Look Who's Talking: Evaluating the Utility of Interventions During an Interactive Think-Aloud
- Submitting institution
-
University of Sunderland
- Unit of assessment
- 11 - Computer Science and Informatics
- Output identifier
- 742
- Type
- D - Journal article
- DOI
-
10.1093/iwc/iwv014
- Title of journal
- Interacting with Computers
- Article number
- -
- First page
- 387
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 0953-5438
- Open access status
- Out of scope for open access requirements
- Month of publication
- May
- Year of publication
- 2016
- URL
-
http://sure.sunderland.ac.uk/id/eprint/5620/
- Supplementary information
-
-
- Request cross-referral to
- -
- Output has been delayed by COVID-19
- No
- COVID-19 affected output statement
- -
- Forensic science
- No
- Criminology
- No
- Interdisciplinary
- Yes
- Number of additional authors
-
2
- Research group(s)
-
-
- Citation count
- 4
- Proposed double-weighted
- No
- Reserve for an output with double weighting
- No
- Additional information
- This study identified a range of useful and unhelpful probes that practitioners can use during a concurrent think-aloud, but with potential risks to validity that could not be outweighed by larger more significant problem yields. The findings were translated into a practical professional training course on the use of think-alouds in usability testing designed and delivered by co-author Zhao to: Government Digital Service, the Home Office; Habito and at public events. This research underpins an Impact Case Study submission.
- Author contribution statement
- -
- Non-English
- No
- English abstract
- -