The impact of Thinking-Aloud on usability inspection
- Submitting institution
-
University of Sunderland
- Unit of assessment
- 11 - Computer Science and Informatics
- Output identifier
- 1304
- Type
- E - Conference contribution
- DOI
-
10.1145/3397876
- Title of conference / published proceedings
- Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
- First page
- 1
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 88
- ISSN
- 2573-0142
- Open access status
- Compliant
- Month of publication
- June
- Year of publication
- 2020
- URL
-
http://sure.sunderland.ac.uk/id/eprint/12065/
- Supplementary information
-
-
- Request cross-referral to
- -
- Output has been delayed by COVID-19
- No
- COVID-19 affected output statement
- -
- Forensic science
- No
- Criminology
- No
- Interdisciplinary
- Yes
- Number of additional authors
-
2
- Research group(s)
-
-
- Citation count
- -
- Proposed double-weighted
- No
- Reserve for an output with double weighting
- No
- Additional information
- The valuable results of this first experimental transfer of resources from usability testing to inspection methods can be expected to significantly change professional practice and HCI teaching, by assisting analysts to better use their existing knowledge and expertise by engaging in more reflection within usability inspection work. It is a novel application of resource theory (developed by Cockton, Woolrych and others within the COST MAUSE and TwinTide actions), building on longstanding research at Sunderland to create synergies between two previously disparate areas (usability testing, usability inspection) with worthwhile outcomes for user experience work.
- Author contribution statement
- -
- Non-English
- No
- English abstract
- -