Impact case study database
Search and filter
Filter by
- The University of Birmingham
- 24 - Sport and Exercise Sciences, Leisure and Tourism
- Submitting institution
- The University of Birmingham
- Unit of assessment
- 24 - Sport and Exercise Sciences, Leisure and Tourism
- Summary impact type
- Societal
- Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
- No
1. Summary of the impact
Changes to online safety legislation, education and teacher/coach professional training have led to young people optimising the benefits of digital technologies and social media for physical activity and being protected from accessing unsafe digital material. We have stimulated and informed policy change which has led to the appointment of a national online regulator as well as an overhaul of the national school curriculum for Personal, Social and Health Education (PSHE). The impact is national, extending to over 7 million youth, c.4000 physical activity and health organisations and c.100,000 international teachers and coaches. Furthermore, working collaboratively with key organisations (e.g., ukactive, The Football Association), professional standards and best practices have been revised by the creation of new guidelines, professional training programmes and safeguarding practices.
2. Underpinning research
Our body of work has provided robust scientific evidence on the benefits and harms of the digital age for young people. The original contribution is that the findings are, for the first time, grounded in evidence of youth perspectives. The specific and novel focus was on co-producing new knowledge with youth to explain what and how they learn in digital health contexts, and, in turn, the offline educative support they require from relevant adults to maximise benefits and mitigate risks. Overall, the research enhances adults’ abilities to make informed decisions about how to protect youth from health-related risks and maximise the benefits of the digital age.
The main empirical research was undertaken between 2015–2019 in collaboration with: (i) young people (n=1691; age 13–18; across the UK) to examine the types of physical activity, diet/nutrition and body image information young people access and use from social media, apps and wearable devices, and why; (ii) practitioners/professionals, within a network of 35 international researchers, teachers, health and technology professionals, and policy makers to understand how relevant adults can provide support; (iii) 2 national professional development providers to influence the content and design of teacher and coach professional development.
Key Findings
Young People
The data revealed new evidence on how digital spaces educate young people: 5 forms of digital content influenced young people’s learning in digital spaces: peer content (e.g., selfies); reputable accounts (e.g., ‘celebrities’, government); recommended content (e.g., YouTube); commercial content and ‘likes’ influenced young people to engage with health information in different ways. [R1]
In contrast to previous evidence and popular opinion, findings showed that young people are critical and highly self-aware users and generators of digital mediums: Most young people could evaluate the types of content that were relevant to their needs and disregard content that had the potential to lead to harm. Young people were highly self-aware of their own vulnerabilities and recognised that digital engagement can magnify those vulnerabilities, posing additional health-related risks. The context in which social media is used is important, where peers, family members and schools are powerful influencers. [R2]
Practitioners/Professionals
New evidence is provided on what support young people want and need in schools: Personal, Social and Health Education (PSHE) and Physical Education (PE) were identified as primary contexts in which to provide media literacy education that helps young people to navigate age-appropriate content, and in a way that reaches all young people (from diverse contexts). [R3]
Digital Technology Companies/Social Media were identified as essential for offering online support, and this is often lost in discourse about support and risk: Social media/technology companies provide online education and include filters and restrictions to protect the safety of younger users. [R4]
Professional Development Providers
Findings furthered the importance of focusing on inclusion in teacher/coach professional development: Professional development provision should focus on inclusive practices to help teachers and coaches engage with the complexity and diversity of young people’s digital needs. [R5]
Findings from youth provided new understandings into safeguarding issues: Safeguarding issues related to young people’s engagement will ensure that young people receive appropriate support from adults. [R6]
3. References to the research
Goodyear, V.A., Armour, K.M., and Wood, H. (2019) ‘Young people and their engagement with health-related social media: new perspectives’, Sport, Education and Society, 24(7): 673–688. DOI: 10.1080/13573322.2017.1423464
Goodyear, V.A., Armour, K.M., and Wood, H. (2019) ‘Young people learning about health: the role of apps and wearable devices’, Learning, Media and Technology, 44(2): 193–210. DOI: 10.1080/17439884.2019.1539011
Goodyear, V.A., and Armour, K.M., eds (2019) Young People, Social Media and Health (London: Routledge) Open Access. https://www.routledge.com/Young-People-Social-Media-and-Health/Goodyear-Armour/p/book/9781138493957 ISBN: 9781138493957
Goodyear, V.A., Armour, K.M., and Wood, H. (2018). ‘The impact of social media on young people’s health and wellbeing: evidence, guidelines and actions’ (Birmingham, UK: University of Birmingham). DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.16487.75684
Makopoulou, K. (2018) ‘An investigation into the complex process of facilitating effective professional learning: CPD tutors’ practices under the microscope’, Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 23(3): 250–266. DOI: 10.1080/17408989.2017.1406463
Goodyear, V.A. (2017) ‘Social media, apps, and wearable technologies: navigating ethical dilemmas and procedures’, Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 9(3): 285–302. DOI: 10.1080/2159676X.2017.1303790
4. Details of the impact
Impacts on public policy has led to the regulation of social media companies in the UK
**Policy decisions and changes to legislation have been informed by our research evidence which was important in drafting and developing the intermediate bill on online harms in the UK in 2020 [R4]. Our contribution to policy development was pivotal as we were the only academics guiding parliamentarians with evidence co-produced with young people and on youth perspectives on digital health learning.
Evidence provided by Goodyear to the Chief Medical Officer roundtable on screen time and social media use [R4] was explicitly reported in the preceding White Paper (E1, Box 11). Based on concerns about online safety for young people outlined in E1, the Online Harms Bill called for the appointment of Ofcom as an online regulator for social media. This directly reflects the oral and written evidence [R4] provided by Goodyear in the House of Commons to the All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) on Social Media and Young People’s Mental Health and Wellbeing [E3, paras 17,18]. This led to the recommendation that social media companies establish a duty of care to include new filters and restrictions on content [E4].
This is a shift in policy debate and interest by government, and is significant because our research highlighted to parliamentarians a new issue of concern. Prior to this intervention, social media were regulated under the broad category of the Internet, and there was no regulator or legislation of the practices of social media companies in the UK related to online harms. The change has national reach where it impacts on 71% of young people in the UK (approx. 7.3 million age 10–19; Statista, 2018), who are reported to be active users of social media (Ofcom, 2019).
Impacts on learning by policy changes to the national school curriculum
In 2020, Personal, Social and Health Education (PSHE) was made a mandatory subject in 20,202 UK state schools. Furthermore, the content of the curriculum was changed to include a new focus on age-appropriate digital content, digital literacy, and online safety education — in relation to health, e.g., body image and social media (Department for Education (DfE) 2019).
Both these changes to educational policy were directly informed by our research [R3] and follow recommendations made by Goodyear to the Science and Technology Committee (STC) in the form of written evidence [E5, para 21], and in responses made during oral evidence in the House of Commons [E6, Q298–300; E4, paras 19, 145, 153]. Based on this evidence, the STC made the following recommendation:
We recommend that PSHE education be made mandatory for primary and secondary school children in the next parliamentary session and that the PSHE curriculum delivers an age-appropriate understanding of, and resilience towards, the harms and benefits of the digital world. [E4, para 149]
The APPG also made the recommendation that PSHE should be mandatory and include a focus on health-related harms and benefits of social media use [E2, para 5.1]. This statement echoes the oral evidence provided by Goodyear based on R1 to the House of Commons [E2, paras 3–5] and documented in a report from the APPG [E2, key finding, p. 5]. Finally, The Youth Select Committee recommended that media literacy for body image should be taught in PSHE [E7, paras 12, 13], again drawing on written evidence based on R2 provided by Goodyear and Armour.
Informed by the research evidence [R3], the statutory guidelines have changed, so that they now require that pupils should know about comparisons with others online and how using social media can lead to the development of an unrealistic body image (DfE, 2019, p. 36), how relationships on social media develop (DfE, 2019, p. 36), why age restrictions exist for content and platforms (DfE, 2019, p. 32) and the positive impacts of social media on relationships and health behaviours (DfE, 2019, p. 36). In addition, the need for teaching different content related to social media for primary and secondary school pupils was accepted (DfE, 2019). These changes reached, at a minimum, the 8 million pupils in state school education (DfE, 2019). Pre-2020, PSHE digital literacy and health education were not statutory requirements (PSHE Association, 2018).
Influencing professional standards by informing best practice
Professional bodies have been influenced by our research and have developed best practices and guidelines for informing and training teachers and coaches who have a responsibility for young people’s health and wellbeing.
As an example, ukactive recently published national guidelines on healthy lifestyle behaviours, and our evidence [R1, R2] on social media and physical activity education were cited as an example of best practice [E8]. The guidelines were sent to 4,000 ukactive member organisations (i.e., physical activity organisations with a typical minimum membership of 100 individuals), which has subsequently impacted on how technology is used pedagogically. For example, the research evidence [R4] informed the development of a mobile gaming app by Rocket Impact — a technology start-up company — to encourage physical activity, which is now commercially available across the UK [E8].
Similarly, our evidence on inclusion [R5] was included in the design of continuing professional development with Activity Alliance who changed their professional training/development workshops for teachers to include a focus on inquiry in inclusion [E9]. This has impacted on c.14,500 UK teachers and c.340,000 young people. Guidelines have since been adopted by 30 workshop tutors, who deliver training to c.900 teachers per year; this impacts on c.50,000 young people.
Finally, safeguarding practices have been changed at The Football Association (FA) to address potential risks for the online safety of youth sport coaches. The FA stated:
[Griffiths’ and Goodyear’s] body of work [R6] helped us to [… be] more aware of the need to manage individuals who are over and under 16 in digital spaces [… and] define better working practices with regards to education and digital/online safeguarding principles as they relate to Football. [E10]
This change to practice and has impacted on the learning of over 6,000 international sport coaches from 155 different countries [E10]. The FA have since adopted these safeguarding principles for their online training platform that reaches 80,000 football coaches, with 30,000 working with 5–11 age groups [E10].
5. Sources to corroborate the impact
E1. HM Government, Online Harms White Paper April 2019 (CP 57)
E2. Report from the All Party Parliamentary Group on Social Media and Young People’s Mental Health and Wellbeing Inquiry: “Managing the Impact of Social Media on Young People’s Mental Health and Wellbeing” – #NewFilters to manage the impact of social media on young people’s mental health and wellbeing, 2019
E3. Written evidence submitted to All Party Parliamentary Group on Social Media and Young People’s Mental Health and Wellbeing Inquiry
E4. Science and Technology Committee, Impact of social media and screen-use on young people’s health, 31 January 2019, HC 822, 2017-19
E5. Written evidence submitted to Science and Technology Committee Impact of social media and screen-use on young people’s health inquiry, submitted by the University of Birmingham (SMH0098)
E6. Transcript of oral evidence submitted to Science and Technology Committee Impact of social media and screen-use on young people’s health inquiry, questions 214 – 352 (including Goodyear)
E7. British Youth Council – Youth Select Committee 2017, A Body Confident Future
E8. Testimonial from ukactive
E9. Testimonial from Activity Alliance [Dated 21 November 2019]
E10. Testimonial from The Football Association [Dated 17 February 2020]
- Submitting institution
- The University of Birmingham
- Unit of assessment
- 24 - Sport and Exercise Sciences, Leisure and Tourism
- Summary impact type
- Societal
- Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
- No
1. Summary of the impact
Empowering Coaching™ practices have been adopted by individuals and sports organisations in 13 countries across the world and positively influenced the knowledge and practice of over 2,500 practitioners globally. Empowering CoachingTM focuses on mastery and personal improvement, providing ‘voice and choice’ to participants, with care and respect. The promotion of more empowering environments has enhanced the participation, health and well-being of 25,000+ young people in sport and educational settings. In addition, working in youth sport, we have influenced best practice through collaborations with public bodies, associations and NGOs regarding empowering and disempowering behaviours and their effects, and how best to assess coaching and teaching environments.
2. Underpinning research
The Empowering Coaching™ training programme was developed from our new model of coach behaviour that describes the characteristics of empowering (and disempowering) motivational environments along with the expected outcomes from each type of environment [R1, R2]. It aims to inform coaches on what behaviours are empowering and disempowering, and why. The training facilitates coaches and teachers to reflect on their own behaviours and then develop the awareness, confidence, and commitment to become more empowering when engaging with athletes and students.
We developed and validated questionnaires to measure athletes’, students’, and coaches’ perceptions of how empowering or disempowering their environment is [R3], along with an observational tool which assesses the behaviours of coaches [R4]. This multi-method approach was then used to determine the overall effectiveness of the Empowering Coaching™ training programme. The results indicated that empowering coaches focus on mastery and personal improvement, provide ‘voice and choice’ to participants, and are caring and respectful. In contrast, when coaches are controlling, intimidating and emphasise being better than others rather than doing one’s best, they are disempowering.
Overall, we have shown that empowering environments are predictive of greater autonomous motivation [R2, R5] and link to more positive engagement in sport with greater levels of physical activity and reported well-being [R2, R6]. When coaches or teachers are disempowering, these positive outcomes are unlikely to emerge and athletes and students become more likely to report diminished well-being and intentions to drop out [R2].
Importantly, these findings are consistent whether the motivational climate is assessed via questionnaire administered to athletes or students, coaches or teachers or when the motivational climate is assessed via observation [R5].
Key Findings (KFs)
KF1: The use of questionnaires and observational systems provides an effective means to assess both empowering and disempowering features of coach behaviours [R3, R4].
KF2: Empowering behaviour leads to increased autonomous reasons for participation whereas disempowering coaching behaviour results in athletes/students reporting they are not motivated at all [R1, R2, R5].
KF3: An empowering coaching environment is directly linked to more positive engagement and well-being [R1, R2, R6].
KF4: The training programme Empowering Coaching™ promotes coaches’ empowering behaviours and diminishes disempowering motivational climates [R1, R2, R3, R4].
3. References to the research
Underpinning Research Outputs:
R1: Duda, J. L. (2013). The conceptual and empirical foundations of Empowering Coaching™: Setting the stage for the PAPA project. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 11(4), 311–318. doi: 10.1080/1612197X.2013.839414
R2: Duda, J. L., & Appleton, P. R. (2016). Empowering and disempowering coaching behaviour: Conceptualization, measurement considerations, and intervention implications. In M. Raab, P. Wylleman, R. Seiler, A-M. Elbe & A. Harzigeorgiadis (eds), Sport and Exercise Psychology Research: From Theory to Practice. Elsevier.
R3: Appleton, P., Ntoumanis, N., Quested, E., Viladrich, C., & Duda, J. L. (2016). Initial validation of the coach-created Empowering and Disempowering Motivational Climate Questionnaire (EDMCQ-C). Psychology of Sport & Exercise, 22, 53–65. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.05.008
R4: Smith, N., Tessier, D., Tzioumakis, Y., Quested, E., Appleton, P., Sarrazin, P., Papaioannou, A., & Duda, J. L. (2014). Development and validation of the Multidimensional Motivational Observation System. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 37(1), 4–22. doi: 10.1123/jsep.2014-0059
R5: Smith, N., Tessier, D., Tzioumakis, Y., & Duda, J. L. (2016). The relationship between observed and perceived assessments of the coach-created motivational environment and links to athlete motivation. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 23, 51–63.
doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.11.001
R6: Fenton, S. A. M., Duda J. L., Appleton P. R., & Barrett T. G. (2017). Empowering youth sport environments: Implications for daily moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and adiposity. Journal of Sport and Health Sciences, 6(40), 423–433. doi: 10.1016/j.jsjs.2016.03.006
Key Research Grants
Duda, J. L. (PI), & Appleton, P. (Co-investigator). Lead on Monitoring and Evaluation of the ‘Levelling the Playing Field’ project, National Partner for the Alliance of Sport. London Marathon Charitable Trust. January 2020–January 2023, £120,571.
Duda, J. L. (PI) ‘Empowering Coaching in Archery.’ Funded by Archery GB, November 2018–May 2021, £21,350.
Duda, J. L., Cable, T., & Appleton, P. ‘Implications of the motivational climate on athlete motivation, engagement and indicators of psychological and physical functioning.’ Aspire Research Fund, June 2017–December 2019, £115,600.
Duda, J. L., & Appleton, P. ‘“Identifying and Motivating youth who mostly need Physical ACTivity (IMPACT)’ Erasmus+, European Commission, January 2017–December 2019, €29,187.
Appleton, P. (PI), & Duda, J. L. (Co-investigator). ‘The psychological and emotional benefits of playing football on girls and women in Europe.’, Union of European Football Associations (UEFA) November 2016–April 2017, £15,893.
Duda, J. L. (PI) To enhance dissemination and impact building from our previously funded ‘Empowering Coaching in Doorstep Sport’ project. StreetGames, April 2017–March 2018, £20,000.
Duda, J. L. (PI), & Appleton, P. Evaluation of the WRU School Rugby Programme. Funded by the Welsh Rugby Union, February 2015–September 2015, £15,000.
Duda, J. L. (PI), & Appleton, P. (Co-investigator). Empowering Coaching™ for Doorstep Sport. Funded by Coca Cola Foundation, June 2014–March 2016, £137,700.
Appleton, P. (PI), ‘Intentions to drop-out in female footballers from 5 European countries: The role of the coach-created motivational climate.’, Seventh Framework Programme (FP7), European Commission, May 2014, £15,893.
Duda, J. L., (PI), Quested, E., & Appleton, P. Empowering teachers in Wales. Funded by Sport Wales, July 2013–July 2015, £95,000.
4. Details of the impact
Professional training standards of sports coaches have been positively transformed
Empowering Coaching™ practices [KF1, KF4] have been adopted by individuals and organisations across the world, with our training having been delivered in 13 different countries (UK, Brazil, France, Greece, Ireland, Mexico, Norway, Poland, Qatar, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan). The “strong research and theoretical base together with the point that it has been rigorously evaluated” [S1] has led to a range of governing bodies and charities [e.g. S1, S2, S3] incorporating Empowering CoachingTM into their training programmes and qualifications.
The practice and knowledge of practitioners have been positively influenced with a total of 64 tutors across the world having been fully trained to deliver Empowering Coaching™. As of December 2020, it was estimated that these tutors have reached over 2,500 sports coaches and teachers worldwide. Where applicable, a commercial licensing model is used which enables tutors to train more tutors (training-the-trainers) which rapidly embeds and extends Empowering Coaching™. Commercial licences have been awarded to institutions of higher education , sport federations and dance associations in the UK, Brazil, Mexico, Spain and Sweden [e.g. S4]. For example, in 2020, 100 Archery GB coaches/club managers participated in Empowering Coaching™ workshops with a licence agreement now providing more than 2,100 licensed Archery GB coaches and 11,000+ instructors access to the bespoke Empowering Archery™ [S1]. The licencing model has also worked particularly well in assisting translation into foreign language settings where, for example, tutors in Mexico and Brazil have been trained by tutors from Spain originally trained by ourselves. This training-the-trainers model has allowed us to spread the ethos and practice of Empowering CoachingTM globally.
In a further detailed example, we have changed practice in grassroots football as a direct impact of Empowering Coaching™ training. To date, training has been delivered to 521 coaches and their players in England, France, Greece, Norway and Spain [S5]. Post-workshop evaluations of coaches highlighted (on a 5-pt scale) a better understanding of how to become more empowering (M=4.4) along with a commitment to be more empowering (M=4.5) [S7]. The training has led to reported improvements in the motivational climate [KF2] along with reduced intentions to drop out [S5], as testified to by the Union of European Football Associations (UEFA):
[The] underlying research and evidence for the impact of Empowering Coaching™ have informed the vision and coach training strategies of UEFA [and identification of] the environment set by the coach as the most important factor in growing participation and encouraging high performance […The vision is to develop] high-quality education opportunities […] for grassroots coaches, teachers and parents, with a focus on providing the skills and knowledge to create an empowering environment for all players. [S3]
Improving the environment of youth sport to enhance health and wellbeing
We have collaborated with public bodies, associations, and NGOs, in numerous countries, to improve the best practice of coaches and teachers to provide an empowering environment for young people [KF2, KF3]. The result is that the principles underpinning Empowering Coaching™ are now widely adopted across Youth Sport. International examples include:
Duda was invited by the Swiss Federal Institute of Sport to provide expertise with regard to the benefits of an empowering motivational climate in youth sport. This has resulted in assessments grounded in the Empowering Coaching™ model being embedded in the evaluation process of Switzerland’s National Youth+Sport Programme [S8].
Inclusion of Empowering Coaching™ in the final report of the Safeguarding Youth Sport project as an evidence-based exemplar of ‘good practice’ contributing to the creation of “positive ethical climates in sport organisations” and “the individual empowerment of elite young athletes”. The Safeguarding Youth Sport project was led by the International Centre Ethics in Sport and included 10 partners across 8 EU Member States [S9].
Contributions from Duda as the co-author the ‘Copenhagen Consensus Statement 2016: Children, Youth and Physical Activity in Schools and during Leisure-Time’. The Consensus Statement, directly echoing Duda’s work, made the following recommendation to the Danish Sport and Education Association:
An autonomy supportive, mastery focused and caring/socially supportive environment [i.e., an empowering environment] positively influences children’s self-determined motivation, physical activity behaviour and holistic wellbeing […] systematic and deliberate training enables teachers and coaches to create a positive motivational environment for children and youth. [S10]
The downstream impacts on the health and wellbeing of young people are well exemplified by the contributions of Empowering Coaching™ to Doorstep Sport Clubs in the UK. These are fun, informal sports clubs that operate in a style accessible to disadvantaged youth in deprived areas. Through our collaborative work with the StreetGames charity [S2] and other related projects [S5], the health and well-being of 25,000+ young people have been enhanced via their delivery of the Empowering Coaching™ for Doorstep sport programme to this group:
[the programme] has had a positive impact amongst the participants attending their sessions across a range of aspects, including: enjoyment, inclusion, motivation, competence and confidence [… we have seen] how the coaches/ leaders have been able to put learning from the [ Empowering Coaching™] workshop into practice within their doorstep sport sessions and how it has enhanced their skills. [S2]
5. Sources to corroborate the impact
S1: Testimonial from Hannah Bussey, Coach Workforce Manager, Archery GB. [Dated 10 December 2020]
S2: Empowering Coaching™ for Doorstep Sport Programme, co-developed by StreetGames and University of Birmingham – Case Study and Video [video available on request]
S3: Testimonial from Liam McGroarty, Business Development Manager, National Associations Division, UEFA. [Dated 14 December 2020]
S4: License Agreement with the University Sao Judas Tadeu, Brazil.
S5: Final Report - ‘PAPA (Promoting Adolescent health through an intervention aimed at improving the quality of their participation in Physical Activity)’. Final Report Summary and Project Activity Images
S6: Castillo, I., Ramis, Y., Cruz, J., & Balaguer, I. (2015). Formacion de entrenadores de futbol base en el Projecto PAPA. Revista de Psicologia del Deporte, 24, 131–138. (In Spanish)
S7: Report on the post-workshop quantitative and qualitative feedback across Empowering Coaching™ deliveries (2014–2020).
S8: Swiss Federal Institute of Sport evaluation approach to the national Youth+Sport program ( Die Wirkevaluation von Jugend+Sport) ( Website in English, report in German) [Accessed 4 February 2021]
S9: International Centre Ethics in Sport. Safeguarding Youth Sport – Booklet: Stimulating the individual empowerment of elite young athletes and a positive ethical climate in sport organisations (2015)
S10: The Copenhagen Consensus Conference 2016: Children, Youth, and Physical Activity in Schools and during Leisure Time. Published by the Copenhagen Centre for Team Sport and Health.
- Submitting institution
- The University of Birmingham
- Unit of assessment
- 24 - Sport and Exercise Sciences, Leisure and Tourism
- Summary impact type
- Societal
- Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
- No
1. Summary of the impact
In a demonstrable collaboration with the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), the sole global agency combating use of prohibited substances and methods in sport, we have helped to transform anti-doping policy and education globally. This has led to changes in educational practices within national anti-doping organisations, resulting in demonstrable changes in the health and wellbeing of athletes. Our other contributions include support for continued professional development of healthcare workers engaging with image and performance enhancing drug users, and changes to the UK clean sport curriculum informed by our research.
2. Underpinning research
The use of doping is a significant global issue in sport and exercise. In sport, Image and Performance Enhancing Drug (IPED) use undermines the principles of fair competition and is therefore, against the rules. Expanding use in exercise and fitness communities is likely to have further, considerable, detrimental effect on population health due to the known impacts on psychological and physical health (UKAD, 2020). Our research has made significant global contributions to empirical enquiry on IPED use in sport and exercise contexts.
Our research has identified psychological factors linked to doping and developed valid and reliable instruments to assess them. Research by Boardley and Kavussanu has linked IPED use in sport and exercise with moral disengagement (MD) [R1, R4]. MD is a collective term for eight psychosocial mechanisms people use to rationalise harmful or transgressive acts such as doping, so that they do not experience unpleasant feelings (e.g., guilt, shame) when engaging in them. Through our research, MD has been positively associated with self-reported doping, susceptibility to doping and doping likelihood. Boardley and Kavussanu have developed and validated four psychometric instruments to assess MD and another to measure doping self-regulatory efficacy (i.e., an athlete’s confidence in his/her ability to resist personal and social inducements to dope) [R3, R4, R5].
We have also developed interventions that reduce athletes’ proclivity to dope. Research by Kavussanu developed a ‘moral’ anti-doping intervention that targeted MD alongside other antecedents of doping, as well as a standard knowledge-based intervention [R2]. The two interventions were delivered to young athletes in the UK and Greece. Evaluation showed the interventions reduced MD and doping likelihood, and increased anticipated guilt with medium-to-large effects. These effects were maintained at three- and six-month follow-ups.
Finally, we established expert consensus on priority areas for research over the next 10 years and used this to create the first agenda for doping prevention research. This was achieved by using a questionnaire approach, followed by the Delphi Method, with relevant experts (i.e., experienced anti-doping practitioners/academics and senior anti-doping governance officers) from 30 countries. The three priority areas identified were:
Effectiveness of anti-doping interventions/education programmes, including development, implementation, and long-term evaluation;
Developmental influences (e.g., parental, peer, school education, etc.) from outside of sport on young athletes regarding doping and clean sport;
The role of athlete support personnel (e.g., coaches, doctors, agents) in anti-doping and clean sport.
These formed the basis of a 10-year plan for research on doping prevention. Potential barriers and facilitators to delivery were also identified [R6].
Key Findings (KF)
KF1 – MD, anticipated guilt and self-regulatory efficacy have strong, consistent links with doping outcomes in sport and exercise and can be reliably assessed using our psychometric instruments [R1, R2, R3, R4, R5].
KF2 – Our anti-doping interventions reduced athletes’ MD and doping likelihood and increased anticipated guilt, from pre- to post-intervention and at six-month follow-up [R2].
KF3 – International expert consensus was established on eight priority topics and 18 priority research questions to be addressed in doping-prevention research over the next 10 years, and, based on these priorities, a research agenda was created [R6].
KF4 – Key barriers and facilitators to delivery of our research agenda for doping prevention were identified [R6].
3. References to the research
[R1] Boardley, I. D., Smith, A. L., Mills, J. P., Grix, J., & Wynne, C. (2017). Empathic and self-regulatory processes governing doping behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1495. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01495
[R2] Kavussanu, M., Hurst, M., Yukhymenko-Lescroart, M., Galanis, E., King, A., Hatzigeorgiadis, A., & Ring. C. (2020). A moral intervention reduces doping likelihood in UK and Greek athletes: Evidence from a cluster randomized control trial. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 1-53
[R3] Boardley, I. D., & Kavussanu, M. (2007). Development and validation of the Moral Disengagement in Sport Scale. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 29, 608–628. doi: 10.1123/jsep.29.5.608
[R4] Kavussanu, M., Hatzigeorgiadis, A., Elbe, A. M., Ring, C. (2016). The moral disengagement in doping scale. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 24, 188–198. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2016.02.003
[R5] Boardley, I. D., Smith, A. L., Mills, J., Grix, J., Wynne, C., & Wilkins, L. (2018). Development of moral disengagement and self-regulatory efficacy assessments relevant to doping in sport and exercise. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 36, 57–70. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.01.007
[R6] Boardley, I., Chandler, M., Backhouse, S. H., & Petroczi, A. (2020, December 3). Co-creating a Social Science Research Agenda for Clean Sport: An International Delphi Study. SportRxiv. doi : 10.31236/osf.io/fr32a (Version 3)
Research Grants:
Erasmus+ Sport Programme (€388,415). Research-Embedded Strategic Plan for Anti-Doping Education: Clean Sport Alliance Initiative for Tackling Doping in Para-Sport (RESPECT-P).
Erasmus+ Sport Programme (€388,028). Research-Embedded Strategic Plan for Anti-Doping Education: Clean Sport Alliance Initiative for Tackling Doping (RESPECT).
Economic and Social Research Council doctoral scholarship (£60,000). Psychosocial Factors Influencing the Harmful Use of PIED in Sport and Exercise.
International Olympic Committee ($367,012). Preventing doping in sport: A moral intervention in young British, Greek, and Italian athletes.
International Olympic Committee ($173,699). Sport Coaches' Doping Confrontation Efficacy and Athletes' Susceptibility to Intentional and Inadvertent Doping.
World Anti-Doping Agency ($85,762). From evidence to application: A psychosocial anti-doping intervention for young athletes.
World Anti-Doping Agency ($65,000). The effects of permitted forms of performance enhancement on determinants of doping in UK student-athletes.
World Anti-Doping Agency ($34,000). Designing and Validating Measures of Doping Moral Disengagement and Self-Regulatory Efficacy and Assessing a Model of Doping Behaviour.
World Anti-Doping Agency ($45,445). A cross-cultural approach to a cross-cultural issue: Psychosocial factors and doping in young athletes.
World Anti-Doping Agency ($30,397). A National Investigation of Psychosocial Factors Facilitating Doping in Bodybuilders.
4. Details of the impact
Impacts on policy and practice by influencing the global governance agency for anti-doping
We have impacted on the policies and practices of the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), the global organisation responsible for promoting, coordinating and monitoring the fight against drugs in sport. WADA is solely responsible for determining the operations of 154 Anti-Doping Organisations (ADOs) operating across the globe. We have specifically impacted on WADA in two key ways:
We have contributed to an extensive review and restructure of WADA’s Social Science Research Program. In particular, we have influenced funding policy and, drawing on University of Birmingham (UoB) Research [KF3, KF4], have enabled WADA to identify “research priorities that will guide investment decisions for the coming four years of the strategy” [E1]. WADA’s Education Senior Manager, attests to our importance in this change, stating that our findings “underpinned the selection of the priorities that were subsequently chosen”, with WADA “already starting to address some of the issues identified in the Barriers and Facilitators section” identified in our work [E1].
We have changed the educational practices of WADA. The psychometric instruments we developed [KF1; E1] have been adopted within the professional standard used to measure athletes’ doping beliefs/behaviours and to assess the general effectiveness of anti-doping programmes. The package was downloaded 1248 times by ADOs between 2017 and 2019 [E2].
This collaboration with WADA has led to changes in educational practices within national ADOs. For example, our intervention research [KF2] has influenced the thinking of the Australian ADO, who “found it invaluable when modelling their evaluation system” [E3]. They have since “adopted components of our interventions” within their anti-doping education programme. Similarly, the Greek ADO considered the interventions “extremely helpful in guiding the design” of their anti-doping programmes [E4]. The associated impact on health and wellbeing of these interventions is evidenced by improved doping attitudes in >500 regional and international athletes from the UK, Greece and Italy [E5]. WADA have also developed an infographic detailing the interventions, to help translate the findings for their stakeholders and encourage their further implementation by practitioners [E6].
Impacts on practitioners by defining anti-doping best practice
We have informed evidence-based practice for anti-doping practitioners by summarising key research evidence and providing examples of best practice through a freely available web resource [E7]. Co-created with five European ADOs, a platform to exchange knowledge between researchers and practitioners was developed to showcase the research agenda that influenced WADA [KF3] and the broader implementation plan [KF4]. The beta version was launched in September 2019 at an International Forum (120 attendees) and presented at UKAD’s Clean Sport Forum (100 attendees) in March 2020. The final version was launched through a global virtual conference in December 2020. Attendees at these events included decision makers and practitioners from the global anti-doping community.
We have also contributed to continuing professional development for healthcare professionals working with IPED users informed by UoB research [KF1]. Through a co-creation process, best practice guidance on delivering services to IPED users was developed. This guidance was summarised in three pamphlets distributed to needle-exchange clinics in the UK and Australia and led to evidenced changes in practice amongst healthcare professionals [E8]. The pamphlets have since been adopted in online training for needle and syringe programme workers by Exchange Supplies, a global enterprise developing products and information for injecting drug users, drug services and needle exchanges [E9].
Impacts on learning and understanding by developing the clean sport curriculum
UKAD’s Clean Sport Curriculum has been informed by our research and includes a dedicated unit, developed by Boardley, based on societal factors [KF1, E10a]. The curriculum forms the basis of UKAD’s Clean Sport Education throughout the UK, influencing five athlete pathways from recreational to elite level [E10b]. Our findings also contributed to Clean Sport Week 2019 through a webinar [KF1]. The webinar had 299 sign-ups, 140 live attendees and a further 58 downloads; 238 people requested further information from UKAD because of the webinar [E10b].
5. Sources to corroborate the impact
[E1] Testimonial from Tony Cunningham, WADA Education Senior Manager. Testimonial confirming the inclusion of our psychometric instruments in the WADA’s ADO Evaluation package and stating the importance of our RESPECT research (i.e., Delphi poll) to the WADA research-funding strategy and evidence-based practice by ADOs. The testimonial also highlights WADA are starting to address some of the issues identified in the Barriers and Facilitators section of our research paper. [Dated 15 December 2020]
[E2] Email from Tony Cunningham, WADA Education Senior Manager confirming the number of times the WADA’s ADO Evaluation package was downloaded between 2017–2019. [Dated 7 February 2020]
[E3] Testimonial from Alexis Cooper, ASADA Director of Education confirming elements of the intervention have been adopted by the Australian National Anti-Doping Organisation. [Dated 13 February 2020]
[E4] Testimonial confirming the intervention has guided the anti-doping programme of the Greek National Anti-Doping Organisation. [Dated 6 April 2020]
[E5] Dataset highlighting improved doping attitudes in athletes [available on request].
[E6] Email from Tony Cunningham, WADA Education Senior Manager confirming the development of infographics detailing the interventions and draft infographic. [Dated 9 October 2020]
[E7] Clean Sport Knowledge Exchange Platform - Bridging the gap between research, policy and practice to develop effective anti-doping education programs by bringing together anti-doping researchers, representatives of anti-doping organisations and athletes.
[E8] Results from post-workshop evaluation and follow-up contact with attendees testifying to the impact on needle-exchange workers’ practice of the action-research workshop and pamphlets generated from it [available on request].
[E9] Email from Andrew Preston, general manager of Exchange Supplies (company supplying products and information for injecting drug users, drug services and needle exchanges nationally and international). [Dated 2 July 2020]
[E10a] UKAD Technical Reference Document, Version 4, [Published 2020] and emails from UKAD confirming numbers of training sessions for educators, and number of educators reached [Dated 19 October 2020] and inviting Boardley to develop the UKAD curriculum [Dated 20 April 2020].
[E10b] Image and Performance Enhancing Drugs: Myth and Reality Webinar hosted on Human Kinetics’ website and email confirming numbers attended and downloaded.
- Submitting institution
- The University of Birmingham
- Unit of assessment
- 24 - Sport and Exercise Sciences, Leisure and Tourism
- Summary impact type
- Societal
- Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
- No
1. Summary of the impact
We have improved social, educational and employment opportunities for 60,000 homeless people across the UK by collaborating with three charitable organisations to co-develop the My Strengths Training for Life™ (MST4Life™) programme and, in doing so, securing them better access to finance opportunities. Participation in MST4Life™, the first sport psychology intervention delivered to homeless young people, has been shown to dramatically increase social welfare and equality for homeless people, increasing the likelihood by 30 percentage points that young people will exit homelessness through education, employment and training. The work has also been translated more broadly, improving the mental health and well-being of 2,380,000 higher education students who now receive access to mental skills training via the Fika app.
2. Underpinning research
Homelessness is a major social issue in the UK, costing the Government over £1b annually and resulting in the large-scale deterioration of mental and physical health along with low life expectancy. Young people aged 16–24 are disproportionately affected, and problems will persist and escalate into adulthood unless those affected are supported to overcome their own multiple and complex barriers. Our research has identified and described the mental skills and practices required to support healthy adolescent development in sport and physical activity, and we have pioneered adapting these approaches to improve the well-being and social inclusion of homeless young people.
Recognising a lack of mental skills as a key factor perpetuating homelessness, Cumming worked in partnership with the St Basils charity between 2014–2020 to co-develop MST4Life™ (MST: My Strengths Training) — the first sport psychology programme delivered within a housing service to homeless young people. St Basils helps over 5,000 young people across the West Midlands each year, including Birmingham — a city whose level of youth homelessness was five times the national average in 2013–2014.
The key research findings underpinning MST4Life are as follows:
KF1: Mental skills are essential if young people are to recover from homelessness, experience well-being and thrive. We have provided evidence of the successful and novel adaptation of using mental skills training to engage socially excluded homeless young people across a wide range of support needs [R1]. We also produced the first research to use a ‘person-centred approach’ with homeless youth, to identify their own personal beliefs and associated mental strengths and to demonstrate that these strengths are associated with increased well-being [R2].
KF2: Young people require a diverse set of personal and interpersonal mental qualities to be successful, and the nature, development and regulation of these qualities depends on features of the surrounding social environment [R3]. The content and delivery style of MST4Life™ was directly informed by research undertaken by Cumming and Duda with the Scottish Institute of Sport Federation and Scottish Rugby (2007–2010), investigating how best to develop, implement and evaluate mental skills training interventions for youth in sport and dance. Significant others (e.g., coaches, parents and sport administrators) play an important role by creating an autonomy-supportive climate for the development and implementation of mental skills and offering meaningful opportunities for the athletes to reflect on experiences [R4].
KF3: Using unfamiliar and challenging environments can be beneficial when providing mental skills training. The ‘Messing About on the River’ project (2011–2012), co-led by Cumming and Burns, identified the key factors influencing the transfer of mental skills from a training context (e.g., an outdoor adventure education course) to education and work opportunities (e.g. transfer context) for higher education students [R5]. Based on these findings, an outdoor adventure component was embedded within MST4Life™ to provide a meaningful opportunity for young homeless people to practise their self-regulation abilities in an unfamiliar and challenging environment. They were then able to transfer these mental skills back to their supported accommodation environment and take positive steps towards living independently by addressing long standing health issues, becoming more involved with their community, and engaging with education, employment and training opportunities [R6].
3. References to the research
[R1] Cumming, J., Quinton, M. L., & Holland, M. J. G. (2014). Recommendations for enhancing mental skills of young people living at St Basils: Results of a training needs analysis. University of Birmingham, UK: Authors.
[R2] Cooley, S. J., Quinton, M. L., Holland, M. J. G., Parry, B. J., & Cumming, J. (2019). The experiences of homeless youth when using strengths profiling to identify their character strengths. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02036
[R3] Woodcock, C., Holland, M. J. G., Duda, J. L., & Cumming, J. (2011). Psychological Qualities of Elite Adolescent Rugby Players: Parents, Coaches, and Sport Administration Staff Perceptions and Supporting Roles. The Sport Psychologist, 25, 411–443. https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.25.4.411
[R4] Sharp, L., Holland, M. J. G., Woodcock, C., Cumming, J., & Duda, J. L. (2013) A qualitative evaluation of a mental skills training program with youth athletes. The Sport Psychologist, 27, 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.27.3.219
[R5] Cooley, S. J., Cumming, J., Holland, M. J. G., & Burns, V. E. (2015). Developing the Model for Optimal Learning and Transfer (MOLT) following an evaluation of outdoor groupwork skills programmes. European Journal of Training and Development, 39, 104–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-06-2014-0046
[R6] Parry, B. J., Thompson, J. L., Holland, M. J. G., Quinton, M. L., & Cumming, J. (2020). Improving Outcomes in Young People Experiencing Homelessness with My Strengths Training for Life™ (MST4Life™): A Qualitative Realist Evaluation. Children and Youth Services Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105793
Key Research Grants
Cumming, J. (2017–2020). Mental skills training with St Basils. Monday Charitable Trust (sub-contracted by St Basils). £366,000.
Cumming, J. (2014–2017). Mental skills training for St Basils. Monday Charitable Trust (sub-contracted by St Basils). £240,000.
Cumming, J., & Burns, V. E. (2011–2012). Messing about on the river: Evaluating the transfer of skills developed in the outdoors into academia and employment. Higher Education Academy. £6,996.
Duda, J. L., & Cumming, J. (2007–2010). The development and testing of a Mental Skills Training (MST) Programme for Young Male Scottish Rugby Players. Scottish Institute of Sport Federation. £154,647.
4. Details of the impact
Improving social, educational and employment opportunities for homelessness people
By widely collaborating with homelessness charities, we have intensively supported homeless young people in Birmingham and, more broadly, across the UK, transforming their quality of life. We have worked with St Basils to embed MST4Life™ [KF1–KF3] into practice, along with Youth Voice (a national advocacy group for homeless young people) and Homeless Link (a national charity for organisations working directly with people who become homeless in England) to develop a simplified ‘Mental Skills Training Toolkit’ based on MST4Life™. The toolkit has been shared with 40 UK organisations who collectively support over 60,000 young people across the UK [S1]. The training programme is also included in resources for professionals created by the Association for Young People’s Health [S2] and the Young People’s Health Partnership [S3] to address health and social inequalities in vulnerable young people.
MST4Life™ and the Mental Skills Training Toolkit allow the gap to be narrowed between participants and their ‘housed’ peers. MST4Life™ has been shown to improve social welfare and equality by significantly increasing the resilience, educational inclusion and self-worth of individuals [S4]. These benefits are hugely significant given that although 10.5% of the UK’s population is 16–24 years, this age group makes up 21% of the UK’s homeless population. As a group, they face disparate long-term physical and mental health inequalities, including a low age of death (47 years for male; 43 years for women).
Independent evaluation has highlighted that MST4Life™ can secure poverty alleviation by increasing the likelihood that homeless young people transition into education, employment or training and subsequently exit homelessness by 30 percentage points [S5]. In Birmingham, intensive use of the programme by St Basils has contributed to the 37% reduction in Birmingham’s statutory youth homelessness in the period of 2013–2014 to 2017–2018 during a time when the national average increased by 34% [S6]. Improving these outcomes provides public sector savings from forgone tax revenues, unemployment benefits and healthcare costs leading to an estimated lifetime savings of £26m for 1,040 young people who exited homelessness in the first three years of project [S5].
Improving the mental health of young people
The impact of MST4Life™ on individuals is best exemplified by testimony. As one MST4Life™ participant stated:
[MST4Life™] really helped me because with my mental health, I fail to speak out when I’m feeling low and the other day, I had a bit of a rough patch and I knew who to call, because it was, ‘ah I’ve done this, I know who I need when I’m in a crisis, so why am I not doing it?’ And it inspired me to just make that call and it saved a meltdown. [S7]
These mental health benefits can also be translated more broadly. The research underpinning MST4Life™ has been embedded into two apps to improve health and well-being in different settings:
KF2 contributed to an emotional workout fitness app ‘Fika’ to help higher education students to train their mental skills and improve well-being. The app is available to the UK’s population of 2,380,000 higher education students and has been adopted by over 55 organisations and institutions. It has been found to reduce mental health decline and improve well-being and educational attainment in students [S8].
The Covid-19 pandemic has had a disproportionate impact on young people’s mental health and has contributed to high rates of homeless youth (there has been an estimated increase of 36%–47% between 2019 and 2020). In response, we translated KF1 and KF2 to provide the evidence base for ‘matchFit’, an app co-created in partnership with the Street Soccer Foundation, Crisis and Shelter charities. The freely available resource is being used by homeless youth across the country who have faced loneliness, isolation and other difficulties accessing services during lockdown restrictions [S9].
The work of a charitable organisation has been transformed by the research
The success MST4Life™ has been confirmed by its inclusion into St Basils core offer, helping to provide better access to finance opportunities. It has enabled St Basils to win new contracts and grants in excess of £7m to assist with their work, despite this being a time of constrained funding from traditional sources for housing services [S10]. Uses of this funding include:
Appointing new frontline staff, including an in-house clinical psychologist;
Delivering psychologically informed programmes (including MST4Life™) to young people in their service and the staff who support them;
Developing spin-off projects such as a psychologically informed programme (related to MST4Life) for parents of young people as part of upstream prevention of homelessness and winning a contract to deliver in a hospital setting (e.g. Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust);
The production of national recommendations (including MST4Life™) for a pathway out of the youth justice system as part of homelessness prevention.
Overall, MST4Life™ has contributed towards St Basils achieving their: “strategic aim to work with University partners, codify and publish their experiences and practices, and influence policy and commissioning at regional and national levels” [S10].
5. Sources to corroborate the impact
S1: Clarke, F. J., Quinton, M., Parry, B., Fenton, S-J, & Cumming., J. (2020). Closing the knowledge to practice gap: Advancing strengths-based practice in youth homeless services through co-created knowledge translation. University of Birmingham, UK: Authors.
S2: Association for Young People’s Health (n.d.). Addressing Health Inequalities in Homeless Children, Young People and Families: A Learning Resource for Public Health Nurses. Report.
S3: The Young People’s Health Partnership (n.d.). Closing the employment gap for young people: A toolkit for those supporting 16–25 year olds experiencing common mental health problems to gain and stay in work. Report.
S4: Cooley, S. J., Quinton, M. L., Holland, M. J. G., Parry, B. J., & Cumming, J. (2016). MST4Life™ at St Basils: Year 2 report. University of Birmingham, UK: Authors.
S5: Jabbour, L. & Siu, J. (2019). Economic Evaluation of Psychologically Informed Environments: Cost-Benefit Analysis of BOOST and MST4LifeTM Programmes at St. Basils. University of Birmingham, UK: Authors.
S6: Centrepoint: The Youth Homelessness Databank. - Centrepoint’s Youth Homelessness Databank collects local data from across the UK concerning the scale and impact of homelessness among young people. [Accessed 4 February 2021]
S7: Testimonial from a young person who has completed the MST4Life™ programme. This is a copy of the speech written and given by a young person at a symposium event, co-hosted by St Basils and the University of Birmingham (21st April 2016)
S8: Testimonial from Dr Fran Lonstaff, Head of Psychology, Fika.
S9: University of Birminghan press release: matchFit app uses football to provide resources and support to vulnerable groups [Accessed 4 February 2021]
S10: Testimonial from Jean Templeton, CEO of St Basils.