Impact case study database
Search and filter
Filter by
- Birmingham City University
- 17 - Business and Management Studies
- Submitting institution
- Birmingham City University
- Unit of assessment
- 17 - Business and Management Studies
- Summary impact type
- Societal
- Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
- No
1. Summary of the impact
Multi-unit leaders (or area managers), who work in service chains, directly impact organisational growth. The research of the Business School has provided the intellectual backbone through which successive cohorts of area managers have been developed. Dissemination enabled over 800 multi-site managers, in 22 organisations, to use research results, models and frameworks, to enhance their practice, progression and performance. When surveyed, 94% agreed the programme improved their impact and performance, with 97% agreeing that AMUL research was integral to this success. Testimonials from service chain business leaders confirmed multiple qualitative and quantitative impacts on their organisations’ culture, sales and growth.
2. Underpinning research
The AMUL has drawn on the research expertise of three academics who have delivered the Multi-Unit Leadership (MUL) Programme. Edger, who is lead of AMUL, instigated this research (R1), with a comprehensive study of area management practice in 21 service chain organisations (including Sainsbury’s, Lloyds Bank, Rank, Greggs, Mitchells and Butlers, and Greene King). This used a mixed-methods approach (including qualitative case study, and secondary quantitative survey data), to establish what constituted high performance multi-unit leader impacts on service chain growth. The outcome was an ‘Effective MUL Model’, which provided (a hitherto lacking) framework for outstanding area management practice. The underlying typology highlighted how three key activities (service-led sales, systems implementation, and standards enforcement) were driven through three dominant behavioural practices (commitment, control and change), underpinned by three critical personal characteristics (emotional intelligence, expertise and energy). Central to this model was the notion of Portfolio Optimisation through Social Exchange (POSE). This established that upper quartile operators consistently outperformed their peers by reducing geographical and psychological distance between themselves and their followers. This was achieved through outstanding local leadership practice. The ‘Effective MUL Model’, and its attendant notions of POSE and local leadership, helped participants to extend their practice, beyond ‘managerialism’, accelerating their development into high performance multi-unit leaders.
Further research by Edger (R2) has elaborated on this, and explored franchising as a specific form of multi-unit operation. This was based on an examination of 19 case studies, exclusively concentrating on service-based franchise-chain leadership.
This MUL content has been enhanced by the research of Lichtenstein. Initial work explored emotional intelligence (see also R1) and the relationship between executive decision-making and personal values. This has been delivered to AMUL cohorts, focussing on how personal values — the framework of beliefs that guide one’s actions — influence decision-making at work (R3). Using mixed-methods and focus groups, this work demonstrated the efficacy of a behavioural strategy approach, and offered support for Maslow’s motivational theory, which is a foundational model in the AMUL programmes. This analysis was extended (R4) to consider multi-unit leadership in public sector organisations, exploring the usefulness of strategic planning in the UK police force. This work offered a deeper understanding of the planning-performance relationship in a more “formal” multi-unit context.
The research of Psychogios (R5, R6) has also been a strand in the leadership CPD offered by the AMUL. Psychogios’s research, based on in-depth qualitative investigation in various companies, suggests that managers are frequently reluctant to use formal mechanisms to provide constructive feedback about, for example, changing existing processes. Instead, they prefer informal methods of feedback that work better in enhancing the achievements of targets, as well as in organisational change. More specifically, two features of feedback are proposed as enhancing this process: benefits-oriented (performance) and confidence-oriented (motivation). As such, Psychogios proposes a three-fold form of feedback through which managers in multi-unit organisations, and more generally, can expand their perspectives of feedback from feeding-back to feeding-forward, thereby enhancing the confidence of employees and their resilience in dealing with turbulence.
The strength of this collective body of work lies in its emergent frameworks, which area managers, and managers in general, can use to enhance their multi-site leadership performance. Edger’s monographs are recognised by practitioners (see S10 below), with R1 being republished by Routledge (a leading international academic publisher). R2 was shortlisted by the Chartered Management Institute/British Library for their 2016 Management Book of the Year Award. R3 was published in a journal considered “internationally excellent” by the Chartered Association of Business Schools Academic Journal Guide, and R4 and R6 are in journals recognised internationally by the Guide. Finally, R5 was a refereed conference paper at the world’s most prestigious management conference.
3. References to the research
R1. Edger, C. 2012. Effective Multi-Unit Leadership: Local Leadership in Multi-Site Situations. Farnham: Gower (reprinted in 2016 by Routledge. ISBN 978-1138257788).
R2. Edger, C. and Emmerson, A. 2015. Franchising – How Both Sides can Win. Oxford: Libri. ISBN: 9781909818606
R3. Lichtenstein, S., Lichtenstein, G., and Higgs, M. 2017. Personal values at work: A mixed-methods study of executives’ strategic decision-making. Journal of General management 43 (1), pp.15-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306307017719702
R4. Elliott, G., Day, M., and Lichtenstein, S. 2019 Strategic planning activity, middle manager divergent thinking, external stakeholder salience, and organizational performance: a study of English and Welsh police forces, Public Management Review
https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1635194
R5. Psychogios, A., Antonacopoulou, A., Nyfoudi, M, Blackori, F. and Szamosi, T. L. 2018. How does feedback matter for the sustainability of organizational routines? Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, August, Chicago, Illinois, US (Conference Proceedings – Paper 16801). https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2018.16801abstract
R6. Psychogios, A., Blakcori, F., Szamosi, L. and O’Regan, N. 2019. From feeding-back to feeding-forward: managerial feedback as a trigger of change in SMEs. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 26 (1), pp.18-42. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-01-2018-0034
4. Details of the impact
AMUL research has informed, and was disseminated through, a suite of postgraduate programmes. Since its inception, the programmes have been delivered to over 800 delegates, and 22 UK organisations, including the following.
Four of the leading pub-restaurant chains in the UK: Stonegate Group (S01); Greene King (S02); Mitchells and Butlers ; and, Marstons.
The UK’s largest hotel chain, Premier Inn.
Builders’ merchants, including the UK’s largest, St Gobain (S03), and cohorts through the Builders Merchant Federation (S04).
The UK’s largest land-based leisure gaming company, Rank Plc (S05).
Other fast growing SMEs (including Oakman Inns S06).
Impacts from the cohorts which studied prior to 2014 are still being felt. Indicating the commercial sector’s confidence in the significance of this work, and willingness to pay accordingly, the programme generated income of £775,500 to the Business School over the REF period. Moreover, many clients had commissioned successive cohorts 2014-2020, thereby demonstrating the ongoing value that these companies attached to the unique content of the programmes.
4.1. Managerial Impacts
There are various AMUL models, which have impacted managerial practice. Most significantly, the conceptual ‘Effective MUL Model’ was formulated while researching at the outset of the programme, and published shortly thereafter (R01). It provides an overarching framework for participants in the programmes to enhance their practice and performance within industry (evidenced in 4.2 below). In a 2020 survey of participants (S07):
97% of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that AMUL’s research was integral to the success of the AMUL programme; and,
94% of respondents acknowledged that their day-to-day management practice, as middle managers, continued to be informed by the knowledge and understanding gained from this research.
Respondents also pointed to the support this framework provided in responding to the COVID-19 pandemic, benefitting them with the structure it provided. Significantly, 94% of respondents confirmed that their business impact and personal performance had improved as a result of participating in the research-informed AMUL programme (S07). Also, 85% of respondents agreed that attending the programme had enhanced their chances for progression. 57% confirmed that they had been promoted in this REF period, with 93% agreeing that the programme gave them greater levels of aspiration.
Other frameworks were used to good effect by organisations. For example, the three-fold-feedback framework has been adopted by 11 organisations, and 89% reported they used three-fold feedback often. All respondents stated that managers’ feedback had improved, with 77% reporting feedback had improved very much, or considerably ( S08, S09). This attests to the AMUL impacts on management practice.
4.2. Organisational and Sector Impacts
Written testimonials from the service chain clients of the MUL Programme — who commissioned a succession of multi-site manager cohorts from 2014-20 — also support its growth impact on their organisations.
The CEO of Stonegate (S01) stated that, from 2015-2020, the MUL Programme had ‘substantially strengthened the operational middle’ of the organisation (decreasing area manager turnover from 40%, to single figures). It had assisted their £69M to £145M EBITDA growth (growth in earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization), which is a 15% compound annual growth rate. This placed Stonegate in a strong position for its subsequent £1.25Bn takeover of the Ei Group, making it the largest pub company in the UK.
The MD of Greene King stated that the Multi-Unit Programmes supported its ‘vital multi-site cohorts’. This enabled his company to outperform their ‘competitive set by up to 2% in like-for-like sales over the period’, adding that ‘without exception, I saw the individuals grow in both expertise and confidence, thinking and acting more strategically’ (S02). The CEO of St Gobain (S04) stated that the programmes had contributed to their ‘relative industry outperformance’ over the duration, with its Head of People Development and Career Management stating that the courses’ impact extended beyond developing staff, to ‘addressing issues vital for the company’, such as digitalisation (S03). In addition, the Chairman of the BMF stated that the programme ‘accelerated the growth ambitions’ of its member firms (S04).
The Chairman of Rank stated that the research-informed post-graduate programmes ensured ‘that we continued to outstrip the competition’ (S05). Also, the Operations Director of Oakman Inns maintained that the MUL Programme ‘greatly assisted the organisation’s growth from 8 to 24 units’ over the period 2015-2020. Furthermore, he added: ‘in my view the MUL Programme has been pivotal in increasing the ‘smarts’ of our multi-site leadership in Oakman Inns … It is the only programme in the UK that is focused on improving the capability and performance of multi-site operators — something that has had a very positive effect on the financial and unit growth of Oakman over the past five years’ (S06).
At a sectoral level, the Founder and MD of Propel, which organises the London Multi-site Leader Masterclasses (attended by hundreds of leisure executives), has attested that the books and industry-related articles produced by AMUL have ‘provided thought leadership at all levels of the (leisure) sector’ and its programmes have had a ‘ripple effect’ as many of the area managers ‘who have graduated from the courses … gravitate to the senior echelons of the UK food and beverage sector’ (S10). This overarching testimonial demonstrates the profound impact from the Academy for MUL on the sector, triangulating the evidence of research impact from participants and senior executives.
5. Sources to corroborate the impact
S01 Stonegate Group Corroboration
Testimonial from CEO, Stonegate Group [Named Corroborator 001]
S02 Greene King PLC Corroboration
Testimonial from MD, Greene King Plc
S03 St Gobain and BMF Corroboration
Testimonial from CEO, St Gobain and Chairman, British Merchants Federation [Named Corroborator 002]
S04 St Gobain Corroboration
Testimonial from Head of People Development and Career Management, St Gobain
S05 Rank Plc Corroboration
Testimonial from CEO and Chairman, Rank Plc [Named Corroborator 003]
S06 Oakman Inns Corroboration
Testimonial from Operations Director, Oakman Inns [Named Corroborator 004]
S07 AMUL Participant Survey
Multi-Unit Leadership Programme Participants: A Follow-on Survey, 2020
S08 AMUL Company Survey
Applications of Three-Fold Feedback: A Company Survey, 2020
S9 European Business Association Corroboration
Testimonial from Deputy Director, Corporate Development, European Business Association
S10 Propel Corroboration
Testimonial from Founder and MD, Propel (ranked by Allegra Strategy as the 2nd most influential person in UK Hospitality) [Named Corroborator 005]
- Submitting institution
- Birmingham City University
- Unit of assessment
- 17 - Business and Management Studies
- Summary impact type
- Societal
- Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
- No
1. Summary of the impact
Birmingham City University has had a profound impact on SME growth. Key to this has been its PSP diagnostic, which has been the basis for 630 practical SME interventions in the UK (predominantly in the West Midlands), 396 interventions in Canada, and 351 interventions in Indonesia. Working with national and local governments, and NGOs, PSP has provided direct support to firms, with dissemination in workshops, one-to-one interventions, and a diagnostic report. It has been used in four funded West Midlands projects, and one of those alone is estimated to have created £2.5M GVA and 118 jobs in the regional economy.
2. Underpinning research
Researchers in the Business School’s Centre for Enterprise, Innovation and Growth (CEIG) have been undertaking applied research on SMEs that has enhanced our understanding of business practices linked to firm growth. Through its research, CEIG has built and extended a set of tools with the specific objective of connecting business research and practice. Key to this has been the development and application of the PSP diagnostic (R1), and this innovation makes three contributions: (1) it incorporates a model of SME growth which examines firm objectives; (2) it models SME context and environment in the growth model; (3) the diagnostic provides metrics which guide the SME in their strategic decision-making, simultaneously providing the researchers with data to enhance the dataset. This final element is achieved through a personalised growth report, the framework for which was developed by CEIG researchers.
The PSP is a longitudinal project (involving the addition of observations though time), in collaboration with colleagues from Mount Royal University, Canada, and the Institute of Technology Bandung, Indonesia (R2). The research team have developed a framework that supports firms in understanding their business context, which is then used to assess their comparative performance in a variety of country-settings. Drawing on previous research (R3, R4), this cross-cultural understanding has been used to support the extension of the diagnostic to the Indonesian case. Research had found that there were patterns related to particular geographical and industry settings, which were incorporated into the model.
There are also internal factors, such as HRM practices and use of high-performance work systems, which shape firms’ growth trajectory, and are incorporated into the diagnostic (R2, R5). Connections, too, are important, and it is necessary to interpret growth in terms of network-based capacity (R6). Knowledge transfer aims to address the gap between research and business practice, and help develop university “triple helix” offers (i.e. the set of interactions between academia, industry and government). These have been limited as academia-business interactions can be inefficient, with capacity constraints on academic time. To address this, CEIG developed an enhanced diagnostic method (reported in R1) through which the data collection process provides a real-time analysis. That is, the diagnostic produces results immediately on submission of the data, thereby providing timely feedback for SMEs, and incorporation of further observations into the research dataset.
Research outputs which underpin the research are all published in journals which are at least “internationally recognised” by the Chartered Association of Business Schools Academic Journal Guide (CABS AJG). R6 is in an “internationally excellent” journal, and R2 is in a journal considered world leading. Local government bodies and industry associations have promoted the use of the PSP diagnostic because of its benefits, and in a 2020 assessment, it was awarded an “exemplar” by the CABS Small Business Charter.
3. References to the research
R1. Gilman M, & Salder J. (2020) 'The role of diagnostics as a means of engaged scholarship and enhancing SME research'. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, online, https://doi.org/10.1177/1465750320969614
R2. Gilman, M., Raby, S. and Pyman, A. (2015) The contours of employee voice in SMEs: the importance of context. Human Resource Management Journal, 25(4), pp.563-579,
R3. Hussain, J and Millman, C. (2014) The role of guanxi networks in the performance of women-led firms in China. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 6(1), pp.66-82, https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJGE\-03\-2013\-0014/full/html
R4. Shah, S., El-Gohary, H., and Hussain, J. (2015) An Investigation of Market Orientation (MO) and Tourism Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises’ (SMEs) Performance in Developing Countries. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing, 32(8), pp.990-1022, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10548408.2014.957372
R5. Stoian, C. and Gilman, M. (2017) Corporate social responsibility that “pays”: A strategic approach to CSR for SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management, 55(1), pp.5-31,
R6. Chau, V.S., Gilman, M. and Serbanica, C. (2017) Aligning university-industry interactions: The role of boundary spanning in intellectual capital transfer. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, pp.199-209, http://www.open-access.bcu.ac.uk/601/
The funding for the knowledge exchange using the PSP diagnostic came from a number of European Union sources. Specifically:
European Union (ERDF), Innovation Vouchers programme (1 and 2), 2016-2019. The value of the project was £534,848, with a value to the University of £262,749.
European Union (ERDF), Enterprise for Success, 2016-2022. The value of the project is £915,000, with the value to the Business School £206,171 (with partners Greater Birmingham and Solihull Local Enterprise Partnership (GBSLEP) and the Growth Hub).
European Union (ERDF), Innovation Vouchers 3 programme, 2019-2022. The value of the project is £1,606,542, with the CEIG scheduled to receive £178,588 in funding.
European Union (ERDF), Growing You, 2016-2019. The value of the project was £2M, and the value to BCU was £360,962 (with partners GBSLEP, the Growth Hub, Greater Birmingham Chamber of Commerce, Aston University, and Library of Birmingham).
4. Details of the impact
Research and ERDF funded interventions have provided SMEs with knowledge and support that improves growth performance. It has had substantial impact in the West Midlands, and the PSP model has been applied in the Alberta District and Calgary (Canada), with 396 SMEs participating ( S01, S02). In Indonesia, we have worked closely with the Institute of Technology Bandung and a Government Ministry to carry out PSP and SME interventions in five regions of the country, involving 351 SMEs ( S03). In the West Midlands, interventions were delivered in partnership with a number of partners identified in section 3.
4.1. Innovation Vouchers and Workshops
The Innovation Vouchers programme offer vouchers and workshops to help SMEs develop new processes and systems to improve efficiency and introduce new products and services. Within this programme, we have engaged with 339 SMEs, targeting improvements in the quality of their products and services. In the initial phases, between 2016 to 2019, 270 SMEs were assisted. In Innovation Vouchers 3, since June 2019, a further 69 businesses were supported, including through the COVID-19 Pandemic. This phase is scheduled to run to June 2022. The workshops use the individual reports and data from the PSP diagnostic to support SMEs, and 63% of participating respondents considered that they had improved the management of innovation within their business as a direct result of attending the workshops. SMEs reported that the most significant impacts were ‘improvements to the quality of products or services’ (reported by 93% of respondents).
The impacts of the first two phases of the whole programme were independently assessed, in May 2019, by Regeneration Action Ltd, in partnership with Research by Design (S04). The independent report was commissioned by Aston University, to undertake a summative assessment of the Innovation Vouchers project (phases 1 and 2). This was guided by a standard set of research questions contained within the summative assessment guidance, issued by the Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government. The report summarised the outcomes and impacts, for the project as a whole (including partners), as:
Total GVA to the time of the summative assessment plus the GVA expected over the next 3 years was likely to be £14.9 million. This included £0.9 million at the time of the summative assessment and a further £14 million within 3 years.
Gross jobs created estimated to be 532 over the next 3 years, with 114 created at the time of the summative assessment (in May 2019).
If GVA is split proportionately between this REF period and the next (since it spans the two), we can attribute an £8.2M contribution to GVA from the project up to December 2020.
The report also provides independent estimates (S04) of the specific impact of the Business School’s CEIG diagnostic and workshops. These are:
£4.6 million GVA, with £0.3 million generated by the time of the summative assessment (May 2019), and a further £4.3 million expected within three years.
214 new jobs to be created as a direct result of the workshops. This includes 22.5 before the summative assessment, and a further 150 after three years.
If the economic contribution is split proportionately between this REF period and the next (since it spans the two), we can estimate our Innovation Vouchers impact to be a £2.5M contribution to GVA, with 118 jobs created as a result of our work, up to December 2020.
4.2. Enterprise for Success
Enterprise for Success is an ERDF programme delivered with local partners including local authorities across the GBSLEP (S05) and the regional Growth Hub (S05). Its aim is to enhance the leadership capabilities and marketing skills of local SMEs through providing them with business intelligence to inform decision-making. Participating SMEs complete the PSP diagnostic, and targeted interventions were identified by the team on this basis, with support including a workshop series and one-to-one assists. To date, 152 SMEs have been supported through the programme. Programme participants have attested to its value:
“The process was very beneficial; to have someone with an objective point of view helping work your way through the strategy proved priceless” (Managing Director, Pregnancy Bump Box)
“(the strategy was) a lifesaver. We now have a true framework that can steer us over the next 5 years, creating a road map for success: I no longer feel overwhelmed” (Managing Director, The Business Support Organisation)
Participants have talked about how the changes have assisted them to make the move from ‘busy fools’ to ‘strategic leaders’, taking their business to another level.
Formal evaluation of Enterprise for Success was delayed due to COVID-19, but if the GVA and employment effects are similar to those estimated independently from our Innovation Vouchers intervention (with 270 businesses), we could expect substantial impact from the 152 SMEs participating in Enterprise for Success. Variants on the Enterprise for Success model are presently being delivered in Canada (S01), with 396 SMEs participating in Alberta and Calgary. There is also support, at the ministerial level, for the series of workshops and diagnostics that have been delivered in Indonesia, with 351 SMEs participating in 2019-20 (S03). As observed by a Deputy Government Minister (S03):
“This collaboration … will improve the welfare of thousands of enterprises that aim to grow and develop their performance, leading to employment and economic benefits” (Deputy Minister, Ministry of Cooperatives and Small and Medium Enterprises, Republic of Indonesia)
4.3. Growing You
This programme delivered a locally focused and unique business support programme, helping entrepreneurs from the BAME SME community to find ways to overcome barriers to firm growth, and supporting them to develop their business towards sustainable success. In total, 139 SMEs from Birmingham accessed this programme and benefitted as following:
“Well over 100 SMEs from Birmingham accessed this programme and benefitted from the data and insight provided by the PSP diagnostic. Upon completion of the programme, each business was assigned a personal mentor by BCU, to guide and advise along the way, thus making it a truly sustainable initiative” (Growth Hub Operations Manager, Chamber of Commerce, S06)
4.4. Stakeholder Engagement
Birmingham City Council, Solihull Borough Council (S07), Sandwell Council, GBSLEP (S05), Growth Hub (S05), Greater Birmingham Chambers of Commerce (S06), and the Black Country Chambers of Commerce have all engaged CEIG to work with them on the design and delivery of these programmes. Others, such as the Federation of Small Businesses (S08), and the Manufacturing Training Centre , have engaged with PSP, and endorsed it to provide support to their members.
“[the] diagnostic and research have been important in forming our own Growth Hub processes, helping us to identify growth businesses quickly and enabling them to get advice and guidance in a timely and effective manner” (Growth Hub Manager, GBSLEP, S05).
5. Sources to corroborate the impact
S01 Canadian Regional Authority
Testimonial from Director, Logistics and Industrial Policy, Canadian Regional Authority
S02 Mount Royal University
Testimonial from Director, Institute for Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Mount Royal University, Canada
S03 Institut Teknologi Bandung/Indonesian Ministry
Testimonial from Dean, School of Business and Management, ITB/Indonesian Ministry
S04 Innovation Voucher Evaluation
‘Innovation Vouchers Project Summative Assessment’ report (May 2019)
S05 Greater Birmingham and Solihull Local Enterprise Partnership, Letter from Regional Growth Hub
Testimonial from GBSLEP and Regional Growth Hub [Named Corroborator 001]
S06 Chambers of Commerce
Testimonial from Growth Hub Operations Manager, Chambers of Commerce
S07 Solihull Borough Council
Testimonial from GBSLEP Enterprise Programme Coordinator Economy & Infrastructure Directorate, Solihull Borough Council
S08 Federation of Small Businesses
Testimonial from Development Manager for Staffordshire and West Midlands, Federation of Small Businesses
- Submitting institution
- Birmingham City University
- Unit of assessment
- 17 - Business and Management Studies
- Summary impact type
- Societal
- Is this case study continued from a case study submitted in 2014?
- No
1. Summary of the impact
BCU’s Entrepreneurship Education research focuses on customisation to ‘context’. Contexts considered include discipline, space and culture, and setting. Our research has shaped institutional policies, practice and pedagogy. Its beneficiaries include: (i) social entrepreneurship educators who adopted a BCU framework across Europe, establishing new communities of practice; (ii) entrepreneurs (particularly women) and lending-institutions in the UK, Ghana and Pakistan, who benefitted from enhanced financial literacy; (iii) 1260 new start-up businesses in Africa, whose educators had adopted our approach; (iv) long-term unemployed women tenants, whose national housing association had transformed their approach to employability support to include entrepreneurial self-employment.
2. Underpinning research
The Business School has longstanding expertise in Entrepreneurship Education (EE), with original research highlighting a range of opportunities for contextualised and experiential education (R1). In particular, our contributions have demonstrated the need to adapt EE to the contexts of ‘subject discipline’, ‘space and culture’ and ‘setting’.
Researchers deployed a mixed-methods approach, involving comparative analysis of academic job adverts (across disciplines), educator surveys and entrepreneur interviews, to identify the perception of EE needs in different subject ‘disciplines’. EE must be tailored to industry-specific, entrepreneurial needs, in order to generate value for beneficiaries (R1, R2). Our results confirmed the locus of practice in EE, particularly: (i) the importance of entrepreneurial role models; (ii) the benefits of recent industry-specific entrepreneurial experiences of educators; and, (iii) the benefits of live projects, e.g. working on assessments and scenarios set by real companies, reflecting genuine business problems. This research identified the advantages of adopting existing pedagogies from disciplines other than business, particularly art and design-based teaching practices, to support experiential learning and assessment (R1). Through an exploration of the careers of a cohort of creative graduates, R2 corroborated this. It highlighted a deficiency in explicit entrepreneurship education (e.g. entrepreneurship modules) but found that creative discipline pedagogies “led to implicit enterprise education and to the development of entrepreneurial traits” (e.g. opportunity-spotting and networking), due to the experiential nature of creative pedagogies.
Further BCU research identified the importance of incorporating motivations and strategies of prospective social entrepreneurs in the co-design of curricula (R3). Carey and Hill led the EE pathway for the Erasmus+ Business Education for Sustainability project (see below). This work demonstrated the need for contextualised EE in the ‘discipline’ of social enterprise. This was particularly so for EE that acknowledged the motivation/orientation of nascent social entrepreneurs and specifically the challenges faced by social enterprises, e.g. when working with volunteers, including issues related to HRM, governance and accounting.
Our research has also included analysis of business support intermediaries in the UK, Ghana and Pakistan. We identified the EE needs of entrepreneurs within specific ‘space and cultural’ contexts. For example, R4 demonstrated the link between financial literacy and access to finance. Using a mixed-methods approach, researchers found that financial literacy is an interconnecting resource that mitigates information asymmetry and collateral deficit when evaluating loan applications. This was applied to the specific experience of women entrepreneurs, focussing on microfinance in the UK, Ghana and Pakistan. BCU researchers found contradictory impacts for women entrepreneurs accessing microfinance in Ghana. While access to microfinance was empowering, it frequently destabilised family dynamics, with repercussions for loan default. Researchers recommended that the family as a whole should be mentored to take collective ownership and joint decisions in the business, before the credit facility is approved (R5).
Further research, using a longitudinal and participatory approach, focussed on the context of teaching entrepreneurship outside of formal, institutionalised education ‘settings’. This work was carried out in the UK, in collaboration with ASHRAM Accord, a national housing association. The work centred on developing entrepreneurial capacity amongst long-term, unemployed, female housing tenants. We found that while entrepreneurial intent was strong (particularly for lifestyle and micro-business orientation), there were practical barriers in terms of self-efficacy/confidence, issues of intersectionality in terms of the participants experiencing multiple forms of discrimination, and reliance on (and fear associated with) the benefits system. These represented blocks to participation. The research developed a roadmap for a “pre-entrepreneurship education” phase for tenants to be EE ready (R6).
Regarding the quality of this body of work, R1 has been cited 83 times, including by notable international scholars within the EE field. Papers R2, R4, and R5 are in journals which are internationally recognised by the Chartered Association of Business School’s Academic Journal Guide (2018). Dr Simon Brown (Head of Enterprise Development at the National Centre for Entrepreneurship in Education, 2011-2017) described R3 as “an indispensable addition to anybody’s library that is involved with enterprise or enterprise education” (see back cover). Finally, R6 was ‘highly commended’ at the Institute for Small Business and Entrepreneurship Conference (2019), in both the Gender and Enterprise track, and the conference-wide ‘Knowledge Transfer’ category.
3. References to the research
R1. Carey, C. and Matlay, H. (2010) Creative disciplines education: a model for assessing ideas in entrepreneurship education? Education + Training, Vol. 52 No. 8/9, pp. 694-709 https://doi.org/10.1108/00400911011088999
R2. Carey, C. 2015. The careers of fine artists and the embedded creative. Journal of Education and Work, 28:4, pp 407-421, https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2014.997686
R3. Hill, I. 2015. Start-Up: A Practice Based Guide For New Venture Creation. London: MacMillan. ISBN: 9781137425836. https://www.macmillanihe.com/page/detail/?k=9781137425836
R4. Hussain, J., Salia, S. and Karim, A. 2018. Is knowledge that powerful? Financial
literacy and access to finance: An analysis of enterprises in the UK. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 25 (6), pp. 985-1003. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-01-2018-0021
R5. Salia, S., Hussain, J., Tingbani, I. and Kolade, O. 2018. Is women empowerment a zero sum game? Unintended consequences of microfinance for women’s empowerment in Ghana. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research 24 (1), pp. 273-289. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-04-2017-0114
R6. Hussain, S. and Carey, C. 2019. Lived experiences of female social-housing residents: Stories examining entrepreneurship support needs, ISBE Conference Proceedings, Newcastle, UK. http://www.open-access.bcu.ac.uk/8608/
The research in this case study was supported by two Erasmus+ awards, and Carey was the Business School’s lead:
The African Higher Education Leadership in Advancing Inclusive Innovation project (AHEAD). The School received £52,735 and the total project value was €706,326.
The Business Education for Sustainability project (BEST). The School received £32,361 and the total project value was €375,202.
These projects were run in collaboration with a total of 14 countries, and over 20 partner institutions across Europe and Africa (for collaborators, see Section 4 of the REF5B).
4. Details of the impact
a. Enhancing international entrepreneurship education
BCU participated in the AHEAD project, 2017-2021. Our research changed the pedagogical approach to teaching entrepreneurship and social enterprise in 10 higher education institutions (HEIs) in Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania. Based on our research, we co-created entrepreneurship education teaching materials, which are accessible for all educators, and included: (i) case studies of good practice (available in English and Swahili); and, (ii) an extensive body of teaching materials (available in English and Swahili). This work and materials were disseminated at a conference and at a transnational ‘training the educator’ workshop, hosted by BCU, to 40 senior staff from these institutions. A follow-up survey (S01) asked participants to: “think about the time since that workshop … [and] indicate how your entrepreneurship education provision has developed as a consequence”. Responses were gathered 12 months after the dissemination event, and found that:
96% of workshop participants had adopted Design Thinking or Human-Centred Design approaches;
75% had adapted provision to suit their local context;
92% said that “opportunities to teach experientially had increased”.
In addition, following their lecturers’ participation in the Birmingham workshop, survey participants indicated that this had shaped EE which supported over 1260 new student/graduate business start-ups (S01). Our research helped shape the institutional policy of all of the participating institutions. For example, one respondent stated:
“The workshop has been very useful in the review of the curriculum at the institution. Entrepreneurship training is now part of every curriculum in the School of Business, where I am the Dean” (S01).
b. Materials for social enterprise educators in 8 HEIs across 6 EU countries
As part of the BEST project (2014-17), the School developed a novel set of learning materials that provided a framework for teaching entrepreneurship within the context of social enterprise (S02, S03). The project was developed in response to the problems following the economic crisis (particularly austerity), with social entrepreneurship and corporate social responsibility emerging as key policy priorities in the EU. It was recognised that “business and economics education and training does not adequately reflect this trend” (S05). The teaching materials developed sought to address this gap. These materials have been translated into six further languages, were available globally via the BEST project Moodle site, and adopted by HEIs in Bulgaria, Greece, Lithuania, Spain, Portugal, Turkey and the UK. Universities varied in size from 8000 to 20,000 students, and materials included:
A series of case studies (S04) which are accessible and used by educators throughout the EU (available online to anyone);
The creation of a six-chapter social enterprise curriculum (available in seven languages) focussing on entrepreneurship education within the context of social enterprise, climate change and sustainability.
c. Improving micro-finance opportunities for entrepreneurs in Ghana and Pakistan
Our work influenced microfinance institutions in a number of countries, leading to lending-policy change. For example, in Ghana, one SME lending institution changed as follows:
“from your findings … we have now made a policy change …especially, mechanisms have been put in place to involve husband and wife in the KYC [‘know your customer’ is a banking term] process … It has enabled a better understanding … reducing the number of delinquent loans” (S06).
This new policy focus on supporting and facilitating shared, household-ownership of decision making, as a result of BCU research, reduced risks associated with lending to women, while increasing their access to micro-finance. The research demonstrated the societal benefit of this in decreasing the possibility of family breakdown.
Acknowledging a similar need in Pakistan, BCU academics used research to co-design a programme of ‘train the educator’ workshops to support SMEs. Educators, in this context, are now better equipped to instruct learners and SMEs in how to gain access to finance, ensure sustainability of businesses, and maximise growth opportunities. This activity has so far resulted in the training of 87 SMEs leaders, 47% of whom reported increased turnover, with an estimated 236 jobs created as a result (S07).
d. Practice and financial literacy in the UK
Our research enabled Aston Reinvestment Trust Business Loans (ART) “to reposition our business in the light of the new Government start up loan programme … We have revised and better prepared our literature and website” (S08). This has assisted in informing potential applicants as to ‘what information is important’, helping guide entrepreneurs to provide key information then enables ART to more effectively evaluate business proposals. Its Chief Executive stated:
“research carried out by academics at BCU, with ART, has informed policy and practice, specifically in relation to better preparing potential entrepreneurs at start-up and expansion stages” (S08).
e. Providing a framework for social mobility through entrepreneurship education
Working in collaboration with a UK national Housing association, our research led to a new (more nuanced) understanding and approach to supporting women who are long-term unemployed tenants, when developing their entrepreneurship training needs. In addition, it led to a greater awareness of the role of the housing association within the entrepreneurial ecosystem, supporting entrepreneurship in some of the most deprived wards of Birmingham:
“This better understanding helped inform our wider recognition of local enterprise needs and challenges facing our communities. As a result we have developed a more sensitive and tailored approach to community grant management and procurement within the New Initiatives Team, this has been particularly evident in relation to our delivery of the Hall Green Neighbourhood Network Scheme and Hall Green Families and Early Help” (S09).
f. Inclusion of our best practice in leading EU guide for Entrepreneurship
BCU’s work is used as an exemplar in the leading EU Framework for EE. EntreComp was established to address the European Commission’s policy objective to create a ‘sense of initiative and entrepreneurship’ as one of the key competencies for lifelong learning. Specifically, the BCU EntreComp case study used the experiential learning approach developed through BCU’s research and applied teaching guidance (S10). EntreComp has been widely adopted, globally, by entrepreneurship educators. In the UK, EntreComp is recommended by leading policy makers and HEI EE support networks, including Entrepreneurship Educators UK, and the National Centre for Entrepreneurship Education.
5. Sources to corroborate the impact
S01 AHEAD Project
AHEAD Survey Data
S02 BEST Project Chair
Testimonial, Chairperson, International Management Institute
S03 BEST Compendium of good practices
Corporate responsibility, social entrepreneurship, and social innovation
S04 BEST Teaching Content
Social Entrepreneurship teaching module
S05 BEST Report
Business Education for Sustainability
S06 Microfinance and SAS Capital Money Lending
Testimonial: Director of Operations, SAS Capital Money Lending, Ghana
S07 Microfinance and IBSL
Testimonial: Director of Institute of Business Studies and Leadership, Abdul Wali Khan University, Mardan, Pakistan [Named Corroborator 001]
S08 Microfinance and ARTS
Testimonial, Chief Executive, ARTS Business Loans, UK
S09 ASHRAM Accord Housing Association
Testimonial, CEO, ASHRAM Accord HA
S10 EntreComp: European Entrepreneurship Competence Framework
European Entrepreneurship Competence Framework user guide