptors in order to provide better descriptive structure and transparency.

VPA is the only phonetic description system that is detailed enough to serve as this intermediate level of description. Our model requires a detailed understanding of the relation between acoustic and VPA parameters. In [3] we lay the foundations of a systematic mapping of acoustics to VPA by presenting significant correlations between a subset of VPA settings and acoustic parameters. These findings and the associated ideas about levels of description have informed the foundational concept of a new commercial enterprise, as outlined below.

Acoustic analysis is an important component of clinical voice analysis, and much of our recent research focusses on the challenges associated with this, by elucidating the acoustic correlates of perceptual judgments (as in [3] above) and assessing the reliability of acoustic parameters across different environments. The potential of smartphones for health-related data collection is widely recognized, but their use in voice health depends on reliability of acoustic data. Our interdisciplinary research confirmed the reliability of smartphone recordings for certain acoustic parameters (mean F0 and cepstral peak prominence showed acceptable random error size) but not others (jitter and shimmer). It also highlighted some important methodological issues that inform clinical assessment; these have proved to be of particular relevance in the context of remote working associated with Covid-19 [4,5].

4. Details of the impact

1. International impact on professional services and professional education: voice analysis in Forensic Phonetics

In evaluating the probability that two or more voice samples are from the same speaker, forensic phoneticians use a multistranded suite of acoustic and perceptual analysis tools. Where acoustic quality of audio recordings used as evidence in court is inadequate for reliable acoustic analysis, perceptual tools (e.g. VPA) become especially important. VPA training based on our research [1] delivered to three key groups of forensic phoneticians as a pathway to impact (JP French Associates (JPFA) + University of York (UoY); Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) + Brazilian Federal Police; and the Netherlands Forensics Institute) generated impact in several ways.

JP French Associates, one of the world’s leading forensic speech laboratories, first adopted our VPA framework in 2010 and continued to do so through the census period, creating a streamlined version specifically for forensic purposes [s1]; this version is now (2020) used by at least two other UK forensic experts/firms. Peter French (founder of JPFA) writes [s2]:

“…. in 2009 we decided that the VPA was the most phonetically-grounded and detailed tool available for voice quality analysis and description……. On the basis of her (Beck’s) training, it became clear that our adopting the VPA would enhance the reliability, replicability and transparency of the tests that we apply when comparing recorded voice samples…… I would estimate the number of cases in which we have used it to be in excess of 1,500. It now [i.e. during the census period] forms a significant element of the forensic speaker comparison procedure and has been critical in some cases in arriving at a positive or negative conclusion. The use of the modified VPA is mentioned in all official JPFA forensic speaker comparison reports, and it has been frequently mentioned in oral evidence delivered from the witness box in trials also.”

A recent report on rigorous testing of VPA included the statement “ We further conclude that the perceptual assessment of voice quality using the VPA scheme is an essential tool in fields such as forensic phonetics” [s3].

VPA is now a core part of the curriculum for UoY’s undergraduate and postgraduate forensic phonetics programmes. VPA is also included in UoY’s CPD course in Forensic Speech and Audio Analysis. Professional groups from six continents, including police, detectives, government employees, acousticians, forensic scientists in other disciplines and software engineers, have participated in the six iterations of this course, influencing forensic casework in the UK and internationally.

In Brazil a Portuguese translation of VPA (“BP-VPAS”) is routinely used by Federal Police in forensic reports (~150 reports per year). Federal Police training in forensic science includes a module on VPA facilitated by PUC-SP and police from regional states confirm its value as an investigative tool [s4]. In December 2020 Brazilian government recognition of the importance of this work was demonstrated by the announcement of CAPES funding (amount currently confidential) for a strategic partnership to develop undergraduate and postgraduate programmes in forensic science which will include VPA as a core module (partner institutions = Federal Police, PUC-SP, University of Campinas).

The utilization of VPA in forensic phonetics in the UK, Europe and Brazil, drawing on our underpinning research, is supporting evidence-based decisions in criminal cases, thus contributing to the delivery of justice.

2. Commercial impact of VPA and VPA-based acoustic analysis in creative industries

As part of a planned approach to generating impact our research on acoustic classification of voices based on VPA criteria [3] has led to public and private sector investment, which has enabled the creation of a new commercial enterprise in the voice-over industry (worth $4.4bn in 2015). Nowadays, voice-over jobs are frequently negotiated through online market places where voice-over job adverts are posted and voice-over artists audition by submitting voice samples. This creates a bottleneck for the task of shortlisting samples (often several hundred), which is a time-consuming, tedious and potentially ineffective method of voice selection. To develop a solution for this problem based on our research and associated models, we co-founded the limited company ‘The Voice Distillery Ltd’ in March 2020 (company number 656265). This is led by a multidisciplinary team of directors including a speech scientist (Schaeffler), a speech and language therapist (Beck) and two external directors. One is a software engineer and one an experienced voice-over artist and voice coach. The company raised private investment of £35,000 in May 2020 [s4] and has received a ‘SMART Scotland award’ of £67,000 in February 2020 [s5]. SMART is a Scottish business grant scheme aimed at SME’s for their early stage R&D. The ongoing feasibility study develops an AI based system to automatically evaluate and rank voice auditions with respect to client brief and target population preferences, testing the reliability of such a system in reference to a VPA-based representation level. Voice Distillery (currently, in late 2020) has four employees and six freelancers associated with the company [s4]. Despite the Covid19 pandemic, the company has reached all milestones of the SMART feasibility study so far and had recorded, annotated and processed over 3000 voice samples, submitted as auditions by voiceover artists, by the end of 2020, signalling how it has begun, building on our research, to meet the needs of this sector for objective and efficient voice classification. A business development consultant reporting on the company has made specific reference to our innovative application of technology, supported by our phonetic research, to solve industry problems [s6].

3. International impact on clinical guidelines and health policy

Much of our research is designed to generate clinical impact, and our findings have directly informed international clinical guidelines for voice assessment and therapy during Covid19. Our original research [4] gave specific recommendations about which clinical acoustic voice parameters can be reliably derived from smartphone recordings. Our findings for fundamental frequency (f0), shimmer and jitter were then integrated in published clinical guidelines, written by a consortium of 11 voice and swallowing disorder experts from five countries. These guidelines [s7], published in several languages, constitute consensus recommendations from the consortium, and are meant as an international clinical guide for speech-language therapists during the Covid19 pandemic. One of the recommendations provided in the text addresses the use of mobile phones and states that “ Clinicians can use voice samples recorded through a cell phone to obtain F0”, explicitly quoting our work.

5. Sources to corroborate the impact

[s1] San Segundo E & Mompean J.A. (2017) A Simplified Vocal Profile Analysis Protocol for the Assessment of Voice Quality and Speaker Similarity. Journal of Voice 31(5):644.e11-644.e2

[s2] Testimonial from Professor Peter French, Chairman, J.P French Associates, Forensics and Acoustics Laboratory

[s3] San Segundo, E., Foulkes, P., French, P., Harrison, P., Hughes, V. & Kavanagh, C. (2019) The use of the Vocal Profile Analysis for speaker characterization: Methodological proposals. Journal of the International Phonetic Association. 49. 353-380. 10.1017/S0025100318000130.

[s4] Extracts from email correspondence with Professor Sandra Madureira, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (January 2021) in which she translates and summarises information provided by Ronaldo Rodrigues da Silva (Brazilian Federal Police) on use of VPA in forensic investigations. Personal contact details also provided.

[s5] Testimonial from Voice Distillery Ltd accountant [personal contact details]

[s6] SMART award documentation

[s7] Testimonial from Natasha Blunt, Marketing and Business Development Consultant

[s8] Castillo-Allendes, A., Contreras-Ruston, F., Cantor, L., Codino, J., Guzman, M., Malebran, C., Manzano, C., Pavez, A., Vaiano, T., Wilder, F. and Behlau, M., Voice therapy in the context of the covid-19 pandemic; guidelines for clinical practice. Journal of Voice. (pdf of early online publication, August 2020, is provided).

Showing impact case studies 1 to 2 of 2

Filter by higher education institution

UK regions
Select one or more of the following higher education institutions and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No higher education institutions found.
Institutions

Filter by unit of assessment

Main panels
Select one or more of the following units of assessment and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No unit of assessments found.
Units of assessment

Filter by continued case study

Select one or more of the following states and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.

Filter by summary impact type

Select one or more of the following summary impact types and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.

Filter by impact UK location

UK Countries
Select one or more of the following UK locations and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No UK locations found.
Impact UK locations

Filter by impact global location

Continents
Select one or more of the following global locations and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No global locations found.
Impact global locations

Filter by underpinning research subject

Subject areas
Select one or more of the following underpinning research subjects and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No subjects found.
Underpinning research subjects