Justice and Non-Human Beings, Part 1and Part II
- Submitting institution
-
University of Wales Trinity Saint David / Prifysgol Cymru Y Drindod Dewi Sant
- Unit of assessment
- 31 - Theology and Religious Studies
- Output identifier
- Humphrys2
- Type
- D - Journal article
- DOI
-
-
- Title of journal
- Bangladesh Journal of Bioethics
- Article number
- -
- First page
- 1 & 44
- Volume
- 7 & 8
- Issue
- 3 &1
- ISSN
- 2226-9231
- Open access status
- Compliant
- Month of publication
- January
- Year of publication
- 2017
- URL
-
-
- Supplementary information
-
-
- Request cross-referral to
- -
- Output has been delayed by COVID-19
- No
- COVID-19 affected output statement
- -
- Forensic science
- No
- Criminology
- No
- Interdisciplinary
- No
- Number of additional authors
-
1
- Research group(s)
-
-
- Proposed double-weighted
- No
- Reserve for an output with double weighting
- No
- Additional information
- Humphreys, R. with Robin Attfield (2016/17):
‘Justice and Non-Human Beings’, Part I, in Bangladesh Jrn. of Bioethics (7:3), 2016, pp.1-11. https://doi.org/10.3329/bioethics.v7i3.30949
Justice and Non-Human Beings’, Part II, in Bangladesh Jrn. of Bioethics (8:1), 2017, pp.44-77. https://doi.org/10.3329/bioethics.v8i1.31082
These two papers comprise one single output. Originally, the paper submitted to the journal was one longer paper, which was subsequently divided into two shorter papers for ease of reading by the editor of the journal. The first provides the theoretical background, showing why traditional theories of justice are problematic; the second presents the emerging argument as to why duties justice of justice and of morality need to be brought into line. This is as true for traditional theories as it is for non-traditional ones. In summary, to reach this conclusion, both papers need to be taken together.
- Author contribution statement
- -
- Non-English
- No
- English abstract
- -