Quinean updates: In defense of "two dogmas"
- Submitting institution
-
University of Glasgow
- Unit of assessment
- 30 - Philosophy
- Output identifier
- 30-10945
- Type
- D - Journal article
- DOI
-
10.5840/jphil201811524
- Title of journal
- Journal of Philosophy
- Article number
- -
- First page
- 57
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 0022-362X
- Open access status
- Technical exception
- Month of publication
- February
- Year of publication
- 2018
- URL
-
http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/220233/
- Supplementary information
-
-
- Request cross-referral to
- -
- Output has been delayed by COVID-19
- No
- COVID-19 affected output statement
- -
- Forensic science
- No
- Criminology
- No
- Interdisciplinary
- No
- Number of additional authors
-
1
- Research group(s)
-
-
- Proposed double-weighted
- No
- Reserve for an output with double weighting
- No
- Additional information
- Pickel came up with the initial idea, which was significantly refined in collaboration with his co-author. The plan for each section was discussed together. Pickel and the co-author divided the writing of the initial sections. The crucial argumentative moves were in §6.1 which Pickel drafted and §6.2 which the co-author drafted. Every section was revised collaboratively after it was initially written.
- Author contribution statement
- -
- Non-English
- No
- English abstract
- -
