Relocation disputes: law and practice in England and New Zealand
- Submitting institution
-
University College London
- Unit of assessment
- 18 - Law
- Output identifier
- 3484
- Type
- A - Authored book
- DOI
-
-
- Publisher
- Hart Publishing
- ISBN
- 9781782252177
- Open access status
- -
- Month of publication
- January
- Year of publication
- 2014
- URL
-
-
- Supplementary information
-
-
- Request cross-referral to
- -
- Output has been delayed by COVID-19
- No
- COVID-19 affected output statement
- -
- Forensic science
- No
- Criminology
- No
- Interdisciplinary
- No
- Number of additional authors
-
0
- Research group(s)
-
-
- Proposed double-weighted
- Yes
- Double-weighted statement
- This 210-page monograph draws on over 550,000 words of qualitative data from 44 interviews with legal professionals in England and New Zealand (a longer-form output … demonstrating an extended or complex piece of research; the collection and analysis of a large body of material), as part of a 3-year research project (sustained research effort). Interviews required extensive time to arrange and global travel, and these empirical data are woven together with extensive archival research into the history of relocation law in two jurisdictions (critical insight and argument which was dependent upon the completion of a lengthy period of data collection).
- Reserve for an output with double weighting
- No
- Additional information
- Some material in Chapter 3 of this book was published in ‘Practitioners’ Views on Children’s Welfare in Relocation Disputes: Comparing Approaches in England and New Zealand’ [2011] Child and Family Law Quarterly 178 (submitted to REF2014). In the previous article, the same data are used, with some overlapping analysis including graphic illustrations on predicted outcomes of three case studies. However, the book analyses the data at greater length (10,891 words, against 8,167 in the article) and uses further empirical data to develop a comprehensive, distinctive thesis across six chapters comparing relocation law in England & Wales and New Zealand.
- Author contribution statement
- -
- Non-English
- No
- English abstract
- -
