Skip to main

Impact case study database

The impact case study database allows you to browse and search for impact case studies submitted to the REF 2021. Use the search and filters below to find the impact case studies you are looking for.

Search and filter

Filter by

  • Queen Mary University of London
   None selected
  • 26 - Modern Languages and Linguistics
   None selected
   None selected
   None selected
   None selected
   None selected
   None selected
Waiting for server
Download currently selected sections for currently selected case studies (spreadsheet) (generating)
Download currently selected case study PDFs (zip) (generating)
Download tags for the currently selected case studies (spreadsheet) (generating)
Currently displaying text from case study section
Showing impact case studies 1 to 2 of 2
Submitting institution
Queen Mary University of London
Unit of assessment
26 - Modern Languages and Linguistics : A - Linguistics
Summary impact type
Societal
Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
No

1. Summary of the impact

A diverse range of 55 schools/educational institutions, including a national educational charity, benefitted from a new approach to delivering the linguistic concepts mandated by the National Curriculum. Linguistics research at Queen Mary University of London on grammatical diversity fed into training and teaching materials to allow students to create their own languages from scratch, engaging creativity in an area that can be uninspiring and dry. Teachers in the schools changed aspects of how they teach linguistic concepts, and this impacted all stages of school education: phonics (KeyStage1), grammatical terminology (KS2), literacy (library hours at KS3/KS4), conceptual framework teaching (A-Level English KS5), across a range of state, academy and independent schools, and was implemented through CPD, extra-curricular activities and curricular changes.

2. Underpinning research

A body of Queen Mary research has analysed a diverse range of grammatically very different languages (including Kiowa [3.1], Scottish Gaelic [3.2], Dinka [3.5], Fijian [3.6], among many others [3.3, 3.4]) via an approach that treated the surface diversity of the languages as arising from interactions of a number of simple grammatical options. Although the same options are available to all languages, different choices lead to rich grammatical variation. For example, take the order of words in a simple phrase meaning ‘The girl’s book’. Scottish Gaelic, English, and Kiowa make different choices in how they order their versions of this. In English ‘the girl’ precedes ‘book’, in Gaelic, the equivalent follows ‘book’, while in Kiowa, the two may be separated from each other in the sentence. Similarly, different languages grammatically mark different parts of the phrase to signify the possessive meaning. Simplifying, English adds ‘‘s’ to ‘the girl’, Dinka changes the form of the word for ‘book’, while Fijian can change both. A similar approach to language diversity can be applied to language structure at the levels of sounds, words, and meaning. These grammatical differences can be understood as different ‘design choices’ in the different languages and the whole body of research developed a theoretical understanding of what these ‘design choices’ are.

The researchers had the idea of flipping the concept of ‘design choices’, using it not as a theoretical concept to analyse languages, but rather as a way of creating languages, linking it to Adger’s long-standing interest in Constructed Languages (‘Conlangs’, section 4 below). Using languages from Queen Mary research, the department developed training and materials for teachers to use with students to invent languages from scratch. The materials use the relevant linguistic concepts but in a way that allows teachers and students to be creative, as opposed to analytical.

The materials drew directly upon the research on the grammar and morphology of noun phrases that Adger reports in [3.2], which was funded by the Leverhulme Trust. It also drew upon research on the free word order phenomena explored by Adger and Harbour in their AHRC grant, reported in [3.1], and on work researching grammatical number and person (plurals, duals, etc.), reported on in [3.3] and [3.4], funded through Adger and Harbour’s second AHRC grant. Van Urk’s research on Dinka, funded by the NSF, and his later work on Fijian, reported in [3.5] and [3.6] below, fed into the materials on the morphology of number, on the organization of phrases and sentences, and how languages express questions versus statements.

3. References to the research

[3.1] Adger, D., Harbour, D., & Watkins, L. (2009). Mirrors and Microparameters: Phrase Structure beyond Free Word Order (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics). Cambridge University Press. doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511657375

[3.2] Donati, C. (2014). A syntax of substance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2013. Journal of Linguistics, 50(2). doi:10.1017/S0022226714000073

[3.3] Harbour, D. (2016). Impossible Persons. MIT Press. muse.jhu.edu/book/48672.

[3.4] Harbour, D. (2014). Paucity, abundance and the theory of number. Language. 185-229. doi.org/10.1353/lan.2014.0003

[3.5] van Urk, C. (2018). Pronoun copying in Dinka Bor and the copy theory of movement. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 36(3), 937-990. doi.org/10.1007/s11049-017-9384-x

[3.6] Van Urk, C. (2020). Object licensing in Fijian and the role of adjacency. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 38(1), 313-364. doi.org/10.1007/s11049-019-09442-1

Evidence of quality of research

These six references are selected from a larger body of work. They are published by prestigious international publishers who insist on rigorous peer-review (Cambridge University Press, MIT Press), or in highly selective peer-reviewed journals. Much of this work was funded via competitive research funding as follows:

[EQR.3.1] Adger [PI]. (2004-07). Information Structure and Word Order in a Polysynthetic Language. Awarded a grade of Outstanding [APN17572]. AHRC. GBP192,000.

[EQR.3.2] Adger [PI]. (2007-2009). The Grammar-Meaning Connection: Evidence from Scottish Gaelic [F07476Y]. Leverhulme Trust. Major Research Fellowship. GBP118,000.

[EQR.3.3; 3.4] Adger [PI]. (2009-2013). Atomic Linguistic Elements of Phi (ALEPH) [AH/G019274/1]. AHRC. GBP275,541.

[EQR.3.5] Coppe van Urk [Co-I]. (2014-2016). ‘Case Marking and the Left Periphery in Dinka’ [BCS-1440427]. National Science Foundation. USD5,860.

4. Details of the impact

Adger was contacted in 2015 by ITV to design two languages for a fantasy show, Beowulf: Return to the Shieldlands, which aired in 2016 attracting about 2,500,000 viewers where the producer of the shows states:

‘[Adger’s] work was of real benefit to the production team, feeding into the overall production process. It helped to make us aware of the importance of linguistics in building a credible world, as well as influencing choices we made in presentation of the creatures in the series, and helping to create a sense of authenticity in the final product.’ [5.2]

This experience led him in 2016 to develop an undergraduate module on constructing languages based on his own research. Following the success of this, Adger, van Urk and Harbour integrated their research into new teaching materials for KS4 students at a Widening Participation Summer School in 2017 held at Queen Mary. Adger and van Urk then set up the Queen Mary Invented Languages Scheme, with the aim of developing teaching materials and training for all levels of education using the method. The first partnership was developed with the Centre for Literacy in Primary Education (CLPE), a major national educational charity, whose director had become interested in the idea after reading a blog by Adger.

Development of educational training implemented in the National Curriculum

CLPE had identified that a method for improved engagement with both phonics and the grammatical terminology elements of the KS1/KS2 parts of the National Curriculum was needed. CLPE and the Queen Mary team worked together to develop CPD training for primary education (March 13th 2019; March 10th 2020; March 11th 2021 rescheduled due to COVID-19). 15 Primary Schools and other organizations, including international organizations (e.g. Fettes College in Guangzhou, China; the Queen Rania Organization of Jordan), sent individuals to be trained in how to use the technique. CLPE note from their formal evaluation that ‘100% of participants rated the course as effective professional development’ and CLPE further state:

‘we use[d] the results of the research […] in co-creating materials for training primary school teachers […] We are keen to embed this approach in our training and development programme moving forward and after revising and repeating the delivery in 2019/20, the course will be part of our specialist course programme in 2020/21’.

The ‘very positive impact’ of this ‘rich addition to the programme’ has resulted in CLPE integrating it into their specialist course program. These courses are offered each year and function as CLPE’s primary way to provide CPD training to primary schools in particular areas of need [5.1].

Changes in school and public engagement with constructed languages

Adger documented the Beowulf experience in his 2019 popular science book Language Unlimited (approx. 4000 hardback/kindle sales August 2019-2020 [5.2]) and in a number of articles, blogs and podcasts aimed at the general public (YouTube Public Lecture for ABRALIN, BBC Science Focus, Slate, two Psychology Today blogs) and at teachers (a podcast for In Plain Language, articles for E-Magazine, with downloadable materials [5.6], an online discussion for the English Shared Futures conference which involved teachers from Primary to Tertiary education [5.2]). Because the Constructed Languages approach directly engages students’ creativity, it provides a new way to cover the grammatical aspects of the National Curriculum which teachers and their advocates have found dry and challenging to engage with (e.g. Rosen, The Guardian). This meant that teachers who had found out about the project via the book, articles, blogs, twitter and podcasts, spread the word, leading to further partnerships (e.g. Letters from Farnborough College, Bilborough [5.4]).

By June 2020, a diverse range of 55 Schools and educational organisations (including CLPE) have benefitted from the Queen Mary Constructed Languages approach in different ways [5.3 provides an index of activities, schools and evidence; 5.4 provides letters from Schools detailing their engagement and/or listing other schools that have taken part in projects they convened; 5.5 provides evaluation forms where available as further feedback]:

  1. enhancing CPD programmes by integrating Constructed Languages sessions (CLPE involving 15 schools, e.g. Eltham School, Farnborough Academy)

  2. sending students to specialised workshops (e.g. Bath High, Putney High)

  3. establishing Constructed Language activities to enrich extra-curricular offerings (e.g. Woodbridge School’s World Book Day, Christ College Finchley’s two-day workshop)

  4. using Queen Mary materials to provide new ways of learning in outreach events (e.g. Westminster School’s Platform Plus, involving seven other schools; Sutton School’s Languages Festival, involving eight other schools; INSET day at Queen Mary with seven schools)

  5. using materials for supporting curricular learning through student projects (Hailyborough High, Queens College).

Enhanced pupil engagement and improved teaching materials

Some schools have engaged in different ways. Uxbridge Academy in 2019 used Queen Mary research to develop ongoing legacy materials for the Frameworks section of A-level English Language (KS5), with teachers commenting ‘this has led to measurable improvements in student engagement and results’. Following a CPD session, Farnborough College found the method ‘so inspiring that we decided to integrate the ideas into our English Language A-level curriculum as part of the Language Frameworks topic’ and commented that it was especially helpful for ‘new teachers and those with a non-linguistic background to develop their subject knowledge further’ [5.4]. The lessons (due to take place in May/June 2020) were postponed to May/June 2021 because of COVID-19. Woodbridge School Librarian, who attended Queen Mary CPD training, and Woodbridge Head of English at KS3/4, co-created materials with Adger for use with over 300 Year 8 students. The school considers this ‘an exciting and innovative way of maintaining phonological and grammatical knowledge learned at KS1/KS2 and often lost at KS3 and 4’ [5.4]. The planned use of this material (May 2020) was unfortunately postponed to May 2021 because of COVID-19, although, like Farnborough, the impact on the teaching plans and curriculum is in place, with future expansion planned.

Further activities have been planned for the 2021-22 academic year (e.g. LEH School CPD; Haberdashers CPD and Workshop) and Adger and van Urk have co-authored an article on the approach, to create further pathways to impact [5.7].

5. Sources to corroborate the impact

[5.1] [Testimonial] CLPE, Learning Programmes Leader. On the success of the Constructed Languages approach and how that has led them to integrate it into their programmes on a long-term basis. Copy of CLPE Course Planning Document. Formal Evaluations of CPD from CLPE. [Corroborator 1]

[5.2] [Testimonial] Links to viewing figures for Beowulf and email from producer about how Adger’s invention of the two languages for the show impacted on the production; evidence for sales of Language Unlimited; links to interviews, articles and podcasts by Adger on Constructed Languages in education.

[5.3] [Testimonial] Index of participating Schools with activities, dates of events, and specification of evidence.

[5.4] [Testimonial] Uxbridge Academy, including student improvement statistics; Farnborough College; Woodbridge School; Westminster Platform Director; and Christs College corroborating quotes/effectiveness of engagement/lists of participating schools. Invitation/Thanks emails, including lists of participating schools in events from Bedales, Eltham, Haileybury, Hampton, LEH, Queens, Sutton, Bilborough, Drayton Manor School) [Corroborators 2-5]

[5.5] [Feedback] Sample of student and teacher created materials (photographs of events; PDFs of created materials, Evaluation Forms for events confirming attendance).

[5.6] [Press] Copies of E-Magazine invited articles and materials

[5.7] [Book] Adger, D. & van Urk, C. (2020). Three conlang projects at three educational levels. Language Invention in Linguistics Pedagogy, 49-68. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198829874.003.0005

Submitting institution
Queen Mary University of London
Unit of assessment
26 - Modern Languages and Linguistics : A - Linguistics
Summary impact type
Societal
Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
No

1. Summary of the impact

Accurate teaching of contemporary spoken English in schools improves societal understanding of dialects and challenges language-based discrimination. A-Level teachers report an urgent need for expert guidance and up-to-date content for teaching contemporary English Language. Since 2013, world-leading Queen Mary University of London research on British and World Englishes has been converted into classroom content for all GCE A-Level, GCSE, and EAL/TESOL teachers. This has been delivered via the web-based Teach Real English! teaching materials. AQA Board examiners and teachers around the UK have incorporated the new content into the national AQA/GCE English Language curriculum, teacher training, and in-class practice across the UK and internationally.

2. Underpinning research

Queen Mary sociolinguists, Professors Sharma, Cheshire, and Levon, have played a leading role in the study of ongoing change in spoken English. This work has fundamentally expanded our knowledge of London English, World Englishes, and attitudes to spoken English. It has enabled teachers to satisfy core themes required by the AQA and other subject boards on cultural diversity, structural variation, and historical change in their teaching of contemporary spoken English.

London English: Cheshire, Sharma, and Levon have led the study of contemporary English across all social classes in London. Cheshire’s ESRC-funded team conducted the first ever large-scale sociolinguistic study of London. They documented the birth of a new dialect, Multicultural London English (MLE), showing that it arose in young multi-ethnic peer groups in working-class East London, displacing Cockney and spreading to traditional white working-class groups [3.1]. MLE stands as one of the foremost recent discoveries in dialectology and the phrase has entered public discourse. Sharma’s ESRC-funded team showed that a lower-middle-class, more mono-ethnic community just west of the birthplace of MLE developed an entirely different accent, British Asian English. To understand why, she pioneered new methods for studying accent repertoire, social network, speech style, and inter-generational language change [3.2]. Levon’s research on middle/upper-class speech showed that the whole system of vowels is lowering yet maintaining class distinctions, and updated public beliefs by challenging the stereotype that young middle-class women use more ‘uptalk’ (rising intonation) than men [3.3]. His work has pioneered an intersectional approach in sociolinguistics [3.4].

World Englishes: Sharma’s 20-year body of research on new English dialects worldwide compares Indian, Singaporean, African-American, Creole, and second-language English varieties [3.5]. As with her London research, this work has comprehensively documented the structure of World Englishes but also, crucially, why they come about—the basis of considerable public misinformation and prejudice.

Attitudes to English: To investigate the social impact of negative attitudes to new and old accents, Levon and Sharma’s ESRC-funded team conducted the first ever nationwide study of British attitudes to class, regional, and ethnic voices and their impact on professional recruiting [3.6]. Using novel experimental methods, they found that a long-standing hierarchy of accent prestige affects judgements of professional competence. The project is developing anti-bias training with HR teams and law firms (www.accentbiasbritain.org\).

Peer esteem for this research is reflected in Cheshire, Sharma, and Levon holding recent editorships at Language in Society and Journal of Sociolinguistics, the top two sociolinguistics journals. The research has attracted major national and international coverage, e.g. Sharma: The Telegraph, BBC Radio 4, BBC World Service, Levon: The Independent, Financial Times, Cheshire: Economist, CNN. The team are exceptionally well placed to lead this comprehensive update of spoken English Language in the national curriculum. Sharma led the creation of this suite of classroom materials. In addition to core content based on the research of three core scholars, Sharma integrated impact into the Queen Mary department’s research by encouraging other members of staff to add research-based content relating to attitudes in the media, fake news, attitudes to changing grammar, and digital media.

3. References to the research

[3.1] Cheshire, J., Kerswill, P., Fox, S., & Torgersen, E. (2011). Contact, the feature pool and the speech community: The emergence of Multicultural London English. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 15(2), 151-196. doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2011.00478.x

[3.2] Sharma, D. (2011). Style repertoire and social change in British Asian English. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 15(4), 464-492. doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2011.00503.x

[3.3] Levon, E. (2016). Gender, interaction and intonational variation: The discourse functions of High Rising Terminals in London. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 20(2), 133-163. doi.org/10.1111/josl.12182

[3.4] Levon, E. (2015). Integrating intersectionality in language, gender, and sexuality research. Language and Linguistics Compass, 9(7), 295-308. doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12147

[3.5] Sharma, D. (2009). Typological diversity in new Englishes. English World-Wide, 30(2), 170-195. doi.org/10.1075/eww.30.2.04sha

[3.6] Sharma, D., Levon, E., Watt, D., Ye, Y., & Cardoso, A. (2019). Methods for the study of accent bias and access to elite professions. Journal of Language and Discrimination, 3(2), 150-172. dx.doi.org/10.1558/jld.39979

Evidence of quality from peer-reviewed funding:

[EQR.3.1] Cheshire [PI] (2011). From sociolinguistic research to English language teaching [RES-189-25-0181]. ESRC. GBP120,237.

[EQR.3.1] Cheshire [PI] (2007-2010). Multicultural London English: the emergence, acquisition and diffusion of a new variety [RES-062-23-0814]. ESRC. GBP721,495.

[EQR.3.1] Cheshire [Co-I]. (2014-2020). Advancing the European Multilingual Experience [613465]. European Commission. Framework 7 AThEME project. EUR5,000,000.

[EQR.3.2] Sharma [PI]. (2008-2010). Dialect Development and Style in a Diasporic Community [RES-062-23-0604]. ESRC. GBP342,340.

[EQR.3.6] Levon [PI]. (2017-2020). Accent Bias and Fair Access in Britain [ES/P007767/1]. ESRC. GBP471,042.

4. Details of the impact

Research on British and World Englishes has resulted in three key areas of impact: curriculum content reform, teacher training, and student understanding.

Sharma and Cheshire first consulted 45 teachers (10/2017, KS3/GCSE/A-Level/ESOL). Cheshire had previously created materials on one theme (Multicultural London English, REF2014 ICS); teachers requested expanded content in this accessible format. They cited an urgent need to build technical expertise, meet exam board requirements to be research-led, and equip students with updated knowledge and skills. To maximise relevance to subject specifications, Sharma consulted a UK-wide advisory panel (18 teachers, senior examiners, lead moderator of AQA English Language) and identified six core curriculum domains.

Sharma then created Teach Real English! ( www.teachrealenglish.org) as an interactive resource for teachers to update their A-level English Language content, all based on Queen Mary’s sociolinguistics research: (i) 30 Teaching Units with audio recordings, transcripts, state-of-the-art analysis based on underpinning research, and classroom guidance: (ii) Linguistics Research Digest: 217 easy-to-read summaries of relevant recent academic articles; (iii) 17 guided Language Investigation projects for students; and (iv) technical Glossary. A-Level English Language teachers and students are primary beneficiaries. GCSE/EFL/EAL teachers and the general public are secondary beneficiaries.

Shaping GCE A-Level English Language curricula and teacher training

The national AQA English Language lead moderator and trainers have used this research to update national curricula and AQA-led teacher training courses [5.4]. They describe the research as ‘instrumental in helping to update the A-Level English Language curriculum’ [5.4], ‘crucial in moving the A-Level English Language curriculum forward’ and supporting ‘fundamental changes in the types of social concepts, theories, and language use teachers and students focus on in class’ [5.4].

The research team provided training via 18 teacher workshops and talks [5.1, UK-wide attendance by >100 schools], 5 articles in professional publications [5.2], and sustained social media contact with hundreds of GCE/GCSE teachers [5.7]. This has led to very high, sustained website traffic: 779,442 visitors (1/8/2013-30/8/2020), avg. 10,689/month [5.3]. The most frequently accessed Teaching Units cover Queen Mary research on ethnic minority speech, social class, and regularity of language change, equipping teachers and students with technical understanding and combating misrepresentations of dialect superiority.

Feedback provided by 52 teachers [5.5] confirms changes in both understanding (‘more up-to-date concepts and ideas (AO2 in exam board parlance)’) and practice (‘specific examples to analyse in the form of transcripts (AO1 skills)’). Examiners and teachers actively promote the content via AQA textbooks [5.6], professional magazines [5.2], and Social Media [5.7], e.g. ‘what a great resource […] to add to my teaching library’ and ‘looking forward to teaching this [resource]’.

Influencing GCE A-level English Language student understanding

Official AQA reports embed this research in curriculum and report student uptake [5.8]. The lead moderator of AQA English Language states:

‘[e]xaminers have reported seeing the influence of these interventions in the work produced by students in recent exam responses… the national AQA report for 7702/2 specifically mentions Teach Real English! content that has appeared in students’ answers (‘More successful students… discussed the repertoire analysis by Devyani Sharma’) It is rare to see resources like this have such a rapid impact on student work’ [5.4].

Surveyed students report uptake, e.g. ‘extremely useful, as it gave me a range of data and information for me to use in exam questions’ [5.5]. Teachers report benefits for students in understanding (‘it increases their chances of getting good grades as they are exploring new and different ideas… begins to prepare them for university’) and awareness (‘vital for getting them to see that people's everyday speech was a valid subject for analysis and not ‘wrong’ or ‘ungrammatical.’ [5.5]). Students acquire content via in-class teaching, textbooks [5.6], school websites [5.9], and talks at student/school events [5.1]. Teachers routinely direct students to the materials (‘Year 13 mock revision – accent and dialect and language and occupation combined. SO useful!!’ [5.7]) and engage students in media coverage of the research [5.7 p.4,9].

Impacting on EFL/ESL/EAL teaching content and delivery

The National Association for English as an Auxiliary Language (NALDIC formerly known as) requested an article on the resources for their EAL journal [5.2], in order to address ‘addresses areas that have typically been underrepresented, certainly in NALDIC’s output’ [5.4]. EAL teachers attending workshops echoed this need, reflecting on their use of the materials:

‘particularly for my C1/C2 students the actual focus on different accents and differing styles (hedging and discourse markers) helps them achieve native or near-native ability’ [5.5].

The website sees high traffic [5.3] from international EAL/ELT organisations/teachers, e.g. ‘fantastic Spoken London English resources with recordings, transcripts, and discussion points. Great for teaching pron! by researchers’ (Poland) [5.7].

5. Sources to corroborate the impact

[5.1] [Events] Teacher training workshops and teacher-focused public talks [Corroborator 1]

[5.2] [Articles] invited by professional teachers’ journals and magazines [Corroborator 2]

[5.3] [Data] Google Analytics and site traffic data

[5.4] [Testimonials] evidencing uses in AQA A-Level English training and curriculum [Corroborator 3]

[5.5] [Feedback] A-Level teacher and student feedback forms and testimonials [Corroborator 4]

[5.6] [Textbooks] Examples of textbooks published since 2014 that recommend Teach Real English! resources

[5.7] [Media] Examples of social media commentary

[5.8] [Reports] Official AQA documentation (e.g. annual examination reports and schemes of work) that mentions underpinning research and resources

[5.9] [Websites] Selection of school websites that recommend Teach Real English! resources

Showing impact case studies 1 to 2 of 2

Filter by higher education institution

UK regions
Select one or more of the following higher education institutions and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No higher education institutions found.
Institutions

Filter by unit of assessment

Main panels
Select one or more of the following units of assessment and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No unit of assessments found.
Units of assessment

Filter by continued case study

Select one or more of the following states and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.

Filter by summary impact type

Select one or more of the following summary impact types and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.

Filter by impact UK location

UK Countries
Select one or more of the following UK locations and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No UK locations found.
Impact UK locations

Filter by impact global location

Continents
Select one or more of the following global locations and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No global locations found.
Impact global locations

Filter by underpinning research subject

Subject areas
Select one or more of the following underpinning research subjects and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No subjects found.
Underpinning research subjects