Comparing Ontology Authoring Workflows with Protégé: in the Laboratory, in the Tutorial and in the ‘Wild’
- Submitting institution
-
The University of Manchester
- Unit of assessment
- 11 - Computer Science and Informatics
- Output identifier
- 84387313
- Type
- D - Journal article
- DOI
-
10.1016/j.websem.2018.09.004
- Title of journal
- Journal of Web Semantics
- Article number
- 100473
- First page
- -
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- -
- ISSN
- 1570-8268
- Open access status
- Compliant
- Month of publication
- October
- Year of publication
- 2018
- URL
-
-
- Supplementary information
-
-
- Request cross-referral to
- -
- Output has been delayed by COVID-19
- No
- COVID-19 affected output statement
- -
- Forensic science
- No
- Criminology
- No
- Interdisciplinary
- No
- Number of additional authors
-
3
- Research group(s)
-
A - Computer Science
- Citation count
- 1
- Proposed double-weighted
- No
- Reserve for an output with double weighting
- No
- Additional information
- "The design recommendations that emerged from this work have been implemented in Protégé, one of the most popular ontology authoring frameworks. Protégé is used by 74% of ontologists [1] and has 366,084 registered users as of July 2020 [2].
[1] http://kmi.open.ac.uk/publications/pdf/kmi-13-01.pdf
[2] https://protege.stanford.edu/community.php
Protégé (contact: Senior Software Developer, Protégé at Stanford) confirms that such recommendations have been incorporated: search functionalities have been implemented into entity modification workflows."
- Author contribution statement
- -
- Non-English
- No
- English abstract
- -
