Characteristics of multiple viewpoints in abstract argumentation
- Submitting institution
-
The University of Liverpool
- Unit of assessment
- 11 - Computer Science and Informatics
- Output identifier
- 12030
- Type
- D - Journal article
- DOI
-
10.1016/j.artint.2015.07.006
- Title of journal
- ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
- Article number
- -
- First page
- 153
- Volume
- 228
- Issue
- -
- ISSN
- 0004-3702
- Open access status
- Out of scope for open access requirements
- Month of publication
- July
- Year of publication
- 2015
- URL
-
-
- Supplementary information
-
-
- Request cross-referral to
- -
- Output has been delayed by COVID-19
- No
- COVID-19 affected output statement
- -
- Forensic science
- No
- Criminology
- No
- Interdisciplinary
- No
- Number of additional authors
-
3
- Research group(s)
-
-
- Citation count
- 26
- Proposed double-weighted
- No
- Reserve for an output with double weighting
- No
- Additional information
- This article extends a conference paper published in KR'14. The paper initiated the study of realisability in abstract argumentation frameworks, as discussed by Strass (JAIR'15). The techniques have been applied to argument rejection, including extension removal and forgetting by Baumann and others (AAAI'19 and '20). The paper also directly influenced new research directions, including merging and synthesis of argumentation frameworks (Delobelle et al, KR'16 and Niskanen et al, JAIR'19, respectively), and the analysis of 3-valued semantics in abstract argumentation frameworks (Puhrer, AIJ'20). The technique has also been adopted in the case of infinite structures (Baumann and Spanring, IJCAI'17).
- Author contribution statement
- -
- Non-English
- No
- English abstract
- -