Skip to main

Impact case study database

The impact case study database allows you to browse and search for impact case studies submitted to the REF 2021. Use the search and filters below to find the impact case studies you are looking for.

Search and filter

Filter by

  • University of Chester
   None selected
  • 14 - Geography and Environmental Studies
   None selected
   None selected
   None selected
   None selected
   None selected
   None selected
Waiting for server
Download currently selected sections for currently selected case studies (spreadsheet) (generating)
Download currently selected case study PDFs (zip) (generating)
Download tags for the currently selected case studies (spreadsheet) (generating)
Currently displaying text from case study section
Showing impact case studies 1 to 2 of 2
Submitting institution
University of Chester
Unit of assessment
14 - Geography and Environmental Studies
Summary impact type
Societal
Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
No

1. Summary of the impact

The surge in mobile devices and tablet computing afforded an exciting opportunity to make learning more mobile, thereby increasing efficiency and broadening the opportunities available to field-based teaching through the use of these novel technologies. As a result of our research into mobile learning, there has been:

  • transformed teaching practice of staff in 222 Higher and Further Education (HE/FE) institutions, both nationally and internationally

  • transformed perceptions about the use of technology for field work teaching in 101 institutions

  • enhanced student engagement and employability skills

  • augmented sales for 8 companies as a result of the technologies and book chapters purchased

  • expansion of 1 learned society

  • 3 new collaborations between external partners, which empowered Field Studies Council staff, saved time in the field for students, led to better technical solutions for EDINA and the Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI), and shared best practice within the Joint Information Systems Centre (JISC)

2. Underpinning research

Funding from the Higher Education Academy resulted in the creation of a multi-disciplinary team from the Universities of Chester (lead institution), Reading and Sheffield, which conducted research focused on the application of mobile technologies to solve pedagogic issues faced by practitioners and students during fieldwork. Known as the ‘Enhancing Fieldwork Learning’ (EFL) Team, the University of Chester staff involved were:

  • Derek France (1993-present, Professor of Pedagogy in Geographical Sciences, Principal Investigator)

  • Katharine Welsh (2010-present, Postdoctoral Researcher (2010-2013), Visiting Lecturer and Researcher (2013-2016), Senior Lecturer (2016-present)

  • Victoria Powell (2012-2013, Postdoctoral Researcher to cover maternity leave)

The partner staff and institutions involved with the research were:

  • Julian Park (1994-present, Pro-Vice Chancellor (Education), University of Reading)

  • Alice Mauchline (2003-present, Senior Research Fellow, University of Reading)

  • Brian Whalley (2010-present, Emeritus Professor, University of Sheffield)

  • Katherine Clark (2015-present, Postdoctoral Researcher, University of Reading)

The estimated Research Contribution from the University of Chester is as follows:

  • Conception of the research idea: 50%

  • Data Collection: 70%

  • Journal publications: 65%

  • Books and Book Chapters: 50%

  • Workshops and conference outputs: 60%

Early research [R1] identified that 50% (n=89) practitioners wanted to integrate technology into fieldwork in order to develop student digital literacy, and 66% (n=89) also wanted to use technology to speed up data processing and analysis whilst out in the field. Furthermore, as a result of the increase to student tuition fees in 2012/13, and consequent university budgetary constraints and existing financial burdens for students, we [R2] identified that 23% (n=27) of Geography, Earth and Environmental Science departments in the UK planned to replace residential fieldwork with individual day trips, thereby demonstrating a clear need to increase time efficiency, whilst students were out in the field, in order to achieve the learning outcomes.

To remedy the issues identified, our subsequent research [R1,R3,R5] presented the first substantial investigation into the application of tablets, smart devices and the concept of Bring Your Own Device (BYOD i.e. where students use their personal devices in the classroom/field) for fieldwork. We were able to demonstrate that by deploying cost-effective, portable devices e.g. tablets, time spent collecting and analysing data in the field was more efficient. We [R1] identified that 20% (n=89) of practitioners felt that staff reluctance or incompetence was a barrier to introducing technology into fieldwork, and subsequent research [R5] further supported this finding with practitioners perceiving a lack of support both for those using and who want to use BYOD within their fieldwork.

Our findings outlined that the upskilling of staff, to ensure they were sufficiently digitally literate, was a vital part of enhancing student digital literacy, employability and experience. Further research [R3, R5] demonstrated that students were comfortable with using mobile and app-driven technologies for academic purposes, as they required significantly less “set-up” time due to student familiarity with the devices, thereby saving further time when out in the field. The findings suggested that providing students with the opportunity to personalise their own learning by using their own devices, further enhanced time efficiency during field work, which resulted in enhanced student engagement. Finally, our work on graduate attributes [R4] demonstrated an encouraging insight in that students recognise the relationship between mobile app use from fieldwork learning and how this influences their wider skill set for employability purposes.

3. References to the research

This selection of research outputs underpins a nationally recognised double award-winning project. Outputs R1 and R3-R5 have been published in international journals that require rigorous peer-review. Output R2 is a primary research report which was commissioned by the Higher Education Academy and was peer reviewed by the subject lead, Dr Helen Walkington.

[R1] Welsh, K.E., Mauchline, A.L., France, D., Park, J., and Whalley B. (2013) Enhancing Fieldwork Learning with technology: practitioner’s perspectives, Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 37 (3), 399-415. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2013.792042 [R2] Welsh, K.E. and France, D. (2012) The Future of Higher Education Fieldwork in

Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences. The Higher Education Academy STEM Report. https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/The-Future-of-Higher-Education-Fieldwork-GEES_2012.pdf [R3] Welsh, K.E., Mauchline, A., Powell, V., France, D., Park, J.R., and Whalley, W.B. (2015) Student perceptions of iPads as mobile learning devices for fieldwork. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 39 (3), 450-469. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2015.1066315 [R4] France, D. , Powell, V., Welsh, K.E., Mauchline, A.M, Park, J.R., and Whalley, W.B. (2016) Ability of students to recognize the relationship between using mobile apps for learning during fieldwork and the development of graduate attributes. Journal of Geography in Higher Education,

40 (2), 182-192. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2016.1154931

[R5] Clark, K. A., Welsh, K. E., Mauchline, A. L., France, D., Whalley, W. B., and Park, J. (2020). Do educators realise the value of Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) in fieldwork learning? Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2020.1808880

Grants awarded which directly funded research

[G1] France, D., Park, J.R, Whalley, W.B. (2010-2013) “ Personalised Learning Environments in Active Field Science”, Higher Education Academy - National Teaching Fellowship scheme (NTFS), £198,489.

[G2] Welsh, K.E. & France, D. (2012) “The Future of Fieldwork in GEES”, Higher Education Academy Invited Report, £1,500.

[G3] Mauchline, A., France, D., Welsh, K., Park, J.R, Whalley, W.B. (2015) “Practitioners Perspectives of Bring Your Own Device for Fieldwork” British Ecological Society Funding £2,000.

4. Details of the impact

We have achieved the impacts described below through national and international dissemination events (01/08/13-31/07/20), including 7 participatory events, 15 conferences, and 18 workshops across 4 continents, where, for the first time, a range of interdisciplinary educators were exposed to the concept of using mobile technologies to enhance their fieldwork practice. This has resulted in impact for the following beneficiary groups:

National and international impact on teaching staff in HE/FE
  • Our research findings outlined the need to support educators to effectively embed technology into fieldwork. The team therefore ran 7 participatory events, where 222 educators from 66 UK and 18 international HE/FE providers, 14 non-academic organisations, and 3 schools were able to gain practical experience of applying mobile technology in a fieldwork environment. This has led to 222 upskilled and more digitally literate educators, many of whom have embedded skills learned at the events into their own fieldwork practice: “The video compilation exercises [from the event] have given me the confidence to produce my own videos to explain troublesome concepts.” [S1a], “I gained confidence in the use of technology and have no fears about using iPads and mobile phones in fieldwork.” [S1b].

  • Where practitioners have embedded mobile devices, fieldwork has been more efficient, saving students time and reducing departmental costs “The iPads have been embedded into the Conservation Biology activities to help address staff-student ratios, so the ~60 students feel adequately supported and have confidence to complete the task in a timely fashion.” [S2a]; “The EFL project has had a significant impact on MSc teaching in SBS…at the end of the field practical session the results from individual student groups were then realised on screen as an annotated campus map and a discussion of strengths, weaknesses and lessons-learned” [S2b].

  • Educator attitudes towards technology have been transformed. The EFL team won an Advance HE Collaborative Award for Teaching Excellence (CATE) in 2018 with an additional ‘spotlight’ recognition received at the awards ceremony for “multi-institutional and multi-disciplinary collaboration which demonstrated a transformational impact on attitudes towards the use of technology to enhance fieldwork learning” [S3a].

Impact on national and international students in HE/FE

Our research and events have led to educator upskilling, therefore students nationally and internationally have:

  • Benefitted from enhanced learning as they are more engaged during their time in the field “Bringing digital stories into my fieldwork teaching practice has actively engaged my students” [S4a]; “[it] enhanced the way in which students engage with qualitative data in the field…this developed both student and tutor confidence in their applicability to everyday teaching” [S4b];” [it has]… made group work more engaging” [S4c]. Students also recognised how the technology had engaged them “it helped me think and expand upon ideas and problems” [S4d].

  • Improved their digital literacy and enhanced inclusion “Having made a video [at the EFL event] ... my 1st year students now produce a 4 min video on a research topic.” [S5a]; “I've been told that the ways in which I've been able to help people use technology to support fieldwork has been transformational…The EFL community really champion education and are open to adopting inclusive approaches to education, the work I'm able to do has been inspired and informed by the collaborations and conversations I've had with EFL attendees” [S5b].

  • Enhanced their employability skills “I attended the workshop ... we learned how to use technology in the field ... I took iPads/minis on an ERASMUS-funded trip to Iceland in 2014… Students make videos from their photos and videos and these are uploaded onto a WordPress site …I use the blog/video when writing student references. My fieldtrip partners with UMass Dartmouth (USA), EAFIT and Universidad de Antioquia (Colombia) and University of Akureyri (Iceland). The UMass colleague also now incorporates a blog and video website within their teaching. The pan-European nature of the trip ensured a wide dissemination of good practice...” [S6a]; “Students are able to learn new skills as well as the traditional learning from a field course... We have uploaded all their films to the department’s YouTube channel, providing them each with a web presence which is useful for their employability” [S6b].

  • Transformed their perceptions of using mobile devices for fieldwork. Our research [R3] showed that 72% of students (n= 173) stated that their perceptions of using devices had improved during the course of the fieldwork. Some students described a complete change in their perceptions of using the device “from feeling sceptical to feeling dependent on its use.” [S3b]

Impact on teaching staff and students in secondary schools and further education

  • Digital literacy has also improved in 3 schools as a result of engagement with our research and events, “I've taught hundreds of students in the time since [the event], and they have been exposed to new ideas, technology, Google Forms, VR and other exciting opportunities” [S7].
Impact on non-academic organisations

As a result of attending an EFL, new collaborations between organisations occurred and further impact within those organisations took place.

  • Collaboration between the Field Studies Council and The Open University to develop the Field Network System which “enables the FSC to extend the time students spend in the field and facilitates student discussion of their results by enabling them to contextualise their findings at the fieldwork site,” thereby engaging the students and enabling deeper learning [S8a].

  • Collaboration between EFL, EDINA and ESRI led to better technological solutions to field-based problems being developed: “[Event] participants gave invaluable feedback on our Fieldwork GB app… through our involvement with the project we feel more confident that we are building useful tools and understand the needs of potential users” [S8b].

  • Through attending the EFL event, further good practice has been applied and shared by colleagues at the Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC) both nationally and internationally: “The events that Katharine [EFL] facilitated were designed to foster and share innovation and I took away numerous ideas…I was able to take this new knowledge skillset back into my practice and it influenced workshops that I ran for the HE and FE sectors on technology enhanced learning, particularly digital storytelling that I was also able to incorporate into presentations at an international and UK conference” [S8c].

Impact on learned societies

As a result of our research, events and collaboration, there has been an expansion of the British Ecological Society with the formation of a Teaching and Learning Special Interest Group: “Our relationship with the EFL has helped the BES demonstrate and build support for.... teaching-focussed members ... a special interest group.... supporting early career researchers and lecturers in developing their teaching practice” [S9].

Commercial Impact
  • There have been 4,657 chapter downloads of the book written by the project team, which totals a commercial impact for Springer (publisher) of £93,093.43 in sales [S10a].

  • As a result of direct engagement with our research and dissemination events, 6 UK institutions [S2a, S4c, S10d, S10e, S10f, S10g, S10h] are known to have purchased their own field-based mobile technologies, leading to commercial impacts for 8 companies [S10]: Apple, Samsung, Panasonic, Griffin, GoPro, Oculus, Raspberry Pi and Proscope. The Field Studies Council [S10b] has also estimated that they have purchased at least 250 tablet devices (Apple and Android). The total commercial impact for technology companies is estimated to be £199,978.74 [S10c].

5. Sources to corroborate the impact

Corroborating Statements

[S1] HE/FE Educators are more digitally literate (HE Staff quotes from Keele University and Northumbria University)

[S2] Fieldwork is more efficient (HE Staff quotes from Keele University and University of Reading)

[S3] Transforming perceptions about technology enhanced fieldwork (Advance HE Collaborative Award for Teaching Excellence and student quote)

[S4] Students are more engaged in their fieldwork (HE Staff quotes from Massey University, University of Chester, Bangor University and student quote)

[S5] Students have enhanced digital literacy (HE Staff quotes from Liverpool John Moores University and Open University)

[S6] Students have enhanced employability skills (HE Staff quotes from University of Reading and University of Southampton)

[S7] Students in schools benefitting from embedding of field-based technology (Teacher quote from King’s Ely School)

[S8] External Collaborations (Quotes from Open University, EDINA, JISC)

[S9] Impact on Learned Societies (Quotes from British Ecological Society)

[S10] Commercial Impact (chapter downloads, Quotes from Field Studies Council Educational Technology Tutor, Institutional technology purchases at University of Reading, University of Chester, Manchester Metropolitan University, University of Southampton and Bangor University)

Submitting institution
University of Chester
Unit of assessment
14 - Geography and Environmental Studies
Summary impact type
Societal
Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
No

1. Summary of the impact

The Rural Public Access WiFi Service (PAWS) study and the research activity that followed facilitated digital inclusion in a commercially ‘hard to reach’ remote rural community - businesses and households that either did not have access to broadband services, or only to services not ‘fit for purpose’. Ultimately, the connection of users (rural residents and businesses) to better broadband services was achieved at a local level. The reported economic and social impacts of this connectivity, such as business savings, productivity gains, and enhanced wellbeing, have been used to demonstrate the importance of overcoming digital exclusion in rural areas. Accordingly, the work has made a substantial contribution to UK policy consultation processes, the outcomes of which aid government decision-making to alleviate rural disadvantage in broadband connectivity.

2. Underpinning research

Amid a phenomenal pace of technological change, stubborn social, economic, and territorial divides remain between those who are digitally connected and those who are not. In the UK, as territorial remoteness and population sparsity increases, the commercial investment case for broadband provision weakens, thereby increasing the likelihood of those territories having no or very poor broadband connectivity. The households and businesses affected are referred to as ‘the final few’ [R1, R2]. Against a policy backdrop of UK Government efforts to improve mobile and fixed network infrastructures and coverage, coupled with a prevailing ‘Digital by Default’ public services agenda, the ‘final few’ pose a problem. The research project (Rural PAWS) addressed this problem by enabling internet connectivity for a commercially ‘hard to reach’ rural area (UK) [R1]. A longitudinal evaluation of subsequent internet connectivity experiences and user behaviour has led to a better understanding of the needs and requirements of remote rural users, which in turn has informed broader policy narratives concerned with digital exclusion [R3, R4, R5].

Dr Fiona Williams joined the University of Chester as a full-time Senior Lecturer in Human Geography in February 2016. Prior, Williams was a Senior Post Doctoral Research Fellow (PDRF) on Rural PAWS - a two-year (2013-15) interdisciplinary (Geography and Internet Engineering), University of Aberdeen dot.rural project aiming to facilitate digital inclusion. This project also involved Professor John Farrington and Dr Lorna Philip (Geography and Environment, University of Aberdeen), Dr Althaff Mohideen and Professor Gorry Fairhurst (School of Engineering, University of Aberdeen). A commercially hard to reach rural community in South Shropshire provided the trial case study area, the English context making the project unique in the mainly Scottish dot.rural suite. Narrow sampling parameters required a high degree of local knowledge to recruit suitable participants. Williams, with links ‘in situ’, proved invaluable in the recruitment and retention of participants - those meeting the study criteria, that is, exhibiting technical connectivity barriers (e.g. inadequate or no broadband provision) and non-technical connectivity barriers (e.g. low levels of computer literacy but with access to family / friends support networks) and collectively illustrating variable remote rural connectivity household and business scenarios. Dot.rural project funding ended in 2015. The University of Chester supported Williams in developing research and evaluation activity extending well beyond the Rural PAWS project funding and remit. A productive publishing relationship with Philip (Aberdeen) was also maintained. Support to participating households and businesses, and the longitudinal evaluation of them, was funded and formalised in 2016, via a series of internal (University of Chester) research grants totalling £3,500 [section B3]. Williams, employed by the University of Chester and located in the study area, continued to work with project participants [R4], managing the transition to alternative internet providers and monitoring user practices. Understanding the ongoing needs of users and the shifting landscape of internet provision enabled Williams to engage with, and inform the decisions of, the policy community [R3, R5].

The Rural PAWS project provided participants with free access to a satellite-based, rate-limited (for bandwidth-hungry functions) broadband service. The study examined the extent to which local demand for improved connectivity could be stimulated to bring ‘hard to reach’ communities online and allow previously digitally excluded people to enter a digital society [R1, R2]. Avanti Communications plc, a global satellite provider, was an industry partner, providing hardware, installation, and bandwidth for experimentation purposes. Satellite broadband technology was deployed at no cost to eight participating households (17 permanent users and four occasional users), previously unserved or underserved by broadband connectivity; six of the participating households ran micro-businesses from home in sectors representative of the community being studied. The subsequent digital behaviour and internet experiences of participants was examined via a series of ‘in situ’ qualitative household interviews (pre, during and post Rural PAWS deployment plus longitudinal follow-up interviews), user diaries and a researcher diary [R1, R4].

At the outset, the underpinning research revealed significant territorial connectivity barriers in the case study community, with households either unserved or underserved by broadband infrastructure [R2]. The Rural PAWS model uncovered a range of additional digital participation barriers: motivation, levels of digital literacy, perceived utility and value of the internet, and the capabilities and limitations of available internet services [R1]. Initial perceptions of the free Rural PAWS service varied considerably according to household and business context, although on decommissioning Rural PAWS, and with the assistance of Williams, all participants elected to pay to remain connected to a commercial Internet Service Provider (ISP). Demand for digital connectivity was stimulated, benefitting an alternative local service provider [R3]. Significant behaviour change was observed by Williams, aligned with user experiences and the perceived quality of broadband provision [R4]. Participants were highly embedded in the locality (necessarily as a result of rural business activities, or through a strong desire to live in a rural context), negating any option of relocation to areas with better broadband [R4]. Greater utility of the internet, and the perceived added value attributed to internet use, was apparent among household businesses and those working from home. Digital engagement and digital literacy among older generation households was encouraged and enhanced through internet availability. Insights gained by Williams into the changing behaviours associated with internet adoption, use, and progression in the rural context have made a significant contribution to a growing body of academic evidence and associated policy developments [R3, R5].

3. References to the research

[R1] Williams, F., Philip, L., Fairhurst, G. Farrington, J. 2016. ‘Digital by Default’ and ‘the hard to reach’: exploring solutions to digital exclusion in remote rural areas. Local Economy 31, 757-777 https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0269094216670938

[R2] Philip, L., Cottrill, C., Farrington, J., Williams, F., Ashmore, F. 2017. The digital divide: patterns, policy and options for connecting the final few in rural communities across Great Britain. Journal of Rural Studies 54, 386-398 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.12.002

[R3] Williams, F. 2018. Digital Connectivity. In Reuschke, D. and M. Domecka. Policy Brief on Home-Based Businesses, OECD SME and Entrepreneurship Papers, No. 11, OECD Publishing, Paris. pp. 28-30 http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/abfe755f-en

[R4] Philip, L., Williams, F. 2019. Remote rural home-based businesses and digital inequalities: Understanding needs and expectations in a digitally underserved community. Journal of Rural Studies 68, 306-318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.09.011

[R5] Philip, L., Williams, F. 2019. Healthy Ageing in Smart Villages? Observations from the Field. European Countryside 11, 616-633 https://doi.org/10.2478/euco-2019-0034

Additional funding: internal University of Chester QR grants totalling £3,500 (2016-19); and some facilitation of activity (2018-19) through the ERDF funded Centre for Environment Science and Technology (CREST@UCS).

4. Details of the impact

This project contributes to address wider global concerns surrounding rural disadvantage in relation to digital connectivity. Direct beneficiary groups of the underpinning research and associated dissemination activities include: a) project participants – connected households and businesses (attitudinal change and capacity-building, leading to social and economic wellbeing); b) the wider rural resident and business community in Shropshire who benefitted from market stimulus (for improved connectivity); and c) the policy community in receipt of evidence-based contributions to the policy process.

1. Direct impact on project participants

The study had direct and significant social and economic impacts on the eight households / six micro-businesses (17 permanent users and four occasional users) who were provided with broadband access and the facilitation of its use.

  • The positive economic benefits of internet connectivity to the micro-businesses are illustrated by a couple who said that “…access to a paid broadband service that meets our requirements […] it’s revolutionised the way we do things. Specific efficiency and cost-saving examples include those relating to internet banking and ‘digital by default’ administrative functions, saving approximately £300 p.a. on birth notifications (of pedigree sheep) alone. Specific productivity gains attributable to online marketing and promotion in 2020 are reported to include new customer purchases totalling £3,200 [S1i]. The financial impact reported by this participating micro-business exceeds that estimated in an independent Department for Digital, Culture, Media & and Sport (DCMS) Evaluation of the Economic Impact and Public Value of Superfast Broadband (2018), which said “that subsidised coverage raised the turnover per worker of firms by 0.38 percent […], equivalent to £1,390 in GVA per firm per annum (p.6) [S1ii].

  • Behaviour change is evident. The project facilitated upskilling in the digital literacy of participants through broadband access and device use. All participants, including older generation households, remained online, transitioning to a paid alternative internet service. Broadband use has become part of the household norm, increasing (subjective) personal wellbeing through browsing, internet shopping, and staying in touch [S2i]. An older generation beneficiary provides examples of how internet access and use can overcome feelings of isolation, particularly through video-calling family members: “We speak every day and it makes such a difference to ‘see’ each other – it lifts both of us” [S2ii]. Some evaluations quantify the wellbeing uplift associated with a subsidised upgrade. For instance, an Ipsos Mori report for DCMS (2018) equates this as “… equivalent to £222.25 per year for the average premise” (Subjective wellbeing analysis of the Superfast Broadband programme, Annex C p.4) [S2iii].

1. Local-scale impact on the wider resident and business community in rural Shropshire

The provision of free, rate-limited broadband to local households enabled participants to overcome barriers of access and literacy that had previously excluded them from digital engagement. Through demonstrating opportunity, and potential to overcome barriers, the study created an appetite for better broadband, and stimulated the market. During the initial project phase, the study area in south-west Shropshire (SY7 8 postcode area) was not part of a Broadband Development UK (BDUK) phased ‘intervention area’ to improve access to fixed-line broadband. However, at the end of the study, residents and businesses in this location were eligible for the Better Broadband Scheme (2015-19), which subsidised the installation and access costs of alternative broadband provision. Williams stimulated uptake of the voucher scheme in this area, with the commercial provider Secure Web Services (SWS) being the main beneficiary, as evidenced by Connecting Shropshire and SWS data [S3]. The free Rural PAWS provision ceased in July 2016 (nine months after the dot.rural PAWS project end) and supported by Williams, project participants then secured alternative broadband provision [S1, S2]. Wider awareness of the Better Broadband Scheme support subsidy, and the services offered by SWS, was generated through word-of-mouth recommendation [S3iii].

  • 156 voucher applications were processed by Connecting Shropshire for the SY7 postcode area in the 12-month period August 2016-July 2017, 44 of which were coded to the SY7 8 postcode (study) area [S3i].

  • Of the SY7 8 postcode applications, three-quarters (n=33) of the subsidised broadband connections were installed by the commercial provider SWS in the post-PAWS 12-month period August 2016-July 2017 [S3ii].

1. Evidence-based contributions to national policy

Since 2016, Williams has disseminated the work via nine international conference / research meeting presentations and two invited Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) seminars [R3, R4]. Dissemination, and corresponding publishing activity, has underpinned a number of evidence-based policy contributions, the recommendations of which have recognised the barriers to digital inclusion, and called for the improvement of digital services to remote rural areas. The contribution and corresponding impact of Williams’s research can be evidenced as follows:

  • At an international scale, Williams provided evidence for the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD, which comprises 35 countries worldwide) in their Policy Brief for Home Based Business [R3]. The research was used as a case study (referenced at p30), with the OECD report identifying ‘digital connectivity’, the provision of fast, affordable broadband, as ‘crucial’ if the diverse home-based business sector is to participate and thrive.

  • Williams provided an expert interview for the Public Health Wales NHS Trust and Mental Health Foundation (2019) report, ‘Supporting farming communities at times of uncertainty – An action framework’, with a notable contribution to Key challenge 3: Regulation, administration and digitalisation. Recommended actions identified for prevention and protection, include “…the provision of fast internet connectivity, especially in rural areas, alongside addressing gaps in digital skills and literacy” (p14) [S4].

  • The research contributed to the House of Commons Select Committee (2019) update to the Broadband and digital-only services inquiry (2015), via written evidence provided by Williams’s co-author Dr Lorna Philip [S5i] and referenced at paragraphs 22 and 25 in the House of Commons report (published 18 September 2019) [S5ii]. The 2019 update recommends that “the Government honour its commitment to its ‘outside-in’ approach to ensure hard to reach rural areas are prioritised” (paragraph 67); “Any new digital public service platforms should be trialled and assessed by rural stakeholders prior to roll out to ensure they are user friendly” (paragraph 31); and that “the Government commit to an immediate review of the USO [Universal Service Obligation of 10 Mbps] as soon as possible to ensure it is suitably ambitious for rural areas” (paragraph 47) so the USO is not obsolete soon after introduction.

  • Expert witness Professor Claire Wallace (University of Aberdeen) provided oral evidence [S6i] to the House of Lords Select Committee on the Rural Economy (2018). Drawing on Williams’s research findings [R1, R2], the evidence was referenced in the Select Committee report (published 27 April 2019) ‘Time for a strategy for the rural economy’ (chapter 4 of Digital connectivity, paragraphs 242 and 243) [S6ii]. Related conclusions contributed to the House of Commons Select Committee 2019 update and recommendations (above, [S5ii]) including: upload and download speeds were too modest in the USO commitment; and local and national governments must do more to realise the potential of improving digital skills in rural areas.

5. Sources to corroborate the impact

[S1] (i) Testimonial from a business partner, dated November 2020. (ii) Figures obtained from an Independent report by Ipsos Mori for DCMS evaluating the economic impacts and public value of the Superfast Broadband Programme (2018) (Superfast Integrated Report p.6): https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/evaluation-of-the-economic-impact-and-public-value-of-the-superfast-broadband-programme

[S2] (i) Testimonial from a community resident, dated November 2020. (ii) Testimonial from a retired farmer, dated November 2020. (iii) Figures obtained from an Independent report by Ipsos Mori for DCMS evaluating the economic impacts and public value of the Superfast Broadband Programme (2018) (Superfast Integrated Report, p.7 and Annex C – Executive Summary, p.4): https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/evaluation-of-the-economic-impact-and-public-value-of-the-superfast-broadband-programme

[S3] (i) Testimonial (Annex 1) and voucher scheme data obtained (June 2020). Point of contact, Connecting Shropshire Programme Manager, Shropshire Council:

Timescale Postcode Applications Codes issued
Dec 2015 – July 2016 SY7 46 45
Aug 2016 – July 2017 SY7 156 152
Timescale Postcode Applications Codes issued
Dec 2015 – July 2016 SY7 8 21 21
Aug 2016 – July 2017 SY7 8 44 44

(ii) SWS installations data obtained June 2020. Point of contact, Managing Director, SWS Broadband:

Timescale Postcode Applications Codes issued SWS Installations
Dec 2015 – July 2016 SY7 46 45 18
Aug 2016 – July 2017 SY7 156 152 72
Timescale Postcode Applications Codes issued SWS Installations
Dec 2015 – July 2016 SY7 8 21 21 10
Aug 2016 – July 2017 SY7 8 44 44 33

(iii) Testimonial from a community resident and customer, November 2020.

[S4] Davies AR, Homolova L, Grey CNB, Fisher J, Burchett N, Kousoulis A (2019). Supporting farming communities at times of uncertainty: an action framework to support the mental health and well-being of farmers and their families. Cardiff: Public Health Wales NHS Trust & Mental Health Foundation (see inside cover and pp.13-14):

https://www.mentalhealth.org.uk/sites/default/files/Supporting-farming-communities-at-times-of-uncertainty.pdf

[S5] (i) Written evidence to Commons Select Committee Rural Broadband Inquiry Update (2019) University of Aberdeen (RBD0016)

http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/environment-food-and-rural-affairs-committee/rural-broadband-and-digital-only-services/written/103213.html

(ii) House of Commons Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee, An Update on Rural Connectivity (2019). Evidence in Section 3 Digital Public Services in Rural Areas (Paragraphs 22, 25) and outcomes in Conclusions and recommendations (Paragraphs 31, 47, 67).

https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmenvfru/2223/222302.htm

[S6] (i) Oral witness evidence provided to the House of Lords Select Committee on the Rural Economy, University of Aberdeen (published research identifiable: Q174, Q177, Q178, Q183).

http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/rural-economy-committee/rural-economy/oral/92944.html

(ii) House of Lords Select Committee, Time for a strategy for the rural economy’ 2019 (Evidence in Chapter 4 Digital connectivity, Paragraphs 242, 243) and outcomes in Summary of conclusions and recommendations (Paragraphs 278, 304).

Showing impact case studies 1 to 2 of 2

Filter by higher education institution

UK regions
Select one or more of the following higher education institutions and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No higher education institutions found.
Institutions

Filter by unit of assessment

Main panels
Select one or more of the following units of assessment and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No unit of assessments found.
Units of assessment

Filter by continued case study

Select one or more of the following states and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.

Filter by summary impact type

Select one or more of the following summary impact types and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.

Filter by impact UK location

UK Countries
Select one or more of the following UK locations and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No UK locations found.
Impact UK locations

Filter by impact global location

Continents
Select one or more of the following global locations and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No global locations found.
Impact global locations

Filter by underpinning research subject

Subject areas
Select one or more of the following underpinning research subjects and then click Apply selected filters when you have finished.
No subjects found.
Underpinning research subjects