Dominant frames in legacy and social media
coverage of the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report
- Submitting institution
-
University of Exeter
- Unit of assessment
- 11 - Computer Science and Informatics
- Output identifier
- 4851
- Type
- D - Journal article
- DOI
-
10.1038/nclimate2535
- Title of journal
- Nature Climate Change
- Article number
- -
- First page
- 380
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 1758-678X
- Open access status
- Out of scope for open access requirements
- Month of publication
- March
- Year of publication
- 2015
- URL
-
-
- Supplementary information
-
-
- Request cross-referral to
- -
- Output has been delayed by COVID-19
- No
- COVID-19 affected output statement
- -
- Forensic science
- No
- Criminology
- No
- Interdisciplinary
- No
- Number of additional authors
-
4
- Research group(s)
-
-
- Citation count
- 87
- Proposed double-weighted
- No
- Reserve for an output with double weighting
- No
- Additional information
- This article was interdisciplinary and published in a high-impact journal, generating media attention and establishing a framework for understanding media framing of climate change. Results were presented to a World Bank meeting about climate communication (“Connect4Climate”, 2015), and circulated to the UK Government Departments DECC and Defra. The paper raised issues with media coverage of the IPCC Report that were referred to in the election campaign for the Chair of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in 2015 (https://www.carbonbrief.org/the-carbon-brief-interview-jean-pascal-van-ypersele). The study was reported in a number of prominent environmental blogs and news websites: SkepticalScience, Phys.org, Grist, ClimateCentral, DeSmogBlog, RespondingToClimateChange, CarbonBrief.
- Author contribution statement
- -
- Non-English
- No
- English abstract
- -