Skip to main

Impact case study database

The impact case study database allows you to browse and search for impact case studies submitted to the REF 2021. Use the search and filters below to find the impact case studies you are looking for.

Search and filter

Filter by

  • Liverpool John Moores University
   None selected
  • 12 - Engineering
   None selected
   None selected
   None selected
   None selected
   None selected
   None selected
Waiting for server
Download currently selected sections for currently selected case studies (spreadsheet) (generating)
Download currently selected case study PDFs (zip) (generating)
Download tags for the currently selected case studies (spreadsheet) (generating)
Currently displaying text from case study section
Showing impact case studies 1 to 4 of 4
Submitting institution
Liverpool John Moores University
Unit of assessment
12 - Engineering
Summary impact type
Technological
Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
No

1. Summary of the impact

The research has had a direct quantifiable impact on both regulatory and public policy governing risk-based maritime systems operations, and the practices and activities of industrial organisations and services. A systematic decision-support methodology, together with a series of associated sector-specific models, has influenced industrial practice by shaping a goal-setting regime for maritime systems operations. The range of organisations influenced by the research has included regulatory and classification bodies (UK Health and Safety Executive (HSE) and Lloyd’s Register (LR)), maritime operators (Shell, Ministry of Defence (MoD), Three Gorges Navigation Authority, Siemens and Shanghai Pilot Station) and consulting companies (Risktec), in the UK and internationally.

2. Underpinning research

Over the past two decades, the maritime industry has been moving towards a pro-active, risk-based, goal-setting regime, from a largely prescriptive one. This has necessitated the development of RAIDS - A Risk Assessment Informed Decision Support Tool to address issues relating to the incompleteness, fuzziness and ambiguity of data associated with the unique design and operational characteristics of large-scale maritime engineering systems such as ocean-going ships, port terminals and offshore installations. In response, a series of innovative concepts, methods and models using data under uncertainty has been developed at the Liverpool Logistics, Offshore and Marine (LOOM) Research Institute since 2000, which has resulted in significant modelling advances in maritime technology. The focus has been on the extension of risk-based decision-making and the development of holistic and generic models and methods for knowledge-driven risk assessment and decision analysis. A number of external grant-funding sources including the EPSRC, EU and the HSE has supported the research in this area [RPs 1-12].

The development of the analysis models in this case study involved the investigation of a range of techniques, including Evidential Reasoning [ROs 1, 4], a risk matrix approach [ROs 2, 5], Bayesian Networks [RO 3], and multi-criteria decision-making [RO 6]. Many of these models have been developed and published in collaboration with industrial partners, with the detail reported in conference/journal publications, industrial guidelines/reports and completed PhD theses. All of the research projects included in this case study have involved collaboration with industrial partners, with industrial impact verified by LJMU researchers who have remained on site to test and validate the research outcomes.

Industrial impact at the operational, managerial and strategic levels have been associated with:

  1. The revision of maritime safety regulations associated with maritime systems design and operation, maritime accident investigations and human and organisational factors [ROs 4, 5].

  2. Safety/security planning for large marine engineering systems, ship selection and safety management [ROs 2, 3].

  3. The operation of ships, port terminals and offshore installations, specifically related to maintenance planning, evacuation planning, operational strategy planning and the selection of risk control measures [ROs 1, RO 6].

RAIDS as a tool with a number of supporting models enables safety to be considered as a quantitative design/operational objective, contributing to a fundamental shift in the maritime and offshore industries. The research, funded by HSE, EU and EPSRC in collaboration with Shell, LR and ABS, has enabled determination of risk of offshore installation/ship collisions and implementation of risk control measures in offshore installation design and operation [RPs 1, 2, 6, 9, 10, 12], providing guidelines for offshore stakeholders both in the UK and internationally. This research has led to risk estimation and decision models that can be used under high uncertainties in data. The research, funded by EPSRC and EU in collaboration with Peel, MoD and MCA, has developed risk-informed verification, certification and design selection models [RPs 3, 4, 5], facilitating the implementation of risk-based verification and updating the codes of practice for ships and offshore installations in order to ensure that safer designs and operational strategies can be generated cost-effectively. The research funded by EU and government bodies in collaboration with industrial partners has led to the improvement of their businesses and efficiency [RPs 7, 8, 11].

3. References to the research

Cited research outputs (all papers have been through a rigorous peer-review process):

RO 1: Asuquo M.P., Wang J., Zhang L., Phylip-Jones G. (2019), “Condition monitoring of marine and offshore machinery using evidential reasoning techniques”, Journal of Marine Engineering & Technology, 2019 ( doi.org/10.1080/20464177.2019.1573457).

RO 2: Fang Q.G., Yang Z.L., Hu S.P., Wang J. (2005), “Formal safety assessment and application of the navigation simulators for preventing human error in ship operations”, Journal of Marine Science and Application, Vol.4, No.3, 5-12 ( doi.org/10.1007/s11804-005-0014-3).

RO 3: Loughney S., Wang J., (2017), “Bayesian network modelling of an offshore electrical generation system for applications within an asset integrity case for normally unattended offshore installations”, Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part M - Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment, ( doi.org/10.1177/1475090217704787).

RO 4: Ma, F., Chen, Y. W., Huang, Z. C., Yan, X. P., Wang, J., (2016) “A novel approach of collision assessment for coastal radar surveillance”, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Vol.155, 179-195 ( doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2016.07.013).

RO 5: Wang J., Matellini D.B., Wall A., Phipps J. (2012), “Risk-based verification of large offshore systems”, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineering Part M – Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment, Vol.226(M3), 273-298 ( doi.org/10.1177/1475090211430302).

RO 6: Yang Z., Wang J., Bonsall S., “Approximate TOPSIS for vessel selection under uncertain environment”, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol.38, Issue 12, 2011, 14523-14534 ( doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.05.032).

Research projects/grants of particular relevance to this case study are as follows:

RP 1: Wang J., Yang J., Jenkinson I., “Application of approximate reasoning methodologies to the offshore design process”, EPSRC (GR/R32413/01 & GR/R30624/01), £173,844; 2001-2004.

RP 2: Wang J., Jenkinson I.D., “A novel and advanced decision support tool for offshore operations”, EPSRC (GR/S85504/01 & GR/S85498/01), £226,602; 2004-2007.

RP 3: Wang J., “Enabling Security and Risk-based Operation of Container Line Supply Chains (CLSCs) under High Uncertainties”, EPSRC (EP/F024436/1 & EP/F024606/1), £562,912; 2008-2011.

RP 4: Wang J., “A safety-based fire and rescue management system”, EPSRC (GR/F041993), £135,751; 2009-2012.

RP 5: Wang J., “Weastflows - West and east logistic flows (Weastflows) in the North West of Europe”, EU-Interreg NWE, €700,000 allocated to LJMU (out of €9m); 2011-2015.

RP 6: Wang J., “REFERENCE - Research Network on Flexible Risk Assessment and Decision Science”, EU-FP7 (Ref no. 314836), €384,000; 2012-2016.

RP 7: Hu S.P. Fang Q.G., Wang J., “Formal safety assessment of vessel accidents in confined waters”, Shanghai Municipal Education Committee & Shanghai Leading Academic Discipline, ¥3m (£300,000); 2013-2018.

RP 8: Yang Z.L., “ENRICH: EC-China Research Network for Integrated Supply Chains”, EU-FP7 (Ref no. 612546), €590k; 2013-2017.

RP 9: Wang J., “RESET - REliability and Safety Engineering and Technology for large maritime engineering systems”, EU-Horizon 2020 (Ref no. 730888), €1,427,500; 2017-2021.

RP 10: Wang J., “ARCWIND - Adaptation and implementation of floating wind energy conversion technology for the Atlantic region”, EU-Interreg Atlantic Area (Ref no. EAPA_344/2016), €400,437 allocated to LJMU (out of €3.9m); 2017-2021.

RP 11: Wall A., Wang J., Jenkinson I., “KTP with Risktec Solutions Ltd. To develop risk and safety assessment materials”, DTI, £123,000; 2008-2010.

RP 12: Wang J., Loughney S., “A decision support system” and “Collision Risk Management for Offshore Installations and Ship/Platform Collision”, UK HSE (Ref no. D3474 & PRJ1205), £120,000; 2001-2007 & 2017-2018.

4. Details of the impact

RAIDS and its associated supporting models has influenced industrial practice and facilitated the shaping of a goal-setting regime, now increasingly used in maritime systems design and operation. Examples of industry adoption of the risk-based decision support tool follow:

  1. The HSE has used the tool to improve offshore safety through a reduction in the number of collisions between offshore installations and vessels [ROs 3, 4; RPs 1, 2, 12]. The support tool currently benefits more than 184 offshore oil and gas installations on the United Kingdom Continental Shelf (UKCS). The research has directly led to the development of HSE guidance on avoiding offshore installation-ship collisions and improving the current capabilities of equipment able to warn of a potential collision - using Marine Radar (on Standby vessels or installations), Automatic Radar Plotting Aids, Radar Early Warning systems, Automatic Identification System (AIS) radio navigation and Vessel Traffic Monitoring Systems (VTS). The three relevant HSE guidelines produced by LJMU in collaboration with HSE are: 1) Effective collision risk management for offshore installations, HSE Book, 2019, 200 pages; 2) Ship/Platform collision incident database (2015), HSE Books, 2019; 3) Collision detection on the UKCS, HSE Books, 2019. 184 offshore oil and gas platforms on the UKCS and 1,327 worldwide have benefited from these guidelines since 2019 [Source 1]. Benefits to the offshore oil and gas platforms have included cost savings from the reduced risk of the demolition/removal of damaged installations after a collision, environmental clean-up and potential commercial costs associated with loss of contracts and business reputation. 14 ship operators including Swire Group, Tidewater, Fletcher Shipping and Subsea7 have benefited from the guidelines. Anchor-handling tug supply vessels, platform supply vessels, multipurpose supply vessels, emergency response/standby and rescue vessels, crew vessels and chase vessels run by these operators have used the guidelines to “ reduce the risk of a collision. In total, 500 offshore support vessels operated by these companies have used the guidelines in their enterprises” [Source 1]. The guidelines have provided the HSE with an indication of the effectiveness of the regulatory regime. They have been used to inform new HSE developments such as the ‘Walk to Work (W2W)’ and multi-agency incident response guidance. The guidelines have “ provided offshore stakeholders with an enhanced awareness of both incident occurrence and the regulatory oversight; and have assisted in the reduction of potential collisions and hence helped maintain the risk control options necessary to prevent the loss of life” [Source 1]. 10 other countries, including Ireland, have also benefited from this research, since they monitor ongoing activities on the UKCS and often duplicate the UK regulatory regime for their own use. Many large offshore operators such as BP and Shell are international operators with their own corporate standards which are then applied locally. They have used the research findings to benchmark themselves against the collision data and looked at ways of detecting potential collision risk as part of mitigation measures [Source 1].

  2. The risk-based decision support tool has led to the development of a Risk-Based Verification (RBV) framework for offshore installations [RO 5; RPs 2, 4]. The RBV framework has “ helped duty holders effectively implement the verification process and guided Independent Competent Persons (ICPs) to evaluate the risk associated with safety critical elements” [Source 5.2]. Lloyd’s Register has adopted the tool to facilitate the RBV certification process for offshore oil and gas rigs, which is a mandatory process within the UKCS. Since the introduction of the EU Offshore Safety Directive in 2014, other countries including Cyprus, Ireland, Brunei and Nigeria have adopted this regime. 40 duty holders (owners) including BP, and 250 fixed offshore oil and gas installations have benefited from the work as it has identified the gaps in the verification process, as well as proposed solutions, such as a toolkit for duty holders/independent verification bodies and the introduction of a proactive verification process. Direct beneficiaries have been the offshore workforce, benefiting from a root cause analysis of the degraded Safety Environmental Critical Elements (SECEs). The RBV framework has been used to identify, and systematically analyse major accident hazards/SECEs, directly leading to a reduction in the cost of verification (10% estimated by Lloyds Register) [Source 2].

  3. The risk-based decision support tool [RO 1; RPs 3, 6] has been used in Shell Global Lubricants’ planned maintenance system using lubricating oil condition monitoring techniques, benefiting 1,000 ships with tonnage ranging between 5,000 and 250,000 tons. Ship operators’ lubricating oil has been monitored in order to take appropriate action before the ship’s machinery system breaks down. Industry analysis has indicated that the Return on Investment for lubricating oil analysis, incorporating the safety-based support system, is approximately 14 times. The efficient marine planned maintenance system has been used for robust improvement and management, especially in situations where conventional planned maintenance techniques cannot be implemented with confidence due to data deficiency. The business benefit has been very significant in terms of: 1) the direct revenue from the LubeAnalyst service (over $10m each year since 2016); and 2) the additional lubricants business as a result of being able to offer innovative services (over $100m each year since 2016). It has also led to the development of new strategic partnerships in marine lubricants between Shell and a number of its clients [Source 3].

  4. The research has been instrumental in the development of a new engineering safety training approach for high-risk industries, which includes the marine and offshore sectors (mainly in the Middle East region), initially through a two-year KTP project with Risktec Solutions Ltd [RO 6; RP 11]. Risktec Solutions Ltd is a global specialist in risk management consulting, software and risk management training, helping clients manage health, safety, security, environmental and business risk. This KTP project was assessed as “Outstanding” by the KTP Grading Panel in 2010, and selected as the best Knowledge Transfer Partnership in the North West in the KTP Regional Partnership Awards 2011. A novel training approach based on the risk-based decision support tool was used to develop a series of risk assessment courses [RPs 5, 9]. “ The Risktec training business has generated revenues of over £7.5 million since 2014. An approximate revenue per year is £1.2m. Based on 2019 revenue, the FTE for this new business is approximately an additional 5 FTEs.” Risktec has seen “positive internal staff development for junior staff. There is a general perception (but not one that is easily measurable) that offering training in addition to the core services has improved Risktec’s exposure to new customers and clients through an increased profile. This new training approach has enabled Risktec Solutions Ltd to operate their businesses with a much stronger capacity” [Source 4]. Risktec has part-funded an industrial lectureship (50%) in Risk Assessment at LOOM since 2014. An industrial MSc. course in risk assessment, managed by Risktec in cooperation with Liverpool John Moores University, has attracted an average cohort of 10 learners each year since 2014. The risk-based decision support tool has been used in more than 10 consulting projects worth £5m to Risktec since 2014 [Source 4].

  5. The risk-based decision support tool has been used in the design of Alterations and Additions (A&As) for vessels of the Royal Fleet Auxiliary (RFA) since 2016 [RO 6; RP 6], specifically in upgrading and updating capability decision-making. The decision-making tool has been employed in 9 ships of the RFA flotilla and 4 ships (Tide Class tankers) in various stages of completion, trials and commissioning since 2016. The risk-based decision support tool has been incorporated in a novel way, through the application of formal decision-making techniques allied to A&A reasoning as an integral part of the ‘in-service’ Design Control Board (DCB) process for RFA ships. The DCB process is fundamental to the risk-based decisions made by the RFA for A&As, and has led to cost savings in A&As implementation as a result of a 14-26% saving in man hours. The fundamental principles (of A&A implementation) are applicable to surface ships undergoing design change throughout their service life within the Royal Navy [Source 5].

  6. Operational policy and regulations for more than 200 large inland vessels have been shaped/modified through the use of the risk-based decision support tool [ROs 1, 4; RP 8] by the Three Gorges Navigation Authority and Changjiang Safety Agency, China since 2015. This has increased the annual ship capacity of the Three Gorges ship lock by between 5 and 8% since 2015. Over 45,000 vessels carrying more than 100m tons of cargo pass through the Three Gorges each year [Source 6]. Navigation pressure on the Three Gorges ship lock has eased significantly. The enhanced security warning capabilities incorporating the risk-based support tool have utilized fully the supervision and assistance of modern equipment such as VTS, GPS, and CCTV, rationalizing the working procedures and responsibilities of the navigable command, locks, anchorages, etc. The effective identification and real-time monitoring of the ship’s navigation are strengthened and implemented. As a result, the time taken for ships to pass through the gate has been shortened and the daily operating efficiency of the ship lock has been improved [Source 6].

  7. The research into developing a risk assessment-based approach into the assessment of vessel traffic risks at pilotage and in congested waters [RO 2; RP 7], has been used by the Shanghai Pilot Station (SPS) at the Port of Shanghai to improve SPS pilotage safety since 2014. The technical model, with uncertainties in data and validation, of the proposed risk reduction measures has been developed within the risk-based decision support tool, in collaboration with those at SPS [Source 7]. The research has resulted in an annual reduction of pilotage-related vessel traffic incidents/accidents by 8-12% since 2014. The estimated savings from reducing pilotage-related vessel traffic incidents/accidents are £5m per year since 2014. SPS oversees about 5,000 large ships piloted through the Port of Shanghai each year [Source 7].

  8. A detailed study of the relationship between pure risk and compliance and its impact on the risk assessment process has been conducted with Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy Limited since 2017 [RP 10]. “ Ascertaining what effect work-based substance misuse has on the safety and financial performance of business allows for better assessment methodologies and allows an understanding of the true cost and scale of substance abuse in a UK workforce. The control of substance misuse in the workplace has an effect on the company’s incident and accident rates”. The risk-based decision support tool has been used to produce an industrial guideline on drug and alcohol abuse through investigating if the control of substance misuse in the workplace has any effect on the company’s incident and accident rates. The guideline has been in use by Siemens, “ *already benefited a number of offshore wind farms and has been shared with the offshore wind energy industry body (The G+ Organisation)*”. The drug-related accident rate has fallen by 40% and the incident rate by 58% in 2019 when compared to the 2017 figures. Annual hours saved have increased by 56% when compared with the 2017 data [Source 8].

Evidence of the long-term industrial impact is demonstrated by three prestigious awards to LOOM members from three professional institutions. These include 1) the award for ‘Outstanding Contribution to Marine Safety’ from the Institute of Marine Engineering, Science and Technology (IMarEST) in 2018; 2) the Royal Institution of Naval Architects (RINA) – Lloyd’s Register Maritime Safety award for improving the safety of life at sea and the protection of the maritime environment through novel and improved design, construction and operational procedures in 2018; and 3) “Award for Risk Reduction in Mechanical Engineering” for outstanding contribution in risk reduction of maritime/mechanical systems as the annual winner from the Institution of Mechanical Engineers (IMechE) in 2018. All three awards are given to a member of the global marine community in recognition of a significant contribution to improving maritime safety in the sector annually.

5. Sources to corroborate the impact

Source 1: HM Principal Inspector, HSE, UK

Source 2: Surveyor in Charge, Lloyd’s Register EMEA, UK

Source 3: LubeAnalyst Leader, Shell Global Lubricants, UK

Source 4: Technical Manager, Risktec Solutions Ltd, UK

Source 5: Manager, Platform Mechanical Systems, MoD, UK

Source 6: Director of Three Gorges Navigation Authority and Changjiang Safety Agency, China

Source 7: Managing Director, Shanghai Pilot Station, China

Source 8: UK & IE Risk Manager, Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy Limited, UK

Submitting institution
Liverpool John Moores University
Unit of assessment
12 - Engineering
Summary impact type
Technological
Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
No

1. Summary of the impact

The research of the Microelectronics Group (MG) has impacted the industry in four ways: (W1) The predicative model developed by the MG has been used for both process qualification and ‘product design kit’ software; (W2) The developed test techniques have been embedded into commercial instruments as a standard module; (W3) Direct participation in the world-leading industrial consortium that is developing state-of-the-art future technologies; (W4) The in-depth knowledge gained on device instability has been innovatively utilised to design and build a new hardware True Random Number Generator (TRNG) for IoT security applications.

2. Underpinning research

Electronic products can fail. Metal-oxide-semiconductor field effect transistors (MOSFETs) are used in over 90% of integrated circuit chips in electronic products. The oxide and its interface with the semiconductor is at the heart of MOSFETs, and are vulnerable to stresses. Their wear-out rate determines device lifetime. Moreover, wear-out is a stochastic process and contributes to device-to-device variations, which is a major challenge for designing modern chips.

Recognizing the importance of a stable oxide/semiconductor structure to the industry, the Microelectronics Group (MG) has focused their research on this aspect, mainly through six EPSRC funded projects [G1-G6] between 2000 and 2020. The research has been carried out in collaboration with a range of industrial partners, from international leaders such as ARM Ltd and Synopsys, to start-ups such as Semiwise.

The milestones and achievements that underpin this impact case are summarised in chronological order below:

  1. A framework has been established for defects, that clearly identifies what kinds of traps exist in the device [G1*, R1*, G2]. In addition to as-grown traps formed during device fabrication, MG’s works clearly show that stresses generate new traps.

  2. The key properties of each type of defect have been obtained by developing novel measurement techniques. For example, a new energy profile probing method is developed to identify the energy location of traps [G3, R2]. It is found that the generated traps have different energy levels from the as-grown traps and this difference allows an accurate separation of one from the other.

  3. Different kinetic models were developed for different type of defects. This breaks the mind-set of early works that all defects follow the same kinetics and leads to the proposal of the ‘As-grown-Generation model (AG)’. The industrial standard, JEDEC, uses power-law for ageing kinetics, but test data of modern devices do not follow it, which has puzzled the community. For the first time, MG’s works identified the source of this deviation, proposed a method to restore the power-law, and verified that the prediction of the AG model for device ageing under usage conditions [G4, R3].

  4. Fast test techniques have been developed for extracting model inputs [G4, R3] to facilitate the application of the proposed model in industrial test laboratories.

  5. The application and extension of the knowledge, model, and techniques to qualify new processes, materials, and devices, for example, Resistive Random Access Memory (RRAM) [G5, G6, G7, R4, R5].

The AG model was directly used in predictive modelling, the impact W1, described in the summary. The test techniques developed were embedded in standard instruments (W2). The in-depth knowledge gained and the expertise in testing has enabled the MG to contribute to the development of new technology (W3). This knowledge on defects also led to the design and build of a True Random Number Generator (TRNG) (W4) [G8, R6].

*G and R stand for Grants and Research outputs in Section 3.

3. References to the research

Projects/Grants (G) and Research outputs (R) cited in Sections 2 and 4 are listed below. A research output is placed directly under the grant that funded it.

[G1] Hole Trap Generation and It's Role In Oxide Breakdown, EPSRC, GR/R10387/01, 2001 2004 (£165,961), PI: J. F. Zhang.

[R1] J. F. Zhang, C. Z. Zhao, A. H. Chen, G. Groeseneken and R. Degraeve, “Hole traps in silicon dioxides --- Part I: Properties,” IEEE Trans. Electron Dev., Vol.51, No.8, pp.1267-1273, 2004 (doi.org/10.1109/TED.2004.831379).

[G2] Performance, degradation and defect structure of MOS devices using high-k materials as gate dielectrics, EPSRC, EP/C003071/1, 2005-2008 (£191,097), PI: J. F. Zhang.

[G3] High permittivity dielectrics on Ge for end of Roadmap application, EPSRC, EP/I012966/1, 2011-2014 (£462,589), PI: J. F. Zhang, CoI: W. Zhang.

[R2] S. F. W. M. Hatta, Z. Ji, J. F. Zhang, M. Duan, W. Zhang, N. Soin, B. Kaczer, S. De Gendt, and G. Groeseneken, “Energy distribution of positive charges in gate dielectric: probing technique and impacts of different defects,” IEEE Trans. Electron Dev., Vol. 60, No. 5, pp. 1745-1753, 2013 (doi.org/10.1109/TED.2013.2255129).

[G4] Time-Dependent Variability: A test-proven modelling approach for systems verification and power consumption minimization, EPSRC, 2014-2018 (£517,676), PI: J. F. Zhang, CoI: Z. Ji and W. Zhang.

[R3] R. Gao, Z. Ji, A. B. Manut, J. F. Zhang, J. Franco, S. W. M. Hatta, W. D. Zhang, B. Kaczer, D. Linten, and G. Groeseneken, “NBTI-Generated Defects in Nanoscaled Devices: Fast Characterization Methodology and Modeling,” IEEE Trans. Electron Dev., Vol. 64, No. 10, pp.4011-4017, 2017 (doi.org/10.1109/TED.2017.2742700).

[G5] Mechanisms and Control of Resistive Switching in Dielectrics, EPSRC, EP/M006727/1, 2015-2018 (£350,016), PI: W. Zhang, CoI: J. F. Zhang.

[G6] Variability-aware RRAM PDK for design based research on FPGA/neuro computing, EPSRC, 2018-2021 (£378,364), PI: W. Zhang; CoI: J. F. Zhang and Z. Ji.

[R4] F. Hatem, Z. Chai, W. Zhang, A. Fantini, R. Degraeve, S. Clima, D. Garbin, J.Robertson, Y. Guo, J. F. Zhang, J. Marsland, P. Freitas, L. Goux, G. S. Kar “Endurance improvement of more than five orders in GexSe1-x OTS selectors by using a novel refreshing program scheme,” Technical Digest of the International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), pp. 827-830, San Francisco, Dec. 7-11, 2019.

[R5] D. Joksas, P. Freitas, Z. Chai, W.H. Ng, M. Buckwell, C. Li, W.D. Zhang, Q. Xia, A.J. Kenyon, A. Mehonic, “Committee machines—a universal method to deal with non-idealities in memristor-based neural networks,” Nature Communications, Vol. 11, Article number: 4273, 2020 (doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18098-0).

[G7] Rolling research collaboration project with IMEC: Euro100k p.a. since 2005

[G8] A true random number generator (TRNG) MVP for RFID tags in healthcare, Innovate UK, 2018-2019 (£109,952), PI: Z. Ji.

[R6] J. Brown, R. Gao, Z. Ji, J. Chen, J. Wu, J. F. Zhang, B. Zhou, Q. Shi, J. Crowford, and W. Zhang, “A low-power and high-speed True Random Number Generator using generated RTN,” Proc of IEEE VLSI Tech. Symp., pp. 95-96, Honolulu, June 2018.

4. Details of the impact

The research of the Microelectronics Group (MG) is mainly funded by the EPSRC. EPSRC emphasizes the impact of research on industry and society. MG shares this value and has used industry relevance as a core criterion when selecting research topics. The projects were created by consulting industrial partners and all test samples used in the projects were supplied by partners. To increase the impact, MG chose to publish their results at industry-centric conferences, such as IEDM, where leading companies, such as Intel, announce their latest breakthroughs. The knowledge gained through this industry-centric research approach enables the MG to provide a service to the industry in terms of:

(W1) The predicative modelling

Early works from some research groups verified their device-ageing models by showing that the models can fit test data well. This, however, did not deliver the original mission of the modelling: to predict device and circuit performance where test data does not exist. MG determined to take up this challenge and qualified their model by its capability to predict device performance under real use conditions [R3]. This has attracted the attention of industry and the model has been used to:

(I) Qualify new processes and materials by using the model to predict device lifetime:

Ever since the invention of integrated circuits in 1958, the intensive competition has driven the industry to develop a new process every 1.5~2 years. Before one process can make its commercial debut, the industry standard requires a device lifetime of 10 years. This requires prediction, as it is impractical to test devices for that long. The MG’s predictive model has been used to qualify new processes [S1, S2 (Section 5)].

S1 is a partner of the EPSRC-funded projects and supplied some of the test samples used by the projects. The research results were disseminated directly to it through progress meetings. Two members of MG joined S1 to work on process qualification: Dr MB Zahid in 2008 and Dr B Tang in 2016.

S2 is an international chip foundry. After MG presented the AG model at the 2013 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), S2 invited members of MG to present the model to the company’s test engineers in 2014. After the presentation, the company decided to adopt the model. This involves changing test procedure and data analysis to improve the accuracy of device lifetime estimation. The company’s lawyers did not allow the company to provide a financial figure on the benefit of the model to the company.

In addition to S1 and S2, the model has received an increasingly wide attention and members of MG have been invited and funded to deliver tutorials to train test engineers on how to implement the model. Over 500 engineers have taken part in the training so far. The latest tutorial was delivered at the 26th IEEE International Symposium on the Physical and Failure Analysis (IPFA) of Integrated Circuits, Qingdao, July 2019, with over 100 attendees [S3].

(II) Product Design Kit (PDK)

The modern microelectronic industry has some companies, such as ARM, specializing in design and others, such as TSMC, focusing on fabrication. The bridge between them is PDK. The ‘First Silicon Success’ relies on the accuracy of models used in PDK and the discrepancy between models and silicon performance is a major challenge to the industry. The research and models of MG have been used to develop reliability- and variability-aware PDKs [S4, S5]. These PDKs allow designers to take the reliability and time-dependent device-to-device variation into account when verifying their circuits, which in turn not only increases the ‘First Silicon Success’, but also optimizes the performance of designed circuits in term of power, speed, and cost.

Semiwise [S4] is a start-up, while S5 is a prime international supplier of Electron Design Automation (EDA) software. S5 is a partner in the EPSRC projects [G4, G6] and at the end of project G4, the post-doctoral researcher, Dr M Duan, joined S5 in 2018 to work on variability-aware PDK. The collaboration with S4 and S5 is further strengthened through the award of the joint EPSRC project (“Realistic fault modelling to enable optimization of low power IoT and Cognitive fault-tolerant computing systems”, EP/T026022/1, £487k) in 2020.

(W2) Embedding test techniques into commercial instruments

Based on commercial instruments, MG developed a number of advanced characterisation techniques that require technique-specific programs and hardware setups. MG realised that these programs and setups were not available to other users of the same instruments, as MG were invited by a project partner to implement the technique for their laboratory [S1].

After this experience, MG contacted the instrument supplier and explored embedding these techniques into their instruments as a module. The company then invited MG to visit their research and development centre in Ohio, USA, followed by the company visiting Liverpool John Moores University. The module has been jointly developed and embedded into the supplier’s most advanced semiconductor parameter analyser, KEITHLEY 4200, and shipped to the customers. MG worked together with the supplier to prepare the module’s user manual. In addition, MG was invited and funded to train test engineers at the workshops organized by the supplier [S6]. This collaboration started in 2012 and is on-going, as more techniques have been added to the module when they are developed by MG.

Since 2017, over 4,000 engineers have taken part in the training. The Company could not tell MG how many customers bought the instrument because of this test module. What they can say is that, at September 2019, 3145 copies of the module were shipped together with the instrument to world-wide customers [S6]. To continue the collaboration and add more techniques to the module, the Company offered a PhD studentship to MG [S7].

(W3) Contributing to development of new technologies

As transistors are downscaled to nano-meters, the cost of developing future technologies becomes so expensive that even the sector’s largest companies, such as Intel, cannot afford to do everything on their own. To share the cost, the industry has formed a consortium, based at IMEC, Belgium, whose members include Intel (US), ARM (UK), Micron (US), Samsung (Korea), Toshiba (Japan) and TSMC (Taiwan). Each company has its own assignees based at IMEC. Every six months, there is a partner technical week (PTW) to review the progress of the R&D work.

The cost of fabricating the industry-relevant nano-meter transistors is well beyond the reach of MG. To contribute to this world-wide effort to develop future generation technologies that impact the daily life of society, MG’s strategy has been to collaborate with this industrial consortium and to focus on the qualification of new processes, materials and devices sourced from the consortium.

To strengthen the link with the consortium, MG has one researcher based at IMEC, who takes part in the daily R&D activities of the consortium. This offers a direct bridge between MG and the consortium. The issues to be addressed and the test samples needed by MG are co-identified with the researchers at IMEC. The results are disseminated directly to the consortium through MG’s researcher at IMEC. The MG’s works have impacted the Consortium’s development work in terms of material selection, structure evaluation, and performance optimization [S8]. For example, one joint paper published at 2019 IEDM conference is entitled “Endurance improvement of more than five orders in GexSe1-x OTS selectors by using a novel refreshing program scheme” [R4].

The value of this collaboration has been recognized by IMEC and IMEC has supported the research at LJMU through a rolling contract of Euro100k p.a. for over 20 years [G7]. To the best of MG’s knowledge, LJMU is the only UK university that IMEC has supported continuously in this way for over two decades. LJMU is also the only UK university that has been regularly invited to give presentations to the Consortium at its ‘partner technical week’ meetings. It is a privilege for MG to work together with THE world leading consortium at the forefront of developing new technology. This has allowed MG to punch well above its weight. The collaboration goes from strength to strength, initially in the area of logic devices and now also in memory devices.

(W4) Defect-based True Random Number Generator and its commercialization

The three key issues identified for IoT are security, cost, and power consumption. Random Numbers are required in cryptography and authentication and their generator is an essential component of security systems. The algorithm-based software generators used in some security systems are not truly random and are vulnerable to attack. The True Random Number Generator (TRNG) harvests the randomness of natural phenomena in hardware without using an algorithm.

MG has gained an in-depth knowledge of defects in transistors, whose charging-discharging produces random telegraph noise. Although noise is unwanted for normal electronic circuits, MG innovatively harvested its randomness to design and build a TRNG, which is 10 times faster than the TRNG proposed by early works [R6]. The events comprising this impact are outlined in chronological order below:

  • MG submitted a paper on its TRNG to the 2018 Symposium on VLSI technology. The conference organizer not only accepted the paper [R6], but also invited and funded MG to demonstrate the TRNG to the conference attendees, along with the demonstrations by Intel Corporation and Panasonic Corporation [S9].

  • MG applied for, and was awarded a grant by Innovate UK to develop a proto-type product for its TRNG [G8].

  • MG was invited to demonstrate its proto-type product at the 2018 International Security Expo in London. A number of companies expressed their interest in the product.

  • This led to the award of USA patent (Attorney-Docket-Number: P34923US1).

  • Crypta Labs and Secure Technologies Ltd are bidding for the IP for security application in their products [S10].

In summary, to maximize the significance of the impact of its research, MG has chosen to work together with world leaders by providing better models (W1), new test techniques (W2), material/structure optimization (W3), and new product design (W4). This collaboration also led to a wide reach of its impact. For example, by embedding the new technique into the instruments of a prime supplier, it reached the supplier’s world-wide customers. The sustainability of MG’s approach has been demonstrated by the continuous collaboration and by the partnership in the EPSRC projects with these leading organizations over the last two decades.

5. Sources to corroborate the impact

[S1] R&D manager - Device Reliability and Electrical Characterization group at IMEC, Belgium.

[S2] Reliability Engineering Manager, Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation.

[S3] Tutorial in The 26th IEEE International Symposium on the Physical and Failure Analysis

(IPFA) of Integrated Circuits, 2019.

[S4] Chairman, Semiwise, UK.

[S5] Design Manager, Synopsys.

[S6] Marketing Manager, Tektronix.

[S7] General Manager of Keithley Instruments, USA.

[S8] VP Memory & Storage, IMEC, Belgium.

[S9] Process Integration Manager, Texas Instruments, Texas, United States; Group Leader, Central Research Laboratory, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan.

[S10] Chief Executive Officer of Crypta Labs and Director of Secure Technologies Ltd.

Submitting institution
Liverpool John Moores University
Unit of assessment
12 - Engineering
Summary impact type
Technological
Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
No

1. Summary of the impact

The creation of a novel decision-support system, powered by new algorithms and models developed for the first time, is helping authorities and industry to make improved and more timely decisions, resulting in greener, more efficient and more sustainable transport and logistics:

  1. Reducing costs up to 23%, emissions up to 19%, and accidents estimated at 10% in the port/maritime industry (VICONSHIP, the Ports of Liverpool, and COSCO Shipping Logistics).

  2. Improving rail performance and passenger experience, monitoring four of Merseyrail’s busiest stations (~24 million passengers annually) and directly servicing ~100,000 passengers/month at Liverpool South Parkway mainline interchange (10/10 score from station staff and 8/10 score from passengers).

  3. Supporting active travel options (walking and cycling) in the Liverpool City Region (LCR) by providing data/analysis to both users and local authority operators, as part of the development/upgrade of 57.5km green cycling/walking routes, to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by an estimated 334 tonnes in the period 2019-20.

  4. Influencing UN policymaking on port adoption to climate change. Adoption of the safety assessment system by the Port of Dalian has led to a reduction of incidents by 8% and annual safety cost savings of £250k.

  5. Assisting the region’s COVID-19 response with a monitoring/evaluation system for 11 LCR popup emergency routes, supplying traffic data to the Department for Transport (DfT) (March-July 2020) and local authorities (March-December 2020), optimising people movement and social distancing measures in the LCR, and providing rail passengers with critical real-time travel information at Liverpool South Parkway station(56,000 passenger-journeys).

2. Underpinning research

Transport and logistics are essential drivers for economic growth and their sustainability is a challenge to UN, EU and UK government, targeting greener, more efficient and sustainable systems. These macro-level targets have informed the evolution of sustainable transportation and logistics research at LJMU, with a focus on maritime, rail, cycling, and walking applications.

A novel decision-support system has been developed in close collaboration with industry, comprising a set of tools applicable to different modes of transportation/logistics. Its impact has been validated by industrial partners. The body of the underpinning research (£5m in grant value to LJMU in total) that has directly led to the claimed impacts is described below:

  1. Research on port operations

Funded by the EU [RPs 1, 2] and the Newton Fund [RP 3], we worked with various European and Far East ports to improve efficiency, reduce costs, and decrease emissions and pollution. The requirement to optimise the use of cutting-edge technologies, such as automated vehicles and automated gates, led us to devise new mathematical/optimisation techniques, because existing methods did not work. These new models have been utilised by the port industry in all three aspects of port operations: the seaside (berth planning and vessel stowage optimisation; e.g., RP 3); the yard (yard simulation and container stacking optimisation; e.g., RP 1); and the landside (truck appointment, vehicle routing, and bin packing optimisation; e.g., RP 3). For example, the research output [RO 1] offered the first insights into how different advanced optimisation and simulation methods can be combined to improve the performance of ports.

  1. Research on railway operations

Funded by DfT, the Rail Safety and Standards Board (RSSB), and Innovate UK, we worked with the rail industry to improve: (a) passenger experience [RP 8]; (b) train operations e.g., more accurate delay prediction and estimation of ‘slippery rail’ [RPs 4, 7]; and (c) staff and infrastructure management/communication [RPs 4, 10]. For example, RO 6 proposed a novel algorithm that allocates passenger seats in real-time to increase seats utilisation and reduce congestion, taking into account arrival time, journey leg and length, passenger preferences, luggage and passenger groups.

  1. Research on active travel, especially cycling and walking

Funded by the EU, the DfT, and additional support from industry such as [RP 6], we worked with local authorities, cyclists and walkers, police forces, delivery companies, and regional cycling and walking commissioners to develop new algorithms and models to tackle problems never previously addressed. This included the development of: (a) the first risk predictors associated with cycling for the LCR; (b) the first system that combines deep learning computer vision and IoT to monitor cycling/walking activities, and novel machine learning techniques to detect potholes by learning from cyclist behaviour. For example, RO 2 proposed a novel algorithm to address vehicle routing issues.

  1. Research on strategic decision-making in the maritime industry

Funded by the EU and ERC, we worked with policymakers and port authorities to develop analysis models involving transport safety, logistics security, and supply chain adaptation to climate change [RPs 2, 5, 9]. For example, a new shipping resilience risk concept to reduce incident-related logistics costs has been developed [RO 3]. Port adaptation measures to climate change have been produced for port terminals that operate under uncertainties [ROs 4, 5].

3. References to the research

Cited research outputs (all papers have been through a rigorous peer-review process) :

RO 1 - Kavakeb S., Nguyen T.T., McGinley K., Yang Z., Jenkinson I., Murray R. (2015). Green vehicle technology to enhance the performance of a European port: a simulation model with a cost-benefit approach. Transportation Research, Part C, 60: 169-188 ( https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2015.08.012).

RO 2 - Zhang D., Cai S., Ye F., Si Y-W., Nguyen T.T. (2017). A hybrid algorithm for a vehicle routing problem with realistic constraints. Information Sciences, 394-395: 167-182 ( https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2017.02.028).

RO 3 - Wan C., Yang Z., Yan X.P., Zhang D. (2017). Resilience in transportation systems: A systematic review and future directions. Transport Reviews, 38: 479-498 ( https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2017.1383532).

RO 4 - Yang Z., Ng A., Lee P.T.W., Wang T., Qu Z., Rodrigues V.S., Pettit S., Harris I., Zhang D., Lau Y.T. (2018). Risk and cost evaluation of port adaptation measures to climate change impacts. Transportation Research Part D, 61: 444-458 ( https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.03.004).

RO 5 - Al-Yami H., Yang Z., Ramin R., Bonsall S., Wang J. 2019. Advanced uncertainty modelling for container port risk analysis. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 123: 411-421 ( https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2016.08.007).

RO 6 - Yazdani D., Omidvar M.N., Deplano I., Lersteau C., Makki A., Wang J., Nguyen T.T. (2019). Real-time seat allocation for minimizing boarding/alighting time and improving quality of service and safety for passengers. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 103: 158-173 ( https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2019.03.014).

Cited research projects

RP 1 - “InTraDE – Intelligent Transport for Dynamic Environment”, €516k to the Unit (out of €3.5m), 2009-14, EU Interreg, PI: Yang Z.

RP 2 - “ENRICH – EU China Research Network on Integrated Supply Chains”, €592k, EU FP7, 2013-17, PI: Yang Z.

RP 3 - “Sustainable maritime logistics research UK-Vietnam”, £300k, UK Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy, 2015-17, PI: Nguyen T.T.

RP 4 - “Data Sandbox - Anticipating and mitigating reactionary delays in railway networks”, £108k, Rail Safety & Standards Board, 2018-19, PI: Nguyen T.T.

RP 5 - “GOLF - EC-Asia research network on integration of global and local agri-food supply chains towards sustainable food security”, €189k (out of €1m), EU RISE, 2018-22, PI: Yang Z.

RP 6 - “Liverpool City Region green sustainable travel corridors”, EU ERDF, £678k (of £8.5m), 2018-21, PI: Nguyen T.T.

RP 7 – “ANTI-SLIP: Anticipate and mitigate the impact of slippery rail”, £123k, Rail Safety & Standards Board, 2019-20, PI: Nguyen T.T.

RP 8 - “COINS: Customer-Operational Information System for Stations”, £265k, DfT (via Innovate UK), 2019-20, PI: Nguyen T.T.

RP 9 - “TRUST - Towards Resilient and Sustainable Container Transport”, €1.99m, 2020-25, EU ERC (Consolidator Grant), PI: Yang Z.

RP 10 - “IRIS: Information System for Railway Station Staff”, £330k, DfT (via Innovate UK), 2020-21, PI: Nguyen T.T.

4. Details of the impact

The system developed at LJMU has influenced industrial practice and benefited both industry and transport users. Evidence of impact is demonstrated below:

  1. Adoption by the port industry to improve port operations ( e.g. [RPs 1, 3]). For example:

a. Vietnam’s leading logistics corporation VICONSHIP reported that the system is capable of eliminating container re-handles, which are the number of times containers have to be reshuffled unnecessarily in the yard (55% of all containers in the 600,000 TEUs/year case-study port). This is equivalent to a 23% reduction in the total cost of cargo handling and a 19% decrease in emissions from container handling vehicles [ Source 1]. In addition to cost saving, the reduction in emissions saves lives and improve quality of life. It is estimated that emissions from shipping alone cause 600 premature deaths annually in Vietnam, according to research from Nature Climate Change. [dates of impact: 2017]

b. The system reduced ship imbalance from 230 tonnes to 4.8 tonnes [ Source 1]. This work was conducted jointly with Vietnam National University Hanoi – LJMU contributed 50%. [dates of impact: 2017]

c. The system [RO 1] has helped the Port of Liverpool (Peel Ports) to better evaluate the performance of its lock system. The lock is the main entrance to the port’s second largest terminal, so understanding its performance is essential for maintaining a large throughput of 1.5m TEUs going through the lock [ Source 2]. [dates of impact: 2016]

  1. Adoption by the port industry for port safety ( e.g. [RPs 2, 5]). For example, the system has provided safety self-assessment methods [RO 5], as well as a new risk analysis and alert software package. These have been incorporated into health and safety policy of several world-leading container ports such as the Port of Dalian, P. R. China. As a result, incidents occurring in the Port of Dalian (Dalian Container Terminal) in 2018- 2019 were reduced by approx. 8% (compared to the average over the past 5 years), while the annual safety cost saving has been estimated at £250k [ Source 3]. [dates of impact: 2018-19]

  2. Usage by the shipping industry to improve transport resilience ( e.g. [RPs 2, 9]). For example, in 2018/19, by incorporating a new shipping resilience risk concept [RO 3] into COSCO’s global shipping network configuration, the system has reduced its incident-related logistics costs by an estimated 10% [ Source 4]. The new concept has led to a paradigm shift in COSCO shipping logistics practice, moving to a new mechanism that incorporates risk assessment from a global shipping network perspective. This new approach was proven successful when it was implemented as a case study on COSCO’s Asia-Africa logistics network. This success promoted the concept’s implementation by other COSCO logistics networks. [dates of impact: 2018-19]

  3. Usage by the UK rail industry to improve its performance and passenger experience ( e.g. RPs 4, 7, 8, 10).

a. The system, which is powered by algorithms from publications such as [RO 6], has enabled the Merseyrail franchise to monitor real-time train journeys in four of their busiest stations (~24 million annual rail passenger usage). The system, currently installed in Liverpool South Parkway station, a major regional multimodal transport hub, is also providing passengers with rapid and detailed real-time information in response to network disruption. It served about 200,000 passengers within the first two months of operation, receiving a score of 10/10 from staff who used it and 8/10 from passengers [ Source 5]. [dates of impact: 2019-20]

b. The system was tested by Merseyrail to anticipate and mitigate reactionary delays, which is the major source of train delays in the UK. Experiments on ~500 real train journeys showed that the system improved delay prediction accuracy in all instances [ Source 6]. [dates of impact: 2018-19]

c. The system has given Merseyrail insights into reasons and possible mitigations of slippery rail’/low railhead adhesion that has an impact on the entire Merseyrail and wider industry network. This benefits the entire Merseyrail network [ Source 6]. [dates of impact: 2019-20]

  1. The provision of cost-effective measures for road, rail and ports [RO 4] and recommendations for international bodies ( e.g., the UN) in global climate policymaking [RPs 1, 2, 9]. The identification of climate threat by major transport infrastructure via large international (30 countries) and UK national surveys [ Source 7] has helped transport stakeholders ( e.g., operators and authorities) to improve service climate resilience. It has directly shaped UN policy on “Climate Change Impact and Adaptation for International Transport Networks” ( i.e., Section 4.3.4 “Technical adaptation measures for seaports”). http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/main/wp5/publications/climate_change_2014.pdf. Specifically, our work has assisted UN policymakers to develop guidelines and approaches in climate adaptation planning in ports and transportation infrastructures by providing methods on how climate risks should be identified and how adaptation measures can be evaluated [ Source 7]. [Impact period: 2014]

  2. Assisting active travel infrastructure development and promoting active travel ( e.g. [RP 6]).

a. Utilising novel sensors and artificial intelligence techniques across the six LCR local authorities, the system gathers and analyses real-time data to support decisions such as the prioritisation of cycling/walking infrastructure development (out of 31 strategic corridors). Using inputs from the system, 57.5km green cycle/walking routes are being developed/upgraded to reduce regional GHG emissions by an estimated 334 tonnes in the period 2019-21 [ Source 8]. This saves lives and improves quality of life, since the research of the British Lung Foundation in 2020 found that 1,040 deaths per year in the LCR can be directly linked to exposure to air pollution. [Impact period: 2019-20]

b. Supporting seven regional authorities to assess current levels of walking/cycling, the impact of pollution, traffic, and measures to improve active travel. For example, using sensors located in a busy area covering over 10 schools and education settings, plus a major hospital in Liverpool, the system has informed the authority the directions of vehicles, pedestrians, and cyclists at peak time. This finding has fed into the development of a segregated lane for pedestrian/cyclists and thus benefited over 14,000 people and vehicles per day [ Source 9]. [Impact period: 2020]

  1. Helping government, local authorities and transport operators to respond to COVID-19 [RP 6].

a. Helping government and local authorities with monitoring traffic trends during lockdown. At the request of authorities, the system has been used to monitor traffic (cars, cyclists, pedestrians etc.) as well as air quality and weather across the LCR during lockdown. The data has been shared with the Department for Transport at their request, and has also been shared with the six local authorities, the Combined Authority, and the cycling/walking commissioner [ Source 8]. The data has informed the authorities of quantitative correlations between the significant increase in cycling and walking in every area of the LCR during lockdown and an improvement in air quality. It has also quantified how the public’s travel behaviour changed over the lockdown period and the impact of weather on active travel. Importantly, the data from the system has provided evidence to support local authorities’ plans for 11 emergency popup routes across the LCR, enabling people to travel safely with social distancing, and connecting them to key locations like hospitals, workplaces, and transport stations. Using algorithms from outputs such as [RO2], the system has also provided a journey planning app (available on Google and Apple app stores) that allows local authorities to input the emergency popup routes as soon as they are installed, and also monitor traffic on these routes in real-time. So far 23km of routes have been added to the journey planner. This is the first app that allows citizens to plan journeys on popup cycling/walking routes [ Source 9]. [Impact period: 2020]

b. The system has been continuously providing rail passengers, especially key workers who had to travel to work during lockdown, with key real-time journey information using our intelligent information system at Liverpool South Parkway station. During the four months of lockdown, the system benefited over 56,000 passengers [ Source 6]. [Impact period: 2020]

c. The data from the system has helped the DfT and its partners to analyse how the COVID-19 national lockdown impacted local road and cycling networks. Partly thanks to this contribution, the aforementioned work by DfT has been awarded ‘Project of the Year 2020’ at the ITS (UK) Awards, and also ‘highly commended’ for ‘Outstanding Contribution to the COVID-19 Response’ at the British Construction Industry Awards 2020. The project team at LJMU have been issued with a certificate for this contribution [ Source 10]. [Impact period: 2020]

Some relevant events and public awards that have enhanced public awareness of the research:

  • Newton Prize 2017 runner up and Highly Commended recognition (one of only 3 Highly Commended projects in 2017).

  • Shortlisted for the Mersey Maritime innovation award 2018.

  • Invited speech at the industry event “Data Sandbox: Improving Network Performance”, organized by the RSSB, with more than 200 industry representatives, 2018.

  • Included as an example of UK research on the theme "Sea and Trade routes" in the German Ministry of Education and Research’s Science Year: 2016-2017.

  • One of top 1% projects chosen by British Council to feature on their global website as Newton Fund success stories https://www.britishcouncil.org/education/science/newton/success-stories, https://www.britishcouncil.org/reducing-vietnams-port-emissions-using-new-technologies.

  • Highlighted on the official social media site of the British Embassy in Vietnam as a successful example of collaboration between research organisations, government, NGOs and industries.

  • Broadcast by Vietnam state television news (Haiphong TV) and recognised by regional newspapers.

5. Sources to corroborate the impact

Source 1 - IT Manager, VICONSHIP (Vietnam Container Shipping Corporation), Vietnam.

Source 2 - Deputy Chief Operating Officer, Peel Ports, UK.

Source 3 - Safety Manager, Dalian Container Terminal Co. Ltd., P. R. China.

Source 4 - Logistics Division Manager, COSCO Shipping Logistics, P. R. China.

Source 5 - Station Compliance Manager, Merseyrail, UK.

Source 6 - Performance Delivery Manager, Merseyrail, UK.

Source 7 - UN climate adaptation working group expert member, UN.

Source 8 - Manager, Liverpool City Region Combined Authority, UK.

Source 9 - Manager, Merseytravel, UK.

Source 10 - ITS Policy Lead, Department for Transport & the Transport Technology Forum, UK.

Submitting institution
Liverpool John Moores University
Unit of assessment
12 - Engineering
Summary impact type
Technological
Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
No

1. Summary of the impact

This ICS builds on the world-class abrasives research within the Unit that has helped transform global industrial grinding practice. The research addresses ever-increasing demand for better quality and higher productivity, focusing on high efficiency deep grinding (HEGD) and mass finishing (MF). It has shaped government strategy in additive manufacturing and the development of innovative next-generation abrasive technologies. It has directly resulted in the realisation of a £2.5m factory, built in the UK (2017) for high volume production of an advanced abrasive tool possessing environmental credentials in a sector valued circa US$33.9 billion in 2020. The research has also directly led to the improvement of performance and productivity of a number of industrial companies including Landis-Lund, Jinan Kechuang, Saint-Gobain Abrasives Ltd., Jones & Shipman, British Glass, OTEC and Croft.

2. Underpinning research

The underpinning research in this ICS builds on 20 years of world-class abrasives research that has helped transform global industrial grinding practice. By addressing current challenges, the research broadens abrasive machining applications. The key research insights and findings include:

[a] Research in high efficiency deep grinding (HEDG), initially led by Prof. Brian Rowe [ RO1, RG1], has resulted in a tenfold increase in material removal rate (up to 2000 mm3/mm/s) and a fivefold reduction in specific energy (down to 6~7 J/mm3). The models developed for grinding kinematics, mechanics and thermal heat transfer has provided the insights for optimising grinding performance [ RO2,3].

[b] Fundamental research of abrasive machining, focused on the workpiece-to-tool interactions, has led to pioneering work in the material removal mechanics, high efficiency deep grinding processes, special fluid delivery systems, and minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) for grinding processes [ RO1,2,4, RG2,3,4]. The outcomes of these research studies have been adopted in abrasive tools, machine tools, automotive and aerospace industry sectors [ RG5-9]. A digital-based process optimisation tool (POSY) was developed [ RG5,6] for production decision support and process cost estimation [ RO5].

[c] Based on the research foundations established in [b] above, a new glass abrasive tool has been developed as the first innovation in this field for more than 50 years, for the mass finishing (MF) industry, with improved process insight and understanding [ RO5, RG4-6]. This evolution of direction resulted in the funded collaborative research with industry [ RG5,6] in the emerging area of metal additive manufacturing, a technology strongly reliant on the capability of surface finishing for its wider industry uptake, as well as in the fast-growing biomedical engineering sector. The research direction has been increasingly focused on the wider disciplines of digital engineering, robotics, and numerical modelling.

[d] Research into intelligent machine control systems has led to new adaptive controlled grinding process systems [ RO3, RG1]. This resulted in the development of a servo-assisted manual machine tool control system (SAMM) that was taken forward to production by an international machine tool manufacturer [ RO2, RG8]. Artificial Intelligence-based methodologies coupled with the adaptive control strategies led to the development of the first fully-integrated intelligent grinding machine control [ RO6] that is now a commonplace system integration. This system reduces operator management and intervention. With an optimised grinding cycle based on on-line monitoring, the grinding cycle time was reduced by up to 50%. This breakthrough attracted an international collaboration with the University of Shanghai for Science and Technology (USST) and Ningbo Great Group Co. Ltd. [ RO3].

The research was carried out in collaboration with a wide range of manufacture-industry partners and supported through external funding of over £3m from sources including the EPSRC, Innovate UK, EU, and industry from 2000 to 2020 [ RGs 1-9].

3. References to the research

Six underpinning research outputs are given below:

RO1 - Rowe W.B., Tan J. (2001), “Temperatures in High Efficiency Deep Grinding (HEDG)”, Annals of CIRP, Vol.50(1), pp. 205-208 ( http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)62105-2).

RO2 - Morgan M.N., Jackson A.R., Baines-Jones V., Batako A., Wu H., Rowe W.B. (2008), “Optimisation of fluid delivery in grinding”, Annals of the CIRP, Vol.57(1), pp. 363-366 ( https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2008.03.090).

RO3 - Chi Y., Li H., Chen X. (2017), “In-process monitoring and analysis of bearing outer race way grinding based on the power signal”, Proc IMechE Part B: J Engineering Manufacture, Vol.231(4), pp. 2622–2635 ( https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405416635032).

RO4 - Batako A.D.L., Tsiakoumis V. (2015), “An experimental investigation into resonance dry grinding of hardened steel and nickel alloys with element of MQL”, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol.77(1-4), pp. 27-41 ( https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6380-8).

RO5 - Jamal M., Morgan M.N., Peavoy D. (2017), “A digital process optimization, process design and process informatics system for high energy abrasive mass finishing”, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol.92, pp. 303-319 ( https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0124-5).

RO6 - Morgan M.N., Cai R., Guidotti A., Allanson D.R., Moruzzi J.L., Rowe W.B. (2007), “Design and implementation of an Intelligent Grinding Assistant (IGA) system”, Invited paper – Inaugural Issue International, International Journal of Abrasives Technology, Vol.1(1), pp. 105-135, ( https://doi.org/10.1504/IJAT.2007.013853).

Each cited research output underwent a rigorous peer-review process prior to publication.

Major research grants associated with this impact case study include:

RG1 - “Precision Grinding with Vitrified CBN”, EPSRC (GR/M35161/01), 1999- 2002, £348,636, PI: B.W. Rowe.

RG2 - EPSRC GR/R68795 (2002-2005), “A new grinding regime - Thermal limitations to material removal by grinding”, £239,934, in partnership with Castrol Int., De Beers Industrial Diamonds (UK), Renold Engineering, Weston Electrical Units Ltd, Unova UK Ltd, Saint-Gobain Abrasives and Metostress with £520k of additional industrial support, PI: B.W. Rowe.

RG3 - EPSRC GR/S82350 (2004-2007), “Optimisation of Fluid Application in Grinding”, £322,959, in partnership with Holroyd Machine Tools, Cinetic, Wendt Boart Ltd, Cosworth Racing Ltd, Dantec Dynamics and Castrol Int, PI: M. Morgan.

RG4 - EPSRC EP/N022998/1 (2016–2019), “Process design for next generation mass finishing technologies”, £329,978, in partnership with MTC, Fintek, Potters-Ballotini, GTS, Allens Cranshafts, Repclif and Sharmic, PI: M. Morgan.

RG5 - Innovate UK [TSB 101275] (2013–2016), “Thermally treated recycled glass as a vibratory finishing abrasive”, £570,000, in partnership with MTC, Vibraglaz, Potters-Ballotini, Fintek, GTS and Rolls-Royce, PI: M. Morgan.

RG6 - Innovate UK [IUK - 132873] (2017–2018), “Metal AM process informatics for improved surface finish of complex parts”, £165,000, in partnership with MTC, Croft Additive Manufacturing Ltd and Fintek, PI: M. Morgan.

RG7 - “Research into vibration assisted grinding of advanced materials”, Rolls-Royce (R266030), 2012 -2015, £103,700, PI: A. Batako.

RG8 - “Vibration assisted high efficiency deep grinding - A strategy for eco-machining”, TSB/InnovateUK (BD133H), 2009-2010, £218,550, PI: A. Batako.

RG9 - “Micron diamond processing of advanced ceramics”, Element Six, 2013-2019, £88,000; PI: X. Chen.

4. Details of the impact

Sustainable development for a smart future requires novel manufacturing technologies capable of producing continually evolving precision components, for improved product performance with lower energy consumption and higher productivity. Underpinning research that has been conducted since 2000 has brought significant impacts over the assessment period.

A. High Efficiency Deep Grinding (HEDG)

The HEDG offers a fivefold reduction in energy consumption and material removal rates up to 10 times higher than prevailing common practice. The maximum material removal rate achieved by the most advanced commercial grinding machine is 200 mm3/mm/s compared to 1000-2000 mm3/mm/s achieved by HEDG. It cuts down the grinding specific energy from over 120 J/mm3 (400 J/m3 for nickel alloy) to an average of just 7-10J/mm3 [ RO1, RG1,2].

Partner Landis-Lund, a branch of an industrial engineering group, Fives, has used the HEDG in its twin crankshaft grinders worldwide since 2013 [ SC1]. The results show the grinding cycle time was reduced by 50% thus doubling the production. Specific grinding energy has reduced from 43 J/mm3 to 7 J/mm3 with an associated specific grinding material removal rate of 2000 mm3/mm/s. With annual production of around 120 machines and a grinding capacity of some 1,000,000 parts per year, the impact on the bottom line has been significant. “… A mechanism for predicting an acceptable rough grinding regime has been built into the decision process for production engineering in our cylindrical component manufacturing. Landis-Lund have been able to add a reliable tool backed by solid research evidence that allows competitive tendering for work which would otherwise have been seen as beyond the capacity of present machine configuration” [ SC1].

Saint-Gobain Abrasives Ltd has also benefited from the HEDG. “In this particular case the research shows us a way to extend the area of application for grinding wheels into areas formally held by milling. This has helped Saint-Gobain move outside traditional areas of grinding with HEDG” [ SC2].

International engagement led to the development of novel Lithia-glass-ceramic bonded wheels that have very high wear resistance and 2-3 times longer life than their counterparts. “…The joint work with LJMU has helped us position the developed bond on the market and secure over $0.5m financial support from the Chinese government and other private equities to set up our own new factory of grinding wheel production in the High and New Technology Development Zone, in Jinan of Shandong Province, as ‘Jinan Kechuang Super Hard Material Products Co. Ltd’...” (Director X.F. Zhang) [ SC3].

B. Vibration Assisted High Efficiency Deep Grinding (Vibro-HEDG)

Innovation in low frequency vibration assisted HEDG, “Vibro-HEDG”, attracted six industrial collaborators from the grinding process supply chain - Jones & Shipman (machine tool manufacturer), Tyrolit (grinding wheel manufacturer), Fuchs (cutting fluid manufacturer), Bosch Rexroth (drives and controls manufacturer), Joloda International Ltd (heavy lifting gear manufacturer), and Winbro Group Technologies (aerospace parts manufacturer) [ RG8]. As a result of the collaboration, a theory was developed [ RO4] and an oscillatory motion was experimentally added to the process. Subsequently, Jones and Shipman designed and manufactured the world’s first commercial prototype of this machine in 2014. This concept has also been adopted by Blohm in Germany to develop a highly efficient (‘Prokos’) grinding technology, which is a direct industrial application of the Unit’s work in low frequency oscillation/vibration of the workpiece.

Technical Services Coordinator of Jones & Shipman stated “…As a grinding machine manufacturer with an international market presence … experience with … HEDG shows that there is a large market available, especially in the aerospace industry. Currently available machine tools have … reached their limit of machining speeds. A step change in speed and efficiency… Vibro-HEDG gives increased machining rates and at the same time reduces energy requirements by 30%. With the introduction of this new product, our market share has been growing in Europe and more significantly in emerging markets such as China, India and Brazil….” [ SC4].

C. The Mass Finishing (MF) Abrasive Product

Fundamental research of MF with glass abrasives has led to a new abrasive tool based wholly on thermally treated recycled glass that was conceived and developed for the mass finishing industry [ RG4-6]. The tool has a proven capability and strong environmental credentials. The research initiated collaboration between LJMU and the UK HVM Catapult, which was the catalyst for the formation of regional Manufacturing Technology Centre (MTC) located at LJMU, the MTC@LJMU, rebranded (2019) as MTC@Liverpool to better reflect its wider regional remit.

The MF research has directly led to Potters-Vibraglaz building a new £2.5m factory in the UK (Barnsley) for high volume production of the abrasive product [ RO5] within a sector valued circa £1B/annum, immediately creating 8 new jobs. Sales revenue reached £1.2m in the first two years of production (2017 -2019) [ SC5]. The Technical Director (Potters-Ballotini/Vibraglaz), Mr S. Vaughan, stated: “…The cooperation over the past decade with Professor Morgan and his team has been invaluable in supporting and contributing to the development of this product. This has widened our product range in both the general purpose and niche markets for finishing products, and has added opportunity to extend our customer base and approach to sales and marketing. …” [ SC5].

The product uses only recycled/recyclable glass and offers a method of finishing that is more environmentally beneficial than any other process technology. It also offers a cost saving of 40% per tonne of media due to legislative compliance, waste management, and tool economies [ SC6]. The Principal Technologist of GTS, Mr. M. Marshall states: “... this has added to our baseline understanding ...and also aided our understanding of how thermal processing and physical forming in the laboratory needs to be developed when the technique comes to scale up and exploitation…the team at LJMU brought their experience and abilities to bear to make progress and deliver results” [ SC6].

D. Process Optimisation Methodology

The POSY system [ RO5] offers cost savings (2019) associated with pre-production evaluation of new components in the order £2000<Costs<£5000 per part, with new parts commonly arriving at weekly intervals [ SC7]. Technical Director of Fintek states: “…The finishing results were outstanding and demonstrated the benefit of this POSY approach. I commend Professor Morgan and his research team on the quality and usefulness of this research work. Working with LJMU has increased our industry standing and we are now regarded as Surface Finishing Specialists throughout many fields - particularly additive manufacturing” [ SC7].

The system delivers optimised processes for many other applications including pharmaceutical, food processing, agriculture and automotive. This system’s flexibility has directly led to its adoption by the MTC to support a number of high value projects, for example, the £14.3m DRAMA project over 3 years [ SC7]. “…The Process Optimisation system ……is unique and transformative as it now allows a process, which is dependent on the control of numerous parameters each having variable effect, to be designed to perform at an optimal set of conditions without extensive and expensive prior testing. A real benefit of the approach is the genericity and ease of application” [ SC7].

The world-leading research on 3-D discrete element modelling (DEM) for simulation of granular fluidised flows within MF processes [ RG4, RO5] provided a new capability for realistic low cost exploration of the processes responsible for surface evolution within MF processes. This simulator improves the understanding of process physics and impacts machine tool design through optimised process economics and performance. Through collaboration with LJMU, OTEC GmbH, Germany, the European leader in advanced mass finishing technologies, has exploited this advance in the design of their most advanced machines to assist with wear avoidance. “The effect of the increased knowledge has led to selling one additional finishing machine per year of approx. 80.000-100.000 €” for OTEC” [ SC8].

The work on grinding cycle optimisation strategies [ RO3] has been used by Ningbo Great Group Co. Ltd. in China, securing more than 30% improvement of productivity in the production line of bearings. From 2016 to 2020, the implementation of these strategies directly resulted in financial benefit averaging ¥7m (£790k) per year, giving the company a competitive edge in the roller bearing market, which was valued at $21.3 billion in 2018. “The application of your cycle optimisation strategies and grinding process parameter optimisation has positively impacted on our company performance in terms of the production time saving, the improvement of bearing grinding efficiency, and greatly improved our company's product quality. Sustained application of your technology secured an increasing improvement by more than 30% in the production efficiency of relevant products amounting to a total of ¥21m (£2.37m) gain from March 2016 to the end of 2019” [ SC9].

E. Metal Additive Manufacturing (AM) Research

The research in this area categorically demonstrated that MF processes can be designed to deliver high-quality surface finishes on AM parts possessing a complex geometry [ RO5]. The research [ RG4] demonstrated the benefit of two-stage finishing systems, which has important implications for the design of the finishing cell and has resulted in the development of a new finishing capability within the MTC [ SC7].

A further key outcome from the partnership with Croft was the enhancement to the POSY (a single objective system) that elevated it to a multi-response optimisation system [ RO5]. The advanced POSY system was successfully applied to their AM production of bespoke and advanced filter and filtration assembly components. The Technical Director of Croft AM, Dr L. Geekie states: “This challenging project has delivered an in-process control for the production of AM components to target surface finish requirements and has proven the benefit of high energy mass finishing processes for high specification external finishing…” [ SC10].

5. Sources to corroborate the impact

SC1: R&D Director, Landis-Lund (Cinetic Landis Grinding Ltd), UK.

SC2: R&D Manager, Vitreous Bond Super-Abrasive, Saint-Gobain Abrasives Ltd., UK.

SC3: Director, Jinan Kechuang Super Hard Material Products Co. Ltd., China.

SC4: Technical Services Coordinator, Jones & Shipman, UK

SC5: Tech Manager, Potters Ballotini / Vibraglaz, UK.

SC6: Principal Technologist, British Glass (GTS), UK.

SC7: Technical Director, Fintek, UK; Principal Research Engineer, MTC, UK.

SC8: Managing Director, Company OTEC GmbH, Germany.

SC9: Manager of Equipment, Ningbo Great Group Co. Ltd, Zhejiang, China.

SC10: Technical Director, Croft AM.

Showing impact case studies 1 to 4 of 4

Filter by higher education institution

UK regions
Select one or more of the following higher education institutions and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No higher education institutions found.
Institutions

Filter by unit of assessment

Main panels
Select one or more of the following units of assessment and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No unit of assessments found.
Units of assessment

Filter by continued case study

Select one or more of the following states and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.

Filter by summary impact type

Select one or more of the following summary impact types and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.

Filter by impact UK location

UK Countries
Select one or more of the following UK locations and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No UK locations found.
Impact UK locations

Filter by impact global location

Continents
Select one or more of the following global locations and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No global locations found.
Impact global locations

Filter by underpinning research subject

Subject areas
Select one or more of the following underpinning research subjects and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No subjects found.
Underpinning research subjects