Using argument notation to engineer biological simulations with increased confidence
- Submitting institution
-
University of Keele
- Unit of assessment
- 11 - Computer Science and Informatics
- Output identifier
- 369
- Type
- D - Journal article
- DOI
-
10.1098/rsif.2014.1059
- Title of journal
- Journal of The Royal Society Interface
- Article number
- 20141059
- First page
- 1
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 104
- ISSN
- 1742-5689
- Open access status
- Out of scope for open access requirements
- Month of publication
- March
- Year of publication
- 2015
- URL
-
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsif.2014.1059
- Supplementary information
-
-
- Request cross-referral to
- -
- Output has been delayed by COVID-19
- No
- COVID-19 affected output statement
- -
- Forensic science
- No
- Criminology
- No
- Interdisciplinary
- Yes
- Number of additional authors
-
5
- Research group(s)
-
-
- Citation count
- 11
- Proposed double-weighted
- No
- Reserve for an output with double weighting
- No
- Additional information
- Polack developed argumentation of fitness for purpose (FFP) as a validation approach for complex sysetms simulation in the CoSMoS project (EP/E053505/1). The paper explains the approach to laboratory scientists, via one of its immune system simulations. The approach also appears in Polack and Stepney, Engineering Simulations as Scientific Instruments (2019) ISBN 978-3-030-01938-9, and has been commercialised in the Reason tool distributed by Simomics Ltd as part of its model evidence platform (www.simomics.com/reason : CTO Jon Timmis: contact@simomics.com). Most recently, Polack, working with King's London, is designing a new approach to simulation development centred on fitness for purpose (10.1145/3426425.3426929)
- Author contribution statement
- -
- Non-English
- No
- English abstract
- -