After Hastings: William the Conqueror’s Invasion Campaign, 15 October-25 December 1066
- Submitting institution
-
Canterbury Christ Church University
- Unit of assessment
- 28 - History
- Output identifier
- U28.004
- Type
- D - Journal article
- DOI
-
10.1484/J.VIATOR.5.115980
- Title of journal
- Viator
- Article number
- -
- First page
- 139-178
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 2031-0234
- Open access status
- Access exception
- Month of publication
- -
- Year of publication
- 2017
- URL
-
-
- Supplementary information
-
-
- Request cross-referral to
- -
- Output has been delayed by COVID-19
- No
- COVID-19 affected output statement
- -
- Forensic science
- No
- Criminology
- No
- Interdisciplinary
- No
- Number of additional authors
-
0
- Research group(s)
-
-
- Proposed double-weighted
- Yes
- Double-weighted statement
- This article is a longer-form example, exceeding 25,000 words (including footnotes). Based on extensive research and a substantial range of primary and secondary sources, it demonstrates in-depth analysis and reinterpretion of the direction and purpose of the Norman army’s march through south-east England in 1066. It engages extensively with historiography and critically considers a complex and wide-ranging body of evidence including Domesday Book, chronicles and other primary texts, the nature of the settlements visited by the Normans, the needs and experiences of marching armies from Roman times to the late Middle Ages, the transportation network, the landscape, and weather conditions.
- Reserve for an output with double weighting
- No
- Additional information
- -
- Author contribution statement
- -
- Non-English
- No
- English abstract
- -