Fixing the cracks in the crystal ball : a maturity model for quantitative risk assessment
- Submitting institution
-
University of York
- Unit of assessment
- 11 - Computer Science and Informatics
- Output identifier
- 54875010
- Type
- D - Journal article
- DOI
-
10.1016/j.ress.2013.09.008
- Title of journal
- Reliability Engineering and System Safety
- Article number
- -
- First page
- 67
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- -
- ISSN
- 0951-8320
- Open access status
- Out of scope for open access requirements
- Month of publication
- May
- Year of publication
- 2014
- URL
-
-
- Supplementary information
-
-
- Request cross-referral to
- -
- Output has been delayed by COVID-19
- No
- COVID-19 affected output statement
- -
- Forensic science
- No
- Criminology
- No
- Interdisciplinary
- No
- Number of additional authors
-
2
- Research group(s)
-
-
- Citation count
- 38
- Proposed double-weighted
- No
- Reserve for an output with double weighting
- No
- Additional information
- This was the first paper to present a comprehensive model of how quantitative risk assessment (QRA) can fail, in a way that is applicable to almost any specific QRA technique. Its approach to structuring the questions we can ask about QRA has influenced how others reason about them (e.g. Goerlandt et al 2017), and it’s specific multi-level classification of flaws in QRA has been used to structure review processes for QRA methods (e.g. Zeng & Zio 2017).
- Author contribution statement
- -
- Non-English
- No
- English abstract
- -