Preferred semantics as Socratic discussion
- Submitting institution
-
Cardiff University / Prifysgol Caerdydd
- Unit of assessment
- 11 - Computer Science and Informatics
- Output identifier
- 96800528
- Type
- D - Journal article
- DOI
-
10.1093/logcom/exu005
- Title of journal
- Journal of Logic and Computation
- Article number
- -
- First page
- 1257
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 0955-792X
- Open access status
- Out of scope for open access requirements
- Month of publication
- February
- Year of publication
- 2014
- URL
-
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/logcom/exu005
- Supplementary information
-
-
- Request cross-referral to
- -
- Output has been delayed by COVID-19
- No
- COVID-19 affected output statement
- -
- Forensic science
- No
- Criminology
- No
- Interdisciplinary
- No
- Number of additional authors
-
2
- Research group(s)
-
A - Artificial intelligence and data analytics
- Citation count
- 5
- Proposed double-weighted
- No
- Reserve for an output with double weighting
- No
- Additional information
- By explaining how formal argumentation (under the currently popular preferred semantics) can be captured as a form of Socratic discussion, this paper helps to bridge the gap between formal and informal argumentation, and contributes to Explainable AI in the context of formal argumentation. Follow-up work includes an online demonstrator (http://disco.cs.cf.ac.uk) and a chapter in the Handbook of Formal Argumentation (978-1-84890-275-6). This work also inspired a self-funded PhD student to examine discussion-based approaches for human-computer interaction in the context of formal argumentation.
- Author contribution statement
- -
- Non-English
- No
- English abstract
- -
