Nineteenth-Century Music Review (17) Special Issue 3: The Experience of Listening to Music in the Nineteenth Century
- Submitting institution
-
The Open University
- Unit of assessment
- 33 - Music, Drama, Dance, Performing Arts, Film and Screen Studies
- Output identifier
- 1685646
- Type
- B - Edited book
- DOI
-
-
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- ISBN
- 0000000000
- Open access status
- -
- Month of publication
- December
- Year of publication
- 2020
- URL
-
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/nineteenth-century-music-review/issue/36E8FA68462450CAF60B6CECFAB38585
- Supplementary information
-
-
- Request cross-referral to
- -
- Output has been delayed by COVID-19
- No
- COVID-19 affected output statement
- -
- Forensic science
- No
- Criminology
- No
- Interdisciplinary
- No
- Number of additional authors
-
1
- Research group(s)
-
-
- Proposed double-weighted
- No
- Reserve for an output with double weighting
- No
- Additional information
- This special issue on nineteenth-century listening history was based on ideas developed at two events devised and organised by Barlow in 2017 which included presentations by all of the special issue authors: a seminar including Prof Dave Russell at the Royal College of Music and a round table presentation attended by the journal’s editor at the Music in Nineteenth-Century Britain conference. The five authors are all members or emeritus members of the Open University Music Department. Barlow, Herbert and Rowland were members of two AHRC-funded projects which fed directly into the collection: AH/J013986/1 The Listening Experience Database and AH/N006720/1 Listening and British cultures: listeners’ responses to music in Britain, c. 1700-2018. Clarke was a co-investigator on the second of these projects and Golding was invited to contribute because her research focused on a closely related area.
Barlow’s main contributions to the journal issue itself were authorship of one article and co-authorship (50%, with Herbert) of the Introduction, which positions the project within a range of disciplines and sub-disciplines. She was responsible for 60% of the editorial work on the articles, which included contributing to the intellectual shaping of all authors’ contributions both prior to, and after, the journal’s peer review process, as well as drawing out connections between the contributions. She was responsible for corresponding with the journal’s editor, dealing with page proofs, and liaising with the editor, copy editor and production manager of the journal.
- Author contribution statement
- -
- Non-English
- No
- English abstract
- -
