A factor of two: how the mitigation plans of “climate progressive” nations fall far short of Paris-compliant pathways
- Submitting institution
-
The University of Manchester
- Unit of assessment
- 12 - Engineering
- Output identifier
- 158749922
- Type
- D - Journal article
- DOI
-
10.1080/14693062.2020.1728209
- Title of journal
- Climate Policy
- Article number
- -
- First page
- 1290
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 10
- ISSN
- 1469-3062
- Open access status
- Compliant
- Month of publication
- May
- Year of publication
- 2020
- URL
-
-
- Supplementary information
-
-
- Request cross-referral to
- -
- Output has been delayed by COVID-19
- No
- COVID-19 affected output statement
- -
- Forensic science
- No
- Criminology
- No
- Interdisciplinary
- No
- Number of additional authors
-
2
- Research group(s)
-
B - MACE - Civil
- Proposed double-weighted
- No
- Reserve for an output with double weighting
- No
- Additional information
- This analysis led to impact on: 1) policy: one-to-one invited meeting with EC President’s climate advisor Kurt Vandenberghe about EU carbon budget proposal; ongoing engagement with other MEPs; scientific advisor to UK MPs developing the Climate and Ecological Emergency Bill; key evidence for the Scottish Government’s Climate Assembly; 2) civil society: from Extinction Rebellion to youth movements (carbon budget framing for Greta Thunberg’s speeches); 3) carbon budget projects for other nations (Czech Republic, Scotland), cities (Stockholm), local governments; 4) evidence base for several major legal cases (UK Government £1b funding of large LNG facility in Mozambique).
- Author contribution statement
- -
- Non-English
- No
- English abstract
- -
